CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-HIG-23-012
Search for highly energetic double Higgs boson production in the two bottom quark and two vector boson all-hadronic final state
Abstract: A search for standard model (SM) nonresonant Higgs boson pair ($ \mathrm{HH} $) production is performed in the two bottom quark ($ \mathrm{b\overline{b}} $) and all-hadronic two vector boson ($ \mathrm{VV}\to\mathrm{4q} $) final states. The search is carried out in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with a dataset corresponding to a total luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. The analysis focuses on highly Lorentz-boosted HH candidates, where each Higgs boson's daughter quarks are all merged inside a single large radius jet. A new global particle transformer (GloParT) classifier is used to effectively perform boosted $ \mathrm{VV}\to\mathrm{4q} $ jet identification. The multiplicative modifier of the SM quartic coupling between two Higgs bosons and two vector bosons is observed (expected) to be constrained at 95% confidence level to $ \kappa_\mathrm{2V} \in [-0.04, 2.05] $ ($ [0.05, 1.98] $).
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Leading-order diagrams for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production via gluon-gluon fusion (top) and vector boson fusion (bottom). In this note, we refer to the left-most VBF diagram as the $ ({\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}})^2 $ and the right-most as the $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}} $ diagram.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Leading-order diagrams for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production via gluon-gluon fusion (top) and vector boson fusion (bottom). In this note, we refer to the left-most VBF diagram as the $ ({\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}})^2 $ and the right-most as the $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}} $ diagram.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Leading-order diagrams for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production via gluon-gluon fusion (top) and vector boson fusion (bottom). In this note, we refer to the left-most VBF diagram as the $ ({\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}})^2 $ and the right-most as the $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}} $ diagram.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Leading-order diagrams for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production via gluon-gluon fusion (top) and vector boson fusion (bottom). In this note, we refer to the left-most VBF diagram as the $ ({\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}})^2 $ and the right-most as the $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}} $ diagram.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Leading-order diagrams for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production via gluon-gluon fusion (top) and vector boson fusion (bottom). In this note, we refer to the left-most VBF diagram as the $ ({\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}})^2 $ and the right-most as the $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}} $ diagram.

png pdf
Figure 1-e:
Leading-order diagrams for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production via gluon-gluon fusion (top) and vector boson fusion (bottom). In this note, we refer to the left-most VBF diagram as the $ ({\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}})^2 $ and the right-most as the $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}} $ diagram.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Differential cross section at 13 TeV center of mass for VBF $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}} $ production as a function of the invariant mass of the $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}} $ system ($ m_{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}} $) for different diagrams and couplings.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Illustration of the signal and fail analysis region selections in terms of the $ T_\text{Xbb}^\mathrm{bb} $ and BDT scores.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Full set of training jet classes for GloParT.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the $ T_\text{HVV} $ discriminator on VV-candidate jets passing the AK8 online and offline selections for SM $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}} $ signal versus QCD and $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ backgrounds.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Distributions of the GloParT $ T_\text{HVV} $ discriminant before (left) and after (right) the Lund plane reweighting of top matched jets. The combined uncertainties from Lund-plane-based scale factors on the MC yield per bin are shown in gray, and are propagated to the data/MC ratio intervals.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Distributions of the GloParT $ T_\text{HVV} $ discriminant before (left) and after (right) the Lund plane reweighting of top matched jets. The combined uncertainties from Lund-plane-based scale factors on the MC yield per bin are shown in gray, and are propagated to the data/MC ratio intervals.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Distributions of the GloParT $ T_\text{HVV} $ discriminant before (left) and after (right) the Lund plane reweighting of top matched jets. The combined uncertainties from Lund-plane-based scale factors on the MC yield per bin are shown in gray, and are propagated to the data/MC ratio intervals.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Post-background-only-fit distributions of the $ \mathrm{b} \overline{\mathrm{b}} $-candidate jet regressed mass ($ {m_\mathrm{reg}^\mathrm{bb}} $) in the ggF (left) and VBF (right) signal regions.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Post-background-only-fit distributions of the $ \mathrm{b} \overline{\mathrm{b}} $-candidate jet regressed mass ($ {m_\mathrm{reg}^\mathrm{bb}} $) in the ggF (left) and VBF (right) signal regions.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Post-background-only-fit distributions of the $ \mathrm{b} \overline{\mathrm{b}} $-candidate jet regressed mass ($ {m_\mathrm{reg}^\mathrm{bb}} $) in the ggF (left) and VBF (right) signal regions.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Observed and expected exclusion limits at 95% CL for the $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V}} $ signal SM production cross section (top) and cross section at $ \kappa_{2\mathrm{V}}= $ 0 (bottom).

png pdf
Figure 9:
1D upper limits scans on the inclusive $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}} $ production cross section as a function of $ \kappa_{2\mathrm{V}} $ for $ \kappa_{\mathrm{t}} = \kappa_{\lambda} = \kappa_{\mathrm{V}} = $ 1.
Tables

png pdf
Table 2:
The complete set of input features into GloParT. Three types of inputs are considered: charged PF candidates, neutral PF candidates, and secondary vertices (SVs).

png pdf
Table 3:
Signal efficiency scale factors (SFs) and uncertainties for the BDT selection using the Lund jet plane for different $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}} $ signals and analysis regions. Both the total combined uncertainty and the components mentioned in the text are shown.

png pdf
Table 4:
Summary of the effect of different systematic uncertainties on the signal or background yields.
Summary
We describe a search for standard model (SM) nonresonant Higgs boson pair ($ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}} $) production in the two bottom quark ($ \mathrm{b} \overline{\mathrm{b}} $) and two vector boson (VV) all-hadronic final states. We search for two highly boosted Higgs bosons producing fully merged jets; where all H daughter quarks are contained within a single large-radius jet. The established ParticleNet mass-decorrelated tagger is used to select for $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ jets and we introduce the new high-performing GloParT tagger for $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{V}\mathrm{V} $ jets. The $ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}} $ signal is extracted using the $ \mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ jet regressed mass using control regions with tagger scores inverted to obtain a data-driven estimate of the shape and normalization of the QCD multijet background via a parametric transfer function. The results are interpreted in terms of a multiplicative modifier of the SM quartic coupling between two Higgs bosons and two vector bosons, which is observed (expected) to be constrained to $ [-0.04, 2.05] $ ($ [0.05, 1.98] $) at 95% confidence level.
References
1 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in $ pp $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments PRL 114 (2015) 191803 1503.07589
2 CMS Collaboration A measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the diphoton decay channel PLB 805 (2020) 135425 CMS-HIG-19-004
2002.06398
3 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the $ H \to ZZ^* \to 4 \ell $ decay channel using 139 fb$ ^{-1} $ of $ \sqrt s $ = 13 TeV $ pp $ collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 843 (2023) 137880 2207.00320
4 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson width and evidence of its off-shell contributions to ZZ production Nature Phys. 18 (2022) 1329 CMS-HIG-21-013
2202.06923
5 ATLAS Collaboration Evidence of off-shell Higgs boson production from ZZ leptonic decay channels and constraints on its total width with the ATLAS detector PLB 846 (2023) 138223 2304.01532
6 CMS Collaboration Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV EPJC 79 (2019) 421 CMS-HIG-17-031
1809.10733
7 CMS Collaboration A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery Nature 607 (2022) 60 CMS-HIG-22-001
2207.00043
8 ATLAS Collaboration A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery Nature 607 (2022) 52 2207.00092
9 M. Grazzini et al. Higgs boson pair production at NNLO with top quark mass effects JHEP 05 (2018) 059 1803.02463
10 J. Baglio et al. $ gg\to HH $: Combined uncertainties PRD 103 (2021) 056002 2008.11626
11 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2 (2017) 1610.07922
12 F. Bishara, R. Contino, and J. Rojo Higgs pair production in vector-boson fusion at the LHC and beyond EPJC 77 (2017) 481 1611.03860
13 CMS Collaboration Search for nonresonant pair production of highly energetic Higgs bosons decaying to bottom quarks PRL 131 (2023) 041803 2205.06667
14 CMS Collaboration Search for Higgs Boson Pair Production in the four b quark final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 129 (2022) 081802 CMS-HIG-20-005
2202.09617
15 CMS Collaboration Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in final state with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV PLB 842 (2023) 137531 CMS-HIG-20-010
2206.09401
16 ATLAS Collaboration Search for pair production of boosted Higgs bosons via vector-boson fusion in the $ \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ final state using pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector Submitted to Phys. Lett. B., 2024 2404.17193
17 CMS Collaboration Performance of heavy-flavour jet identification in boosted topologies in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2023
CMS-PAS-BTV-22-001
CMS-PAS-BTV-22-001
18 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
19 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
20 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
21 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
22 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
23 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
24 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
25 CMS Collaboration Pileup Removal Algorithms CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2014 CMS-PAS-JME-14-001
26 D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran Pileup Per Particle Identification JHEP 10 (2014) 059 1407.6013
27 CMS Collaboration Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data JINST 15 (2020) P09018 CMS-JME-18-001
2003.00503
28 CMS Collaboration Performance of Electron Reconstruction and Selection with the CMS Detector in Proton-Proton Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
29 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
30 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
31 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
32 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
33 E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and A. Vicini Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM JHEP 02 (2012) 088 1111.2854
34 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
35 S. Dawson, S. Dittmaier, and M. Spira Neutral Higgs boson pair production at hadron colliders: QCD corrections PRD 58 (1998) 115012 hep-ph/9805244
36 D. de Florian and J. Mazzitelli Higgs Boson Pair Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD PRL 111 (2013) 201801 1309.6594
37 D. de Florian and J. Mazzitelli Higgs pair production at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy at the LHC JHEP 09 (2015) 053 1505.07122
38 J. Baglio et al. Gluon fusion into Higgs pairs at NLO QCD and the top mass scheme EPJC 79 (2019) 459 1811.05692
39 S. Borowka et al. Higgs Boson Pair Production in Gluon Fusion at Next-to-Leading Order with Full Top-Quark Mass Dependence PRL 117 (2016) 012001 1604.06447
40 D. Y. Shao, C. S. Li, H. T. Li, and J. Wang Threshold resummation effects in Higgs boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2013) 169 1301.1245
41 T. Ježo et al. An NLO+PS generator for $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} $ and $ \mathrm{W}\mathrm{t} $ production and decay including non-resonant and interference effects EPJC 76 (2016) 691 1607.04538
42 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A Positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
43 K. Hamilton, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and G. Zanderighi Merging H/W/Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with no merging scale: a path to parton shower + NNLO matching JHEP 05 (2013) 082 1212.4504
44 P. Nason and C. Oleari NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 02 (2010) 037 0911.5299
45 G. Luisoni, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and F. Tramontano $ \mathrm{H}\mathrm{W}^{\pm} $/$\mathrm{HZ}$+0 and 1 jet at NLO with the POWHEG box interfaced to GoSam and their merging within MINLO JHEP 10 (2013) 083 1306.2542
46 H. B. Hartanto, B. Jäger, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX PRD 91 (2015) 094003 1501.04498
47 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
48 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
49 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
50 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
51 D. Krohn, J. Thaler, and L.-T. Wang Jet Trimming JHEP 02 (2010) 084 0912.1342
52 H. Qu and L. Gouskos ParticleNet: Jet Tagging via Particle Clouds PRD 101 (2020) 056019 1902.08570
53 H. Qu, C. Li, and S. Qian Particle Transformer for Jet Tagging in Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, K. Chaudhuri et al., eds., volume 162, 2022
link
2202.03772
54 CMS Collaboration Mass regression of highly-boosted jets using graph neural networks CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2021-017, 2021
CDS
55 F. A. Dreyer, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The Lund Jet Plane JHEP 12 (2018) 064 1807.04758
56 CMS Collaboration Lund Plane Reweighting for Jet Substructure Correction CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2023-046, 2023
CDS
57 S. Catani, Y. L. Dokshitzer, M. H. Seymour, and B. R. Webber Longitudinally invariant $ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ clustering algorithms for hadron hadron collisions NPB 406 (1993) 187
58 S. D. Ellis and D. E. Soper Successive combination jet algorithm for hadron collisions PRD 48 (1993) 3160 hep-ph/9305266
59 CMS Collaboration Search for a massive resonance decaying to a pair of Higgs bosons in the four b quark final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV PLB 781 (2018) 244 1710.04960
60 CMS Collaboration Inclusive search for highly boosted Higgs bosons decaying to bottom quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 12 (2020) 85 CMS-HIG-19-003
2006.13251
61 R. A. Fisher On the interpretation of $ \chi^2 $ from contingency tables, and the calculation of p J. Royal Statistical Society 85 (1922) 87
62 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution measurement with Run 2 Legacy Data Collected by CMS at 13 TeV CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2021-033, 2021
CDS
63 CMS Collaboration Search for Higgs boson pair production via vector boson fusion with highly Lorentz-boosted Higgs bosons in the four b quark final state at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-B2G-21-001, CERN, 2021
CDS
64 S. Mrenna and P. Skands Automated Parton-Shower Variations in Pythia 8 PRD 94 (2016) 074005 1605.08352
65 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
66 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
67 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
68 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and the LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-011, CMS NOTE-2011/005, 2011
link
69 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
70 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ \text{CL}_\text{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
71 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
72 CMS Collaboration The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: \textscCombine Accepted by Comput. Softw. Big Sci, 2024 CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
73 W. Verkerke and D. P. Kirkby The RooFit toolkit for data modeling eConf C0303241 MOLT007, 2003 physics/0306116
74 L. Moneta et al. The RooStats Project PoS ACAT 057, 2010
link
1009.1003
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN