CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-TOP-22-002 ; CERN-EP-2024-174
Search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark mediated by a Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV
Submitted to Phys. Rev. D
Abstract: A search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark (t) and the Higgs boson (H) is presented. The search is based on proton-proton collision data collected in 2016-2018 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with the CMS detector at the LHC, and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. Events containing a pair of leptons with the same-sign electric charge and at least one jet are considered. The results are used to constrain the branching fraction ($ \mathcal{B} $) of the top quark decaying to a Higgs boson and an up (u) or charm (c) quark. No significant excess above the estimated background was found. The observed (expected) upper limits at 95% confidence level are found to be 0.072% (0.059%) for $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{t}\to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u}) $ and 0.043% (0.062%) for $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{t}\to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c}) $. These results are combined with two other searches performed by the CMS Collaboration for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of top quarks and Higgs bosons in final states with a pair of photons or of bottom quarks. The resulting observed (expected) upper limits at 95% confidence level are 0.019% (0.027%) for $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{t}\to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u}) $ and 0.037% (0.035%) for $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{t}\to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c}) $. These results constitute the most stringent limits on these branching fractions to date.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Representative Feynman diagrams for the production modes considered: $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with the FCNC decay of the top quark to a Higgs boson and an up or charm quark (TT, left), and FCNC-associated production of a single top quark with a Higgs boson (ST, right).

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Representative Feynman diagrams for the production modes considered: $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with the FCNC decay of the top quark to a Higgs boson and an up or charm quark (TT, left), and FCNC-associated production of a single top quark with a Higgs boson (ST, right).

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Representative Feynman diagrams for the production modes considered: $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with the FCNC decay of the top quark to a Higgs boson and an up or charm quark (TT, left), and FCNC-associated production of a single top quark with a Higgs boson (ST, right).

png pdf
Figure 2:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the SR for 2016-2018 data are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic uncertainties in the estimated backgrounds.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the SR for 2016-2018 data are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic uncertainties in the estimated backgrounds.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the SR for 2016-2018 data are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic uncertainties in the estimated backgrounds.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the SR for 2016-2018 data are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic uncertainties in the estimated backgrounds.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the SR for 2016-2018 data are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic uncertainties in the estimated backgrounds.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The expected (dashed line) and observed (solid line) limits on the coupling strength (left) and on the branching fraction (right) are shown. The green (yellow) bands show the 68 (95)% confidence level ranges of the expected limits. The area to the right and above the solid line is excluded.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The expected (dashed line) and observed (solid line) limits on the coupling strength (left) and on the branching fraction (right) are shown. The green (yellow) bands show the 68 (95)% confidence level ranges of the expected limits. The area to the right and above the solid line is excluded.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The expected (dashed line) and observed (solid line) limits on the coupling strength (left) and on the branching fraction (right) are shown. The green (yellow) bands show the 68 (95)% confidence level ranges of the expected limits. The area to the right and above the solid line is excluded.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Summary of the observed and expected results from the three individual analyses and their combination. The dotted line shows the expected limits and the solid red lines shows the observed limits. The green and yellow bands show the 68 and 95% confidence level ranges of the expected limits.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the trigger thresholds used to select the analysis data set. The triggers require two isolated leptons, with different $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ requirements depending on their flavors. For each trigger, the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ threshold 1 corresponds to the lepton listed first, and the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ threshold 2 to the lepton listed last.

png pdf
Table 2:
Baseline analysis selections.

png pdf
Table 3:
Sources of systematic uncertainties in the yields of signal and background processes, as well as their impact on the yields in the SRs. The impact is expressed as a one standard deviation range.

png pdf
Table 4:
Observed and expected limits on the $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ branching fractions for the three searches in different Higgs boson decay channels performed by the CMS Collaboration. A statistical combination of the results is also reported.
Summary
This paper presents the results of a search for flavor changing neutral current interactions of the top quark (t), Higgs boson (H), and an up (u) or charm (c) quark. The search is performed in a final state with a pair of leptons of same electric charge and at least one jet. Expected yields from backgrounds emerging from detector effects are estimated by extrapolating yields observed in control regions using transfer factors measured in orthogonal data or simulated samples. Expected yields from standard model processes producing a pair of prompt leptons with the same-sign electric charge are estimated from simulation. Two trained boosted decision trees are used to evaluate and classify each event. No excess above the estimated background from standard model processes is observed. The observed (expected) upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the branching fraction are found to be 0.072% (0.059%) for $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u}) $ and 0.043% (0.062%) for $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c}) $. These limits can be cast as observed (expected) constraints on the anomalous coupling strengths: $ \kappa_{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}} < 0.071 (0.064) $ and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}} < 0.055 (0.065) $. A statistical combination of the results of this search with those of previous CMS publications searching for the same phenomena where the Higgs boson decays to a bottom quark-antiquark pair or to a pair of photons is performed. The results of this combination lead to observed (expected) exclusion limits at the 95% CL on the branching fractions $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u}) < 0.019% (0.027%) $ and $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c}) < 0.037% (0.035%) $ and represent the most stringent constraints on these interactions to date.
References
1 S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry PRD 2 (1970) 1285
2 M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 652
3 G. Eilam, J. L. Hewett, and A. Soni Rare decays of the top quark in the standard and two Higgs doublet models PRD 44 (1991) 1473
4 B. Mele, S. Petrarca, and A. Soddu A new evaluation of the decay width in the standard model PLB 435 (1998) 401
5 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra Top flavor-changing neutral interactions: theoretical expectations and experimental detection Acta Phys. Polon. B 35 (2004) 2695 hep-ph/0409342
6 C. Zhang and F. Maltoni Top-quark decay into Higgs boson and a light quark at next-to-leading order in QCD PRD 88 (2013) 054005 1305.7386
7 A. Azatov, M. Toharia, and L. Zhu Higgs mediated flavor changing neutral currents in warped extra dimensions PRD 80 (2009) 035016 0906.1990
8 A. Azatov, G. Panico, G. Perez, and Y. Soreq On the flavor structure of natural composite Higgs models \& top flavor violation JHEP 12 (2014) 082 1408.4525
9 S. Bejar, J. Guasch, and J. Sol \à Loop induced flavor changing neutral decays of the top quark in a general two Higgs doublet model NPB 600 (2001) 21 hep-ph/0011091
10 J. Guasch and J. Sol \à FCNC top quark decays in the MSSM: a door to SUSY physics in high luminosity colliders? NPB 562 (1999) 3
11 J. J. Cao et al. Supersymmetry-induced flavor-changing neutral-current top-quark processes at the CERN Large Hadron Collider PRD 75 (2007) 075021 hep-ph/0702264
12 J. Cao et al. SUSY induced top quark FCNC decay $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{c}\mathrm{H} $ after Run I of LHC EPJC 74 (2014) 3058 1404.1241
13 G. Eilam et al. Top-quark rare decay $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{c}\mathrm{H} $ in R-parity-violating SUSY PLB 510 (2001) 227 hep-ph/0102037
14 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra Effects of mixing with quark singlets PRD 67 (2003) 035003 hep-ph/0210112
15 W.-S. Hou Tree level t \ensuremath\to c h or h \ensuremath\to t c decays PLB 296 (1992) 179
16 I. Baum, G. Eilam, and S. Bar-Shalom Scalar flavor changing neutral currents and rare top quark decays in a two H iggs doublet model 'for the top quark' PRD 77 (2008) 113008 0802.2622
17 C. Kao, H.-Y. Cheng, W.-S. Hou, and J. Sayre Top decays with flavor changing neutral Higgs interactions at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 225 1112.1707
18 B. Altunkaynak et al. Flavor changing heavy Higgs interactions at the LHC PLB 751 (2015) 135 1506.00651
19 K.-F. Chen, W.-S. Hou, C. Kao, and M. Kohda When the Higgs meets the top: Search for $ t \to ch^0 $ at the LHC PLB 725 (2013) 378 1304.8037
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for top quark decays $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{q}\mathrm{H} $, with $ \mathrm{H} \to \gamma\gamma $, in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector JHEP 10 (2017) 129 1707.01404
21 ATLAS Collaboration Search for flavor-changing neutral currents in top quark decays $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 98 (2018) 032002 1805.03483
22 ATLAS Collaboration Search for top-quark decays $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{q} $ with 36 fb$ ^{-1} $ of pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 05 (2019) 123 1812.11568
23 CMS Collaboration Search for the flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark and the Higgs boson which decays into a pair of b quarks at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2018) 102 CMS-TOP-17-003
1712.02399
24 CMS Collaboration Search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark and the Higgs boson decaying to a bottom quark-antiquark pair at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV JHEP 02 (2022) 169 CMS-TOP-19-002
2112.09734
25 CMS Collaboration Search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark and Higgs boson in final states with two photons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV PRL 129 (2022) 032001 CMS-TOP-20-007
2111.02219
26 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
27 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13\,TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
28 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
29 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
30 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
31 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
32 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A Positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
33 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi $ W^+ W^- $, $ W Z $ and $ Z Z $ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2 EPJC 74 (2014) 2702 1311.1365
34 E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and A. Vicini Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM JHEP 02 (2012) 088 1111.2854
35 H. B. Hartanto, B. Jager, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX PRD 91 (2015) 094003 1501.04498
36 S. Bolognesi et al. On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC PRD 86 (2012) 095031 1208.4018
37 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
38 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
39 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
40 R. D. Ball et al. Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 1706.00428
41 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
42 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
43 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
44 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
45 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
46 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
47 \GEANTfour Collaboration GEANT 4 --- a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
48 A. Alloul et al. Feynrules 2.0 --- a complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 1310.1921
49 C. Degrande et al. UFO --- the universal FeynRules output Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201 1108.2040
50 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top$ ++ $: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
51 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
52 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
53 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics in same-sign dilepton events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 13\,\text {TeV} $ EPJC 76 (2016) 439 CMS-SUS-15-008
1605.03171
54 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with jets and two same-sign or at least three charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 80 (2020)
55 CMS Collaboration Search for production of four top quarks in final states with same-sign or multiple leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 80 (2020) 75 CMS-TOP-18-003
1908.06463
56 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
57 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
58 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
59 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
60 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
61 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
62 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
63 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
64 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
65 E. Bols et al. Jet flavour classification using deepjet JINST 15 (2020) P12012 2008.10519
66 CMS Collaboration Performance of the DeepJet b tagging algorithm using 41.9 fb$ ^{-1} $ of data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with Phase-1 CMS detector CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2018-058, 2018
CDS
67 CMS Collaboration A new calibration method for charm jet identification validated with proton-proton collision events at $ \sqrt{s} $ =13 TeV JINST 17 (2022) P03014 CMS-BTV-20-001
2111.03027
68 T. Chen and C. Guestrin Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '16, New York, 2016
link
69 F. Pedregosa et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python J. Mach. Learn. research 12 (2011) 2825 1201.0490
70 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993) 219
71 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
72 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
73 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
74 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive and differential WZ production cross sections, polarization angles, and triple gauge couplings in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2022) 032 CMS-SMP-20-014
2110.11231
75 B. Biedermann, A. Denner, and M. Pellen Complete NLO corrections to W$ ^{+} $W$ ^{+} $ scattering and its irreducible background at the LHC JHEP 10 (2017) 124 1708.00268
76 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Collaboration. D. de Florian et al. Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs. CERN, 2017
link
77 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
78 S. Catani, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, and P. Nason Soft gluon resummation for Higgs boson production at hadron colliders JHEP 07 (2003) 028 hep-ph/0306211
79 M. Cacciari et al. The t anti-t cross-section at 1.8-TeV and 1.96-TeV: A Study of the systematics due to parton densities and scale dependence JHEP 04 (2004) 068 hep-ph/0303085
80 A. Kalogeropoulos and J. Alwall The syscalc code: A tool to derive theoretical systematic uncertainties 1801.08401
81 CMS Collaboration The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: \textscCombine Submitted to Comput. Softw. Big Sci, 2024 CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
82 W. Verkerke and D. P. Kirkby The RooFit toolkit for data modeling physics/0306116
83 L. Moneta et al. The RooStats Project PoS ACAT (2010) 057
link
1009.1003
84 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435
85 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ \text{CL}_{s} $ technique J. Physics G 28 (2002) 2693
86 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
87 ATLAS, CMS, LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 technical report, CERN, 2011
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN