CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SUS-19-008
Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with two same-sign leptons or at least three leptons and jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV.
Abstract: A data sample of events from proton-proton collisions with two isolated same-sign leptons or at least three leptons, and at least two jets, is studied in a search for signatures of new physics phenomena by the CMS Collaboration at the LHC. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$, at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The properties of the events are consistent with expectations from standard model processes, and no excess yield is observed. Exclusion limits at 95% confidence level are set on cross sections for the pair production of gluinos or squarks for various decay scenarios in the context of supersymmetry models conserving or violating R-parity. The observed lower mass limits are as high as 2.1 TeV for gluinos, and 0.9 TeV for top and bottom squarks.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Diagrams illustrating the simplified RPC SUSY models considered in this analysis.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Diagrams illustrating the two RPV SUSY models considered in this analysis.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Diagram illustrating one of the RPV SUSY models considered in this analysis.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Diagram illustrating one of the RPV SUSY models considered in this analysis.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of the main analysis variables after the baseline selection in all signal categories: ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$, ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, ${m_\mathrm {T}^{\text {min}}}$, ${N_\text {jets}}$, ${N_{\mathrm{b}}}$, and the charge of the same sign pair, where the last bin includes the overflow. The hatched area represents the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panels show the ratio of the observed event yield and the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distribution of ${H_{\mathrm {T}}}$ after the baseline selection in all signal categories. The last bin includes the overflow. The hatched area represents the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panel shows the ratio of the observed event yield and the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distribution of ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ after the baseline selection in all signal categories. The last bin includes the overflow. The hatched area represents the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panel shows the ratio of the observed event yield and the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Distribution of ${m_\mathrm {T}^{\text {min}}}$ after the baseline selection in all signal categories. The last bin includes the overflow. The hatched area represents the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panel shows the ratio of the observed event yield and the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Distribution of ${N_\text {jets}}$ after the baseline selection in all signal categories. The last bin includes the overflow. The hatched area represents the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panel shows the ratio of the observed event yield and the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-e:
Distribution of ${N_{\mathrm{b}}}$ after the baseline selection in all signal categories. The last bin includes the overflow. The hatched area represents the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panel shows the ratio of the observed event yield and the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 3-f:
Distribution of the charge of the same sign pair, after the baseline selection in all signal categories. The last bin includes the overflow. The hatched area represents the total uncertainty in the background prediction. The lower panel shows the ratio of the observed event yield and the background prediction.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Expected and observed SR yields for the SSHH, SSHL, SSLL signal categories.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Expected and observed SR yields for the SSHH signal category.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Expected and observed SR yields for the SSHL signal category.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Expected and observed SR yields for the SSLL signal category.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Expected and observed SR yields for the ML and LM signal categories.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Expected and observed SR yields for the ML signal category.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Expected and observed SR yields for the LM signal category.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ versus $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}}$ plane for the T1tttt model (left), with off-shell third-generation squarks, and the T5tttt (right) model, with on-shell third-generation squarks. For the T5tttt model, $m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} = m_{\mathrm{t}}$. The right-hand side color scale indicates the excluded cross section values for a given point in the SUSY particle mass plane. The solid, black curves represent the observed exclusion limits assuming the NLO+NLL cross sections [42,43,44,45,46,47] (thick line), or their variations of $\pm $1 standard deviation (thin lines). The dashed, red curves show the expected limits with the corresponding $\pm $1 and $\pm $2 standard deviation experimental uncertainties. Excluded regions are to the left and below the limit curves.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ versus $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}}$ plane for the T1tttt model, with off-shell third-generation squarks. The right-hand side color scale indicates the excluded cross section values for a given point in the SUSY particle mass plane. The solid, black curves represent the observed exclusion limits assuming the NLO+NLL cross sections [42,43,44,45,46,47] (thick line), or their variations of $\pm $1 standard deviation (thin lines). The dashed, red curves show the expected limits with the corresponding $\pm $1 and $\pm $2 standard deviation experimental uncertainties. Excluded regions are to the left and below the limit curves.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ versus $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}}$ plane for the T5tttt model, with on-shell third-generation squarks. For this model, $m_{\tilde{\mathrm{t}}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} = m_{\mathrm{t}}$. The right-hand side color scale indicates the excluded cross section values for a given point in the SUSY particle mass plane. The solid, black curves represent the observed exclusion limits assuming the NLO+NLL cross sections [42,43,44,45,46,47] (thick line), or their variations of $\pm $1 standard deviation (thin lines). The dashed, red curves show the expected limits with the corresponding $\pm $1 and $\pm $2 standard deviation experimental uncertainties. Excluded regions are to the left and below the limit curves.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the plane of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ versus $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}}$ for the T5qqqqWZ model with $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}=0.5(m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ (a) and with $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1} = m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ + 20 GeV (b). The notations are as in Fig. 6.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the plane of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ versus $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}}$ for the T5qqqqWZ model with $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}=0.5(m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$. The notations are as in Fig. 6.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the plane of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ versus $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}}$ for the T5qqqqWZ model with $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1} = m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ + 20 GeV. The notations are as in Fig. 6.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the plane of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ versus $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}}$ for the T5qqqqWW model with $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}=0.5(m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$ (a) and with $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1} = m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ + 20 GeV (b). The notations are as in Fig. 6.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the plane of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ versus $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}}$ for the T5qqqqWW model with $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}=0.5(m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1})$. The notations are as in Fig. 6.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the plane of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ versus $m_{{\mathrm{\tilde{g}}}}$ for the T5qqqqWW model with $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1} = m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ + 20 GeV. The notations are as in Fig. 6.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Exclusion regions at 95% CL in the plane of $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1}$ versus $m_{\tilde{\mathrm{b}}}$ for the T6ttWW model with $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} = $ 50 GeV. The notations are as in Fig. 6.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Exclusion regions at the 95% CL in the plane of $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{1})$ versus $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2})$ for the T6ttHZ simplified model with $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2})-m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1) = $ 175 GeV. The three exclusions represent BR($\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2}\rightarrow \tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{1}\mathrm {Z})$ of 0%, 50%, and 100%, respectively. The right-hand side color scale indicates the excluded cross section values for a given point in the SUSY particle mass plane. Observed and expected limit curves indicate the boundaries of the excluded regions (to the left and below the curve).

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Exclusion regions at the 95% CL in the plane of $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{1})$ versus $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2})$ for the T6ttHZ simplified model with $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2})-m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1) = $ 175 GeV and BR($\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2}\rightarrow \tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{1}\mathrm {Z})$ of 0%. The right-hand side color scale indicates the excluded cross section values for a given point in the SUSY particle mass plane. Observed and expected limit curves indicate the boundaries of the excluded regions (to the left and below the curve).

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Exclusion regions at the 95% CL in the plane of $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{1})$ versus $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2})$ for the T6ttHZ simplified model with $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2})-m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1) = $ 175 GeV and BR($\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2}\rightarrow \tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{1}\mathrm {Z})$ of 50%. The right-hand side color scale indicates the excluded cross section values for a given point in the SUSY particle mass plane. Observed and expected limit curves indicate the boundaries of the excluded regions (to the left and below the curve).

png pdf
Figure 10-c:
Exclusion regions at the 95% CL in the plane of $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{1})$ versus $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2})$ for the T6ttHZ simplified model with $m(\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2})-m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1) = $ 175 GeV and BR($\tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{2}\rightarrow \tilde{\mathrm{t}} _{1}\mathrm {Z})$ of 100%. The right-hand side color scale indicates the excluded cross section values for a given point in the SUSY particle mass plane. Observed and expected limit curves indicate the boundaries of the excluded regions (to the left and below the curve).

png pdf
Figure 11:
Limits on RPV gluino pair production with each gluino decaying into four quarks and one lepton (T1qqqqL, left) and each gluino decaying into a top, bottom, and strange quark (T1tbs, right)

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
Limits on RPV gluino pair production with each gluino decaying into four quarks and one lepton (T1qqqqL).

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
Limits on RPV gluino pair production with each gluino decaying into a top, bottom, and strange quark (T1tbs).
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
$ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ and $\eta $ requirements for leptons and jets. Note that the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ thresholds to count jets and b-tagged jets are different.

png pdf
Table 2:
SR definitions for the SSHH category. Charge split cells are indicated with ($++$) and ($--$). In order to avoid overlaps, an upper bound $ {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}} < $ 300 GeV is used for regions with $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 300 GeV. There are 62 regions in total.

png pdf
Table 3:
SR definitions for the SSHL category. In order to avoid overlaps, an upper bound $ {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}} < $ 300 GeV is used for regions with $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 300 GeV. There are 43 regions in total.

png pdf
Table 4:
SR definitions for the SSLL category. All SRs in this category require $ {N_\text {jets}} \geq $ 2. There are 8 regions in total.

png pdf
Table 5:
SR definitions for the LM category. All SRs in this category require $ {N_\text {jets}} \geq $ 2, $ {{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}} < $ 50 GeV, $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} > $ 300 GeV, and HH lepton momenta. The 2 high $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ regions are split only by $ {N_\text {jets}} $, giving 11 regions in total.

png pdf
Table 6:
SR definitions for the ML category. All SRs in these categories require $ {N_\text {jets}} \geq $ 2. Regions marked with ${}^\dagger $ are split by $ {m_\mathrm {T}^{\text {min}}} = $ 120 GeV, with the high $ {m_\mathrm {T}^{\text {min}}} $ region specified by the second label. On-Z regions events include an OS same flavor lepton pair with 76 $ < m_{\ell \ell} < $ 106 GeV. There are 44 regions in total.

png pdf
Table 7:
Summary of the sources of uncertainty and their effect on the yields of different processes in the SRs. The first two groups list experimental and theoretical uncertainties assigned to processes estimated using simulation, while the last group lists uncertainties assigned to processes whose yield is estimated from data. The uncertainties in the first group also apply to signal samples. Reported values are representative for the most relevant signal regions.

png pdf
Table 8:
Expected background and observed event yields in the search regions used in this search.

png pdf
Table 9:
Event yields in HH regions. Yields shown as "-'' have a contribution smaller than 0.01, or do not contribute to a particular region.

png pdf
Table 10:
Event yields in HL regions. Yields shown as "-'' have a contribution smaller than 0.01, or do not contribute to a particular region.

png pdf
Table 11:
Event yields in LL regions. Yields shown as "-'' have a contribution smaller than 0.01, or do not contribute to a particular region.

png pdf
Table 12:
Event yields in ML regions. Yields shown as "-'' have a contribution smaller than 0.01, or do not contribute to a particular region.

png pdf
Table 13:
Event yields in LM regions. Yields shown as "-'' have a contribution smaller than 0.01, or do not contribute to a particular region.
Summary
A sample of same-sign dilepton or trilepton events produced in association with several jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$, has been studied to search for manifestations of physics beyond the standard model. The data are found to be consistent with the standard model expectations, and no excess event yield is observed. The results are interpreted as limits at 95% confidence level on cross sections for the production of new particles in simplified supersymmetric models, considering both RPC and RPV scenarios. Using calculations for these cross sections as functions of particle masses, the limits are turned into lower mass limits that are as high as 2.1 TeV for gluinos and 0.9 TeV for top and bottom squarks, depending on the details of the model.
References
1 R. M. Barnett, J. F. Gunion, and H. E. Haber Discovering supersymmetry with like-sign dileptons PLB 315 (1993) 349 hep-ph/9306204
2 M. Guchait and D. P. Roy Like-sign dilepton signature for gluino production at CERN LHC including top quark and Higgs boson effects PRD 52 (1995) 133 hep-ph/9412329
3 Y. Bai and Z. Han Top-antitop and top-top resonances in the dilepton channel at the CERN LHC JHEP 04 (2009) 056 0809.4487
4 E. L. Berger et al. Top quark forward-backward asymmetry and same-sign top quark pairs PRL 106 (2011) 201801 1101.5625
5 T. Plehn and T. M. P. Tait Seeking Sgluons JPG 36 (2009) 075001 0810.3919
6 S. Calvet, B. Fuks, P. Gris, and L. Valery Searching for sgluons in multitop events at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV JHEP 04 (2013) 043 1212.3360
7 K. J. F. Gaemers and F. Hoogeveen Higgs production and decay into heavy flavors with the gluon fusion mechanism PLB 146 (1984) 347
8 G. C. Branco et al. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models PR 516 (2012) 1 1106.0034
9 F. M. L. Almeida, Jr. et al. Same-sign dileptons as a signature for heavy Majorana neutrinos in hadron-hadron collisions PLB 400 (1997) 331 hep-ph/9703441
10 R. Contino and G. Servant Discovering the top partners at the LHC using same-sign dilepton final states JHEP 06 (2008) 026 0801.1679
11 ATLAS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in final states with two same-sign or three leptons and jets using 36 fb$ ^{-1} $ of $ \sqrt{s}=13 TeV pp $ collision data with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2017) 084 1706.03731
12 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with two leptons of same sign, missing transverse momentum, and jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC77 (2017), no. 9, 578 CMS-SUS-16-035
1704.07323
13 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in events with at least three electrons or muons, jets, and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 02 (2018) 067 CMS-SUS-16-041
1710.09154
14 P. Ramond Dual theory for free fermions PRD 3 (1971) 2415
15 Y. A. Gol'fand and E. P. Likhtman Extension of the algebra of Poincar$ \'e $ group generators and violation of P invariance JEPTL 13 (1971)323
16 A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz Factorizable dual model of pions NPB 31 (1971) 86
17 D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov Possible universal neutrino interaction JEPTL 16 (1972)438
18 J. Wess and B. Zumino A lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations PLB 49 (1974) 52
19 J. Wess and B. Zumino Supergauge transformations in four-dimensions NPB 70 (1974) 39
20 P. Fayet Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino NPB 90 (1975) 104
21 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics PR 110 (1984) 1
22 S. P. Martin A supersymmetry primer in Perspectives on Supersymmetry II, G. L. Kane, ed., p. 1 World Scientific, 2010 Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys., vol. 21
23 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
24 E. Nikolidakis and C. Smith Minimal Flavor Violation, Seesaw, and R-parity PRD77 (2008) 015021 0710.3129
25 C. Smith Minimal Flavor Violation as an alternative to R-parity in Proceedings, 34th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP 2008): Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July 30-August 5, 2008 2008 0809.3152
26 C. Csaki, Y. Grossman, and B. Heidenreich MFV SUSY: A Natural Theory for R-Parity Violation PRD85 (2012) 095009 1111.1239
27 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
28 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
29 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
30 T. Melia, P. Nason, R. Rontsch, and G. Zanderighi W$ ^+ $W$ ^- $, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX JHEP 11 (2011) 078 1107.5051
31 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi $ \mathrm{W}^+ \mathrm{W}^- $ , $ \mathrm{W} \mathrm{Z} $ and $ \mathrm{Z} \mathrm{Z} $ production in the POWHEG BOX V2 EPJC 74 (2014) 2702 1311.1365
32 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
33 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC77 (2017), no. 10, 663 1706.00428
34 T. Sjostrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159--177 1410.3012
35 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
36 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
37 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements CMS-PAS-GEN-17-001 CMS-PAS-GEN-17-001
38 GEANT4 Collaboration $ GEANT4\ $ ---$ \ $ a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
39 S. Abdullin et al. The fast simulation of the CMS detector at LHC J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032049
40 CMS Collaboration Measurements of $ t\bar{t} $ cross sections in association with $ b $ jets and inclusive jets and their ratio using dilepton final states in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB776 (2018) 355--378 CMS-TOP-16-010
1705.10141
41 W. Beenakker et al. NNLL-fast: predictions for coloured supersymmetric particle production at the LHC with threshold and Coulomb resummation JHEP 12 (2016) 133 1607.07741
42 W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Squark and gluino production at hadron colliders NPB 492 (1997) 51 hep-ph/9610490
43 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Threshold resummation for squark-antisquark and gluino-pair production at the LHC PRL 102 (2009) 111802 0807.2405
44 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Soft gluon resummation for the production of gluino-gluino and squark-antisquark pairs at the LHC PRD 80 (2009) 095004 0905.4749
45 W. Beenakker et al. Soft-gluon resummation for squark and gluino hadroproduction JHEP 12 (2009) 041 0909.4418
46 W. Beenakker et al. Squark and gluino hadroproduction Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 2637 1105.1110
47 C. Borschensky et al. Squark and gluino production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13, 14, 33 and 100 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 3174 1407.5066
48 D. Alves et al. Simplified models for LHC new physics searches JPG 39 (2012) 105005 1105.2838
49 CMS Collaboration Interpretation of searches for supersymmetry with simplified models PRD 88 (2013) 052017 CMS-SUS-11-016
1301.2175
50 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
51 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
52 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the cms detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
53 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
54 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
55 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
56 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
57 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2016) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
58 CMS Collaboration Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data CMS-PAS-JME-16-003 CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
59 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018), no. 05, P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
60 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=13 TeV using the CMS detector CMS-PAS-JME-17-001 CMS-PAS-JME-17-001
61 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics in same-sign dilepton events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 439 CMS-SUS-15-008
1605.03171
62 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
63 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P02006 CMS-JME-13-003
1411.0511
64 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurements for the 2016 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
65 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
66 A. Kalogeropoulos and J. Alwall The SysCalc code: A tool to derive theoretical systematic uncertainties 1801.08401
67 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the $ t\bar{t}Z $ and $ t\bar{t}W $ cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector 1901.03584
68 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the cross section for top quark pair production in association with a W or Z boson in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 08 (2018) 011 CMS-TOP-17-005
1711.02547
69 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
70 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ CL_S $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
71 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the lhc higgs boson search combination in summer 2011 ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-011, CMS NOTE-2011/005
72 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN