CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-TOP-22-002
Search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark and Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark (t) and Higgs boson (H) is presented. The search is based on Run 2 proton-proton collisions collected in 2016--2018 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC and corresponding to 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. Events containing a pair of leptons with the same-sign electric charge and at least one jet are considered. Two boosted decision trees are trained to distinguish the signal from the standard model background. No significant excess above the estimated background is observed. The results are used to constrain the branching ratio ($ \mathcal{B} $) of the top quark decaying to a Higgs boson and an up (u) or charm quark (c). The observed (expected) 95% confidence level upper limits are found to be 0.072% (0.059%) for $ \mathcal{B}\left(\mathrm{t\to Hu}\right) $ and 0.043% (0.062%) for $ \mathcal{B}\left(\mathrm{t\to Hc}\right) $. A combination of searches for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of top quarks and Higgs bosons in final states with a pair of photons or a pair of bottom quarks, with data collected by the CMS experiment, is performed. The resulting observed (expected) 95% confidence level upper limits are 0.019% (0.027%) for $ \mathcal{B}\left(\mathrm{t\to Hu}\right) $ and 0.037% (0.035%) for $ \mathcal{B}\left(\mathrm{t\to Hc}\right) $. This result constitutes the best exclusion limits to date.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Representative Feynman diagrams for the production modes considered: FCNC-associated production of a single top quark with a Higgs boson (ST, left), and $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with the FCNC decay of the top quark to a Higgs boson and an up or charm quark (TT, right).

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Representative Feynman diagrams for the production modes considered: FCNC-associated production of a single top quark with a Higgs boson (ST, left), and $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with the FCNC decay of the top quark to a Higgs boson and an up or charm quark (TT, right).

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Representative Feynman diagrams for the production modes considered: FCNC-associated production of a single top quark with a Higgs boson (ST, left), and $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production with the FCNC decay of the top quark to a Higgs boson and an up or charm quark (TT, right).

png pdf
Figure 2:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the signal region for Run 2 are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include the statistical and systematic uncertainties of the analysis.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the signal region for Run 2 are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include the statistical and systematic uncertainties of the analysis.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the signal region for Run 2 are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include the statistical and systematic uncertainties of the analysis.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the signal region for Run 2 are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include the statistical and systematic uncertainties of the analysis.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
The prefit (upper) and postfit (lower) observed and expected distributions of BDT score in the signal region for Run 2 are shown. The $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ signal is shown on the left and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ is shown on the right. The uncertainty bands include the statistical and systematic uncertainties of the analysis.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The expected and observed limits on the anomalous coupling strength (left) and on the anomalous branching fraction (right) for Run 2 are shown.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The expected and observed limits on the anomalous coupling strength (left) and on the anomalous branching fraction (right) for Run 2 are shown.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The expected and observed limits on the anomalous coupling strength (left) and on the anomalous branching fraction (right) for Run 2 are shown.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Summary plot which shows the observed and expected results from three individual analyses and their combination. The dotted line shows the expected limit and the solid, red line shows the observed limit in all cases. The green and yellow bands show the 1 and 2 sigma ranges on the expected limits.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the trigger thresholds used to select the analysis data set. The triggers require two isolated leptons, with different $ p_{\mathrm{T}} $ requirements based on the flavors of each. In the case of opposite flavor triggers, the flavor of the leading lepton is listed first.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the analysis preselection requirements.

png pdf
Table 3:
Sources of systematic uncertainties in the yields of signal and background processes, as well as their impact on the yields in the signal regions. The impact is expressed as a one sigma range.

png pdf
Table 4:
Observed (expected) upper limits on the $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ branching fractions for the three searches in different Higgs boson decay channels performed by the CMS Collaboration. A statistical combination of the these results is also reported.
Summary
This note presents the results of a search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark, Higgs boson, and an up or charm quark. The search is performed in a final state with a pair of leptons of same-sign electric charge and at least one jet. Expected yields from backgrounds emerging from detector effects are estimated by extrapolating yields observed in control regions using transfer factors measured in orthogonal data samples. Expected yields from standard model processes producing a pair of prompt leptons with the same-sign electric charge are estimated from simulation. Two trained boosted decision trees are used to evaluate and classify each event. No excess above the estimated background from standard model processes is observed. The observed (expected) 95% confidence level upper limits on the branching ratio are found to be 0.072% (0.059%) for $ \mathcal{B}\left(\mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u}\right) $ and 0.043% (0.062%) for $ \mathcal{B}\left(\mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c}\right) $. These limits can be cast as constraints on the anomalous coupling strengths $ \kappa_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{H}} < $ 0.071 (0.064) and $ \kappa_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{H}} < $ 0.055 (0.065). A statistical combination of the results of this search with those of previous CMS publications searching for similar phenomena where the Higgs boson decays to a bottom quark-antiquark pair or to a pair of photons is performed. The results of this combination constrain $ \mathcal{B}\left(\mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u}\right) < $ 0.019% (0.027%) and $ \mathcal{B}\left(\mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c}\right) < $ 0.037% (0.035%) and represent the most stringent constraints on these interactions to date.
References
0 S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry PRD 2 (1970) 1285
2 M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 652
3 G. Eilam, J. L. Hewett, and A. Soni Rare decays of the top quark in the standard and two Higgs doublet models PRD 44 (1991) 1473
4 B. Mele, S. Petrarca, and A. Soddu A new evaluation of the decay width in the standard model PLB 435 (1998) 401
5 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra Top flavor-changing neutral interactions: theoretical expectations and experimental detection Acta Phys. Polon. B 35 (2004) 2695 hep-ph/0409342
6 C. Zhang and F. Maltoni Top-quark decay into Higgs boson and a light quark at next-to-leading order in QCD PRD 88 (2013) 054005 1305.7386
7 A. Azatov, M. Toharia, and L. Zhu Higgs mediated flavor changing neutral currents in warped extra dimensions PRD 80 (2009) 035016 0906.1990
8 A. Azatov, G. Panico, G. Perez, and Y. Soreq On the flavor structure of natural composite Higgs models \& top flavor violation JHEP 12 (2014) 082 1408.4525
9 S. Bejar, J. Guasch, and J. Sol \à Loop induced flavor changing neutral decays of the top quark in a general two Higgs doublet model NPB 600 (2001) 21 hep-ph/0011091
10 J. Guasch and J. Sol \à FCNC top quark decays in the MSSM: a door to SUSY physics in high luminosity colliders? NPB 562 (1999) 3
11 J. J. Cao et al. Supersymmetry-induced flavor-changing neutral-current top-quark processes at the CERN Large Hadron Collider PRD 75 (2007) 075021 hep-ph/0702264
12 J. Cao et al. SUSY induced top quark FCNC decay $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{c}\mathrm{H} $ after Run I of LHC EPJC 74 (2014) 3058 1404.1241
13 G. Eilam et al. Top-quark rare decay $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{c}\mathrm{H} $ in R-parity-violating SUSY PLB 510 (2001) 227 hep-ph/0102037
14 J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra Effects of mixing with quark singlets PRD 67 (2003) 035003 hep-ph/0210112
15 W.-S. Hou Tree level $t \to ch$ or $h \to tc$ decays PLB 296 (1992) 179
16 I. Baum, G. Eilam, and S. Bar-Shalom Scalar flavor changing neutral currents and rare top quark decays in a two H iggs doublet model 'for the top quark' PRD 77 (2008) 113008 0802.2622
17 C. Kao, H.-Y. Cheng, W.-S. Hou, and J. Sayre Top decays with flavor changing neutral Higgs interactions at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 225 1112.1707
18 B. Altunkaynak et al. Flavor changing heavy Higgs interactions at the LHC PLB 751 (2015) 135 1506.00651
19 K.-F. Chen, W.-S. Hou, C. Kao, and M. Kohda When the Higgs meets the top: Search for $ t \to ch^0 $ at the LHC PLB 725 (2013) 378 1304.8037
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for top quark decays $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{q}\mathrm{H} $, with $ \mathrm{H} \to \gamma\gamma $, in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector JHEP 10 (2017) 129 1707.01404
21 ATLAS Collaboration Search for flavor-changing neutral currents in top quark decays $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{c} $ and $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{u} $ in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 98 (2018) 032002 1805.03483
22 ATLAS Collaboration Search for top-quark decays $ \mathrm{t} \to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{q} $ with 36 fb$ ^{-1} $ of pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 05 (2019) 123 1812.11568
23 CMS Collaboration Search for the flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark and the Higgs boson which decays into a pair of b quarks at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2018) 102 CMS-TOP-17-003
1712.02399
24 CMS Collaboration Search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark and the Higgs boson decaying to a bottom quark-antiquark pair at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 02 (2022) 169 CMS-TOP-19-002
2112.09734
25 CMS Collaboration Search for Flavor-Changing Neutral Current Interactions of the Top Quark and Higgs Boson in Final States with Two Photons in Proton-Proton Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV no.~3, 2022
PRL 129 (2022)
26 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
27 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13\,TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
28 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
29 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
30 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
31 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
32 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A Positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
33 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi $ W^+ W^- $, $ W Z $ and $ Z Z $ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2 EPJC 74 (2014) 2702 1311.1365
34 E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and A. Vicini Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM JHEP 02 (2012) 088 1111.2854
35 H. B. Hartanto, B. Jager, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX PRD 91 (2015) 094003 1501.04498
36 S. Bolognesi et al. On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC PRD 86 (2012) 095031 1208.4018
37 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
38 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
39 R. D. Ball et al. Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017)
40 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
41 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
42 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
43 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
44 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
45 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
46 \GEANTfour Collaboration GEANT 4 --- a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
47 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top$ ++ $: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930
48 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
49 CMS Collaboration Search for new physics in same-sign dilepton events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 13\,\text {TeV} $ EPJC 76 (2016)
50 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with jets and two same-sign or at least three charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=13\,{\text {tev}} $ EPJC 80 (2020)
51 CMS Collaboration Search for production of four top quarks in final states with same-sign or multiple leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=13\,\text {TeV} $ EPJC 80 (2020)
52 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
53 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
54 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
55 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014
56 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
57 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
58 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
59 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
60 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
61 E. Bols et al. Jet flavour classification using DeepJet JINST 15 (2020) P12012-
62 CMS Collaboration Performance of the DeepJet b tagging algorithm using 41.9 fb$ ^{-1} $ of data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with Phase-1 CMS detector CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2018-058, 2018
CDS
63 CMS Collaboration A new calibration method for charm jet identification validated with proton-proton collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 17 (2021) P03014
64 T. Chen and C. Guestrin Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '16, New York, NY, USA (2016)
link
65 F. Pedregosa et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011) 2825
66 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
67 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
68 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2019
link
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
69 S. Catani, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, and P. Nason Soft gluon resummation for Higgs boson production at hadron colliders JHEP 07 (2003) 028 hep-ph/0306211
70 M. Cacciari et al. The t anti-t cross-section at 1.8-TeV and 1.96-TeV: A Study of the systematics due to parton densities and scale dependence JHEP 04 (2004) 068 hep-ph/0303085
71 A. Kalogeropoulos and J. Alwall The syscalc code: A tool to derive theoretical systematic uncertainties 1801.08401
72 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive and differential wz production cross sections, polarization angles, and triple gauge couplings in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 tev
73 B. Biedermann, A. Denner, and M. Pellen Complete nlo corrections to w+w+ scattering and its irreducible background at the lhc JHEP 10 (2017) 124
74 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector link 1610.07922
75 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
76 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435
77 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ \text{CL}_{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
78 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011)
79 Particle Data Group Review of Particle Physics Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 100001
80 ATLAS, CMS, LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 technical report, CERN, Geneva, 2011
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN