CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-24-008 ; CERN-EP-2025-241
Search for low-mass hidden-valley dark showers with non-prompt muon pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
Submitted to J. High Energy Phys.
Abstract: A search for signatures of a dark analog to quantum chromodynamics is performed. The analysis targets long-lived dark mesons that decay into standard-model particles, with a high branching fraction of the dark mesons decaying into muons. The dark mesons are formed by the hadronisation of dark partons, which are produced by a decay of the Higgs boson. The search is performed using a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 41.6 fb$ ^{-1} $, which was collected in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC in 2018 using non-prompt muon triggers. The search is based on resonant muon pair signatures. Machine-learning techniques are employed in the analysis, utilising boosted decision trees to discriminate between signal and background. No significant excess is observed above the standard model expectation. Upper limits on the branching fraction of the Higgs boson decaying to dark partons are determined to be as low as $ 10^{-4} $ at 95% confidence level, surpassing and extending the existing limits on models with dark $ \tilde{\omega} $ mesons for mean proper decay lengths of less than 500 mm and for $ \tilde{\omega} $ masses down to 0.3 GeV. First limits are set for extended dark-shower models with two dark flavours that contain dark photons, probing their masses down to 0.33 GeV.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Diagram for the vector portal model. An SM Higgs boson decays to dark partons $ \psi\bar{\psi} $, which then hadronise to form dark hadrons including dark vector mesons $ \tilde{\omega} $ and dark pseudoscalar mesons $ \tilde{\eta} $. The $ \tilde{\omega} $ then undergoes displaced decay into SM fermions $ f\bar{f} $.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Diagrams for the Scenario A model (left) and the Scenario B1 model (right). In these extended models the dark hadronisation produces a spectrum of dark mesons, including the dark pions $ \tilde{\pi}_{1} $, $ \tilde{\pi}_{2} $ and $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $. The $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ then decays into SM fermions $ f\bar{f} $ through the dark photon $ \mathrm{A}' $. Green is used to indicate a long-lived particle. The $ \mathrm{A}' $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario A, while $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario B1.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Diagrams for the Scenario A model (left) and the Scenario B1 model (right). In these extended models the dark hadronisation produces a spectrum of dark mesons, including the dark pions $ \tilde{\pi}_{1} $, $ \tilde{\pi}_{2} $ and $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $. The $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ then decays into SM fermions $ f\bar{f} $ through the dark photon $ \mathrm{A}' $. Green is used to indicate a long-lived particle. The $ \mathrm{A}' $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario A, while $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario B1.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Diagrams for the Scenario A model (left) and the Scenario B1 model (right). In these extended models the dark hadronisation produces a spectrum of dark mesons, including the dark pions $ \tilde{\pi}_{1} $, $ \tilde{\pi}_{2} $ and $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $. The $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ then decays into SM fermions $ f\bar{f} $ through the dark photon $ \mathrm{A}' $. Green is used to indicate a long-lived particle. The $ \mathrm{A}' $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario A, while $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ is a long-lived particle in Scenario B1.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of examples of variables that are used in the BDT training for the QCD background and benchmark signal models: muon multiplicity (upper) and muon transverse impact parameter (lower).

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distributions of examples of variables that are used in the BDT training for the QCD background and benchmark signal models: muon multiplicity (upper) and muon transverse impact parameter (lower).

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distributions of examples of variables that are used in the BDT training for the QCD background and benchmark signal models: muon multiplicity (upper) and muon transverse impact parameter (lower).

png pdf
Figure 4:
Distributions of the multiplicity of dark vector mesons $ \tilde{\omega} $ for representative vector portal models (upper), and the multiplicity of dark mesons $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ for representative Scenario A and B1 models (lower).

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Distributions of the multiplicity of dark vector mesons $ \tilde{\omega} $ for representative vector portal models (upper), and the multiplicity of dark mesons $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ for representative Scenario A and B1 models (lower).

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Distributions of the multiplicity of dark vector mesons $ \tilde{\omega} $ for representative vector portal models (upper), and the multiplicity of dark mesons $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ for representative Scenario A and B1 models (lower).

png pdf
Figure 5:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each single-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each single-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each single-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each single-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each single-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 5-e:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each single-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 5-f:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each single-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each multi-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each multi-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each multi-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each multi-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each multi-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 6-e:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each multi-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 6-f:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions for each multi-vertex category for data and two vector portal model signal benchmarks. The shaded regions indicate mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search. A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions in mass windows around 0.67 GeV (upper) and 1.33 GeV (lower), in the single-vertex category with 1 $ \text{cm} < l_{xy} < 10 $ cm and $ \text{pointing angle} < $ 0.2. The background fit is shown together with the signal expected for a representative Scenario A model (upper) and a representative Scenario B1 model (lower). A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals. The lower panel in each plot shows the pull distribution, defined as the difference between the data and the background fit in each bin divided by the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions in mass windows around 0.67 GeV (upper) and 1.33 GeV (lower), in the single-vertex category with 1 $ \text{cm} < l_{xy} < 10 $ cm and $ \text{pointing angle} < $ 0.2. The background fit is shown together with the signal expected for a representative Scenario A model (upper) and a representative Scenario B1 model (lower). A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals. The lower panel in each plot shows the pull distribution, defined as the difference between the data and the background fit in each bin divided by the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Dimuon invariant mass distributions in mass windows around 0.67 GeV (upper) and 1.33 GeV (lower), in the single-vertex category with 1 $ \text{cm} < l_{xy} < 10 $ cm and $ \text{pointing angle} < $ 0.2. The background fit is shown together with the signal expected for a representative Scenario A model (upper) and a representative Scenario B1 model (lower). A branching fraction of 0.01 is assumed for the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons for illustrating the signals. The lower panel in each plot shows the pull distribution, defined as the difference between the data and the background fit in each bin divided by the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\omega} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\omega} $ mass hypotheses and branching fractions for decaying into a muon pair in the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $, and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are parameters of the dark sector: the mass of the spin-one meson, confinement scale, and the mass of the spin-zero meson, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\omega} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\omega} $ mass hypotheses and branching fractions for decaying into a muon pair in the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $, and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are parameters of the dark sector: the mass of the spin-one meson, confinement scale, and the mass of the spin-zero meson, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\omega} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\omega} $ mass hypotheses and branching fractions for decaying into a muon pair in the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $, and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are parameters of the dark sector: the mass of the spin-one meson, confinement scale, and the mass of the spin-zero meson, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\omega} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\omega} $ mass hypotheses and branching fractions for decaying into a muon pair in the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $, and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are parameters of the dark sector: the mass of the spin-one meson, confinement scale, and the mass of the spin-zero meson, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 8-d:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\omega} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\omega} $ mass hypotheses and branching fractions for decaying into a muon pair in the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $, and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are parameters of the dark sector: the mass of the spin-one meson, confinement scale, and the mass of the spin-zero meson, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario A. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario A. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario A. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 9-c:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario A. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 9-d:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario A. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario B1. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario B1. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario B1. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 10-c:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario B1. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 10-d:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ meson $ c\tau $ for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass hypotheses, and branching fractions of the dark photon decaying into a muon pair in Scenario B1. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1.

png pdf
Figure 11:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\omega} $ meson mass for representative $ c\tau $ hypotheses in the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $, and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are parameters of the dark sector: the mass of the spin-one meson, confinement scale, and the mass of the spin-zero meson, respectively. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\omega} $ meson mass for representative $ c\tau $ hypotheses in the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $, and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are parameters of the dark sector: the mass of the spin-one meson, confinement scale, and the mass of the spin-zero meson, respectively. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \tilde{\omega} $ meson mass for representative $ c\tau $ hypotheses in the vector portal model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $, and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are parameters of the dark sector: the mass of the spin-one meson, confinement scale, and the mass of the spin-zero meson, respectively. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 12:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario A, for representative $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 12-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario A, for representative $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 12-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario A, for representative $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 12-c:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario A, for representative $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 12-d:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario A, for representative $ \mathrm{A}' c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 13:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario B1, for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 13-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario B1, for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 13-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario B1, for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 13-c:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario B1, for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 13-d:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass in Scenario B1, for representative $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} c\tau $ hypotheses, and different ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left column) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right column), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 14:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as a function of the $ \tilde{\omega} $ meson mass and $ c\tau $ in the vector portal model. The parameter space region that is omitted is kinematically forbidden in the model. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\omega}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=m_{\tilde{\eta}} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\omega}} $, $ \tilde{\Lambda} $, and $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ are parameters of the dark sector: the mass of the spin-one meson, confinement scale, and the mass of the spin-zero meson, respectively. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 15:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass and $ c\tau $ for representative ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses in Scenario A. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 15-a:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass and $ c\tau $ for representative ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses in Scenario A. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 15-b:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass and $ c\tau $ for representative ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses in Scenario A. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark-sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be 1. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 16:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass and the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} c\tau $ for representative ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses in Scenario B1. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be one. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 16-a:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass and the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} c\tau $ for representative ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses in Scenario B1. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be one. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.

png pdf
Figure 16-b:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\psi\overline{\psi}) $ as functions of the $ \mathrm{A}' $ mass and the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} c\tau $ for representative ratios of the $ \tilde{\pi}_{3} $ and $ \mathrm{A}' $ masses in Scenario B1. The limits are shown for the cases where $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=10m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (left) and $ m_{\tilde{\pi}_{3}}=3m_{\mathrm{A}'} $ (right), respectively. It is assumed that $ m_{\tilde{\eta}}=\tilde{\Lambda}=4m_{\tilde{\pi}_{2}} $ and $ {\sin\theta=0.1} $, where $ m_{\tilde{\eta}} $ is the mass of the dark sector pseudoscalar meson and $ \theta $ is the mixing angle parametrising the isospin violation. The branching fraction $ \mathcal{B}(\tilde{\pi}_{3}\to \mathrm{A}'\mathrm{A}') $ is assumed to be one. The grey bands correspond to mass regions of known SM resonances, which are masked in the search.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Model parameters of the different classes of signal models interpreted by the analysis.

png pdf
Table 2:
The SM resonances and the corresponding mass windows that are masked in the analysis.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties in the signal yield expectation.
Summary
A search for dark showers has been performed with non-prompt muon pairs, using proton-proton collisions at the CERN LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, collected by the CMS experiment in 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 41.6 fb$ ^{-1} $. The data set is recorded using the data parking strategy, resulting in a sample of about $ 10^{10} $ recorded events, giving access to masses down to the sub-GeV scale. No significant excess beyond the standard model expectation is observed. Upper limits on the branching fraction of the Higgs boson decaying into dark partons are set as low as $ 10^{-4} $ at 95% confidence level, providing the most stringent limits to date on the vector portal model with dark $ \tilde{\omega} $ mesons of mean proper decay length below 500 mm and masses between 0.3 and 20 GeV. For the first time, limits have been set for extended dark-shower models with two dark flavours (Scenario A and Scenario B1) that contain dark photons, probing their masses down to 0.33 GeV.
References
1 V. C. Rubin, N. Thonnard, and W. K. Ford, Jr. Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R = 4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R = 122 kpc) Astrophys. J. 238 (1980) 471
2 M. Markevitch et al. Direct constraints on the dark matter self-interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56 Astrophys. J. 606 (2004) 819 astro-ph/0309303
3 Planck Collaboration Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 1807.06209
4 A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi Dark matter and the early universe: a review Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 119 (2021) 103865 2104.11488
5 M. Persic, P. Salucci, and F. Stel The universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies: 1. The dark matter connection Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 281 (1996) 27 astro-ph/9506004
6 M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders PLB 651 (2007) 374 hep-ph/0604261
7 T. Hur, D.-W. Jung, P. Ko, and J. Y. Lee Electroweak symmetry breaking and cold dark matter from strongly interacting hidden sector PLB 696 (2011) 262 0709.1218
8 G. D. Kribs, T. S. Roy, J. Terning, and K. M. Zurek Quirky composite dark matter PRD 81 (2010) 095001 0909.2034
9 H. Beauchesne, E. Bertuzzo, and G. Grilli Di Cortona Dark matter in Hidden Valley models with stable and unstable light dark mesons JHEP 04 (2019) 118 1809.10152
10 A. Francis, R. J. Hudspith, R. Lewis, and S. Tulin Dark matter from strong dynamics: the minimal theory of dark baryons JHEP 12 (2018) 118 1809.09117
11 E. Bernreuther, F. Kahlhoefer, M. Krämer, and P. Tunney Strongly interacting dark sectors in the early universe and at the LHC through a simplified portal JHEP 01 (2020) 162 1907.04346
12 S. Knapen, J. Shelton, and D. Xu Perturbative benchmark models for a dark shower search program PRD 103 (2021) 115013 2103.01238
13 S. Born, R. Karur, S. Knapen, and J. Shelton Scouting for dark showers at CMS and LHCb PRD 108 (2023) 035034 2303.04167
14 D. Curtin et al. Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson PRD 90 (2014) 075004 1312.4992
15 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
link
16 CMS Collaboration Enriching the physics program of the CMS experiment via data scouting and data parking Phys. Rept. 1115 (2025) 678 CMS-EXO-23-007
2403.16134
17 CMS Collaboration Recording and reconstructing 10 billion unbiased b hadron decays in CMS Technical Report CMS-CR-2020-081, CERN, Geneva, 2020
link
18 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying into muon pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV collected with a dedicated high-rate data stream JHEP 04 (2022) 062 CMS-EXO-20-014
2112.13769
19 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying to final states with a pair of muons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13.6 TeV JHEP 05 (2024) 047 CMS-EXO-23-014
2402.14491
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles in final states with displaced dimuon vertices in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 99 (2019) 012001 1808.03057
21 LHCb Collaboration Searches for low-mass dimuon resonances JHEP 10 (2020) 156 2007.03923
22 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived particles decaying in the CMS muon detectors in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 110 (2024) 032007 CMS-EXO-21-008
2402.01898
23 CMS Collaboration Search for dark QCD with emerging jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2024) 142 CMS-EXO-22-015
2403.01556
24 CMS Collaboration Search for new particles decaying to a jet and an emerging jet JHEP 02 (2019) 179 CMS-EXO-18-001
1810.10069
25 P. Schwaller, D. Stolarski, and A. Weiler Emerging jets JHEP 05 (2015) 059 1502.05409
26 S. Renner and P. Schwaller A flavoured dark sector JHEP 08 (2018) 052 1803.08080
27 CMSnoop none \hrefHEPData record for this analysis, 2025
link
28 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
29 CMS Collaboration Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3 JINST 19 (2024) P05064 CMS-PRF-21-001
2309.05466
30 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
31 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
32 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
33 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
34 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
35 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
36 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
37 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
38 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
39 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
40 C. Bierlich et al. A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3 SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022 (2022) 8 2203.11601
41 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
42 L. Carloni, J. Rathsman, and T. Sjostrand Discerning secluded sector gauge structures JHEP 04 (2011) 091 1102.3795
43 D. Curtin, R. Essig, S. Gori, and J. Shelton Illuminating dark photons with high-energy colliders JHEP 02 (2015) 157 1412.0018
44 T. Chen and C. Guestrin XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, p. 785. ACM, 2016
link
45 T. Chen et al. xgboost: Extreme gradient boosting R package version 2.0.3, 2024
https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost
46 R. Fruhwirth Application of Kalman filtering to track and vertex fitting NIM A 262 (1987) 444
47 T. Speer et al. Vertex fitting in the CMS tracker Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2006-032, CERN, Geneva, 2006
48 P. D. Dauncey, M. Kenzie, N. Wardle, and G. J. Davies Handling uncertainties in background shapes: the discrete profiling method JINST 10 (2015) P04015 1408.6865
49 CMS Collaboration Search for a high-mass dimuon resonance produced in association with b quark jets at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 10 (2023) 043 CMS-EXO-22-016
2307.08708
50 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the W and Z inclusive production cross sections at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC Technical Report, CERN, Geneva, 2011
CMS-PAS-EWK-10-005
51 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
52 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector Collaboration, D. de Florian et al., CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs. CERN, Geneva, 2017
link
53 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
54 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
55 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The $ CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN