CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-HIG-18-015 ; CERN-EP-2019-277
Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying into a top and a bottom quark in the all-jet final state of pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV
JHEP 07 (2020) 126
Abstract: A search for charged Higgs bosons ($\mathrm{H}^\pm$) decaying into a top and a bottom quark in the all-jet final states is presented. The analysis uses LHC proton-proton collision data recorded with the CMS detector in 2016 at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. No significant excess is observed above the expected background. Model-independent upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the product of the $\mathrm{H}^\pm$ production cross section and branching fraction in two scenarios. For production in association with a top quark, limits of 21.3 to 0.007 pb are obtained for $\mathrm{H}^\pm$ masses in the range of 0.2 to 3 TeV. Combining this with data from a search in leptonic final states results in improved limits of 9.25 to 0.005 pb. The complementary $s$-channel production of an $\mathrm{H}^\pm$ is investigated in the mass range of 0.8 to 3 TeV and the corresponding upper limits are 4.5 to 0.023 pb. These results are interpreted using different minimal supersymmetric extensions of the standard model.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The LO diagrams for production of a heavy charged Higgs boson, showing the production with a top and bottom quark (4FS) (left) and via an $s$-channel process (right).

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The LO diagrams for production of a heavy charged Higgs boson, showing the production with a top and bottom quark (4FS) (left) and via an $s$-channel process (right).

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The LO diagrams for production of a heavy charged Higgs boson, showing the production with a top and bottom quark (4FS) (left) and via an $s$-channel process (right).

png pdf
Figure 2:
Data and SM background for the event sample with one t jet as a function of the charged Higgs boson candidate mass. The category t1b is shown and the background normalization is fixed to the SM expectation. The signal mass distributions for associated and $s$-channel production of an ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ with $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 1 TeV normalized with a cross section times branching fraction of 1 pb are superimposed as open histograms. The signal mass window "in'' for associated production is shown together with the sidebands "below'' and "above'' for the mass hypothesis of 1 TeV.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The efficiency of the $ {\mathrm{t} ^\text {res}} $ selection in simulated ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ pairs and the misidentification rate for QCD multijet background, as a function of top quark or top quark candidate ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, respectively (left). The ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution of the leading ${\mathrm{t} ^\text {res}}$ (right) for the signal model and background with normalization fixed to the SM expectation. The dominant background containing misidentified b-jets is primarily composed of QCD multijet processes. The expectation for a signal with $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 0.8 TeV is also shown.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The efficiency of the $ {\mathrm{t} ^\text {res}} $ selection in simulated ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ pairs and the misidentification rate for QCD multijet background, as a function of top quark or top quark candidate ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, respectively (left). The ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution of the leading ${\mathrm{t} ^\text {res}}$ (right) for the signal model and background with normalization fixed to the SM expectation. The dominant background containing misidentified b-jets is primarily composed of QCD multijet processes. The expectation for a signal with $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 0.8 TeV is also shown.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The efficiency of the $ {\mathrm{t} ^\text {res}} $ selection in simulated ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ pairs and the misidentification rate for QCD multijet background, as a function of top quark or top quark candidate ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, respectively (left). The ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution of the leading ${\mathrm{t} ^\text {res}}$ (right) for the signal model and background with normalization fixed to the SM expectation. The dominant background containing misidentified b-jets is primarily composed of QCD multijet processes. The expectation for a signal with $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 0.8 TeV is also shown.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Expected event yields for the boosted analysis in the mass window as defined in Fig. 2 for a ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ with mass 1 TeV in each of the signal categories used with the associated production model. The 11 categories on the left contain low jet multiplicity ($N_{\text {jets}} < $ 3), while categories on the right have high jet multiplicity ($N_{\text {jets}} \ge $ 3). The yields observed in data (black markers) are overlaid. The dashed lines represent the yields for an ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ with a mass of 1 TeV and $\sigma \mathcal {B}=$ 1 pb for associated production. The background distributions result from the global fit described in the text for the background-only hypothesis. Similar categories are fitted for the $s$-channel production.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Variables used in the limit extraction. The ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution for the boosted analysis and for the category t1b, 2b, $N_{\text {jets}} \geq $ 3 (left), for the associated production channels, with the expected signal shown for $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 1 TeV. The invariant mass of the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ candidates for the resolved analysis (right), with the expected signal shown for $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 0.8 TeV. The background distributions result from the background-only fit discussed in the text. The distributions are binned according to the statistical precision of the samples, leading to wider bins in the tail of the distributions.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Variables used in the limit extraction. The ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution for the boosted analysis and for the category t1b, 2b, $N_{\text {jets}} \geq $ 3 (left), for the associated production channels, with the expected signal shown for $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 1 TeV. The invariant mass of the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ candidates for the resolved analysis (right), with the expected signal shown for $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 0.8 TeV. The background distributions result from the background-only fit discussed in the text. The distributions are binned according to the statistical precision of the samples, leading to wider bins in the tail of the distributions.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Variables used in the limit extraction. The ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution for the boosted analysis and for the category t1b, 2b, $N_{\text {jets}} \geq $ 3 (left), for the associated production channels, with the expected signal shown for $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 1 TeV. The invariant mass of the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ candidates for the resolved analysis (right), with the expected signal shown for $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 0.8 TeV. The background distributions result from the background-only fit discussed in the text. The distributions are binned according to the statistical precision of the samples, leading to wider bins in the tail of the distributions.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section times branching fraction as a function of ${m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}}$ for the associated (left) and $s$-channel (right) processes. The observed upper limits are shown by the solid black markers. The median expected limit (dashed line), 68% (inner green band), and 95% (outer yellow band) confidence interval for the expected limits are also shown. For the associated channel limits are calculated from the resolved (boosted) analysis for ${m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}}$ points less (greater) than 0.9 TeV.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section times branching fraction as a function of ${m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}}$ for the associated (left) and $s$-channel (right) processes. The observed upper limits are shown by the solid black markers. The median expected limit (dashed line), 68% (inner green band), and 95% (outer yellow band) confidence interval for the expected limits are also shown. For the associated channel limits are calculated from the resolved (boosted) analysis for ${m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}}$ points less (greater) than 0.9 TeV.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section times branching fraction as a function of ${m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}}$ for the associated (left) and $s$-channel (right) processes. The observed upper limits are shown by the solid black markers. The median expected limit (dashed line), 68% (inner green band), and 95% (outer yellow band) confidence interval for the expected limits are also shown. For the associated channel limits are calculated from the resolved (boosted) analysis for ${m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}}$ points less (greater) than 0.9 TeV.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Excluded parameter space region in the hMSSM scenario (left) and ${M_\mathrm {\mathrm{h}}^\mathrm {125}(\tilde{\chi})}$ (right). The observed upper limits are shown by the solid black markers. The median expected limit (dashed line), 68% (inner green band), and 95% (outer yellow band) confidence interval for the expected limits are also shown. The region below the red line is excluded assuming that the observed neutral Higgs boson is the light CP-even 2HDM Higgs boson with a mass of 125 $\pm$ 3 GeV, where the uncertainty is the theoretical uncertainty in the mass calculation.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Excluded parameter space region in the hMSSM scenario (left) and ${M_\mathrm {\mathrm{h}}^\mathrm {125}(\tilde{\chi})}$ (right). The observed upper limits are shown by the solid black markers. The median expected limit (dashed line), 68% (inner green band), and 95% (outer yellow band) confidence interval for the expected limits are also shown. The region below the red line is excluded assuming that the observed neutral Higgs boson is the light CP-even 2HDM Higgs boson with a mass of 125 $\pm$ 3 GeV, where the uncertainty is the theoretical uncertainty in the mass calculation.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Excluded parameter space region in the hMSSM scenario (left) and ${M_\mathrm {\mathrm{h}}^\mathrm {125}(\tilde{\chi})}$ (right). The observed upper limits are shown by the solid black markers. The median expected limit (dashed line), 68% (inner green band), and 95% (outer yellow band) confidence interval for the expected limits are also shown. The region below the red line is excluded assuming that the observed neutral Higgs boson is the light CP-even 2HDM Higgs boson with a mass of 125 $\pm$ 3 GeV, where the uncertainty is the theoretical uncertainty in the mass calculation.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section times branching fraction as function of ${m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}}$ for the process $ {\sigma _{\mathrm{H} ^\pm \mathrm{t} (\mathrm{b})}} {\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{H} ^\pm \to \mathrm{t} \mathrm{b})}$. The median expected limit (dashed line), 68% (inner green band), and 95% (outer yellow band) confidence interval expected limits are also shown (left). The relative expected contribution of each channel to the overall combination is shown (right). The black solid line corresponds to the combined expected limits while the dashed, dotted and dash-dotted represent the contributing channels.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section times branching fraction as function of ${m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}}$ for the process $ {\sigma _{\mathrm{H} ^\pm \mathrm{t} (\mathrm{b})}} {\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{H} ^\pm \to \mathrm{t} \mathrm{b})}$. The median expected limit (dashed line), 68% (inner green band), and 95% (outer yellow band) confidence interval expected limits are also shown (left). The relative expected contribution of each channel to the overall combination is shown (right). The black solid line corresponds to the combined expected limits while the dashed, dotted and dash-dotted represent the contributing channels.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the cross section times branching fraction as function of ${m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}}$ for the process $ {\sigma _{\mathrm{H} ^\pm \mathrm{t} (\mathrm{b})}} {\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{H} ^\pm \to \mathrm{t} \mathrm{b})}$. The median expected limit (dashed line), 68% (inner green band), and 95% (outer yellow band) confidence interval expected limits are also shown (left). The relative expected contribution of each channel to the overall combination is shown (right). The black solid line corresponds to the combined expected limits while the dashed, dotted and dash-dotted represent the contributing channels.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The systematic uncertainties affecting signal and background for the boosted analysis, evaluated after fitting to data, summed over all final states and categories. The numbers are given in percentage and describe the effect of each nuisance parameter on the overall normalization of each event category. Nuisance parameters with a check mark also affect the shape of the ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ spectrum. Sources that do not apply in a given process are marked with dashes. For the $\mathrm{H} ^{\pm}$ signal, the values for $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 1 TeV and for associated production are shown.

png pdf
Table 2:
The systematic uncertainties in the backgrounds and the signal for the resolved analysis, evaluated after fitting to data, summed over all final states and categories. The numbers are given in percentage and describe the effect of each nuisance parameter on the overall normalization of each event category. Nuisance parameters with a check mark also affect the shape of the $\mathrm{H} ^{\pm}$ candidate mass spectrum. Sources that do not apply in a given process are marked with dashes. For the $\mathrm{H} ^{\pm}$ signal, the values for $ {m_{\mathrm{H} ^\pm}} = $ 0.5 TeV are shown.

png pdf
Table 3:
The numbers of expected and observed events for the resolved analysis after all selections. For background processes, the event yields and their corresponding uncertainties are prior to the background-only fit to the data. For the $\mathrm{H} ^{\pm}$ mass hypotheses of 0.50, 0.65, and 0.80 TeV, the signal yields are normalized to a $\sigma \mathcal {B}=$ 1 pb and the total systematic uncertainties prior to the fit are shown.

png pdf
Table 4:
The upper limit at 95% CL on the $ {\sigma _{\mathrm{H} ^\pm \mathrm{t} (\mathrm{b})}} {\mathcal {B}(\mathrm{H} ^\pm \to \mathrm{t} \mathrm{b})}$ with the combined all-jet, single-lepton, and dilepton final states.
Summary
Results are presented from a search for charged Higgs bosons (${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$) that decay to a top and a bottom quark in the all-jet final state. The search considers two distinct event topologies. The ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ is reconstructed from a b-tagged jet in combination with a top quark candidate, either resolved as two jets from $\mathrm{q\bar{q}'}$ decays of a W boson and an additional b-tagged jet, or, for highly boosted decay products, reconstructed as a single top-flavored jet or a W jet paired with an additional b-tagged jet. The analysis uses data collected with the CMS detector in 2016 at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. No significant deviation is observed above the expected standard model background. Model-independent upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the product of the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ production cross section and branching fraction. For production in association with a top quark, limits of 21.3 to 0.007 pb are set for ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ masses in the range 0.2 to 3 TeV. Combining these results with data from a search in leptonic final states of W bosons sets improved limits of 9.25 to 0.005 pb. The complementary $s$-channel production of an ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}$ is investigated in the mass range 0.8 to 3 TeV and the corresponding upper limits are set at 4.5 to 0.023 pb. Exclusion regions are also presented in the parameter space of the minimal supersymmetric standard model hMSSM and ${M_\mathrm{\mathrm{h}}^\mathrm{125}(\tilde{\chi})}$ benchmark scenarios.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
2 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
3 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
4 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments PRL 114 (2015) 191803 1503.07589
5 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2017) 047 CMS-HIG-16-041
1706.09936
6 CMS Collaboration Constraints on the spin-parity and anomalous HVV couplings of the Higgs boson in proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV PRD 92 (2015) 012004 CMS-HIG-14-018
1411.3441
7 ATLAS Collaboration Study of the spin and parity of the Higgs boson in diboson decays with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 476 1506.05669
8 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2016) 045 1606.02266
9 J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber The CP conserving two Higgs doublet model: the approach to the decoupling limit PRD 67 (2003) 075019 hep-ph/0207010
10 A. G. Akeroyd et al. Prospects for charged Higgs searches at the LHC EPJC 77 (2017) 276 1607.01320
11 G. C. Branco et al. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models PR 516 (2012) 1 1106.0034
12 N. Craig and S. Thomas Exclusive signals of an extended Higgs sector JHEP 11 (2012) 083 1207.4835
13 A. Djouadi The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II: the Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model PR 459 (2008) 1 hep-ph/0503173
14 M. Carena et al. MSSM Higgs boson searches at the LHC: benchmark scenarios after the discovery of a Higgs-like particle EPJC 73 (2013) 2552 1302.7033
15 M. Carena, I. Low, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner Impersonating the standard model Higgs boson: alignment without decoupling JHEP 04 (2014) 015 1310.2248
16 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector CERN (2016) 1610.07922
17 R. Harlander, M. Kramer, and M. Schumacher Bottom-quark associated Higgs-boson production: reconciling the four- and five-flavour scheme approach 1112.3478
18 CMS Collaboration Search for a charged Higgs boson in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 11 (2015) 018 CMS-HIG-14-023
1508.07774
19 ATLAS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons in the $ H^{\pm} \rightarrow tb $ decay channel in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector JHEP 03 (2016) 127 1512.03704
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying into top and bottom quarks at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 11 (2018) 085 1808.03599
21 CMS Collaboration Search for a charged Higgs boson decaying into top and bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in events with electrons or muons Acc. by JHEP CMS-HIG-18-004
1908.09206
22 CMS Collaboration Search for a light charged Higgs boson decaying to $ \mathrm{c}\overline{\mathrm{s}} $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 12 (2015) 178 CMS-HIG-13-035
1510.04252
23 CMS Collaboration Search for a charged Higgs boson decaying to charm and bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 11 (2018) 115 CMS-HIG-16-030
1808.06575
24 ATLAS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying via $ H^{\pm} \rightarrow \tau^{\pm}\nu $ in fully hadronic final states using $ pp $ collision data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 03 (2015) 088 1412.6663
25 ATLAS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying via $ H^{\pm} \to \tau^{\pm}\nu_{\tau} $ in the $ \tau $+jets and $ \tau $+lepton final states with 36 fb$ ^{-1} $ of $ pp $ collision data recorded at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment JHEP 09 (2018) 139 1807.07915
26 CMS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons in the H$ ^{\pm} \to \tau^{\pm}\nu_\tau $ decay channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2019) 142 CMS-HIG-18-014
1903.04560
27 BaBar and Belle Collaboration The physics of the B factories EPJC 74 (2014) 3026 1406.6311
28 Belle-II Collaboration The Belle II physics book 1808.10567
29 CMS Collaboration Search for beyond the standard model Higgs bosons decaying into a $ \mathrm{b\overline{b}} $ pair in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 08 (2018) 113 CMS-HIG-16-018
1805.12191
30 CMS Collaboration Search for additional neutral MSSM Higgs bosons in the $ \tau\tau $ final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 09 (2018) 007 CMS-HIG-17-020
1803.06553
31 ATLAS Collaboration Search for additional heavy neutral Higgs and gauge bosons in the ditau final state produced in 36 fb$ ^{-1} $ of pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 01 (2018) 055 1709.07242
32 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy Higgs bosons A/H decaying to a top quark pair in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 119 (2017) 191803 1707.06025
33 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with two leptons of same sign, missing transverse momentum, and jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 77 (2017) 578 CMS-SUS-16-035
1704.07323
34 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying to a top quark pair in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Sub. to JHEP CMS-HIG-17-027
1908.01115
35 H. Georgi and M. Machacek Doubly charged Higgs bosons NPB 262 (1985) 463
36 CMS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons produced via vector boson fusion and decaying into a pair of W and Z bosons using pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 119 (2017) 141802 CMS-HIG-16-027
1705.02942
37 CMS Collaboration Observation of electroweak production of same-sign W boson pairs in the two jet and two same-sign lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 120 (2018) 081801 CMS-SMP-17-004
1709.05822
38 E. Malkawi, T. M. P. Tait, and C. P. Yuan A model of strong flavor dynamics for the top quark PLB 385 (1996) 304 hep-ph/9603349
39 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy resonances decaying to a top quark and a bottom quark in the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV PLB 777 (2018) 39 CMS-B2G-17-010
1708.08539
40 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
41 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
42 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
43 CompHEP Collaboration Comphep 4.4: Automatic computations from lagrangians to events NIMA 534 (2004) 250 hep-ph/0403113
44 S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein Feynhiggs: a program for the calculation of the masses of the neutral CP even Higgs bosons in the MSSM CPC 124 (2000) 76 hep-ph/9812320
45 E. L. Berger, T. Han, J. Jiang, and T. Plehn Associated production of a top quark and a charged Higgs boson PRD 71 (2005) 115012 hep-ph/0312286
46 M. Flechl et al. Improved cross-section predictions for heavy charged Higgs boson production at the LHC PRD 91 (2015) 075015 1409.5615
47 C. Degrande, M. Ubiali, M. Wiesemann, and M. Zaro Heavy charged Higgs boson production at the LHC JHEP 10 (2015) 145 1507.02549
48 S. Dittmaier, M. Kramer, M. Spira, and M. Walser Charged Higgs boson production at the LHC: NLO supersymmetric QCD corrections PRD 83 (2011) 055005 0906.2648
49 A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, and M. Spira HDECAY: a program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension CPC 108 (1998) 56 hep-ph/9704448
50 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
51 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
52 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
53 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
54 R. Frederix, E. Re, and P. Torrielli Single-top $ t $-channel hadroproduction in the four-flavour scheme with POWHEG and aMC@NLO JHEP 09 (2012) 130 1207.5391
55 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
56 E. Re Single-top W$ t $-channel production matched with parton showers using the powheg method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
57 H. B. Hartanto, B. Jager, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX PRD 91 (2015) 094003 1501.04498
58 N. Kidonakis Differential and total cross sections for top pair and single top production in Proceedings, 20th International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects (DIS 2012): Bonn, Germany, March 26-30, 2012, p. 831 2012 1205.3453
59 M. Cacciari et al. Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation PLB 710 (2012) 612 1111.5869
60 P. Barnreuther, M. Czakon, and A. Mitov Percent level precision physics at the tevatron: First genuine NNLO QCD corrections to $ q \bar{q} \to t \bar{t} + x $ PRL 109 (2012) 132001 1204.5201
61 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels JHEP 12 (2012) 054 1207.0236
62 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction JHEP 01 (2013) 080 1210.6832
63 M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein, and C. Schwinn Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation NPB 855 (2012) 695 1109.1536
64 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders through $ {O}(\frac{4}{S}) $ PRL 110 (2013) 252004 1303.6254
65 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
66 M. Aliev et al. HATHOR: Hadronic top and heavy quarks cross section calculator CPC 182 (2011) 1034 1007.1327
67 P. Kant et al. HATHOR for single top-quark production: Updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions CPC 191 (2015) 74 1406.4403
68 F. Maltoni, D. Pagani, and I. Tsinikos Associated production of a top-quark pair with vector bosons at NLO in QCD: impact on $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{H} $ searches at the LHC JHEP 02 (2016) 113 1507.05640
69 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
70 N. Kidonakis Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W$ ^- $ or H$ ^- $ PRD 82 (2010) 054018 1005.4451
71 NNPDF Collaboration Unbiased global determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties at NNLO and at LO NPB 855 (2012) 153 1107.2652
72 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
73 CMS Collaboration Study of the underlying event in top quark pair production in $ \mathrm {p}\mathrm {p} $ collisions at 13 $ \text {Te}\text {V} $ EPJC 79 (2019) 123 CMS-TOP-17-015
1807.02810
74 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
75 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
76 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
77 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
78 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
79 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
80 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
81 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
82 CMS Collaboration Reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ lepton decays to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ at CMS JINST 11 (2016) P01019 CMS-TAU-14-001
1510.07488
83 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
84 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
85 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data CMS-PAS-JME-18-001 CMS-PAS-JME-18-001
86 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
87 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
88 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
89 D. Krohn, J. Thaler, and L.-T. Wang Jet trimming JHEP 02 (2010) 084 0912.1342
90 A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler Soft drop JHEP 05 (2014) 146 1402.2657
91 J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg Identifying boosted objects with $ {N} $-subjettiness JHEP 03 (2011) 015 1011.2268
92 A. Hocker et al. TMVA --- toolkit for multivariate data analysis PoS ACAT (2007) 040 physics/0703039
93 CMS Collaboration Performance of quark/gluon discrimination in 8 TeV pp data CMS-PAS-JME-13-002 CMS-PAS-JME-13-002
94 CMS Collaboration Identification of c-quark jets at the CMS experiment CMS-PAS-BTV-16-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-16-001
95 CMS Collaboration Search for direct production of supersymmetric partners of the top quark in the all-jets final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 10 (2017) 005 CMS-SUS-16-049
1707.03316
96 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PRL 117 (2016) 182002 1606.02625
97 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
98 CMS Collaboration Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data CMS-PAS-JME-16-003 CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
99 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
100 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples CPC 77 (1993) 219
101 J. S. Conway Incorporating Nuisance Parameters in Likelihoods for Multisource Spectra in Proceedings, PHYSTAT 2011 Workshop on Statistical Issues Related to Discovery Claims in Search Experiments and Unfolding, CERN,Geneva, Switzerland 17-20 January 2011, p. 115 2011 1103.0354
102 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
103 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the CLs technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
104 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
105 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
106 A. Djouadi and J. Quevillon The MSSM Higgs sector at a high $ M_{SUSY} $: reopening the low tan$ \beta $ regime and heavy Higgs searches JHEP 10 (2013) 028 1304.1787
107 L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer Bounds to the Higgs Sector Masses in Minimal Supersymmetry from LHC Data PLB 724 (2013) 274 1305.2172
108 A. Djouadi et al. The post-Higgs MSSM scenario: Habemus MSSM? EPJC 73 (2013) 2650 1307.5205
109 A. Djouadi et al. Fully covering the MSSM Higgs sector at the LHC JHEP 06 (2015) 168 1502.05653
110 E. Bagnaschi et al. MSSM Higgs Boson Searches at the LHC: Benchmark Scenarios for Run 2 and Beyond EPJC 79 (2019) 617 1808.07542
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN