CMS-PAS-TOP-18-011 | ||
Measurement of the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ production cross section in the all-jet final state in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | ||
CMS Collaboration | ||
May 2019 | ||
Abstract: A measurement of the production cross section of top quark pairs in association with two b jets ($\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$) is presented, using data collected in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The cross section is measured in the all-jet decay channel of the top quark pairs by selecting events containing at least eight jets, of which two are identified as originating from the hadronisation of b quarks. A combination of multivariate analysis techniques is used to reduce the large background consisting uniquely of jets produced through the strong interaction, and to discriminate the jets originating from the top quark decays and additional jets. The cross section is measured for the visible $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ phase space, as well as for the full phase space, for which it is determined to be 5.5 $\pm$ 0.3 (stat) $^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ (syst) pb. The measured cross sections are compared with predictions of several event generators and are found to be generally higher than the theoretical predictions. | ||
Links:
CDS record (PDF) ;
CADI line (restricted) ;
These preliminary results are superseded in this paper, PLB 803 (2020) 135285. The superseded preliminary plots can be found here. |
Figures & Tables | Summary | Additional Figures | References | CMS Publications |
---|
Figures | |
png pdf |
Figure 1:
Left: distribution of the QGLR. Right: distribution of the CWoLa BDT. Both distributions are shown after preselection, requiring $\chi ^{2} < $ 33.38, and at least eight selected jets. All processes are taken from the simulation. The multijet contribution is scaled to match the total yields in data, after the other processes including the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ signal have been normalised to their corresponding theoretical cross sections. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. The lower panels show the ratio between the observed data and the predictions. Hatched bands in the upper and grey bands in the lower panel indicate the statistical uncertainty in the predictions, dominated by the uncertainties in the simulated multijet background. |
png pdf |
Figure 1-a:
Distribution of the QGLR. The distribution is shown after preselection, requiring $\chi ^{2} < $ 33.38, and at least eight selected jets. All processes are taken from the simulation. The multijet contribution is scaled to match the total yields in data, after the other processes including the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ signal have been normalised to their corresponding theoretical cross sections. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. The lower panel shows the ratio between the observed data and the predictions. Hatched bands in the upper and grey bands in the lower panel indicate the statistical uncertainty in the predictions, dominated by the uncertainties in the simulated multijet background. |
png pdf |
Figure 1-b:
Distribution of the CWoLa BDT. The distribution is shown after preselection, requiring $\chi ^{2} < $ 33.38, and at least eight selected jets. All processes are taken from the simulation. The multijet contribution is scaled to match the total yields in data, after the other processes including the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ signal have been normalised to their corresponding theoretical cross sections. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. The lower panel shows the ratio between the observed data and the predictions. Hatched bands in the upper and grey bands in the lower panel indicate the statistical uncertainty in the predictions, dominated by the uncertainties in the simulated multijet background. |
png pdf |
Figure 2:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the CR1 (upper left), SR (upper right), CR2 (lower left) and CR3 (lower right) regions. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. As a result, the multijet contributions in the CR1, CR2 and CR3 match the differences between the yields in data and from the other processes. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and bottom panels show the ratio between data and post fit predictions. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-a:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the CR1 region. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. As a result, the multijet contributions in the CR1, CR2 and CR3 match the differences between the yields in data and from the other processes. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and the bottom panel shows the ratio between data and post fit predictions. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-b:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the SR region. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and the bottom panel shows the ratio between data and post fit predictions. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-c:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the CR2 region. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. As a result, the multijet contributions in the CR1, CR2 and CR3 match the differences between the yields in data and from the other processes. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and the bottom panel shows the ratio between data and post fit predictions. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-d:
Distribution of the 2DCSV in the CR3 region. For visualisation purposes, the two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b tagging discriminator scores of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of the ratio between expected signal and background yields in each bin in the SR. The contribution due to QCD multijet production is estimated from the data in the four regions according to the method described in Section 6. As a result, the multijet contributions in the CR1, CR2 and CR3 match the differences between the yields in data and from the other processes. The small backgrounds include ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{H} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. Hatched and grey bands correspond to post fit uncertainties, and the bottom panel shows the ratio between data and post fit predictions. |
png pdf |
Figure 3:
Comparison of the measured ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ production cross sections with predictions from several Monte Carlo generators, for the three definitions of the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ phase space. Uncertainty bands in the theoretical cross sections include the statistical uncertainty as well as the uncertainties due to the PDFs and to the $\mu _\mathrm {R}$ and $\mu _\mathrm {F}$ scale variations. |
Tables | |
png pdf |
Table 1:
The various sources of systematic uncertainties and their respective contribution, quoted as a percentage of the measured cross section, to the total systematic uncertainty in the measured ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ cross section in the VPS for the two ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ definitions. |
png pdf |
Table 2:
Measured and predicted cross sections (in pb) for the different definitions of the ${{\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} \mathrm{b} {}\mathrm{\bar{b}}}$ phase space considered in this analysis. For the measurements, the first uncertainty is statistical, while the second is the systematic uncertainty. The uncertainties in the predicted cross sections include the statistical uncertainty, the PDF uncertainties, and the $\mu _R$ and $\mu _F$ scale variations. Parton shower scale uncertainties are not included, and amount to about 15% for POWHEG+PYTHIA. Unless specified otherwise, PYTHIA is used for the modelling of the parton shower, hadronisation and underlying event. |
Summary |
The first measurement of the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ cross section $\sigma_{\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}}$ in the all-jets final state, using 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, has been presented. The cross section is measured in the visible particle-level phase space using two definitions of $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ events, as well as in the full phase space. One definition in the visible phase space does not rely on parton-level information, while the other uses parton-level information to identify the particle-level jets that do not originate from the decay of the top quarks. For both definitions, the cross section is measured to be $\sigma_{\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}}= $ 1.6 $\pm$ 0.1 (stat) $^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ (syst) pb. The cross section in the full phase space is obtained by correcting this latter measurement for the experimental acceptance on the jets stemming from the top quarks, yielding 5.5 $\pm$ 0.3 (stat) $^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ (syst) pb. This measurement provides valuable input to studies of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{H}$ process, where the Higgs boson decays into a pair of b quarks, and for which the normalisation and modelling of the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ process represent a leading source of systematic uncertainty. Furthermore, these results represent a stringent test for perturbative QCD predictions at the LHC. The tensions between measurements and theoretical predictions call for new developments in the modelling of the associated production of top quark pairs and b jets. |
Additional Figures | |
png pdf |
Additional Figure 1:
Distribution of the quark-gluon likelihood value of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$-leading jet, for events which pass the preselection, contain eight or more jets, and satisfy $\chi ^{2} < $ 33.38. All processes are taken from the simulation. The QCD multijet contribution is scaled to match the total yields in data, after the other processes including the ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ signal have been normalised to their corresponding theoretical cross sections. The small backgrounds include $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {\mathrm {V}} $, $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {\mathrm {H}} $, single top quark, V+jets and diboson production. The lower panel shows the ratio between the observed data and the predictions. Hatched and grey bands indicate the statistical uncertainty in the predictions, dominated by the uncertainties in the simulated multijet background. |
png pdf |
Additional Figure 2:
Prefit distribution of the ratio S/B between the signal and background yields in each bin of the 2DCSV in the SR, CR1, CR2, and CR3 regions. The two-dimensional distribution of the largest and second-largest b-tagging discriminator values of the additional jets has been unrolled to one dimension, and the resulting bins have been ordered to increasing values of S/B in the SR. The signal contribution includes ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$, ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ (OOA), ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} 2 {\mathrm {b}}}$ and ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {\mathrm {b}}}$. |
png pdf |
Additional Figure 3:
Comparison of the measured ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ production cross sections with predictions from several Monte Carlo generators, for parton-agnostic definition of the visible ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ phase space. Uncertainty bands in the theoretical cross sections include the statistical uncertainty as well as the uncertainties due to the PDFs and to the $\mu _\mathrm {R}$ and $\mu _\mathrm {F}$ scale variations. |
png pdf |
Additional Figure 4:
Comparison of the measured ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ production cross sections with predictions from several Monte Carlo generators, for parton-based definition of the visible ${{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} {{\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}}}}$ phase space. Uncertainty bands in the theoretical cross sections include the statistical uncertainty as well as the uncertainties due to the PDFs and to the $\mu _\mathrm {R}$ and $\mu _\mathrm {F}$ scale variations. |
References | ||||
1 | ATLAS Collaboration | Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector | PLB 784 (2018) 173 | 1806.00425 |
2 | CMS Collaboration | Observation of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{H} $ production | PRL 120 (2018) 231801 | CMS-HIG-17-035 1804.02610 |
3 | ATLAS Collaboration | Search for the standard model Higgs boson produced in association with top quarks and decaying into a $ \mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ pair in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 ~TeV with the ATLAS detector | PRD 97 (2018) 072016 | 1712.08895 |
4 | ATLAS Collaboration | Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson decaying into $ \mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ produced in association with top quarks decaying hadronically in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector | JHEP 05 (2016) 160 | 1604.03812 |
5 | CMS Collaboration | Search for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{H} $ production in the all-jet final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 ~TeV | JHEP 06 (2018) 101 | CMS-HIG-17-022 1803.06986 |
6 | CMS Collaboration | Search for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{H} $ production in the $ \mathrm{H} \to \mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ decay channel with leptonic $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ decays in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | JHEP 03 (2019) 026 | CMS-HIG-17-026 1804.03682 |
7 | ATLAS Collaboration | Search for four-top-quark production in the single-lepton and opposite-sign dilepton final states in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector | PRD 99 (2019) 052009 | 1811.02305 |
8 | CMS Collaboration | Search for Standard Model production of four top quarks in the lepton + jets channel in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV | JHEP 11 (2014) 154 | CMS-TOP-13-012 1409.7339 |
9 | CMS Collaboration | Search for standard model production of four top quarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | PLB 772 (2017) 336 | CMS-TOP-16-016 1702.06164 |
10 | M. Worek | Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ production at the LHC | Acta Phys. Polon. B 40 (2009) 2937 | |
11 | G. Bevilacqua et al. | Assault on the NLO wishlist: $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ | JHEP 09 (2009) 109 | 0907.4723 |
12 | G. Bevilacqua, M. Czakon, C. G. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek | Hadronic top-quark pair production in association with two jets at next-to-leading order QCD | PRD 84 (2011) 114017 | |
13 | G. Bevilacqua, M. Czakon, C. G. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek | Dominant QCD backgrounds in Higgs boson analyses at the LHC: A study of $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $+2 jets at next-to-leading order | PRL 104 (2010) 162002 | |
14 | A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and S. Pozzorini | NLO QCD corrections to top anti-top bottom anti-bottom production at the LHC: 2. full hadronic results | JHEP 03 (2010) 021 | 1001.4006 |
15 | M. Worek | On the next-to-leading order QCD $ \mathcal{K} $-factor for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ production at the TeVatron | JHEP 02 (2012) 043 | 1112.4325 |
16 | M. V. Garzelli, A. Kardos, and Z. Trócsányi | Hadroproduction of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ final states at LHC: predictions at NLO accuracy matched with parton shower | JHEP 03 (2015) 083 | 1408.0266 |
17 | A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and S. Pozzorini | NLO QCD corrections to $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}}+X $ at the LHC | PRL 103 (2009) 012002 | 0905.0110 |
18 | F. Cascioli et al. | NLO matching for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ production with massive $ \mathrm{b} $-quarks | PLB 734 (2014) 210 | 1309.5912 |
19 | G. Bevilacqua, M. V. Garzelli, and A. Kardos | $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}} $ hadroproduction with massive bottom quarks with PowHel | 1709.06915 | |
20 | T. Ježo, J. M. Lindert, N. Moretti, and S. Pozzorini | New NLOPS predictions for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ + $ \mathrm{b} $-jet production at the LHC | EPJC 78 (2018) 502 | 1802.00426 |
21 | ATLAS Collaboration | Measurements of fiducial cross-sections for $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production with one or two additional $ \mathrm{b} $-jets in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector | EPJC 76 (2016) 11 | 1508.06868 |
22 | ATLAS Collaboration | Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production with additional heavy-flavour jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector | JHEP 04 (2019) 046 | 1811.12113 |
23 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the cross section ratio $ \sigma_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{\bar{b}}} / \sigma_\mathrm{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} $ in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV | PLB 746 (2015) 132 | CMS-TOP-13-010 1411.5621 |
24 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production with additional jet activity, including $ \mathrm{b} $ quark jets, in the dilepton decay channel using $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV | EPJC 76 (2016) 379 | CMS-TOP-12-041 1510.03072 |
25 | CMS Collaboration | Measurements of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ cross sections in association with $ \mathrm{b} $ jets and inclusive jets and their ratio using dilepton final states in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | PLB 776 (2018) 355 | CMS-TOP-16-010 1705.10141 |
26 | CMS Collaboration | CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period | CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 | CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 |
27 | CMS Collaboration | The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC | JINST 3 (2008) S08004 | CMS-00-001 |
28 | P. Nason | A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms | JHEP 11 (2004) 040 | hep-ph/0409146 |
29 | S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari | Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method | JHEP 11 (2007) 070 | 0709.2092 |
30 | S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re | A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX | JHEP 06 (2010) 043 | 1002.2581 |
31 | S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi | A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction | JHEP 09 (2007) 126 | 0707.3088 |
32 | S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re | NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions | JHEP 09 (2009) 111 | 0907.4076 |
33 | E. Re | Single-top $ \mathrm{W}\mathrm{t} $-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method | EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 | 1009.2450 |
34 | H. B. Hartanto, B. Jager, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth | Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX | PRD 91 (2015) 094003 | 1501.04498 |
35 | J. Alwall et al. | The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations | JHEP 07 (2014) 079 | 1405.0301 |
36 | J. Alwall et al. | Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions | EPJC 53 (2008) 473 | 0706.2569 |
37 | T. Sjostrand et al. | An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 | CPC 191 (2015) 159 | 1410.3012 |
38 | NNPDF Collaboration | Parton distributions for the LHC Run II | JHEP 04 (2015) 040 | 1410.8849 |
39 | CMS Collaboration | Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements | EPJC 76 (2015) 155 | CMS-GEN-14-001 1512.00815 |
40 | CMS Collaboration | Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in Pythia 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV | CDS | |
41 | GEANT4 Collaboration | GEANT4---a simulation toolkit | NIMA 506 (2003) 250 | |
42 | M. Czakon and A. Mitov | Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders | CPC 185 (2014) 2930 | 1112.5675 |
43 | N. Kidonakis | Top quark production | 1311.0283 | |
44 | Y. Li and F. Petriello | Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in the framework of the FEWZ simulation code | PRD 86 (2012) 094034 | 1208.5967 |
45 | T. Gehrmann et al. | $ \mathrm{W}^+\mathrm{W}^- $ production at hadron colliders in next to next to leading order QCD | PRL 113 (2014) 212001 | 1408.5243 |
46 | J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams | Vector boson pair production at the LHC | JHEP 07 (2011) 018 | 1105.0020 |
47 | M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez | The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm | JHEP 04 (2008) 063 | 0802.1189 |
48 | M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez | FastJet user manual | EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 | 1111.6097 |
49 | CMS Collaboration | Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector | JINST 12 (2017) P10003 | CMS-PRF-14-001 1706.04965 |
50 | CMS Collaboration | Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at 8 TeV | JINST 12 (2017) P02014 | CMS-JME-13-004 1607.03663 |
51 | CMS Collaboration | Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at 13 TeV | JINST 13 (2018) P05011 | CMS-BTV-16-002 1712.07158 |
52 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collision events at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV | JINST 7 (2012) P10002 | CMS-MUO-10-004 1206.4071 |
53 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV | JINST 10 (2015) P06005 | CMS-EGM-13-001 1502.02701 |
54 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of quark/gluon discrimination in 8 $ TeV {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ data | CMS-PAS-JME-13-002 | CMS-PAS-JME-13-002 |
55 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of quark/gluon discrimination in 13 TeV data | CDS | |
56 | H. Voss, H. Hocker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt | TMVA: Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis with ROOT | PoS ACAT (2007) 040 | |
57 | E. M. Metodiev, B. Nachman, and J. Thaler | Classification without labels: learning from mixed samples in high energy physics | JHEP 10 (2017) 174 | 1708.02949 |
58 | ATLAS Collaboration | Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 ~TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC | PRL 117 (2016) 182002 | 1606.02625 |
59 | J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands | String formation beyond leading colour | JHEP 08 (2015) 003 | 1505.01681 |
60 | S. Argyropoulos and T. Sjöstrand | Effects of color reconnection on $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ final states at the LHC | JHEP 11 (2014) 043 | 1407.6653 |
61 | CMS Collaboration | Measurements of $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ differential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using events containing two leptons | JHEP 02 (2019) 149 | CMS-TOP-17-014 1811.06625 |
62 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of differential cross sections for the production of top quark pairs and of additional jets in lepton+jets events from $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | PRD 97 (2018) 112003 | CMS-TOP-17-002 1803.08856 |
63 | CMS Collaboration | Measurements of differential cross sections of top quark pair production as a function of kinematic event variables in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | JHEP 06 (2018) 002 | CMS-TOP-16-014 1803.03991 |
64 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of normalized differential $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ cross sections in the dilepton channel from $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | JHEP 04 (2018) 060 | CMS-TOP-16-007 1708.07638 |
65 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production cross section using events with one lepton and at least one jet in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | JHEP 09 (2017) 051 | CMS-TOP-16-006 1701.06228 |
66 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{\bar{t}} $ production cross section using events in the e$ \mu $ final state in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | EPJC 77 (2017) 172 | CMS-TOP-16-005 1611.04040 |
67 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV | PRD 95 (2017) 092001 | CMS-TOP-16-008 1610.04191 |
68 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the differential cross sections for top quark pair production as a function of kinematic event variables in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV | PRD 94 (2016) 052006 | CMS-TOP-12-042 1607.00837 |
69 | M. Bahr et al. | Herwig++ physics and manual | EPJC 58 (2008) 639 | 0803.0883 |
70 | S. Gieseke, C. Rohr, and A. Siodmok | Colour reconnections in Herwig++ | EPJC 72 (2012) 2225 | 1206.0041 |
71 | R. Frederix and S. Frixione | Merging meets matching in MC@NLO | JHEP 12 (2012) 061 | 1209.6215 |
Compact Muon Solenoid LHC, CERN |