CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-19-011 ; CERN-EP-2019-281
A deep neural network to search for new long-lived particles decaying to jets
Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 1 (2020) 035012
Abstract: A tagging algorithm to identify jets that are significantly displaced from the proton-proton (pp) collision region in the CMS detector at the LHC is presented. Displaced jets can arise from the decays of long-lived particles (LLPs), which are predicted by several theoretical extensions of the standard model. The tagger is a multiclass classifier based on a deep neural network, which is parameterised according to the proper decay length $c\tau_0$ of the LLP. A novel scheme is defined to reliably label jets from LLP decays for supervised learning. Samples of pp collision data, recorded by the CMS detector at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, and simulated events are used to train the neural network. Domain adaptation by backward propagation is performed to improve the simulation modelling of the jet class probability distributions observed in pp collision data. The potential performance of the tagger is demonstrated with a search for long-lived gluinos, a manifestation of split supersymmetric models. The tagger provides a rejection factor of 10 000 for jets from standard model processes, while maintaining an LLP jet tagging efficiency of 30-80% for gluinos with 1 mm $\leq c\tau_0 \leq$ 10 m. The expected coverage of the parameter space for split supersymmetry is presented.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Two example ${\mathrm{\widetilde{g}}} \to \mathrm{q} \mathrm{\bar{q}} \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ decay chains, constructed from information provided by the MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO [55] and PYTHIA [56] programs. The positions of various particles in the $\eta $-$\phi $ plane are shown: the LLP (${{\mathrm{\widetilde{g}}}}$) and its daughter particles ($\mathrm{q} \mathrm{\bar{q}} \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $) are shown in the lower and middle planes, respectively; the upper plane depicts the location of the stable particles after hadronisation, with shaded ellipses overlaid to indicate the reconstructed jets. Each quark and its decay is assigned a unique colour. The dotted lines indicate the links between parent and daughter particles.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
An example ${\mathrm{\widetilde{g}}} \to \mathrm{q} \mathrm{\bar{q}} \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ decay chain, constructed from information provided by the MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO [55] and PYTHIA [56] programs. The positions of various particles in the $\eta $-$\phi $ plane are shown: the LLP (${{\mathrm{\widetilde{g}}}}$) and its daughter particles ($\mathrm{q} \mathrm{\bar{q}} \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $) are shown in the lower and middle planes, respectively; the upper plane depicts the location of the stable particles after hadronisation, with shaded ellipses overlaid to indicate the reconstructed jets. Each quark and its decay is assigned a unique colour. The dotted lines indicate the links between parent and daughter particles.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
An example ${\mathrm{\widetilde{g}}} \to \mathrm{q} \mathrm{\bar{q}} \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $ decay chain, constructed from information provided by the MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO [55] and PYTHIA [56] programs. The positions of various particles in the $\eta $-$\phi $ plane are shown: the LLP (${{\mathrm{\widetilde{g}}}}$) and its daughter particles ($\mathrm{q} \mathrm{\bar{q}} \tilde{\chi}^0_1 $) are shown in the lower and middle planes, respectively; the upper plane depicts the location of the stable particles after hadronisation, with shaded ellipses overlaid to indicate the reconstructed jets. Each quark and its decay is assigned a unique colour. The dotted lines indicate the links between parent and daughter particles.

png pdf
Figure 2:
An overview of the DNN architecture, which comprises convolutional and dense layers; the numbers of filters and nodes are indicated. Dropout layers and activation functions are not shown. The input features are grouped by object type and ($m \times n$) indicates the maximum number of objects ($m$) and the number of features per object ($n$). The gradients of the class $(L_\text {class})$ and domain $(L_\text {domain})$ losses with respect to the weights $\vec{w}$, used during backward propagation, are shown.

png pdf
Figure 3:
A schematic of the input pipeline for training the DNN, which uses the TensorFlow (TF) queue system with custom operation kernels for reading root trees from disk, (${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, $\eta $) resampling for SM jets, and generating random ${c\tau _{0}}$ values for jets from SM backgrounds and data.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Distributions of the maximum probability for the LLP jet class obtained from all selected jets in a given event, ${P_\text {max}(\mathrm {LLP}| {c\tau _{0}})}$. The distributions from pp collision data (circular marker) and simulated events (histograms) are compared in the $\mu$+jets (upper row) and $\mu\mu$+jets (lower row) CRs, using a DNN trained without (left column) and with (right column) DA. All probabilities are evaluated with $ {c\tau _{0}} = $ 1 mm. The Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) is introduced in the text. The lower subpanels show the ratios of the binned yields obtained from data and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. The statistical (hatched bands) and systematic (solid bands) uncertainties due to the finite-size simulation samples and the simulation mismodelling of the mistag rate, respectively, are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Distribution of the maximum probability for the LLP jet class obtained from all selected jets in a given event, ${P_\text {max}(\mathrm {LLP}| {c\tau _{0}})}$. The distribution from pp collision data (circular marker) and simulated events (histograms) are compared in the $\mu$+jets CR, using a DNN trained without DA. All probabilities are evaluated with $ {c\tau _{0}} = $ 1 mm. The Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) is introduced in the text. The lower subpanel shows the ratios of the binned yields obtained from data and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. The statistical (hatched bands) and systematic (solid bands) uncertainties due to the finite-size simulation samples and the simulation mismodelling of the mistag rate, respectively, are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Distribution of the maximum probability for the LLP jet class obtained from all selected jets in a given event, ${P_\text {max}(\mathrm {LLP}| {c\tau _{0}})}$. The distribution from pp collision data (circular marker) and simulated events (histograms) are compared in the $\mu$+jets CR, using a DNN trained with DA. All probabilities are evaluated with $ {c\tau _{0}} = $ 1 mm. The Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) is introduced in the text. The lower subpanel shows the ratios of the binned yields obtained from data and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. The statistical (hatched bands) and systematic (solid bands) uncertainties due to the finite-size simulation samples and the simulation mismodelling of the mistag rate, respectively, are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Distribution of the maximum probability for the LLP jet class obtained from all selected jets in a given event, ${P_\text {max}(\mathrm {LLP}| {c\tau _{0}})}$. The distribution from pp collision data (circular marker) and simulated events (histograms) are compared in the $\mu\mu$+jets CR, using a DNN trained without DA. All probabilities are evaluated with $ {c\tau _{0}} = $ 1 mm. The Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) is introduced in the text. The lower subpanel shows the ratios of the binned yields obtained from data and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. The statistical (hatched bands) and systematic (solid bands) uncertainties due to the finite-size simulation samples and the simulation mismodelling of the mistag rate, respectively, are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
Distribution of the maximum probability for the LLP jet class obtained from all selected jets in a given event, ${P_\text {max}(\mathrm {LLP}| {c\tau _{0}})}$. The distribution from pp collision data (circular marker) and simulated events (histograms) are compared in the $\mu\mu$+jets CR, using a DNN trained with DA. All probabilities are evaluated with $ {c\tau _{0}} = $ 1 mm. The Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) is introduced in the text. The lower subpanel shows the ratios of the binned yields obtained from data and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. The statistical (hatched bands) and systematic (solid bands) uncertainties due to the finite-size simulation samples and the simulation mismodelling of the mistag rate, respectively, are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The ROC curves illustrating the tagger performance for the split (solid line), GMSB (dashed line), and RPV (dot-dashed line) SUSY benchmark models, assuming ${c\tau _{0}}$ values of 1 mm (left) and 1 m (right). The thin line with hatched shading indicates the performance obtained with a DNN training using split SUSY samples but without the DA. The jet sample is defined in the text.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The ROC curves illustrating the tagger performance for the split (solid line), GMSB (dashed line), and RPV (dot-dashed line) SUSY benchmark models, assuming ${c\tau _{0}}$ values of 1 mm. The thin line with hatched shading indicates the performance obtained with a DNN training using split SUSY samples but without the DA. The jet sample is defined in the text.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The ROC curves illustrating the tagger performance for the split (solid line), GMSB (dashed line), and RPV (dot-dashed line) SUSY benchmark models, assuming ${c\tau _{0}}$ values of 1 m. The thin line with hatched shading indicates the performance obtained with a DNN training using split SUSY samples but without the DA. The jet sample is defined in the text.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The LLP jet tagging efficiency as a function of the jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, $\eta $, and $N_{\mathrm {SV}}$ using a working point that yields a mistag rate of 0.01% for the udsg jet class, as obtained from an inclusive sample of simulated ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ events. The efficiency curves are shown separately for the split (circular marker), GMSB (triangle marker), and RPV (square marker) SUSY benchmark models, assuming ${c\tau _{0}}$ values of 1 m (upper row) and 1 mm (lower row).

png pdf
Figure 7:
The LLP jet tagging efficiency, using a working point that yields a mistag rate of 0.01% for the udsg jet class obtained from an inclusive sample of simulated ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ events, when (left) the DNN is evaluated as a function of the model parameter value ${c\tau _{0}}$ for an uncompressed and a compressed split SUSY model, and (right) the DNN is evaluated over a range of ${c\tau _{0}}$ values for uncompressed split SUSY models generated with $ {c\tau _{0}} = $ 1 mm and 1 m; the dashed vertical lines indicate equality for the evaluated and generated values of ${c\tau _{0}}$ for each model. The fixed model parameters are defined in the legends.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
The LLP jet tagging efficiency, using a working point that yields a mistag rate of 0.01% for the udsg jet class obtained from an inclusive sample of simulated ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ events, when the DNN is evaluated as a function of the model parameter value ${c\tau _{0}}$ for an uncompressed and a compressed split SUSY model. The fixed model parameters are defined in the legends.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
The LLP jet tagging efficiency, using a working point that yields a mistag rate of 0.01% for the udsg jet class obtained from an inclusive sample of simulated ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ events, when the DNN is evaluated over a range of ${c\tau _{0}}$ values for uncompressed split SUSY models generated with $ {c\tau _{0}} = $ 1 mm and 1 m; the dashed vertical lines indicate equality for the evaluated and generated values of ${c\tau _{0}}$ for each model.

png pdf
Figure 8:
The negative log-likelihood of a maximum likelihood fit to the Asimov data set as a function of the signal efficiency scale factor and $r/r_\text {UL}$ for a (left) uncompressed and (right) compressed scenario. The black solid (dashed) line indicate the 68 (95)% CL interval, while for $r = r_\text {UL}$ (white dotted line) the white solid and dashed lines indicate the SF constraints at 68% and 95% CL, respectively. The product of the LLP jet tagger efficiency and the SF is bound to $[0,1]$.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
The negative log-likelihood of a maximum likelihood fit to the Asimov data set as a function of the signal efficiency scale factor and $r/r_\text {UL}$ for an uncompressed scenario. The black solid (dashed) line indicate the 68 (95)% CL interval, while for $r = r_\text {UL}$ (white dotted line) the white solid and dashed lines indicate the SF constraints at 68% and 95% CL, respectively. The product of the LLP jet tagger efficiency and the SF is bound to $[0,1]$.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
The negative log-likelihood of a maximum likelihood fit to the Asimov data set as a function of the signal efficiency scale factor and $r/r_\text {UL}$ for a compressed scenario. The black solid (dashed) line indicate the 68 (95)% CL interval, while for $r = r_\text {UL}$ (white dotted line) the white solid and dashed lines indicate the SF constraints at 68% and 95% CL, respectively. The product of the LLP jet tagger efficiency and the SF is bound to $[0,1]$.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Expected 95% CL lower limits on ${m_{{\mathrm{\widetilde{g}}}}}$ as a function of ${c\tau _{0}}$ for split SUSY models with an uncompressed (left) and a very compressed (right) mass spectrum. The shaded bands indicate the total uncertainty from both statistical and systematic sources. The model assumptions are indicated by the legends. The results are compared to the expected limits obtained in Ref. [27], indicated by the dashed lines.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Expected 95% CL lower limits on ${m_{{\mathrm{\widetilde{g}}}}}$ as a function of ${c\tau _{0}}$ for split SUSY models with an uncompressed mass spectrum. The shaded band indicates the total uncertainty from both statistical and systematic sources. The model assumptions are indicated by the legends. The results are compared to the expected limits obtained in Ref. [27], indicated by the dashed line.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Expected 95% CL lower limits on ${m_{{\mathrm{\widetilde{g}}}}}$ as a function of ${c\tau _{0}}$ for split SUSY models with a very compressed mass spectrum. The shaded band indicates the total uncertainty from both statistical and systematic sources. The model assumptions are indicated by the legends. The results are compared to the expected limits obtained in Ref. [27], indicated by the dashed line.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The event counts and uncertainties for SM backgrounds and split SUSY models, as determined from simulation, in categories defined by ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ and (${N_\text {jet}}$, ${N_\text {tag}}$). The simulated samples are normalised to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The uncompressed and compressed split SUSY models are defined in Section 4. The value of ${c\tau _{0}}$ is assumed to be 1 mm. The uncertainties include both statistical and systematic contributions. Expected counts for events that satisfy $ {N_\text {tag}} < 2$ are not shown.
Summary
Many models of new physics beyond the standard model predict the production of long-lived particles (LLPs) in proton-proton (pp) collisions at the LHC. Jets arising from the decay of LLPs (LLP jets) can be appreciably displaced from the pp collisions. A novel tagger to identify LLP jets is presented. The tagger employs a deep neutral network (DNN) using an architecture inspired by the CMS DeepJet algorithm. Simplified models of split supersymmetry (SUSY), which yield neutralinos and LLP jets from the decay of long-lived gluinos, are used to train the DNN and demonstrate its performance.

The application of various techniques related to the tagger are reported. A custom labelling scheme for LLP jets based on generator-level information from Monte Carlo programs is defined. The proper decay length ${c\tau_{0}}$ of the gluino is used as an external parameter to the DNN, which allows hypothesis testing over several orders of magnitude in ${c\tau_{0}}$ with a single DNN. The DNN is trained using samples of both simulated events and pp collision data. The application of domain adaptation by backward propagation significantly improves the agreement of the DNN output for simulation and data, by an order of magnitude according to the Jensen-Shannon divergence, when compared to training the DNN with simulation only. The method is validated using signal-depleted control samples of pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The samples were recorded by the CMS experiment and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Training the DNN with collision data does not significantly degrade the tagger performance. The tagger rejects 99.99% of light-flavour jets from standard model processes, as measured in an inclusive $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ sample, while retaining approximately 30-80% of LLP jets for split SUSY models with 1 mm $\leq \text{c}\tau_0 \leq $ 10 m and a gluino-neutralino mass difference of at least 200 GeV.

Finally, the potential performance of the tagger is demonstrated in the framework of a search for split SUSY in final states containing jets and significant missing transverse momentum. Simulated event samples provide the expected contributions from standard model background processes. Candidate signal events were categorised according to the scalar sum of jet momenta, the number of jets, and the number of tagged LLP jets. Expected lower limits on the gluino mass at 95% confidence level are determined with a binned likelihood fit as a function of ${c\tau_{0}}$ in the range from 10 $\mu$m to 10 m. A procedure to constrain a correction to the LLP jet tagger efficiency in the likelihood fit is introduced. Competitive limits are demonstrated: models with a long-lived gluino of mass ${\gtrsim}$ 2 TeV, a neutralino mass of 100 GeV, and a proper decay length in the range 1 mm $\leq {c\tau_{0}} \leq$ 1 m are expected to be excluded by this search.
References
1 K. Albertsson et al. Machine learning in high energy physics community white paper in 18th International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACAT 2017), Proceedings, Seattle 2017 1807.02876
2 A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and B. Nachman Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: a review of recent advances in theory and machine learning Submitted to Phys. Rept 1709.04464
3 ATLAS Collaboration The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider JINST 3 (2008) S08003
4 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
5 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
6 ATLAS Collaboration ATLAS b-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ events in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Submitted to EPJC 1907.05120
7 M. Stoye Deep learning in jet reconstruction at CMS in 18th International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACAT) 2018
8 CMS Collaboration Performance of the DeepJet b tagging algorithm using 41.9/fb of data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with Phase 1 CMS detector CDS
9 N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC JHEP 06 (2005) 073 hep-th/0405159
10 G. F. Giudice and A. Romanino Split supersymmetry NPB 699 (2004) 65 hep-ph/0406088
11 J. L. Hewett, B. Lillie, M. Masip, and T. G. Rizzo Signatures of long-lived gluinos in split supersymmetry JHEP 09 (2004) 070 hep-ph/0408248
12 G. F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi Theories with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking PR 322 (1999) 419 hep-ph/9801271
13 R. Barbier et al. R-parity violating supersymmetry PR 420 (2005) 1 hep-ph/0406039
14 M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek Discovering the Higgs through highly-displaced vertices PLB 661 (2008) 263 hep-ph/0605193
15 T. Han, Z. Si, K. M. Zurek, and M. J. Strassler Phenomenology of hidden valleys at hadron colliders JHEP 07 (2008) 008 0712.2041
16 D. Alves et al. Simplified models for LHC new physics searches JPG 39 (2012) 105005 1105.2838
17 O. Buchmuller et al. Simplified models for displaced dark matter signatures JHEP 09 (2017) 076 1704.06515
18 J. Alimena et al. Searching for long-lived particles beyond the standard model at the Large Hadron Collider 1903.04497
19 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for long-lived neutral particles in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV that decay into displaced hadronic jets in the ATLAS calorimeter EPJC 79 (2019) 481 1902.03094
21 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy charged long-lived particles in the ATLAS detector in 36.1 fb$ ^{-1} $ of proton-proton collision data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 99 (2019) 092007 1902.01636
22 ATLAS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles produced in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV that decay into displaced hadronic jets in the ATLAS muon spectrometer PRD 99 (2019) 052005 1811.07370
23 ATLAS Collaboration Search for long-lived, massive particles in events with displaced vertices and missing transverse momentum in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector PRD 97 (2018) 052012 1710.04901
24 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles using nonprompt jets and missing transverse momentum with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 797 (2019) 134876 CMS-EXO-19-001
1906.06441
25 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying into displaced jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 99 (2019) 032011 CMS-EXO-18-007
1811.07991
26 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles with displaced vertices in multijet events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 98 (2018) 092011 CMS-EXO-17-018
1808.03078
27 CMS Collaboration Search for natural and split supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum JHEP 05 (2018) 025 CMS-SUS-16-038
1802.02110
28 CMS Collaboration Search for decays of stopped exotic long-lived particles produced in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 05 (2018) 127 CMS-EXO-16-004
1801.00359
29 CMS Collaboration Search for new long-lived particles at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 780 (2018) 432 CMS-EXO-16-003
1711.09120
30 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived charged particles in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 94 (2016) 112004 CMS-EXO-15-010
1609.08382
31 LHCb Collaboration Updated search for long-lived particles decaying to jet pairs EPJC 77 (2017) 812 1705.07332
32 P. Baldi et al. Parameterized neural networks for high-energy physics EPJC 76 (2016) 235 1601.07913
33 P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, S. Rajendran, and P. Saraswat Displaced supersymmetry JHEP 07 (2012) 149 1204.6038
34 Y. Ganin and V. Lempitsky Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation 1409.7495
35 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
36 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
37 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
38 CMS Collaboration Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
39 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
40 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
41 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ \text{B}\overline{\text{B}} $ angular correlations based on secondary vertex reconstruction at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 03 (2011) 136 CMS-BPH-10-010
1102.3194
42 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
43 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
44 CMS Collaboration Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data CMS-PAS-JME-16-003 CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
45 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
46 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
47 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
48 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at 7 TeV in events with jets and missing transverse energy PLB 698 (2011) 196 CMS-SUS-10-003
1101.1628
49 S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and F. Wilczek Supersymmetry and the scale of unification PRD 24 (1981) 1681
50 L. E. Ibanez and G. G. Ross Low-energy predictions in supersymmetric grand unified theories PLB 105 (1981) 439
51 W. J. Marciano and G. Senjanovi\'c Predictions of supersymmetric grand unified theories PRD 25 (1982) 3092
52 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
53 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
54 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
55 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
56 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
57 M. Fairbairn et al. Stable massive particles at colliders PR 438 (2007) 1 hep-ph/0611040
58 A. C. Kraan Interactions of heavy stable hadronizing particles EPJC 37 (2004) 91 hep-ex/0404001
59 R. Mackeprang and A. Rizzi Interactions of coloured heavy stable particles in matter EPJC 50 (2007) 353 hep-ph/0612161
60 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
61 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
62 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
63 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG box JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
64 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
65 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s- and t-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
66 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
67 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush $ \mathrm{W} $ physics at the LHC with FEWZ 2.1 CPC 184 (2013) 208 1201.5896
68 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush FEWZ 2.0: a code for hadronic $ \mathrm{Z} $ production at next-to-next-to-leading order CPC 182 (2011) 2388 1011.3540
69 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
70 C. Borschensky et al. Squark and gluino production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13, 14, 33 and 100 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 3174 1407.5066
71 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
72 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in PYTHIA 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
73 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
74 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
75 D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran Pileup per particle identification JHEP 10 (2014) 059 1407.6013
76 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data CMS-PAS-JME-18-001 CMS-PAS-JME-18-001
77 X. Glorot, A. Bordes, and Y. Bengio Deep sparse rectifier neural networks in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics
78 N. Srivastava et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting J. Mach. Learn. Res 15 (2014) 1929
79 A. Ryzhikov and A. Ustyuzhanin Domain adaptation with gradient reversal for MC/real data calibration in 18th International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACAT) 2018
80 D. P. Kingma and J. Ba Adam: a method for stochastic optimization in Proceedings, Third Int'l Conf. for Learning Representations 2014 1412.6980
81 F. Chollet et al. Keras 2015 \url https://keras.io
82 M. Abadi et al. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems 1603.04467
83 R. Brun and F. Rademakers ROOT: an object oriented data analysis framework in New computing techniques in physics research V. Proceedings, 5th International Workshop, AIHENP '96, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996
84 M. Komm et al. ROOT-based preprocessing pipeline for TENSORFLOW/KERAS
85 J. Lin Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 37 (2006) 145
86 S. Kallweit et al. NLO QCD+EW predictions for V+jets including off-shell vector-boson decays and multijet merging JHEP 04 (2016) 021 1511.08692
87 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
88 A. Kalogeropoulos and J. Alwall The SysCalc code: a tool to derive theoretical systematic uncertainties 1801.08401
89 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
90 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples CPC 77 (1993) 219
91 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
92 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
93 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
94 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the CLs technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN