CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-BPH-22-009 ; CERN-EP-2024-155
Measurement of the polarizations of prompt and non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ mesons produced in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
Phys. Lett. B 858 (2024) 139044
Abstract: The polarizations of prompt and non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ mesons are measured in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, using data samples collected by the CMS experiment in 2017 and 2018, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 103.3 fb$ ^{-1} $. Based on the analysis of the dimuon decay angular distributions in the helicity frame, the polar anisotropy, $ \lambda_\vartheta $, is measured as a function of the transverse momentum, $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, of the charmonium states, in the 25-120 and 20-100 GeV ranges for the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $, respectively. The non-prompt polarizations agree with predictions based on the hypothesis that, for $ p_{\mathrm{T}} \gtrsim $ 25 GeV, the non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ are predominantly produced in two-body B meson decays. The prompt results clearly exclude strong transverse polarizations, even for $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ exceeding 30 times the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ mass, where $ \lambda_\vartheta $ tends to an asymptotic value around 0.3. Taken together with previous measurements, by CMS and LHCb at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV, the prompt polarizations show a significant variation with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, at low $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Measured dimuon decay length vs. mass distributions for the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) samples, showing the rectangular regions used in the analysis. The prompt and non-prompt signal regions are labeled PRS and NPS, respectively, while the remaining regions are non-signal (sideband) regions.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Measured dimuon decay length vs. mass distributions for the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) samples, showing the rectangular regions used in the analysis. The prompt and non-prompt signal regions are labeled PRS and NPS, respectively, while the remaining regions are non-signal (sideband) regions.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Measured dimuon decay length vs. mass distributions for the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) samples, showing the rectangular regions used in the analysis. The prompt and non-prompt signal regions are labeled PRS and NPS, respectively, while the remaining regions are non-signal (sideband) regions.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Dimuon mass distributions measured for the non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) event samples, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins. The total fit function (blue), the sum of the two CB functions and, only in the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ case, the Gaussian function (red), and the background continuum (black) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Dimuon mass distributions measured for the non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) event samples, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins. The total fit function (blue), the sum of the two CB functions and, only in the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ case, the Gaussian function (red), and the background continuum (black) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Dimuon mass distributions measured for the non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) event samples, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins. The total fit function (blue), the sum of the two CB functions and, only in the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ case, the Gaussian function (red), and the background continuum (black) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Fraction of events in the NPS region due to continuum muon pairs, versus $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, for the non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ events.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Dimuon mass distributions measured for the prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) event samples, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins. The total fit function (blue), the sum of the two CB functions and (only in the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ case) the Gaussian function (red), and the background continuum (black) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Dimuon mass distributions measured for the prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) event samples, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins. The total fit function (blue), the sum of the two CB functions and (only in the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ case) the Gaussian function (red), and the background continuum (black) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Dimuon mass distributions measured for the prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) event samples, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins. The total fit function (blue), the sum of the two CB functions and (only in the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ case) the Gaussian function (red), and the background continuum (black) are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Fraction of events in the PRS region due to continuum muon pairs, versus $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, for the prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ events.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Dimuon decay length distributions, integrated in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, measured for the sideband mass ranges mentioned in the legends, in the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) cases.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Dimuon decay length distributions, integrated in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, measured for the sideband mass ranges mentioned in the legends, in the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) cases.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Dimuon decay length distributions, integrated in $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, measured for the sideband mass ranges mentioned in the legends, in the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) cases.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Dimuon decay length distributions measured for the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) cases, in their mass signal windows, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins. The vertical dashed lines mark the limits of the PR and NP ranges. The total fit function, as well as the individual contributions, are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Dimuon decay length distributions measured for the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) cases, in their mass signal windows, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins. The vertical dashed lines mark the limits of the PR and NP ranges. The total fit function, as well as the individual contributions, are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Dimuon decay length distributions measured for the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) cases, in their mass signal windows, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins. The vertical dashed lines mark the limits of the PR and NP ranges. The total fit function, as well as the individual contributions, are also shown.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Variation with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ of the fraction of events in the PRS region from non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ mesons.

png pdf
Figure 9:
$ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ distributions measured in the mass sidebands (shifted horizontally for better visibility), and their weighted average, for the prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and non-prompt $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) samples, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
$ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ distributions measured in the mass sidebands (shifted horizontally for better visibility), and their weighted average, for the prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and non-prompt $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) samples, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
$ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ distributions measured in the mass sidebands (shifted horizontally for better visibility), and their weighted average, for the prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and non-prompt $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) samples, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 10:
$ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ distributions measured in the PRS $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and NPS $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) samples, of the terms of Eqs. (4) and (3), respectively, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
$ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ distributions measured in the PRS $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and NPS $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) samples, of the terms of Eqs. (4) and (3), respectively, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
$ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ distributions measured in the PRS $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and NPS $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) samples, of the terms of Eqs. (4) and (3), respectively, in the mentioned $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 11:
Ratios between the measured and simulated $ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ distributions for the prompt and non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) events, in the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins mentioned in the legends. The curves represent fits using Eq. (2) and excluding the largest $ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
Ratios between the measured and simulated $ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ distributions for the prompt and non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) events, in the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins mentioned in the legends. The curves represent fits using Eq. (2) and excluding the largest $ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
Ratios between the measured and simulated $ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ distributions for the prompt and non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) events, in the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ bins mentioned in the legends. The curves represent fits using Eq. (2) and excluding the largest $ |\cos\vartheta_\mathrm{HX}| $ bins.

png pdf
Figure 12:
The $ \lambda_\vartheta $ parameter measured, as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, for non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ mesons. The vertical bars represent the total uncertainties. Predicted polarizations of $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ mesons produced in $ {\mathrm{B}} \to {\mathrm{J}/\psi} \, X $ decays are shown for three calculations [48,49], discussed in the text. The low-$ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ CDF measurement [50] is also shown.

png pdf
Figure 13:
The $ \lambda_\vartheta $ parameter measured, as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, for prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) mesons, in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, compared to measurements made at 7 TeV by CMS [10] and LHCb [11,12]. The vertical bars represent the total uncertainties. The curves on the left panel are described in the text.

png pdf
Figure 13-a:
The $ \lambda_\vartheta $ parameter measured, as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, for prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) mesons, in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, compared to measurements made at 7 TeV by CMS [10] and LHCb [11,12]. The vertical bars represent the total uncertainties. The curves on the left panel are described in the text.

png pdf
Figure 13-b:
The $ \lambda_\vartheta $ parameter measured, as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, for prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ (left) and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ (right) mesons, in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV, compared to measurements made at 7 TeV by CMS [10] and LHCb [11,12]. The vertical bars represent the total uncertainties. The curves on the left panel are described in the text.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The $ \lambda_\vartheta $ values measured in the HX frame, in bins of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, for the prompt and non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ mesons, including the statistical (stat), systematic (syst), and total uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 2:
The $ \lambda_\vartheta $ values measured in the HX frame, as a function of $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, for the prompt and non-prompt $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ mesons, indicating the statistical (stat), systematic (syst), and total uncertainties.
Summary
The prompt and non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)}$ $\lambda_\vartheta $ polarization parameters have been measured, in the helicity frame and for the $ |y| < $ 1.25 interval, using a sample of pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV collected in 2017 and 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 103.3 fb$ ^{-1} $. The results cover $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ ranges significantly broader than previous measurements: 25-120 and 20-100 GeV, for the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $, respectively. The non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $\psi \text{(2S)} $ polarization measurements are compatible with each other, regarding the $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ dependence and the overall magnitude, plateauing at $ \lambda_\vartheta \approx - $0.2 for $ p_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 30 GeV. The measured trends agree with predictions based on the hypothesis that these charmonia are predominantly produced by two-body B meson decays, through colour-singlet processes. Regarding the prompt results, we see no evidence of strong transverse polarizations ($ \lambda_\vartheta $ approaching $ + $1), even at $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ values exceeding 30 times the $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ mass. Using NRQCD concepts, there is no evidence that, at very high $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, the transversely polarized $ ^3 S_1^{[8]} $ and $ ^3 P_J^{[8]} $ octet terms become dominant with respect to the unpolarized $ ^1 S_0^{[8]} $ octet. Taken together with previous CMS and LHCb measurements, covering a lower $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ domain, we see a significant variation of the prompt polarizations with $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $, at low $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $. These results will significantly constrain phenomenological analyses of charmonium production, so far mostly focused on $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $-differential cross sections.
References
1 Quarkonium Working Group Collaboration, N. Brambilla et al. Heavy quarkonium physics CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, CERN-2005-005, 2005
link
2 N. Brambilla et al. Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities EPJC 71 (2011) 1534 1010.5827
3 G. Bodwin, E. Braaten, and P. Lepage Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium PRD 51 (1995) 1125 hep-ph/9407339
4 R. Baier and R. Rückl Hadronic production of $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $ \Upsilon $: transverse momentum distributions PLB 102 (1981) 364
5 J.-P. Lansberg On the mechanisms of heavy-quarkonium hadroproduction EPJC 61 (2009) 693 0811.4005
6 V. D. Barger, W.-Y. Keung, and R. J. N. Phillips On $ \psi $ and $ \Upsilon $ production via gluons PLB 91 (1980) 253
7 V. D. Barger, W.-Y. Keung, and R. J. N. Phillips Hadroproduction of $ \psi $ and $ \Upsilon $ Z. Phys. C 6 (1980) 169
8 CDF Collaboration $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ production in $ \mathrm{p}\overline{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.8 TeV PRL 79 (1997) 572
9 CDF Collaboration Measurements of angular distributions of muons from $ \Upsilon $ meson decays in $ \mathrm{p}\overline{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRL 108 (2012) 151802 1112.1591
10 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ polarizations in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PLB 727 (2013) 381 CMS-BPH-13-003
1307.6070
11 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ polarization in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV EPJC 73 (2013) 2631 1307.6379
12 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ polarisation in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 2872 1403.1339
13 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \Upsilon $(1S), $ \Upsilon $(2S), and $ \Upsilon $(3S) polarizations in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRL 110 (2013) 081802 CMS-BPH-11-023
1209.2922
14 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the $ \Upsilon $ polarizations in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 12 (2017) 110 1709.01301
15 M. Butenschön and B. A. Kniehl $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ polarization at Tevatron and LHC: nonrelativistic-QCD factorization at the crossroads PRL 108 (2012) 172002 1201.1872
16 K.-T. Chao et al. $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ polarization at hadron colliders in nonrelativistic QCD PRL 108 (2012) 242004 1201.2675
17 B. Gong, L.-P. Wan, J.-X. Wang, and H.-F. Zhang Polarization for prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ production at the Tevatron and LHC PRL 110 (2013) 042002 1205.6682
18 M. Butenschön and B. A. Kniehl Next-to-leading-order tests of NRQCD factorization with $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ yield and polarization Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 (2013) 1350027 1212.2037
19 P. Faccioli et al. Quarkonium production in the LHC era: A polarized perspective PLB 736 (2014) 98 1403.3970
20 G. T. Bodwin et al. Fragmentation contributions to hadroproduction of prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $, $ \chi_{{\mathrm{c}}J} $, and $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ states PRD 93 (2016) 034041 1509.07904
21 P. Faccioli et al. From identical S- and P-wave $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ spectra to maximally distinct polarizations: probing NRQCD with $ \chi $ states EPJC 78 (2018) 268 1802.01106
22 V. Cheung and R. Vogt Production and polarization of direct $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ to $ O(\alpha_s^3) $ in the improved color evaporation model in collinear factorization PRD 104 (2021) 094026 2102.09118
23 PHENIX Collaboration Transverse momentum dependence of $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ polarization at midrapidity in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 200 GeV PRD 82 (2010) 012001 0912.2082
24 STAR Collaboration Measurement of inclusive $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ polarization in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 200 GeV by the STAR experiment PRD 102 (2020) 092009 2007.04732
25 ALICE Collaboration $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ polarization in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRL 108 (2012) 082001 1111.1630
26 CMS Collaboration Constraints on the $ \chi_{{\mathrm{c}}1} $ versus $ \chi_{{\mathrm{c}}2} $ polarizations in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRL 124 (2020) 162002 CMS-BPH-13-001
1912.07706
27 P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, and T. Madlener From prompt to direct $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ production: new insights on the $ \chi_{{\mathrm{c}}1} $ and $ \chi_{{\mathrm{c}}2} $ polarizations and feed-down contributions from a global-fit analysis of mid-rapidity LHC data EPJC 80 (2020) 623 2006.15446
28 P. Faccioli and C. Lourenço NRQCD colour-octet expansion vs.\ LHC quarkonium production: signs of a hierarchy puzzle? EPJC 79 (2019) 457 1905.09553
29 P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, J. Seixas, and H. K. Wöhri Study of $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ and $ \chi_{{\mathrm{c}}} $ decays as feed-down sources of $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ hadro-production JHEP 10 (2008) 004 0809.2153
30 P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, and J. Seixas Rotation-invariant relations in vector meson decays into fermion pairs PRL 105 (2010) 061601 1005.2601
31 P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, and J. Seixas New approach to quarkonium polarization studies PRD 81 (2010) 111502 1005.2855
32 P. Faccioli and C. Lourenço Particle polarization in high energy physics: an introduction and case studies on vector particle production at the LHC Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, 2022
link
33 CMS Collaboration Angular coefficients of Z bosons produced in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV and decaying to $ \mu^+ \mu^- $ as a function of transverse momentum and rapidity PLB 750 (2015) 154 CMS-SMP-13-010
1504.03512
34 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the angular coefficients in Z-boson events using electron and muon pairs from data taken at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 08 (2016) 159 1606.00689
35 E. Braaten, D. Kang, J. Lee, and C. Yu Optimal spin quantization axes for the polarization of dileptons with large transverse momentum PRD 79 (2009) 014025 0810.4506
36 J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper Angular distribution of dileptons in high-energy hadron collisions PRD 16 (1977) 2219
37 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
38 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
39 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
40 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
41 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
42 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
43 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
44 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
45 CMS Collaboration Prompt and non-prompt $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV EPJC 71 (2011) 1575 CMS-BPH-10-002
1011.4193
46 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
47 N. Davidson, T. Przedzinski, and Z. Was PHOTOS interface in C++: technical and physics documentation Comput. Phys. Commun. 199 (2016) 86 1011.0937
48 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
49 M. J. Oreglia A study of the reactions $ \psi^\prime \to \gamma \gamma \psi $ PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1980
link
50 CMS Collaboration $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 02 (2012) 011 CMS-BPH-10-014
1111.1557
51 CMS Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ prompt double-differential cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRL 114 (2015) 191802 CMS-BPH-14-001
1502.04155
52 V. Knünz, Measurement of quarkonium polarization to probe QCD at the LHC PhD thesis, Vienna, Tech. U., Atominst, 2015
link
53 P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, J. Seixas, and H. Wöhri Towards the experimental clarification of quarkonium polarization EPJC 69 (2010) 657 1006.2738
54 P. Faccioli and C. Lourenço On the polarization of the non-prompt contribution to inclusive $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ production in pp collisions JHEP 10 (2022) 005 2206.14686
55 V. Krey and K. R. S. Balaji Polarized $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ production from $ {\mathrm{B}} $ mesons at the Fermilab Tevatron PRD 67 (2003) 054011 hep-ph/0209135
56 CDF Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ and $ \psi\mathrm{(2S)} $ polarization in $ \mathrm{p}\overline{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.8 TeV PRL 85 (2000) 2886 hep-ex/0004027
57 CLEO Collaboration Inclusive decays of $ {\mathrm{B}} $ mesons to charmonium PRD 52 (1995) 2661
58 BaBar Collaboration Study of inclusive production of charmonium mesons in $ {\mathrm{B}} $ decay PRD 67 (2003) 032002 hep-ex/0207097
59 M. Beneke, F. Maltoni, and I. Z. Rothstein QCD analysis of inclusive $ {\mathrm{B}} $ decay into charmonium PRD 59 (1999) 054003 hep-ph/9808360
60 M. Beneke, G. A. Schuler, and S. Wolf Quarkonium momentum distributions in photoproduction and $ {\mathrm{B}} $ decay PRD 62 (2000) 034004 hep-ph/0001062
61 S. Fleming, O. F. Hernandez, I. Maksymyk, and H. Nadeau NRQCD matrix elements in polarization of $ \mathrm{J}/\psi $ produced from b decay PRD 55 (1997) 4098 hep-ph/9608413
62 H.-S. Shao, Y.-Q. Ma, K. Wang, and K.-T. Chao Polarizations of $ \chi_{{\mathrm{c}}1} $ and $ \chi_{{\mathrm{c}}2} $ in prompt production at the LHC PRL 112 (2014) 182003 1402.2913
63 H.-S. Shao HELAC-Onia 2.0: an upgraded matrix-element and event generator for heavy quarkonium physics Comput. Phys. Commun. 198 (2016) 238 1507.03435
64 CMS Collaboration HEPData record for this analysis link
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN