Processing math: 2%
CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-23-006 ; CERN-EP-2024-095
Review of searches for vector-like quarks, vector-like leptons, and heavy neutral leptons in proton-proton collisions at s= 13 TeV at the CMS experiment
Physics Reports 1115 (2025) 570
Abstract: The LHC has provided an unprecedented amount of proton-proton collision data, bringing forth exciting opportunities to address fundamental open questions in particle physics. These questions can potentially be answered by performing searches for very rare processes predicted by models that attempt to extend the standard model of particle physics. The data collected by the CMS experiment in 2015--2018 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV can be used to test the standard model with high precision and potentially uncover evidence for new particles or interactions. An interesting possibility is the existence of new fermions with masses ranging from the MeVns to the TeVns scale. Such new particles appear in many possible extensions of the standard model and are well motivated theoretically. New fermions may explain the appearance of three generations of leptons and quarks, the mass hierarchy across these generations, and the nonzero neutrino masses. In this report, the results of searches targeting vector-like quarks, vector-like leptons, and heavy neutral leptons at the CMS experiment are summarized. The complementarity of current searches for each type of new fermion is discussed, and combinations of several searches for vector-like quarks are presented. The discovery potential for some of these searches at the High-Luminosity LHC is also discussed.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Representative Feynman diagrams showing the production of VLQs (Q, left), VLLs (L, middle), and HNLs (N, right) in proton-proton collisions.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Representative Feynman diagrams showing the production of VLQs (Q, left), VLLs (L, middle), and HNLs (N, right) in proton-proton collisions.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Representative Feynman diagrams showing the production of VLQs (Q, left), VLLs (L, middle), and HNLs (N, right) in proton-proton collisions.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Representative Feynman diagrams showing the production of VLQs (Q, left), VLLs (L, middle), and HNLs (N, right) in proton-proton collisions.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Examples of either four (left) or six (right) selection regions used in the ABCD background estimation method. The region for which both criteria are satisfied is the SR. Expanding beyond four regions provides at least one ``validation region'' (VR).

png
Figure 2-a:
Examples of either four (left) or six (right) selection regions used in the ABCD background estimation method. The region for which both criteria are satisfied is the SR. Expanding beyond four regions provides at least one ``validation region'' (VR).

png
Figure 2-b:
Examples of either four (left) or six (right) selection regions used in the ABCD background estimation method. The region for which both criteria are satisfied is the SR. Expanding beyond four regions provides at least one ``validation region'' (VR).

png pdf
Figure 3:
Representative LO Feynman diagrams for pair production of VLQs via the strong interaction (upper row) and single production of VLQs via EW processes (lower left) or via new interactions (lower right). Here, Q stands for either VLQ flavor.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Representative LO Feynman diagrams for pair production of VLQs via the strong interaction (upper row) and single production of VLQs via EW processes (lower left) or via new interactions (lower right). Here, Q stands for either VLQ flavor.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Representative LO Feynman diagrams for pair production of VLQs via the strong interaction (upper row) and single production of VLQs via EW processes (lower left) or via new interactions (lower right). Here, Q stands for either VLQ flavor.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Representative LO Feynman diagrams for pair production of VLQs via the strong interaction (upper row) and single production of VLQs via EW processes (lower left) or via new interactions (lower right). Here, Q stands for either VLQ flavor.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Representative LO Feynman diagrams for pair production of VLQs via the strong interaction (upper row) and single production of VLQs via EW processes (lower left) or via new interactions (lower right). Here, Q stands for either VLQ flavor.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Cross sections for the production of VLQs at s= 13 TeV as a function of the VLQ mass. Pair production cross sections via the strong interaction are computed to NNLO, using the models and tools from Refs. [127,128,129] (left). Reduced cross section ˆσ for single production via the EW interaction is computed at LO in EW in the NWA using the models and tools from Refs. [130,128,118,131] (right). The shaded bands indicate PDF, renormalization scale, and factorization scale uncertainties associated with the predictions.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Cross sections for the production of VLQs at s= 13 TeV as a function of the VLQ mass. Pair production cross sections via the strong interaction are computed to NNLO, using the models and tools from Refs. [127,128,129] (left). Reduced cross section ˆσ for single production via the EW interaction is computed at LO in EW in the NWA using the models and tools from Refs. [130,128,118,131] (right). The shaded bands indicate PDF, renormalization scale, and factorization scale uncertainties associated with the predictions.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Cross sections for the production of VLQs at s= 13 TeV as a function of the VLQ mass. Pair production cross sections via the strong interaction are computed to NNLO, using the models and tools from Refs. [127,128,129] (left). Reduced cross section ˆσ for single production via the EW interaction is computed at LO in EW in the NWA using the models and tools from Refs. [130,128,118,131] (right). The shaded bands indicate PDF, renormalization scale, and factorization scale uncertainties associated with the predictions.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Coupling factors for single VLQ production via the EW interaction in the narrow-width approximation as a function of the VLQ mass, using the models and tools from Refs. [130,128,118,131]. Coupling factors in single production of T (upper left), B (upper right) in the singlet (solid lines) and doublet (dashed lines) scenarios. Coupling factors in single production of X5/3 (lower left), Y4/3 (lower right) in doublet scenarios.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Coupling factors for single VLQ production via the EW interaction in the narrow-width approximation as a function of the VLQ mass, using the models and tools from Refs. [130,128,118,131]. Coupling factors in single production of T (upper left), B (upper right) in the singlet (solid lines) and doublet (dashed lines) scenarios. Coupling factors in single production of X5/3 (lower left), Y4/3 (lower right) in doublet scenarios.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Coupling factors for single VLQ production via the EW interaction in the narrow-width approximation as a function of the VLQ mass, using the models and tools from Refs. [130,128,118,131]. Coupling factors in single production of T (upper left), B (upper right) in the singlet (solid lines) and doublet (dashed lines) scenarios. Coupling factors in single production of X5/3 (lower left), Y4/3 (lower right) in doublet scenarios.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Coupling factors for single VLQ production via the EW interaction in the narrow-width approximation as a function of the VLQ mass, using the models and tools from Refs. [130,128,118,131]. Coupling factors in single production of T (upper left), B (upper right) in the singlet (solid lines) and doublet (dashed lines) scenarios. Coupling factors in single production of X5/3 (lower left), Y4/3 (lower right) in doublet scenarios.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Coupling factors for single VLQ production via the EW interaction in the narrow-width approximation as a function of the VLQ mass, using the models and tools from Refs. [130,128,118,131]. Coupling factors in single production of T (upper left), B (upper right) in the singlet (solid lines) and doublet (dashed lines) scenarios. Coupling factors in single production of X5/3 (lower left), Y4/3 (lower right) in doublet scenarios.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Distributions of observables used to maximize the X5/3X5/3 signal significance for the SSDL (left) and single-lepton (right) final states. The left figure shows the HlepT distribution after the SS dilepton selection, Z boson and quarkonia lepton invariant mass vetoes, and the requirement of at least two small-radius jets in the event, for a combination of ee, eμ, and μμ channels. The right figure shows the min distribution in events with \geq 1 t-tagged jet, \geq 1 W-tagged jets, and \geq 2 b-tagged jets for the combined electron and muon samples in the SR. The distribution has variable-size bins such that the statistical uncertainty in each bin is less than 30%. The lower panel in each plot shows the difference between the observed and the predicted numbers of events divided by the total uncertainty. Figures taken from Ref. [143].

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Distributions of observables used to maximize the {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} signal significance for the SSDL (left) and single-lepton (right) final states. The left figure shows the H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{lep}} distribution after the SS dilepton selection, Z boson and quarkonia lepton invariant mass vetoes, and the requirement of at least two small-radius jets in the event, for a combination of \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e} , \mathrm{e}\mu , and \mu\mu channels. The right figure shows the \min M(\ell,\mathrm{b}) distribution in events with \geq 1 t-tagged jet, \geq 1 W-tagged jets, and \geq 2 b-tagged jets for the combined electron and muon samples in the SR. The distribution has variable-size bins such that the statistical uncertainty in each bin is less than 30%. The lower panel in each plot shows the difference between the observed and the predicted numbers of events divided by the total uncertainty. Figures taken from Ref. [143].

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Distributions of observables used to maximize the {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} signal significance for the SSDL (left) and single-lepton (right) final states. The left figure shows the H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{lep}} distribution after the SS dilepton selection, Z boson and quarkonia lepton invariant mass vetoes, and the requirement of at least two small-radius jets in the event, for a combination of \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e} , \mathrm{e}\mu , and \mu\mu channels. The right figure shows the \min M(\ell,\mathrm{b}) distribution in events with \geq 1 t-tagged jet, \geq 1 W-tagged jets, and \geq 2 b-tagged jets for the combined electron and muon samples in the SR. The distribution has variable-size bins such that the statistical uncertainty in each bin is less than 30%. The lower panel in each plot shows the difference between the observed and the predicted numbers of events divided by the total uncertainty. Figures taken from Ref. [143].

png pdf
Figure 7:
Expected and observed cross section upper limits at 95% CL for an LH (left) and RH (right) \mathrm{X}_{5/3} as a function of its mass, after combining the SS dilepton and single-lepton final states. The theoretical uncertainty in the signal cross section is shown with a band around the theoretical prediction. Figures adapted from Ref. [143].

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Expected and observed cross section upper limits at 95% CL for an LH (left) and RH (right) \mathrm{X}_{5/3} as a function of its mass, after combining the SS dilepton and single-lepton final states. The theoretical uncertainty in the signal cross section is shown with a band around the theoretical prediction. Figures adapted from Ref. [143].

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Expected and observed cross section upper limits at 95% CL for an LH (left) and RH (right) \mathrm{X}_{5/3} as a function of its mass, after combining the SS dilepton and single-lepton final states. The theoretical uncertainty in the signal cross section is shown with a band around the theoretical prediction. Figures adapted from Ref. [143].

png pdf
Figure 8:
Distributions of H_{\mathrm{T}} in a combination of SRs in the NN-based approach, inclusive in \geq 1 t tags (left), and in the SR with two W-tagged and two b-tagged jets in the selection-based approach (right). The lower panels show the ratio between observed data and the background estimate. Figures taken from Ref. [140].

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Distributions of H_{\mathrm{T}} in a combination of SRs in the NN-based approach, inclusive in \geq 1 t tags (left), and in the SR with two W-tagged and two b-tagged jets in the selection-based approach (right). The lower panels show the ratio between observed data and the background estimate. Figures taken from Ref. [140].

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Distributions of H_{\mathrm{T}} in a combination of SRs in the NN-based approach, inclusive in \geq 1 t tags (left), and in the SR with two W-tagged and two b-tagged jets in the selection-based approach (right). The lower panels show the ratio between observed data and the background estimate. Figures taken from Ref. [140].

png pdf
Figure 9:
Observed lower limits at 95% CL on the T quark mass as functions of the T quark branching fractions to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} , using the NN-based (left) and selection-based (right) approaches. Figures adapted from Ref. [140].

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Observed lower limits at 95% CL on the T quark mass as functions of the T quark branching fractions to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} , using the NN-based (left) and selection-based (right) approaches. Figures adapted from Ref. [140].

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Observed lower limits at 95% CL on the T quark mass as functions of the T quark branching fractions to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} , using the NN-based (left) and selection-based (right) approaches. Figures adapted from Ref. [140].

png pdf
Figure 10:
Example single-lepton channel {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} NN output distributions of the T quark score in the inclusive SR (left) and the W+jets score in the CRs (right). The observed data are shown using black markers, predicted {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} signals with a T mass of 1.2 (1.5) TeV in the singlet scenario using solid (dashed) lines, and backgrounds using filled histograms. Statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background estimate before performing the fit to data are shown by the hatched region. The lower panels show the difference between the observed data and the background estimate as a multiple of the total uncertainty in both sources. The signal predictions in the left distribution have been scaled for visibility by the factor indicated in the figure. Figures taken from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Example single-lepton channel {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} NN output distributions of the T quark score in the inclusive SR (left) and the W+jets score in the CRs (right). The observed data are shown using black markers, predicted {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} signals with a T mass of 1.2 (1.5) TeV in the singlet scenario using solid (dashed) lines, and backgrounds using filled histograms. Statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background estimate before performing the fit to data are shown by the hatched region. The lower panels show the difference between the observed data and the background estimate as a multiple of the total uncertainty in both sources. The signal predictions in the left distribution have been scaled for visibility by the factor indicated in the figure. Figures taken from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Example single-lepton channel {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} NN output distributions of the T quark score in the inclusive SR (left) and the W+jets score in the CRs (right). The observed data are shown using black markers, predicted {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} signals with a T mass of 1.2 (1.5) TeV in the singlet scenario using solid (dashed) lines, and backgrounds using filled histograms. Statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background estimate before performing the fit to data are shown by the hatched region. The lower panels show the difference between the observed data and the background estimate as a multiple of the total uncertainty in both sources. The signal predictions in the left distribution have been scaled for visibility by the factor indicated in the figure. Figures taken from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 11:
Template histograms of H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{lep}} in the \mu\mu category of the SS dilepton channel (left) and S_{\mathrm{T}} in the \mu\mu\mu category of the multilepton channel (right). The observed data from 2017--2018 (combined for illustration) are shown using black markers, the predicted {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} signal for a mass of 1.2 (1.5) TeV in the singlet scenario using solid (dashed) lines, and the postfit background estimates using filled histograms. Statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background estimate after performing the fit to the observed data are shown by the hatched region. The lower panels show the difference between the observed data and the background estimate as a multiple of the total uncertainty from both sources. Figures adapted from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
Template histograms of H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{lep}} in the \mu\mu category of the SS dilepton channel (left) and S_{\mathrm{T}} in the \mu\mu\mu category of the multilepton channel (right). The observed data from 2017--2018 (combined for illustration) are shown using black markers, the predicted {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} signal for a mass of 1.2 (1.5) TeV in the singlet scenario using solid (dashed) lines, and the postfit background estimates using filled histograms. Statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background estimate after performing the fit to the observed data are shown by the hatched region. The lower panels show the difference between the observed data and the background estimate as a multiple of the total uncertainty from both sources. Figures adapted from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
Template histograms of H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{lep}} in the \mu\mu category of the SS dilepton channel (left) and S_{\mathrm{T}} in the \mu\mu\mu category of the multilepton channel (right). The observed data from 2017--2018 (combined for illustration) are shown using black markers, the predicted {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} signal for a mass of 1.2 (1.5) TeV in the singlet scenario using solid (dashed) lines, and the postfit background estimates using filled histograms. Statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background estimate after performing the fit to the observed data are shown by the hatched region. The lower panels show the difference between the observed data and the background estimate as a multiple of the total uncertainty from both sources. Figures adapted from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 12:
The 95% CL expected (left) and observed (right) lower mass limits on pair-produced T quark masses, from the combined fit to the three leptonic channels, as functions of their branching fractions to Higgs and W bosons. Mass contours are shown with lines of various styles. Figures adapted from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 12-a:
The 95% CL expected (left) and observed (right) lower mass limits on pair-produced T quark masses, from the combined fit to the three leptonic channels, as functions of their branching fractions to Higgs and W bosons. Mass contours are shown with lines of various styles. Figures adapted from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 12-b:
The 95% CL expected (left) and observed (right) lower mass limits on pair-produced T quark masses, from the combined fit to the three leptonic channels, as functions of their branching fractions to Higgs and W bosons. Mass contours are shown with lines of various styles. Figures adapted from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 13:
The 95% CL expected (left) and observed (right) lower mass limits on pair-produced B quark masses, from the combined fit to the three leptonic channels, as functions of branching fractions to Higgs and W bosons. Mass contours are shown with lines of various styles. Figures adapted from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 13-a:
The 95% CL expected (left) and observed (right) lower mass limits on pair-produced B quark masses, from the combined fit to the three leptonic channels, as functions of branching fractions to Higgs and W bosons. Mass contours are shown with lines of various styles. Figures adapted from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 13-b:
The 95% CL expected (left) and observed (right) lower mass limits on pair-produced B quark masses, from the combined fit to the three leptonic channels, as functions of branching fractions to Higgs and W bosons. Mass contours are shown with lines of various styles. Figures adapted from Ref. [141].

png pdf
Figure 14:
Observed lower limit at 95% CL on B quark masses as a function of the branching fractions to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} , for the NN-based (left) and selection-based (right) approaches of the search for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production in the all-hadronic final state. Figures adapted from Ref. [140].

png pdf
Figure 14-a:
Observed lower limit at 95% CL on B quark masses as a function of the branching fractions to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} , for the NN-based (left) and selection-based (right) approaches of the search for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production in the all-hadronic final state. Figures adapted from Ref. [140].

png pdf
Figure 14-b:
Observed lower limit at 95% CL on B quark masses as a function of the branching fractions to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} , for the NN-based (left) and selection-based (right) approaches of the search for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production in the all-hadronic final state. Figures adapted from Ref. [140].

png pdf
Figure 15:
Distributions of the reconstructed VLQ mass for expected background (blue histogram), signal plus background (colored lines), and observed data (black points) for events in the hadronic four-jet \mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} category (left) and the leptonic four-jet \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} category (right) in the search for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production. Five signal masses are shown: 1000 GeV (pink), 1200 GeV (red), 1400 GeV (orange), 1600 GeV (yellow), and 1800 GeV (green). The signal distributions are normalized to the number of events determined by the expected VLQ production cross section. The hatched regions indicate the total systematic uncertainty in the background estimate. The lower panels show the difference between the observed data and the background estimate as a multiple of the background estimate. Figures taken from Ref. [142].

png pdf
Figure 15-a:
Distributions of the reconstructed VLQ mass for expected background (blue histogram), signal plus background (colored lines), and observed data (black points) for events in the hadronic four-jet \mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} category (left) and the leptonic four-jet \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} category (right) in the search for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production. Five signal masses are shown: 1000 GeV (pink), 1200 GeV (red), 1400 GeV (orange), 1600 GeV (yellow), and 1800 GeV (green). The signal distributions are normalized to the number of events determined by the expected VLQ production cross section. The hatched regions indicate the total systematic uncertainty in the background estimate. The lower panels show the difference between the observed data and the background estimate as a multiple of the background estimate. Figures taken from Ref. [142].

png pdf
Figure 15-b:
Distributions of the reconstructed VLQ mass for expected background (blue histogram), signal plus background (colored lines), and observed data (black points) for events in the hadronic four-jet \mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} category (left) and the leptonic four-jet \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} category (right) in the search for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production. Five signal masses are shown: 1000 GeV (pink), 1200 GeV (red), 1400 GeV (orange), 1600 GeV (yellow), and 1800 GeV (green). The signal distributions are normalized to the number of events determined by the expected VLQ production cross section. The hatched regions indicate the total systematic uncertainty in the background estimate. The lower panels show the difference between the observed data and the background estimate as a multiple of the background estimate. Figures taken from Ref. [142].

png pdf
Figure 16:
Expected (left) and observed (right) lower limits on the B quark mass at 95% CL from the combination of the full Run 2 hadronic and OS dilepton channels, as a function of the branching fractions \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}) and \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}) , with \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W})=1-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H})-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z}) . Results in the grey region, where the lower limit is less than 1.0 TeV, are omitted. Figures adapted from Ref. [142].

png pdf
Figure 16-a:
Expected (left) and observed (right) lower limits on the B quark mass at 95% CL from the combination of the full Run 2 hadronic and OS dilepton channels, as a function of the branching fractions \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}) and \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}) , with \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W})=1-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H})-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z}) . Results in the grey region, where the lower limit is less than 1.0 TeV, are omitted. Figures adapted from Ref. [142].

png pdf
Figure 16-b:
Expected (left) and observed (right) lower limits on the B quark mass at 95% CL from the combination of the full Run 2 hadronic and OS dilepton channels, as a function of the branching fractions \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}) and \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}) , with \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W})=1-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H})-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z}) . Results in the grey region, where the lower limit is less than 1.0 TeV, are omitted. Figures adapted from Ref. [142].

png pdf
Figure 17:
Distributions of the reconstructed T quark mass, m_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}} for the observed data, the background estimates, and the expected signal for the two categories where the singly produced T quark is reconstructed in the resolved topology for events with the Z boson decaying into muons and no forward jets (left) and at least one forward jet (right). The background composition is taken from simulation. The expected signal is shown for two benchmark values of the width, for a T quark produced in association with a b quark: NWA and 30% of the T quark mass. The lower panel in each plot shows the ratio of the observed data to the background estimation, with the hatched band representing the uncertainties in the background estimate. Figures taken from Ref. [144].

png pdf
Figure 17-a:
Distributions of the reconstructed T quark mass, m_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}} for the observed data, the background estimates, and the expected signal for the two categories where the singly produced T quark is reconstructed in the resolved topology for events with the Z boson decaying into muons and no forward jets (left) and at least one forward jet (right). The background composition is taken from simulation. The expected signal is shown for two benchmark values of the width, for a T quark produced in association with a b quark: NWA and 30% of the T quark mass. The lower panel in each plot shows the ratio of the observed data to the background estimation, with the hatched band representing the uncertainties in the background estimate. Figures taken from Ref. [144].

png pdf
Figure 17-b:
Distributions of the reconstructed T quark mass, m_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}} for the observed data, the background estimates, and the expected signal for the two categories where the singly produced T quark is reconstructed in the resolved topology for events with the Z boson decaying into muons and no forward jets (left) and at least one forward jet (right). The background composition is taken from simulation. The expected signal is shown for two benchmark values of the width, for a T quark produced in association with a b quark: NWA and 30% of the T quark mass. The lower panel in each plot shows the ratio of the observed data to the background estimation, with the hatched band representing the uncertainties in the background estimate. Figures taken from Ref. [144].

png pdf
Figure 18:
Observed and expected upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for singlet LH T quark (left) and doublet RH T quark production (right) in association with a b quark and a t quark, respectively, in the NWA hypothesis. The T quark decays to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} with a branching fraction \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}) of 0.25 (0.5) for the left (right) figure. The red lines represent theoretical cross sections calculated at NLO in perturbative QCD, whereas the inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures taken from Ref. [144].

png pdf
Figure 18-a:
Observed and expected upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for singlet LH T quark (left) and doublet RH T quark production (right) in association with a b quark and a t quark, respectively, in the NWA hypothesis. The T quark decays to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} with a branching fraction \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}) of 0.25 (0.5) for the left (right) figure. The red lines represent theoretical cross sections calculated at NLO in perturbative QCD, whereas the inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures taken from Ref. [144].

png pdf
Figure 18-b:
Observed and expected upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for singlet LH T quark (left) and doublet RH T quark production (right) in association with a b quark and a t quark, respectively, in the NWA hypothesis. The T quark decays to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} with a branching fraction \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}) of 0.25 (0.5) for the left (right) figure. The red lines represent theoretical cross sections calculated at NLO in perturbative QCD, whereas the inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures taken from Ref. [144].

png pdf
Figure 19:
Distributions from the 2018 data set of the transverse mass of the reconstructed top quark and {\vec p}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\kern1pt\text{miss}} system, for the selected events in the resolved categories, for events with no forward jet (left) and at least one forward jet (right). The distributions for the main background components have been determined in simulation with SFs extracted from CRs. All background processes and the respective uncertainties are derived from the fit to data, whereas the distributions of signal processes are represented according to the expectation before the fit. The lines show the signal predictions for three benchmark mass values (0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 TeV) for a T quark of a narrow width. Figures taken from Ref. [146].

png pdf
Figure 19-a:
Distributions from the 2018 data set of the transverse mass of the reconstructed top quark and {\vec p}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\kern1pt\text{miss}} system, for the selected events in the resolved categories, for events with no forward jet (left) and at least one forward jet (right). The distributions for the main background components have been determined in simulation with SFs extracted from CRs. All background processes and the respective uncertainties are derived from the fit to data, whereas the distributions of signal processes are represented according to the expectation before the fit. The lines show the signal predictions for three benchmark mass values (0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 TeV) for a T quark of a narrow width. Figures taken from Ref. [146].

png pdf
Figure 19-b:
Distributions from the 2018 data set of the transverse mass of the reconstructed top quark and {\vec p}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\kern1pt\text{miss}} system, for the selected events in the resolved categories, for events with no forward jet (left) and at least one forward jet (right). The distributions for the main background components have been determined in simulation with SFs extracted from CRs. All background processes and the respective uncertainties are derived from the fit to data, whereas the distributions of signal processes are represented according to the expectation before the fit. The lines show the signal predictions for three benchmark mass values (0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 TeV) for a T quark of a narrow width. Figures taken from Ref. [146].

png pdf
Figure 20:
Observed 95% CL upper limit on the product of the single production cross section for a singlet VLQ T quark and the {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} branching fraction, as a function of the T quark mass m_{{\mathrm{T}} } and width \Gamma , for widths from 5 to 30% of the mass. A singlet T quark that is produced in association with a bottom quark is assumed. The solid red line indicates the boundary of the excluded region (on the hatched side) of theoretical cross sections multiplied by the T branching fraction. Figure taken from Ref. [146].

png pdf
Figure 21:
Background-only postfit distributions of \widetilde{m}_{{\mathrm{T}} } , the adjusted T mass sensitive observable defined in Ref. [145], of the observed data for the SR of the {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} (left) and {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} (right) channels, respectively, for the high-mass search. The dashed red histogram in each case represents an example signal for the \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} or \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} process with a T quark mass of 1.2 TeV and a relative width of 30%. The lower panels of the plots display the ratio of observed data to the fitted background for each bin. The error bars on the data points correspond to the 68% CL Poisson intervals, whereas the light blue band in each ratio panel represents the relative uncertainties in the fitted background. Figures taken from Ref. [145].

png pdf
Figure 21-a:
Background-only postfit distributions of \widetilde{m}_{{\mathrm{T}} } , the adjusted T mass sensitive observable defined in Ref. [145], of the observed data for the SR of the {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} (left) and {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} (right) channels, respectively, for the high-mass search. The dashed red histogram in each case represents an example signal for the \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} or \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} process with a T quark mass of 1.2 TeV and a relative width of 30%. The lower panels of the plots display the ratio of observed data to the fitted background for each bin. The error bars on the data points correspond to the 68% CL Poisson intervals, whereas the light blue band in each ratio panel represents the relative uncertainties in the fitted background. Figures taken from Ref. [145].

png pdf
Figure 21-b:
Background-only postfit distributions of \widetilde{m}_{{\mathrm{T}} } , the adjusted T mass sensitive observable defined in Ref. [145], of the observed data for the SR of the {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} (left) and {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} (right) channels, respectively, for the high-mass search. The dashed red histogram in each case represents an example signal for the \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} or \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} process with a T quark mass of 1.2 TeV and a relative width of 30%. The lower panels of the plots display the ratio of observed data to the fitted background for each bin. The error bars on the data points correspond to the 68% CL Poisson intervals, whereas the light blue band in each ratio panel represents the relative uncertainties in the fitted background. Figures taken from Ref. [145].

png pdf
Figure 22:
Background-only postfit five-jet invariant mass distributions for the SR for the low-mass (left) and high-mass (right) selections. The shaded blue region represents the uncertainty in the fitted background estimate. The expected signal distributions (scaled for visibility) for a 700 GeV and a 900 GeV T quark are shown as red dashed lines for the low- and high-mass selections, respectively. Figures adapted from Ref. [148].

png pdf
Figure 22-a:
Background-only postfit five-jet invariant mass distributions for the SR for the low-mass (left) and high-mass (right) selections. The shaded blue region represents the uncertainty in the fitted background estimate. The expected signal distributions (scaled for visibility) for a 700 GeV and a 900 GeV T quark are shown as red dashed lines for the low- and high-mass selections, respectively. Figures adapted from Ref. [148].

png pdf
Figure 22-b:
Background-only postfit five-jet invariant mass distributions for the SR for the low-mass (left) and high-mass (right) selections. The shaded blue region represents the uncertainty in the fitted background estimate. The expected signal distributions (scaled for visibility) for a 700 GeV and a 900 GeV T quark are shown as red dashed lines for the low- and high-mass selections, respectively. Figures adapted from Ref. [148].

png pdf
Figure 23:
Observed and median expected upper limits at 95% CL on the cross sections for single T quark production associated with a b quark, for the sum of \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} channels, as a function of the assumed values of the T quark mass. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The left figure corresponds to the analysis strategy described in Ref. [148], based on the five-jet invariant mass reconstruction of the T. The figure on the right corresponds to the analysis strategy in Ref. [145], which employs different reconstruction algorithms for the low- and high-mass searches. The vertical dashed lines represent the crossover point in sensitivity for the low-mass and high-mass selections. Figures adapted from Refs. [148,145].

png pdf
Figure 23-a:
Observed and median expected upper limits at 95% CL on the cross sections for single T quark production associated with a b quark, for the sum of \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} channels, as a function of the assumed values of the T quark mass. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The left figure corresponds to the analysis strategy described in Ref. [148], based on the five-jet invariant mass reconstruction of the T. The figure on the right corresponds to the analysis strategy in Ref. [145], which employs different reconstruction algorithms for the low- and high-mass searches. The vertical dashed lines represent the crossover point in sensitivity for the low-mass and high-mass selections. Figures adapted from Refs. [148,145].

png pdf
Figure 23-b:
Observed and median expected upper limits at 95% CL on the cross sections for single T quark production associated with a b quark, for the sum of \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} channels, as a function of the assumed values of the T quark mass. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The left figure corresponds to the analysis strategy described in Ref. [148], based on the five-jet invariant mass reconstruction of the T. The figure on the right corresponds to the analysis strategy in Ref. [145], which employs different reconstruction algorithms for the low- and high-mass searches. The vertical dashed lines represent the crossover point in sensitivity for the low-mass and high-mass selections. Figures adapted from Refs. [148,145].

png pdf
Figure 24:
Observed and median expected upper limits at 95% CL on the cross sections for single T quark production associated with a b quark, for the sum of \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} channels, as a function of the assumed values of the T quark mass. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The results are given for relative widths of \Gamma/m_{{\mathrm{T}} }= 10 (upper left), 20 (upper right), and 30% (lower). The vertical dashed lines represent the crossover point in sensitivity for the low-mass and high-mass selections. Figures adapted from Ref. [145].

png pdf
Figure 24-a:
Observed and median expected upper limits at 95% CL on the cross sections for single T quark production associated with a b quark, for the sum of \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} channels, as a function of the assumed values of the T quark mass. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The results are given for relative widths of \Gamma/m_{{\mathrm{T}} }= 10 (upper left), 20 (upper right), and 30% (lower). The vertical dashed lines represent the crossover point in sensitivity for the low-mass and high-mass selections. Figures adapted from Ref. [145].

png pdf
Figure 24-b:
Observed and median expected upper limits at 95% CL on the cross sections for single T quark production associated with a b quark, for the sum of \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} channels, as a function of the assumed values of the T quark mass. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The results are given for relative widths of \Gamma/m_{{\mathrm{T}} }= 10 (upper left), 20 (upper right), and 30% (lower). The vertical dashed lines represent the crossover point in sensitivity for the low-mass and high-mass selections. Figures adapted from Ref. [145].

png pdf
Figure 24-c:
Observed and median expected upper limits at 95% CL on the cross sections for single T quark production associated with a b quark, for the sum of \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q} channels, as a function of the assumed values of the T quark mass. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The results are given for relative widths of \Gamma/m_{{\mathrm{T}} }= 10 (upper left), 20 (upper right), and 30% (lower). The vertical dashed lines represent the crossover point in sensitivity for the low-mass and high-mass selections. Figures adapted from Ref. [145].

png pdf
Figure 25:
Distributions of the observed data (black dots) and m_{\gamma\gamma} signal-plus-background model fits (red line) for a T quark signal with m_{{\mathrm{T}} } of 900 (left) and 1200 GeV (right), combining the leptonic and hadronic channels. The green (yellow) band represents the 68 (95)% CL interval in the background component of the fit. The peak in the background component shows the considered irreducible SM Higgs boson contribution ( \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} , VBF, VH, {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \mathrm{H} , and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} ). Here, \hat{\mu} is the best fit value of the signal strength parameter \mu , which is zero for the two m_{{\mathrm{T}} } values considered. The lower panel shows the residuals after the subtraction of the background component. Figures adapted from Ref. [147].

png pdf
Figure 25-a:
Distributions of the observed data (black dots) and m_{\gamma\gamma} signal-plus-background model fits (red line) for a T quark signal with m_{{\mathrm{T}} } of 900 (left) and 1200 GeV (right), combining the leptonic and hadronic channels. The green (yellow) band represents the 68 (95)% CL interval in the background component of the fit. The peak in the background component shows the considered irreducible SM Higgs boson contribution ( \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} , VBF, VH, {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \mathrm{H} , and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} ). Here, \hat{\mu} is the best fit value of the signal strength parameter \mu , which is zero for the two m_{{\mathrm{T}} } values considered. The lower panel shows the residuals after the subtraction of the background component. Figures adapted from Ref. [147].

png pdf
Figure 25-b:
Distributions of the observed data (black dots) and m_{\gamma\gamma} signal-plus-background model fits (red line) for a T quark signal with m_{{\mathrm{T}} } of 900 (left) and 1200 GeV (right), combining the leptonic and hadronic channels. The green (yellow) band represents the 68 (95)% CL interval in the background component of the fit. The peak in the background component shows the considered irreducible SM Higgs boson contribution ( \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} , VBF, VH, {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \mathrm{H} , and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} ). Here, \hat{\mu} is the best fit value of the signal strength parameter \mu , which is zero for the two m_{{\mathrm{T}} } values considered. The lower panel shows the residuals after the subtraction of the background component. Figures adapted from Ref. [147].

png pdf
Figure 26:
Expected (dotted black) and observed (solid black) upper limits at 95% CL on \sigma_{{\mathrm{T}} \mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}}\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}) are displayed as a function of m_{{\mathrm{T}} } , combining the leptonic and hadronic channels. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The theoretical cross sections for the singlet T production with representative \kappa_{{\mathrm{T}} } values fixed at 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, and 0.25 (for \Gamma/m_{{\mathrm{T}} } < 5% ) are shown as red lines. Figure adapted from Ref. [147].

png pdf
Figure 27:
The distribution in the reconstructed B quark mass in events with one t-tagged jet and a forward jet, where the SM background is obtained from a CR without a forward jet (left). The product of the observed upper limits on the cross section and \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}) as a function of m_{\text{VLQ}} for different relative decay widths of the B quark (right), for single B quark production in association with a b quark. Figures taken from Ref. [151].

png pdf
Figure 27-a:
The distribution in the reconstructed B quark mass in events with one t-tagged jet and a forward jet, where the SM background is obtained from a CR without a forward jet (left). The product of the observed upper limits on the cross section and \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}) as a function of m_{\text{VLQ}} for different relative decay widths of the B quark (right), for single B quark production in association with a b quark. Figures taken from Ref. [151].

png pdf
Figure 27-b:
The distribution in the reconstructed B quark mass in events with one t-tagged jet and a forward jet, where the SM background is obtained from a CR without a forward jet (left). The product of the observed upper limits on the cross section and \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}) as a function of m_{\text{VLQ}} for different relative decay widths of the B quark (right), for single B quark production in association with a b quark. Figures taken from Ref. [151].

png pdf
Figure 28:
Upper limits on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} of the \mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (left) and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{t} (right) production modes at 95% CL. Colored lines show the expected limits from the \ell +jets (dotted) and all-hadronic (dash-dotted) channels, where the latter start at B masses of 1.4 TeV. The observed and expected limits from the combination are shown as solid and dashed black lines, respectively. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of the limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The theoretical cross sections are shown as the red and blue lines, where the uncertainties due to missing higher orders are depicted by shaded areas. Figures adapted from Ref. [153].

png pdf
Figure 28-a:
Upper limits on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} of the \mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (left) and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{t} (right) production modes at 95% CL. Colored lines show the expected limits from the \ell +jets (dotted) and all-hadronic (dash-dotted) channels, where the latter start at B masses of 1.4 TeV. The observed and expected limits from the combination are shown as solid and dashed black lines, respectively. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of the limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The theoretical cross sections are shown as the red and blue lines, where the uncertainties due to missing higher orders are depicted by shaded areas. Figures adapted from Ref. [153].

png pdf
Figure 28-b:
Upper limits on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} of the \mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (left) and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{t} (right) production modes at 95% CL. Colored lines show the expected limits from the \ell +jets (dotted) and all-hadronic (dash-dotted) channels, where the latter start at B masses of 1.4 TeV. The observed and expected limits from the combination are shown as solid and dashed black lines, respectively. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of the limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The theoretical cross sections are shown as the red and blue lines, where the uncertainties due to missing higher orders are depicted by shaded areas. Figures adapted from Ref. [153].

png pdf
Figure 29:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the B quark production cross section and branching fraction to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H} , as a function of the signal mass, under the NWA. The results are shown for the combination of 0 and > 0 forward-jet categories. The continuous red curves correspond to the theoretical expectations for singlet and doublet models. Figure taken from Ref. [150].

png pdf
Figure 30:
Reconstructed m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} (left) and m_{{\mathrm{T}} } (right) distributions obtained in a search for \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{Z}^{'}\to{\mathrm{T}} {\overline{T}} in the all-hadronic final state. The \mathrm{Z}^{'} boson is reconstructed using a t-, a W-, and a b-tagged jet, whereas the T quark is reconstructed using the latter two jets. The lower panels show the difference between the data and the estimated backgrounds divided by the sum in quadrature of the statistical uncertainties in data and backgrounds, and the systematic uncertainties in the estimated backgrounds. Figures adapted from Ref. [154].

png pdf
Figure 30-a:
Reconstructed m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} (left) and m_{{\mathrm{T}} } (right) distributions obtained in a search for \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{Z}^{'}\to{\mathrm{T}} {\overline{T}} in the all-hadronic final state. The \mathrm{Z}^{'} boson is reconstructed using a t-, a W-, and a b-tagged jet, whereas the T quark is reconstructed using the latter two jets. The lower panels show the difference between the data and the estimated backgrounds divided by the sum in quadrature of the statistical uncertainties in data and backgrounds, and the systematic uncertainties in the estimated backgrounds. Figures adapted from Ref. [154].

png pdf
Figure 30-b:
Reconstructed m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} (left) and m_{{\mathrm{T}} } (right) distributions obtained in a search for \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{Z}^{'}\to{\mathrm{T}} {\overline{T}} in the all-hadronic final state. The \mathrm{Z}^{'} boson is reconstructed using a t-, a W-, and a b-tagged jet, whereas the T quark is reconstructed using the latter two jets. The lower panels show the difference between the data and the estimated backgrounds divided by the sum in quadrature of the statistical uncertainties in data and backgrounds, and the systematic uncertainties in the estimated backgrounds. Figures adapted from Ref. [154].

png pdf
Figure 31:
Reconstructed m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} distributions obtained in a search for \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{Z}^{'}\to{\mathrm{T}} {\overline{T}} in the \ell +jets final state, in events with a V- and a t-tagged jet (left) and in events with an H-tagged jet (right). The lower panels show the ratio of the observed data to the background prediction. Figures adapted from Ref. [155].

png pdf
Figure 31-a:
Reconstructed m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} distributions obtained in a search for \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{Z}^{'}\to{\mathrm{T}} {\overline{T}} in the \ell +jets final state, in events with a V- and a t-tagged jet (left) and in events with an H-tagged jet (right). The lower panels show the ratio of the observed data to the background prediction. Figures adapted from Ref. [155].

png pdf
Figure 31-b:
Reconstructed m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} distributions obtained in a search for \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{Z}^{'}\to{\mathrm{T}} {\overline{T}} in the \ell +jets final state, in events with a V- and a t-tagged jet (left) and in events with an H-tagged jet (right). The lower panels show the ratio of the observed data to the background prediction. Figures adapted from Ref. [155].

png pdf
Figure 32:
Reconstructed \mathrm{W^{'}} boson mass distributions obtained in a search for \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{W^{'}}\to{\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{b}}/{\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{t}} in the all-hadronic final state, in events with a t-, H- and b-tagged jet (left). Upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for the production of a \mathrm{W^{'}} boson with decays to {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{b}} and {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{t}} (right). Figures adapted from Ref. [157].

png pdf
Figure 32-a:
Reconstructed \mathrm{W^{'}} boson mass distributions obtained in a search for \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{W^{'}}\to{\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{b}}/{\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{t}} in the all-hadronic final state, in events with a t-, H- and b-tagged jet (left). Upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for the production of a \mathrm{W^{'}} boson with decays to {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{b}} and {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{t}} (right). Figures adapted from Ref. [157].

png pdf
Figure 32-b:
Reconstructed \mathrm{W^{'}} boson mass distributions obtained in a search for \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}\to\mathrm{W^{'}}\to{\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{b}}/{\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{t}} in the all-hadronic final state, in events with a t-, H- and b-tagged jet (left). Upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for the production of a \mathrm{W^{'}} boson with decays to {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{b}} and {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{t}} (right). Figures adapted from Ref. [157].

png pdf
Figure 33:
Observed (solid lines) and expected (dashed lines) 95% CL upper limits on {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production as a function of the B quark mass for the singlet (left) and doublet (right) branching fraction scenarios, from the combination of two searches for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production. Predicted cross sections are shown by the red line surrounded by a band representing energy scale and PDF uncertainties in the calculation.

png pdf
Figure 33-a:
Observed (solid lines) and expected (dashed lines) 95% CL upper limits on {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production as a function of the B quark mass for the singlet (left) and doublet (right) branching fraction scenarios, from the combination of two searches for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production. Predicted cross sections are shown by the red line surrounded by a band representing energy scale and PDF uncertainties in the calculation.

png pdf
Figure 33-b:
Observed (solid lines) and expected (dashed lines) 95% CL upper limits on {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production as a function of the B quark mass for the singlet (left) and doublet (right) branching fraction scenarios, from the combination of two searches for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production. Predicted cross sections are shown by the red line surrounded by a band representing energy scale and PDF uncertainties in the calculation.

png pdf
Figure 34:
Expected (left) and observed (right) lower limits on the B quark mass at 95% CL from the combination of two searches for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production. The limits are shown as a function of the branching fractions \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}) and \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}) , with \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W})=1-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H})-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z}) .

png pdf
Figure 34-a:
Expected (left) and observed (right) lower limits on the B quark mass at 95% CL from the combination of two searches for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production. The limits are shown as a function of the branching fractions \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}) and \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}) , with \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W})=1-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H})-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z}) .

png pdf
Figure 34-b:
Expected (left) and observed (right) lower limits on the B quark mass at 95% CL from the combination of two searches for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production. The limits are shown as a function of the branching fractions \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}) and \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}) , with \mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W})=1-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H})-\mathcal{B}({\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z}) .

png pdf
Figure 35:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a single T quark in association with a b quark in a singlet scenario, versus the T quark mass. Theoretical predictions for relative widths of 1 and 5% of the mass are shown as red solid line and red dashed line, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 36:
Expected (left) and observed (right) 95% CL upper limits on the product of the single-production cross section and the {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}/\mathrm{H} branching fraction for a singlet T quark, as a function of the T quark mass m_{{\mathrm{T}} } and width \Gamma , for relative widths from 1 to 30% of the mass. A singlet T quark that is produced in association with a b quark is assumed. The solid red line indicates the boundary of the excluded region (hatched area) of theoretical cross sections.

png pdf
Figure 36-a:
Expected (left) and observed (right) 95% CL upper limits on the product of the single-production cross section and the {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}/\mathrm{H} branching fraction for a singlet T quark, as a function of the T quark mass m_{{\mathrm{T}} } and width \Gamma , for relative widths from 1 to 30% of the mass. A singlet T quark that is produced in association with a b quark is assumed. The solid red line indicates the boundary of the excluded region (hatched area) of theoretical cross sections.

png pdf
Figure 36-b:
Expected (left) and observed (right) 95% CL upper limits on the product of the single-production cross section and the {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}/\mathrm{H} branching fraction for a singlet T quark, as a function of the T quark mass m_{{\mathrm{T}} } and width \Gamma , for relative widths from 1 to 30% of the mass. A singlet T quark that is produced in association with a b quark is assumed. The solid red line indicates the boundary of the excluded region (hatched area) of theoretical cross sections.

png pdf
Figure 37:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like T quarks decaying to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} (upper left), \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} (upper right), and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} (lower), as a function of the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets (NN, selection-based) [140], and \geq 1 \ell +jets [141]. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 37-a:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like T quarks decaying to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} (upper left), \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} (upper right), and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} (lower), as a function of the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets (NN, selection-based) [140], and \geq 1 \ell +jets [141]. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 37-b:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like T quarks decaying to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} (upper left), \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} (upper right), and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} (lower), as a function of the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets (NN, selection-based) [140], and \geq 1 \ell +jets [141]. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 37-c:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like T quarks decaying to \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} (upper left), \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} (upper right), and \mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} (lower), as a function of the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets (NN, selection-based) [140], and \geq 1 \ell +jets [141]. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 38:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like B quarks decaying to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} (upper left), \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H} (upper right), and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} (lower), as a function of the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets (NN) [140], 0 \ell +jets [159], \geq 1 \ell +jets [141], 0\ell/2 \ell +jets [142], and the {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} combination of Section 6.5.1. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 38-a:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like B quarks decaying to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} (upper left), \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H} (upper right), and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} (lower), as a function of the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets (NN) [140], 0 \ell +jets [159], \geq 1 \ell +jets [141], 0\ell/2 \ell +jets [142], and the {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} combination of Section 6.5.1. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 38-b:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like B quarks decaying to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} (upper left), \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H} (upper right), and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} (lower), as a function of the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets (NN) [140], 0 \ell +jets [159], \geq 1 \ell +jets [141], 0\ell/2 \ell +jets [142], and the {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} combination of Section 6.5.1. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 38-c:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like B quarks decaying to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} (upper left), \mathrm{b}\mathrm{H} (upper right), and \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} (lower), as a function of the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets (NN) [140], 0 \ell +jets [159], \geq 1 \ell +jets [141], 0\ell/2 \ell +jets [142], and the {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} combination of Section 6.5.1. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 39:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like T or B quarks, as functions of their mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets [159], \geq 1 \ell +jets [141], 0\ell/2 \ell +jets [142], and the {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} combination. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Branching fractions of a singlet (upper and lower left panel) and doublet (upper and lower right panel) are assumed.

png pdf
Figure 39-a:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like T or B quarks, as functions of their mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets [159], \geq 1 \ell +jets [141], 0\ell/2 \ell +jets [142], and the {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} combination. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Branching fractions of a singlet (upper and lower left panel) and doublet (upper and lower right panel) are assumed.

png pdf
Figure 39-b:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like T or B quarks, as functions of their mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets [159], \geq 1 \ell +jets [141], 0\ell/2 \ell +jets [142], and the {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} combination. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Branching fractions of a singlet (upper and lower left panel) and doublet (upper and lower right panel) are assumed.

png pdf
Figure 39-c:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a pair of vector-like T or B quarks, as functions of their mass, obtained by different analyses: 0 \ell +jets [159], \geq 1 \ell +jets [141], 0\ell/2 \ell +jets [142], and the {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} combination. A theory prediction at NNLO in perturbative QCD of the pair production cross section in the NWA is superimposed. Branching fractions of a singlet (upper and lower left panel) and doublet (upper and lower right panel) are assumed.

png pdf
Figure 40:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a single T quark in association with a b quark (upper) or a t quark (lower row) in a singlet (upper and lower left) and doublet (lower right) scenario, versus the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [149], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (merged-jet) [145], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\gamma\gamma [147], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\nu\nu [146], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [148], and the single T quark combination of Section 6.5.2. Only the three analyses using the full Run 2 data set are included in the single T quark combination. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 40-a:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a single T quark in association with a b quark (upper) or a t quark (lower row) in a singlet (upper and lower left) and doublet (lower right) scenario, versus the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [149], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (merged-jet) [145], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\gamma\gamma [147], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\nu\nu [146], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [148], and the single T quark combination of Section 6.5.2. Only the three analyses using the full Run 2 data set are included in the single T quark combination. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 40-b:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a single T quark in association with a b quark (upper) or a t quark (lower row) in a singlet (upper and lower left) and doublet (lower right) scenario, versus the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [149], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (merged-jet) [145], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\gamma\gamma [147], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\nu\nu [146], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [148], and the single T quark combination of Section 6.5.2. Only the three analyses using the full Run 2 data set are included in the single T quark combination. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 40-c:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a single T quark in association with a b quark (upper) or a t quark (lower row) in a singlet (upper and lower left) and doublet (lower right) scenario, versus the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [149], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (merged-jet) [145], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\gamma\gamma [147], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\nu\nu [146], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [148], and the single T quark combination of Section 6.5.2. Only the three analyses using the full Run 2 data set are included in the single T quark combination. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 41:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a single B quark in association with a b quark (upper row) or a t quark (lower) in a singlet (upper left and lower) and doublet (upper right) scenario, versus the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151], and {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [150]. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 41-a:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a single B quark in association with a b quark (upper row) or a t quark (lower) in a singlet (upper left and lower) and doublet (upper right) scenario, versus the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151], and {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [150]. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 41-b:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a single B quark in association with a b quark (upper row) or a t quark (lower) in a singlet (upper left and lower) and doublet (upper right) scenario, versus the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151], and {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [150]. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 41-c:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section of a single B quark in association with a b quark (upper row) or a t quark (lower) in a singlet (upper left and lower) and doublet (upper right) scenario, versus the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151], and {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [150]. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 42:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the coupling strength \kappa for single T quark production in a singlet (upper) and doublet (lower) scenarios as functions of the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (merged-jet) [145], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [149], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\gamma\gamma [147], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\nu\nu [146], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [148], and the single T quark combination of Section 6.5.2. Only the three analyses using the full Run 2 data set are included in the single T quark combination. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 42-a:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the coupling strength \kappa for single T quark production in a singlet (upper) and doublet (lower) scenarios as functions of the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (merged-jet) [145], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [149], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\gamma\gamma [147], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\nu\nu [146], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [148], and the single T quark combination of Section 6.5.2. Only the three analyses using the full Run 2 data set are included in the single T quark combination. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 42-b:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the coupling strength \kappa for single T quark production in a singlet (upper) and doublet (lower) scenarios as functions of the T quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} (merged-jet) [145], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [149], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\ell [144], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\gamma\gamma [147], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\nu\nu [146], {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [148], and the single T quark combination of Section 6.5.2. Only the three analyses using the full Run 2 data set are included in the single T quark combination. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 43:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the coupling strength \kappa for single B quark production in a singlet (upper) and doublet (lower) scenarios as functions of the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [150], and {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151]. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 43-a:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the coupling strength \kappa for single B quark production in a singlet (upper) and doublet (lower) scenarios as functions of the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [150], and {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151]. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 43-b:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the coupling strength \kappa for single B quark production in a singlet (upper) and doublet (lower) scenarios as functions of the B quark mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\,\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} [150], and {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151]. Two theory predictions at LO in perturbative QCD are superimposed, corresponding to different VLQ widths. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run 2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a spade symbol in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 44:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the coupling strength \kappa for single \mathrm{X}_{5/3} (left) and \mathrm{Y}_{4/3} (right) production as functions of the VLQ mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151], and {\mathrm{Y}_{4/3}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\,\ell\nu [149]. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run-s2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 44-a:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the coupling strength \kappa for single \mathrm{X}_{5/3} (left) and \mathrm{Y}_{4/3} (right) production as functions of the VLQ mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151], and {\mathrm{Y}_{4/3}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\,\ell\nu [149]. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run-s2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 44-b:
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the coupling strength \kappa for single \mathrm{X}_{5/3} (left) and \mathrm{Y}_{4/3} (right) production as functions of the VLQ mass, obtained by different analyses: {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [153], {\mathrm{X}_{5/3}} \to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q}\,\ell\nu/\mathrm{b}\ell\nu\,\mathrm{q}\mathrm{q} [151], and {\mathrm{Y}_{4/3}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{b}\,\ell\nu [149]. Searches using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb ^{-1} and 36 fb ^{-1} , rather than the full Run-s2 integrated luminosity of 138 fb ^{-1} , are indicated with a heart and spade symbol, respectively, in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 45:
Distributions of the S_{\mathrm{T}} observable for signal and background processes (left), with signal distributions scaled by factors of 20, 2000, and 200\,000, depending on the T quark mass, and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} production cross section (right). The inner (green) and the outer (yellow) bands indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures adapted from Ref. [170].

png pdf
Figure 45-a:
Distributions of the S_{\mathrm{T}} observable for signal and background processes (left), with signal distributions scaled by factors of 20, 2000, and 200\,000, depending on the T quark mass, and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} production cross section (right). The inner (green) and the outer (yellow) bands indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures adapted from Ref. [170].

png pdf
Figure 45-b:
Distributions of the S_{\mathrm{T}} observable for signal and background processes (left), with signal distributions scaled by factors of 20, 2000, and 200\,000, depending on the T quark mass, and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the {\mathrm{T}} \overline{\mathrm{T}} production cross section (right). The inner (green) and the outer (yellow) bands indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures adapted from Ref. [170].

png pdf
Figure 46:
Expected significances for T quark pair production as a function of the integrated luminosity at the HL-LHC, assuming equal branching fractions for {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} , \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} , \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} decays (left). Discovery potential at three and five standard deviations for T quark pairs, as a function of the T quark mass and the integrated luminosity (right). Figures adapted from Ref. [170].

png pdf
Figure 46-a:
Expected significances for T quark pair production as a function of the integrated luminosity at the HL-LHC, assuming equal branching fractions for {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} , \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} , \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} decays (left). Discovery potential at three and five standard deviations for T quark pairs, as a function of the T quark mass and the integrated luminosity (right). Figures adapted from Ref. [170].

png pdf
Figure 46-b:
Expected significances for T quark pair production as a function of the integrated luminosity at the HL-LHC, assuming equal branching fractions for {\mathrm{T}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W} , \mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z} , \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} decays (left). Discovery potential at three and five standard deviations for T quark pairs, as a function of the T quark mass and the integrated luminosity (right). Figures adapted from Ref. [170].

png pdf
Figure 47:
Example processes illustrating production and decay of doublet (left) and singlet (right) VLL pairs at the LHC that result in multilepton final states.

png pdf
Figure 47-a:
Example processes illustrating production and decay of doublet (left) and singlet (right) VLL pairs at the LHC that result in multilepton final states.

png pdf
Figure 47-b:
Example processes illustrating production and decay of doublet (left) and singlet (right) VLL pairs at the LHC that result in multilepton final states.

png pdf
Figure 48:
Example diagrams showing s -channel EW production of VLL pairs through SM bosons, as expected at the LHC (left two diagrams). In these diagrams, L represents either the neutral VLL, N, or the charged VLL, E. The VLL decays are mediated by a vector leptoquark U (right two diagrams). In the 4321 model, these decays are primarily to third-generation leptons and quarks.

png pdf
Figure 48-a:
Example diagrams showing s -channel EW production of VLL pairs through SM bosons, as expected at the LHC (left two diagrams). In these diagrams, L represents either the neutral VLL, N, or the charged VLL, E. The VLL decays are mediated by a vector leptoquark U (right two diagrams). In the 4321 model, these decays are primarily to third-generation leptons and quarks.

png pdf
Figure 48-b:
Example diagrams showing s -channel EW production of VLL pairs through SM bosons, as expected at the LHC (left two diagrams). In these diagrams, L represents either the neutral VLL, N, or the charged VLL, E. The VLL decays are mediated by a vector leptoquark U (right two diagrams). In the 4321 model, these decays are primarily to third-generation leptons and quarks.

png pdf
Figure 48-c:
Example diagrams showing s -channel EW production of VLL pairs through SM bosons, as expected at the LHC (left two diagrams). In these diagrams, L represents either the neutral VLL, N, or the charged VLL, E. The VLL decays are mediated by a vector leptoquark U (right two diagrams). In the 4321 model, these decays are primarily to third-generation leptons and quarks.

png pdf
Figure 48-d:
Example diagrams showing s -channel EW production of VLL pairs through SM bosons, as expected at the LHC (left two diagrams). In these diagrams, L represents either the neutral VLL, N, or the charged VLL, E. The VLL decays are mediated by a vector leptoquark U (right two diagrams). In the 4321 model, these decays are primarily to third-generation leptons and quarks.

png pdf
Figure 49:
The L_{\mathrm{T}} distribution in 3 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu , 2 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu1\tau_\mathrm{h} , and 1 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu2\tau_\mathrm{h} events (left), and the invariant mass distribution of the OS different-flavor ( m_{\text{OSDF}} ) light lepton and tau lepton pair in 2 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu1\tau_\mathrm{h} and 1 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu2\tau_\mathrm{h} events (right). The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of vector-like leptons coupled to third-generation SM leptons in the doublet scenario for a VLL mass of 1 TeV, before the fit, is overlaid. The signal yield is scaled by a factor of 10 for visualization purposes. Figures adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 49-a:
The L_{\mathrm{T}} distribution in 3 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu , 2 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu1\tau_\mathrm{h} , and 1 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu2\tau_\mathrm{h} events (left), and the invariant mass distribution of the OS different-flavor ( m_{\text{OSDF}} ) light lepton and tau lepton pair in 2 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu1\tau_\mathrm{h} and 1 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu2\tau_\mathrm{h} events (right). The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of vector-like leptons coupled to third-generation SM leptons in the doublet scenario for a VLL mass of 1 TeV, before the fit, is overlaid. The signal yield is scaled by a factor of 10 for visualization purposes. Figures adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 49-b:
The L_{\mathrm{T}} distribution in 3 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu , 2 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu1\tau_\mathrm{h} , and 1 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu2\tau_\mathrm{h} events (left), and the invariant mass distribution of the OS different-flavor ( m_{\text{OSDF}} ) light lepton and tau lepton pair in 2 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu1\tau_\mathrm{h} and 1 \mkern1mu\mathrm{e}\mkern-2mu/\mkern-3mu\mu2\tau_\mathrm{h} events (right). The rightmost bin contains the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of vector-like leptons coupled to third-generation SM leptons in the doublet scenario for a VLL mass of 1 TeV, before the fit, is overlaid. The signal yield is scaled by a factor of 10 for visualization purposes. Figures adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 50:
The \textitVLL-H BDT regions for the four-lepton channels for the full Run 2 data set. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total expected background prediction. The gray band on the ratio represents the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background prediction. The expected SM background distributions and the uncertainties are shown after fitting the data under the background-only hypothesis. For illustration, an example signal hypothesis for the production of the vector-like leptons coupled to the third generation SM leptons in the doublet scenario for a VLL mass of 900 GeV, before the fit, is overlaid. The signal yield is scaled by a factor of 10 for visualization purposes. Figure adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 51:
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like leptons coupled to third-generation SM leptons in the doublet model (left) and singlet model (right). For the doublet vector-like lepton model, to the left of the vertical dashed gray line, the limits are shown from the model-independent scheme, while to the right the limits are shown from the model dependent BDT regions. For the singlet vector-like lepton model, the limit is shown from the model-independent scheme for all masses. Figures adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 51-a:
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like leptons coupled to third-generation SM leptons in the doublet model (left) and singlet model (right). For the doublet vector-like lepton model, to the left of the vertical dashed gray line, the limits are shown from the model-independent scheme, while to the right the limits are shown from the model dependent BDT regions. For the singlet vector-like lepton model, the limit is shown from the model-independent scheme for all masses. Figures adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 51-b:
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for the vector-like leptons coupled to third-generation SM leptons in the doublet model (left) and singlet model (right). For the doublet vector-like lepton model, to the left of the vertical dashed gray line, the limits are shown from the model-independent scheme, while to the right the limits are shown from the model dependent BDT regions. For the singlet vector-like lepton model, the limit is shown from the model-independent scheme for all masses. Figures adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 52:
Postfit distributions for the 2018 data set in the 1 \tau_\mathrm{h} (left) and 2 \tau_\mathrm{h} (right) channels. The upper row shows the background-only fit and the lower row shows the fit including the signal. Not shown here, but included in the fit, are the 2017 data and the 0 \tau_\mathrm{h} channel. Figures taken from Ref. [205].

png pdf
Figure 52-a:
Postfit distributions for the 2018 data set in the 1 \tau_\mathrm{h} (left) and 2 \tau_\mathrm{h} (right) channels. The upper row shows the background-only fit and the lower row shows the fit including the signal. Not shown here, but included in the fit, are the 2017 data and the 0 \tau_\mathrm{h} channel. Figures taken from Ref. [205].

png pdf
Figure 52-b:
Postfit distributions for the 2018 data set in the 1 \tau_\mathrm{h} (left) and 2 \tau_\mathrm{h} (right) channels. The upper row shows the background-only fit and the lower row shows the fit including the signal. Not shown here, but included in the fit, are the 2017 data and the 0 \tau_\mathrm{h} channel. Figures taken from Ref. [205].

png pdf
Figure 52-c:
Postfit distributions for the 2018 data set in the 1 \tau_\mathrm{h} (left) and 2 \tau_\mathrm{h} (right) channels. The upper row shows the background-only fit and the lower row shows the fit including the signal. Not shown here, but included in the fit, are the 2017 data and the 0 \tau_\mathrm{h} channel. Figures taken from Ref. [205].

png pdf
Figure 52-d:
Postfit distributions for the 2018 data set in the 1 \tau_\mathrm{h} (left) and 2 \tau_\mathrm{h} (right) channels. The upper row shows the background-only fit and the lower row shows the fit including the signal. Not shown here, but included in the fit, are the 2017 data and the 0 \tau_\mathrm{h} channel. Figures taken from Ref. [205].

png pdf
Figure 53:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the VLL pair production cross section and the branching fraction to third-generation quarks and leptons, combining the 2017 and 2018 data and all \tau_\mathrm{h} multiplicity channels. The theoretical prediction in the 4321 model for EW production of VLLs is also shown. Figure adapted from Ref. [205].

png pdf
Figure 54:
Expected HL-LHC exclusion limits for vector-like leptons coupled to first-generation (upper row), second-generation (middle row), and third-generation SM leptons (lower row) in the doublet model (left) and the singlet model (right). For both models, limits are calculated using L_{\mathrm{T}}+p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} from the model independent SRs for all masses.

png pdf
Figure 54-a:
Expected HL-LHC exclusion limits for vector-like leptons coupled to first-generation (upper row), second-generation (middle row), and third-generation SM leptons (lower row) in the doublet model (left) and the singlet model (right). For both models, limits are calculated using L_{\mathrm{T}}+p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} from the model independent SRs for all masses.

png pdf
Figure 54-b:
Expected HL-LHC exclusion limits for vector-like leptons coupled to first-generation (upper row), second-generation (middle row), and third-generation SM leptons (lower row) in the doublet model (left) and the singlet model (right). For both models, limits are calculated using L_{\mathrm{T}}+p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} from the model independent SRs for all masses.

png pdf
Figure 54-c:
Expected HL-LHC exclusion limits for vector-like leptons coupled to first-generation (upper row), second-generation (middle row), and third-generation SM leptons (lower row) in the doublet model (left) and the singlet model (right). For both models, limits are calculated using L_{\mathrm{T}}+p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} from the model independent SRs for all masses.

png pdf
Figure 54-d:
Expected HL-LHC exclusion limits for vector-like leptons coupled to first-generation (upper row), second-generation (middle row), and third-generation SM leptons (lower row) in the doublet model (left) and the singlet model (right). For both models, limits are calculated using L_{\mathrm{T}}+p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} from the model independent SRs for all masses.

png pdf
Figure 54-e:
Expected HL-LHC exclusion limits for vector-like leptons coupled to first-generation (upper row), second-generation (middle row), and third-generation SM leptons (lower row) in the doublet model (left) and the singlet model (right). For both models, limits are calculated using L_{\mathrm{T}}+p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} from the model independent SRs for all masses.

png pdf
Figure 54-f:
Expected HL-LHC exclusion limits for vector-like leptons coupled to first-generation (upper row), second-generation (middle row), and third-generation SM leptons (lower row) in the doublet model (left) and the singlet model (right). For both models, limits are calculated using L_{\mathrm{T}}+p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} from the model independent SRs for all masses.

png pdf
Figure 55:
Representative Feynman diagram of a Majorana HNL, labeled as \mathrm{N} , produced through the decay of a W or Z boson.

png pdf
Figure 56:
Representative Feynman diagram of a Majorana HNL, labeled as \mathrm{N} , produced through the \mathrm{W}\gamma fusion process and with two charged leptons and jets in the final state.

png pdf
Figure 57:
Representative Feynman diagram showing the semileptonic decay of a {\mathrm{B}} meson into the primary lepton (\ell_{\mathrm{P}}), a hadronic system ( \mathrm{X} ), and a neutrino, which contains the admixture of an HNL. The HNL propagates and decays weakly into a charged lepton \ell^{\pm} and a charged pion \pi^{\mp} .

png pdf
Figure 58:
Example Feynman diagrams of VBF processes with heavy Majorana neutrino production (left) and processes mediated by the Weinberg operator (right).

png pdf
Figure 58-a:
Example Feynman diagrams of VBF processes with heavy Majorana neutrino production (left) and processes mediated by the Weinberg operator (right).

png pdf
Figure 58-b:
Example Feynman diagrams of VBF processes with heavy Majorana neutrino production (left) and processes mediated by the Weinberg operator (right).

png pdf
Figure 59:
Example Feynman diagrams illustrating production and decay of Type III seesaw heavy lepton \Sigma pairs at the LHC that may result in multilepton final states.

png pdf
Figure 59-a:
Example Feynman diagrams illustrating production and decay of Type III seesaw heavy lepton \Sigma pairs at the LHC that may result in multilepton final states.

png pdf
Figure 59-b:
Example Feynman diagrams illustrating production and decay of Type III seesaw heavy lepton \Sigma pairs at the LHC that may result in multilepton final states.

png pdf
Figure 60:
Representative Feynman diagrams for the production of a heavy Majorana neutrino, labeled as \mathrm{N} \ell, via the decay of a \mathrm{W_R} (left) and \mathrm{Z}^{'} boson (right).

png pdf
Figure 60-a:
Representative Feynman diagrams for the production of a heavy Majorana neutrino, labeled as \mathrm{N} \ell, via the decay of a \mathrm{W_R} (left) and \mathrm{Z}^{'} boson (right).

png pdf
Figure 60-b:
Representative Feynman diagrams for the production of a heavy Majorana neutrino, labeled as \mathrm{N} \ell, via the decay of a \mathrm{W_R} (left) and \mathrm{Z}^{'} boson (right).

png pdf
Figure 61:
The fermion interaction as a sum of gauge (center) and contact (right) interaction contributions.

png pdf
Figure 62:
Example diagrams for the decay of a heavy composite Majorana neutrino to \ell\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} .

png pdf
Figure 63:
Expected (observed) upper limits at 95% CL shown with a dashed (solid) black line, derived on heavy neutrino mixing parameters |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} , |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} , and | V_{\mathrm{eN}}V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}^\ast|^2/(|V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^2+|V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^2) as functions of the HNL mass. The dashed brown line in the upper two figures shows constraints from Electroweak Precision Data (EWPD) [254] on the |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} and |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} parameters. The lower figure, reproduced from Ref. [252], does not show the corresponding EWPD limits. The upper limits from other direct searches at the DELPHI experiment [255], the L3 experiment [256,257], and the ATLAS experiment [258] are superimposed. Also shown are the upper limits from the CMS experiment at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV using the 2012 data set [253] with a solid red line, and the search in the trilepton final state [259] based on the same 2016 data set as used in this analysis with a dashed red line. Figures adapted from Ref. [252].

png pdf
Figure 63-a:
Expected (observed) upper limits at 95% CL shown with a dashed (solid) black line, derived on heavy neutrino mixing parameters |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} , |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} , and | V_{\mathrm{eN}}V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}^\ast|^2/(|V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^2+|V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^2) as functions of the HNL mass. The dashed brown line in the upper two figures shows constraints from Electroweak Precision Data (EWPD) [254] on the |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} and |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} parameters. The lower figure, reproduced from Ref. [252], does not show the corresponding EWPD limits. The upper limits from other direct searches at the DELPHI experiment [255], the L3 experiment [256,257], and the ATLAS experiment [258] are superimposed. Also shown are the upper limits from the CMS experiment at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV using the 2012 data set [253] with a solid red line, and the search in the trilepton final state [259] based on the same 2016 data set as used in this analysis with a dashed red line. Figures adapted from Ref. [252].

png pdf
Figure 63-b:
Expected (observed) upper limits at 95% CL shown with a dashed (solid) black line, derived on heavy neutrino mixing parameters |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} , |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} , and | V_{\mathrm{eN}}V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}^\ast|^2/(|V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^2+|V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^2) as functions of the HNL mass. The dashed brown line in the upper two figures shows constraints from Electroweak Precision Data (EWPD) [254] on the |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} and |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} parameters. The lower figure, reproduced from Ref. [252], does not show the corresponding EWPD limits. The upper limits from other direct searches at the DELPHI experiment [255], the L3 experiment [256,257], and the ATLAS experiment [258] are superimposed. Also shown are the upper limits from the CMS experiment at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV using the 2012 data set [253] with a solid red line, and the search in the trilepton final state [259] based on the same 2016 data set as used in this analysis with a dashed red line. Figures adapted from Ref. [252].

png pdf
Figure 63-c:
Expected (observed) upper limits at 95% CL shown with a dashed (solid) black line, derived on heavy neutrino mixing parameters |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} , |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} , and | V_{\mathrm{eN}}V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}^\ast|^2/(|V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^2+|V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^2) as functions of the HNL mass. The dashed brown line in the upper two figures shows constraints from Electroweak Precision Data (EWPD) [254] on the |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} and |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} parameters. The lower figure, reproduced from Ref. [252], does not show the corresponding EWPD limits. The upper limits from other direct searches at the DELPHI experiment [255], the L3 experiment [256,257], and the ATLAS experiment [258] are superimposed. Also shown are the upper limits from the CMS experiment at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV using the 2012 data set [253] with a solid red line, and the search in the trilepton final state [259] based on the same 2016 data set as used in this analysis with a dashed red line. Figures adapted from Ref. [252].

png pdf
Figure 64:
Expected (observed) upper limits at 95% CL derived on heavy neutrino mixing parameters |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} , |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} , and \mixparsq \tau \mathrm{N} as functions of the HNL mass m_{\mathrm{N}} . No exclusion limit is evaluated for the range 75 < m_{\mathrm{N}} < 85 GeV, where HNL production through W boson decays has a resonance and the analysis strategy changes from using the low- or high-mass region. The area above the solid (dashed) black curve indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region. The upper limits from other direct searches at the DELPHI experiment [255] and the CMS experiment [259,261,262,263] are superimposed. Figures taken from Ref. [260].

png pdf
Figure 64-a:
Expected (observed) upper limits at 95% CL derived on heavy neutrino mixing parameters |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} , |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} , and \mixparsq \tau \mathrm{N} as functions of the HNL mass m_{\mathrm{N}} . No exclusion limit is evaluated for the range 75 < m_{\mathrm{N}} < 85 GeV, where HNL production through W boson decays has a resonance and the analysis strategy changes from using the low- or high-mass region. The area above the solid (dashed) black curve indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region. The upper limits from other direct searches at the DELPHI experiment [255] and the CMS experiment [259,261,262,263] are superimposed. Figures taken from Ref. [260].

png pdf
Figure 64-b:
Expected (observed) upper limits at 95% CL derived on heavy neutrino mixing parameters |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} , |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} , and \mixparsq \tau \mathrm{N} as functions of the HNL mass m_{\mathrm{N}} . No exclusion limit is evaluated for the range 75 < m_{\mathrm{N}} < 85 GeV, where HNL production through W boson decays has a resonance and the analysis strategy changes from using the low- or high-mass region. The area above the solid (dashed) black curve indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region. The upper limits from other direct searches at the DELPHI experiment [255] and the CMS experiment [259,261,262,263] are superimposed. Figures taken from Ref. [260].

png pdf
Figure 64-c:
Expected (observed) upper limits at 95% CL derived on heavy neutrino mixing parameters |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} , |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} , and \mixparsq \tau \mathrm{N} as functions of the HNL mass m_{\mathrm{N}} . No exclusion limit is evaluated for the range 75 < m_{\mathrm{N}} < 85 GeV, where HNL production through W boson decays has a resonance and the analysis strategy changes from using the low- or high-mass region. The area above the solid (dashed) black curve indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region. The upper limits from other direct searches at the DELPHI experiment [255] and the CMS experiment [259,261,262,263] are superimposed. Figures taken from Ref. [260].

png pdf
Figure 65:
Upper limits on |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} at 95% CL as a function of m_{\mathrm{N}} . The black dashed curve shows the median expected upper limit, while the inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The solid black curve is the observed upper limit [262]. The red dashed curve displays the observed upper limits from Ref. [259], while the blue dashed curve shows the observed upper limits from Ref. [252]. Figure adapted from Ref. [262].

png pdf
Figure 66:
Expected and observed background yields in 48 categories for resolved (left) and boosted (right) events. Two benchmark HNL scenarios are overlaid with masses of 4.5 and 10 GeV, and proper decay lengths of c\tau_{\mathrm{N}}= 100 and 1 \,\text{mm} , respectively. The d_{xy}^{\text{sig}} quantity is the significance of the impact parameter of the second lepton track. Figures taken from Ref. [263].

png pdf
Figure 66-a:
Expected and observed background yields in 48 categories for resolved (left) and boosted (right) events. Two benchmark HNL scenarios are overlaid with masses of 4.5 and 10 GeV, and proper decay lengths of c\tau_{\mathrm{N}}= 100 and 1 \,\text{mm} , respectively. The d_{xy}^{\text{sig}} quantity is the significance of the impact parameter of the second lepton track. Figures taken from Ref. [263].

png pdf
Figure 66-b:
Expected and observed background yields in 48 categories for resolved (left) and boosted (right) events. Two benchmark HNL scenarios are overlaid with masses of 4.5 and 10 GeV, and proper decay lengths of c\tau_{\mathrm{N}}= 100 and 1 \,\text{mm} , respectively. The d_{xy}^{\text{sig}} quantity is the significance of the impact parameter of the second lepton track. Figures taken from Ref. [263].

png pdf
Figure 67:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the mass (left) and the proper lifetime (right) for Majorana HNL production with c\tau_{\mathrm{N}}=1\,\text{mm} and m_{\mathrm{N}}= 4.5 GeV, respectively, as functions of the relative coupling strengths to electrons ( f_{\mathrm{e}} ), muons ( f_{\mu} ), and tau leptons ( f_{\tau} ). Figures adapted from Ref. [263].

png pdf
Figure 67-a:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the mass (left) and the proper lifetime (right) for Majorana HNL production with c\tau_{\mathrm{N}}=1\,\text{mm} and m_{\mathrm{N}}= 4.5 GeV, respectively, as functions of the relative coupling strengths to electrons ( f_{\mathrm{e}} ), muons ( f_{\mu} ), and tau leptons ( f_{\tau} ). Figures adapted from Ref. [263].

png pdf
Figure 67-b:
Observed 95% CL lower limits on the mass (left) and the proper lifetime (right) for Majorana HNL production with c\tau_{\mathrm{N}}=1\,\text{mm} and m_{\mathrm{N}}= 4.5 GeV, respectively, as functions of the relative coupling strengths to electrons ( f_{\mathrm{e}} ), muons ( f_{\mu} ), and tau leptons ( f_{\tau} ). Figures adapted from Ref. [263].

png pdf
Figure 68:
Comparison between the number of observed events in data and the background predictions (filled histograms) in the SR for \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{X} (upper) and \mu\mu\mathrm{X} (lower) final states. The hatched band indicates the total systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panels indicate the ratio between the observed data and the prediction, where missing points indicate that the ratio lies outside the axis range. Predictions for signal events are shown for several benchmark hypotheses for Majorana HNL production: m_{\mathrm{N}}= 2 GeV and |V_{\mathrm{\ell N}}|^{2} = 0.8\times10^{-4} (HNL2), m_{\mathrm{N}}= 6 GeV and |V_{\mathrm{\ell N}}|^{2} = 1.3\times10^{-6} (HNL6), m_{\mathrm{N}}= 12 GeV and |V_{\mathrm{\ell N}}|^{2} = 1.0\times10^{-6} $ (HNL12). Small contributions from background processes that are estimated from simulation are collectively referred to as ``Other''. Figures taken from Ref. [261].

png pdf
Figure 68-a:
Comparison between the number of observed events in data and the background predictions (filled histograms) in the SR for \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{X} (upper) and \mu\mu\mathrm{X} (lower) final states. The hatched band indicates the total systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panels indicate the ratio between the observed data and the prediction, where missing points indicate that the ratio lies outside the axis range. Predictions for signal events are shown for several benchmark hypotheses for Majorana HNL production: m_{\mathrm{N}}= 2 GeV and |V_{\mathrm{\ell N}}|^{2} = 0.8\times10^{-4} (HNL2), m_{\mathrm{N}}= 6 GeV and |V_{\mathrm{\ell N}}|^{2} = 1.3\times10^{-6} (HNL6), m_{\mathrm{N}}= 12 GeV and |V_{\mathrm{\ell N}}|^{2} = 1.0\times10^{-6} $ (HNL12). Small contributions from background processes that are estimated from simulation are collectively referred to as ``Other''. Figures taken from Ref. [261].

png pdf
Figure 68-b:
Comparison between the number of observed events in data and the background predictions (filled histograms) in the SR for \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{X} (upper) and \mu\mu\mathrm{X} (lower) final states. The hatched band indicates the total systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panels indicate the ratio between the observed data and the prediction, where missing points indicate that the ratio lies outside the axis range. Predictions for signal events are shown for several benchmark hypotheses for Majorana HNL production: m_{\mathrm{N}}= 2 GeV and |V_{\mathrm{\ell N}}|^{2} = 0.8\times10^{-4} (HNL2), m_{\mathrm{N}}= 6 GeV and |V_{\mathrm{\ell N}}|^{2} = 1.3\times10^{-6} (HNL6), m_{\mathrm{N}}= 12 GeV and |V_{\mathrm{\ell N}}|^{2} = 1.0\times10^{-6} $ (HNL12). Small contributions from background processes that are estimated from simulation are collectively referred to as ``Other''. Figures taken from Ref. [261].

png pdf
Figure 69:
The limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} (left) and |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} (right) as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} for a Majorana (upper) or Dirac (lower) HNL. The area inside the solid (dashed) black curve indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region. Results from the DELPHI [255] and the CMS [259,252] Collaborations are shown as upper limits, i.e.,, the area above the curves indicates the respective observed exclusion region. Figures adapted from Ref. [261].

png pdf
Figure 69-a:
The limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} (left) and |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} (right) as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} for a Majorana (upper) or Dirac (lower) HNL. The area inside the solid (dashed) black curve indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region. Results from the DELPHI [255] and the CMS [259,252] Collaborations are shown as upper limits, i.e.,, the area above the curves indicates the respective observed exclusion region. Figures adapted from Ref. [261].

png pdf
Figure 69-b:
The limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} (left) and |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} (right) as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} for a Majorana (upper) or Dirac (lower) HNL. The area inside the solid (dashed) black curve indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region. Results from the DELPHI [255] and the CMS [259,252] Collaborations are shown as upper limits, i.e.,, the area above the curves indicates the respective observed exclusion region. Figures adapted from Ref. [261].

png pdf
Figure 69-c:
The limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} (left) and |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} (right) as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} for a Majorana (upper) or Dirac (lower) HNL. The area inside the solid (dashed) black curve indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region. Results from the DELPHI [255] and the CMS [259,252] Collaborations are shown as upper limits, i.e.,, the area above the curves indicates the respective observed exclusion region. Figures adapted from Ref. [261].

png pdf
Figure 69-d:
The limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{eN}}|^{2} (left) and |V_{\mathrm{\mu N}}|^{2} (right) as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} for a Majorana (upper) or Dirac (lower) HNL. The area inside the solid (dashed) black curve indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region. Results from the DELPHI [255] and the CMS [259,252] Collaborations are shown as upper limits, i.e.,, the area above the curves indicates the respective observed exclusion region. Figures adapted from Ref. [261].

png pdf
Figure 70:
Expected and observed number of events in the SR of different event categories. Signal yields of a Majorana HNL with a mass of 2 GeV and with a proper decay length of 1 m are overlaid on top of the expected background estimated using the ABCD method. Figure taken from Ref. [270].

png pdf
Figure 71:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL on Majorana HNL production as functions of the HNL mass ( m_{\mathrm{N}} ), and assuming mixing of the HNL with only one generation. The limits are shown for pure electron mixing (upper left), pure muon mixing (upper right), and pure tau neutrino mixing (lower). The limits in the tau neutrino mixing scenario are obtained by combining the results from the electron and muon decay channels of the tau lepton. Figures adapted from Ref. [270].

png pdf
Figure 71-a:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL on Majorana HNL production as functions of the HNL mass ( m_{\mathrm{N}} ), and assuming mixing of the HNL with only one generation. The limits are shown for pure electron mixing (upper left), pure muon mixing (upper right), and pure tau neutrino mixing (lower). The limits in the tau neutrino mixing scenario are obtained by combining the results from the electron and muon decay channels of the tau lepton. Figures adapted from Ref. [270].

png pdf
Figure 71-b:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL on Majorana HNL production as functions of the HNL mass ( m_{\mathrm{N}} ), and assuming mixing of the HNL with only one generation. The limits are shown for pure electron mixing (upper left), pure muon mixing (upper right), and pure tau neutrino mixing (lower). The limits in the tau neutrino mixing scenario are obtained by combining the results from the electron and muon decay channels of the tau lepton. Figures adapted from Ref. [270].

png pdf
Figure 71-c:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% CL on Majorana HNL production as functions of the HNL mass ( m_{\mathrm{N}} ), and assuming mixing of the HNL with only one generation. The limits are shown for pure electron mixing (upper left), pure muon mixing (upper right), and pure tau neutrino mixing (lower). The limits in the tau neutrino mixing scenario are obtained by combining the results from the electron and muon decay channels of the tau lepton. Figures adapted from Ref. [270].

png pdf
Figure 72:
Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{N}}|^{2} as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} , in the Majorana (left column) and Dirac (right column) scenarios. The limits are shown for the mixing scenarios (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(0,1,0) (upper row) and (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(1/3,1/3,1/3) (lower row). Results from the CMS [261,270,263], ATLAS [265], LHCb [276], and Belle [277] Collaborations are superimposed for comparison. The mass range with no results shown corresponds to a vetoed region around the \mathrm{D^0} mass. Figures taken from Ref. [220].

png pdf
Figure 72-a:
Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{N}}|^{2} as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} , in the Majorana (left column) and Dirac (right column) scenarios. The limits are shown for the mixing scenarios (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(0,1,0) (upper row) and (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(1/3,1/3,1/3) (lower row). Results from the CMS [261,270,263], ATLAS [265], LHCb [276], and Belle [277] Collaborations are superimposed for comparison. The mass range with no results shown corresponds to a vetoed region around the \mathrm{D^0} mass. Figures taken from Ref. [220].

png pdf
Figure 72-b:
Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{N}}|^{2} as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} , in the Majorana (left column) and Dirac (right column) scenarios. The limits are shown for the mixing scenarios (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(0,1,0) (upper row) and (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(1/3,1/3,1/3) (lower row). Results from the CMS [261,270,263], ATLAS [265], LHCb [276], and Belle [277] Collaborations are superimposed for comparison. The mass range with no results shown corresponds to a vetoed region around the \mathrm{D^0} mass. Figures taken from Ref. [220].

png pdf
Figure 72-c:
Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{N}}|^{2} as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} , in the Majorana (left column) and Dirac (right column) scenarios. The limits are shown for the mixing scenarios (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(0,1,0) (upper row) and (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(1/3,1/3,1/3) (lower row). Results from the CMS [261,270,263], ATLAS [265], LHCb [276], and Belle [277] Collaborations are superimposed for comparison. The mass range with no results shown corresponds to a vetoed region around the \mathrm{D^0} mass. Figures taken from Ref. [220].

png pdf
Figure 72-d:
Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on |V_{\mathrm{N}}|^{2} as functions of m_{\mathrm{N}} , in the Majorana (left column) and Dirac (right column) scenarios. The limits are shown for the mixing scenarios (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(0,1,0) (upper row) and (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau})=(1/3,1/3,1/3) (lower row). Results from the CMS [261,270,263], ATLAS [265], LHCb [276], and Belle [277] Collaborations are superimposed for comparison. The mass range with no results shown corresponds to a vetoed region around the \mathrm{D^0} mass. Figures taken from Ref. [220].

png pdf
Figure 73:
Observed limits at 95% CL on c\tau_{\mathrm{N}} as a function of the mixing ratios (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau}) for m_{\mathrm{N}}= 1 GeV in the Majorana (left) and Dirac (right) scenarios. The red crosses indicate that there is no exclusion found for that point. The orientation of the value markers on each axis identifies the associated internal lines on the plot. Figures taken from Ref. [220].

png pdf
Figure 73-a:
Observed limits at 95% CL on c\tau_{\mathrm{N}} as a function of the mixing ratios (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau}) for m_{\mathrm{N}}= 1 GeV in the Majorana (left) and Dirac (right) scenarios. The red crosses indicate that there is no exclusion found for that point. The orientation of the value markers on each axis identifies the associated internal lines on the plot. Figures taken from Ref. [220].

png pdf
Figure 73-b:
Observed limits at 95% CL on c\tau_{\mathrm{N}} as a function of the mixing ratios (r_{\mathrm{e}},r_{\mu},r_{\tau}) for m_{\mathrm{N}}= 1 GeV in the Majorana (left) and Dirac (right) scenarios. The red crosses indicate that there is no exclusion found for that point. The orientation of the value markers on each axis identifies the associated internal lines on the plot. Figures taken from Ref. [220].

png pdf
Figure 74:
Summary of searches at the CMS experiment for long-lived HNLs in the Type I seesaw model. The observed limits at 95% CL on the mixing parameter \mixparsq\ell \mathrm{N} as a function of the HNL mass m_{\mathrm{N}} are shown, for Majorana and Dirac HNLs (upper and lower row, respectively), and in the muon and electron channel (left and right column, respectively).

png pdf
Figure 74-a:
Summary of searches at the CMS experiment for long-lived HNLs in the Type I seesaw model. The observed limits at 95% CL on the mixing parameter \mixparsq\ell \mathrm{N} as a function of the HNL mass m_{\mathrm{N}} are shown, for Majorana and Dirac HNLs (upper and lower row, respectively), and in the muon and electron channel (left and right column, respectively).

png pdf
Figure 74-b:
Summary of searches at the CMS experiment for long-lived HNLs in the Type I seesaw model. The observed limits at 95% CL on the mixing parameter \mixparsq\ell \mathrm{N} as a function of the HNL mass m_{\mathrm{N}} are shown, for Majorana and Dirac HNLs (upper and lower row, respectively), and in the muon and electron channel (left and right column, respectively).

png pdf
Figure 74-c:
Summary of searches at the CMS experiment for long-lived HNLs in the Type I seesaw model. The observed limits at 95% CL on the mixing parameter \mixparsq\ell \mathrm{N} as a function of the HNL mass m_{\mathrm{N}} are shown, for Majorana and Dirac HNLs (upper and lower row, respectively), and in the muon and electron channel (left and right column, respectively).

png pdf
Figure 74-d:
Summary of searches at the CMS experiment for long-lived HNLs in the Type I seesaw model. The observed limits at 95% CL on the mixing parameter \mixparsq\ell \mathrm{N} as a function of the HNL mass m_{\mathrm{N}} are shown, for Majorana and Dirac HNLs (upper and lower row, respectively), and in the muon and electron channel (left and right column, respectively).

png pdf
Figure 75:
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section for Type III seesaw HNLs in the flavor-democratic scenario using the model-independent schemes and the BDT regions. To the left of the vertical dashed gray line, the limits are shown from the model-independent SR, and to the right the limits are shown obtained using the BDT regions. Figure adapted from Ref. [204]. Production cross sections for the signal model are calculated at NLO plus next-to-leading logarithmic precision, assuming that the heavy leptons are SU(2) triplet fermions [60,61].

png pdf
Figure 76:
Expected (left) and observed (right) lower limits at 95% CL on the mass of Type III seesaw HNLs in the plane defined by \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{e}} and \mathcal{B}_{\tau} , with the constraint that \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{e}}+\mathcal{B}_{\mu}+\mathcal{B}_{\tau}= 1. For \mathcal{B}_{\tau}\geq 0.9, these limits are obtained using the high mass BDT trained assuming \mathcal{B}_{\tau}= 1, and for the other decay branching fraction combinations, the limits use the \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{e}}=\mathcal{B}_{\mu}=\mathcal{B}_{\tau} BDT. Figures adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 76-a:
Expected (left) and observed (right) lower limits at 95% CL on the mass of Type III seesaw HNLs in the plane defined by \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{e}} and \mathcal{B}_{\tau} , with the constraint that \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{e}}+\mathcal{B}_{\mu}+\mathcal{B}_{\tau}= 1. For \mathcal{B}_{\tau}\geq 0.9, these limits are obtained using the high mass BDT trained assuming \mathcal{B}_{\tau}= 1, and for the other decay branching fraction combinations, the limits use the \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{e}}=\mathcal{B}_{\mu}=\mathcal{B}_{\tau} BDT. Figures adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 76-b:
Expected (left) and observed (right) lower limits at 95% CL on the mass of Type III seesaw HNLs in the plane defined by \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{e}} and \mathcal{B}_{\tau} , with the constraint that \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{e}}+\mathcal{B}_{\mu}+\mathcal{B}_{\tau}= 1. For \mathcal{B}_{\tau}\geq 0.9, these limits are obtained using the high mass BDT trained assuming \mathcal{B}_{\tau}= 1, and for the other decay branching fraction combinations, the limits use the \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{e}}=\mathcal{B}_{\mu}=\mathcal{B}_{\tau} BDT. Figures adapted from Ref. [204].

png pdf
Figure 77:
The observed upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the production cross section and the branching fraction of a right-handed \mathrm{W_R} boson divided by the theory expectation for a coupling constant g_{\text{R}} equal to the SM coupling of the \mathrm{W_R} boson ( g_{\text{L}} ), for the electron channel (left) and muon channel (right). The observed exclusion regions are shown for the resolved (solid green), boosted (solid blue), and combined (solid black) channels, together with the expected exclusion region for the combined result (dotted black). The dash-dotted lines represent the 68% coverage of the boundaries of the expected exclusion regions. The observed exclusion regions obtained in the previous search performed by the CMS Collaboration [284] are bounded by the magenta lines. The biggest improvement may be seen in the m_{\mathrm{N}} < 0.5 TeV region, where the new boosted category greatly improves the sensitivity with respect to the previous result. Figures adapted from Ref. [281].

png pdf
Figure 77-a:
The observed upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the production cross section and the branching fraction of a right-handed \mathrm{W_R} boson divided by the theory expectation for a coupling constant g_{\text{R}} equal to the SM coupling of the \mathrm{W_R} boson ( g_{\text{L}} ), for the electron channel (left) and muon channel (right). The observed exclusion regions are shown for the resolved (solid green), boosted (solid blue), and combined (solid black) channels, together with the expected exclusion region for the combined result (dotted black). The dash-dotted lines represent the 68% coverage of the boundaries of the expected exclusion regions. The observed exclusion regions obtained in the previous search performed by the CMS Collaboration [284] are bounded by the magenta lines. The biggest improvement may be seen in the m_{\mathrm{N}} < 0.5 TeV region, where the new boosted category greatly improves the sensitivity with respect to the previous result. Figures adapted from Ref. [281].

png pdf
Figure 77-b:
The observed upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the production cross section and the branching fraction of a right-handed \mathrm{W_R} boson divided by the theory expectation for a coupling constant g_{\text{R}} equal to the SM coupling of the \mathrm{W_R} boson ( g_{\text{L}} ), for the electron channel (left) and muon channel (right). The observed exclusion regions are shown for the resolved (solid green), boosted (solid blue), and combined (solid black) channels, together with the expected exclusion region for the combined result (dotted black). The dash-dotted lines represent the 68% coverage of the boundaries of the expected exclusion regions. The observed exclusion regions obtained in the previous search performed by the CMS Collaboration [284] are bounded by the magenta lines. The biggest improvement may be seen in the m_{\mathrm{N}} < 0.5 TeV region, where the new boosted category greatly improves the sensitivity with respect to the previous result. Figures adapted from Ref. [281].

png pdf
Figure 78:
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the product of cross section and branching fraction, obtained from the combination of the \mathrm{e}\tau_\mathrm{h} and \mu\tau_\mathrm{h} channels (left), and the observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section as functions of the mass m_{\mathrm{W_R}} of the \mathrm{W_R} boson and the mass m_{{{\mathrm{N}}{\tau}} } of the HNL (right). The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band in the left figure indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The dashed dark blue curve in the left figure represents the theoretical prediction for the product of the \mathrm{W_R} boson production cross section and the branching fraction for decay to a \tau lepton and RH neutrino, assuming the mass of the RH neutrino to be half the mass of the \mathrm{W_R} boson. Figures taken from Ref. [285].

png
Figure 78-a:
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the product of cross section and branching fraction, obtained from the combination of the \mathrm{e}\tau_\mathrm{h} and \mu\tau_\mathrm{h} channels (left), and the observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section as functions of the mass m_{\mathrm{W_R}} of the \mathrm{W_R} boson and the mass m_{{{\mathrm{N}}{\tau}} } of the HNL (right). The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band in the left figure indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The dashed dark blue curve in the left figure represents the theoretical prediction for the product of the \mathrm{W_R} boson production cross section and the branching fraction for decay to a \tau lepton and RH neutrino, assuming the mass of the RH neutrino to be half the mass of the \mathrm{W_R} boson. Figures taken from Ref. [285].

png
Figure 78-b:
Observed and expected limits at 95% CL on the product of cross section and branching fraction, obtained from the combination of the \mathrm{e}\tau_\mathrm{h} and \mu\tau_\mathrm{h} channels (left), and the observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section as functions of the mass m_{\mathrm{W_R}} of the \mathrm{W_R} boson and the mass m_{{{\mathrm{N}}{\tau}} } of the HNL (right). The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band in the left figure indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The dashed dark blue curve in the left figure represents the theoretical prediction for the product of the \mathrm{W_R} boson production cross section and the branching fraction for decay to a \tau lepton and RH neutrino, assuming the mass of the RH neutrino to be half the mass of the \mathrm{W_R} boson. Figures taken from Ref. [285].

png pdf
Figure 79:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction for the production of \mathrm{W_R} bosons decaying to { \mathrm{N} \tau as function of the \mathrm{W_R} boson mass (left). The observed (expected) limit is shown as solid (dashed) black lines, and the inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The theoretical cross section is indicated by the solid blue line. Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction for \mathrm{W_R}\to{{\mathrm{N}}{\tau}} \tau as a function of m_{\mathrm{W_R}} and m_{{{\mathrm{N}}{\tau}} }/m_{\mathrm{W_R}} (right). Figures taken from Ref. [286].

png
Figure 79-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction for the production of \mathrm{W_R} bosons decaying to { \mathrm{N} \tau as function of the \mathrm{W_R} boson mass (left). The observed (expected) limit is shown as solid (dashed) black lines, and the inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The theoretical cross section is indicated by the solid blue line. Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction for \mathrm{W_R}\to{{\mathrm{N}}{\tau}} \tau as a function of m_{\mathrm{W_R}} and m_{{{\mathrm{N}}{\tau}} }/m_{\mathrm{W_R}} (right). Figures taken from Ref. [286].

png
Figure 79-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction for the production of \mathrm{W_R} bosons decaying to { \mathrm{N} \tau as function of the \mathrm{W_R} boson mass (left). The observed (expected) limit is shown as solid (dashed) black lines, and the inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The theoretical cross section is indicated by the solid blue line. Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and the branching fraction for \mathrm{W_R}\to{{\mathrm{N}}{\tau}} \tau as a function of m_{\mathrm{W_R}} and m_{{{\mathrm{N}}{\tau}} }/m_{\mathrm{W_R}} (right). Figures taken from Ref. [286].

png pdf
Figure 80:
The observed and expected exclusion limits in the m_{\mathrm{N}} -- m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} parameter space, in the dielectron channel (left) and the dimuon channel (right). Figures adapted from Ref. [289].

png pdf
Figure 80-a:
The observed and expected exclusion limits in the m_{\mathrm{N}} -- m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} parameter space, in the dielectron channel (left) and the dimuon channel (right). Figures adapted from Ref. [289].

png pdf
Figure 80-b:
The observed and expected exclusion limits in the m_{\mathrm{N}} -- m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} parameter space, in the dielectron channel (left) and the dimuon channel (right). Figures adapted from Ref. [289].

png pdf
Figure 81:
Summary of searches at the CMS experiment for Majorana HNLs in the context of the LRSM model. The observed limits at 95% CL in the two-dimensional m_{\mathrm{N}} -- m_{\mathrm{V}} plane are shown in the electron and muon channel (left and right, respectively).

png pdf
Figure 81-a:
Summary of searches at the CMS experiment for Majorana HNLs in the context of the LRSM model. The observed limits at 95% CL in the two-dimensional m_{\mathrm{N}} -- m_{\mathrm{V}} plane are shown in the electron and muon channel (left and right, respectively).

png pdf
Figure 81-b:
Summary of searches at the CMS experiment for Majorana HNLs in the context of the LRSM model. The observed limits at 95% CL in the two-dimensional m_{\mathrm{N}} -- m_{\mathrm{V}} plane are shown in the electron and muon channel (left and right, respectively).

png pdf
Figure 82:
Expected (dashed black) and observed (blue solid) exclusion limits for the \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (left) and \mu\mu\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (right) channels in the search for heavy composite Majorana neutrinos. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures taken from Ref. [290].

png pdf
Figure 82-a:
Expected (dashed black) and observed (blue solid) exclusion limits for the \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (left) and \mu\mu\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (right) channels in the search for heavy composite Majorana neutrinos. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures taken from Ref. [290].

png pdf
Figure 82-b:
Expected (dashed black) and observed (blue solid) exclusion limits for the \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (left) and \mu\mu\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (right) channels in the search for heavy composite Majorana neutrinos. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures taken from Ref. [290].

png pdf
Figure 83:
Expected (dashed black) and observed (blue solid) exclusion limits for the \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (left) and \mu\mu\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (right) channel in the two-dimensional plane m_{{{\mathrm{N}}{\ell}} } -- \Lambda . The solid violet lines represent the fraction of simulated events that satisfy the unitarity condition in the EFT approximation [292] with the various percentages considered. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures taken from Ref. [290].

png pdf
Figure 83-a:
Expected (dashed black) and observed (blue solid) exclusion limits for the \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (left) and \mu\mu\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (right) channel in the two-dimensional plane m_{{{\mathrm{N}}{\ell}} } -- \Lambda . The solid violet lines represent the fraction of simulated events that satisfy the unitarity condition in the EFT approximation [292] with the various percentages considered. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures taken from Ref. [290].

png pdf
Figure 83-b:
Expected (dashed black) and observed (blue solid) exclusion limits for the \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (left) and \mu\mu\mathrm{q}{\overline{\mathrm{q}}{\prime}} (right) channel in the two-dimensional plane m_{{{\mathrm{N}}{\ell}} } -- \Lambda . The solid violet lines represent the fraction of simulated events that satisfy the unitarity condition in the EFT approximation [292] with the various percentages considered. The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Figures taken from Ref. [290].

png pdf
Figure 84:
Coverage in the ( p_{\mathrm{T}} , d_0 ) plane for displaced leptons with the 2016 and 2018 triggers, and the new Run-3 triggers, indicated in light blue, dark blue, and red, respectively [293]. Here, d_0 is the impact parameter of the charged lepton track with respect to the PV in the transverse plane.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
List of VLQ searches performed by the CMS experiment grouped by production mode. In this table, \ell denotes an electron or a muon. Additional jets in the final state are not explicitly listed in the table. The 0\ell channels correspond to the all-hadronic final state. For the 2\ell channels, it is indicated whether the leptons have opposite-sign (OS) or same-sign (SS) charges. For single VLQ searches, the channels are indicated through the decay products of the W, Z, and Higgs bosons, and t quarks.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of event selection criteria for the primary CRs and SRs in the three leptonic search channels. The phrase ``max MLP'' refers to the largest score from the single-lepton multilayer perceptron network. Table taken from Ref. [none-none-none].

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of channels considered for each category and jet multiplicity in the search for {\mathrm{B}} \overline{\mathrm{B}} production that specifically targets {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{Z} and {\mathrm{B}} \to\mathrm{b}\mathrm{H} decays. Table adapted from Ref. [142].
Summary
In this report, the physics program of the CMS experiment has been summarized for searches for physics beyond the standard model (SM) in the context of models that introduce vector-like quarks (VLQs), vector-like leptons (VLLs), and heavy neutral leptons (HNLs). Each of these three model classes provides a complementary perspective on the origin of mass of fundamental particles. The VLQs extend the SM with nonchiral partners of SM quarks, and the searches focus on VLQs that couple to the third-generation quarks. The VLLs, introduced in a class of models that can be particularly sensitive to leptonic anomalies, correspond to an analogous extension of the leptonic sector of the SM. These searches target charged-lepton partners. The HNLs provide yet another perspective on the interplay between chirality and neutrino mass-generating mechanisms, and produce distinct prompt and displaced signatures in the detector. These searches probe unexplored areas of parameter space in several models beyond the SM, using Run 2 proton-proton collision data sets collected by the CMS detector during the years 2015 to 2018 corresponding to an integrated luminosity of up to 138 fb ^{-1} . Two new statistical combinations of searches for VLQs have been performed. Pair production of B quarks with mass below 1.49 TeV is excluded at 95% confidence level for any third-generation decay of the B quark. Single production of T quarks in the narrow-width approximation is excluded at 95% confidence level for T quark masses below 1.20 TeV. No evidence for physics beyond the SM has been observed, and stringent exclusion limits on new fermion masses and couplings have been placed. One search for VLLs, detailed in Section 8.3, shows a modest excess of the observed data over the background-only prediction that requires further investigation using more data. No VLQ and HNL searches report excesses. Using projections in the context of the future High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) and the corresponding upgrades to the CMS detector, an increased discovery reach of new fermions well into the TeVns energy domain is expected. Although the environment of the HL-LHC with many simultaneous collisions will present new challenges for particle reconstruction and identification, searches for new fermions will benefit from the increased collision energy, unprecedented integrated luminosity, and the planned detector upgrades. Many of the searches presented in this report rely on identifying jets from the decays of massive SM particles, or feature high-pseudorapidity jets from t -channel or vector boson fusion production modes. The expansion of the tracker volume and significant upgrades of the endcap calorimeter and muon detectors will provide improved jet reconstruction and identification at high pseudorapidity in the HL-LHC era. There are still unexplored regions of parameter space in various models beyond the SM involving VLQs, VLLs, and HNLs within reach of the LHC, that can yield a first glimpse of new physics in the near or longer term. This includes considering nonminimal VLQ extensions such as decays of VLQs to scalar or pseudoscalar bosons, exploring VLQ production modes such as electroweak pair production, and expanding the searches for VLQs assuming a finite decay width. Manifestations of VLLs in other models and final states than currently probed may also be considered, involving final states with muon detector shower signatures, final states with highly Lorentz-boosted decay products, or vector boson fusion modes of VLL pair production. Future runs of the LHC will bring great opportunities to explore new model phase spaces, detector upgrades will provide improved particle reconstruction, and continued efforts in innovating analysis techniques will further enhance the potential to discover new physics.
References
1 A. Hebecker The standard model and its hierarchy problem(s) in Naturalness, string landscape and multiverse: A modern introduction with exercises, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021
link
2 Super-Kamiokande Collaboration Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos PRL 81 (1998) 1562 hep-ex/9807003
3 SNO Collaboration Measurement of the rate of {\nu_{\!\mathrm{e}}+\mathrm{d}\to\mathrm{p}+\mathrm{p}+\mathrm{e}^-} interactions produced by ^8B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory PRL 87 (2001) 071301 nucl-ex/0106015
4 L. Randall and R. Sundrum A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension PRL 83 (1999) 3370 hep-ph/9905221
5 G.-Y. Huang, K. Kong, and S. C. Park Bounds on the fermion-bulk masses in models with universal extra dimensions JHEP 06 (2012) 099 1204.0522
6 R. Contino, D. Pappadopulo, D. Marzocca, and R. Rattazzi On the effect of resonances in composite Higgs phenomenology JHEP 10 (2011) 081 1109.1570
7 D. Greco and D. Liu Hunting composite vector resonances at the LHC: naturalness facing data JHEP 12 (2014) 126 1410.2883
8 A. Falkowski, D. M. Straub, and A. Vicente Vector-like leptons: Higgs decays and collider phenomenology JHEP 05 (2014) 092 1312.5329
9 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, R. Benbrik, S. Heinemeyer, and M. Pérez-Victoria Handbook of vectorlike quarks: Mixing and single production PRD 88 (2013) 094010 1306.0572
10 R. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation PRL 44 (1980) 912
11 J. Schechter and J. Valle Neutrino masses in \mathrm{SU}(2)\otimes\mathrm{U}(1) theories PRD 22 (1980) 2227
12 R. Foot, H. Lew, X.-G. He, and G. C. Joshi See-saw neutrino masses induced by a triplet of leptons Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441
13 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
14 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
15 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
16 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
17 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
18 CMS Collaboration Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
19 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
20 CMS Collaboration ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run2 summary plots CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2020-021, 2020
CDS
21 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
22 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti- k_{\mathrm{T}} jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
23 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FASTJET user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
24 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
25 D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran Pileup per particle identification JHEP 10 (2014) 059 1407.6013
26 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
27 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
28 E. Bols et al. Jet flavour classification using DeepJet JINST 15 (2020) P12012 2008.10519
29 CMS Collaboration Performance of the DeepJet b tagging algorithm using 41.9 fb ^{-1} of data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with Phase 1 CMS detector CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2018-058, 2018
CDS
30 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of \tau leptons decaying to hadrons and \nu_{\!\tau} in {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
31 CMS Collaboration Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network JINST 17 (2022) P07023 CMS-TAU-20-001
2201.08458
32 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
33 CMS Tracker Group Collaboration The CMS Phase-1 pixel detector upgrade JINST 16 (2021) P02027 2012.14304
34 CMS Collaboration The Phase-2 upgrade of the CMS barrel calorimeters CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2017-011, CMS-TDR-015, 2017
CDS
35 CMS Collaboration The Phase-2 upgrade of the CMS muon detectors CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2017-012, CMS-TDR-016, 2017
CDS
36 CMS Collaboration The Phase-2 upgrade of the CMS endcap calorimeter CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2017-023, CMS-TDR-019, 2017
CDS
37 CMS Collaboration A MIP timing detector for the CMS Phase-2 upgrade CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2019-003, CMS-TDR-020, 2019
CDS
38 CMS Collaboration The Phase-2 upgrade of the CMS Level-1 trigger CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2020-004, CMS-TDR-021, 2020
CDS
39 CMS Collaboration The Phase-2 upgrade of the CMS data acquisition and high level trigger CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2021-007, CMS-TDR-022, 2021
CDS
40 CMS Collaboration Expected performance of the physics objects with the upgraded CMS detector at the HL-LHC CMS Note CMS-NOTE-2018-006, 2018
CDS
41 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
42 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
43 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
44 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
45 T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA8.1 Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
46 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
47 F. del Aguila and M. J. Bowick The possibility of new fermions with {\Delta i=0} mass NPB 224 (1983) 107
48 P. M. Fishbane, R. E. Norton, and M. J. Rivard Experimental implications of heavy, isosinglet quarks and leptons PRD 33 (1986) 2632
49 P. M. Fishbane and P. Q. Hung Lepton masses in a dynamical model of family symmetry Z. Phys. C 38 (1988) 649
50 I. Montvay Three mirror pairs of fermion families PLB 205 (1988) 315
51 K. Fujikawa A vector-like extension of the standard model Prog. Theor. Phys. 92 (1994) 1149 hep-ph/9411258
52 N. Kumar and S. P. Martin Vectorlike leptons at the Large Hadron Collider PRD 92 (2015) 115018 1510.03456
53 P. N. Bhattiprolu and S. P. Martin Prospects for vectorlike leptons at future proton-proton colliders PRD 100 (2019) 015033 1905.00498
54 L. Di Luzio, A. Greljo, and M. Nardecchia Gauge leptoquark as the origin of {\mathrm{B}} -physics anomalies PRD 96 (2017) 115011 1708.08450
55 L. Di Luzio et al. Maximal flavour violation: a Cabibbo mechanism for leptoquarks JHEP 11 (2018) 081 1808.00942
56 M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martín, and G. Isidori A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies PLB 779 (2018) 317 1712.01368
57 A. Greljo and B. A. Stefanek Third family quark-lepton unification at the TeV scale PLB 782 (2018) 131 1802.04274
58 C. Cornella et al. Reading the footprints of the {\mathrm{B}} -meson flavor anomalies JHEP 08 (2021) 050 2103.16558
59 V. Brdar, A. J. Helmboldt, S. Iwamoto, and K. Schmitz Type-I seesaw mechanism as the common origin of neutrino mass, baryon asymmetry, and the electroweak scale PRD 100 (2019) 075029 1905.12634
60 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Gaugino production in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2012) 081 1207.2159
61 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Precision predictions for electroweak superpartner production at hadron colliders with resummino EPJC 73 (2013) 2480 1304.0790
62 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
63 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
64 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG box JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
65 T. Melia, P. Nason, R. Röntsch, and G. Zanderighi {\mathrm{W^+}\mathrm{W^-}} , {\mathrm{W}\mathrm{Z}} and {\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}} production in the POWHEG box JHEP 11 (2011) 078 1107.5051
66 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi {\mathrm{W^+}\mathrm{W^-}} , {\mathrm{W}\mathrm{Z}} and {\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}} production in the POWHEG -box-v2 EPJC 74 (2014) 2702 1311.1365
67 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC in Proc. 10th DESY Workshop on Elementary Particle Theory: Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory (LL): Wörlitz, Germany, 2010
link
1007.3492
68 S. Frixione, G. Ridolfi, and P. Nason A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
69 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s - and t -channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
70 E. Re Single-top {\mathrm{W}\mathrm{t}} -channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
71 Y. Gao et al. Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders PRD 81 (2010) 075022 1001.3396
72 S. Bolognesi et al. On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC PRD 86 (2012) 095031 1208.4018
73 I. Anderson et al. Constraining anomalous {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}} interactions at proton and lepton colliders PRD 89 (2014) 035007 1309.4819
74 A. V. Gritsan, R. Röntsch, M. Schulze, and M. Xiao Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to the heavy-flavor fermions using matrix element techniques PRD 94 (2016) 055023 1606.03107
75 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
76 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
77 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
78 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in PYTHIA8 in the modelling of \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} at \sqrt{s}= 8 and 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2016
CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
79 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
80 S. Höche et al. Matching parton showers and matrix elements in Proc. HERA and the LHC: A Workshop on the Implications of HERA for LHC Physics: Geneva and Hamburg, 2004
link
hep-ph/0602031
81 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
82 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
83 S. D. Ellis, C. K. Vermilion, and J. R. Walsh Recombination algorithms and jet substructure: Pruning as a tool for heavy particle searches PRD 81 (2010) 094023 0912.0033
84 A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler Soft drop JHEP 05 (2014) 146 1402.2657
85 Y. L. Dokshitzer, G. D. Leder, S. Moretti, and B. R. Webber Better jet clustering algorithms JHEP 08 (1997) 001 hep-ph/9707323
86 M. Wobisch and T. Wengler Hadronization corrections to jet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering in Proc. Workshop on Monte Carlo Generators for HERA Physics: Hamburg, 1998
link
hep-ph/9907280
87 J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg Identifying boosted objects with {N} -subjettiness JHEP 03 (2011) 015 1011.2268
88 J. Dolen et al. Thinking outside the ROCs: Designing decorrelated taggers (DDT) for jet substructure JHEP 05 (2016) 156 1603.00027
89 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy, energetic, hadronically decaying particles using machine-learning techniques JINST 15 (2020) P06005 CMS-JME-18-002
2004.08262
90 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV PRD 95 (2017) 092001 CMS-TOP-16-008
1610.04191
91 CMS Collaboration Measurements of \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} differential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV using events containing two leptons JHEP 02 (2019) 149 CMS-TOP-17-014
1811.06625
92 J. Wong Search for pair production of vector-like quarks in leptonic final states in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV at the CMS detector in the LHC PhD thesis, Brown University, 2022
CERN-THESIS-2022-038
93 R. A. Fisher On the interpretation of \chi^2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of {P} J. R. Stat. Soc 85 (1922) 87
94 R. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993) 219
95 J. S. Conway Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra in Proc. 2011 Workshop on Statistical Issues Related to Discovery Claims in Search Experiments and Unfolding (PHYSTAT ): Geneva, 2011
link
1103.0354
96 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
97 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The \text{CL}_\text{s} technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
98 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
99 CMS Collaboration The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: combine Submitted to Comput. Softw. Big Sci, 2024 CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
100 W. Verkerke and D. Kirkby The RooFit toolkit for data modeling in Proc. 13th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP ): La Jolla CA, 2003
eConf C0303241 MOLT007
physics/0306116
101 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, 2011
102 K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol The minimal composite Higgs model NPB 719 (2005) 165 hep-ph/0412089
103 M. Perelstein Little Higgs models and their phenomenology Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 58 (2007) 247 hep-ph/0512128
104 S. P. Martin Extra vectorlike matter and the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in low-energy supersymmetry PRD 81 (2010) 035004 0910.2732
105 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, D. E. López-Fogliani, and C. Muñoz Novel signatures for vector-like quarks JHEP 06 (2017) 095 1705.02526
106 S. Zheng Minimal vectorlike model in supersymmetric unification EPJC 80 (2020) 273 1904.10145
107 O. Eberhardt et al. Joint analysis of Higgs boson decays and electroweak precision observables in the standard model with a sequential fourth generation PRD 86 (2012) 013011 1204.3872
108 R. Contino, T. Kramer, M. Son, and R. Sundrum Warped/composite phenomenology simplified JHEP 05 (2007) 074 hep-ph/0612180
109 C. Bini, R. Contino, and N. Vignaroli Heavy-light decay topologies as a new strategy to discover a heavy gluon JHEP 01 (2012) 157 1110.6058
110 M. Chala, J. Juknevich, G. Perez, and J. Santiago The elusive gluon JHEP 01 (2015) 092 1411.1771
111 G. F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, and R. Rattazzi The strongly-interacting light Higgs JHEP 06 (2007) 045 hep-ph/0703164
112 A. De Simone, O. Matsedonskyi, R. Rattazzi, and A. Wulzer A first top partner hunter's guide JHEP 04 (2013) 004 1211.5663
113 O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico, and A. Wulzer Top partners searches and composite Higgs models JHEP 04 (2016) 003 1512.04356
114 D. Marzocca, M. Serone, and J. Shu General composite Higgs models JHEP 08 (2012) 013 1205.0770
115 A. Pomarol and F. Riva The composite Higgs and light resonance connection JHEP 08 (2012) 135 1205.6434
116 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra Identifying top partners at LHC JHEP 11 (2009) 030 0907.3155
117 A. Deandrea et al. Single production of vector-like quarks: the effects of large width, interference and NLO corrections JHEP 08 (2021) 107 2105.08745
118 B. Fuks and H.-S. Shao QCD next-to-leading-order predictions matched to parton showers for vector-like quark models EPJC 77 (2017) 135 1610.04622
119 G. Cacciapaglia et al. Next-to-leading-order predictions for single vector-like quark production at the LHC PLB 793 (2019) 206 1811.05055
120 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra Mixing with vector-like quarks: constraints and expectations in Proc. 1st Large Hadron Collider Physics Conference (LHCP ): Barcelona, 2013
EPJ Web Conf. 60 (2013) 16012
1306.4432
121 A. Banerjee et al. Phenomenological aspects of composite Higgs scenarios: exotic scalars and vector-like quarks in Proc. 2021 US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass ): Seattle WA, 2021
link
2203.07270
122 A. Banerjee, D. B. Franzosi, and G. Ferretti Modelling vector-like quarks in partial compositeness framework JHEP 03 (2022) 200 2202.00037
123 G. Cacciapaglia, T. Flacke, M. Park, and M. Zhang Exotic decays of top partners: Mind the search gap PLB 798 (2019) 135015 1908.07524
124 R. Benbrik et al. Signatures of vector-like top partners decaying into new neutral scalar or pseudoscalar bosons JHEP 05 (2020) 028 1907.05929
125 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, J. Alonso-González, L. Merlo, and J. M. No Exotic vectorlike quark phenomenology in the minimal linear \sigma model PRD 101 (2020) 035015 1911.10202
126 B. A. Dobrescu and F. Yu Exotic signals of vectorlike quarks JPG 45 (2018) 08LT01 1612.01909
127 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders through \mathcal{O}({\alpha_\mathrm{S}}^4) PRL 110 (2013) 252004 1303.6254
128 O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico, and A. Wulzer On the interpretation of top partners searches JHEP 12 (2014) 097 1409.0100
129 M. Czakon and A. Mitov TOP++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
130 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and F. Tramontano Single top production and decay at next-to-leading order PRD 70 (2004) 094012 hep-ph/0408158
131 A. Carvalho et al. Single production of vectorlike quarks with large width at the Large Hadron Collider PRD 98 (2018) 015029 1805.06402
132 C. Degrande et al. UFO---the universal FeynRules output Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201 1108.2040
133 ATLAS Collaboration Search for single production of a vectorlike T quark decaying into a Higgs boson and top quark with fully hadronic final states using the ATLAS detector PRD 105 (2022) 092012 2201.07045
134 M. Buchkremer, G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, and L. Panizzi Model-independent framework for searches of top partners NPB 876 (2013) 376 1305.4172
135 CMS Collaboration Search for vector-like charge 2/3 T quarks in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV PRD 93 (2016) 012003 1509.04177
136 CMS Collaboration Search for pair-produced vectorlike B quarks in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV PRD 93 (2016) 112009 1507.07129
137 CMS Collaboration Search for vector-like light-flavor quark partners in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV PRD 97 (2018) 072008 1708.02510
138 CMS Collaboration Search for pair production of vector-like quarks in the {\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}\overline{\mathrm{b}}\mathrm{W}} channel from proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PLB 779 (2018) 82 1710.01539
139 CMS Collaboration Search for vector-like quarks in events with two oppositely charged leptons and jets in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV EPJC 79 (2019) 364 1812.09768
140 CMS Collaboration Search for pair production of vector-like quarks in the fully hadronic final state PRD 100 (2019) 072001 1906.11903
141 CMS Collaboration Search for pair production of vector-like quarks in leptonic final states in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2023) 020 2209.07327
142 CMS Collaboration A search for bottom-type vector-like quark pair production in dileptonic and fully hadronic final states in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV Submitted to Phys. Rev. D, 2024 2402.13808
143 CMS Collaboration Search for top quark partners with charge 5/3 in the same-sign dilepton and single-lepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2019) 082 1810.03188
144 CMS Collaboration Search for single production of a vector-like T quark decaying to a Z boson and a top quark in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PLB 781 (2018) 574 1708.01062
145 CMS Collaboration Search for electroweak production of a vector-like T quark using fully hadronic final states JHEP 01 (2020) 036 1909.04721
146 CMS Collaboration Search for single production of a vector-like T quark decaying to a top quark and a Z boson in the final state with jets and missing transverse momentum at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 05 (2022) 093 2201.02227
147 CMS Collaboration Search for a vector-like quark {{\mathrm{T}} ^\prime\to\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}} via the diphoton decay mode of the Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 09 (2023) 057 2302.12802
148 CMS Collaboration Search for production of single vector-like quarks decaying to {\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}} or {\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}} in the all-hadronic final state in {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV Submitted to Phys. Rev. D, 2024 2405.05071
149 CMS Collaboration Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying into a b quark and a W boson in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PLB 772 (2017) 634 1701.08328
150 CMS Collaboration Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying to a b quark and a Higgs boson JHEP 06 (2018) 031 1802.01486
151 CMS Collaboration Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying to a top quark and a W boson in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV EPJC 79 (2019) 90 1809.08597
152 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy resonance decaying to a top quark and a W boson at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV in the fully hadronic final state JHEP 12 (2021) 106 2104.12853
153 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy resonance decaying into a top quark and a W boson in the lepton+jets final state at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 04 (2022) 048 2111.10216
154 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy resonance decaying to a top quark and a vector-like top quark at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 09 (2017) 053 1703.06352
155 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy resonance decaying to a top quark and a vector-like top quark in the lepton+jets final state in {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV EPJC 79 (2019) 208 1812.06489
156 CMS Collaboration Search for a \mathrm{W^{'}} boson decaying to a vector-like quark and a top or bottom quark in the all-jets final state JHEP 03 (2019) 127 1811.07010
157 CMS Collaboration Search for a \mathrm{W^{'}} boson decaying to a vector-like quark and a top or bottom quark in the all-jets final state at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 09 (2022) 088 2202.12988
158 CMS Collaboration Search for vector-like T and B quark pairs in final states with leptons at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 08 (2018) 177 1805.04758
159 CMS Collaboration A search for bottom-type, vector-like quark pair production in a fully hadronic final state in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PRD 102 (2020) 112004 2008.09835
160 S. Banerjee et al. Phenomenological analysis of multi-pseudoscalar mediated dark matter models JHEP 07 (2022) 111 2110.15391
161 A. Carvalho Gravity particles from warped extra dimensions, predictions for LHC 1404.0102
162 CMS Collaboration Measurements of Higgs boson production cross sections and couplings in the diphoton decay channel at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2021) 027 CMS-HIG-19-015
2103.06956
163 H. Voss, A. Höcker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt TMVA, the toolkit for multivariate data analysis with ROOT in Proc. 11th International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACAT ): Amsterdam, 2017
PoS (ACAT2017) 040
physics/0703039
164 P. D. Dauncey, M. Kenzie, N. Wardle, and G. J. Davies Handling uncertainties in background shapes: the discrete profiling method JINST 10 (2015) P04015 1408.6865
165 T. Lapsien, R. Kogler, and J. Haller A new tagger for hadronically decaying heavy particles at the LHC EPJC 76 (2016) 600 1606.04961
166 J. P. Araque, N. F. Castro, and J. Santiago Interpretation of vector-like quark searches: heavy gluons in composite Higgs models JHEP 11 (2015) 120 1507.05628
167 D. Liu, L.-T. Wang, and K.-P. Xie Prospects of searching for composite resonances at the LHC and beyond JHEP 01 (2019) 157 1810.08954
168 A. Deandrea and A. M. Iyer Vectorlike quarks and heavy colored bosons at the LHC PRD 97 (2018) 055002 1710.01515
169 N. Vignaroli New \mathrm{W^{'}} signals at the LHC PRD 89 (2014) 095027 1404.5558
170 CMS Collaboration Search for a vector-like quark T decaying to {\mathrm{b}\mathrm{W}} , {\mathrm{t}\mathrm{Z}} , {\mathrm{t}\mathrm{H}} in the single lepton final state at the HL-LHC CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2022
CMS-PAS-FTR-22-002
CMS-PAS-FTR-22-002
171 DELPHES 3 Collaboration delphes 3: a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment JHEP 02 (2014) 057 1307.6346
172 X. Cid Vidal et al. Report from working group 3: Beyond the standard model physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC CERN Report CERN-LPCC-2018-05, 2019
link
1812.07831
173 P. W. Graham, A. Ismail, S. Rajendran, and P. Saraswat A little solution to the little hierarchy problem: A vectorlike generation PRD 81 (2010) 055016 0910.3020
174 M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto, and N. Yokozaki Higgs mass and muon anomalous magnetic moment in supersymmetric models with vectorlike matters PRD 84 (2011) 075017 1108.3071
175 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra Heavy lepton pair production at LHC: Model discrimination with multi-lepton signals NPB 828 (2010) 289 0905.2221
176 K. Kong, S. C. Park, and T. G. Rizzo A vector-like fourth generation with a discrete symmetry from Split-UED JHEP 07 (2010) 059 1004.4635
177 R. Nevzorov E_{6} inspired supersymmetric models with exact custodial symmetry PRD 87 (2013) 015029 1205.5967
178 I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, and I. Mustać Light vector-like fermions in a minimal {SU(5)} setup PRD 89 (2014) 115004 1401.6870
179 A. Joglekar and J. L. Rosner Searching for signatures of E_{6} PRD 96 (2017) 015026 1607.06900
180 P. Schwaller, T. M. P. Tait, and R. Vega-Morales Dark matter and vectorlike leptons from gauged lepton number PRD 88 (2013) 035001 1305.1108
181 J. Halverson, N. Orlofsky, and A. Pierce Vectorlike leptons as the tip of the dark matter iceberg PRD 90 (2014) 015002 1403.1592
182 S. Bahrami et al. Dark matter and collider studies in the left-right symmetric model with vectorlike leptons PRD 95 (2017) 095024 1612.06334
183 S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, N. Sahoo, and N. Sahu Mini review on vector-like leptonic dark matter, neutrino mass, and collider signatures Front. Phys. 7 (2019) 80 1812.06505
184 K. Agashe, T. Okui, and R. Sundrum Common origin for neutrino anarchy and charged hierarchies PRL 102 (2009) 101801 0810.1277
185 M. Redi Leptons in composite MFV JHEP 09 (2013) 060 1306.1525
186 R. Dermíšek and A. Raval Explanation of the muon g{-} 2 anomaly with vectorlike leptons and its implications for Higgs decays PRD 88 (2013) 013017 1305.3522
187 E. Megí as, M. Quirós, and L. Salas {g_{\mu}-2} from vector-like leptons in warped space JHEP 05 (2017) 016 1701.05072
188 J. Kawamura, S. Raby, and A. Trautner Complete vectorlike fourth family and new {U(1)^\prime} for muon anomalies PRD 100 (2019) 055030 1906.11297
189 G. Hiller, C. Hormigos-Feliu, D. F. Litim, and T. Steudtner Model building from asymptotic safety with Higgs and flavor portals PRD 102 (2020) 095023 2008.08606
190 Muon g {-} 2 Collaboration Final report of the E821 muon anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL PRD 73 (2006) 072003 hep-ex/0602035
191 Muon g {-} 2 Collaboration Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46\unitppm PRL 126 (2021) 141801 2104.03281
192 L3 Collaboration Search for heavy neutral and charged leptons in \mathrm{e}^+ \mathrm{e}^- annihilation at LEP PLB 517 (2001) 75 hep-ex/0107015
193 R. Dermíšek, A. Raval, and S. Shin Effects of vectorlike leptons on {\mathrm{h}\to4\ell} and the connection to the muon g{-} 2 anomaly PRD 90 (2014) 034023 1406.7018
194 R. Dermíšek, J. P. Hall, E. Lunghi, and S. Shin Limits on vectorlike leptons from searches for anomalous production of multi-lepton events JHEP 12 (2014) 013 1408.3123
195 CDF Collaboration Measurement of the ratio \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{W}\to\tau\nu)/\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{e}\nu) in {\mathrm{p}\overline{\mathrm{p}}} collisions at \sqrt{s}= 1.8 TeV PRL 68 (1992) 3398
196 \DZERO Collaboration A measurement of the {\mathrm{W}\to\tau\nu} production cross section in {\mathrm{p}\overline{\mathrm{p}}} collisions at \sqrt{s}= 1.8 TeV PRL 84 (2000) 5710 hep-ex/9912065
197 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of forward {\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{e}\nu} production in {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2016) 030 1608.01484
198 ATLAS Collaboration Test of the universality of \tau and \mu lepton couplings in W-boson decays with the ATLAS detector Nature Phys. 17 (2021) 813 2007.14040
199 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton flavor universality by the measurement of the {{\mathrm{B}^0}\to \mathrm{D}_{s}^{*-}\tau^{+}\nu_{\!\tau}} branching fraction using three-prong \tau decays PRD 97 (2018) 072013 1711.02505
200 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the \tau lepton polarization and {R(\mathrm{D}^{*})} in the decay {\overline{\mathrm{B}}\to\mathrm{D}^{*}\tau^{-}\overline{\nu}_{\!\tau}} with one-prong hadronic \tau decays at Belle PRD 97 (2018) 012004 1709.00129
201 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of the {\mathrm{B}^0}\to\mathrm{D}^{*-}\tau^{+}\nu_{\!\tau} and {\mathrm{B}^0}\to\mathrm{D}^{*-}\mu^{+}\nu_{\!\mu} branching fractions using three-prong \tau -lepton decays PRL 120 (2018) 171802 1708.08856
202 Belle Collaboration Measurement of \mathcal{R}(\mathrm{D}) and \mathcal{R}(\mathrm{D}^{*}) with a semileptonic tagging method PRL 124 (2020) 161803 1910.05864
203 CMS Collaboration Search for vector-like leptons in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PRD 100 (2019) 052003 CMS-EXO-18-005
1905.10853
204 CMS Collaboration Inclusive nonresonant multilepton probes of new phenomena at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PRD 105 (2022) 112007 CMS-EXO-21-002
2202.08676
205 CMS Collaboration Search for pair-produced vector-like leptons in final states with third-generation leptons and at least three b quark jets in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PLB 846 (2023) 137713 2208.09700
206 CMS Collaboration Performance of b tagging algorithms in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with Phase 1 CMS detector CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2018-033, 2018
CDS
207 V. Mikuni and F. Canelli ABCNet: an attention-based method for particle tagging Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 (2020) 463 2001.05311
208 M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida Baryogenesis without grand unification PLB 174 (1986) 45
209 S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir Leptogenesis Phys. Rept. 466 (2008) 105 0802.2962
210 P. Minkowski {\mu\to\mathrm{e}\gamma} at a rate of one out of 10^9 muon decays? PLB 67 (1977) 421
211 M. Magg and C. Wetterich Neutrino mass problem and gauge hierarchy PLB 94 (1980) 61
212 R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation PRD 23 (1981) 165
213 J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle Neutrino decay and spontaneous violation of lepton number PRD 25 (1982) 774
214 T. Asaka, S. Blanchet, and M. Shaposhnikov The \PGnMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses PLB 631 (2005) 151 hep-ph/0503065
215 A. Datta, M. Guchait, and A. Pilaftsis Probing lepton number violation via Majorana neutrinos at hadron supercolliders PRD 50 (1994) 3195 hep-ph/9311257
216 T. Han and B. Zhang Signatures for Majorana neutrinos at hadron colliders PRL 97 (2006) 171804 hep-ph/0604064
217 F. del Aguila, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, and R. Pittau Heavy neutrino signals at large hadron colliders JHEP 10 (2007) 047 hep-ph/0703261
218 P. Bhupal Dev, A. Pilaftsis, and U.-k. Yang New production mechanism for heavy neutrinos at the LHC PRL 112 (2014) 081801 1308.2209
219 D. Alva, T. Han, and R. Ruiz Heavy Majorana neutrinos from {\mathrm{W}\gamma} fusion at hadron colliders JHEP 02 (2015) 072 1411.7305
220 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived heavy neutrinos in the decays of {\mathrm{B}} mesons produced in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2024) 183 CMS-EXO-22-019
2403.04584
221 B. Fuks et al. Majorana neutrinos in same-sign {\mathrm{W}^{\pm}\mathrm{W}^{\pm}} scattering at the LHC: Breaking the TeVns barrier PRD 103 (2021) 055005 2011.02547
222 B. Fuks et al. Probing the Weinberg operator at colliders PRD 103 (2021) 115014 2012.09882
223 S. Weinberg Baryon- and lepton-nonconserving processes PRL 43 (1979) 1566
224 C. Biggio et al. Global bounds on the Type-III seesaw JHEP 05 (2020) 022 1911.11790
225 A. Das and S. Mandal Bounds on the triplet fermions in type-III seesaw and implications for collider searches NPB 966 (2021) 115374 2006.04123
226 A. Abada et al. Low energy effects of neutrino masses JHEP 12 (2007) 061 0707.4058
227 A. Abada et al. {\mu\to\mathrm{e}\gamma} and {\tau\to\ell\gamma} decays in the fermion triplet seesaw model PRD 78 (2008) 033007 0803.0481
228 R. Franceschini, T. Hambye, and A. Strumia Type-III seesaw mechanism at CERN LHC PRD 78 (2008) 033002 0805.1613
229 Y. Cai, T. Han, T. Li, and R. Ruiz Lepton number violation: Seesaw models and their collider tests Front. Phys. 6 (2018) 40 1711.02180
230 S. Ashanujjaman and K. Ghosh Type-III see-saw: Phenomenological implications of the information lost in decoupling from high-energy to low-energy PLB 819 (2021) 136403 2102.09536
231 S. Ashanujjaman and K. Ghosh Type-III see-saw: Search for triplet fermions in final states with multiple leptons and fat-jets at 13 TeV LHC PLB 825 (2022) 136889 2111.07949
232 J. C. Pati and A. Salam Lepton number as the fourth `color' PRD 10 (1974) 275
233 R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati `Natural' left-right symmetry PRD 11 (1975) 2558
234 W.-Y. Keung and G. Senjanovic Majorana neutrinos and the production of the right-handed charged gauge boson PRL 50 (1983) 1427
235 A. Maiezza, M. Nemevšek, F. Nesti, and G. Senjanović Left-right symmetry at LHC PRD 82 (2010) 055022 1005.5160
236 O. Mattelaer, M. Mitra, and R. Ruiz Automated neutrino jet and top jet predictions at next-to-leading-order with parton shower matching in effective left-right symmetric models 1610.08985
237 J. C. Pati, A. Salam, and J. A. Strathdee Are quarks composite? PLB 59 (1975) 265
238 O. W. Greenberg and C. A. Nelson Composite models of leptons PRD 10 (1974) 2567
239 E. Eichten and K. Lane Dynamical breaking of weak interaction symmetries PLB 90 (1980) 125
240 E. Eichten, K. D. Lane, and M. E. Peskin New tests for quark and lepton substructure PRL 50 (1983) 811
241 H. Harari Composite models for quarks and leptons Phys. Rept. 104 (1984) 159
242 H. Terazawa, K. Akama, and Y. Chikashige Unified model of the Nambu--Jona--Lasinio type for all elementary-particle forces PRD 15 (1977) 480
243 N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani, and Y. Srivastava Anomalous Z decays: excited leptons? PLB 139 (1984) 459
244 U. Baur, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Excited quark and lepton production at hadron colliders PRD 42 (1990) 815
245 U. Baur, I. Hinchliffe, and D. Zeppenfeld Excited quark production at hadron colliders in Proc. Workshop From Colliders to Super Colliders: Madison WI, 1987
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2 (1987) 1285
246 O. Panella and Y. N. Srivastava Bounds on compositeness from neutrinoless double \beta decay PRD 52 (1995) 5308 hep-ph/9411224
247 O. Panella, C. Carimalo, Y. N. Srivastava, and A. Widom Neutrinoless double \beta decay with composite neutrinos PRD 56 (1997) 5766 hep-ph/9701251
248 O. Panella, C. Carimalo, and Y. N. Srivastava Production of like sign dileptons in {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions through composite Majorana neutrinos PRD 62 (2000) 015013 hep-ph/9903253
249 S. Biondini et al. Complementarity between neutrinoless double beta decay and collider searches for heavy neutrinos in composite-fermion models 2111.01053
250 R. Leonardi et al. Hunting for heavy composite Majorana neutrinos at the LHC EPJC 76 (2016) 593 1510.07988
251 F. del Aguila and J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra Electroweak scale seesaw and heavy Dirac neutrino signals at LHC PLB 672 (2009) 158 0809.2096
252 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos in same-sign dilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 01 (2019) 122 CMS-EXO-17-028
1806.10905
253 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos in {\mu^\pm\mu^\pm}+ jets events in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV PLB 748 (2015) 144 CMS-EXO-12-057
1501.05566
254 J. de Blas Electroweak limits on physics beyond the standard model in Proc. 1st Large Hadron Collider Physics Conference (LHCP ): Barcelona, 2013
EPJ Web Conf. 60 (2013) 19008
1307.6173
255 DELPHI Collaboration Search for neutral heavy leptons produced in Z decays Z. Phys. C 74 (1997) 57
256 L3 Collaboration Search for isosinglet neutral heavy leptons in \mathrm{Z^0} decays PLB 295 (1992) 371
257 L3 Collaboration Search for heavy isosinglet neutrino in \mathrm{e}^+ \mathrm{e}^- annihilation at LEP PLB 517 (2001) 67 hep-ex/0107014
258 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos with the ATLAS detector in {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions at \sqrt{s}= 8 TeV JHEP 07 (2015) 162 1506.06020
259 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutral leptons in events with three charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PRL 120 (2018) 221801 CMS-EXO-17-012
1802.02965
260 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutral leptons in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV Submitted to JHEP, 2024 CMS-EXO-22-011
2403.00100
261 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with displaced vertices in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2022) 081 CMS-EXO-20-009
2201.05578
262 CMS Collaboration Probing heavy Majorana neutrinos and the Weinberg operator through vector boson fusion processes in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PRL 131 (2023) 011803 CMS-EXO-21-003
2206.08956
263 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with lepton flavour conserving or violating decays to a jet and a charged lepton JHEP 03 (2024) 105 CMS-EXO-21-013
2312.07484
264 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy neutral leptons in decays of W bosons produced in 13 TeV {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions using prompt and displaced signatures with the ATLAS detector JHEP 10 (2019) 265 1905.09787
265 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy neutral leptons in decays of W bosons using a dilepton displaced vertex in \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} collisions with the ATLAS detector PRL 131 (2023) 061803 2204.11988
266 NA62 Collaboration Searches for lepton number violating \mathrm{K^+} decays PLB 797 (2019) 134794 1905.07770
267 CMS Collaboration A deep neural network to search for new long-lived particles decaying to jets Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 (2020) 035012 CMS-EXO-19-011
1912.12238
268 R. Frühwirth Application of Kalman filtering to track and vertex fitting NIM A 262 (1987) 444
269 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying in the CMS endcap muon detectors in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PRL 127 (2021) 261804 CMS-EXO-20-015
2107.04838
270 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons decaying in the CMS muon detectors in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV Accepted by Phys. Rev. D, 2024 CMS-EXO-22-017
2402.18658
271 CMS Collaboration Recording and reconstructing 10 billion unbiased b hadron decays in CMS CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2019-043, 2019
CDS
272 CMS Collaboration Enriching the physics program of the CMS experiment via data scouting and data parking Submitted to Phys. Rept, 2024 CMS-EXO-23-007
2403.16134
273 CMS Collaboration Test of lepton flavor universality in {{\mathrm{B}^{\pm}}\to\mathrm{K^{\pm}}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}} and {{\mathrm{B}^{\pm}}\to\mathrm{K^{\pm}}\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-} decays in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV Accepted by Rept. Prog. Phys, 2024 CMS-BPH-22-005
2401.07090
274 K. Prokofiev and T. Speer A kinematic and a decay chain reconstruction library in Proc. 14th International Conference on Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP ): Interlaken, Switzerland, 2004
link
275 P. Baldi et al. Parameterized neural networks for high-energy physics EPJC 76 (2016) 235 1601.07913
276 LHCb Collaboration Search for Majorana neutrinos in {{\mathrm{B}^{-}}\to\pi^{+}\mu^{-}\mu^{-}} decays PRL 112 (2014) 131802 1401.5361
277 Belle Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos at Belle PRD 87 (2013) 071102 1301.1105
278 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy lepton partners of neutrinos in proton-proton collisions in the context of the type III seesaw mechanism PLB 718 (2012) 348 CMS-EXO-11-073
1210.1797
279 CMS Collaboration Search for evidence of the type-III seesaw mechanism in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PRL 119 (2017) 221802 CMS-EXO-17-006
1708.07962
280 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2020) 051 CMS-EXO-19-002
1911.04968
281 CMS Collaboration Search for a right-handed W boson and a heavy neutrino in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 04 (2022) 047 CMS-EXO-20-002
2112.03949
282 C. Brust et al. Identifying boosted new physics with non-isolated leptons JHEP 04 (2015) 079 1410.0362
283 E. Gross and O. Vitells Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics EPJC 70 (2010) 525 1005.1891
284 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy right-handed W boson and a heavy neutrino in events with two same-flavor leptons and two jets at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 05 (2018) 148 CMS-EXO-17-011
1803.11116
285 CMS Collaboration Search for third-generation scalar leptoquarks and heavy right-handed neutrinos in final states with two tau leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2017) 121 CMS-EXO-16-023
1703.03995
286 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy neutrinos and third-generation leptoquarks in hadronic states of two \tau leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2019) 170 CMS-EXO-17-016
1811.00806
287 K. Huitu, J. Maalampi, A. Pietil ä , and M. Raidal Doubly charged Higgs at LHC NPB 487 (1997) 27 hep-ph/9606311
288 G. Barenboim, K. Huitu, J. Maalampi, and M. Raidal Constraints on doubly charged Higgs interactions at linear collider PLB 394 (1997) 132 hep-ph/9611362
289 CMS Collaboration Search for \mathrm{Z}^{'} bosons decaying to pairs of heavy Majorana neutrinos in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2023) 181 CMS-EXO-20-006
2307.06959
290 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy composite Majorana neutrino in events with dilepton signatures from proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PLB 843 (2023) 137803 CMS-EXO-20-011
2210.03082
291 CMS Collaboration Search for a heavy composite Majorana neutrino in the final state with two leptons and two quarks at \sqrt{s}= 13 TeV PLB 775 (2017) 315 CMS-EXO-16-026
1706.08578
292 S. Biondini, R. Leonardi, O. Panella, and M. Presilla Perturbative unitarity bounds for effective composite models PLB 795 (2019) 644 1903.12285
293 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying to final states with a pair of muons in proton-proton collisions at \sqrt{s}= 13.6 TeV JHEP 05 (2024) 047 CMS-EXO-23-014
2402.14491
294 A. Das, Y. Gao, and T. Kamon Heavy neutrino search via semileptonic Higgs decay at the LHC EPJC 79 (2019) 424 1704.00881
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN