CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-HIG-20-017 ; CERN-EP-2021-045
Search for charged Higgs bosons produced in vector boson fusion processes and decaying into vector boson pairs in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 723
Abstract: A search for charged Higgs bosons produced in vector boson fusion processes and decaying into vector bosons, using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV at the LHC, is reported. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$ collected with the CMS detector. Events are selected by requiring two or three electrons or muons, moderate missing transverse momentum, and two jets with a large rapidity separation and a large dijet mass. No excess of events with respect to the standard model background predictions is observed. Model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level are reported on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for vector boson fusion production of charged Higgs bosons as a function of mass, from 200 to 3000 GeV. The results are interpreted in the context of the Georgi-Machacek model.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Examples of Feynman diagrams showing the production of singly (left) and doubly (right) charged Higgs bosons via VBF.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Example of Feynman diagram showing the production of a singly charged Higgs boson via VBF.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Example of Feynman diagram showing the production of a doubly charged Higgs boson via VBF.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Representative Feynman diagrams of a VBS process contributing to the EW-induced production of events containing $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ (left) and WZ (right) boson pairs decaying to leptons, and two forward jets.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Representative Feynman diagram of a VBS process contributing to the EW-induced production of events containing a $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ boson pair decaying to leptons, and two forward jets.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Representative Feynman diagram of a VBS process contributing to the EW-induced production of events containing a WZ boson pair decaying to leptons, and two forward jets.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Representative Feynman diagrams of the QCD-induced production of $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ (left) and WZ (right) boson pairs decaying to leptons, and two jets.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Representative Feynman diagram of the QCD-induced production of a WZ boson pair decaying to leptons, and two jets.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Representative Feynman diagrams of the QCD-induced production of $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ (left) and WZ (right) boson pairs decaying to leptons, and two jets.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distributions after requiring the same selection as for the WW (left) and WZ (right) SRs, but with a requirement of 200 $ < {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} < $ 500 GeV. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit (described in Section 7) for the background-only hypothesis i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. Vertical bars on data points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{t} {\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering, VVV, and from oppositely charged dilepton final states from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $, $\mathrm{t} \mathrm{W} $, $\mathrm{W} ^{+}\mathrm{W} ^{-}$, and Drell-Yan processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panels show the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The hatched gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The solid lines show the signal predictions for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distributions after requiring the same selection as for the WW SR, but with a requirement of 200 $ < {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} < $ 500 GeV. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit (described in Section 7) for the background-only hypothesis i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. Vertical bars on data points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{t} {\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering, VVV, and from oppositely charged dilepton final states from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $, $\mathrm{t} \mathrm{W} $, $\mathrm{W} ^{+}\mathrm{W} ^{-}$, and Drell-Yan processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The hatched gray band represents the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The solid lines show the signal predictions for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distributions after requiring the same selection as for the WZ SR, but with a requirement of 200 $ < {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} < $ 500 GeV. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit (described in Section 7) for the background-only hypothesis i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. Vertical bars on data points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{t} {\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering, VVV, and from oppositely charged dilepton final states from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $, $\mathrm{t} \mathrm{W} $, $\mathrm{W} ^{+}\mathrm{W} ^{-}$, and Drell-Yan processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The hatched gray band represents the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The solid lines show the signal predictions for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ (upper left) and $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{W} \mathrm{W}}$ (upper right) distributions in the WW SR, and the $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ (lower left) and $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z}}$ (lower right) distributions in the WZ SR for signal, backgrounds, and data. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit for the background-only hypothesis, i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. Vertical bars on data points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{t} {\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering, VVV, and from oppositely charged dilepton final states from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $, $\mathrm{t} \mathrm{W} $, $\mathrm{W} ^{+}\mathrm{W} ^{-}$, and Drell-Yan processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panels show the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The hatched gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The solid lines show the signal predictions for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distribution in the WW SR for signal, backgrounds, and data. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit for the background-only hypothesis, i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. Vertical bars on data points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{t} {\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering, VVV, and from oppositely charged dilepton final states from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $, $\mathrm{t} \mathrm{W} $, $\mathrm{W} ^{+}\mathrm{W} ^{-}$, and Drell-Yan processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The hatched gray band represents the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The solid lines show the signal predictions for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{W} \mathrm{W}}$ distribution in the WW SR for signal, backgrounds, and data. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit for the background-only hypothesis, i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. Vertical bars on data points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{t} {\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering, VVV, and from oppositely charged dilepton final states from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $, $\mathrm{t} \mathrm{W} $, $\mathrm{W} ^{+}\mathrm{W} ^{-}$, and Drell-Yan processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The hatched gray band represents the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The solid lines show the signal predictions for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distribution in the WZ SR for signal, backgrounds, and data. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit for the background-only hypothesis, i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. Vertical bars on data points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{t} {\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering, VVV, and from oppositely charged dilepton final states from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $, $\mathrm{t} \mathrm{W} $, $\mathrm{W} ^{+}\mathrm{W} ^{-}$, and Drell-Yan processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The hatched gray band represents the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The solid lines show the signal predictions for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z}}$ distribution in the WZ SR for signal, backgrounds, and data. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit for the background-only hypothesis, i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. Vertical bars on data points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{t} {\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering, VVV, and from oppositely charged dilepton final states from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $, $\mathrm{t} \mathrm{W} $, $\mathrm{W} ^{+}\mathrm{W} ^{-}$, and Drell-Yan processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The hatched gray band represents the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The solid lines show the signal predictions for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Distributions for signal, backgrounds, and data for the bins used in the simultaneous fit. The bins 1-32 (4$\times $8) show the events in the WW SR ($ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} \times {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $), the bins 33-46 (2$\times $7) show the events in the WZ SR ($ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} \times {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $), the 4 bins 47-50 show the events in the nonprompt lepton CR ($ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $), the 4 bins 51-54 show the events in the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ CR ($ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $), and the 4 bins 55-58 show the events in the $\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{Z} $ CR ($ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $). The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit for the background-only hypothesis, i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. Vertical bars on data points represent the statistical uncertainty in the data. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{t} {\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering, VVV, and from oppositely charged dilepton final states from ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $, $\mathrm{t} \mathrm{W} $, $\mathrm{W} ^{+}\mathrm{W} ^{-}$, and Drell-Yan processes. The overflow is included in the last bin in each corresponding region. The lower panels show the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The hatched gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields. The solid lines show the signal predictions for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Figure 7:
The product of acceptance and selection efficiency within the fiducial region for the VBF $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}\to {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} \to 2\ell 2\nu $ and ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} \to {\mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z}} \to 3\ell \nu $ processes, as a function of $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}}$. The combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties is shown. The theoretical uncertainties in the acceptance are also included.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Expected and observed exclusion limits at 95% CL for $\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}\to {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm})$ as functions of $m_{{\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}}$ (upper left), for $\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} \to {\mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z}})$ as functions of $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}}$ (upper right), and for $s_{\mathrm{H}}$ as functions of $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}}$ in the GM model (lower). The contribution of the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ ($ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$) boson signal is set to zero for the derivation of the exclusion limits on the $\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}\to {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm})$ ($\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} \to {\mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z}})$). The exclusion limits for $s_{\mathrm{H}}$ are shown up to $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 2000 GeV, given the low sensitivity in the GM model for values above that mass. Values above the curves are excluded.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Expected and observed exclusion limits at 95% CL for $\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}\to {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm})$ as functions of $m_{{\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}}$. The contribution of the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ ($ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$) boson signal is set to zero for the derivation of the exclusion limits on the $\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}\to {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm})$ ($\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} \to {\mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z}})$). The exclusion limits for $s_{\mathrm{H}}$ are shown up to $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 2000 GeV, given the low sensitivity in the GM model for values above that mass. Values above the curves are excluded.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Expected and observed exclusion limits at 95% CL for $\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} \to {\mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z}})$ as functions of $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}}$. The contribution of the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ ($ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$) boson signal is set to zero for the derivation of the exclusion limits on the $\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}\to {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm})$ ($\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} \to {\mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z}})$). The exclusion limits for $s_{\mathrm{H}}$ are shown up to $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 2000 GeV, given the low sensitivity in the GM model for values above that mass. Values above the curves are excluded.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
Expected and observed exclusion limits at 95% CL for $s_{\mathrm{H}}$ as functions of $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}}$ in the GM model. The contribution of the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ ($ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$) boson signal is set to zero for the derivation of the exclusion limits on the $\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}\to {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm})$ ($\sigma _\mathrm {VBF}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}}) + \mathcal {B}({\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} \to {\mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z}})$). The exclusion limits for $s_{\mathrm{H}}$ are shown up to $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 2000 GeV, given the low sensitivity in the GM model for values above that mass. Values above the curves are excluded.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the selection requirements defining the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ and WZ SRs. The looser lepton $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ requirement in the WZ selection refers to the trailing lepton from the $\mathrm{Z} $ boson decays. The $ {| {\mathrm {m}_{\ell \ell}} - m_{\mathrm{Z}} |}$ requirement is applied only to the dielectron final state in the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ SR.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the impact of the systematic uncertainties on the extracted signal strength; for the case of a background-only simulated data set, i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes, and including a charged Higgs boson signal for values of $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 and $m_{\mathrm{H} _{5}} = $ 500 GeV in the GM model.

png pdf
Table 3:
Expected signal and background yields from various SM processes and observed data events in all regions used in the analysis. The expected background yields are shown with their normalizations from the simultaneous fit for the background-only hypothesis, i.e., assuming no contributions from the ${\mathrm{\tilde{H}^{\pm_j}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{H} ^{\pm \pm}}$ processes. The expected signal yields are shown for $s_{\mathrm{H}}=$ 1.0 in the GM model. The combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties is shown.
Summary
A search for charged Higgs bosons produced in vector boson fusion processes and decaying into vector bosons, using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV at the LHC, is reported. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$, collected with the CMS detector between 2016 and 2018. The search is performed in the leptonic decay modes ${\mathrm{W}^\pm\mathrm{W}^\pm} \to \ell^\pm\nu\ell'^\pm\nu$ and $\mathrm{W}^\pm\mathrm{Z} \to \ell^\pm\nu\ell'^\pm\ell'^\mp$, where $\ell, \ell' = $ e, $\mu$. The ${\mathrm{W}^\pm\mathrm{W}^\pm} $ and ${\mathrm{W}\mathrm{Z}} $ channels are simultaneously studied by performing a binned maximum-likelihood fit using the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ and dijet invariant mass ${m_{{\mathrm{j}}{\mathrm{j}}}} $ distributions. No excess of events with respect to the standard model background predictions is observed. Model independent upper limits at 95% confidence level are reported on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for vector boson fusion production of charged Higgs bosons decaying into vector bosons as a function of mass from 200 to 3000 GeV. The results are interpreted in the Georgi-Machacek (GM) model for which the most stringent limits to date are derived. The observed 95% confidence level limits exclude GM $s_{\mathrm{H}}$ parameter values greater than 0.20-0.35 for the mass range from 200 to 1500 GeV.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
2 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
3 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
4 F. Englert and R. Brout Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons PRL 13 (1964) 321
5 P. W. Higgs Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields PL12 (1964) 132
6 P. W. Higgs Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons PRL 13 (1964) 508
7 G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble Global conservation laws and massless particles PRL 13 (1964) 585
8 P. W. Higgs Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons PR145 (1966) 1156
9 T. W. B. Kibble Symmetry breaking in non-Abelian gauge theories PR155 (1967) 1554
10 T. D. Lee A theory of spontaneous $ \mathrm{T} $ violation PRD 8 (1973) 1226
11 P. Fayet A gauge theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions with spontaneous parity breaking NPB 78 (1974) 14
12 N. Craig and S. Thomas Exclusive Signals of an Extended Higgs Sector JHEP 11 (2012) 083 1207.4835
13 G. C. Branco et al. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models PR 516 (2012) 1 1106.0034
14 W. Konetschny and W. Kummer Nonconservation of total lepton number with scalar bosons PLB 70 (1977) 433
15 M. Magg and C. Wetterich Neutrino mass problem and gauge hierarchy PLB 94 (1980) 61
16 T. P. Cheng and L.-F. Li Neutrino masses, mixings, and oscillations in SU(2)$ \times $U(1) models of electroweak interactions PRD 22 (1980) 2860
17 J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle Neutrino masses in SU(2)$ {\bigotimes} $U(1) theories PRD 22 (1980) 2227
18 C. Englert, E. Re, and M. Spannowsky Triplet Higgs boson collider phenomenology after the LHC PRD 87 (2013) 095014 1302.6505
19 C. Englert, E. Re, and M. Spannowsky Pinning down Higgs triplets at the LHC PRD 88 (2013) 035024 1306.6228
20 H. Georgi and M. Machacek Doubly charged Higgs bosons NPB 262 (1985) 463
21 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2016 data-taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
22 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
23 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002 CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
24 CMS Collaboration The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
25 CMS Collaboration Measurements of production cross sections of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 809 (2020) CMS-SMP-19-012
2005.01173
26 CMS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons produced via vector boson fusion and decaying into a pair of $ \mathrm{W} $ and $ \mathrm{Z} $ bosons using $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=13\text{}\text{}\mathrm{TeV} $ PRL 119 (2017) 141802 CMS-HIG-16-027
1705.02942
27 CMS Collaboration Observation of electroweak production of same-sign W boson pairs in the two jet and two same-sign lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 120 (2018) 081801 CMS-SMP-17-004
1709.05822
28 CMS Collaboration Measurement of electroweak WZ boson production and search for new physics in WZ + two jets events in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 795 (2019) 281 CMS-SMP-18-001
1901.04060
29 ATLAS Collaboration Search for a charged Higgs boson produced in the vector-boson fusion mode with decay $ {\mathrm{H}}^\pm\to{\mathrm{W}}^\pm {\mathrm{Z}} $ using pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=8\text{}\mathrm{TeV} $ with the ATLAS experiment PRL 114 (2015) 231801 1503.04233
30 CMS Collaboration Search for anomalous electroweak production of vector boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV PLB 798 (2019) 134985 CMS-SMP-18-006
1905.07445
31 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
32 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
33 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
34 M. Zaro and H. Logan Recommendations for the interpretation of LHC searches for $ \mathrm{H}_5^0 $, $ \mathrm{H}_5^{\pm} $, and $ \mathrm{H}_5^{\pm\pm} $ in vector boson fusion with decays to vector boson pairs LHCHXSWG-2015-001
35 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
36 M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev, and M. Wiesemann $ \mathrm{W}^{\pm}\mathrm{Z} $ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD PLB 761 (2016) 179 1604.08576
37 B. Biedermann, A. Denner, and M. Pellen Large electroweak corrections to vector boson scattering at the Large Hadron Collider PRL 118 (2017) 261801 1611.02951
38 B. Biedermann, A. Denner, and M. Pellen Complete NLO corrections to W$ ^{+} $W$ ^{+} $ scattering and its irreducible background at the LHC JHEP 10 (2017) 124 1708.00268
39 A. Denner et al. QCD and electroweak corrections to WZ scattering at the LHC JHEP 06 (2019) 067 1904.00882
40 S. Frixione and B. R. Webber Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations JHEP 06 (2002) 029 hep-ph/0204244
41 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
42 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
43 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 07 (2008) 060 0805.4802
44 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
45 T. Sjostrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
46 R. D. Ball et al. Parton distributions with LHC data NPB 867 (2013) 244 1207.1303
47 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
48 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
49 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
50 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
51 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
52 \GEANTfour Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
53 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
54 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
55 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
56 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
57 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
58 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
59 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
60 CMS Collaboration Reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ lepton decays to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ at CMS JINST 11 (2016) P01019 CMS-TAU-14-001
1510.07488
61 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
62 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC Submitted to JHEP CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
63 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
64 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying to a W boson pair in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 791 (2019) 96 CMS-HIG-16-042
1806.05246
65 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in cosmic-ray events JINST 5 (2010) T03022 CMS-CFT-09-014
0911.4994
66 CMS Collaboration Performance of the reconstruction and identification of high-momentum muons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P02027 CMS-MUO-17-001
1912.03516
67 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon trigger system in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Submitted to JINST CMS-MUO-19-001
2102.04790
68 Particle Data Group, P. A. Zyla et al. Review of particle physics Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2020 (2020) 083C01
69 D. L. Rainwater, R. Szalapski, and D. Zeppenfeld Probing color singlet exchange in $ Z $ + two jet events at the CERN LHC PRD 54 (1996) 6680 hep-ph/9605444
70 CMS Collaboration Study of vector boson scattering and search for new physics in events with two same-sign leptons and two jets PRL 114 (2015) 051801 CMS-SMP-13-015
1410.6315
71 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
72 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
73 CMS Collaboration Measurements of differential Z boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 12 (2019) 061 CMS-SMP-17-010
1909.04133
74 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
75 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution performance with 13 TeV data collected by CMS in 2016-2018 CDS
76 S. Catani, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, and P. Nason Soft gluon resummation for Higgs boson production at hadron colliders JHEP 07 (2003) 028 hep-ph/0306211
77 M. Cacciari et al. The $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ cross section at $ 1.8 $ TeV and $ 1.96 $ TeV: a study of the systematics due to parton densities and scale dependence JHEP 04 (2004) 068 hep-ph/0303085
78 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
79 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
80 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the CL$ _{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
81 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 ATL-PHYS-PUB 2011-11, CMS NOTE 2011/005
82 CMS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons produced in vector boson fusion processes and decaying into vector boson pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV 2021 HEPData record
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN