CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-TOP-18-002
Measurement of the cross section for $\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}$ production with additional jets and b jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: The cross sections of top quark pair production in association with a pair of jets from bottom quarks ($\sigma_{\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\bar{\mathrm{b}}}$) and in association with a pair of jets from quarks with any flavor or gluons ($\sigma_{\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{jj}}$) and their ratio are measured in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with data collected in 2016 by the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The measurements are performed in the visible phase space in the dilepton and lepton+jets channels separately, by fitting the distribution of the b tagging discriminant variable of the two jets that do not belong to the $\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}$ decay. The $\mathrm{t}\bar{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{jj}$ cross sections in the visible phase space in the dilepton and the lepton+jets channel are measured to be 2.36 $\pm$ 0.02 (stat) $\pm$ 0.20 (syst) pb and 31.0 $\pm$ 0.2 (stat) $\pm$ 2.9 (syst) pb, respectively. The measured cross section ratio in the visible phase space is 0.017 $\pm$ 0.001 (stat) $\pm$ 0.001(syst) for the dilepton channel, and 0.020 $\pm$ 0.001 (stat) $\pm$ 0.001 (syst) for the lepton+jets channel. The results extrapolated to the full phase space are compared with the standard model expectations obtained at next-to-leading order.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
b tagging discriminant distribution for the first (left) and second (right) additional jet for the dilepton (upper) and lepton+jets channels (lower) in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after the event selection. The lower panels display the ratio of the data to the expectations. Gray areas include both statistical and systematic uncertainities.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
b tagging discriminant distribution for the first (left) and second (right) additional jet for the dilepton (upper) and lepton+jets channels (lower) in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after the event selection. The lower panels display the ratio of the data to the expectations. Gray areas include both statistical and systematic uncertainities.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
b tagging discriminant distribution for the first (left) and second (right) additional jet for the dilepton (upper) and lepton+jets channels (lower) in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after the event selection. The lower panels display the ratio of the data to the expectations. Gray areas include both statistical and systematic uncertainities.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
b tagging discriminant distribution for the first (left) and second (right) additional jet for the dilepton (upper) and lepton+jets channels (lower) in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after the event selection. The lower panels display the ratio of the data to the expectations. Gray areas include both statistical and systematic uncertainities.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
b tagging discriminant distribution for the first (left) and second (right) additional jet for the dilepton (upper) and lepton+jets channels (lower) in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after the event selection. The lower panels display the ratio of the data to the expectations. Gray areas include both statistical and systematic uncertainities.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown separately for different flavors of the additional jet: $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ (upper left), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm {j}} $ (upper right), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{c} \mathrm{\bar{c}}} $ (below left) and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {LF}} $ (below right). The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from MC simulation (POWHEG).

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown separately for different flavors of the additional jet: $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ (upper left), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm {j}} $ (upper right), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{c} \mathrm{\bar{c}}} $ (below left) and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {LF}} $ (below right). The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from MC simulation (POWHEG).

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown separately for different flavors of the additional jet: $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ (upper left), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm {j}} $ (upper right), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{c} \mathrm{\bar{c}}} $ (below left) and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {LF}} $ (below right). The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from MC simulation (POWHEG).

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown separately for different flavors of the additional jet: $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ (upper left), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm {j}} $ (upper right), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{c} \mathrm{\bar{c}}} $ (below left) and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {LF}} $ (below right). The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from MC simulation (POWHEG).

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown separately for different flavors of the additional jet: $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ (upper left), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm {j}} $ (upper right), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{c} \mathrm{\bar{c}}} $ (below left) and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {LF}} $ (below right). The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from MC simulation (POWHEG).

png pdf
Figure 3:
b tagging discriminant distribution for the first (left) and the second (right) additional jet for all the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ categories in the lepton+jets channel. The number of entries in each distribution is normalized to unity.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
b tagging discriminant distribution for the first (left) and the second (right) additional jet for all the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ categories in the lepton+jets channel. The number of entries in each distribution is normalized to unity.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
b tagging discriminant distribution for the first (left) and the second (right) additional jet for all the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ categories in the lepton+jets channel. The number of entries in each distribution is normalized to unity.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Results of the simultaneous fit for $R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}$ and ${\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}}$ (denoted by the cross) in the VPS, along with its 68% and 95% CL contours, are shown for the (left) dilepton and (right) lepton+jets channels. The solid circle dot shows the prediction by POWHEG +PYTHIA 8. The uncertainties in the MC prediction are a combination of statistical, $\mu _F/\mu _R$ scale, and PDF components.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Results of the simultaneous fit for $R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}$ and ${\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}}$ (denoted by the cross) in the VPS, along with its 68% and 95% CL contours, are shown for the (left) dilepton and (right) lepton+jets channels. The solid circle dot shows the prediction by POWHEG +PYTHIA 8. The uncertainties in the MC prediction are a combination of statistical, $\mu _F/\mu _R$ scale, and PDF components.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Results of the simultaneous fit for $R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}$ and ${\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}}$ (denoted by the cross) in the VPS, along with its 68% and 95% CL contours, are shown for the (left) dilepton and (right) lepton+jets channels. The solid circle dot shows the prediction by POWHEG +PYTHIA 8. The uncertainties in the MC prediction are a combination of statistical, $\mu _F/\mu _R$ scale, and PDF components.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Summary of the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ cross sections and their ratio for the dilepton channel in the FPS (requiring jet transverse momenta of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 30 GeV) in comparison with the theoretical predictions obtained from POWHEG and MG_aMC@NLO (5FS) interfaced with PYTHIA 8, and POWHEG interfaced with HERWIG++. All the theoretical predictions for $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ processes are normalized to $\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}}^\text { NNLO} = $ 831.76 pb. The uncertainties in the MC predictions are a combination of statistical, $\mu _F/\mu _R$ scale, and PDF components.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Summary of the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ cross sections and their ratio for the lepton+jets channel in the FPS (requiring jet transverse momenta of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 20 GeV) in comparison with the theoretical predictions obtained from POWHEG and MG_aMC@NLO (5FS) interfaced with PYTHIA 8, and POWHEG interfaced with HERWIG++. All the theoretical predictions for $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ processes are normalized to $\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}}^\text {NNLO} = $ 831.76 pb. The previous measurement performed by the CMS Collaboration [21] is also shown with a rhombus marker. The uncertainties in the MC predictions are a combination of statistical, $\mu _F/\mu _R$ scale, and PDF components.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The definition of objects in the visible and full phase space are listed. Details of the particle-level definitions are described in the text. The symbol $\ell $ denotes a lepton ($\mathrm {e}$ or $ \mu $).

png pdf
Table 2:
Expected and observed numbers of events in the dilepton and lepton+jets channel after applying the event selection. The results are given for the different ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $(+jets) categories, the individual sources of background (from MC simulation) normalized to a luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$, and observed in data. The uncertainties quoted for each MC contribution consider all systematic uncertainties described in Section 6.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of the individual contributions to the systematic uncertainty in the $R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}$ and $ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $ measurements for the VPS. The uncertainties are given as relative uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 4:
The measured cross sections $ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}}}} $ and $ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $, and their ratio, for the VPS and FPS, corrected for acceptance and branching fractions. In both phase space definitions, the dilepton channel requires a jet with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 30 GeV, while a jet with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 20 GeV is considered for the lepton+jets channel. The uncertainties in the measurements are split into their statistical and systematic components, while the uncertainties in the MC predictions are a combination of statistical, $\mu _{\rm F}/\mu _{\rm R}$ scale, and PDF components.
Summary
Measurements of the ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ and ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \text{jj}} $ cross sections and their ratio are performed independently in dilepton and lepton+jets final states using a data sample of proton-proton collisions collected at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV by the CMS experiment in 2016, and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Leptons and particle-level jets must be in the experimentally accessible kinematic region. The inclusive ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \text{jj}} $ cross section and the ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ to ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \text{jj}} $ cross section ratio in the visible phase space are measured by means of a binned maximum-likelihood fit to the b tagging discriminant distribution of the additional jets, from which the inclusive ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ cross section measurement is inferred. The cross section ratio and the inclusive ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \text{jj}} $ cross section in the visible phase space are extrapolated to the full phase space after correcting for the detector acceptance.

The inclusive ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \text{jj}} $ cross sections in the visible phase space are measured to be 2.36 $\pm$ 0.20 pb in the dilepton channel and 31.0 $\pm$ 2.9 pb in the lepton+jets channel. The ratio of the ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ to ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \text{jj}} $ cross sections are measured to be 0.017 $\pm$ 0.002 $ and $0.020 $\pm$ 0.002 in the dilepton and the lepton+jets channels, respectively. The treatment of the systematic uncertainties as nuisance parameters in the fit leads to an improvement in the precision compared to previous measurements. The inclusive ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ cross sections and the cross section ratios for both decay channels measured in the full phase space show higher results than the ones from several different Monte Carlo predictions. A higher ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ cross section is also reported in a recent measurement performed by the CMS Collaboration in the fully hadronic final state [22].
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1
2 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30
3 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
4 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying to a W boson pair in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV Submitted to: PL(2018) CMS-HIG-16-042
1806.05246
5 CMS Collaboration Measurements of Higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 2018 (2018) 185
6 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 2017 (2017) 47
7 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the H $ \to $ ZZ$ ^{*}\to4\ell $ and H $ \to\gamma\gamma $ channels with $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector PLB 784 (2018) 345
8 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of Higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel with 36 fb$^{-1}$ of pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 98 (2018) 052005
9 CMS Collaboration Observation of ttH production PRL 120 (2018) 231801
10 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector PLB 784 (2018) 173
11 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}H} $ production in the $ \mathrm{H\rightarrow b\overline{b}} $ decay channel in $ 41.5 \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ of proton-proton collision data at $ \sqrt{s}=13 \mathrm{TeV} $ CMS-PAS-HIG-18-030 CMS-PAS-HIG-18-030
12 G. Bevilacqua and M. Worek On the ratio of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t} b\overline{b}} $ and $ \mathrm{t\overline{t} jj} $ cross sections at the CERN Large Hadron Collider JHEP 07 (2014) 135 1403.2046
13 G. Bevilacqua, M. Czakon, C. G. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek Hadronic top-quark pair production in association with two jets at next-to-leading order QCD PRD 84 (2011) 114017
14 T. Ježo, J. M. Lindert, N. o. Moretti, and S. Pozzorini New NLOPS predictions for $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ + b-jet production at the LHC EPJC 78 (2018) 502 1802.00426
15 A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and S. Pozzorini Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to pp $ \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ + X at the lhc PRL 103 (2009) 012002
16 A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and S. Pozzorini Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to pp $ \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ + X at the LHC JHEP 08 (2008) 108
17 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of fiducial cross-sections for $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ production with one of two additional b-jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016) 11 1508.06868
18 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with additional heavy-flavour jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 04 (2019) 046 1811.12113
19 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the cross section ratio $ \sigma_\mathrm{t \bar{t} b \bar{b}} / \sigma_\mathrm{t \bar{t} jj} $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV PLB 746 (2015) 132 CMS-TOP-13-010
1411.5621
20 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with additional jet activity, including b quark jets, in the dilepton decay channel using pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 379 1510.03072v2
21 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ cross sections in association with b jets and inclusive jets and their ratio using dilepton final states in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 776 (2018) 355 1705.10141v2
22 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ production cross section in the all-jet final state in $ \mathrm{pp} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-18-011 CMS-PAS-TOP-18-011
23 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
24 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
25 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
26 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, P. Nason, and E. Re Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers JHEP 04 (2015) 114 1412.1828
27 T. Sjostrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
28 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
29 S. Dulat et al. New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics PRD 93 (2016) 033006 1506.07443
30 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
31 N. Davidson et al. Universal Interface of TAUOLA Technical and Physics Documentation Computer Physics Communications 183 (2010) 821 1002.0543
32 S. Frixione et al. Single-top hadroproduction in association with a W boson JHEP 07 (2008) 029 0805.3067
33 E. Re Single-top W$ t $-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
34 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
35 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
36 M. Cacciari et al. Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation PLB 710 (2012) 612 1111.5869
37 P. Barnreuther, M. Czakon, and A. Mitov Percent level precision physics at the Tevatron: First genuine NNLO QCD corrections to pp $ \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ + X PRL 109 (2012) 132001 1204.5201
38 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels JHEP 12 (2012) 054 1207.0236
39 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction JHEP 01 (2013) 080 1210.6832
40 M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein, and C. Schwinn Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation NPB 855 (2012) 695 1109.1536
41 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders through $ \mathcal{O}({{\alpha}}_{S}^{4}) $ PRL 110 (2013) 252004
42 N. Kidonakis NNLL threshold resummation for top-pair and single-top production Phys. Part. Nucl. 45 (2014) 714 1210.7813
43 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
44 C. ATLAS, CDF and D. Collaborations First combination of Tevatron and LHC measurements of the top-quark mass CMS-PAS-TOP-13-014, D0-NOTE-6416, FERMILAB-TM-2582- 1403.4427
45 T. Gehrmann et al. W$ ^{+} $W$ ^{-} $ production at hadron colliders in next to next to leading order QCD PRL 113 (2014) 212001 1408.5243
46 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC NPPS 205 (2010) 10 1007.3492
47 J. Allison et al. Geant4 developments and applications IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270
48 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The catchment area of jets JHEP 04 (2008) 005 0802.1188
49 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
50 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
51 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
52 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
53 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
54 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
55 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
56 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} CMS-PAS-PFT-09-001
57 D0 Collaboration Direct measurement of the top quark mass by the D0 Collaboration PRD 58 (1998) 052001
58 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in Pythia 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
59 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for the production of top quark pairs and of additional jets in $ \mathrm{lepton}+\text{jets} $ events from pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV PRD 97 (2018) 112003
60 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
61 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
62 J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands String formation beyond leading colour JHEP 08 (2015) 003 1505.01681
63 S. Argyropoulos and T. Sjostrand Effects of color reconnection on $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ final states at the LHC JHEP 11 (2014) 043 1407.6653
64 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PRL 117 (2016) 182002 1606.02625
65 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN