CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-25-010 ; CERN-EP-2025-301
Search for heavy long-lived charged particles with level-1 trigger scouting data from proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13.6 TeV
Submitted to Physics Letters B
Abstract: A search for heavy long-lived charged particles at the LHC is presented. Particles interacting with the CMS muon detector across several bunch crossings are searched for using a data sample of proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13.6 TeV collected with the CMS detector in 2024, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.7 fb$ ^{-1} $. This is the first search relying on the novel level-1 trigger scouting data set collected without any trigger selection, allowing correlations between bunch crossings to be analyzed. The results are interpreted as upper limits on the cross sections of several benchmark processes with pair production of heavy long-lived charged particles. Upper limits on the fiducial cross section of a heavy long-lived charged particle with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 500 GeV and $ |\eta| < $ 0.83 are also set in different ranges of $ \beta=v/c $. This analysis is a crucial proof of concept for the level-1 trigger data scouting system and complements existing searches for heavy long-lived charged particles by extending the sensitivity to lower $ \beta $ values.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The $ R $--$ z $ projection of a quarter of the CMS barrel muon system, where $ R $ is the radial distance from the beamline.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Generated $ \beta $ distributions of the fourth-generation $ \tau^{'} $ leptons from nonresonant DY production, for various $ \tau^{'} $ masses $ m $. The histograms are normalized to unity.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of the dimuon invariant mass (left) and per-track stub multiplicity (right) for events with two opposite-sign modified kBMTF tracks reconstructed from individual stubs in the same or different BXs. The invariant mass is required to be greater than 70 GeV in the stub multiplicity distributions to increase the purity. The muons are selected with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 15 GeV and $ |\eta| < $ 0.83. The nonprompt-background contribution is estimated by rescaling the data with two same-sign modified kBMTF tracks. The statistical uncertainty is indicated in the gray shaded area. The agreement between simulation and data is good by construction since the efficiency, energy scale, and energy smearing corrections derived from the same events have been applied.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distributions of the dimuon invariant mass (left) and per-track stub multiplicity (right) for events with two opposite-sign modified kBMTF tracks reconstructed from individual stubs in the same or different BXs. The invariant mass is required to be greater than 70 GeV in the stub multiplicity distributions to increase the purity. The muons are selected with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 15 GeV and $ |\eta| < $ 0.83. The nonprompt-background contribution is estimated by rescaling the data with two same-sign modified kBMTF tracks. The statistical uncertainty is indicated in the gray shaded area. The agreement between simulation and data is good by construction since the efficiency, energy scale, and energy smearing corrections derived from the same events have been applied.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distributions of the dimuon invariant mass (left) and per-track stub multiplicity (right) for events with two opposite-sign modified kBMTF tracks reconstructed from individual stubs in the same or different BXs. The invariant mass is required to be greater than 70 GeV in the stub multiplicity distributions to increase the purity. The muons are selected with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 15 GeV and $ |\eta| < $ 0.83. The nonprompt-background contribution is estimated by rescaling the data with two same-sign modified kBMTF tracks. The statistical uncertainty is indicated in the gray shaded area. The agreement between simulation and data is good by construction since the efficiency, energy scale, and energy smearing corrections derived from the same events have been applied.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Fractions of the BX signatures of tracks reconstructed with the modified kBMTF algorithm as functions of the generated particle $ \beta $. This figure corresponds to the nonresonant fourth-generation lepton signal model with a mixture of HSCP masses between 1 and 6 TeV. The filled histograms are stacked to sum to unity. The blue histograms correspond to tracks reconstructed in a single BX. Different shades represent different BXs with respect to the collision BX ($ \mathrm{BX} = i $), as indicated in parentheses in the legend. The orange histograms correspond to tracks reconstructed over 2 BXs, with different shades corresponding to different BXs with respect to the collision BX. Different shades of the same color are indistinguishable experimentally since the production BX cannot be determined. The red and purple histograms represent tracks reconstructed over 3 or at least 4 BXs, respectively. The dashed line indicates the efficiency for the reconstructed tracks to satisfy the single-muon HLT selection. For $ \beta < $ 0.15, the efficiency goes to zero because the particles get stopped in the detector. For $ \beta > $ 0.8, the particles are increasingly reconstructed in the same BX and the HLT selection is fully efficient.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Low-track-quality validation region distributions for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The signal is shown for a few mass hypotheses of the nonresonant fourth-generation lepton model, using a production cross section of 1\unitpb. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Low-track-quality validation region distributions for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The signal is shown for a few mass hypotheses of the nonresonant fourth-generation lepton model, using a production cross section of 1\unitpb. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Low-track-quality validation region distributions for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The signal is shown for a few mass hypotheses of the nonresonant fourth-generation lepton model, using a production cross section of 1\unitpb. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Low-track-quality validation region distributions for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The signal is shown for a few mass hypotheses of the nonresonant fourth-generation lepton model, using a production cross section of 1\unitpb. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Noncolliding validation region distributions for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Noncolliding validation region distributions for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Noncolliding validation region distributions for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Noncolliding validation region distributions for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 7:
The $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ distributions in the signal region for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The signal is shown for a few mass hypotheses of the nonresonant fourth-generation lepton model, using a production cross section of 1\unitpb. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
The $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ distributions in the signal region for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The signal is shown for a few mass hypotheses of the nonresonant fourth-generation lepton model, using a production cross section of 1\unitpb. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
The $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ distributions in the signal region for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The signal is shown for a few mass hypotheses of the nonresonant fourth-generation lepton model, using a production cross section of 1\unitpb. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 7-c:
The $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ distributions in the signal region for the categories with tracks across $ > $2 ( = $ $2, = $ $2) BXs without (with, without) additional track requirement are shown in the upper (center, lower) part of the figure. The expected background distributions are the result of the maximum likelihood fit. The uncertainty bands account for all sources of background uncertainty, systematic as well as statistical, after the maximum likelihood fit. The lower panels show the observed to expected ratio. The signal is shown for a few mass hypotheses of the nonresonant fourth-generation lepton model, using a production cross section of 1\unitpb. The last $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins include the overflow.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Observed (solid line with markers) and expected (dashed black line) upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section of heavy fourth-generation leptons through nonresonant DY production (left) and of a gluino $ R $-hadron pair with $ f= $ 1 (right). The inner (yellow) and the outer (blue) bands indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The expected limits for the combinations of 3-stub (dashed purple line) and 4-stub (dashed-red line) categories are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Observed (solid line with markers) and expected (dashed black line) upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section of heavy fourth-generation leptons through nonresonant DY production (left) and of a gluino $ R $-hadron pair with $ f= $ 1 (right). The inner (yellow) and the outer (blue) bands indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The expected limits for the combinations of 3-stub (dashed purple line) and 4-stub (dashed-red line) categories are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Observed (solid line with markers) and expected (dashed black line) upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section of heavy fourth-generation leptons through nonresonant DY production (left) and of a gluino $ R $-hadron pair with $ f= $ 1 (right). The inner (yellow) and the outer (blue) bands indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The expected limits for the combinations of 3-stub (dashed purple line) and 4-stub (dashed-red line) categories are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the production cross section of heavy fourth-generation leptons through $ \mathrm{Z}^{'} $ boson decays. Lines indicate different values of the ratio of $ \mathrm{Z}^{'} $ to $ \tau^{'} $ masses, for which $ \beta $ values are typically similar. Signal hypotheses with 2 $ m_{\tau^{'}} < m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} < 3m_{\tau^{'}} $ are probed. For $ m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}} > 3m_{\tau^{'}} $, the HSCPs typically have high $ \beta $ and are reconstructed in the same BX. The lowest limits are obtained for $ m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}}/m_{\tau^{'}}\approx $ 2.15 (2.60), for which HSCPs are dominantly produced with $ \beta\approx $ 0.2 (0.6). The higher limits for $ m_{\mathrm{Z}^{'}}/m_{\tau^{'}}\approx $ 2.30 are related to the low analysis acceptance for HSCPs produced with $ \beta\approx $ 0.5 and largely reconstructed in a single BX.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the fiducial cross section of a heavy particle leaving a signature in the muon detector with $ |\eta| < $ 0.83, $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 500 GeV, in bins of $ \beta $. The inner (yellow) and the outer (blue) bands indicate the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The expected limits for groups of categories corresponding to a different number of muon detector layers crossed per BX are also shown with colored dashed lines. The limited sensitivity around $ \beta= $ 0.5 corresponds to a loss of acceptance from particles reconstructed entirely in the BX that followed the collision.

png pdf
Figure 11:
Schematic definition of the 3-stub categories with tracks across $ > $2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
Schematic definition of the 3-stub categories with tracks across $ > $2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
Schematic definition of the 3-stub categories with tracks across $ > $2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 11-c:
Schematic definition of the 3-stub categories with tracks across $ > $2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 11-d:
Schematic definition of the 3-stub categories with tracks across $ > $2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 12:
Schematic definition of the 4-stub categories with tracks across $ > $2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 12-a:
Schematic definition of the 4-stub categories with tracks across $ > $2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 12-b:
Schematic definition of the 4-stub categories with tracks across $ > $2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 12-c:
Schematic definition of the 4-stub categories with tracks across $ > $2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 13:
Schematic definition of the categories with tracks across 2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 13-a:
Schematic definition of the categories with tracks across 2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 13-b:
Schematic definition of the categories with tracks across 2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 13-c:
Schematic definition of the categories with tracks across 2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 13-d:
Schematic definition of the categories with tracks across 2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 13-e:
Schematic definition of the categories with tracks across 2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 13-f:
Schematic definition of the categories with tracks across 2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 13-g:
Schematic definition of the categories with tracks across 2 BXs.

png pdf
Figure 14:
Schematic definition of the asynchronous orderings used to estimate the backgrounds in the BX1234 category. The upper (lower) half includes orderings with the first (last) stub in MB1 (MB4).

png pdf
Figure 14-a:
Schematic definition of the asynchronous orderings used to estimate the backgrounds in the BX1234 category. The upper (lower) half includes orderings with the first (last) stub in MB1 (MB4).

png pdf
Figure 14-b:
Schematic definition of the asynchronous orderings used to estimate the backgrounds in the BX1234 category. The upper (lower) half includes orderings with the first (last) stub in MB1 (MB4).

png pdf
Figure 15:
Schematic definition of the asynchronous orderings used to estimate the backgrounds in the BX1112 category. The left (right) diagram shows the ordering where the stub detected in a different BX than the other three stubs is in MB2 (MB3).

png pdf
Figure 15-a:
Schematic definition of the asynchronous orderings used to estimate the backgrounds in the BX1112 category. The left (right) diagram shows the ordering where the stub detected in a different BX than the other three stubs is in MB2 (MB3).

png pdf
Figure 15-b:
Schematic definition of the asynchronous orderings used to estimate the backgrounds in the BX1112 category. The left (right) diagram shows the ordering where the stub detected in a different BX than the other three stubs is in MB2 (MB3).
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Categories based on muon detector layers with stubs and speed expressed as the number of crossed layers divided by the number of BXs spent to cross them. The BX1234 category includes 4-stub tracks for which the 4 stubs are in 4 subsequent BXs. For 3-stub (4-stub) tracks, the BX123 categories correspond to 3 (4) stubs in 3 different BXs across a range of 3 BXs, whereas the BX124/134 categories correspond to 3 (4) stubs in 3 different BXs across a range of 4 BXs. The 4-stub category BX1112 (1122, 1222) corresponds to 3 (2, 1) stubs in the first BX, and 1 (2, 3) stubs in the next BX. Similarly, the 3-stub categories BX112 (122) correspond to 2 (1) stubs in the first BX and 1 (2) stub in the next BX. The 3-stub categories are further separated into fast and slow subcategories: those denoted ``fast" feature a track with the first stub in MB1 and the last one in MB4, corresponding to a longer distance crossed in the same amount of time as their ``slow" counterparts, which do have exactly one stub within the innermost and outermost detector layers. The symbol $ \oplus $ represents the exclusive ``or", whereas $ \land $ is the logical ``and".

png pdf
Table 2:
Definition of asynchronous track orderings used to build the alternative $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ distributions corresponding to a $ \pm $ 1 s.d. of the background systematic uncertainty.
Summary
A search for long-lived massive charged particles has been presented, exploiting a muon-like signature in the barrel muon detectors spread across several LHC proton bunch crossings. This is the first time that an analysis relies on the novel CMS level-1 trigger scouting data set, for which no trigger selection is applied. A method based on control samples in data is used to estimate the backgrounds, relying on tracks not compatible in time with the expectations from a slow particle exiting the detector. No significant excess of data above the predicted standard model backgrounds is observed. Upper limits are set on the production cross section of heavy stable charged particles in several models, and fiducial upper limits on the production cross section for different $ \beta=v/c $ ranges are also set for a model-independent interpretation. The analysis has unique sensitivity to particles with 0.15 $ \lesssim \beta \lesssim $ 0.5, which are challenging to trigger on, and to neutral particles that acquire a charge when crossing the detector, which do not leave an ionization-loss signature in the tracker. Upper limits as low as 3.5\unitfb at 95% confidence level are set on the fiducial production cross section of lepton-like charged particles with $ |\eta| < $ 0.83 and $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 500 GeV, in several bins of $ \beta $, extending the reach of the existing searches to higher masses and lower values of $ \beta $.
References
1 M. Fairbairn et al. Stable massive particles at colliders Phys. Rept. 438 (2007) 1 hep-ph/0611040
2 C. W. Bauer et al. Supermodels for early LHC PLB 690 (2010) 280 0909.5213
3 ALEPH Collaboration Search for pair production of longlived heavy charged particles in $ \mathrm{e}^+ \mathrm{e}^- $ annihilation PLB 405 (1997) 379 hep-ex/9706013
4 DELPHI Collaboration Search for heavy stable and longlived particles in $ \mathrm{e}^+ \mathrm{e}^- $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 189 GeV PLB 478 (2000) 65 hep-ex/0103038
5 L3 Collaboration Search for heavy neutral and charged leptons in $ \mathrm{e}^+ \mathrm{e}^- $ annihilation at LEP PLB 517 (2001) 75 hep-ex/0107015
6 OPAL Collaboration Search for stable and longlived massive charged particles in $ \mathrm{e}^+ \mathrm{e}^- $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 130 GeV to 209 GeV PLB 572 (2003) 8 hep-ex/0305031
7 H1 Collaboration Measurement of anti-deuteron photoproduction and a search for heavy stable charged particles at HERA EPJC 36 (2004) 413 hep-ex/0403056
8 CDF Collaboration Search for long-lived massive charged particles in 1.96 TeV $ \bar{\mathrm{p}}\mathrm{p} $ collisions PRL 103 (2009) 021802 0902.1266
9 D0 Collaboration Search for long-lived charged massive particles with the D0 detector PRL 102 (2009) 161802 0809.4472
10 D0 Collaboration A search for charged massive long-lived particles PRL 108 (2012) 121802 1110.3302
11 D0 Collaboration Search for charged massive long-lived particles at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 1.96 TeV PRD 87 (2013) 052011 1211.2466
12 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy long-lived charged particles with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PLB 703 (2011) 428 1106.4495
13 ATLAS Collaboration Search for stable hadronising squarks and gluinos with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC PLB 701 (2011) 1 1103.1984
14 ATLAS Collaboration Search for massive long-lived highly ionising particles with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 698 (2011) 353 1102.0459
15 ATLAS Collaboration Searches for heavy long-lived sleptons and $ R $-hadrons with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PLB 720 (2013) 277 1211.1597
16 ATLAS Collaboration Search for long-lived, multi-charged particles in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector PLB 722 (2013) 305 1301.5272
17 ATLAS Collaboration Searches for heavy long-lived charged particles with the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 01 (2015) 068 1411.6795
18 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy long-lived multi-charged particles in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 362 1504.04188
19 ATLAS Collaboration Search for metastable heavy charged particles with large ionisation energy loss in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS experiment EPJC 75 (2015) 407 1506.05332
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for metastable heavy charged particles with large ionization energy loss in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the ATLAS experiment PRD 93 (2016) 112015 1604.04520
21 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy long-lived charged $ R $-hadrons with the ATLAS detector in 3.2 fb$ ^{-1} $ of proton--proton collision data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PLB 760 (2016) 647 1606.05129
22 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy stable charged particles in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 03 (2011) 024 CMS-EXO-10-011
1101.1645
23 CMS Collaboration Search for fractionally charged particles in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PRD 87 (2013) 092008 CMS-EXO-11-074
1210.2311
24 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy long-lived charged particles in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PLB 713 (2012) 408 CMS-EXO-11-022
1205.0272
25 CMS Collaboration Searches for long-lived charged particles in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 07 (2013) 122 CMS-EXO-12-026
1305.0491
26 CMS Collaboration Search for long-lived charged particles in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt s= $ 13 TeV PRD 94 (2016) 112004 CMS-EXO-15-010
1609.08382
27 CMS Collaboration Search for decays of stopped exotic long-lived particles produced in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 05 (2018) 127 CMS-EXO-16-004
1801.00359
28 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy, long-lived, charged particles with large ionisation energy loss in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the ATLAS experiment and the full Run 2 dataset JHEP 06 (2023) 158 2205.06013
29 CMS Collaboration Search for fractionally charged particles in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PRL 134 (2025) 131802 CMS-EXO-19-006
2402.09932
30 CMS Collaboration Search for heavy long-lived charged particles with large ionization energy loss in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 04 (2025) 109 CMS-EXO-18-002
2410.09164
31 ATLAS Collaboration Search for long-lived charged particles using large specific ionisation loss and time of flight in 140 fb$ ^{-1} $ of pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 07 (2025) 140 2502.06694
32 CMS Collaboration The Phase-2 upgrade of the CMS Level-1 trigger CMS Technical Design Report CERN-LHCC-2020-004; CMS-TDR-021, 2020
CDS
33 CMS Collaboration Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3 JINST 19 (2024) P05064 CMS-PRF-21-001
2309.05466
34 M. Migliorini 40\unitMHz scouting at the CMS experiment PhD thesis, Padua University, CERN-THESIS-2024-288, 2024
link
35 R. Ardino Search for rare boson decays with the CMS detector at LHC and the CMS Level-1 trigger Data Scouting PhD thesis, Padua University, CERN-THESIS-2024-303, 2024
link
36 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis link
37 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
38 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
39 CMS Collaboration The CMS barrel muon trigger upgrade JINST 12 (2017) C01095
40 G. F. Giudice, M. McCullough, and D. Teresi dE/dx from boosted long-lived particles JHEP 08 (2022) 012 2205.04473
41 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
42 G. F. Giudice and A. Romanino Split supersymmetry NPB 699 (2004) 65 hep-ph/0406088
43 N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC JHEP 06 (2005) 073 hep-th/0405159
44 A. C. Kraan Interactions of heavy stable hadronizing particles EPJC 37 (2004) 91 hep-ex/0404001
45 R. Mackeprang and A. Rizzi Interactions of coloured heavy stable particles in matter EPJC 50 (2007) 353 hep-ph/0612161
46 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
47 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
48 R. D. Ball et al. Unbiased global determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties at NNLO and at LO NPB 855 (2012) 153 1107.2652
49 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions with QED corrections NPB 877 (2013) 290 1308.0598
50 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
51 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
52 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4 --- a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
53 CMS Collaboration Bunch crossing identification studies for the CMS muon barrel local trigger CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2025-008, 2025
CDS
54 CMS Collaboration The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 8 (2024) 19 CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
55 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
56 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The $ \text{CL}_\text{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
57 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN