Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js
CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SMP-24-001 ; CERN-EP-2024-129
Measurement of inclusive and differential cross sections for W+W production in proton-proton collisions at s= 13.6 TeV
Phys. Lett. B 861 (2025) 139231
Abstract: Measurements at s= 13.6 TeV of the opposite-sign W boson pair production cross section in proton-proton collisions are presented. The data used in this study were collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC in 2022, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 34.8 fb1. Events are selected by requiring one electron and one muon of opposite charge. A maximum likelihood fit is performed on signal- and background-enriched data categories defined by the flavour and charge of the leptons, the number of jets, and number of jets originating from b quarks. An inclusive W+W production cross section of 125.7 ± 5.6 pb is measured, in agreement with standard model predictions. Cross sections are also reported in a fiducial region close to that of the detector acceptance, both inclusively and differentially, as a function of the jet multiplicity in the event. For first time in proton-proton collisions, WW events with at least two reconstructed jets are studied and compared with recent theoretical predictions.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Figures & Tables References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Distributions of the number of reconstructed jets after the fit to the data in the WW SR (upper left), same-sign CR (upper right), Zττ CR (center left), one b tag CR (center right), and two b tags CR (lower left), and the number of events in the WZ3ν and ZZ4 CRs (lower right). The histograms for tVx backgrounds include the contributions from t¯tV(V) processes. The histograms for Vγ backgrounds include the contributions from Wγ and Zγ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The grey bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Distributions of the number of reconstructed jets after the fit to the data in the WW SR (upper left), same-sign CR (upper right), Zττ CR (center left), one b tag CR (center right), and two b tags CR (lower left), and the number of events in the WZ3ν and ZZ4 CRs (lower right). The histograms for tVx backgrounds include the contributions from t¯tV(V) processes. The histograms for Vγ backgrounds include the contributions from Wγ and Zγ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The grey bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Distributions of the number of reconstructed jets after the fit to the data in the WW SR (upper left), same-sign CR (upper right), Zττ CR (center left), one b tag CR (center right), and two b tags CR (lower left), and the number of events in the WZ3ν and ZZ4 CRs (lower right). The histograms for tVx backgrounds include the contributions from t¯tV(V) processes. The histograms for Vγ backgrounds include the contributions from Wγ and Zγ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The grey bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Distributions of the number of reconstructed jets after the fit to the data in the WW SR (upper left), same-sign CR (upper right), Zττ CR (center left), one b tag CR (center right), and two b tags CR (lower left), and the number of events in the WZ3ν and ZZ4 CRs (lower right). The histograms for tVx backgrounds include the contributions from t¯tV(V) processes. The histograms for Vγ backgrounds include the contributions from Wγ and Zγ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The grey bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Distributions of the number of reconstructed jets after the fit to the data in the WW SR (upper left), same-sign CR (upper right), Zττ CR (center left), one b tag CR (center right), and two b tags CR (lower left), and the number of events in the WZ3ν and ZZ4 CRs (lower right). The histograms for tVx backgrounds include the contributions from t¯tV(V) processes. The histograms for Vγ backgrounds include the contributions from Wγ and Zγ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The grey bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data.

png pdf
Figure 1-e:
Distributions of the number of reconstructed jets after the fit to the data in the WW SR (upper left), same-sign CR (upper right), Zττ CR (center left), one b tag CR (center right), and two b tags CR (lower left), and the number of events in the WZ3ν and ZZ4 CRs (lower right). The histograms for tVx backgrounds include the contributions from t¯tV(V) processes. The histograms for Vγ backgrounds include the contributions from Wγ and Zγ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The grey bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data.

png pdf
Figure 1-f:
Distributions of the number of reconstructed jets after the fit to the data in the WW SR (upper left), same-sign CR (upper right), Zττ CR (center left), one b tag CR (center right), and two b tags CR (lower left), and the number of events in the WZ3ν and ZZ4 CRs (lower right). The histograms for tVx backgrounds include the contributions from t¯tV(V) processes. The histograms for Vγ backgrounds include the contributions from Wγ and Zγ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The grey bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Results obtained in this analysis and other WW production cross section measurements at different center-of-mass energies for the CMS [6,7,11], ATLAS [5,8,71], CDF [4], and D0 [3] Collaborations are presented, and compared with the NNLO QCD × NLO EW and NLO predictions from MATRIX. The vertical error bars represent the uncertainty in the measured cross section.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The upper panel shows the normalized cross section measurement for events with Nj= 0, 1, 2 jets. The filled circles represent the unfolded data results. The black, blue, and red lines represent the predictions from POWHEG +PYTHIA, MATRIX, and POWHEG MINNLO+PYTHIA, respectively. The lower panels show the ratio of the theoretical predictions to the measurement. In all panels, the error bars on the data points represent the total uncertainty in the measurement, and the shaded band depicts the uncertainty in the prediction.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the requirements defining the WW SR and dilepton CRs.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the requirements defining the WZ and ZZ CRs.

png pdf
Table 3:
Systematic uncertainties on μ, the measured inclusive cross section divided by the predicted cross section. Lepton experimental uncertainties encompass the effects of calibration of lepton momentum scale and resolution, as well as lepton trigger, reconstruction, identification, and isolation efficiencies. Jet experimental uncertainties encompass the effects of the jet energy scale and resolution. The limited sample size category is related to the finite number of MC events and data events used for data-driven background estimates.

png pdf
Table 4:
Definition of the fiducial region.

png pdf
Table 5:
Data, signal, and background yields combining all reconstructed jet multiplicity bins. The combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties is shown. The expected yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit to data.

png pdf
Table 6:
Data, signal and background yields in events in the WZ and ZZ CRs. The combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties is shown. The expected yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit to data.

png pdf
Table 7:
Inclusive fiducial cross section and normalized cross sections for events with Nj= 0, 1, 2 jets. The uncertainty listed is the total uncertainty obtained from the fit to the yields. The expected predictions are obtained from POWHEG +PYTHIA. In parentheses, the split of systematic and statistical uncertainties are reported.
Summary
First measurements at s= 13.6 TeV of the WW production cross section in proton-proton collisions have been presented. The data used in this study were collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC in 2022, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 34.8 fb1. Events were selected by requiring one electron and one muon of opposite charge. A maximum likelihood fit has been performed in event signal- and background-enriched categories defined by the flavour and charge of the leptons, the number of jets, and number of jets identified as originating from b quarks. An inclusive WW production cross section of 125.7 ± 2.3 (stat) ± 4.8 (syst) ± 1.8 (lumi) pb = 125.7 ± 5.6 pb is measured, in agreement with the standard model prediction. The overall sensitivity is about 25% better than previous CMS measurements at s= 13 TeV with a similar integrated luminosity, because of several reduced experimental uncertainties and the improved fit strategy. Cross sections have also been reported in a fiducial region close to that of the detector acceptance, both inclusively and differentially, as a function of the jet multiplicity in the event. For first time in proton-proton collisions, WW events with at least two reconstructed jets are studied and compared with the most precise theoretical predictions.
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 1-a:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 1-b:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 1-c:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 1-d:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 0-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2-a:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 0-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2-b:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 0-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2-c:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 0-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2-d:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 0-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 1-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3-a:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 1-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3-b:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 1-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3-c:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 1-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3-d:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 1-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 4:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 2-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 4-a:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 2-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 4-b:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 2-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 4-c:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 2-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.

png pdf
Additional Figure 4-d:
Distributions of the m (upper left), pT (upper right), p maxT (lower left), and p minT (lower right) variables in the 2-jet WW SR. The error bars represent the uncertainties associated with statistical and systematic uncertainties before the fit to data.
Additional Tables

png pdf
Additional Table 1:
Correlation matrix among the inclusive fiducial cross sections and the jet bin fractions measured in the analysis.

png pdf
Additional Table 2:
Relative fractions at the reconstruction level for each generator-level jet bin.

png pdf
Additional Table 3:
Fiducial cross sections as a function of the jet bin obtained in the analysis. The uncertainty listed is the total uncertainty obtained from the fit to the yields.
References
1 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics in events with two soft oppositely charged leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s= 13 TeV PLB 782 (2018) 440 CMS-SUS-16-048
1801.01846
2 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the WW production cross section with dilepton final states in pˉp collisions at s= 1.96 TeV and limits on anomalous trilinear gauge couplings PRL 103 (2009) 191801 0904.0673
3 D0 Collaboration Search for Higgs boson production in oppositely charged dilepton and missing energy final states in 9.7 fb1 of pˉp collisions at s= 1.96 TeV PRD 88 (2013) 052006 1301.1243
4 CDF Collaboration Measurement of the W+W production cross section and search for anomalous WWγ and WWZ couplings in pˉp collisions at s= 1.96 TeV PRL 104 (2010) 201801 0912.4500
5 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of W+W production in pp collisions at s= 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous WWZ and WWγ couplings PRD 87 (2013) 112001 1210.2979
6 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the W+W cross section in pp collisions at s= 7 TeV and limits on anomalous WWγ and WWZ couplings EPJC 73 (2013) 2610 CMS-SMP-12-005
1306.1126
7 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the W+W cross section in pp collisions at s= 8 TeV and limits on anomalous gauge couplings EPJC 76 (2016) 401 CMS-SMP-14-016
1507.03268
8 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of total and differential W+W production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous triple-gauge-boson couplings JHEP 09 (2016) 029 1603.01702
9 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of W+W production in association with one jet in proton--proton collisions at s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 763 (2016) 114 1608.03086
10 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of fiducial and differential W+W production cross sections at s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 79 (2019) 884 1905.04242
11 CMS Collaboration W+W boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at s= 13 TeV PRD 102 (2020) 092001 CMS-SMP-18-004
2009.00119
12 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of W+W + 1-jet production cross-sections in pp collisions at s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2021) 003 2103.10319
13 M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and M. Wiesemann Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX EPJC 78 (2018) 537 1711.06631
14 M. Grazzini et al. NNLO QCD + NLO EW with Matrix+OpenLoops: precise predictions for vector-boson pair production JHEP 02 (2020) 087 1912.00068
15 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
16 F. Caola, K. Melnikov, R. Röntsch, and L. Tancredi QCD corrections to W+W production through gluon fusion PLB 754 (2016) 275 1511.08617
17 CMS Collaboration The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine Submitted to Comput. Softw. Big Sci, 2024 CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
18 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
19 CMS Collaboration Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3 JINST 19 (2024) P05064 CMS-PRF-21-001
2309.05466
20 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at s= 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
21 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
22 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
23 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
24 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
25 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi W+W, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2 EPJC 74 (2014) 2702 1311.1365
26 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 07 (2008) 060 0805.4802
27 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 04 (2009) 002 0812.0578
28 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
29 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
30 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
31 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
32 I. Anderson et al. Constraining anomalous HVV interactions at proton and lepton colliders PRD 89 (2014) 035007 1309.4819
33 A. V. Gritsan et al. New features in the JHU generator framework: constraining Higgs boson properties from on-shell and off-shell production PRD 102 (2020) 056022 2002.09888
34 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
35 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
36 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
37 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
38 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
39 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
40 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
41 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
42 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at s= 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
43 CMS Collaboration Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2017
CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
44 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
45 D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran Pileup per particle identification JHEP 10 (2014) 059 1407.6013
46 E. Bols et al. Jet flavour classification using DeepJet JINST 15 (2020) P12012 2008.10519
47 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
48 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at s= 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
49 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying to a W boson pair in pp collisions at s= 13 TeV PLB 791 (2019) 96 CMS-HIG-16-042
1806.05246
50 Particle Data Group , R. L. Workman et al. Review of Particle Physics PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01
51 CMS Collaboration First measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in proton-proton collisions at s= 13.6 TeV JHEP 08 (2023) 204 CMS-TOP-22-012
2303.10680
52 CMS Collaboration Measurement of Higgs boson production and properties in the WW decay channel with leptonic final states JHEP 01 (2014) 096 CMS-HIG-13-023
1312.1129
53 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
54 CMS Collaboration Luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at 13.6 TeV in 2022 at CMS CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2024
CMS-PAS-LUM-22-001
CMS-PAS-LUM-22-001
55 CMS Collaboration Measurements of differential Z boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at s= 13 TeV JHEP 12 (2019) 061 CMS-SMP-17-010
1909.04133
56 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
57 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
58 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993) 219
59 CMS Collaboration Object definitions for top quark analyses at the particle level Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2017-004, 2017
CDS
60 CMS Collaboration Measurements of production cross sections of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at s= 13 TeV PLB 809 (2020) 135710 CMS-SMP-19-012
2005.01173
61 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Z boson differential production cross section using its invisible decay mode (Zνˉν) in proton-proton collisions at s= 13 TeV JHEP 05 (2021) 205 CMS-SMP-18-003
2012.09254
62 S. Schmitt TUnfold: an algorithm for correcting migration effects in high energy physics JINST 7 (2012) T10003 1205.6201
63 CMSnoop Statistical data analysis \hrefG.~Cowan, , ch.~11, . Oxford University Press, 1998
64 R. D. Cousins Lectures on statistics in theory: Prelude to statistics in practice 1807.05996
65 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the tˉt cross section and its ratio to the Z production cross section using pp collisions at s= 13.6 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 848 (2024) 138376 2308.09529
66 S. Kallweit, M. Grazzini, and M. Wiesemann Higher-order corrections on diboson production processes with MATRIX PoS RADCOR 075, 2018
link
67 P. F. Monni et al. MiNNLOPS: a new method to match NNLO QCD to parton showers JHEP 05 (2020) 143 1908.06987
68 P. F. Monni, E. Re, and M. Wiesemann MiNNLOPS: optimizing 2 1 hadronic processes EPJC 80 (2020) 1075 2006.04133
69 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis 2024
link
70 CMS Collaboration Statistical model for this analysis link
71 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the W+W production cross section in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment PLB 773 (2017) 354 1702.04519
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN