CMS-PAS-SMP-22-011

CMS-PAS-SMP-22-011
Study of vector boson scattering in the semileptonic final state and search for anomalous quartic gauge couplings from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV
CMS Collaboration
3 March 2025

Abstract: A measurement of the electroweak production of ZV (V = W, Z) boson pairs associated with two jets in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV is presented. The analysis targets final states with two isolated electrons or muons from Z decays and three to four jets, depending on the momentum of the vector boson that decays into quarks. The data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb $^{-1}$ , were collected at the CERN LHC with the CMS detector during the 2016--2018 data-taking period. The cross section is measured in a fiducial region characterized by a large invariant mass and pseudorapidity gap between the two forward jets. The electroweak production of ZV in association with two jets is measured with an observed (expected) significance of 1.3 (1.8) standard deviations. Constraints are also placed on effective field theory parameters that describe anomalous electroweak production of WW, WZ, and ZZ boson pair pairs in association with two jets, combining the ZV and WV semileptonic events. Stringent limits are set on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in terms of dimension-8 operators.
Links: CDS record (PDF) ; CADI line (restricted) ;

Figures & Tables	Summary	References	CMS Publications

Figures
png pdf	Figure 1: An illustrative Feynman diagram for the VBS process contributing to the EW production of events containing a vector boson that decays hadronically (V=W, Z), W or Z boson that decays into leptons, and two forward jets. New physics (represented by a black circle) in the EW sector can modify the VZ production.
png pdf	Figure 2: Distributions of sub-leading VBS jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of for the ZV channel for the resolved b-tag (left) and the resolved b-veto (right) categories. The post-fit VBS EW ZV signal is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 2-a: Distributions of sub-leading VBS jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of for the ZV channel for the resolved b-tag (left) and the resolved b-veto (right) categories. The post-fit VBS EW ZV signal is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 2-b: Distributions of sub-leading VBS jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of for the ZV channel for the resolved b-tag (left) and the resolved b-veto (right) categories. The post-fit VBS EW ZV signal is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 3: Distributions of DNN score for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of for the ZV channel for the b-tag (left) and the b-veto (right) channels, for the boosted (resolved) category in the first (second) row. The post-fit VBS EW ZV signal is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 3-a: Distributions of DNN score for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of for the ZV channel for the b-tag (left) and the b-veto (right) channels, for the boosted (resolved) category in the first (second) row. The post-fit VBS EW ZV signal is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 3-b: Distributions of DNN score for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of for the ZV channel for the b-tag (left) and the b-veto (right) channels, for the boosted (resolved) category in the first (second) row. The post-fit VBS EW ZV signal is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 3-c: Distributions of DNN score for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of for the ZV channel for the b-tag (left) and the b-veto (right) channels, for the boosted (resolved) category in the first (second) row. The post-fit VBS EW ZV signal is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 3-d: Distributions of DNN score for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of for the ZV channel for the b-tag (left) and the b-veto (right) channels, for the boosted (resolved) category in the first (second) row. The post-fit VBS EW ZV signal is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 4: Distributions of $\textit{M}_{\text{ZV}}$ for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of the boosted b-tag (left) and the boosted b-veto (right) channels. The template for one signal hypothesis is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 4-a: Distributions of $\textit{M}_{\text{ZV}}$ for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of the boosted b-tag (left) and the boosted b-veto (right) channels. The template for one signal hypothesis is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 4-b: Distributions of $\textit{M}_{\text{ZV}}$ for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of the boosted b-tag (left) and the boosted b-veto (right) channels. The template for one signal hypothesis is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 5: Distributions of $\textit{M}_{\text{WV}}$ for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of the electron (left) and the muon (right) channels. The template for one signal hypothesis is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 5-a: Distributions of $\textit{M}_{\text{WV}}$ for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of the electron (left) and the muon (right) channels. The template for one signal hypothesis is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.
png pdf	Figure 5-b: Distributions of $\textit{M}_{\text{WV}}$ for the data, and the post-fit backgrounds (stacked histograms), in the SRs of the electron (left) and the muon (right) channels. The template for one signal hypothesis is shown overlaid as a red solid line. The overflow is included in the last bin. The lower panel shows ratios of the data to the pre-fit background prediction and post-fit background yield as red open squares and blue points, respectively. The gray band in the middle panels indicates the systematic component of the post-fit background uncertainty.

Tables
png pdf	Table 1: Definitions of the SRs and the CRs for the VBS ZV analysis for both resolved and boosted categories.
png pdf	Table 2: Variables used as input to the DNN for the resolved and boosted models in the two b-tagged categories. The variables used in each category are labeled by a number representing their rank in the model quantified according to the SHAP algorithm [76].
png pdf	Table 3: The impact of each systematic uncertainty, together with the impact of the data statistical uncertainty, on the signal strength $\mu$ , as extracted from the fit to measure the EW ZV VBS signal with the DNN output distributions. Upper and lower uncertainties are given for the various sources. The theory uncertainty includes contributions from both the signal and backgrounds.
png pdf	Table 4: Observed and expected 95% CL intervals on the parameters on the parameters of the quartic operators in WV and ZV channels. The last two columns show the observed and expected limits for the combination of the WV and ZV channels.

Summary

A study of the electroweak production of ZV (V=W, Z) boson pairs in semi-leptonic decays in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV is performed. The analysis uses a sample of proton-proton collisions recorded by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC in 2106--2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb

$^{-1}$ . The cross section is measured in a fiducial region characterized by large invariant mass and pseudorapidity gap of the two forward jets using feed-forward deep neural network (DNN) discriminators. The measured cross section for electroweak ZV VBS process is 0.63

$^{+0.53}_{-0.51}$ times the standard model prediction. The ZV and WV semi-leptonic events are combined and constraints are also reported on coefficients of new operators from an effective field theory sensitive to an anomalous electroweak production of WW, WZ, and ZZ boson pairs in association with two jets. Stringent limits are set on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in terms of dimension-8 operators.

References
1	D. R. Green, P. Meade, and M.-A. Pleier	Multiboson interactions at the LHC	Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 035008	1610.07572
2	C. F. Anders et al.	Vector boson scattering: Recent experimental and theory developments	Rev. Phys. 3 (2018) 44	1801.04203
3	ATLAS Collaboration	Search for anomalous electroweak production of $WW/WZ$ in association with a high-mass dijet system in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector	PRD 95 (2017) 032001	1609.05122
4	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of vector boson scattering and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings from events with four leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	PLB 774 (2017) 682	CMS-SMP-17-006 1708.02812
5	CMS Collaboration Collaboration	Search for anomalous electroweak production of WW/WZ/ZZ boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV	Technical Report, CERN, Geneva, 2018 CMS-PAS-SMP-18-006	CMS-PAS-SMP-18-006
6	M. Gallinaro et al.	Beyond the Standard Model in vector boson scattering signatures	in International Workshop on BSM models in Vector Boson Scattering processes	2005.09889
7	ATLAS Collaboration	Observation of electroweak production of W $^{+}$ W $^{-}$ in association with jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	JHEP 07 (2024) 254	2403.04869
8	ATLAS Collaboration	Observation of electroweak $W^{\pm}Z$ boson pair production in association with two jets in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	PLB 793 (2019) 469	1812.09740
9	CMS Collaboration	Measurements of production cross sections of polarized same-sign W boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV	PLB 812 (2021) 136018	CMS-SMP-20-006 2009.09429
10	CMS Collaboration	Evidence for electroweak production of four charged leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt {s}$ = 13 TeV	PLB 812 (2021) 135992	CMS-SMP-20-001 2008.07013
11	CMS Collaboration	Measurements of production cross sections of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV	PLB 809 (2020) 135710	CMS-SMP-19-012 2005.01173
12	ATLAS Collaboration	Observation of electroweak production of two jets and a $Z$ -boson pair with the ATLAS detector at the LHC	Submitted to Nature Physics, 2020	2004.10612
13	CMS Collaboration	Observation of electroweak W $^+$ W $^-$ pair production in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	PLB 841 (2023) 137495	CMS-SMP-21-001 2205.05711
14	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement and interpretation of same-sign W boson pair production in association with two jets in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	JHEP 04 (2024) 026	2312.00420
15	CMS Collaboration	Observation of electroweak production of same-sign W boson pairs in the two jet and two same-sign lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV	Technical Report , CERN, Geneva, 2017 CMS-PAS-SMP-17-004	CMS-PAS-SMP-17-004
16	ATLAS Collaboration	Observation of electroweak production of a same-sign $W$ boson pair in association with two jets in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	Technical Report ATLAS-CONF-2018-030, CERN, Geneva, Jul, 2018
17	ATLAS Collaboration	Search for the electroweak diboson production in association with a high-mass dijet system in semileptonic final states in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	PRD 100 (2019) 032007	1905.07714
18	CMS Collaboration	Search for anomalous electroweak production of vector boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV	PLB 798 (2019) 134985	CMS-SMP-18-006 1905.07445
19	CMS Collaboration	Evidence for WW/WZ vector boson scattering in the decay channel \ensuremath\ell\ensuremath\nuqq produced in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	PLB 834 (2022) 137438	CMS-SMP-20-013 2112.05259
20	ATLAS Collaboration	Combined effective field theory interpretation of Higgs boson and weak boson production and decay with ATLAS data and electroweak precision observables	technical report, 2022
21	ATLAS Collaboration	Top EFT summary plots April 2024	technical report, 2024
22	R. Covarelli, M. Pellen, and M. Zaro	Vector-boson scattering at the LHC: Unraveling the electroweak sector	Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36 (2021) 2130009	2102.10991
23	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of W $^\pm\gamma$ differential cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and effective field theory constraints	PRD 105 (2022) 052003	CMS-SMP-20-005 2111.13948
24	CMS Collaboration	Observation of $\gamma\gamma\to\tau\tau$ in proton-proton collisions and limits on the anomalous electromagnetic moments of the $\tau$ lepton	Rept. Prog. Phys. 87 (2024) 107801	CMS-SMP-23-005 2406.03975
25	W. Buchm ü ller and D. Wyler	Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavour conservation	NPB 268 (1986) 621
26	B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzy\'nski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek	Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian	JHEP 10 (2010) 085	1008.4884
27	O. J. P. Éboli and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia	Classifying the bosonic quartic couplings	PRD 93 (2016) 093013	1604.03555
28	A. Falkowski et al.	Anomalous triple gauge couplings in the effective field theory approach at the LHC	JHEP 02 (2017) 115	1609.06312
29	G. Durieux et al.	LHC EFT WG Note: Basis for anomalous quartic gauge couplings		2411.02483
30	E. d. S. Almeida, O. J. P. Éboli, and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia	Unitarity constraints on anomalous quartic couplings	PRD 101 (2020) 113003	2004.05174
31	CMS Collaboration	The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 3 (2008) 8004
32	CMS Collaboration	Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker	JINST 9 (2014) 10009	CMS-TRK-11-001 1405.6569
33	CMS Tracker Group Collaboration	The CMS phase-1 pixel detector upgrade	JINST 16 (2021) P02027	2012.14304
34	CMS Collaboration	Track impact parameter resolution for the full pseudo rapidity coverage in the 2017 dataset with the CMS phase-1 pixel detector	CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2020-049, 2020 CDS
35	CMS Collaboration	The CMS trigger system	JINST 12 (2017) P01020	CMS-TRG-12-001 1609.02366
36	J. Alwall et al.	The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations	JHEP 07 (2014) 079	1405.0301
37	O. Mattelaer	On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLO accuracy	EPJC 76 (2016) 674	1607.00763
38	S. Frixione and B. R. Webber	Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations	JHEP 06 (2002) 029	hep-ph/0204244
39	P. Nason	A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms	JHEP 11 (2004) 040	hep-ph/0409146
40	S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari	Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method	JHEP 11 (2007) 070	0709.2092
41	S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re	NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG	JHEP 07 (2008) 060	0805.4802
42	S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re	A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX	JHEP 06 (2010) 043	1002.2581
43	J. Alwall et al.	Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions	EPJC 53 (2008) 473	0706.2569
44	J. Campbell and T. Neumann	Precision phenomenology with MCFM	JHEP 12 (2019) 034	1909.09117
45	J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and W. T. Giele	A multi-threaded version of MCFM	EPJC 75 (2015) 246	1503.06182
46	J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams	Vector boson pair production at the LHC	JHEP 07 (2011) 018	1105.0020
47	J. M. Campell and R. K. Ellis	Update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders	PRD 60 (1999) 113006	hep-ph/9905386
48	M. Czakon et al.	Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW	JHEP 10 (2017) 186	1705.04105
49	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton + jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV	PRD 95 (2017) 092001	CMS-TOP-16-008 1610.04191
50	CMS Collaboration	Measurements of differential Z boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV	JHEP 12 (2019) 061	CMS-SMP-17-010 1909.04133
51	NNPDF Collaboration	Parton distributions for the LHC Run II	JHEP 04 (2015) 040	1410.8849
52	NNPDF Collaboration	Parton distributions from high-precision collider data	EPJC 77 (2017) 663	1706.00428
53	T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands	A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1	Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852	0710.3820
54	CMS Collaboration	Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements	EPJC 76 (2016) 155	CMS-GEN-14-001 1512.00815
55	CMS Collaboration	Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements	EPJC 80 (2020) 4	CMS-GEN-17-001 1903.12179
56	A. Ballestrero et al.	Precise predictions for same-sign W-boson scattering at the LHC	EPJC 78 (2018) 671	1803.07943
57	B. J ä ger et al.	Parton-shower effects in Higgs production via vector-boson fusion	EPJC 80 (2020) 756	2003.12435
58	GEANT4 Collaboration	GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit	NIMA 506 (2003) 250
59	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	The anti- $k_t$ jet clustering algorithm	JHEP 04 (2008) 063	0802.1189
60	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	FastJet User Manual	EPJC 72 (2012) 1896	1111.6097
61	M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam	Pileup subtraction using jet areas	PLB 659 (2008) 119	0707.1378
62	CMS Collaboration	Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data	no.~09, P09018, 2020 JINST 15 (2020)	CMS-JME-18-001 2003.00503
63	CMS Collaboration	Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid	CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015 CDS
64	CMS Collaboration	Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018) P05011	CMS-BTV-16-002 1712.07158
65	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the single top quark and antiquark production cross sections in the $t$ channel and their ratio in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	PLB 800 (2020) 135042	CMS-TOP-17-011 1812.10514
66	CMS Collaboration	Identification techniques for highly boosted W bosons that decay into hadrons	JHEP 12 (2014) 017	CMS-JME-13-006 1410.4227
67	D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran	Pileup per particle identification	JHEP 10 (2014) 059	1407.6013
68	M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani, and G. P. Salam	Towards an understanding of jet substructure	JHEP 09 (2013) 029	1307.0007
69	A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler	Soft drop	JHEP 05 (2014) 146	1402.2657
70	J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg	Identifying boosted objects with $N$ -subjettiness	JHEP 03 (2011) 015	1011.2268
71	CMS Collaboration	Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 16 (2021) P05014	CMS-EGM-17-001 2012.06888
72	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018) P06015	CMS-MUO-16-001 1804.04528
73	Particle Data Group Collaboration	Review of particle physics	PRD 110 (2024) 030001
74	J. M. Lindert et al.	Precise predictions for $V+$ jets dark matter backgrounds	EPJC 77 (2017) 829	1705.04664
75	F. Chollet et al.	Keras	link
76	S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee	A unified approach to interpreting model predictions	in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS'17, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2017	1705.07874
77	D. L. Rainwater, R. Szalapski, and D. Zeppenfeld	Probing color singlet exchange in $Z$ + 2-jet events at the CERN LHC	PRD 54 (1996) 6680	hep-ph/9605444
78	CMS Collaboration	Performance of quark/gluon discrimination in 8 TeV pp data	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2013 CMS-PAS-JME-13-002	CMS-PAS-JME-13-002
79	CMS Collaboration	Performance of quark/gluon discrimination in 13 TeV data	CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2016-070, 2016 CDS
80	G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells	Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics	EPJC 71 (2011) 1554	1007.1727
81	CMS Collaboration	The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE	Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 8 (2024) 19	CMS-CAT-23-001 2404.06614
82	W. Verkerke and D. P. Kirkby	The RooFit toolkit for data modeling	eConf C0303241 MOLT007, 2003	physics/0306116
83	L. Moneta et al.	The RooStats project	PoS ACAT 057, 2010 link	1009.1003
84	CMS Collaboration	Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS	EPJC 81 (2021) 800	CMS-LUM-17-003 2104.01927
85	CMS Collaboration	CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004	CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
86	CMS Collaboration	CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019 CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002	CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
87	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	JHEP 07 (2018) 161	CMS-FSQ-15-005 1802.02613
88	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	JINST 19 (2024) P09004	CMS-EGM-18-002 2403.15518
89	CMS Collaboration	Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV	JINST 12 (2017) P02014	CMS-JME-13-004 1607.03663
90	A. Kalogeropoulos and J. Alwall	The SysCalc code: A tool to derive theoretical systematic uncertainties		1801.08401
91	J. Rojo	PDF4LHC recommendations for Run II	PoS DIS 018, 2016 link	1606.08243
92	J. S. Conway	Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra	PHYSTAT (2011) 115	1103.0354