CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SMP-22-001 ; CERN-EP-2023-285
Measurement of differential ZZ$+$jets production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
JHEP 10 (2024) 209
Abstract: Diboson production in association with jets is studied in the fully leptonic final states, $ \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \to (\mathrm{Z}/\gamma^*)(\mathrm{Z}/\gamma^*){+}$jets $\to 2\ell2\ell'{+}$jets, ($ \ell,\ell' = \mathrm{e} $ or $ \mu $) in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. Differential distributions and normalized differential cross sections are measured as a function of jet multiplicity, transverse momentum $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, pseudorapidity $ \eta $, invariant mass and $ \Delta\eta $ of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ and second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jets, and as a function of invariant mass of the four-lepton system for events with various jet multiplicities. These differential cross sections are compared with theoretical predictions that mostly agree with the experimental data. However, in a few regions we observe discrepancies between the predicted and measured values. Further improvement of the predictions is required to describe the ZZ$+$jets production in the whole phase space.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Example Feynman diagrams of ZZ production associated with jets via (left) quark-initiated production and (right) loop-induced gluon fusion production.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Example Feynman diagrams of ZZ production associated with jets via (left) quark-initiated production and (right) loop-induced gluon fusion production.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Example Feynman diagrams of ZZ production associated with jets via (left) quark-initiated production and (right) loop-induced gluon fusion production.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distribution of the number of jets with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 30 GeV (left) and of $ m_{\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}} $ (right) for ZZ+jets events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV for the combined 4e, 4$ \mu $, and 2e2$ \mu $ decay channels. Points represent the data, vertical bars the statistical uncertainties, and shaded histograms represent the expected standard model predictions and reducible background estimated from data. The gray band represents the systematic uncertainties in the predictions, which includes systematic uncertainties associated with trigger efficiency, lepton efficiencies, jet energy correction and jet energy resolution, pileup, luminosity, Monte Carlo generator choice, $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g} \! \to \! \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ cross section, and reducible background. The overflow is included in the last bin of the distributions.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distribution of the number of jets with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 30 GeV (left) and of $ m_{\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}} $ (right) for ZZ+jets events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV for the combined 4e, 4$ \mu $, and 2e2$ \mu $ decay channels. Points represent the data, vertical bars the statistical uncertainties, and shaded histograms represent the expected standard model predictions and reducible background estimated from data. The gray band represents the systematic uncertainties in the predictions, which includes systematic uncertainties associated with trigger efficiency, lepton efficiencies, jet energy correction and jet energy resolution, pileup, luminosity, Monte Carlo generator choice, $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g} \! \to \! \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ cross section, and reducible background. The overflow is included in the last bin of the distributions.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distribution of the number of jets with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 30 GeV (left) and of $ m_{\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}} $ (right) for ZZ+jets events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV for the combined 4e, 4$ \mu $, and 2e2$ \mu $ decay channels. Points represent the data, vertical bars the statistical uncertainties, and shaded histograms represent the expected standard model predictions and reducible background estimated from data. The gray band represents the systematic uncertainties in the predictions, which includes systematic uncertainties associated with trigger efficiency, lepton efficiencies, jet energy correction and jet energy resolution, pileup, luminosity, Monte Carlo generator choice, $ \mathrm{g}\mathrm{g} \! \to \! \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ cross section, and reducible background. The overflow is included in the last bin of the distributions.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distribution of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper left) in events with at least one jet, and of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper right) in events containing at least two jets. The $ |\eta| $ distribution of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower left) and second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower right) jets. Events are required to have 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distribution of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper left) in events with at least one jet, and of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper right) in events containing at least two jets. The $ |\eta| $ distribution of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower left) and second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower right) jets. Events are required to have 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distribution of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper left) in events with at least one jet, and of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper right) in events containing at least two jets. The $ |\eta| $ distribution of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower left) and second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower right) jets. Events are required to have 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Distribution of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper left) in events with at least one jet, and of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper right) in events containing at least two jets. The $ |\eta| $ distribution of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower left) and second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower right) jets. Events are required to have 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Distribution of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper left) in events with at least one jet, and of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet (upper right) in events containing at least two jets. The $ |\eta| $ distribution of the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower left) and second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ (lower right) jets. Events are required to have 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The dijet mass (left) and $ |\Delta \eta| $ (right) between the two highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jets in events with at least two jets. Events are required to have 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The dijet mass (left) and $ |\Delta \eta| $ (right) between the two highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jets in events with at least two jets. Events are required to have 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The dijet mass (left) and $ |\Delta \eta| $ (right) between the two highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jets in events with at least two jets. Events are required to have 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions for events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions for events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions for events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions for events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions for events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 5-e:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions for events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions in the full four-lepton invariant mass range for events with different jet multiplicities, normalized by bin width. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions in the full four-lepton invariant mass range for events with different jet multiplicities, normalized by bin width. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions in the full four-lepton invariant mass range for events with different jet multiplicities, normalized by bin width. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions in the full four-lepton invariant mass range for events with different jet multiplicities, normalized by bin width. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions in the full four-lepton invariant mass range for events with different jet multiplicities, normalized by bin width. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 6-e:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions in the full four-lepton invariant mass range for events with different jet multiplicities, normalized by bin width. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 6-f:
The $ m_{4\ell} $ distributions in the full four-lepton invariant mass range for events with different jet multiplicities, normalized by bin width. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 2.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of (left) $ m_{4\ell} $, (right) the number of jets with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 30 GeV. The on-shell Z requirement 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV is applied. Points represent the unfolded data, solid histograms the MadGraph-5_aMC@NLO $ \mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ predictions, and red dashed histograms the POWHEG $ \mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ predictions. MCFM $\mathrm{gg} \to \mathrm{ZZ} $, POWHEG $ \mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $, and MadGraph-5_aMC@NLO EW ZZ predictions are included in these two sets of predictions. The purple dashed histograms represent the nNNLO+PS predictions, and the yellow dashed histogram represents the nNNLO+PS prediction with EW corrections applied. Vertical bars on both MC predictions represent the statistical uncertainties. The lower panels show the ratio of the measured to the predicted cross sections. The shaded areas represent the total uncertainties calculated as the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic uncertainties, whereas the crosses represent the statistical uncertainties only. The overflow is included in the last bin of the distributions.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of (left) $ m_{4\ell} $, (right) the number of jets with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 30 GeV. The on-shell Z requirement 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV is applied. Points represent the unfolded data, solid histograms the MadGraph-5_aMC@NLO $ \mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ predictions, and red dashed histograms the POWHEG $ \mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ predictions. MCFM $\mathrm{gg} \to \mathrm{ZZ} $, POWHEG $ \mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $, and MadGraph-5_aMC@NLO EW ZZ predictions are included in these two sets of predictions. The purple dashed histograms represent the nNNLO+PS predictions, and the yellow dashed histogram represents the nNNLO+PS prediction with EW corrections applied. Vertical bars on both MC predictions represent the statistical uncertainties. The lower panels show the ratio of the measured to the predicted cross sections. The shaded areas represent the total uncertainties calculated as the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic uncertainties, whereas the crosses represent the statistical uncertainties only. The overflow is included in the last bin of the distributions.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of (left) $ m_{4\ell} $, (right) the number of jets with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 30 GeV. The on-shell Z requirement 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV is applied. Points represent the unfolded data, solid histograms the MadGraph-5_aMC@NLO $ \mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ predictions, and red dashed histograms the POWHEG $ \mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ predictions. MCFM $\mathrm{gg} \to \mathrm{ZZ} $, POWHEG $ \mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $, and MadGraph-5_aMC@NLO EW ZZ predictions are included in these two sets of predictions. The purple dashed histograms represent the nNNLO+PS predictions, and the yellow dashed histogram represents the nNNLO+PS prediction with EW corrections applied. Vertical bars on both MC predictions represent the statistical uncertainties. The lower panels show the ratio of the measured to the predicted cross sections. The shaded areas represent the total uncertainties calculated as the sum in quadrature of the statistical and systematic uncertainties, whereas the crosses represent the statistical uncertainties only. The overflow is included in the last bin of the distributions.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ and $ |\eta| $ of the highest- and the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet in events containing at least one or two jets, respectively. The on-shell Z requirement 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, $\mathrm{Z}_2 < $ 120 GeV is applied. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 7.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ and $ |\eta| $ of the highest- and the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet in events containing at least one or two jets, respectively. The on-shell Z requirement 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, $\mathrm{Z}_2 < $ 120 GeV is applied. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 7.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ and $ |\eta| $ of the highest- and the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet in events containing at least one or two jets, respectively. The on-shell Z requirement 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, $\mathrm{Z}_2 < $ 120 GeV is applied. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 7.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ and $ |\eta| $ of the highest- and the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet in events containing at least one or two jets, respectively. The on-shell Z requirement 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, $\mathrm{Z}_2 < $ 120 GeV is applied. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 7.

png pdf
Figure 8-d:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ and $ |\eta| $ of the highest- and the second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet in events containing at least one or two jets, respectively. The on-shell Z requirement 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, $\mathrm{Z}_2 < $ 120 GeV is applied. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 7.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of (left) $ |\Delta \eta| $ and (right) dijet mass between highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jets in events with at least two jets. Events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV requirement. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 7.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of (left) $ |\Delta \eta| $ and (right) dijet mass between highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jets in events with at least two jets. Events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV requirement. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 7.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of (left) $ |\Delta \eta| $ and (right) dijet mass between highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jets in events with at least two jets. Events with 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV requirement. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 7.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for the full four-lepton invariant mass range. Other details are as in the caption of Fig. 7.

png pdf
Figure 11:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and for different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and for different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and for different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.

png pdf
Figure 11-c:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and for different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.

png pdf
Figure 11-d:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1}$, ${\mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV and for different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.

png pdf
Figure 12:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for the full four-lepton invariant mass range and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.

png pdf
Figure 12-a:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for the full four-lepton invariant mass range and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.

png pdf
Figure 12-b:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for the full four-lepton invariant mass range and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.

png pdf
Figure 12-c:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for the full four-lepton invariant mass range and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.

png pdf
Figure 12-d:
Differential cross sections normalized to the fiducial cross section as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ for the full four-lepton invariant mass range and different jet multiplicities. Other details are as in the Fig. 7 caption.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Particle-level selections used to define the fiducial phase space

png pdf
Table 2:
Contributions of each source of systematic uncertainty to the normalized differential cross section measurements of jet variables. Uncertainties depend on the distributions and are listed as a range.

png pdf
Table 3:
The contributions of each source of systematic uncertainty in the normalized differential cross sections measurements as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ with jet multiplicity from 0 to 3 and more, in events satisfying 60 $ < m_{\mathrm{Z}_1, \mathrm{Z}_2} < $ 120 GeV.

png pdf
Table 4:
The contributions of each source of systematic uncertainty in the normalized differential cross sections measurements as a function of $ m_{4\ell} $ with jet multiplicity from 0 to 3 and more, in events from the full $ m_{4\ell} $ range.

png pdf
Table 5:
The observed and expected yields of ZZ events in different mass ranges, and estimated yields of background events, shown for each final state and for the sum. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second one is systematic. (Due to rounding, the sum of individual entries may not match the total value shown.)

png pdf
Table 6:
The observed and expected yields of ZZ events in different mass ranges, and estimated yields of background events, shown for each jet multiplicity. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second one is systematic. (Due to rounding, the sum of individual entries may not match the total value shown.)
Summary
The four-lepton production in association with jets, $ \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \to (\mathrm{Z}/\gamma^*)(\mathrm{Z}/\gamma^*) {+} \text{jets} \to 2\ell2\ell'{+}$jets, where $ \ell,\ell' = \mathrm{e} $ or $ \mu $, was studied in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ collected with the CMS detector at the LHC during 2016--2018. Differential distributions and differential cross sections normalized to the ZZ fiducial cross section were measured with respect to various kinematic variables: number of jets, jet transverse momentum ($ p_{\mathrm{T}} $) and pseudorapidity ($ \eta $), invariant mass of the dijet system and $ \eta $ difference between the highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ and second-highest-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ jets, and invariant mass of the four leptons ($ m_{4\ell} $) for different jet multiplicities. Tabulated results are provided in HEPData [59]. In general, predictions of theoretical models agree with the data, but in some regions significant discrepancies between predicted and measured values were observed. The recent nNNLO+PS prediction improves the data/prediction agreement in the 1-jet and high jet multiplicity regions, and describes the distribution of jet multiplicities better than NLO samples generated with the event generators MadGraph-5_aMC@NLO and POWHEG. The inclusion of electroweak corrections improves the description of the $ m_{4\ell} $ distribution. These measurements demonstrate the necessity for better Monte Carlo modeling in events with complex multiboson final states and extra jets. Further improvement of the predictions is required to describe the ZZ+jets production in the whole phase space.
References
1 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the ZZ production cross section and search for anomalous couplings in 2 $ \ell 2\ell' $ final states in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 01 (2013) 063 CMS-SMP-12-007
1211.4890
2 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ production cross section and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings in four-lepton final states at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV PLB 740 (2015) 250 CMS-SMP-13-005
1406.0113
3 CMS Collaboration Measurements of the ZZ production cross sections in the 2 $ \ell2\nu $ channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV and combined constraints on triple gauge couplings EPJC 75 (2015) 511 CMS-SMP-12-016
1503.05467
4 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the ZZ production cross section and $ \mathrm{Z} \to \ell^+\ell^-\ell^{\prime+}\ell^{\prime-} $ branching fraction in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 763 (2016) 280 CMS-SMP-16-001
1607.08834
5 CMS Collaboration Measurements of the $ \mathrm {p}\mathrm {p}\rightarrow \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ production cross section and the $ \mathrm{Z}\rightarrow 4\ell $ branching fraction, and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 78 (2018) 165 CMS-SMP-16-017
1709.08601
6 CMS Collaboration Measurements of the electroweak diboson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 5.02 TeV using leptonic decays PRL 127 (2021) 191801 CMS-SMP-20-012
2107.01137
7 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for Z boson pair production in association with jets at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 and 13 TeV PLB 789 (2019) 19 CMS-SMP-17-005
1806.11073
8 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ production cross sections and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 81 (2021) 200 CMS-SMP-19-001
2009.01186
9 CMS Collaboration Evidence for electroweak production of four charged leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 812 (2020) 135992 CMS-SMP-20-001
2008.07013
10 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of ZZ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV and limits on anomalous $ \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z} $ and $ \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}\gamma $ couplings with the ATLAS detector JHEP 03 (2013) 128 1211.6096
11 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of four-lepton production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 753 (2016) 552 1509.07844
12 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the ZZ production cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 116 (2016) 101801 1512.05314
13 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the four-lepton invariant mass spectrum in 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 04 (2019) 048 1902.05892
14 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of ZZ production in the $ \ell\ell\nu\nu $ final state with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 10 (2019) 127 1905.07163
15 ATLAS Collaboration $ ZZ \to \ell^{+}\ell^{-}\ell^{\prime +}\ell^{\prime -} $ cross-section measurements and search for anomalous triple gauge couplings in 13 TeV $ pp $ collisions with the ATLAS detector PRD 97 (2018) 032005 1709.07703
16 F. Cascioli et al. ZZ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD PLB 735 (2014) 311 1405.2219
17 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
18 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
19 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 07 (2008) 060 0805.4802
20 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
21 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
22 L. Buonocore et al. ZZ production at nNNLO+PS with MiNNLO$ _{PS} $ JHEP 01 (2022) 072 2108.05337
23 S. Alioli, S. Ferrario Ravasio, J. M. Lindert, and R. Röntsch Four-lepton production in gluon fusion at NLO matched to parton showers EPJC 81 (2021) 687 2102.07783
24 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
25 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
26 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
27 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
28 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
29 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
30 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
31 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
32 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
33 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 10 (2010) 205 1007.3492
34 F. Caola, K. Melnikov, R. Röntsch, and L. Tancredi QCD corrections to ZZ production in gluon fusion at the LHC PRD 92 (2015) 094028 1509.06734
35 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
36 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
37 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
38 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
39 P. F. Monni et al. MiNNLO$ _{PS} $: a new method to match NNLO QCD to parton showers JHEP 05 (2020) 143 1908.06987
40 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
41 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
42 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
43 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
44 CMS Collaboration Measurements of production cross sections of the Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 81 (2021) 488 CMS-HIG-19-001
2103.04956
45 CMS Collaboration Muon identification using multivariate techniques in the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Accepted by JINST, 2023 CMS-MUO-22-001
2310.03844
46 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
47 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
48 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
49 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
50 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
51 CMS Collaboration Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2017
CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
52 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
53 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
54 Particle Data Group , R. L. Workman et al. Review of particle physics Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022 (2022) 083C01
55 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state PRD 89 (2014) 092007 CMS-HIG-13-002
1312.5353
56 G. D'Agostini A multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes' theorem NIM A 362 (1995) 487
57 T. Adye Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold in PHYSTAT 2011, CERN, 2011
link
1105.1160
58 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
59 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
60 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis link
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN