CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-HIG-25-012
Analysis of the $ CP $ structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13.6 TeV
Abstract: This note presents a measurement of the charge-parity ($ CP $) structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and tau leptons, using proton-proton collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13.6 TeV recorded by the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 62.4 fb$ ^{-1} $. Angular correlations between the decay products of tau leptons produced in $ \text{H}\to\tau\tau $ decays are exploited to constrain the effective $ CP $ mixing angle $ \alpha^{\text{H}\tau\tau} $, which parameterizes the admixture of scalar and pseudoscalar couplings. The mixing angle is measured to be $ \alpha^{\text{H}\tau\tau} = $ 36 $ ^{+33}_{-30} $ ^\circ, compared with an expected value of 0 $ \pm $ 19 $ ^\circ $ under the standard model hypothesis. When combined with the previous CMS measurement using data collected at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $, the mixing angle is determined to be 7 $ \pm $ 16 $ ^\circ $, compared with an expected value of 0 $ \pm $ 14 $ ^\circ $. This result represents the most precise measurement by CMS of the $ CP $ nature of the Higgs boson coupling to tau leptons, with an expected precision that is the best achieved by any experiment to date.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Illustration of the reconstruction of $ \phi_{{CP} } $. The frame is defined such that the sum of the $ \vec{\textrm{P}}^{*\pm} $ vectors is zero. The $ \phi_{{CP} } $ angle is reconstructed from $ \vec{\textrm{R}}^{*\pm}_\perp $ and $ \vec{\textrm{P}}^{*\pm} $.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The post-fit BDT score distributions for the Genuine (left) and Mis-ID categories (right) in the $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel. The distributions are inclusive in $ \tau_\mathrm{h} $ decay mode. In the lower panels, the data divided by the expectation is displayed. The uncertainty band accounts for all sources of systematic uncertainty in the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The post-fit BDT score distributions for the Genuine (left) and Mis-ID categories (right) in the $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel. The distributions are inclusive in $ \tau_\mathrm{h} $ decay mode. In the lower panels, the data divided by the expectation is displayed. The uncertainty band accounts for all sources of systematic uncertainty in the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The post-fit BDT score distributions for the Genuine (left) and Mis-ID categories (right) in the $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channel. The distributions are inclusive in $ \tau_\mathrm{h} $ decay mode. In the lower panels, the data divided by the expectation is displayed. The uncertainty band accounts for all sources of systematic uncertainty in the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3:
From top to bottom: distributions of $ \phi_{{CP} } $ in the $ \rho\rho $, and $ \pi\rho $, and $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $ channels in windows of increasing BDT score, shown on top of each window. In the lower panels, the data divided by the expectation (including signal for the best-fit $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} $) is displayed. The uncertainty band accounts for all sources of systematic uncertainty in the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
From top to bottom: distributions of $ \phi_{{CP} } $ in the $ \rho\rho $, and $ \pi\rho $, and $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $ channels in windows of increasing BDT score, shown on top of each window. In the lower panels, the data divided by the expectation (including signal for the best-fit $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} $) is displayed. The uncertainty band accounts for all sources of systematic uncertainty in the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
From top to bottom: distributions of $ \phi_{{CP} } $ in the $ \rho\rho $, and $ \pi\rho $, and $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $ channels in windows of increasing BDT score, shown on top of each window. In the lower panels, the data divided by the expectation (including signal for the best-fit $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} $) is displayed. The uncertainty band accounts for all sources of systematic uncertainty in the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
From top to bottom: distributions of $ \phi_{{CP} } $ in the $ \rho\rho $, and $ \pi\rho $, and $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $ channels in windows of increasing BDT score, shown on top of each window. In the lower panels, the data divided by the expectation (including signal for the best-fit $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} $) is displayed. The uncertainty band accounts for all sources of systematic uncertainty in the prediction.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Negative log-likelihood scan for the combination of the $ \tau_{\mathrm{e}}\tau_\mathrm{h} $, $ \tau_{\mu}\tau_\mathrm{h} $, and $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channels in 13.6 TeV data. The best-fit value of $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} $ is found to be 36 $ ^{+33}_{-30} $ ^\circ, compared with an expected value of 0 $ \pm $ 19 $ ^{\circ} $.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Negative log-likelihood scan for the combination of the $ \tau_{\mathrm{e}}\tau_\mathrm{h} $, $ \tau_{\mu}\tau_\mathrm{h} $, and $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channels in 13 and 13.6 TeV data. The best-fit value of $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} $ is 7 $ \pm $ 16 $ ^\circ $ compared with an expected value of 0 $ \pm $ 14 $ ^\circ $.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The $ \phi_{{CP} } $ distributions for the $ \rho\rho $, $ \pi\rho $, $ \mu\rho $, and $ \mathrm{e}\rho $ channels in 13 and 13.6 TeV data, and the $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $, $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{1pr}}+\mathrm{a_{1}^{1pr}}\mathrm{a_{1}^{1pr}} $, $ \mu\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $, and $ \mathrm{e}\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $ channels in 13.6 TeV data, are weighed by $ A\:S/(S+B) $ and combined. The upper plot includes only the 13.6 TeV data, while the lower plot shows the combination of the 13 and 13.6 TeV data. Events are included from all BDT score bins in the signal categories. The background is subtracted from the data. The $ CP $ -even distribution is depicted in red, the $ CP $ -odd is displayed in blue, and a mixed- $ CP $ distribution ($ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau}=45^{\circ} $) is shown in green. In the predictions, the cross section times branching fraction are taken from their best fit values. The grey uncertainty band indicates the uncertainty in the subtracted background component. In combining the channels, a phase-shift was applied to the channels where the $ \phi_{{CP} } $ has a different phase with respect to the $ \rho\rho $ channel.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The $ \phi_{{CP} } $ distributions for the $ \rho\rho $, $ \pi\rho $, $ \mu\rho $, and $ \mathrm{e}\rho $ channels in 13 and 13.6 TeV data, and the $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $, $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{1pr}}+\mathrm{a_{1}^{1pr}}\mathrm{a_{1}^{1pr}} $, $ \mu\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $, and $ \mathrm{e}\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $ channels in 13.6 TeV data, are weighed by $ A\:S/(S+B) $ and combined. The upper plot includes only the 13.6 TeV data, while the lower plot shows the combination of the 13 and 13.6 TeV data. Events are included from all BDT score bins in the signal categories. The background is subtracted from the data. The $ CP $ -even distribution is depicted in red, the $ CP $ -odd is displayed in blue, and a mixed- $ CP $ distribution ($ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau}=45^{\circ} $) is shown in green. In the predictions, the cross section times branching fraction are taken from their best fit values. The grey uncertainty band indicates the uncertainty in the subtracted background component. In combining the channels, a phase-shift was applied to the channels where the $ \phi_{{CP} } $ has a different phase with respect to the $ \rho\rho $ channel.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The $ \phi_{{CP} } $ distributions for the $ \rho\rho $, $ \pi\rho $, $ \mu\rho $, and $ \mathrm{e}\rho $ channels in 13 and 13.6 TeV data, and the $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $, $ \rho\mathrm{a_{1}^{1pr}}+\mathrm{a_{1}^{1pr}}\mathrm{a_{1}^{1pr}} $, $ \mu\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $, and $ \mathrm{e}\mathrm{a_{1}^{3pr}} $ channels in 13.6 TeV data, are weighed by $ A\:S/(S+B) $ and combined. The upper plot includes only the 13.6 TeV data, while the lower plot shows the combination of the 13 and 13.6 TeV data. Events are included from all BDT score bins in the signal categories. The background is subtracted from the data. The $ CP $ -even distribution is depicted in red, the $ CP $ -odd is displayed in blue, and a mixed- $ CP $ distribution ($ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau}=45^{\circ} $) is shown in green. In the predictions, the cross section times branching fraction are taken from their best fit values. The grey uncertainty band indicates the uncertainty in the subtracted background component. In combining the channels, a phase-shift was applied to the channels where the $ \phi_{{CP} } $ has a different phase with respect to the $ \rho\rho $ channel.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Observed scan of $ -2\Delta\ln L $ for $ \mu $ against $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} $ for the combination of the 13 and 13.6 TeV measurements. The red marker indicates the SM prediction, and the black marker indicates the best fit to the data.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Observed scan of $ -2\Delta\ln L $ for the reduced $ CP $ -odd ($ \widetilde{\kappa}_\tau $) coupling against the reduced $ CP $ -even ($ \kappa_\tau $) coupling for the combination of the 13 and 13.6 TeV measurements. The red marker indicates the SM prediction, and the black marker indicates the best fit to the data.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Projections of the expected likelihood scans to an integrated luminosity of 3$ \text{ab}^{-1}$ under two systematic uncertainty scenarios: all systematic uncertainties kept constant with respect to the 13.6 TeV analysis (blue) and no systematic uncertainties (red). The expected precision on $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} $ is $ 3^\circ $ in all scenarios.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Decay modes of $ \tau $ leptons used in this analysis and their branching fractions $ \mathcal{B} $ [66]. Where appropriate, we indicate the known intermediate resonances. The last row gives the shorthand notation for the decays used throughout this note.

png pdf
Table 2:
Kinematic trigger and offline requirements applied to the $ \tau_{\mathrm{e}}\tau_\mathrm{h} $, $ \tau_{\mu}\tau_\mathrm{h} $, and $ \tau_\mathrm{h}\tau_\mathrm{h} $ channels. The $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ requirement is indicated in parentheses (in GeVns). The $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ thresholds indicated for the jet apply only for the object matched to the jet leg of the di-$ \tau $ plus jet trigger.
Summary
A measurement of the effective $ CP $ mixing angle $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} $ between scalar and pseudoscalar $ \mathrm{H}\to\tau\tau $ couplings has been presented, using proton-proton collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13.6 TeV recorded by the CMS detector in 2022 and 2023, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 62.4 fb$ ^{-1} $. The mixing angle is measured to be $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} = $ 36 $ ^{+33}_{-30} $ ^\circ, compared with an expected value of 0 $ \pm $ 19 $ ^\circ $. When combined with the previous CMS measurement using data collected at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV, the mixing angle is determined to be $ \alpha^{\mathrm{H}\tau\tau} = $ 7 $ \pm $ 16 $ ^\circ $, compared with an expected value of 0 $ \pm $ 14 $ ^\circ $. This represents the most precise measurement by CMS of the $ CP $ nature of the Higgs boson coupling to tau leptons, with an expected precision that is the best achieved by any experiment to date. Finally, a projection is made for the expected precision of the measurement at the end of the high luminosity LHC, which is found to be approximately $ 3^\circ $.
References
1 F. Englert and R. Brout Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons PRL 13 (1964) 321
2 P. W. Higgs Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields PL 12 (1964) 132
3 P. W. Higgs Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons PRL 13 (1964) 508
4 G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble Global conservation laws and massless particles PRL 13 (1964) 585
5 P. W. Higgs Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons PR 145 (1966) 1156
6 T. W. B. Kibble Symmetry breaking in non-abelian gauge theories PR 155 (1967) 1554
7 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
8 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
9 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
10 CMS Collaboration Combined measurements and interpretations of Higgs boson production and decay in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Submitted to Rep. Prog. Phys, 2026 CMS-HIG-21-018
2602.18611
11 ATLAS Collaboration Interpretations of the ATLAS measurements of Higgs boson production and decay rates and differential cross-sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2024) 97 2402.05742
12 A. D. Sakharov Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5 (1967) 32
13 M. B. Gavela et al. Standard model CP violation and baryon asymmetry. Part 2: Finite temperature NPB 430 (1994) 382 hep-ph/9406289
14 T. Biekotter et al. Impact of new experimental data on the C2HDM: the strong interdependence between LHC Higgs data and the electron EDM JHEP 05 (2024) 127 2403.02425
15 S. F. King, M. M \"u hlleitner, R. Nevzorov, and K. Walz Exploring the $ CP $-violating NMSSM: EDM constraints and phenomenology NPB 901 (2015) 526 1508.03255
16 CMS Collaboration On the mass and spin-parity of the Higgs boson candidate via its decays to Z boson pairs PRL 110 (2013) 081803 CMS-HIG-12-041
1212.6639
17 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state PRD 89 (2014) 092007 CMS-HIG-13-002
1312.5353
18 CMS Collaboration Constraints on the spin-parity and anomalous HVV couplings of the Higgs boson in proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV PRD 92 (2015) 012004 CMS-HIG-14-018
1411.3441
19 CMS Collaboration Combined search for anomalous pseudoscalar $ \mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V} $ couplings in $ \mathrm{V}\mathrm{H}(\mathrm{H}\to \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $) production and $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V} $ decay PLB 759 (2016) 672 CMS-HIG-14-035
1602.04305
20 CMS Collaboration Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings using production and decay information in the four-lepton final state PLB 775 (2017) 1 CMS-HIG-17-011
1707.00541
21 CMS Collaboration Constraints on anomalous HVV couplings from the production of Higgs bosons decaying to $ \tau $ lepton pairs PRD 100 (2019) 112002 CMS-HIG-17-034
1903.06973
22 CMS Collaboration Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions in its production and decay using the four-lepton final state PRD 104 (2021) 052004 CMS-HIG-19-009
2104.12152
23 ATLAS Collaboration Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data PLB 726 (2013) 120 1307.1432
24 ATLAS Collaboration Study of the spin and parity of the Higgs boson in diboson decays with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 476 1506.05669
25 ATLAS Collaboration Test of $ CP $ invariance in vector-boson fusion production of the Higgs boson using the optimal observable method in the ditau decay channel with the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016) 658 1602.04516
26 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson coupling properties in the $ \mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{Z}\mathrm{Z}^* \to 4\ell $ decay channel at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 03 (2018) 095 1712.02304
27 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of Higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel with 36 fb$ ^{-1} $ of pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 98 (2018) 052005 1802.04146
28 CMS Collaboration Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions analyzing the gamma gamma final state CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2025
CMS-PAS-HIG-24-006
CMS-PAS-HIG-24-006
29 A. V. Gritsan, R. Röntsch, M. Schulze, and M. Xiao Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to the heavy-flavor fermions using matrix element techniques PRD 94 (2016) 055023 1606.03107
30 Y. Kats and D. Uzan Prospects for measuring quark polarization and spin correlations in $ b\overline{b } $ and $ c\overline{c } $ samples at the LHC JHEP 03 (2024) 063 2311.08226
31 CMS Collaboration Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions from the production of Higgs bosons using the \ensuremath\tau\ensuremath\tau final state PRD 108 (2023) 032013 CMS-HIG-20-007
2205.05120
32 CMS Collaboration Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings from its production and decay using the WW channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 13 \text {TeV} $ EPJC 84 (2024) 779 CMS-HIG-22-008
2403.00657
33 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of Higgs boson production via gluon-gluon fusion and vector-boson fusion using $ H\rightarrow WW^*\rightarrow \ell \nu \ell \nu $ decays in pp collisions with the ATLAS detector and their effective field theory interpretations EPJC 85 (2025) 1403 2504.07686
34 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \mathrm{H} $ production and the $ CP $ structure of the Yukawa interaction between the Higgs boson and top quark in the diphoton decay channel PRL 125 (2020) 061801 CMS-HIG-19-013
2003.10866
35 ATLAS Collaboration $ CP $ properties of Higgs boson interactions with top quarks in the $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \mathrm{H} $ and $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{H} $ processes using $ \mathrm{H} \to \gamma\gamma $ with the ATLAS detector PRL 125 (2020) 061802 2004.04545
36 CMS Collaboration Search for $ CP $ violation in ttH and tH production in multilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2023) 092 CMS-HIG-21-006
2208.02686
37 ATLAS Collaboration Probing the $ CP $ nature of the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling in $ \textrm{t}\overline{\textrm{t}}\textrm{H} $ and $ \textrm{t}\overline{\textrm{t}}\textrm{H} $ events with H $ \rightarrow \textrm{b}\overline{\textrm{b}} $ decays using the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 849 (2024) 138469 2303.05974
38 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \textrm{t}\overline{\textrm{t}}\textrm{H} $ and tH production rates in the H $ \rightarrow \textrm{b}\overline{\textrm{b}} $ decay channel using proton-proton collision data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 02 (2025) 097 CMS-HIG-19-011
2407.10896
39 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in multilepton final states in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector Submitted to JHEP, 2025 2510.23755
40 T. Roussy et al. An improved bound on the electron\textquoterights electric dipole moment Science 381 (2023) 46 2212.11841
41 H. Bahl et al. Constraining the CP structure of Higgs-fermion couplings with a global LHC fit, the electron EDM and baryogenesis EPJC 82 (2022) 604 2202.11753
42 CMS Collaboration Analysis of the CP structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and $ \tau $ leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2022) 012 CMS-HIG-20-006
2110.04836
43 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the CP properties of Higgs boson interactions with $ \tau $-leptons with the ATLAS detector EPJC 83 (2023) 563 2212.05833
44 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
45 CMS Collaboration Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3 JINST 19 (2024) P05064 CMS-PRF-21-001
2309.05466
46 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
47 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
48 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2 JINST 19 (2024) P11021 CMS-TRG-19-001
2410.17038
49 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
50 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
51 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
52 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
53 K. Rose Deterministic annealing for clustering, compression, classification, regression, and related optimization problems Proc. IEEE 86 (1998) 2210
54 W. Waltenberger, R. Fruhwirth, and P. Vanlaer Adaptive vertex fitting J. Phys. G, Nuc. Part. Phys. 34 (2007) N343
55 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
56 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
57 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
58 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
59 D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran Pileup per particle identification JHEP 10 (2014) 059 1407.6013
60 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
61 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
62 CMS Collaboration ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run2 summary plots CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2020-021, 2020
CDS
63 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
64 CMS Collaboration Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network JINST 17 (2022) P07023 CMS-TAU-20-001
2201.08458
65 CMS Collaboration Identification of tau leptons using a convolutional neural network with domain adaptation JINST 20 (2025) P12032 CMS-TAU-24-001
2511.05468
66 Particle Data Group , P. A. Zyla et al. Review of particle physics Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020 (2020) 083C01
67 H. Qu and L. Gouskos Jet tagging via particle clouds PRD 101 (2020) 056019 1902.08570
68 S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and S. Kirchner Determination of the Higgs $ CP $-mixing angle in the tau decay channels Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 27 (2016) 273-275 841 1410.6362
69 S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, B. Niepelt, and H. Spiesberger How to pin down the CP quantum numbers of a Higgs boson in its tau decays at the LHC PRD 84 (2011) 116003 1108.0670
70 M. Kramer, J. H. Kuhn, M. L. Stong, and P. M. Zerwas Prospects of measuring the parity of Higgs particles Z. Phys. C 64 (1994) 21 hep-ph/9404280
71 G. R. Bower, T. Pierzchala, Z. Was, and M. Worek Measuring the Higgs boson's parity using $ \tau \to \rho \nu $ PLB 543 (2002) 227 hep-ph/0204292
72 K. Desch, Z. Was, and M. Worek Measuring the Higgs boson parity at a linear collider using $ \tau $ impact parameter and $ \tau \to \rho \nu $ decay EPJC 29 (2003) 491 hep-ph/0302046
73 K. Desch, A. Imhof, Z. Was, and M. Worek Probing the CP nature of the Higgs boson at linear colliders with tau spin correlations: The case of mixed scalar - pseudoscalar couplings PLB 579 (2004) 157 hep-ph/0307331
74 S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and J. Ziethe Determining the CP parity of Higgs bosons at the LHC in their tau decay channels PRL 100 (2008) 171605 0801.2297
75 S. Berge and W. Bernreuther Determining the CP parity of Higgs bosons at the LHC in the tau to 1-prong decay channels PLB 671 (2009) 470 0812.1910
76 S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and H. Spiesberger Higgs CP properties using the $ \tau $ decay modes at the ILC PLB 727 (2013) 488 1308.2674
77 S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and S. Kirchner Determination of the Higgs CP-mixing angle in the tau decay channels at the LHC including the Drell-Yan background EPJC 74 (2014) 3164 1408.0798
78 S. Berge, W. Bernreuther, and S. Kirchner Prospects of constraining the Higgs boson\textquoterights CP nature in the tau decay channel at the LHC PRD 92 (2015) 096012 1510.03850
79 R. J \'o zefowicz, E. Richter-Was, and Z. Was Potential for optimizing the Higgs boson CP measurement in H $ \to \tau \tau $ decays at the LHC including machine learning techniques PRD 94 (2016) 093001 1608.02609
80 V. Cherepanov, E. Richter-Was, and Z. Was Monte Carlo, fitting and machine learning for tau leptons SciPost Phys. Proc. 1 (2019) 018 1811.03969
81 A. Cardini Methodologies to measure the $ \mathcal {CP} $ structure of the Higgs Yukawa coupling to tau leptons Universe 8 (2022) 256
82 V. Cherepanov and A. Zotz Kinematic reconstruction of $ \mathrm{Z}/\mathrm{H} \to \tau\tau $ decay in proton-proton collisions 1805.06988
83 A. Kalinowski and W. Matyszkiewicz Efficient tau-pair invariant mass reconstruction with simplified matrix element techniques Nima A 1086 (2026) 171318 2509.26069
84 M. Davier, L. Duflot, F. Le Diberder, and A. Rouge The optimal method for the measurement of tau polarization PLB 306 (1993) 411
85 V. Cherepanov and C. Veelken The polarimeter vector for \ensuremath\tau $ \rightarrow $ 3\ensuremath\pi\ensuremath\nu\ensuremath\tau decays Comput. Phys. Commun. 299 (2024) 109153 2311.10490
86 S. Jadach, J. H. Kuhn, and Z. W \c a s TAUOLA: A library of Monte Carlo programs to simulate decays of polarized $ \tau $ leptons Comput. Phys. Commun. 64 (1990) 275
87 M. Jezabek, Z. W \c a s, S. Jadach, and J. H. Kuhn The $ \tau $ decay library TAUOLA, update with exact O(alpha) QED corrections in $ \tau\to\mu(\mathrm{e})\nu\overline{\nu} $ decay modes Comput. Phys. Commun. 70 (1992) 69
88 S. Jadach, Z. W \c a s, R. Decker, and J. H. Kuhn The $ \tau $ decay library TAUOLA: Version 2.4 Comput. Phys. Commun. 76 (1993) 361
89 CLEO Collaboration Hadronic structure in the decay $ \tau\to\nu_{\!\tau}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}\pi^{0} $ and the sign of the $ \nu_{\!\tau} $ helicity PRD 61 (2000) 012002 hep-ex/9902022
90 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
91 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
92 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
93 P. Nason and C. Oleari NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 02 (2010) 037 0911.5299
94 T. Je \v z o and P. Nason On the treatment of resonances in next-to-leading order calculations matched to a parton shower JHEP 12 (2015) 065 1509.09071
95 F. Granata, J. M. Lindert, C. Oleari, and S. Pozzorini NLO QCD+EW predictions for HV and HV+jet production including parton-shower effects JHEP 09 (2017) 012 1706.03522
96 P. Nason, C. Oleari, M. Rocco, and M. Zaro An interface between the POWHEG BOX and MadGraph5$ \_ $aMC@NLO EPJC 80 (2020) 985 2008.06364
97 D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini, and D. Tommasini Higgs boson production at the LHC: transverse momentum resummation effects in the $ H\to \gamma\gamma $, $ H\to WW\to l\nu l\nu $ and $ H\to ZZ\to 4l $ decay modes JHEP 06 (2012) 132 1203.6321
98 S. Dawson Radiative corrections to higgs boson production Nuclear Physics B 359 (1991) 283
99 A. Djouadi, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Production of Higgs bosons in proton colliders. QCD corrections Physics Letters B 264 (1991) 440
100 D. Graudenz, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas QCD corrections to Higgs-boson production at proton-proton colliders PRL 70 (1993) 1372
101 M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P. M. Zerwas Higgs boson production at the LHC NPB 453 (1995) 17 hep-ph/9504378
102 C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD NPB 646 (2002) 220 hep-ph/0207004
103 R. V. Harlander and W. B. Kilgore Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at hadron colliders PRL 88 (2002) 201801 hep-ph/0201206
104 V. Ravindran, J. Smith, and W. L. van Neerven NNLO corrections to the total cross-section for Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions NPB 665 (2003) 325 hep-ph/0302135
105 U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, and A. Vicini Two loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays PLB 595 (2004) 432 hep-ph/0404071
106 S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm, and S. Uccirati NLO electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production at hadron colliders PLB 670 (2008) 12 0809.1301
107 S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm, and S. Uccirati NNLO Computational Techniques: The Cases $ H\to\gamma\gamma $ and $ H\to gg $ NPB 811 (2009) 182 0809.3667
108 C. Anastasiou, R. Boughezal, and F. Petriello Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion JHEP 04 (2009) 003 0811.3458
109 R. V. Harlander and K. J. Ozeren Top mass effects in Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD: Virtual corrections PLB 679 (2009) 467 0907.2997
110 R. V. Harlander and K. J. Ozeren Finite top mass effects for hadronic Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order JHEP 11 (2009) 088 0909.3420
111 A. Pak, M. Rogal, and M. Steinhauser Finite top quark mass effects in NNLO Higgs boson production at LHC JHEP 02 (2010) 025 0911.4662
112 R. V. Harlander, H. Mantler, S. Marzani, and K. J. Ozeren Higgs production in gluon fusion at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD for finite top mass EPJC 66 (2010) 359 0912.2104
113 C. Anastasiou et al. Higgs boson gluon-fusion production at threshold in N$ ^3 $LO QCD PLB 737 (2014) 325 1403.4616
114 C. Anastasiou et al. Higgs boson gluon-fusion production beyond threshold in N$ ^{3}LO $ QCD JHEP 03 (2015) 091 1411.3584
115 C. Anastasiou et al. Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in QCD at three loops PRL 114 (2015) 212001 1503.06056
116 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Collaboration Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2 (2017) 1 1610.07922
117 A. Karlberg et al. Ad interim recommendations for the Higgs boson production cross sections at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13.6 TeV link 2402.09955
118 M. Ciccolini, A. Denner, and S. Dittmaier Strong and electroweak corrections to the production of Higgs + 2jets via weak interactions at the LHC PRL 99 (2007) 161803 0707.0381
119 M. Ciccolini, A. Denner, and S. Dittmaier Electroweak and QCD corrections to Higgs production via vector-boson fusion at the LHC PRD 77 (2008) 013002 0710.4749
120 A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit, and A. M \"u ck HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 195 (2015) 161 1412.5390
121 M. Cacciari et al. Fully differential vector-boson-fusion Higgs production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order PRL 115 (2015) 082002 1506.02660
122 O. Brein, A. Djouadi, and R. Harlander NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes at hadron colliders PLB 579 (2004) 149 hep-ph/0307206
123 A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit, and A. Muck Electroweak corrections to Higgs-strahlung off W/Z bosons at the Tevatron and the LHC with HAWK JHEP 03 (2012) 075 1112.5142
124 O. Brein, R. V. Harlander, and T. J. E. Zirke vh@nnlo - Higgs Strahlung at hadron colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 998 1210.5347
125 L. Altenkamp et al. Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD JHEP 02 (2013) 078 1211.5015
126 R. V. Harlander, S. Liebler, and T. Zirke Higgs strahlung at the large hadron collider in the 2-Higgs-doublet model JHEP 02 (2014) 023 1307.8122
127 R. V. Harlander, A. Kulesza, V. Theeuwes, and T. Zirke Soft gluon resummation for gluon-induced Higgs strahlung JHEP 11 (2014) 082 1410.0217
128 A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, and M. Spira HDECAY: A program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998) 56 hep-ph/9704448
129 M. Spira QCD effects in Higgs physics Fortsch. Phys. 46 (1998) 203 hep-ph/9705337
130 A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and M. M. Weber Precise predictions for the Higgs-boson decay $ H \to WW/ZZ \to $ 4 leptons PRD 74 (2006) 013004 hep-ph/0604011
131 A. Djouadi, M. M. Muhlleitner, and M. Spira Decays of supersymmetric particles: The program SUSY-HIT (SUspect-SdecaY-Hdecay-InTerface) Acta Phys. Polon. B 38 (2007) 635 hep-ph/0609292
132 A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and M. M. Weber Radiative corrections to the semileptonic and hadronic Higgs-boson decays $ H\to WW/ZZ \to $ 4 fermions JHEP 02 (2007) 080 hep-ph/0611234
133 A. Denner et al. Standard model Higgs-boson branching ratios with uncertainties EPJC 71 (2011) 1753 1107.5909
134 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
135 T. Przedzinski, E. Richter-Was, and Z. Was Documentation of TauSpinner algorithms: program for simulating spin effects in $ \tau $-lepton production at LHC EPJC 79 (2019) 91 1802.05459
136 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
137 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
138 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
139 M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and M. Wiesemann Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX EPJC 78 (2018) 537 1711.06631
140 M. Grazzini et al. NNLO QCD + NLO EW with Matrix+OpenLoops: precise predictions for vector-boson pair production JHEP 02 (2020) 087 1912.00068
141 S. Alioli, S.-O. Moch, and P. Uwer Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering JHEP 01 (2012) 137 1110.5251
142 E. Re Single-top $ Wt $-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
143 R. Frederix, E. Re, and P. Torrielli Single-top $ t $-channel hadroproduction in the four-flavour scheme with POWHEG and aMC@NLO JHEP 09 (2012) 130 1207.5391
144 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
145 J. Campbell, T. Neumann, and Z. Sullivan Single-top-quark production in the $ t $-channel at NNLO JHEP 02 (2021) 040 2012.01574
146 N. Kidonakis and N. Yamanaka Higher-order corrections for $ tW $ production at high-energy hadron colliders JHEP 05 (2021) 278 2102.11300
147 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
148 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
149 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
150 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{Z}/\gamma^{*} \to \tau\tau $ cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV and validation of $ \tau $ lepton analysis techniques EPJC 78 (2018) 708 CMS-HIG-15-007
1801.03535
151 CMS Collaboration MET performance in 8 TeV data CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2013
CMS-PAS-JME-12-002
CMS-PAS-JME-12-002
152 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross section for top quark pair production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 2339 CMS-TOP-12-028
1505.04480
153 T. Chen and C. Guestrin XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system in nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016
Proceedings of the 2 (2016) 785
1603.02754
154 T.~Akiba et al. Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework link
155 J. S. Conway Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra in, 2011
PHYSTAT 201 (2011) 115
1103.0354
156 R. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993) 219
157 CMS Collaboration The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 8 (2024) 19 CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
158 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, 2011
159 A. V. Gritsan et al. Snowmass White Paper: Prospects of CP-violation measurements with the Higgs boson at future experiments 2205.07715
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN