CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-TOP-18-002 ; CERN-EP-2020-011
Measurement of the cross section for $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production with additional jets and b jets in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
JHEP 07 (2020) 125
Abstract: Measurements of the cross section for the production of top quark pairs in association with a pair of jets from bottom quarks (${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} }} $) and in association with a pair of jets from quarks of any flavor or gluons (${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} }} $) and their ratio are presented. The data were collected in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The measurements are performed in a fiducial phase space, separately in the dilepton and lepton+jets channels, where lepton corresponds to either an electron or a muon. The results for the dilepton and lepton+jets channels, respectively, are ${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} }} = $ 2.36 $\pm$ 0.02 (stat) $\pm$ 0.20 (syst) pb and 31.0 $\pm$ 0.2 (stat) $\pm$ 2.9 (syst) pb, and for the cross section ratio 0.017 $\pm$ 0.001 (stat) $\pm$ 0.001 (syst) and 0.020 $\pm$ 0.001 (stat) $\pm$ 0.001 (syst). The values of ${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} }} $ are determined from the product of the ${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} }} $ and the cross section ratio, obtaining, respectively, 0.040 $\pm$ 0.002 (stat) $\pm$ 0.005 (syst) pb and 0.62 $\pm$ 0.03 (stat) $\pm$ 0.07 (syst) pb. These measurements are the most precise to date and are consistent, within the uncertainties, with the standard model expectations obtained at next-to-leading order in quantum chromodynamics.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The b tagging discriminant distribution from data (points) for the first (left) and second (right) additional jet for the dilepton (upper) and lepton+jets (lower) channels in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after event selection, and the predicted distributions for the signal and background from simulation (shaded histograms). The contributions of single top quark, ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} {\mathrm{V}}}$, $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{H}} $, and the non-top quark processes are merged in the background (blue) entry. The $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ process is located in the bottom part of the stack due to its low contribution in comparison with the other entries. The lower panels display the ratio of the data to the expectations. The grey bands display the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The b tagging discriminant distribution from data (points) for the first additional jet for the dilepton channel in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after event selection, and the predicted distributions for the signal and background from simulation (shaded histograms). The contributions of single top quark, ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} {\mathrm{V}}}$, $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{H}} $, and the non-top quark processes are merged in the background (blue) entry. The $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ process is located in the bottom part of the stack due to its low contribution in comparison with the other entries. The lower panel displays the ratio of the data to the expectations. The grey bands display the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The b tagging discriminant distribution from data (points) for the second additional jet for the dilepton channel in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after event selection, and the predicted distributions for the signal and background from simulation (shaded histograms). The contributions of single top quark, ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} {\mathrm{V}}}$, $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{H}} $, and the non-top quark processes are merged in the background (blue) entry. The $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ process is located in the bottom part of the stack due to its low contribution in comparison with the other entries. The lower panel displays the ratio of the data to the expectations. The grey bands display the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
The b tagging discriminant distribution from data (points) for the first additional jet for the lepton+jets channel in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after event selection, and the predicted distributions for the signal and background from simulation (shaded histograms). The contributions of single top quark, ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} {\mathrm{V}}}$, $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{H}} $, and the non-top quark processes are merged in the background (blue) entry. The $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ process is located in the bottom part of the stack due to its low contribution in comparison with the other entries. The lower panel displays the ratio of the data to the expectations. The grey bands display the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
The b tagging discriminant distribution from data (points) for the second additional jet for the lepton+jets channel in decreasing order of the b tagging discriminant value after event selection, and the predicted distributions for the signal and background from simulation (shaded histograms). The contributions of single top quark, ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} {\mathrm{V}}}$, $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{H}} $, and the non-top quark processes are merged in the background (blue) entry. The $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ process is located in the bottom part of the stack due to its low contribution in comparison with the other entries. The lower panel displays the ratio of the data to the expectations. The grey bands display the combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown separately for different flavors of the additional jets: $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ (upper left), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm {j}} $ (upper right), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{c} \mathrm{\bar{c}}} $ (lower left) and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {LF}} $ (lower right). The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown for $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $. The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown for $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm {j}} $. The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown for $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{c} \mathrm{\bar{c}}} $. The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the dilepton channel shown for $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {LF}} $. The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the lepton+jets channel shown separately for different flavors of the additional jets: $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ (upper left), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm {j}} $ (upper right), $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{c} \mathrm{\bar{c}}} $ (lower left) and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {LF}} $ (lower right). The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the lepton+jets channel shown for $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $. The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Two-dimensional dist$ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $. he number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the lepton+jets channel shown for $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{c} \mathrm{\bar{c}}} $. The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Two-dimensional distributions of the b tagging discriminant for the first and second additional jets in the lepton+jets channel shown for $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {LF}} $. The number of entries is normalized to unity. The histograms are obtained from the POWHEG MC simulation.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Results of the simultaneous fit for ${R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} and {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}}$ (denoted by the cross) in the visible phase space, along with its 68 and 95% CL contours, are shown for the (left) dilepton and (right) lepton+jets channels. The solid circle shows the prediction by POWHEG + PYTHIA 8. The uncertainties in the MC prediction are a combination of statistical, $\mu _\mathrm {F}/\mu _\mathrm {R}$ scale, and PDF components; they are assumed to be uncorrelated between $ {R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $ and $ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Results of the simultaneous fit for ${R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} and {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}}$ (denoted by the cross) in the visible phase space, along with its 68 and 95% CL contours, are shown for the dilepton channel. The solid circle shows the prediction by POWHEG + PYTHIA 8. The uncertainties in the MC prediction are a combination of statistical, $\mu _\mathrm {F}/\mu _\mathrm {R}$ scale, and PDF components; they are assumed to be uncorrelated between $ {R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $ and $ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Results of the simultaneous fit for ${R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} and {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}}$ (denoted by the cross) in the visible phase space, along with its 68 and 95% CL contours, are shown for the lepton+jets channel. The solid circle shows the prediction by POWHEG + PYTHIA 8. The uncertainties in the MC prediction are a combination of statistical, $\mu _\mathrm {F}/\mu _\mathrm {R}$ scale, and PDF components; they are assumed to be uncorrelated between $ {R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $ and $ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Measured values (vertical lines) of the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ cross sections and their ratio, along with their statistical and total uncertainties (dark and light bands) in the dilepton (upper) and lepton+jets (lower) channels in the FPS. Also shown are the theoretical predictions obtained from POWHEG and MG_aMC@NLO (5FS) interfaced with PYTHIA 8, and POWHEG interfaced with HERWIG++. The theoretical predictions for the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ cross sections are normalized to $\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}}^{\text{NNLO}} = $ 832 pb. The previous measurement performed by the CMS Collaboration [18] is also shown with a rhombus marker in the lower plot. The uncertainties in the MC predictions are a combination of the statistical, $\mu _F/\mu _R$ scale, and PDF components.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Measured values (vertical lines) of the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ cross sections and their ratio, along with their statistical and total uncertainties (dark and light bands) in the dilepton lepton+jets channel in the FPS. Also shown are the theoretical predictions obtained from POWHEG and MG_aMC@NLO (5FS) interfaced with PYTHIA 8, and POWHEG interfaced with HERWIG++. The theoretical predictions for the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ cross sections are normalized to $\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}}^{\text{NNLO}} = $ 832 pb. The uncertainties in the MC predictions are a combination of the statistical, $\mu _F/\mu _R$ scale, and PDF components.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Measured values (vertical lines) of the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ cross sections and their ratio, along with their statistical and total uncertainties (dark and light bands) in the dilepton lepton+jets channel in the FPS. Also shown are the theoretical predictions obtained from POWHEG and MG_aMC@NLO (5FS) interfaced with PYTHIA 8, and POWHEG interfaced with HERWIG++. The theoretical predictions for the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ cross sections are normalized to $\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}}^{\text{NNLO}} = $ 832 pb. The previous measurement performed by the CMS Collaboration [18] is also shown with a rhombus marker. The uncertainties in the MC predictions are a combination of the statistical, $\mu _F/\mu _R$ scale, and PDF components.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the requirements for a simulated event to be in the fiducial (VPS) and full (FPS) phase space regions for the $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}} $ categories in the dilepton and lepton+jets channels. Details of the particle-level definitions are described in the text. The symbol $\ell $ denotes a lepton (e or $\mu$).

png pdf
Table 2:
Expected and observed numbers of events in the dilepton and lepton+jets channels after applying the event selection. The results are given for the different ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} $(+jets) categories, the individual sources of background (from MC simulation), normalized to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$, and the observed number from data. The uncertainties quoted for each MC contribution include all the systematic uncertainties described in Section 7.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of the individual contributions to the systematic uncertainty in the $ {R_{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}} / {\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $ and $ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $ measurements for the VPS. The uncertainties are given as relative uncertainties. Some sources include a linear (lin.) or quadratic (quad.) dependency on the fluctuations in data and simulation.

png pdf
Table 4:
The measured cross sections $ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}}}}} $ and $ {\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}} \mathrm {jj}}}} $, and their ratio, for the VPS and FPS, with the results in the latter corrected for the acceptance and branching fractions. In both the VPS and FPS definitions, the dilepton and lepton+jets channels require particle-level jets with $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 30 GeV and 20 GeV, respectively. The predictions from several MC simulations are also shown. The uncertainties in the measurements are split into their statistical (first) and systematic (second) components, while the uncertainties in the MC predictions are a combination of the statistical, $\mu _\mathrm {F}/\mu _\mathrm {R}$ scale, and PDF components.
Summary
Measurements of the ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ and ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} $ cross sections and their ratio are performed independently in the dilepton and lepton+jets final states using a data sample of proton-proton collisions collected at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016, and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Leptons and particle-level jets must be in the experimentally accessible kinematic region. The inclusive ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} $ cross section and the ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ to ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} $ cross section ratio in the fiducial phase space are measured by means of a binned maximum likelihood fit to the b tagging discriminant distribution of the additional jets, from which the inclusive ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ cross section measurement is inferred. The cross section ratio and the inclusive ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} $ cross section in the fiducial phase space are extrapolated to the full phase space after correcting for the detector acceptance.

The measured inclusive cross sections in the fiducial phase space for the dilepton and lepton+jets channels, respectively, are ${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} }} =$ 0.040 $\pm$ 0.002 (stat) $\pm$ 0.005 (syst) pb and 0.62 $\pm$ 0.03 (stat) $\pm$ 0.07 (syst) pb, performed by multiplying ${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} }} $ with the ratio of ${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} }} $ to ${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} }} $, where ${\sigma_{{\mathrm{t\bar{t}} \mathrm{jj}} }} = $ 2.36 $\pm$ 0.02 (stat) $\pm$ 0.20 (syst) pb and 31.0 $\pm$ 0.2 (stat) $\pm$ 2.9 (syst) pb and the ratios are 0.017 $\pm$ 0.001 (stat) $\pm$ 0.001 (syst) and 0.020 $\pm$ 0.001 (stat) $\pm$ 0.001 (syst). The treatment of the systematic uncertainties as nuisance parameters in the fit leads to an improvement in the precision compared to previous measurements. The inclusive ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ cross sections and the cross section ratios for both decay channels measured in the full phase space have values higher than, but consistent with, the predictions from several different Monte Carlo generators. A measured ${\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\mathrm{b\bar{b}}} $ cross section higher than Monte Carlo predictions is also reported in a recent measurement performed by the CMS Collaboration in the fully hadronic final state [19].
References
1 G. Bevilacqua and M. Worek On the ratio of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t} b\overline{b}} $ and $ \mathrm{t\overline{t} jj} $ cross sections at the CERN Large Hadron Collider JHEP 07 (2014) 135 1403.2046
2 G. Bevilacqua, M. Czakon, C. G. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek Hadronic top-quark pair production in association with two jets at next-to-leading order QCD PRD 84 (2011) 114017 1108.2851
3 T. Je\uzo, J. M. Lindert, N. Moretti, and S. Pozzorini New NLOPS predictions for $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ + b-jet production at the LHC EPJC 78 (2018) 502 1802.00426
4 A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and S. Pozzorini NLO QCD corrections to $ \mathrm{t\overline{t} b\overline{b}} $ production at the LHC: 1. Quark-antiquark annihilation JHEP 08 (2008) 108 0807.1248
5 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying to a W boson pair in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 791 (2019) 96 CMS-HIG-16-042
1806.05246
6 CMS Collaboration Measurements of Higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2018) 185 CMS-HIG-16-040
1804.02716
7 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2017) 47 CMS-HIG-16-041
1706.09936
8 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the H $ \to $ ZZ$ ^{*}\to4\ell $ and H $ \to\gamma\gamma $ channels with $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector PLB 784 (2018) 345 1806.00242
9 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of Higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel with 36 fb$^{-1}$ of pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 98 (2018) 052005 1802.04146
10 CMS Collaboration Observation of $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}H} $ production PRL 120 (2018) 231801 CMS-HIG-17-035
1804.02610
11 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector PLB 784 (2018) 173 1806.00425
12 CMS Collaboration Search for $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{H} $ production in the $ \mathrm{H}\to \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ decay channel with leptonic $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ decays in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2019) 026 CMS-HIG-17-026
1804.03682
13 ATLAS Collaboration Search for the standard model Higgs boson produced in association with top quarks and decaying into a $ \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ pair in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 97 (2018) 072016 1712.08895
14 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of fiducial cross-sections for $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ production with one or two additional b-jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016) 11 1508.06868
15 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with additional heavy-flavour jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 04 (2019) 046 1811.12113
16 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the cross section ratio $ \sigma_\mathrm{t \bar{t} b \bar{b}} / \sigma_\mathrm{t \bar{t} jj} $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV PLB 746 (2015) 132 CMS-TOP-13-010
1411.5621
17 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with additional jet activity, including b quark jets, in the dilepton decay channel using pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 379 CMS-TOP-12-041
1510.03072
18 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ cross sections in association with b jets and inclusive jets and their ratio using dilepton final states in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 776 (2018) 355 CMS-TOP-16-010
1705.10141
19 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ production cross section in the all-jet final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 803 (2020) 135285 CMS-TOP-18-011
1909.05306
20 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
21 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
22 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
23 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
24 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
25 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
26 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
27 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
28 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
29 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
30 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, P. Nason, and E. Re Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers JHEP 04 (2015) 114 1412.1828
31 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
32 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in PYTHIA8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
33 M. Bahr et al. Herwig++ physics and manual EPJC 58 (2008) 639 0803.0883
34 M. H. Seymour and A. Siodmok Constraining MPI models using $ \sigma_{\rm eff} $ and recent Tevatron and LHC underlying event data JHEP 10 (2013) 113 1307.5015
35 S. Dulat et al. New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics PRD 93 (2016) 033006 1506.07443
36 S. Frixione et al. Single-top hadroproduction in association with a W boson JHEP 07 (2008) 029 0805.3067
37 E. Re Single-top W$ t $-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
38 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
39 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
40 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
41 M. Cacciari et al. Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation PLB 710 (2012) 612 1111.5869
42 P. Barnreuther, M. Czakon, and A. Mitov Percent level precision physics at the Tevatron: First genuine NNLO QCD corrections to pp $ \rightarrow \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ + X PRL 109 (2012) 132001 1204.5201
43 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels JHEP 12 (2012) 054 1207.0236
44 M. Czakon and A. Mitov NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction JHEP 01 (2013) 080 1210.6832
45 M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein, and C. Schwinn Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation NPB 855 (2012) 695 1109.1536
46 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders through $ \mathcal{O}({{\alpha}}_{S}^{4}) $ PRL 110 (2013) 252004 {1303.6254}
47 N. Kidonakis NNLL threshold resummation for top-pair and single-top production Phys. Part. Nucl. 45 (2014) 714 1210.7813
48 Alwall, J. and Hoche, S. and Krauss, F. and others Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
49 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
50 ATLAS, CDF, CMS, and D\O Collaborations First combination of Tevatron and LHC measurements of the top-quark mass CMS-PAS-TOP-13-014, D0-NOTE-6416, FERMILAB-TM-2582- 1403.4427
51 T. Gehrmann et al. W$ ^{+} $W$ ^{-} $ production at hadron colliders in next to next to leading order QCD PRL 113 (2014) 212001 1408.5243
52 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC NPPS 205--206 (2010) 10 1007.3492
53 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
54 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The catchment area of jets JHEP 04 (2008) 005 0802.1188
55 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
56 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
57 Particle Data Group, M. Tanabashi et al. Review of particle physics PRD 98 (2018) 030001
58 D\O Collaboration Direct measurement of the top quark mass by the D$ \O $ Collaboration PRD 58 (1998) 052001 ep-ex/9801025
59 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
60 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for the production of top quark pairs and of additional jets in lepton+jets events from pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV PRD 97 (2018) 112003 CMS-TOP-17-002
1803.08856
61 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
62 Butterworth, Jon and others PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
63 J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands String formation beyond leading colour JHEP 08 (2015) 003 1505.01681
64 S. Argyropoulos and T. Sjostrand Effects of color reconnection on $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ final states at the LHC JHEP 11 (2014) 043 1407.6653
65 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN