CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-TOP-26-001
Measurement of the $ \vert V_{\mathrm{cb}}\vert $ element of the CKM matrix from top quark pair events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A measurement of the magnitude of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element $ \vert V_{\mathrm{cb}}\vert $ is presented using top quark pair events produced in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC. The measurement targets the lepton+jets final state, where one W boson decays leptonically and the other hadronically. The value of $ \vert V_{\mathrm{cb}}\vert $ is extracted from the branching fraction of the $ \mathrm{W}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{cb} $ decay. To identify this rare signal amid the dominant $ \mathrm{W}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{ud} $ and $ \mathrm{W}{\rightarrow}\mathrm{cs} $ backgrounds, a multivariate discriminator based primarily on the b jet tagging information of the jets assigned to the hadronic W boson decay is used. The measured value is $ \vert V_{\mathrm{cb}}\vert=4.59 ^{+0.44}_{-0.48} $ (stat) $ ^{+0.64}_{-0.76} $ (syst) $ \times10^{-2} $. This result represents the most precise measurement of $ \vert V_{\mathrm{cb}}\vert $ from on-shell W boson decays at a hadron collider, providing a complementary determination at the electroweak scale that is independent of the nonperturbative QCD inputs used in measurements based on semileptonic B-hadron decays.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Distributions of the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{reco}} $ evaluated on simulated lepton+jets $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ events, categorized by the hadronic W boson decay mode: $ \mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d} (\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}) $ (left), $ \mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{s} (\mathrm{c}\mathrm{d}) $ (center), and the signal $ \mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b} $ (right). The stacked histograms represent the categorization of the selected jet-parton assignments based on generator-level truth information, as defined in the text.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Feature importance for the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminant as determined by the TabNet model during training.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluating the binary classification performance of the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminant. The curves demonstrate the separation power of the correctly matched $ \mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b} $ signal against various topologies, which are explicitly categorized by the hadronic W boson decay mode and the additional heavy-flavor jet content. The definitions of the signal and background classes, including the matching requirement, are given in Table 2.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Distributions of the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminator for simulated events, categorized by the hadronic W boson decay mode: $ \mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{d} (\mathrm{u}\mathrm{s}) $ (left), $ \mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{s} (\mathrm{c}\mathrm{d}) $ (center), and $ \mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b} $ (right). The stacked histograms represent the categorization of the jet-parton assignments, following the identical definitions established in figure 1.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Pre-fit distributions in the single-lepton region of the $ B $ scores of the $ j_{D}^{W} $ (upper left) and $ j_{U}^{W} $ (upper right) candidates, the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{reco}} $ discriminator (middle left), the reconstructed hadronic top quark mass (middle right), the $ \min m_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}} $ observable (lower left), and the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminator (lower right). The signal contribution is overlaid and is not included in the stacked background prediction. For visual clarity, $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\text{HF} $ contributions are included in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ categories labeled by the hadronic W boson decay mode and in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ dilepton category. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic components before the likelihood fit.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Pre-fit distributions in the single-lepton region of the $ B $ scores of the $ j_{D}^{W} $ (upper left) and $ j_{U}^{W} $ (upper right) candidates, the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{reco}} $ discriminator (middle left), the reconstructed hadronic top quark mass (middle right), the $ \min m_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}} $ observable (lower left), and the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminator (lower right). The signal contribution is overlaid and is not included in the stacked background prediction. For visual clarity, $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\text{HF} $ contributions are included in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ categories labeled by the hadronic W boson decay mode and in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ dilepton category. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic components before the likelihood fit.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Pre-fit distributions in the single-lepton region of the $ B $ scores of the $ j_{D}^{W} $ (upper left) and $ j_{U}^{W} $ (upper right) candidates, the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{reco}} $ discriminator (middle left), the reconstructed hadronic top quark mass (middle right), the $ \min m_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}} $ observable (lower left), and the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminator (lower right). The signal contribution is overlaid and is not included in the stacked background prediction. For visual clarity, $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\text{HF} $ contributions are included in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ categories labeled by the hadronic W boson decay mode and in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ dilepton category. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic components before the likelihood fit.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Pre-fit distributions in the single-lepton region of the $ B $ scores of the $ j_{D}^{W} $ (upper left) and $ j_{U}^{W} $ (upper right) candidates, the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{reco}} $ discriminator (middle left), the reconstructed hadronic top quark mass (middle right), the $ \min m_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}} $ observable (lower left), and the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminator (lower right). The signal contribution is overlaid and is not included in the stacked background prediction. For visual clarity, $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\text{HF} $ contributions are included in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ categories labeled by the hadronic W boson decay mode and in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ dilepton category. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic components before the likelihood fit.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Pre-fit distributions in the single-lepton region of the $ B $ scores of the $ j_{D}^{W} $ (upper left) and $ j_{U}^{W} $ (upper right) candidates, the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{reco}} $ discriminator (middle left), the reconstructed hadronic top quark mass (middle right), the $ \min m_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}} $ observable (lower left), and the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminator (lower right). The signal contribution is overlaid and is not included in the stacked background prediction. For visual clarity, $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\text{HF} $ contributions are included in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ categories labeled by the hadronic W boson decay mode and in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ dilepton category. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic components before the likelihood fit.

png pdf
Figure 5-e:
Pre-fit distributions in the single-lepton region of the $ B $ scores of the $ j_{D}^{W} $ (upper left) and $ j_{U}^{W} $ (upper right) candidates, the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{reco}} $ discriminator (middle left), the reconstructed hadronic top quark mass (middle right), the $ \min m_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}} $ observable (lower left), and the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminator (lower right). The signal contribution is overlaid and is not included in the stacked background prediction. For visual clarity, $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\text{HF} $ contributions are included in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ categories labeled by the hadronic W boson decay mode and in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ dilepton category. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic components before the likelihood fit.

png pdf
Figure 5-f:
Pre-fit distributions in the single-lepton region of the $ B $ scores of the $ j_{D}^{W} $ (upper left) and $ j_{U}^{W} $ (upper right) candidates, the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{reco}} $ discriminator (middle left), the reconstructed hadronic top quark mass (middle right), the $ \min m_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b}} $ observable (lower left), and the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminator (lower right). The signal contribution is overlaid and is not included in the stacked background prediction. For visual clarity, $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\text{HF} $ contributions are included in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ categories labeled by the hadronic W boson decay mode and in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ dilepton category. The uncertainty bands include statistical and systematic components before the likelihood fit.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Pre-fit distribution of the unrolled 2D $ B $ template in the dilepton control region. The $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ contributions are grouped by the flavor content of additional jets; the detailed generator-level categories are defined in section 3. The uncertainty band includes statistical and systematic components before the likelihood fit.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Post-fit distributions of the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminator in the single-lepton region. For visual clarity, $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\text{HF} $ contributions are included in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ categories labeled by the hadronic W boson decay mode and in the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ dilepton category. The uncertainty bands include both statistical and systematic components.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Post-fit distributions of the unrolled 2D $ B $ template in the dilepton control region. The $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ contributions are grouped by the flavor content of additional jets; the detailed generator-level categories are defined in section 3. The uncertainty bands include both statistical and systematic components.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Profile likelihood scan as a function of $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $. The horizontal lines at $ -2\Delta ln \mathcal{L} = 1 $ and 4 indicate the 68% and 95% confidence intervals, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Bootstrap compatibility test of the POI values obtained with the 4FS and 5FS fits. The left panel shows the paired $ ( r_\mathrm{4FS} , r_\mathrm{5FS} ) $ distribution, and the right panel shows the distribution of $ Delta r = r_\mathrm{4FS} - r_\mathrm{5FS} $.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of event selection.

png pdf
Table 2:
Definition of the seven training classes for the $ \mathcal{D}_{\mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}} $ discriminant. The events are categorized into seven distinct classes based on the decay mode of the hadronic W boson, the presence and flavor of additional heavy-flavor jets, and the success of the jet-parton matching during the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ reconstruction. Classes 1 and 2 constitute the targeted signal process, while Classes 3 through 7 represent the various background topologies. The additional b-flavored jet class comprises the $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\mathrm{b} $, $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}2\mathrm{b} $, and $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{b} $ generator-level categories, whereas the additional c-flavored jet class comprises the $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\mathrm{c} $ and $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} {+}\mathrm{c}\overline{\mathrm{c}} $ generator-level categories.

png pdf
Table 3:
Leading contributions to the uncertainty in the fitted signal strength $(r)$. Each contribution is evaluated from profile-likelihood scans by fixing the corresponding group of nuisance parameters. Because correlations between different nuisance-parameter groups cannot be uniquely assigned in this procedure, the individual contributions are not expected to add in quadrature to the total uncertainty.
Summary
A measurement of the magnitude of the Cabibbo--Kobayashi--Maskawa (CKM) matrix element $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ is presented using top-quark pair ( $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $) events in the lepton+jets final state produced in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ collected by the CMS experiment. The analysis exploits the hadronic decay of the W boson in $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ events to determine $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ at the electroweak scale, without relying on the nonperturbative QCD inputs required in semileptonic b-flavored hadron decay measurements. The $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ system is reconstructed using a boosted decision tree algorithm, and a dedicated discriminator is constructed to separate the $ \mathrm{W}{\to}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b} $ signal from the dominant $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ backgrounds using flavor-tagging and kinematic information. A simultaneous binned maximum-likelihood fit is applied to the signal region and control regions to extract the signal strength. Backgrounds from $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with additional heavy-flavor jets are constrained in the fit, with the nominal modeling of the additional-b component based on a dedicated NLO $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ prediction (4FS). An alternative fit using the inclusive $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ prediction at NLO in QCD (5FS) is found to be compatible with the nominal result within the sensitivity of the analysis. The measured signal strength is $ r = 1.20^{+0.44}_{-0.42} $, corresponding to \[ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| = 4.59^{+0.44}_{-0.48} (\mathrm{stat}) ^{+0.64}_{-0.76} (\mathrm{syst}) \times 10^-2. \] The uncertainties include both statistical and systematic contributions and are dominated by the modeling of $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with additional heavy-flavor jets and by flavor-tagging uncertainties. The measured value is consistent within uncertainties with both the inclusive and exclusive determinations from semileptonic $ {\mathrm{B}} $ meson decays [9]. Although its precision is currently lower than that of those determinations, it provides a theoretically complementary probe of $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ through the decay of an on-shell W boson at the electroweak scale. This result represents the most sensitive hadron-collider constraint to date on $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ from W boson decays. Future measurements will benefit from the increased luminosity and the enhanced heavy-flavor tagging performance expected in CMS Run 3. Furthermore, extending the phase space to include the boosted regime offers a promising complementary avenue, where specialized boosted-jet tagging techniques can help suppress backgrounds and reduce systematic uncertainties [62]. The synergy between the resolved-channel strategy established in this work and future boosted-regime analyses holds the potential to reach the precision required to shed light on the long-standing discrepancy between inclusive and exclusive determinations of $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $.
References
1 M. Bordone, B. Capdevila, and P. Gambino Three loop calculations and inclusive $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ PLB 822 (2021) 136679 2107.00604
2 F. Bernlochner et al. First extraction of inclusive $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ from $ q^2 $ moments JHEP 10 (2022) 068 2205.10274
3 BaBar Collaboration Extraction of form factors from a four-dimensional angular analysis of $ {\overline{\mathrm{B}}\to\mathrm{D}^{*}\ell^-\overline{\nu}_{\ell}} $ PRL 123 (2019) 091801 1903.10002
4 Belle-II Collaboration Determination of $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ using $ {\overline{\mathrm{B}}^{0}\to\mathrm{D}^{*+}\ell^-\overline{\nu}_{\ell}} $ decays with \mboxBelle II PRD 108 (2023) 092013 2310.01170
5 Belle Collaboration Measurement of angular coefficients of $ {\overline{\mathrm{B}}\to\mathrm{D}^{*}\ell\overline{\nu}_{\ell}} $: Implications for $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ and tests of lepton flavor universality PRL 133 (2024) 131801 2310.20286
6 BaBar Collaboration Measurement of $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ and the form-factor slope in $ {\overline{\mathrm{B}}\to\mathrm{D}\ell^-\overline{\nu}_{\ell}} $ decays in events tagged by a fully reconstructed $ {\mathrm{B}} $ meson PRL 104 (2010) 011802 0904.4063
7 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the decay $ {{\mathrm{B}}\to\mathrm{D}\ell\nu_{\ell}} $ in fully reconstructed events and determination of the Cabibbo--Kobayashi--Maskawa matrix element $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ PRD 93 (2016) 032006 1510.03657
8 Belle-II Collaboration Determination of $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ from $ {{\mathrm{B}}\to\mathrm{D}\ell\nu} $ decays using 2019--2021 \mboxBelle II data 2210.13143
9 Particle Data Group , S. Navas et al. Review of particle physics PRD 110 (2024) 030001
10 P. F. Harrison and V. E. Vladimirov A method to determine $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ at the weak scale in top decays at the LHC JHEP 01 (2019) 191 1810.09424
11 S. Choi and B. Kim Measurement of the CKM matrix element $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ from top quark pair events at the LHC J. Korean Phys. Soc. 78 (2021) 1023
12 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ element of the CKM matrix in $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ decays with the ATLAS detector JHEP 07 (2026) 078 2603.16414
13 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
14 CMS Collaboration Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC \mboxRun 3 JINST 19 (2024) P05064 CMS-PRF-21-001
2309.05466
15 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
16 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
17 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC \mboxRun 2 JINST 19 (2024) P11021 CMS-TRG-19-001
2410.17038
18 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
19 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
20 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
21 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
22 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
23 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FASTJET user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
24 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
25 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
26 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
27 E. Bols et al. Jet flavour classification using DeepJet JINST 15 (2020) P12012 2008.10519
28 CMS Collaboration Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with the CMS detector CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2023-005, 2023
CDS
29 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
30 D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran Pileup per particle identification JHEP 10 (2014) 059 1407.6013
31 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
32 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
33 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG box JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
34 S. Frixione, G. Ridolfi, and P. Nason A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
35 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
36 NNPDF Collaboration Unbiased global determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties at NNLO and at LO NPB 855 (2012) 153 1107.2652
37 M. Czakon and A. Mitov top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
38 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to pythia 8.2 Computer Physics Communications 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
39 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA 8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
40 T. Je \v z o and P. Nason On the treatment of resonances in next-to-leading order calculations matched to a parton shower JHEP 12 (2015) 065 1509.09071
41 T. Je \v z o, J. M. Lindert, N. Moretti, and S. Pozzorini New NLOPS predictions for $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ +b-jet production at the LHC EPJC 78 (2018) 502 1802.00426
42 F. Buccioni et al. OpenLoops 2 EPJC 79 (2019) 866 1907.13071
43 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The catchment area of jets JHEP 04 (2008) 005 0802.1188
44 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
45 E. Re Single-top $ {\mathrm{W}\mathrm{t}} $-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
46 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
47 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
48 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
49 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
50 T. Chen and C. Guestrin XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system in 2nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: San Francisco CA, USA, August 13--17,, 2016
Proc. 2 (2016) 2
1603.02754
51 CMS Collaboration A deep neural network for simultaneous estimation of b jet energy and resolution Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 4 (2020) 10 CMS-HIG-18-027
1912.06046
52 S. O. Arik and T. Pfister TabNet: Attentive interpretable tabular learning 1908.07442
53 J. Zhang and A. C. Sanderson JADE: Adaptive differential evolution with optional external archive IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13 (2009) 945
54 CMS Collaboration First measurement of the cross section for top quark pair production with additional charm jets using dileptonic final states in $ {\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 820 (2021) 136565 CMS-TOP-20-003
2012.09225
55 CMS Collaboration Reweighting simulated events using machine-learning techniques in the CMS experiment EPJC 85 (2025) 495 CMS-MLG-24-001
2411.03023
56 S. Argyropoulos and T. Sjostrand Effects of color reconnection on $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ final states at the LHC JHEP 11 (2014) 043 1407.6653
57 J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands String formation beyond leading colour JHEP 08 (2015) 003 1505.01681
58 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution measurement with \mboxRun 2 legacy data collected by CMS at 13 TeV CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2021-033, 2021
CDS
59 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
60 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with the CMS detector at the Large Hadron Collider Submitted to Phys. Rev. X, 2026 CMS-LUM-20-001
2606.26832
61 CMS Collaboration The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: combine Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 8 (2024) 19 CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
62 Y. Zhao et al. Novel $ |V_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{b}}| $ extraction method via boosted $ {\mathrm{b}\mathrm{c}} $-tagging with in-situ calibration 2503.00118
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN