CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-HIG-25-003 ; CERN-EP-2026-201
Off-shell Higgs boson measurements: Yukawa couplings, self-coupling, compositeness, and width
Submitted to Physical Review D
Abstract: Measurements of Higgs boson production in the off-shell region are presented, using the four-lepton decay channel. Data from proton-proton collisions at the CERN LHC, collected by the CMS experiment and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, are utilized. The first direct test of composite Higgs boson models is performed, with a lower limit on the compositeness scale $ \Lambda_\mathrm{H} $ set at 870 GeV at the 95% confidence level. Tests of gluon-fusion production within the standard model effective field theory framework are performed. The first constraint on the Higgs boson self-coupling in the off-shell region is obtained. By combining on- and off-shell measurements, the analysis sets the tightest constraints to date on light-quark Yukawa couplings, while relaxing assumptions such as the bound on the Higgs boson coupling to vector bosons, thereby providing more model-independent results. Constraints on the Higgs boson width are provided while accounting for a range of beyond-the-standard-model effects, including both light and heavy particles in the gluon-fusion production loop, as well as modified couplings to vector bosons. A combined analysis of the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ and $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{W}\mathrm{W} $ channels is performed to improve sensitivity to the Higgs boson width, yielding $ \Gamma_{\mathrm{H}}= $ 5.1 $ ^{+2.0}_{-1.8} $ MeV. The scenario of no off-shell Higgs boson production is excluded at a confidence level exceeding 5 standard deviations.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Leading-order Feynman diagrams for the Higgs boson production processes considered in the off-shell region: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right).

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Leading-order Feynman diagrams for the Higgs boson production processes considered in the off-shell region: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right).

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Leading-order Feynman diagrams for the Higgs boson production processes considered in the off-shell region: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right).

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Leading-order Feynman diagrams for the Higgs boson production processes considered in the off-shell region: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right).

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Leading-order Feynman diagrams for the Higgs boson production processes considered in the off-shell region: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right).

png pdf
Figure 2:
The leading-order Feynman diagram illustrating the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $ decay process.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The pre-fit $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions (left) and the combined discriminants (right) in the off-shell region are shown for the untagged (upper), $ \mathrm{VBF} $-tagged (middle), and VH-tagged (lower) categories, divided by the bin width. The legend shows the expected signal, background, or their combined yield with interference for the various processes. The ratio of observation to expectation is displayed in the subpanel below the main plot with a ${\pm}$1 standard deviation uncertainty band in yellow. The dashed curve labeled ``Without H'' denotes the no-off-shell-H-production hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The pre-fit $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions (left) and the combined discriminants (right) in the off-shell region are shown for the untagged (upper), $ \mathrm{VBF} $-tagged (middle), and VH-tagged (lower) categories, divided by the bin width. The legend shows the expected signal, background, or their combined yield with interference for the various processes. The ratio of observation to expectation is displayed in the subpanel below the main plot with a ${\pm}$1 standard deviation uncertainty band in yellow. The dashed curve labeled ``Without H'' denotes the no-off-shell-H-production hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The pre-fit $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions (left) and the combined discriminants (right) in the off-shell region are shown for the untagged (upper), $ \mathrm{VBF} $-tagged (middle), and VH-tagged (lower) categories, divided by the bin width. The legend shows the expected signal, background, or their combined yield with interference for the various processes. The ratio of observation to expectation is displayed in the subpanel below the main plot with a ${\pm}$1 standard deviation uncertainty band in yellow. The dashed curve labeled ``Without H'' denotes the no-off-shell-H-production hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The pre-fit $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions (left) and the combined discriminants (right) in the off-shell region are shown for the untagged (upper), $ \mathrm{VBF} $-tagged (middle), and VH-tagged (lower) categories, divided by the bin width. The legend shows the expected signal, background, or their combined yield with interference for the various processes. The ratio of observation to expectation is displayed in the subpanel below the main plot with a ${\pm}$1 standard deviation uncertainty band in yellow. The dashed curve labeled ``Without H'' denotes the no-off-shell-H-production hypothesis.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Evolution of EW production of the Higgs boson as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for selected values of the compositeness scale $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{H}} $: H-only production (left) and the combined four-lepton distribution including Higgs boson signal, background, and interference (right). The background-only scenario (``Without H'') is indicated by the dashed line on the right.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Evolution of EW production of the Higgs boson as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for selected values of the compositeness scale $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{H}} $: H-only production (left) and the combined four-lepton distribution including Higgs boson signal, background, and interference (right). The background-only scenario (``Without H'') is indicated by the dashed line on the right.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Evolution of EW production of the Higgs boson as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for selected values of the compositeness scale $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{H}} $: H-only production (left) and the combined four-lepton distribution including Higgs boson signal, background, and interference (right). The background-only scenario (``Without H'') is indicated by the dashed line on the right.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) profile-likelihood scans for $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{H}} $ from fits using off-shell production only (blue squares) and combined on- and off-shell production (red circles). Markers indicate the discrete $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{H}} $ points profiled. The black horizontal dashed lines mark the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) scans for the couplings $ \kappa_{\mathrm{t}} $ (upper left), $ \kappa_{Q} $ (upper right), $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{\mathrm{t}} $ (lower left), and $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{Q} $ (lower right), obtained from the combined on- and off-shell fit. All four couplings, together with $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}} $ and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $, are allowed to vary simultaneously. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) scans for the couplings $ \kappa_{\mathrm{t}} $ (upper left), $ \kappa_{Q} $ (upper right), $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{\mathrm{t}} $ (lower left), and $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{Q} $ (lower right), obtained from the combined on- and off-shell fit. All four couplings, together with $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}} $ and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $, are allowed to vary simultaneously. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) scans for the couplings $ \kappa_{\mathrm{t}} $ (upper left), $ \kappa_{Q} $ (upper right), $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{\mathrm{t}} $ (lower left), and $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{Q} $ (lower right), obtained from the combined on- and off-shell fit. All four couplings, together with $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}} $ and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $, are allowed to vary simultaneously. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) scans for the couplings $ \kappa_{\mathrm{t}} $ (upper left), $ \kappa_{Q} $ (upper right), $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{\mathrm{t}} $ (lower left), and $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{Q} $ (lower right), obtained from the combined on- and off-shell fit. All four couplings, together with $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}} $ and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $, are allowed to vary simultaneously. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) scans for the couplings $ \kappa_{\mathrm{t}} $ (upper left), $ \kappa_{Q} $ (upper right), $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{\mathrm{t}} $ (lower left), and $ \widetilde{\kappa}_{Q} $ (lower right), obtained from the combined on- and off-shell fit. All four couplings, together with $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}} $ and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $, are allowed to vary simultaneously. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Leading-order Feynman diagram illustrating the direct quark-antiquark annihilation channel for Higgs boson production.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) profile scans of the Higgs boson coupling modifiers to the light quarks: $ \kappa_{\mathrm{u}} $ (up, upper left), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{d}} $ (down, upper right), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{s}} $ (strange, lower left), and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{c}} $ (charm, lower right), shown for four analysis configurations: on-shell only or combined on- and off-shell production, and with or without the assumptions $ |\kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}|\leq $ 1 and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}=\kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $. In each scan the other light-quark couplings are profiled simultaneously. The black horizontal dashed lines mark the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) profile scans of the Higgs boson coupling modifiers to the light quarks: $ \kappa_{\mathrm{u}} $ (up, upper left), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{d}} $ (down, upper right), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{s}} $ (strange, lower left), and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{c}} $ (charm, lower right), shown for four analysis configurations: on-shell only or combined on- and off-shell production, and with or without the assumptions $ |\kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}|\leq $ 1 and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}=\kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $. In each scan the other light-quark couplings are profiled simultaneously. The black horizontal dashed lines mark the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) profile scans of the Higgs boson coupling modifiers to the light quarks: $ \kappa_{\mathrm{u}} $ (up, upper left), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{d}} $ (down, upper right), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{s}} $ (strange, lower left), and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{c}} $ (charm, lower right), shown for four analysis configurations: on-shell only or combined on- and off-shell production, and with or without the assumptions $ |\kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}|\leq $ 1 and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}=\kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $. In each scan the other light-quark couplings are profiled simultaneously. The black horizontal dashed lines mark the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) profile scans of the Higgs boson coupling modifiers to the light quarks: $ \kappa_{\mathrm{u}} $ (up, upper left), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{d}} $ (down, upper right), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{s}} $ (strange, lower left), and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{c}} $ (charm, lower right), shown for four analysis configurations: on-shell only or combined on- and off-shell production, and with or without the assumptions $ |\kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}|\leq $ 1 and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}=\kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $. In each scan the other light-quark couplings are profiled simultaneously. The black horizontal dashed lines mark the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 8-d:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) profile scans of the Higgs boson coupling modifiers to the light quarks: $ \kappa_{\mathrm{u}} $ (up, upper left), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{d}} $ (down, upper right), $ \kappa_{\mathrm{s}} $ (strange, lower left), and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{c}} $ (charm, lower right), shown for four analysis configurations: on-shell only or combined on- and off-shell production, and with or without the assumptions $ |\kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}|\leq $ 1 and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}}=\kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $. In each scan the other light-quark couplings are profiled simultaneously. The black horizontal dashed lines mark the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Feynman diagrams illustrating the loop-induced correction from the Higgs boson self-interaction in the propagator (upper) and in the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ decay (lower). Here, the black square represents the triple Higgs boson vertex.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Feynman diagrams illustrating the loop-induced correction from the Higgs boson self-interaction in the propagator (upper) and in the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ decay (lower). Here, the black square represents the triple Higgs boson vertex.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Feynman diagrams illustrating the loop-induced correction from the Higgs boson self-interaction in the propagator (upper) and in the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ decay (lower). Here, the black square represents the triple Higgs boson vertex.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Feynman diagrams illustrating the correction from the Higgs boson self-interaction in the production processes considered in Fig. 1: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right). Here, the black square represents the triple Higgs boson vertex.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Feynman diagrams illustrating the correction from the Higgs boson self-interaction in the production processes considered in Fig. 1: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right). Here, the black square represents the triple Higgs boson vertex.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Feynman diagrams illustrating the correction from the Higgs boson self-interaction in the production processes considered in Fig. 1: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right). Here, the black square represents the triple Higgs boson vertex.

png pdf
Figure 10-c:
Feynman diagrams illustrating the correction from the Higgs boson self-interaction in the production processes considered in Fig. 1: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right). Here, the black square represents the triple Higgs boson vertex.

png pdf
Figure 10-d:
Feynman diagrams illustrating the correction from the Higgs boson self-interaction in the production processes considered in Fig. 1: $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{H} $ (upper left), VH associated production (upper right), $ s $-channel VBF (lower left), and $ t $-channel VBF (lower right). Here, the black square represents the triple Higgs boson vertex.

png pdf
Figure 11:
Distributions of $ m_{4\ell} $ in simulation showing the background (black), the absolute value of the interference between the SM signal and background (gray), and the signal for various $ \kappa_{\lambda} $ values: $ \kappa_{\lambda}= $ 1 (red), 10 (blue), 20 (orange), and 30 (brown).

png pdf
Figure 12:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) profile likelihood scans from the fit for $ \kappa_{\lambda} $. The black horizontal dashed lines indicate the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 13:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) scans of $ \Gamma_{\mathrm{H}} $ for $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $ under the five progressively inclusive BSM scenarios described in the text. The black horizontal dashed lines indicate the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 14:
Left: Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) scans of $ \Gamma_\mathrm{H} $ for on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $, and in combination with off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to2\ell2\nu $, and with on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{W}\mathrm{W}\to2\ell2\nu $. Right: The off-shell signal strength, $ \mu^{\text{off}} $. The black horizontal dashed lines mark the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 14-a:
Left: Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) scans of $ \Gamma_\mathrm{H} $ for on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $, and in combination with off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to2\ell2\nu $, and with on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{W}\mathrm{W}\to2\ell2\nu $. Right: The off-shell signal strength, $ \mu^{\text{off}} $. The black horizontal dashed lines mark the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.

png pdf
Figure 14-b:
Left: Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) scans of $ \Gamma_\mathrm{H} $ for on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $, and in combination with off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to2\ell2\nu $, and with on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{W}\mathrm{W}\to2\ell2\nu $. Right: The off-shell signal strength, $ \mu^{\text{off}} $. The black horizontal dashed lines mark the 68 and 95% CL thresholds.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the observed and expected constraints on the parameters describing Higgs boson substructure, $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{H}} $ and $ d $, obtained from $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $. For each parameter the table lists the central value together with the 68 and 95% CL intervals. The hyphens at the 95% CL indicate that none of the tested hypotheses can be excluded.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the heavy-quark Yukawa coupling measurements for $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $, showing central values with 68% CL uncertainties and 95% CL intervals (in square brackets), obtained from the combined on- and off-shell fit in which all heavy-quark couplings are allowed to vary simultaneously together with $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}} $ and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of the light-quark Yukawa coupling measurements for the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $ channel, showing central values with 68% CL uncertainties and 95% CL intervals (in square brackets). Results are obtained with all other light-quark couplings profiled simultaneously together with $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}} $ and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $.

png pdf
Table 4:
Summary of the light-quark Yukawa coupling measurements using the parameters $ \overline{\kappa}_{\mathrm{q}}=\kappa_{\mathrm{q}} m_{\mathrm{q}}/m_{\mathrm{b}} $, where the values for $ \kappa_{\mathrm{q}} $ are taken from Table. 3, showing central values with 68% CL uncertainties and 95% CL intervals (in square brackets) for the $ PH\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $ channel. Results are obtained with all other light-quark couplings and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{Z}} $ and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{W}} $ profiled.

png pdf
Table 5:
Summary of the $ \kappa_\lambda $ measurements, showing the 68% CL (central values with uncertainties) and 95% CL (in square brackets) intervals for the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $.

png pdf
Table 6:
Summary of the measurements of the total $ \Gamma_\mathrm{H} $, showing the 68 and 95% CL intervals for $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $ under the five progressively more inclusive BSM scenarios discussed in text.

png pdf
Table 7:
Summary of the measurements of the total $ \Gamma_\mathrm{H} $, showing the 68 and 95% CL intervals for on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $, combination with off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to2\ell2\nu $, and with on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{W}\mathrm{W}\to2\ell2\nu $.

png pdf
Table 8:
Summary of the combined measurement for $ \mu^\text{off} $, showing the 68 and 95% CL intervals for on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $ in combination with off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to2\ell2\nu $ and on- and off-shell $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{W}\mathrm{W}\to2\ell2\nu $.
Summary
Using a data set of proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $, and improved observables, a unified study of Higgs boson production that exploits both on-shell and off-shell regions in $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ decays was performed. The off-shell region provides distinctive shape information that complements rate measurements, and combining on- and off-shell data allows for a range of physics scenarios with reduced model dependence to be probed. Four classes of effects were tested. First, Higgs boson compositeness was probed through a $ q^{2} $-dependent form factor (where $ q^{2} $ is the squared four-momentum transfer of the Higgs boson), and a lower limit of $ \Lambda_{\mathrm{H}} > $ 870 GeV was set on the compositeness scale at 95% confidence level. Second, possible heavy colored states in the gluon-fusion loop were tested by fitting $ CP $-even and $ CP $-odd modifications of the top and a generic heavy quark ($ \kappa_{\mathrm{t}},\kappa_{\PQQ},\widetilde{\kappa}_{\mathrm{t}},\widetilde{\kappa}_{\PQQ} $). These limits can be presented as direct bounds on the couplings to the Higgs boson or translated into constraints on the corresponding standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) Wilson coefficients. Third, by combining on- and off-shell measurements, $ CP $-even deviations of the light-quark Yukawa couplings ($ \kappa_{\mathrm{u}},\kappa_{\mathrm{d}},\kappa_{\mathrm{s}},\kappa_{\mathrm{c}} $) were constrained, where the off-shell information is crucial because it allows for relaxed on-shell assumptions (for example $ |\kappa_\mathrm{V}|\leq $ 1) while retaining meaningful bounds. Fourth, off-shell kinematic information was utilized to probe the Higgs boson trilinear coupling $ \kappa_{\lambda} $ via the SMEFT operator $ \mathcal{O}_{6}=(H^{\dagger}H)^{3} $. The limits are complementary to on-shell and double-H searches because they exploit different kinematic shape signatures. Finally, the total Higgs boson width $ \Gamma_\mathrm{H} $ was investigated under progressively more general BSM hypotheses: relaxing custodial symmetry, profiling the heavy- and light-sector couplings separately, and then profiling all parameters. The off-shell method was found to be robust: introducing additional BSM degrees of freedom either reveals a direct BSM signature or leaves a strong constraint on $ \Gamma_{\mathrm{H}} $ with only modest loss of precision. A new $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV combination including the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ and $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{W}\mathrm{W} $ channels was performed to maximize sensitivity to $ \Gamma_{\mathrm{H}} $, yielding $ \Gamma_{\mathrm{H}}= $ 5.1 $ ^{+2.0}_{-1.8} $ MeV and a 95% confidence-level interval of 1.7 to 9.4 MeV. The hypothesis of no off-shell Higgs boson production was excluded at the 5 standard deviation level. Taken together, these measurements showed that off-shell analyses substantially broaden the Higgs boson program: they deliver shape-based sensitivity to substructure, loop effects, light-quark Yukawa couplings, and the self-coupling, and they produce a BSM-aware and precise combined constraint on the total width of the Higgs boson.
References
1 S. L. Glashow Partial-symmetries of weak interactions NP 22 (1961) 579
2 F. Englert and R. Brout Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons PRL 13 (1964) 321
3 P. W. Higgs Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields PL 12 (1964) 132
4 P. W. Higgs Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons PRL 13 (1964) 508
5 G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble Global conservation laws and massless particles PRL 13 (1964) 585
6 S. Weinberg A model of leptons PRL 19 (1967) 1264
7 A. Salam Weak and electromagnetic interactions in Elementary particle physics: relativistic groups and analyticity, N. Svartholm, ed., Almqvist \& Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968
8 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
9 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
10 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
11 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments PRL 114 (2015) 191803 1503.07589
12 ATLAS Collaboration Combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass from the H $ \to\gamma\gamma $ and H $ \to $ Z$ Z^{*} \to 4\ell $ decay channels with the ATLAS detector using $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7, 8 and 13 TeV pp collision data PRL 131 (2023) 251802 2308.04775
13 CMS Collaboration Constraints on the Higgs boson width from off-shell production and decay to Z-boson pairs PLB 736 (2014) 64 CMS-HIG-14-002
1405.3455
14 ATLAS Collaboration Constraints on the off-shell higgs boson signal strength in the high-mass ZZ and WW final states with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 335 1503.01060
15 CMS Collaboration Limits on the Higgs boson lifetime and width from its decay to four charged leptons PRD 92 (2015) 072010 CMS-HIG-14-036
1507.06656
16 CMS Collaboration Search for Higgs boson off-shell production in proton-proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV and derivation of constraints on its total decay width JHEP 09 (2016) 051 CMS-HIG-14-032
1605.02329
17 ATLAS Collaboration Constraints on off-shell Higgs boson production and the Higgs boson total width in $ \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to4\ell $ and $ \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\to2\ell2\nu $ final states with the ATLAS detector PLB 786 (2018) 223 1808.01191
18 CMS Collaboration Measurements of the Higgs boson width and anomalous HVV couplings from on-shell and off-shell production in the four-lepton final state PRD 99 (2019) 112003 CMS-HIG-18-002
1901.00174
19 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson width and evidence of its off-shell contributions to ZZ production Nature Phys. 18 (2022) 1329 CMS-HIG-21-013
2202.06923
20 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson mass and width using the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRD 111 (2025) 092014 CMS-HIG-21-019
2409.13663
21 F. Caola and K. Melnikov Constraining the Higgs boson width with ZZ production at the LHC PRD 88 (2013) 054024 1307.4935
22 N. Kauer and G. Passarino Inadequacy of zero-width approximation for a light Higgs boson signal JHEP 08 (2012) 116 1206.4803
23 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC using full analytic results for $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g}\to \mathrm{e}^{-}\mathrm{e}^{+} \mu^{-} \mu^{+} $ JHEP 04 (2014) 060 1311.3589
24 G.-y. Huang and S. Zhou Precise values of running quark and lepton masses in the standard model PRD 103 (2021) 016010 2009.04851
25 CMS Collaboration Search for \ensuremath\gammaH production and constraints on the Yukawa couplings of light quarks to the Higgs boson PRD 112 (2025) 112001 CMS-HIG-23-011
2502.05665
26 U. Haisch and G. Koole Off-shell Higgs production at the LHC as a probe of the trilinear Higgs coupling JHEP 02 (2022) 030 2111.12589
27 CMS Collaboration Constraints on the Higgs boson self-coupling from the combination of single and double Higgs boson production in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 861 (2025) 139210 CMS-HIG-23-006
2407.13554
28 O. Witzel Review on composite Higgs models PoS LATTICE 2018 (2019) 006 1901.08216
29 T. Han, S. C. I. Leung, and M. Low Higgs to $ \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ from vector boson fusion for high-scale physics PRD 109 (2024) 115028 2305.01010
30 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis link
31 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
32 CMS Collaboration Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3 JINST 19 (2024) P05064 CMS-PRF-21-001
2309.05466
33 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
34 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
35 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2 JINST 19 (2024) P11021 CMS-TRG-19-001
2410.17038
36 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the phase-II upgrade of the CMS detector CMS Technical proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
37 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
38 CMS Collaboration ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run 2 summary plots CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2020-021, 2020
CDS
39 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
40 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
41 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
42 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
43 CMS Collaboration Measurements of production cross sections of the Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 81 (2021) 488 CMS-HIG-19-001
2103.04956
44 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
45 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
46 NNPDF Collaboration Unbiased global determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties at NNLO and at LO NPB 855 (2012) 153 1107.2652
47 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4 --- a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
48 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC -206 10, 2010
Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 20 (2010) 5
1007.3492
49 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
50 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis Higgs constraints from vector boson fusion and scattering JHEP 04 (2015) 030 1502.02990
51 Y. Gao et al. Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders PRD 81 (2010) 075022 1001.3396
52 S. Bolognesi et al. Spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC PRD 86 (2012) 095031 1208.4018
53 I. Anderson et al. Constraining anomalous $ \mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V} $ interactions at proton and lepton colliders PRD 89 (2014) 035007 1309.4819
54 A. V. Gritsan, R. Röntsch, M. Schulze, and M. Xiao Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to the heavy flavor fermions using matrix element techniques PRD 94 (2016) 055023 1606.03107
55 A. V. Gritsan et al. New features in the JHU generator framework: constraining Higgs boson properties from on-shell and off-shell production PRD 102 (2020) 056022 2002.09888
56 J. Davis et al. Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to virtual photons PRD 105 (2022) 096027 2109.13363
57 A. Ballestrero et al. PHANTOM: a Monte Carlo event generator for six parton final states at high energy colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 401 0801.3359
58 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
59 E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and A. Vicini Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM JHEP 02 (2012) 088 1111.2854
60 P. Nason and C. Oleari NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 02 (2010) 037 0911.5299
61 G. Luisoni, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and F. Tramontano $ \mathrm{H}\mathrm{W}^{\pm} $/HZ + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with the POWHEG BOX interfaced to GoSam and their merging within MiNLO JHEP 10 (2013) 083 1306.2542
62 H. B. Hartanto, B. Jager, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX PRD 91 (2015) 094003 1501.04498
63 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
64 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
65 S. Catani and M. Grazzini An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC PRL 98 (2007) 222002 hep-ph/0703012
66 M. Grazzini NNLO predictions for the Higgs boson signal in the $ \mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{W}\mathrm{W} \to\ell\nu\ell\nu $ and $ \mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} \to 4\ell $ decay channels JHEP 02 (2008) 043 0801.3232
67 M. Grazzini and H. Sargsyan Heavy-quark mass effects in Higgs boson production at the LHC JHEP 09 (2013) 129 1306.4581
68 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2 (2017) 1 1610.07922
69 F. Caola, K. Melnikov, R. Röntsch, and L. Tancredi QCD corrections to ZZ production in gluon fusion at the LHC PRD 92 (2015) 094028 1509.06734
70 K. Melnikov and M. Dowling Production of two Z-bosons in gluon fusion in the heavy top quark approximation PLB 744 (2015) 43 1503.01274
71 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, M. Czakon, and S. Kirchner Two loop correction to interference in $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ JHEP 08 (2016) 011 1605.01380
72 F. Caola et al. QCD corrections to vector boson pair production in gluon fusion including interference effects with off-shell Higgs at the LHC JHEP 07 (2016) 087 1605.04610
73 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
74 R. V. Harlander, S. Liebler, and H. Mantler SusHi: A program for the calculation of Higgs production in gluon fusion and bottom-quark annihilation in the standard model and the MSSM Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1605 1212.3249
75 M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and D. Rathlev ZZ production at the LHC: Fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD PLB 750 (2015) 407 1507.06257
76 A. Bierweiler, T. Kasprzik, and J. H. K \"u hn Vector-boson pair production at the LHC to $ \mathcal{O}(\alpha^3) $ accuracy JHEP 12 (2013) 071 1305.5402
77 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
78 T. Chen and C. Guestrin XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system link 1603.02754
79 CMS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 08 (2023) 040 CMS-HIG-21-009
2305.07532
80 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
81 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
82 A. Bodek et al. Extracting muon momentum scale corrections for hadron collider experiments EPJC 72 (2012) 2194 1208.3710
83 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
84 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2017) 047 CMS-HIG-16-041
1706.09936
85 CMS Collaboration Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings using production and decay information in the four-lepton final state PLB 775 (2017) 1 CMS-HIG-17-011
1707.00541
86 J. Davis et al. Maximizing returns: optimizing experimental observables at the LHC 2601.10822
87 CMS Collaboration The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 8 (2024) 19 CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
88 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
89 G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals PRD 57 (1998) 3873 physics/9711021
90 M. R. Whalley, D. Bourilkov, and R. C. Group The Les Houches accord PDFs (LHAPDF) and LHAGLUE in Proc. HERA and the LHC Workshop on the implications of HERA for LHC physics., 2005 hep-ph/0508110
91 D. Bourilkov, R. C. Group, and M. R. Whalley LHAPDF: PDF use from the Tevatron to the LHC in Proc. TeV4LHC Workshop - 4th meeting., 2006 hep-ph/0605240
92 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
93 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at 13 tev with the CMS detector CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2025
CMS-PAS-LUM-20-001
CMS-PAS-LUM-20-001
94 A. Dedes et al. Feynman rules for the standard model effective field theory in R$ _{\xi} $-gauges JHEP 06 (2017) 143 1704.03888
95 Y. Zhou Constraining the Higgs boson coupling to light quarks in the H$ {\rightarrow} $ ZZ final states PRD 93 (2016) 013019 1505.06369
96 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 4 (2013) 1307.1347
97 B. A. Erdelyi, R. Gröber, and N. Selimovi \' c How large can the light quark Yukawa couplings be? JHEP 05 (2025) 189 2410.08272
98 CMS Collaboration Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions in its production and decay using the four-lepton final state PRD 104 (2021) 052004 CMS-HIG-19-009
2104.12152
99 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson total decay width using the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{W}\mathrm{W}\to\mathrm{e}\nu\mu\nu $ decay channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRD 113 (2026) 092014 CMS-HIG-24-011
2601.05168
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN