CMS-EXO-20-005 ; CERN-EP-2020-173 | ||
Search for dark photons in Higgs boson production via vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | ||
CMS Collaboration | ||
29 September 2020 | ||
JHEP 03 (2021) 011 | ||
Abstract: A search is presented for a Higgs boson that is produced via vector boson fusion and that decays to an undetected particle and an isolated photon. The search is performed by the CMS Collaboration at the LHC, using a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 130 fb$^{-1}$, recorded at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV in 2016-2018. No significant excess of events above the expectation from the standard model background is found. The results are interpreted in the context of a theoretical model in which the undetected particle is a massless dark photon. An upper limit is set on the product of the cross section for production via vector boson fusion and the branching fraction for such a Higgs boson decay, as a function of the Higgs boson mass. For a Higgs boson mass of 125 GeV, assuming the standard model production rates, the observed (expected) 95% confidence level upper limit on the branching fraction is 3.4 (2.7)%. This is the first search for such decays in the vector boson fusion channel. | ||
Links: e-print arXiv:2009.14009 [hep-ex] (PDF) ; CDS record ; inSPIRE record ; CADI line (restricted) ; |
Figures & Tables | Summary | Additional Figures | References | CMS Publications |
---|
Figures | |
png pdf |
Figure 1:
A Feynman diagram for the VBF production of the $\mathrm{q} \mathrm{q} \mathrm{H} (\gamma \gamma _\mathrm {D})$ final state. |
png pdf |
Figure 2:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distributions from the simultaneous fit in the $ \gamma $+jets (upper left), $ {\mathrm{Z} (\ell \bar{\ell})+\gamma} $ (upper right), and $ {\mathrm{W} (\ell \nu)+\gamma} $ (lower) CRs. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The light green line, illustrating the possible contribution expected from inclusive SM Higgs boson production, assumes a branching fraction of 5% for $\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma $ decays. The lower panel in the figures shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-a:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distributions from the simultaneous fit in the $ \gamma $+jets CR. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The light green line, illustrating the possible contribution expected from inclusive SM Higgs boson production, assumes a branching fraction of 5% for $\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma $ decays. The lower panel shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-b:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distributions from the simultaneous fit in the $ {\mathrm{Z} (\ell \bar{\ell})+\gamma} $ CR. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The light green line, illustrating the possible contribution expected from inclusive SM Higgs boson production, assumes a branching fraction of 5% for $\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma $ decays. The lower panel shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-c:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distributions from the simultaneous fit in the $ {\mathrm{W} (\ell \nu)+\gamma} $ CR. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The light green line, illustrating the possible contribution expected from inclusive SM Higgs boson production, assumes a branching fraction of 5% for $\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma $ decays. The lower panel shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Figure 3:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distributions from the simultaneous fit for events with $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} < $ 1500 GeV in the $ {\mathrm{W} (\mathrm{e} \nu)}$+jets CRs (upper left), for events with $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} \geq $ 1500 GeV in the $ {\mathrm{W} (\mathrm{e} \nu)}$+jets CRs (upper right), for events with $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} < $ 1500 GeV in the SRs (lower left), and for events with $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} \geq $ 1500 GeV in the SRs (lower right). The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The light green line, illustrating the possible contribution expected from inclusive SM Higgs boson production, assumes a branching fraction of 5% for $\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma $ decays. The lower panel in the figures shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Figure 3-a:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution from the simultaneous fit for events with $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} < $ 1500 GeV in the $ {\mathrm{W} (\mathrm{e} \nu)}$+jets CRs. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The light green line, illustrating the possible contribution expected from inclusive SM Higgs boson production, assumes a branching fraction of 5% for $\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma $ decays. The lower panel shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Figure 3-b:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution from the simultaneous fit for events with $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} \geq $ 1500 GeV in the $ {\mathrm{W} (\mathrm{e} \nu)}$+jets CRs. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The light green line, illustrating the possible contribution expected from inclusive SM Higgs boson production, assumes a branching fraction of 5% for $\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma $ decays. The lower panel shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Figure 3-c:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution from the simultaneous fit for events with $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} < $ 1500 GeV in the SRs. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The light green line, illustrating the possible contribution expected from inclusive SM Higgs boson production, assumes a branching fraction of 5% for $\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma $ decays. The lower panel shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Figure 3-d:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution from the simultaneous fit for events with $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} \geq $ 1500 GeV in the SRs. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The light green line, illustrating the possible contribution expected from inclusive SM Higgs boson production, assumes a branching fraction of 5% for $\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma $ decays. The lower panel shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Figure 4:
Expected and observed upper limits at 95% $ CL $ on the product of $ {\sigma _{\text {VBF}}} $ and $ \mathcal {B}(\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma) $ as a function of $m_{\mathrm{H}}$. The dot-dashed line shows the predicted signal corresponding to $0.05 {\sigma _{\text {VBF}}} $, assuming SM couplings. A linear interpolation is performed between the values obtained for the probed $m_{\mathrm{H}}$ values. |
Tables | |
png pdf |
Table 1:
Summary of the selection criteria in the SR, depending on the trigger path and data-taking year. Rows with a single entry indicate that the same requirement is applied for all data-taking years and trigger paths. |
png pdf |
Table 2:
Summary of the $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ binning choice in the SRs and CRs. |
png pdf |
Table 3:
Summary of the uncertainties in the fitted signal cross section in fb for $m_{\mathrm{H}} = $ 125 GeV assuming the presence of a signal ($\sigma = $ 0.05$ {\sigma _{\text {SM}}} $) and the absence of a signal ($\sigma =$ 0). |
png pdf |
Table 4:
Data, expected backgrounds, and estimated signal in the different regions. The expected background yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit assuming background-only in the different regions. The combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties is shown. The illustrative signal yield assumes a production cross section of 0.05$ {\sigma _{\text {SM}}} $. All data-taking periods and trigger paths are combined together for each region. |
png pdf |
Table 5:
Observed and expected 95% CL limits at $m_{\mathrm{H}} = $ 125 GeV on $ \mathcal {B}(\mathrm{H} \to $ inv.+$\gamma) $ for the VBF category, $\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{H} $ category, and their combination. |
Summary |
A search has been presented for a Higgs boson that is produced via vector boson fusion (VBF) and that decays to an undetected particle and a photon. This is the first analysis for such decays in the VBF channel. The search has been performed by the CMS Collaboration using a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 130 fb$^{-1}$ recorded at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV in 2016-2018. No significant excess of events above the expectation from the standard model background is found. The results are used to place limits on the product of the signal cross section ${\sigma_{\text{VBF}}} $ for VBF production and the branching fraction for such decays of the Higgs boson, in the context of a theoretical model where the undetected particle is a massless dark photon. Allowing for deviations from standard model VBF production, the upper limit on the product of ${\sigma_{\text{VBF}}} $ and $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to $ inv$+\gamma) $ ranges from $\approx$160 to $\approx$2 fb, for $m_{\mathrm{H}}$ from 125 GeV to 1000 GeV. The observed (expected) upper limit at 95% confidence level at $m_{\mathrm{H}} = $ 125 GeV assuming standard model production rates on ${\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\text{inv.}+\gamma)} $ is 3.4 (2.7)% for this channel. Combining with an existing analysis targeting associated Z boson production, and assuming the standard model rates, the observed (expected) upper limit at 95% confidence level at $m_{\mathrm{H}} = $ 125 GeV on ${\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}\to\text{inv.}+\gamma)} $ is 2.9 (2.1)%. |
Additional Figures | |
png pdf |
Additional Figure 1:
The $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ distribution in the $ {{\mathrm {W}}({\mathrm {e}} {\nu})}$+jets control region. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The possible signal contamination is negligible. The lower panel in the figure shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Additional Figure 2:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution in the $ {{\gamma} }$+jets control region. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The possible signal contamination is negligible. The lower panel in the figure shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Additional Figure 3:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution in the $ {{\mathrm {Z}} ({\mu} ^+ {\mu} ^-)+ {\gamma}} $ control region. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The lower panel in the figure shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
png pdf |
Additional Figure 4:
The $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution in the $ {{\mathrm {W}}({\mu} {\nu})+ {\gamma}} $ control region. The category other background includes contributions from Z+jets, nonprompt, top quark, VV, and VVV processes. Overflow events are included in the last bin. The shaded bands represent the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields. The lower panel in the figure shows a per-bin ratio of the data yield and the background expectation. The shaded band corresponds to the combined systematic and statistical uncertainty in the background expectation. |
References | ||||
1 | ATLAS Collaboration | Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC | PLB 716 (2012) 1 | 1207.7214 |
2 | CMS Collaboration | Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC | PLB 716 (2012) 30 | CMS-HIG-12-028 1207.7235 |
3 | CMS Collaboration | Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV | JHEP 06 (2013) 081 | CMS-HIG-12-036 1303.4571 |
4 | D. Ghosh et al. | Looking for an invisible Higgs signal at the LHC | PLB 725 (2013) 344 | 1211.7015 |
5 | S. P. Martin and J. D. Wells | Motivation and detectability of an invisibly decaying Higgs boson at the Fermilab Tevatron | PRD 60 (1999) 035006 | hep-ph/9903259 |
6 | Y. Bai, P. Draper, and J. Shelton | Measuring the invisible Higgs width at the 7 and 8 TeV LHC | JHEP 07 (2012) 192 | 1112.4496 |
7 | D. Curtin et al. | Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson | PRD 90 (2014) 075004 | 1312.4992 |
8 | ATLAS and CMS Collaborations | Combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments | PRL 114 (2015) 191803 | 1503.07589 |
9 | CMS Collaboration | Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | JHEP 11 (2017) 047 | CMS-HIG-16-041 1706.09936 |
10 | ATLAS and CMS Collaborations | Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV | JHEP 08 (2016) 045 | 1606.02266 |
11 | CMS Collaboration | Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | EPJC 79 (2019) 421 | CMS-HIG-17-031 1809.10733 |
12 | A. Djouadi and M. Drees | Higgs boson decays into light gravitinos | PLB 407 (1997) 243 | hep-ph/9703452 |
13 | C. Petersson, A. Romagnoni, and R. Torre | Higgs decay with monophoton + $ {\not\!\!E_T} $ signature from low scale supersymmetry breaking | JHEP 10 (2012) 016 | 1203.4563 |
14 | E. Gabrielli and M. Raidal | Exponentially spread dynamical Yukawa couplings from nonperturbative chiral symmetry breaking in the dark sector | PRD 89 (2014) 015008 | 1310.1090 |
15 | E. Gabrielli, M. Heikinheimo, B. Mele, and M. Raidal | Dark photons and resonant monophoton signatures in Higgs boson decays at the LHC | PRD 90 (2014) 055032 | 1405.5196 |
16 | S. Biswas, E. Gabrielli, M. Heikinheimo, and B. Mele | Dark-photon searches via Higgs-boson production at the LHC | PRD 93 (2016) 093011 | 1603.01377 |
17 | S. Biswas, E. Gabrielli, M. Heikinheimo, and B. Mele | Searching for massless dark-photons at the LHC via Higgs boson production | in Proceedings, 2017 European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics (EPS-HEP 2017): Venice, Italy, July 5-12, 2017, volume EPS-HEP2017, p. 315 2017 | |
18 | D. de Florian et al. | Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector | CERN-2017-002-M | 1610.07922 |
19 | CMS Collaboration | Search for exotic decays of a Higgs boson into undetectable particles and one or more photons | PLB 753 (2016) 363 | CMS-HIG-14-025 1507.00359 |
20 | CMS Collaboration | Search for dark photons in decays of Higgs bosons produced in association with Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | JHEP 10 (2019) 139 | CMS-EXO-19-007 1908.02699 |
21 | CMS Collaboration | The CMS trigger system | JINST 12 (2017) P01020 | CMS-TRG-12-001 1609.02366 |
22 | CMS Collaboration | The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC | JINST 3 (2008) S08004 | CMS-00-001 |
23 | S. Frixione and B. R. Webber | Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations | JHEP 06 (2002) 029 | hep-ph/0204244 |
24 | P. Nason | A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms | JHEP 11 (2004) 040 | hep-ph/0409146 |
25 | S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari | Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method | JHEP 11 (2007) 070 | 0709.2092 |
26 | S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re | NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG | JHEP 07 (2008) 060 | 0805.4802 |
27 | S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re | A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX | JHEP 06 (2010) 043 | 1002.2581 |
28 | S. Heinemeyer et al. | Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties | CERN-2013-004 | 1307.1347 |
29 | T. Sjostrand et al. | An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 | CPC 191 (2015) 159 | 1410.3012 |
30 | J. Alwall et al. | The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations | JHEP 07 (2014) 079 | 1405.0301 |
31 | J. Alwall et al. | Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions | EPJC 53 (2008) 473 | 0706.2569 |
32 | R. Frederix and S. Frixione | Merging meets matching in MC@NLO | JHEP 12 (2012) 061 | 1209.6215 |
33 | NNPDF Collaboration | Parton distributions for the LHC Run II | JHEP 04 (2015) 040 | 1410.8849 |
34 | NNPDF Collaboration | Parton distributions from high-precision collider data | EPJC 77 (2017) 663 | 1706.00428 |
35 | P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo | Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune | EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 | 1404.5630 |
36 | CMS Collaboration | Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements | EPJC 76 (2016) 155 | CMS-GEN-14-001 1512.00815 |
37 | CMS Collaboration | Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements | EPJC 80 (2020) 4 | CMS-GEN-17-001 1903.12179 |
38 | \GEANTfour Collaboration | GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit | NIMA 506 (2003) 250 | |
39 | CMS Collaboration | Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector | JINST 12 (2017) P10003 | CMS-PRF-14-001 1706.04965 |
40 | M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez | The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm | JHEP 04 (2008) 063 | 0802.1189 |
41 | CMS Collaboration | Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV | JINST 12 (2017) P02014 | CMS-JME-13-004 1607.03663 |
42 | CMS Collaboration | Jet energy scale and resolution performance with 13 TeV data collected by CMS in 2016-2018 | CDS | |
43 | CMS Collaboration | Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data | Submitted to JINST | CMS-JME-18-001 2003.00503 |
44 | M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez | FastJet user manual | EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 | 1111.6097 |
45 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV | JINST 10 (2015) P02006 | CMS-JME-13-003 1411.0511 |
46 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV | JINST 10 (2015) P06005 | CMS-EGM-13-001 1502.02701 |
47 | CMS Collaboration | Electron and photon performance in CMS with the full 2017 data sample and additional 2016 highlights for the CALOR 2018 Conference | CDS | |
48 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | JINST 13 (2018) P06015 | CMS-MUO-16-001 1804.04528 |
49 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS Detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV | JINST 10 (2015) P08010 | CMS-EGM-14-001 1502.02702 |
50 | CMS Collaboration | Search for new physics in final states with a single photon and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | JHEP 02 (2019) 074 | CMS-EXO-16-053 1810.00196 |
51 | CMS Collaboration | Search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet or a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and transverse momentum imbalance at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | PRD 97 (2018) 092005 | CMS-EXO-16-048 1712.02345 |
52 | D. L. Rainwater, R. Szalapski, and D. Zeppenfeld | Probing color singlet exchange in $ Z $ + two jet events at the CERN LHC | PRD 54 (1996) 6680 | hep-ph/9605444 |
53 | G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells | Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics | EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 | 1007.1727 |
54 | CMS Collaboration | CMS luminosity measurement for the 2016 data-taking period | CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 | CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 |
55 | CMS Collaboration | CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004 | CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004 |
56 | CMS Collaboration | CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV | CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002 | CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002 |
57 | ATLAS Collaboration | Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC | PRL 117 (2016) 182002 | 1606.02625 |
58 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV | JHEP 07 (2018) 161 | CMS-FSQ-15-005 1802.02613 |
59 | S. Catani, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, and P. Nason | Soft gluon resummation for Higgs boson production at hadron colliders | JHEP 07 (2003) 028 | hep-ph/0306211 |
60 | M. Cacciari et al. | The $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ cross section at $ 1.8 $ TeV and $ 1.96 $ TeV: a study of the systematics due to parton densities and scale dependence | JHEP 04 (2004) 068 | hep-ph/0303085 |
61 | J. Butterworth et al. | PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC run II | JPG 43 (2016) 023001 | 1510.03865 |
62 | A. L. Read | Presentation of search results: the CLs technique | JPG 28 (2002) 2693 | |
63 | T. Junk | Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics | NIMA 434 (1999) 435 | hep-ex/9902006 |
64 | ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, LHC Higgs Combination Group | Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 | ATL-PHYS-PUB 2011-11, CMS NOTE 2011/005, CERN | |
65 | S. Baker and R. D. Cousins | Clarification of the Use of Chi Square and Likelihood Functions in Fits to Histograms | NIM221 (1984) 437 |
Compact Muon Solenoid LHC, CERN |