CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-HIN-21-007
Observation of the $\Upsilon$(3S) meson and sequential suppression of $\Upsilon$ states in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}= $ 5.02 TeV
Abstract: The production of $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons in lead-lead (PbPb) and proton-proton (pp) collisions is studied using the CMS detector at the LHC. Their nuclear modification factors, $R_{\textrm{AA}}$, derived from the ratio of yields measured in PbPb to pp collisions, are reported as functions of transverse momentum and PbPb collision centrality. The $\Upsilon$(3S) meson is observed for the first time in PbPb collisions. The suppression is found to be stronger for $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons compared to $\Upsilon$(2S) mesons, extending the pattern of sequential suppression of bottomonium states in nuclear collisions previously seen for the $\Upsilon$(1S) and $\Upsilon$(2S) states. The results provide new constraints on models describing the dynamics of quarkonium states in heavy ion collisions.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Figures References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Invariant mass distributions of selected dimuons in pp (left) and PbPb (right) collisions, for the kinematic range $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mu^{+} \mu^{-}} < $ 30 GeV/$c$ and $ {| y^{\mu^{+} \mu^{-}} |} < $ 2.4. The solid lines in both figures show the results of the fits to data, while the dashed and dotted lines represent the separate yields for each $\Upsilon$ state and background dimuons, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Invariant mass distributions of selected dimuons in pp (left) and PbPb (right) collisions, for the kinematic range $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mu^{+} \mu^{-}} < $ 30 GeV/$c$ and $ {| y^{\mu^{+} \mu^{-}} |} < $ 2.4. The solid lines in both figures show the results of the fits to data, while the dashed and dotted lines represent the separate yields for each $\Upsilon$ state and background dimuons, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Invariant mass distributions of selected dimuons in pp (left) and PbPb (right) collisions, for the kinematic range $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mu^{+} \mu^{-}} < $ 30 GeV/$c$ and $ {| y^{\mu^{+} \mu^{-}} |} < $ 2.4. The solid lines in both figures show the results of the fits to data, while the dashed and dotted lines represent the separate yields for each $\Upsilon$ state and background dimuons, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Measured ${R_ {\text {AA}}}$ for $\Upsilon$ states as functions of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $ (left) including the centrality integrated bin and ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (right). The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. In the left figure, the left-most box at unity combines the uncertainties of pp luminosity and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$, while the second (third) box corresponds to the uncertainty of pp yields for the $\Upsilon$(2S) ($\Upsilon$(3S)) state. The box at unity in the right plot combines the uncertainties of ${T_{{\text {AA}}}}$, pp luminosity, and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$. The results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18] and are not affected by the boxes at unity.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Measured ${R_ {\text {AA}}}$ for $\Upsilon$ states as functions of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $ (left) including the centrality integrated bin and ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (right). The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. In the left figure, the left-most box at unity combines the uncertainties of pp luminosity and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$, while the second (third) box corresponds to the uncertainty of pp yields for the $\Upsilon$(2S) ($\Upsilon$(3S)) state. The box at unity in the right plot combines the uncertainties of ${T_{{\text {AA}}}}$, pp luminosity, and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$. The results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18] and are not affected by the boxes at unity.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Measured ${R_ {\text {AA}}}$ for $\Upsilon$ states as functions of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $ (left) including the centrality integrated bin and ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (right). The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. In the left figure, the left-most box at unity combines the uncertainties of pp luminosity and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$, while the second (third) box corresponds to the uncertainty of pp yields for the $\Upsilon$(2S) ($\Upsilon$(3S)) state. The box at unity in the right plot combines the uncertainties of ${T_{{\text {AA}}}}$, pp luminosity, and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$. The results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18] and are not affected by the boxes at unity.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The double ratio of $\Upsilon$(3S)/$\Upsilon$(2S) as functions of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $ (left) and ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (right). The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes are the systematic uncertainties. The box at unity on the left figure shows the combined systematic and statistical uncertainties from pp data, which is common to all of the points.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The double ratio of $\Upsilon$(3S)/$\Upsilon$(2S) as functions of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $ (left) and ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (right). The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes are the systematic uncertainties. The box at unity on the left figure shows the combined systematic and statistical uncertainties from pp data, which is common to all of the points.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The double ratio of $\Upsilon$(3S)/$\Upsilon$(2S) as functions of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $ (left) and ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (right). The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes are the systematic uncertainties. The box at unity on the left figure shows the combined systematic and statistical uncertainties from pp data, which is common to all of the points.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Systematic uncertainties from various sources in pp and PbPb collisions listed in percentage. The global uncertainties are not included in the total uncertainties.
Summary
In summary, data from lead-lead (PbPb) and proton-proton (pp) collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV collected with the CMS detector were analyzed to measure the nuclear modification factors ($R_{\textrm{AA}}$) of $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons, and double ratios $\Upsilon$(3S)/$\Upsilon$(2S). The values of the observables are given as functions of $\Upsilon$ transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) and PbPb collision centrality. The $\Upsilon$(3S) meson is observed for the first time in PbPb collisions, and the amount of suppression is found to be stronger than for the $\Upsilon$(2S) meson. The values of $R_{\textrm{AA}}$ for both $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S) are observed to decrease gradually for more central collisions. On the other hand, the $R_{\textrm{AA}}$ values suggest at most a small increase with increasing $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ for the $\Upsilon$(3S) meson. The double ratios are found to be smaller than unity, showing a stronger suppression for the $\Upsilon$(3S) meson compared to the $\Upsilon$(2S) meson. No significant $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ dependence is observed for the double ratios $\Upsilon$(3S)/$\Upsilon$(2S), indicating the relative modification between the two states to be similar in the studied $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ region. Combined with previous measurements, the results in this note reveal the sequential suppression of $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons, which provides new constraints on the understanding of quarkonium suppression in heavy ion collisions.
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1:
Nuclear modification factors for the $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons as a function of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $, including the centrality integrated bin. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. The left-most box at unity combines the uncertainties of pp luminosity and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$, while the second (third) box corresponds to the uncertainty of pp yields for the $\Upsilon$(2S) ($\Upsilon$(3S)) state. Results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18]. The bands represent calculations from Ref. [7].

png pdf
Additional Figure 2:
Nuclear modification factors for the $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons as a function of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $, including the centrality integrated bin. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. The left-most box at unity combines the uncertainties of pp luminosity and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$, while the second (third) box corresponds to the uncertainty of pp yields for the $\Upsilon$(2S) ($\Upsilon$(3S)) state. Results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18]. The bands represent calculations from Ref. [6].

png pdf
Additional Figure 3:
Nuclear modification factors for the $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons as a function of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $, including the centrality integrated bin. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. The left-most box at unity combines the uncertainties of pp luminosity and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$, while the second (third) box corresponds to the uncertainty of pp yields for the $\Upsilon$(2S) ($\Upsilon$(3S)) state. Results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18]. The bands represent calculations from Ref. [50].

png pdf
Additional Figure 4:
Nuclear modification factors for the $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons as a function of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $, including the centrality integrated bin. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. The left-most box at unity combines the uncertainties of pp luminosity and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$, while the second (third) box corresponds to the uncertainty of pp yields for the $\Upsilon$(2S) ($\Upsilon$(3S) state. Results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18]. The bands represent calculations from Ref. [10].

png pdf
Additional Figure 5:
Nuclear modification factors for the $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons as a function of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. The box at unity represents the global uncertainty, which combines uncertainties from ${T_{{\text {AA}}}}$, pp luminosity, and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$. Results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18]. The bands represent calculations from Ref. [7].

png pdf
Additional Figure 6:
Nuclear modification factors for the $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons as a function of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. The box at unity represents the global uncertainty, which combines uncertainties from ${T_{{\text {AA}}}}$, pp luminosity, and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$. Results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18]. The bands represent calculations from Ref. [6].

png pdf
Additional Figure 7:
Nuclear modification factors for the $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons as a function of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. The box at unity represents the global uncertainty, which combines uncertainties from ${T_{{\text {AA}}}}$, pp luminosity, and PbPb ${N_{\mathrm {MB}}}$. Results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson are taken from Ref. [18]. The bands represent calculations from Ref. [10].

png pdf
Additional Figure 8:
The double ratio of $\Upsilon$(3S) /$\Upsilon$(2S) as functions of $\langle {N_{\text {part}}} \rangle $. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes are the systematic uncertainties. The box at unity shows the combined systematic and statistical uncertainties from pp data. The three different types of bands represent calculations from Ref. [7,6,50,10].

png pdf
Additional Figure 9:
The double ratio of $\Upsilon$(3S) /$\Upsilon$(2S) as functions of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes are the systematic uncertainties. The two bands represent calculations from Ref. [7,6,10].

png pdf
Additional Figure 10:
The nuclear modification factors for various quarkonium mesons as a function of quarkonium binding energy at $\sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}}=$ 5.02 TeV. The values for the binding energy of each quarkonium state are taken from Ref. [5]. The error bars and boxes represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. The results for the $\Upsilon$(1S) meson and charmonium states (J/$\psi$ and $\psi$(2S)) are taken from Ref. [18] and Ref. [51], respectively.

png pdf
Additional Figure 11:
The nuclear modification factors for the $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons as a function of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$. The vertical lines correspond to statistical uncertainties, while the boxes represent the systematic uncertainties. The solid (dashed) lines are the results of the fit to the ${R_ {\text {AA}}}$ values for the $\Upsilon$(2S) ($\Upsilon$(3S)) state using a constant and a linear function. A F-test [52] is performed to examine the significance of the dependence of the two functions. The significance for the preference of the linear fit is found to be more than 3 standard deviations for the $\Upsilon$(3S) meson and less than 2 standard deviations for the $\Upsilon$(2S) meson, thus verifying an increasing trend of the ${R_ {\text {AA}}}$ of $\Upsilon$(3S) with increasing ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$.
References
1 T. Matsui and H. Satz J/$\psi$ suppression by quark gluon plasma formation PLB 178 (1986) 416
2 M. Laine, O. Philipsen, P. Romatschke, and M. Tassler Real-time static potential in hot QCD JHEP 03 (2007) 054 hep-ph/0611300
3 N. Brambilla, J. Ghiglieri, A. Vairo, and P. Petreczky Static quark antiquark pairs at finite temperature PRD 78 (2008) 014017 0804.0993
4 N. Brambilla et al. Heavy quarkonium in a weakly coupled quark-gluon plasma below the melting temperature JHEP 09 (2010) 038 1007.4156
5 J.-P. Blaizot, D. De Boni, P. Faccioli, and G. Garberoglio Heavy quark bound states in a quark-gluon plasma: Dissociation and recombination NP A 946 (2016) 49 1503.03857
6 N. Brambilla et al. Bottomonium production in heavy-ion collisions using quantum trajectories: Differential observables and momentum anisotropy PRD 104 (2021) 094049 2107.06222
7 X. Yao et al. Coupled Boltzmann transport equations of heavy quarks and quarkonia in quark-gluon plasma JHEP 01 (2021) 046 2004.06746
8 N. Brambilla, M. A. Escobedo, J. Soto, and A. Vairo Quarkonium suppression in heavy ion collisions: an open quantum system approach PRD 96 (2017) 034021 1612.07248
9 A. Emerick, X. Zhao, and R. Rapp Bottomonia in the quark gluon plasma and their production at RHIC and LHC EPJA 48 (2012) 72 1111.6537
10 X. Du, R. Rapp, and M. He Color screening and regeneration of bottomonia in high-energy heavy-ion collisions PRC 96 (2017) 054901 1706.08670
11 STAR Collaboration Suppression of $ \Upsilon $ production in dAu and AuAu collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 200 GeV PLB 735 (2014) 127 1312.3675
12 A. Andronic et al. Heavy flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton-proton to heavy ion collisions EPJC 76 (2016) 107 1506.03981
13 ALICE Collaboration Studies of J/$\psi$ production at forward rapidity in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV JHEP 02 (2020) 041 1909.03158
14 R. R. Xiaojian Du Sequential Regeneration of Charmonia in Heavy-Ion Collisions Nuclear Physics A 943 (2015) 147 1504.00670
15 Anton Andronic, Peter Braun-Munzinger, Markus K. Kohler, Krzysztof Redlich, Johanna Stachel Transverse momentum distributions of charmonium states with the statistical hadronization model PLB 797 (2019) 134836 1901.09200
16 ALICE Collaboration $ \Upsilon $ suppression at forward rapidity in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV PLB 790 (2019) 89 1805.04387
17 ALICE Collaboration $ \Upsilon $ production and nuclear modification at forward rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV PLB 822 (2021) 136579 2011.05758
18 CMS Collaboration Measurement of nuclear modification factors of $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) mesons in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV PLB 790 (2019) 270 CMS-HIN-16-023
1805.09215
19 M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, and P. Steinberg Glauber modeling in high energy nuclear collisions Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 205 nucl-ex/0701025
20 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
21 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
22 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
23 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
24 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
25 CMS Collaboration Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
26 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
27 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
28 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018), no. 10, P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
29 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
30 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
31 CMS Collaboration Meaurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of $\Upsilon$(1S) and $\Upsilon$(2S) mesons in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV PLB 819 (2021) 136385 CMS-HIN-19-002
2006.07707
32 CMS Collaboration Charged-particle nuclear modification factors in PbPb and pPb collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV JHEP 04 (2017) 039 CMS-HIN-15-015
1611.01664
33 CMS Collaboration Transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions of charged hadrons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 0.9 and 2.36 TeV JHEP 02 (2010) 041 CMS-QCD-09-010
1002.0621
34 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
35 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA-8 tunes from underlying event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
36 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the $ \Upsilon $ polarizations in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8TeV JHEP 12 (2017) 110 1709.01301
37 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S), and $\Upsilon$(3S) polarizations in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRL 110 (2013) 081802 CMS-BPH-11-023
1209.2922
38 ALICE Collaboration First measurement of quarkonium polarization in nuclear collisions at the LHC PLB 815 (2021) 136146 2005.11128
39 I. P. Lokhtin et al. Heavy ion event generator HYDJET++ (hydrodynamics plus jets) CPC 180 (2009) 779 0809.2708
40 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
41 H. Voss, A. Hocker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt TMVA, the toolkit for multivariate data analysis with ROOT in XIth International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACAT), p. 40 2007 [PoS(ACAT)040] physics/0703039
42 M. J. Oreglia A study of the reactions $\psi' \to \gamma\gamma \psi$ PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1980 SLAC Report SLAC-R-236, see Appendix D
43 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of Particle Physics PTEP 2020 (2020), no. 8, 083C01
44 H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 (1974) 716
45 M. S. Barlett Tests of significance in factor analysis British Journal of Statistical Psychology 3 (1950) 77
46 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon trigger system in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 16 (2021) P07001 CMS-MUO-19-001
2102.04790
47 CMS Collaboration Luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV in 2017 at CMS CMS-PAS-LUM-19-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-19-001
48 CMS Collaboration Fragmentation of jets containing a prompt J/$\psi$ meson in PbPb and pp collisions at $ \sqrt{\smash[b]{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV PLB 825 (2022) 136842 CMS-HIN-19-007
2106.13235
49 C. Loizides, J. Kamin, and D. d'Enterria Improved Monte Carlo Glauber predictions at present and future nuclear colliders PRC 97 (2018) 054910 1710.07098
50 E. Ferreiro, J.-P. Lansberg Is bottomonium suppression in proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions at LHC energies due to the same JHEP 10 (2018) 094 1804.04474
51 CMS Collaboration Measurement of prompt and nonprompt charmonium suppression in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV EPJC 87 (2018) 509 1712.08959
52 A. Bacchi, V. S. Lamzin and K. S. Wilson A self-validation technique for protein structure refinement: the extended Hamilton test Acta Cryst. D52 (1996) 641
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN