CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SMP-25-008 ; CERN-EP-2026-232
Evidence for the dead-cone effect in bottom quark initiated jets produced in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
Submitted to Physical Review Letters
Abstract: The suppression of collinear gluon emissions from a massive quark, or the ``dead-cone effect,'' is the primary manifestation of quark mass effects in parton showers. A proton-proton collision data set recorded by the CMS experiment at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 59.8 fb$ ^{-1} $ is analyzed. A differential measurement is presented of the emission density of bottom quark jets, studied as a function of the angular separation between iteratively declustered subjets. The measurement is performed in bottom quark initiated jets with transverse momenta between 40 and 200 GeV originating from top quark pair production. Compared to data, a parton shower Monte Carlo model that includes the dead-cone effect is favored, while a model without the dead-cone effect is disfavored with a significance of 4.3 standard deviations.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
An illustration of the iterative declustering of a b quark jet to construct the Lund jet plane (LJP). The upper diagram shows the showering of a b quark (pointing arrow) ordered in descending angular separation between the b quark and the gluon radiation (curly line). The pink cones along the direction of the emitters represent the dead cones. The lower diagram shows the corresponding LJP, where each colored point corresponds to a declustering step in the upper diagram and the pink block indicates the region sensitive to the dead cone.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
An illustration of the iterative declustering of a b quark jet to construct the Lund jet plane (LJP). The upper diagram shows the showering of a b quark (pointing arrow) ordered in descending angular separation between the b quark and the gluon radiation (curly line). The pink cones along the direction of the emitters represent the dead cones. The lower diagram shows the corresponding LJP, where each colored point corresponds to a declustering step in the upper diagram and the pink block indicates the region sensitive to the dead cone.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
An illustration of the iterative declustering of a b quark jet to construct the Lund jet plane (LJP). The upper diagram shows the showering of a b quark (pointing arrow) ordered in descending angular separation between the b quark and the gluon radiation (curly line). The pink cones along the direction of the emitters represent the dead cones. The lower diagram shows the corresponding LJP, where each colored point corresponds to a declustering step in the upper diagram and the pink block indicates the region sensitive to the dead cone.

png pdf
Figure 2:
(Upper) Ratio of the emission density distribution between the b quark jets selected using either the DEEPJET b tagger or the T&P method to the b quark jets selected using generator-level information. (Lower) The detector-level and generator-level emission density distributions for b quark jets with 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV in the POWHEG +PYTHIA\ $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ sample are shown with and without the partial b hadron reconstruction, either with generator-level information or with the transformer encoder. The statistical uncertainties are too small to be visible in either panel.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
(Upper) Ratio of the emission density distribution between the b quark jets selected using either the DEEPJET b tagger or the T&P method to the b quark jets selected using generator-level information. (Lower) The detector-level and generator-level emission density distributions for b quark jets with 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV in the POWHEG +PYTHIA\ $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ sample are shown with and without the partial b hadron reconstruction, either with generator-level information or with the transformer encoder. The statistical uncertainties are too small to be visible in either panel.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
(Upper) Ratio of the emission density distribution between the b quark jets selected using either the DEEPJET b tagger or the T&P method to the b quark jets selected using generator-level information. (Lower) The detector-level and generator-level emission density distributions for b quark jets with 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV in the POWHEG +PYTHIA\ $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ sample are shown with and without the partial b hadron reconstruction, either with generator-level information or with the transformer encoder. The statistical uncertainties are too small to be visible in either panel.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
(Upper) Ratio of the emission density distribution between the b quark jets selected using either the DEEPJET b tagger or the T&P method to the b quark jets selected using generator-level information. (Lower) The detector-level and generator-level emission density distributions for b quark jets with 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV in the POWHEG +PYTHIA\ $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ sample are shown with and without the partial b hadron reconstruction, either with generator-level information or with the transformer encoder. The statistical uncertainties are too small to be visible in either panel.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
(Upper) Ratio of the emission density distribution between the b quark jets selected using either the DEEPJET b tagger or the T&P method to the b quark jets selected using generator-level information. (Lower) The detector-level and generator-level emission density distributions for b quark jets with 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV in the POWHEG +PYTHIA\ $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ sample are shown with and without the partial b hadron reconstruction, either with generator-level information or with the transformer encoder. The statistical uncertainties are too small to be visible in either panel.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The measured emission density per $ {\ln(R/{\Delta R})} $ for b quark jets with (upper) 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV and (lower) 80 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 200 GeV, with vertical error bars representing the total uncertainties. Data are compared with the generator-level distributions from different MC samples. The middle panels show the ratio of the data to the MC predictions with a dashed line at one for reference. The total uncertainties of the data are shown as the gray band. The lower panels show the breakdown of the data uncertainties into various sources.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The measured emission density per $ {\ln(R/{\Delta R})} $ for b quark jets with (upper) 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV and (lower) 80 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 200 GeV, with vertical error bars representing the total uncertainties. Data are compared with the generator-level distributions from different MC samples. The middle panels show the ratio of the data to the MC predictions with a dashed line at one for reference. The total uncertainties of the data are shown as the gray band. The lower panels show the breakdown of the data uncertainties into various sources.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The measured emission density per $ {\ln(R/{\Delta R})} $ for b quark jets with (upper) 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV and (lower) 80 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 200 GeV, with vertical error bars representing the total uncertainties. Data are compared with the generator-level distributions from different MC samples. The middle panels show the ratio of the data to the MC predictions with a dashed line at one for reference. The total uncertainties of the data are shown as the gray band. The lower panels show the breakdown of the data uncertainties into various sources.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The measured emission density per $ {\ln(R/{\Delta R})} $ for b quark jets with (upper) 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV and (lower) 80 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 200 GeV, with vertical error bars representing the total uncertainties. Data are compared with the generator-level distributions from different MC samples. The middle panels show the ratio of the data to the MC predictions with a dashed line at one for reference. The total uncertainties of the data are shown as the gray band. The lower panels show the breakdown of the data uncertainties into various sources.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
The measured emission density per $ {\ln(R/{\Delta R})} $ for b quark jets with (upper) 40 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 80 GeV and (lower) 80 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 200 GeV, with vertical error bars representing the total uncertainties. Data are compared with the generator-level distributions from different MC samples. The middle panels show the ratio of the data to the MC predictions with a dashed line at one for reference. The total uncertainties of the data are shown as the gray band. The lower panels show the breakdown of the data uncertainties into various sources.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Architecture of the transformer encoder trained to identify b hadron decay products in jets. Input to the network are three-dimensional arrays that represent the number of jets, the number of constituents in a jet, and the number of features. The first feed forward (FF1) block is a single-layered dense network that expands the feature dimension to 128. This is followed by the multihead attention (MHA) block with four heads, and another FF block (FF2) with two layers. Both blocks keep 128 hidden dimensions. Skip connections and layer normalizations (Add & norm) are added in between the MHA and FF1, and after FF2. The MHA, FF2, and Add & norm blocks are repeated together for four different times. The final block is a single-layered FF (FF3) that contracts the final output to two-dimensional arrays representing a sequence of probabilities for each constituent in a jet to be a b hadron decay product or not.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Architecture of the transformer encoder trained to identify b hadron decay products in jets. Input to the network are three-dimensional arrays that represent the number of jets, the number of constituents in a jet, and the number of features. The first feed forward (FF1) block is a single-layered dense network that expands the feature dimension to 128. This is followed by the multihead attention (MHA) block with four heads, and another FF block (FF2) with two layers. Both blocks keep 128 hidden dimensions. Skip connections and layer normalizations (Add & norm) are added in between the MHA and FF1, and after FF2. The MHA, FF2, and Add & norm blocks are repeated together for four different times. The final block is a single-layered FF (FF3) that contracts the final output to two-dimensional arrays representing a sequence of probabilities for each constituent in a jet to be a b hadron decay product or not.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Architecture of the transformer encoder trained to identify b hadron decay products in jets. Input to the network are three-dimensional arrays that represent the number of jets, the number of constituents in a jet, and the number of features. The first feed forward (FF1) block is a single-layered dense network that expands the feature dimension to 128. This is followed by the multihead attention (MHA) block with four heads, and another FF block (FF2) with two layers. Both blocks keep 128 hidden dimensions. Skip connections and layer normalizations (Add & norm) are added in between the MHA and FF1, and after FF2. The MHA, FF2, and Add & norm blocks are repeated together for four different times. The final block is a single-layered FF (FF3) that contracts the final output to two-dimensional arrays representing a sequence of probabilities for each constituent in a jet to be a b hadron decay product or not.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Performance of the TFE to identify b hadron decay products in jets in the training, testing, and validation sets of the POWHEG +PYTHIA dileptonic $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ sample.
Summary
In summary, a measurement of the emission density distribution in bottom quark initiated jets (b jets) from top quark pair events in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the CMS detector has been presented. A sample of b jets with minimized flavor tagging biases is selected with a tag-and-probe method. A transformer encoder is trained to partially reconstruct b hadrons in jets and preserve an uncontaminated angle-ordered emission history, reconstructed on the Lund jet plane [36][37]. A new experimental benchmark is provided to compare with analytical quantum chromodynamics predictions including the effect of quark masses [26][51] and for parton shower model development [50]. A suppression of collinear emissions relative to a light-quark simulation is shown by the measured emission density distribution. Compared to data, a parton shower Monte Carlo model that includes the dead-cone effect is favored, while a model without the dead-cone effect is disfavored with a significance of 4.3 standard deviations.
References
1 G. P. Salam Towards jetography EPJC 67 (2010) 637 0906.1833
2 A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and B. Nachman Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: a review of recent advances in theory and machine learning Phys. Rept. 841 (2020) 1 1709.04464
3 R. Kogler et al. Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: experimental review Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019) 045003 1803.06991
4 S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and M. Spannowsky Looking inside jets: an introduction to jet substructure and boosted-object phenomenology volume 958. Springer, arXiv:.2, 2019
link
5 CMS Collaboration Observation of Higgs boson decay to bottom quarks PRL 121 (2018) 121801 CMS-HIG-18-016
1808.08242
6 CMS Collaboration Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in final states with two bottom quarks and two photons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2021) 257 CMS-HIG-19-018
2011.12373
7 CMS Collaboration Search for Higgs boson pair production in the four b quark final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 129 (2022) 081802 CMS-HIG-20-005
2202.09617
8 CMS Collaboration Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in the four leptons plus two b jets final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2023) 130 CMS-HIG-20-004
2206.10657
9 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson production rate in association with top quarks in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying tau leptons at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 81 (2021) 378 CMS-HIG-19-008
2011.03652
10 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \textrm{t}\overline{\textrm{t}}\textrm{H} $ and tH production rates in the H $ \rightarrow \textrm{b}\overline{\textrm{b}} $ decay channel using proton-proton collision data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 02 (2025) 097 CMS-HIG-19-011
2407.10896
11 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{H} $ production and the CP structure of the Yukawa interaction between the Higgs boson and top quark in the diphoton decay channel PRL 125 (2020) 061801 CMS-HIG-19-013
2003.10866
12 CMS Collaboration Simultaneous probe of the charm and bottom quark Yukawa couplings using ttH events PRL 136 (2026) 011801 CMS-HIG-24-018
2509.22535
13 ATLAS, CMS Collaboration Combination of measurements of the top quark mass from data collected by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV PRL 132 (2024) 261902 2402.08713
14 CMS Collaboration Review of top quark mass measurements in CMS Phys. Rept. 1115 (2025) 116 CMS-TOP-23-003
2403.01313
15 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential $ \mathrm{t \bar t} $ production cross sections in the full kinematic range using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt {s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 104 (2021) 092013 CMS-TOP-20-001
2108.02803
16 ATLAS, CMS Collaboration Combination of inclusive top quark pair production cross section measurements using ATLAS and CMS data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 07 (2023) 213 2205.13830
17 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ production cross sections using top quarks at large transverse momenta in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 103 (2021) 052008 CMS-TOP-18-013
2008.07860
18 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{t\bar t} $ normalized multidifferential cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt s= $ 13 TeV, and simultaneous determination of the strong coupling strength, top quark pole mass, and parton distribution functions EPJC 80 (2020) 658 CMS-TOP-18-004
1904.05237
19 CMS Collaboration First measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13.6 TeV JHEP 08 (2023) 204 CMS-TOP-22-012
2303.10680
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for resonances in the mass distribution of jet pairs with one or two jets identified as b jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 98 (2018) 032016 1805.09299
21 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum JHEP 10 (2019) 244 CMS-SUS-19-006
1908.04722
22 ATLAS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in final states with missing transverse momentum and three or more b jets in 139 fb$ ^{-1} $ of proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 83 (2023) 561 2211.08028
23 Y. L. Dokshitzer, V. A. Khoze, and S. I. Troian On specific QCD properties of heavy quark fragmentation ('dead cone') JPG 17 (1991) 1602
24 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of particle physics PRD 110 (2024) 030001
25 L. Cunqueiro and M. P\l osko \'n Searching for the dead cone effects with iterative declustering of heavy-flavor jets PRD 99 (2019) 074027 1812.00102
26 A. Ghira, S. Marzani, and G. Soyez The Lund b jet plane JHEP 05 (2026) 247 2512.17408
27 DELPHI Collaboration Hadronization properties of b quarks compared to light quarks in e$ ^+ $ e$ ^- \to \mathrm{q} \overline{\mathrm{q}} $ from 183 to 200 GeV PLB 479 (2000) 118 hep-ex/0103022
28 CDF Collaboration Measurement of b jet shapes in inclusive jet production in $ \mathrm{p}\bar{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 78 (2008) 072005 0806.1699
29 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of jet shapes in top quark pair events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector EPJC 73 (2013) 2676 1307.5749
30 S. Kluth, W. Ochs, and R. Perez Ramos Observation of the dead cone effect in charm and bottom quark jets and its QCD explanation PRD 107 (2023) 094039 2303.13343
31 ALICE Collaboration Direct observation of the dead-cone effect in quantum chromodynamics Nature 605 (2022) 440 2106.05713
32 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the Lund plane for light- and beauty-quark jets PRD 112 (2025) 072015 2505.23530
33 CMS Collaboration Jet fragmentation function and groomed substructure of bottom quark jets in proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV JHEP 04 (2026) 147 CMS-HIN-24-005
2511.10666
34 CMS Collaboration Exploring small-angle emissions in charm quark jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV JHEP 05 (2026) 176 CMS-HIN-24-007
2507.13469
35 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with the CMS detector CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2025
CMS-PAS-LUM-20-001
CMS-PAS-LUM-20-001
36 B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, L. L ö nnblad, and U. Pettersson Coherence effects in deep inelastic scattering Z. Phys. C 43 (1989) 625
37 F. A. Dreyer, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The Lund jet plane JHEP 12 (2018) 064 1807.04758
38 ATLAS Collaboration Explaining the ATLAS GN2 flavor tagging algorithm with integrated gradients ATLAS Public Note ATL-PHYS-PUB-2025-029, 2025
39 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavor jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
40 CMS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive W and Z cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 01 (2011) 080 CMS-EWK-10-002
1012.2466
41 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
42 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
43 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of jet observables sensitive to b quark fragmentation in $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ events at the LHC with the ATLAS detector PRD 106 (2022) 032008 2202.13901
44 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Lund jet plane using charged particles in 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector PRL 124 (2020) 222002 2004.03540
45 ALICE Collaboration Measurement of the primary Lund jet plane density in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = \rm{13} $ TeV with ALICE PoS EPS-HEP 364, 2022
link
2111.00020
46 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the primary Lund jet plane density in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{\textrm{s}} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 05 (2024) 116 CMS-SMP-22-007
2312.16343
47 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of Lund subjet multiplicities in 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector PLB 859 (2024) 139090 2402.13052
48 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
49 Y. L. Dokshitzer, G. D. Leder, S. Moretti, and B. R. Webber Better jet clustering algorithms JHEP 08 (1997) 001 hep-ph/9707323
50 M. Dasgupta et al. Parton showers beyond leading logarithmic accuracy PRL 125 (2020) 052002 2002.11114
51 A. Lifson, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez Calculating the primary Lund jet plane density JHEP 10 (2020) 170 2007.06578
52 A. Buckley et al. rivet user manual Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 2803 1003.0694
53 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis link
54 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
55 CMS Collaboration Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3 JINST 19 (2024) P05064 CMS-PRF-21-001
2309.05466
56 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
57 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
58 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2 JINST 19 (2024) P11021 CMS-TRG-19-001
2410.17038
59 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
60 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
61 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
62 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
63 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{B}\bar{\mathrm{B}} $ angular correlations based on secondary vertex reconstruction at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 03 (2011) 136 CMS-BPH-10-010
1102.3194
64 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez Fastjet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
65 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
66 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
67 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of jet track functions in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 868 (2025) 139680 2502.02062
68 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
69 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the powheg method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
70 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the powheg box JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
71 S. Alioli et al. Jet pair production in powheg JHEP 04 (2011) 081 1012.3380
72 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in powheg JHEP 04 (2009) 002 0812.0578
73 E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and A. Vicini Higgs production via gluon fusion in the powheg approach in the SM and in the MSSM JHEP 02 (2012) 088 1111.2854
74 G. Heinrich et al. NLO predictions for Higgs boson pair production with full top quark mass dependence matched to parton showers JHEP 08 (2017) 088 1703.09252
75 G. Buchalla et al. Higgs boson pair production in non-linear effective field theory with full $ m_\mathrm{t} $-dependence at NLO QCD JHEP 09 (2018) 057 1806.05162
76 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in mc@nlo JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
77 T. Sj ö strand et al. An introduction to pythia 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
78 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS pythia 8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
79 NNPDF Collaboration Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
80 J. Bellm et al. herwig 7.0/herwig++ 3.0 release note EPJC 76 (2016) 196 1512.01178
81 CMS Collaboration Development and validation of herwig 7 tunes from CMS underlying-event measurements EPJC 81 (2021) 312 CMS-GEN-19-001
2011.03422
82 J. Bellm et al. The physics of herwig 7 2512.16645
83 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
84 E. Bols et al. Jet flavor classification using DeepJet JINST 15 (2020) P12012 2008.10519
85 et al. Attention is all you need A. Vaswani in Advances in neural information processing systems, I. Guyon et al., eds., volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc, 2017
link
1706.03762
86 G. D'Agostini A multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes' theorem NIM A 362 (1995) 487
87 L. Brenner et al. Comparison of unfolding methods using RooFitUnfold Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) 2050145 1910.14654
88 L. Demortier P values and nuisance parameters in Proc. Workshop on statistical issues for LHC physics, PHYSTAT-LHC\/, 2007
link
89 CMS Collaboration Tracking performances for charged pions with Run2 Legacy data CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2022-012, 2022
CDS
90 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
91 PDF4LHC Working Group Collaboration The PDF4LHC21 combination of global PDF fits for the LHC Run III JPG 49 (2022) 080501 2203.05506
92 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ differential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using events containing two leptons JHEP 02 (2019) 149 CMS-TOP-17-014
1811.06625
93 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV PRD 95 (2017) 092001 CMS-TOP-16-008
1610.04191
94 CMS Collaboration Performance of b tagging algorithms in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with Phase 1 CMS detector CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2018-033, 2018
CDS
95 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
96 B. Efron Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife Annals Statist. 7 (1979) 1
97 SLD Collaboration A measurement of $ R_{b} $ using a vertex mass tag PRL 80 (1998) 660 hep-ex/9708015
98 A. Paszke et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library in 3rd Int. Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems\/, Curran Associates Inc, 2019
Proc. 3 (2019) 12
1912.01703
99 J. Ansel et al. PyTorch 2: faster machine learning through dynamic python bytecode transformation and graph compilation in the ACM Int. Conf. on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems\/, ASPLOS '24, Association for Computing Machinery, 2024
Proc. 2 (2024) 929
100 I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter Decoupled weight decay regularization in Proc. Int. Conf. on Learning Representations\/, 2017 1711.05101
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN