CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-TOP-18-011
Measurement of the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ production cross section in the all-jet final state in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A measurement of the production cross section of top quark pairs in association with two b jets ($\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$) is presented, using data collected in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The cross section is measured in the all-jet decay channel of the top quark pairs by selecting events containing at least eight jets, of which two are identified as originating from the hadronisation of b quarks. A combination of multivariate analysis techniques is used to reduce the large background consisting uniquely of jets produced through the strong interaction, and to discriminate the jets originating from the top quark decays and additional jets. The cross section is measured for the visible $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ phase space, as well as for the full phase space, for which it is determined to be 5.5 $\pm$ 0.3 (stat) $^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ (syst) pb. The measured cross sections are compared with predictions of several event generators and are found to be generally higher than the theoretical predictions.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Figures References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Left: distribution of the QGLR. Right: distribution of the CWoLa BDT. Both distributions are shown after preselection, requiring $\chi ^{2} < $ 33.38, and at least eight selected jets. All processes are taken from the simulation. The multijet contribution is scaled to match the total yields in data, after the other processes including the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ signal have been normalised to their corresponding theoretical cross sections. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. The lower panels show the ratio between the observed data and the predictions. Hatched bands in the upper and grey bands in the lower panel indicate the statistical uncertainty in the predictions, dominated by the uncertainties in the simulated multijet background.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Distribution of the QGLR. The distribution is shown after preselection, requiring $\chi ^{2} < $ 33.38, and at least eight selected jets. All processes are taken from the simulation. The multijet contribution is scaled to match the total yields in data, after the other processes including the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ signal have been normalised to their corresponding theoretical cross sections. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. The lower panel shows the ratio between the observed data and the predictions. Hatched bands in the upper and grey bands in the lower panel indicate the statistical uncertainty in the predictions, dominated by the uncertainties in the simulated multijet background.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Distribution of the CWoLa BDT. The distribution is shown after preselection, requiring $\chi ^{2} < $ 33.38, and at least eight selected jets. All processes are taken from the simulation. The multijet contribution is scaled to match the total yields in data, after the other processes including the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ signal have been normalised to their corresponding theoretical cross sections. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. The lower panel shows the ratio between the observed data and the predictions. Hatched bands in the upper and grey bands in the lower panel indicate the statistical uncertainty in the predictions, dominated by the uncertainties in the simulated multijet background.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the CR1 (upper left), SR (upper right), CR2 (lower left) and CR3 (lower right) regions. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. As a result, the multijet contributions in the CR1, CR2 and CR3 match the differences between the yields in data and from the other processes. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and bottom panels show the ratio between data and post fit predictions.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the CR1 region. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. As a result, the multijet contributions in the CR1, CR2 and CR3 match the differences between the yields in data and from the other processes. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and the bottom panel shows the ratio between data and post fit predictions.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the SR region. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and the bottom panel shows the ratio between data and post fit predictions.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the CR2 region. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. As a result, the multijet contributions in the CR1, CR2 and CR3 match the differences between the yields in data and from the other processes. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and the bottom panel shows the ratio between data and post fit predictions.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the CR3 region. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. As a result, the multijet contributions in the CR1, CR2 and CR3 match the differences between the yields in data and from the other processes. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and the bottom panel shows the ratio between data and post fit predictions.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Comparison of the measured ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ production cross sections with predictions from several Monte Carlo generators, for the three definitions of the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ phase space. Uncertainty bands in the theoretical cross sections include the statistical uncertainty as well as the uncertainties due to the PDFs and to the $\mu _\mathrm {R}$ and $\mu _\mathrm {F}$ scale variations.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The various sources of systematic uncertainties and their respective contribution, quoted as a percentage of the measured cross section, to the total systematic uncertainty in the measured ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ cross section in the VPS for the two ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ definitions.

png pdf
Table 2:
Measured and predicted cross sections (in pb) for the different definitions of the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ phase space considered in this analysis. For the measurements, the first uncertainty is statistical, while the second is the systematic uncertainty. The uncertainties in the predicted cross sections include the statistical uncertainty, the PDF uncertainties, and the $\mu _R$ and $\mu _F$ scale variations. Parton shower scale uncertainties are not included, and amount to about 15% for POWHEG+PYTHIA. Unless specified otherwise, PYTHIA is used for the modelling of the parton shower, hadronisation and underlying event.
Summary
The first measurement of the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ cross section $\sigma_{\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}}$ in the all-jets final state, using 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, has been presented. The cross section is measured in the visible particle-level phase space using two definitions of $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ events, as well as in the full phase space. One definition in the visible phase space does not rely on parton-level information, while the other uses parton-level information to identify the particle-level jets that do not originate from the decay of the top quarks. For both definitions, the cross section is measured to be $\sigma_{\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}}= $ 1.6 $\pm$ 0.1 (stat) $^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ (syst) pb. The cross section in the full phase space is obtained by correcting this latter measurement for the experimental acceptance on the jets stemming from the top quarks, yielding 5.5 $\pm$ 0.3 (stat) $^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ (syst) pb. This measurement provides valuable input to studies of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{H}$ process, where the Higgs boson decays into a pair of b quarks, and for which the normalisation and modelling of the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ process represent a leading source of systematic uncertainty. Furthermore, these results represent a stringent test for perturbative QCD predictions at the LHC. The tensions between measurements and theoretical predictions call for new developments in the modelling of the associated production of top quark pairs and b jets.
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1:
Distribution of the quark-gluon likelihood value of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$-leading jet, for events which pass the preselection, contain eight or more jets, and satisfy $\chi ^{2} < $ 33.38. All processes are taken from the simulation. The QCD multijet contribution is scaled to match the total yields in data, after the other processes including the ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ signal have been normalised to their corresponding theoretical cross sections. The small backgrounds include $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {\mathrm {H}} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. The lower panel shows the ratio between the observed data and the predictions. Hatched and grey bands indicate the statistical uncertainty in the predictions, dominated by the uncertainties in the simulated multijet background.

png pdf
Additional Figure 2:
Prefit distribution of the ratio S/B between the signal and background yields in each bin of the 2DCSV in the SR, CR1, CR2, and CR3 regions. The two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b-tagging discriminator values of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of S/B in the SR. The signal contribution includes ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$, ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ (OOA), ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} 2 {\mathrm {b}}}$ and ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {\mathrm {b}}}$.

png pdf
Additional Figure 3:
Comparison of the measured ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ production cross sections with predictions from several Monte Carlo generators, for parton-agnostic definition of the visible ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ phase space. Uncertainty bands in the theoretical cross sections include the statistical uncertainty as well as the uncertainties due to the PDFs and to the $\mu _\mathrm {R}$ and $\mu _\mathrm {F}$ scale variations.

png pdf
Additional Figure 4:
Comparison of the measured ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ production cross sections with predictions from several Monte Carlo generators, for parton-based definition of the visible ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ phase space. Uncertainty bands in the theoretical cross sections include the statistical uncertainty as well as the uncertainties due to the PDFs and to the $\mu _\mathrm {R}$ and $\mu _\mathrm {F}$ scale variations.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector PLB 784 (2018) 173 1806.00425
2 CMS Collaboration Observation of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{H} $ production PRL 120 (2018) 231801 CMS-HIG-17-035
1804.02610
3 ATLAS Collaboration Search for the standard model Higgs boson produced in association with top quarks and decaying into a $ \mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ pair in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 ~TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 97 (2018) 072016 1712.08895
4 ATLAS Collaboration Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson decaying into $ \mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ produced in association with top quarks decaying hadronically in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 05 (2016) 160 1604.03812
5 CMS Collaboration Search for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{H} $ production in the all-jet final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 ~TeV JHEP 06 (2018) 101 CMS-HIG-17-022
1803.06986
6 CMS Collaboration Search for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{H} $ production in the $ \mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ decay channel with leptonic $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ decays in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2019) 026 CMS-HIG-17-026
1804.03682
7 ATLAS Collaboration Search for four-top-quark production in the single-lepton and opposite-sign dilepton final states in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 99 (2019) 052009 1811.02305
8 CMS Collaboration Search for Standard Model production of four top quarks in the lepton + jets channel in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 11 (2014) 154 CMS-TOP-13-012
1409.7339
9 CMS Collaboration Search for standard model production of four top quarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 772 (2017) 336 CMS-TOP-16-016
1702.06164
10 M. Worek Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ production at the LHC Acta Phys. Polon. B 40 (2009) 2937
11 G. Bevilacqua et al. Assault on the NLO wishlist: $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ JHEP 09 (2009) 109 0907.4723
12 G. Bevilacqua, M. Czakon, C. G. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek Hadronic top-quark pair production in association with two jets at next-to-leading order QCD PRD 84 (2011) 114017
13 G. Bevilacqua, M. Czakon, C. G. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek Dominant QCD backgrounds in Higgs boson analyses at the LHC: A study of $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $+2 jets at next-to-leading order PRL 104 (2010) 162002
14 A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and S. Pozzorini NLO QCD corrections to top anti-top bottom anti-bottom production at the LHC: 2. full hadronic results JHEP 03 (2010) 021 1001.4006
15 M. Worek On the next-to-leading order QCD $ \mathcal{K} $-factor for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ production at the TeVatron JHEP 02 (2012) 043 1112.4325
16 M. V. Garzelli, A. Kardos, and Z. Trócsányi Hadroproduction of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ final states at LHC: predictions at NLO accuracy matched with parton shower JHEP 03 (2015) 083 1408.0266
17 A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and S. Pozzorini NLO QCD corrections to $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}}+X $ at the LHC PRL 103 (2009) 012002 0905.0110
18 F. Cascioli et al. NLO matching for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ production with massive $ \mathrm{b} $-quarks PLB 734 (2014) 210 1309.5912
19 G. Bevilacqua, M. V. Garzelli, and A. Kardos $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ hadroproduction with massive bottom quarks with PowHel 1709.06915
20 T. Ježo, J. M. Lindert, N. Moretti, and S. Pozzorini New NLOPS predictions for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ + $ \mathrm{b} $-jet production at the LHC EPJC 78 (2018) 502 1802.00426
21 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of fiducial cross-sections for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production with one or two additional $ \mathrm{b} $-jets in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016) 11 1508.06868
22 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production with additional heavy-flavour jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 04 (2019) 046 1811.12113
23 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the cross section ratio $ \sigma_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}}} / \sigma_\mathrm{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} $ in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PLB 746 (2015) 132 CMS-TOP-13-010
1411.5621
24 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production with additional jet activity, including $ \mathrm{b} $ quark jets, in the dilepton decay channel using $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 379 CMS-TOP-12-041
1510.03072
25 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ cross sections in association with $ \mathrm{b} $ jets and inclusive jets and their ratio using dilepton final states in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 776 (2018) 355 CMS-TOP-16-010
1705.10141
26 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
27 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
28 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
29 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
30 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
31 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
32 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
33 E. Re Single-top $ \mathrm{W}\mathrm{t} $-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
34 H. B. Hartanto, B. Jager, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX PRD 91 (2015) 094003 1501.04498
35 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
36 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
37 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
38 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
39 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2015) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
40 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in Pythia 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CDS
41 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
42 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
43 N. Kidonakis Top quark production 1311.0283
44 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in the framework of the FEWZ simulation code PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
45 T. Gehrmann et al. $ \mathrm{W}^+\mathrm{W}^- $ production at hadron colliders in next to next to leading order QCD PRL 113 (2014) 212001 1408.5243
46 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
47 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
48 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
49 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
50 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
51 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
52 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collision events at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
53 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
54 CMS Collaboration Performance of quark/gluon discrimination in 8 $ TeV {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ data CMS-PAS-JME-13-002 CMS-PAS-JME-13-002
55 CMS Collaboration Performance of quark/gluon discrimination in 13 TeV data CDS
56 H. Voss, H. Hocker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt TMVA: Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis with ROOT PoS ACAT (2007) 040
57 E. M. Metodiev, B. Nachman, and J. Thaler Classification without labels: learning from mixed samples in high energy physics JHEP 10 (2017) 174 1708.02949
58 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 ~TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PRL 117 (2016) 182002 1606.02625
59 J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands String formation beyond leading colour JHEP 08 (2015) 003 1505.01681
60 S. Argyropoulos and T. Sjöstrand Effects of color reconnection on $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ final states at the LHC JHEP 11 (2014) 043 1407.6653
61 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ differential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using events containing two leptons JHEP 02 (2019) 149 CMS-TOP-17-014
1811.06625
62 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for the production of top quark pairs and of additional jets in lepton+jets events from $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 97 (2018) 112003 CMS-TOP-17-002
1803.08856
63 CMS Collaboration Measurements of differential cross sections of top quark pair production as a function of kinematic event variables in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2018) 002 CMS-TOP-16-014
1803.03991
64 CMS Collaboration Measurement of normalized differential $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ cross sections in the dilepton channel from $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 04 (2018) 060 CMS-TOP-16-007
1708.07638
65 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production cross section using events with one lepton and at least one jet in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 09 (2017) 051 CMS-TOP-16-006
1701.06228
66 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production cross section using events in the e$ \mu $ final state in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 77 (2017) 172 CMS-TOP-16-005
1611.04040
67 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV PRD 95 (2017) 092001 CMS-TOP-16-008
1610.04191
68 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross sections for top quark pair production as a function of kinematic event variables in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV PRD 94 (2016) 052006 CMS-TOP-12-042
1607.00837
69 M. Bahr et al. Herwig++ physics and manual EPJC 58 (2008) 639 0803.0883
70 S. Gieseke, C. Rohr, and A. Siodmok Colour reconnections in Herwig++ EPJC 72 (2012) 2225 1206.0041
71 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN