CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SMP-20-006
Measurements of production cross sections of polarized same-sign W boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: The first measurements of production cross sections of polarized same-sign $\mathrm{W}^{\pm}\mathrm{W^{\pm}}$ boson pairs in proton-proton collisions are reported. The measurements are based on a sample of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. Events are selected by requiring exactly two leptons, electrons or muons, of the same charge, moderate missing transverse momentum, and two jets with a large rapidity separation and a large dijet mass. An observed (expected) 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section for longitudinally polarized same-sign $\mathrm{W}^{\pm}\mathrm{W^{\pm}}$ boson pairs of 1.17 (0.88) fb is reported, with the helicity eigenstates defined in the $\mathrm{W}^{\pm}\mathrm{W^{\pm}}$ center-of-mass reference frame. The electroweak production of same-sign $\mathrm{W}^{\pm}\mathrm{W^{\pm}}$ boson pairs with at least one of the W bosons longitudinally polarized, is measured with an observed (expected) significance of 2.3 (3.1) standard deviations.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Illustrative Feynman diagrams of VBS processes contributing to the EW-induced production of events containing $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ boson pairs decaying to leptons and two forward jets. Diagrams with the triple gauge coupling vertex (left), the quartic gauge coupling vertex (center), and the t-channel Higgs boson exchange (right) are shown.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Illustrative Feynman diagram of VBS processes contributing to the EW-induced production of events containing $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ boson pairs decaying to leptons and two forward jets: a diagram with the triple gauge coupling vertex is shown.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Illustrative Feynman diagram of VBS processes contributing to the EW-induced production of events containing $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ boson pairs decaying to leptons and two forward jets: a diagram with the quartic gauge coupling vertex is shown.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Illustrative Feynman diagram of VBS processes contributing to the EW-induced production of events containing $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ boson pairs decaying to leptons and two forward jets: a diagram with the t-channel Higgs boson exchange is shown.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distributions of the $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ (upper left), $ {\Delta \phi _{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ (upper right), $\Delta \phi _{\ell \ell}$ (lower left), and of the output score of the inclusive BDT (lower right) in the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ SR. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ process include the contributions from the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $, $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $, and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes (shown as solid lines), QCD $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $, and interference. The histograms for $ {\mathrm {t}{\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm {t}\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering and ${\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} $ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distribution of $ {m_{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ in the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ SR. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit. The histogram for $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ process includes the contributions from the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $, $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $, and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes (shown as solid lines), QCD $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $, and interference. The histogram for $ {\mathrm {t}{\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds includes the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm {t}\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histogram for other backgrounds includes the contributions from double parton scattering and ${\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} $ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distribution of $ {\Delta \phi _{{\mathrm {j}} {\mathrm {j}}}} $ in the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ SR. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit. The histogram for $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ process includes the contributions from the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $, $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $, and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes (shown as solid lines), QCD $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $, and interference. The histogram for $ {\mathrm {t}{\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds includes the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm {t}\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histogram for other backgrounds includes the contributions from double parton scattering and ${\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} $ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Distribution of $\Delta \phi _{\ell \ell}$ in the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ SR. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit. The histogram for $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ process includes the contributions from the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $, $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $, and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes (shown as solid lines), QCD $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $, and interference. The histogram for $ {\mathrm {t}{\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds includes the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm {t}\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histogram for other backgrounds includes the contributions from double parton scattering and ${\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} $ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Distribution of the output score of the inclusive BDT in the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ SR. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit. The histogram for $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ process includes the contributions from the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $, $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $, and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes (shown as solid lines), QCD $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $, and interference. The histogram for $ {\mathrm {t}{\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds includes the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm {t}\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histogram for other backgrounds includes the contributions from double parton scattering and ${\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} $ processes. The overflow is included in the last bin. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of the output score of the signal BDT used for the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ cross section measurements (left) and of the output score of the signal BDT used for the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ cross section measurements (right). The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit. The histograms for $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ process include the contributions from the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $, $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $, and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes (shown as solid lines), QCD $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $, and interference. The histograms for $ {\mathrm {t}{\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds include the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm {t}\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histograms for other backgrounds include the contributions from double parton scattering and ${\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} $ processes. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distribution of the output score of the signal BDT used for the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ cross section measurements. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit. The histogram for $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ process include the contributions from the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $, $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $, and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes (shown as solid lines), QCD $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $, and interference. The histogram for $ {\mathrm {t}{\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds includes the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm {t}\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histogram for other backgrounds includes the contributions from double parton scattering and ${\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} $ processes. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distribution of the output score of the signal BDT used for the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ cross section measurements. The predicted yields are shown with their best fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit. The histogram for $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ process include the contributions from the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $, $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $, and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes (shown as solid lines), QCD $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $, and interference. The histogram for $ {\mathrm {t}{\mathrm{V}} \mathrm {x}} $ backgrounds includes the contributions from ${\mathrm{t} {}\mathrm{\bar{t}}} {\mathrm{V}} $ and $ {\mathrm {t}\mathrm{Z} \mathrm{q}} $ processes. The histogram for other backgrounds includes the contributions from double parton scattering and ${\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} {\mathrm{V}} $ processes. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The gray bands represent the uncertainties in the predicted yields.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Profile likelihood scan as a function of the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $ cross section. The red (blue) line represents the expected values in the background-only hypothesis considering all systematic uncertainties (only statistical uncertainties). The green line shows the expected values for the signal-plus-background hypothesis. The observed values are represented by the black line.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the selection requirements defining the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ SR. The $ { | {m_{\ell \ell}} - m_{\mathrm{Z}} |}$ requirement is applied to the dielectron final state only.

png pdf
Table 2:
List and description of all the input variables for the signal BDT trainings.

png pdf
Table 3:
List and description of the input variables for the inclusive BDT training.

png pdf
Table 4:
Systematic uncertainties of the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ cross section measurements in units of percent.

png pdf
Table 5:
Expected yields from various SM processes and observed data events in $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ SR. The combination of the statistical and systematic uncertainties is shown. The expected yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations from the simultaneous fit for the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ cross sections. The $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ yields are obtained from the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ yield assuming the SM prediction for the ratio of the yields.

png pdf
Table 6:
Measured fiducial cross sections for the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes and for the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes for the helicity eigenstates defined in the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm \mathrm{W} ^\pm} $ center-of-mass frame. The theoretical predictions including the $\mathcal {O}({\alpha _S} \alpha ^6)$ and $\mathcal {O}(\alpha ^7)$ corrections to the MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO LO cross sections, as described in the text, are also shown. The theoretical uncertainties include statistical, PDF, and LO scale uncertainties. $\mathcal {B}$ is the branching fraction for $\mathrm{W} \mathrm{W} \to \ell \nu \ell '\nu $ [53].

png pdf
Table 7:
Measured fiducial cross sections for the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes and for the $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {L}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{X}} $ and $ {\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}\mathrm{W} ^\pm _{\mathrm {T}}} $ processes for the helicity eigenstates defined in the parton-parton center-of-mass frame. The theoretical predictions including the $\mathcal {O}({\alpha _S} \alpha ^6)$ and $\mathcal {O}(\alpha ^7)$ corrections to the MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO LO cross sections, as described in the text, are also shown. The theoretical uncertainties include statistical, PDF, and LO scale uncertainties. $\mathcal {B}$ is the branching fraction for $\mathrm{W} \mathrm{W} \to \ell \nu \ell '\nu $ [53].
Summary
The first measurements of production cross sections for polarized same-sign ${\mathrm{W}^\pm\mathrm{W}^\pm} $ boson pairs in proton-proton collisions are reported. The measurements are based on a sample of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. Events are selected by requiring exactly two leptons, electrons or muons, of the same charge, moderate missing transverse momentum, and two jets with a large rapidity separation and a large dijet mass. BDTs are used to separate between the polarized scattering processes by exploiting the kinematic differences. An observed (expected) 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section for longitudinally polarized same-sign ${\mathrm{W}^\pm\mathrm{W}^\pm} $ boson pairs of 1.17 (0.88) fb is reported with the helicity eigenstates defined in the ${\mathrm{W}^\pm\mathrm{W}^\pm} $ center-of-mass reference frame. The electroweak production of the ${\mathrm{W}^\pm\mathrm{W}^\pm} $ boson pairs where at least one of the W bosons is longitudinally polarized, is measured with an observed (expected) significance of 2.3 (3.1) standard deviations. Results are also reported with the polarizations defined in the parton-parton center-of-mass reference frame. The measured cross section values agree with the theoretical predictions within uncertainties.
References
1 B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker The strength of weak interactions at very high-energies and the Higgs boson mass PRL 38 (1977) 883
2 B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker Weak interactions at very high-energies: the role of the Higgs boson mass PRD 16 (1977) 1519
3 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
4 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
5 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
6 D. Espriu and B. Yencho Longitudinal WW scattering in light of the Higgs boson discovery PRD 87 (2013) 055017 1212.4158
7 J. Chang, K. Cheung, C.-T. Lu, and T.-C. Yuan WW scattering in the era of post-Higgs-boson discovery PRD 87 (2013) 093005 1303.6335
8 S. Brass et al. Transversal modes and Higgs bosons in electroweak vector-boson scattering at the LHC EPJC 78 (2018) 931 1807.02512
9 ATLAS Collaboration Evidence for electroweak production of $ W^{\pm}W^{\pm} $jj in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 113 (2014) 141803 1405.6241
10 CMS Collaboration Study of vector boson scattering and search for new physics in events with two same-sign leptons and two jets PRL 114 (2015) 051801 CMS-SMP-13-015
1410.6315
11 CMS Collaboration Observation of electroweak production of same-sign W boson pairs in the two jet and two same-sign lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 120 (2018) 081801 CMS-SMP-17-004
1709.05822
12 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of electroweak production of a same-sign $ W $ boson pair in association with two jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 123 (2019) 161801 1906.03203
13 CMS Collaboration Measurements of production cross sections of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV Submitted to PLB CMS-SMP-19-012
2005.01173
14 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2016 data-taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
15 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
16 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002 CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
17 CMS Collaboration The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
18 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
19 \GEANTfour Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
20 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
21 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph 5: going beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
22 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
23 D. Buarque Franzosi, O. Mattelaer, R. Ruiz, and S. Shil Automated predictions from polarized matrix elements JHEP 04 (2020) 082 1912.01725
24 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
25 A. Ballestrero et al. PHANTOM: a Monte Carlo event generator for six parton final states at high energy colliders CPC 180 (2009) 401 0801.3359
26 A. Ballestrero, D. Buarque Franzosi, L. Oggero, and E. Maina Vector boson scattering at the LHC: counting experiments for unitarized models in a full six fermion approach JHEP 03 (2012) 031 1112.1171
27 A. Ballestrero, E. Maina, and G. Pelliccioli $ \mathrm{W} $ boson polarization in vector boson scattering at the LHC JHEP 03 (2018) 170 1710.09339
28 B. Biedermann, A. Denner, and M. Pellen Large electroweak corrections to vector boson scattering at the Large Hadron Collider PRL 118 (2017) 261801 1611.02951
29 B. Biedermann, A. Denner, and M. Pellen Complete NLO corrections to W$ ^{+} $W$ ^{+} $ scattering and its irreducible background at the LHC JHEP 10 (2017) 124 1708.00268
30 A. Denner and S. Pozzorini One loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections. 1. Results EPJC 18 (2001) 461 hep-ph/0010201
31 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
32 M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev, and M. Wiesemann $ \mathrm{W}^{\pm}\mathrm{Z} $ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD PLB 761 (2016) 179 1604.08576
33 S. Frixione and B. R. Webber Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations JHEP 06 (2002) 029 hep-ph/0204244
34 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
35 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
36 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 07 (2008) 060 0805.4802
37 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
38 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the associated production of a single top quark and a Z boson in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 779 (2018) 358 CMS-TOP-16-020
1712.02825
39 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
40 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
41 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
42 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
43 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
44 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
45 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
46 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
47 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data Submitted to JINST CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
48 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
49 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
50 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
51 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
52 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying to a W boson pair in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 791 (2019) 96 CMS-HIG-16-042
1806.05246
53 Particle Data Group, M. Tanabashi et al. Review of particle physics PRD 98 (2018) 030001
54 D. L. Rainwater, R. Szalapski, and D. Zeppenfeld Probing color singlet exchange in $ \mathrm{Z} $ + two jet events at the CERN LHC PRD 54 (1996) 6680 hep-ph/9605444
55 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
56 H. Voss, A. Hocker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt TMVA, the toolkit for multivariate data analysis with ROOT in XIth International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACAT), p. 40 2007 [PoS(ACAT)040] physics/0703039
57 K. Doroba et al. The $ \mathrm{W}_\mathrm{L}\mathrm{W}_\mathrm{L} $ scattering at the LHC: improving the selection criteria PRD 86 (2012) 036011 1201.2768
58 F. Chollet Keras link
59 M. Abadi et al. Tensorflow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems 2016 Software available from tensorflow.org. \url http://tensorflow.org/
60 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PRL 117 (2016) 182002 1606.02625
61 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
62 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
63 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN