CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-16-010 ; CERN-EP-2016-309
Search for dark matter and unparticles in events with a Z boson and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
JHEP 03 (2017) 061 [Erratum]
Abstract: A search for dark matter and unparticle production at the LHC has been performed using events containing two charged leptons (electrons or muons), consistent with the decay of a Z boson, and large missing transverse momentum. This study is based on data collected with the CMS detector in 2015, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at the LHC, at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. No excess over the standard model expectation is observed. Compared to previous searches in this topology, which exclusively relied on effective field theories, the results are interpreted in terms of a simplified model of dark matter production for both vector and axial vector couplings between a mediator and dark matter particles. The first study of this class of models using CMS data at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV is presented. Additionally, effective field theories of dark matter and unparticle production are used to interpret the data.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Leading order Feynman diagrams for production of DM pairs ($\chi \overline {\chi }$) in association with a Z boson. Left: the simplified model containing a spin-1 mediator A. The constant $g_\mathrm{ q } $ ($g_\chi $) is the coupling strength between A and quarks (DM).

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Leading order Feynman diagram for production of DM pairs ($\chi \overline {\chi }$) in association with a Z boson: the simplified model containing a spin-1 mediator A. The constant $g_\mathrm{ q } $ ($g_\chi $) is the coupling strength between A and quarks (DM).

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Leading order Feynman diagram for production of DM pairs ($\chi \overline {\chi }$) in association with a Z boson: an EFT benchmark with a DM pair coupling to gauge bosons via dimension-7 operators.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Leading order Feynman diagram for unparticle (denoted by U) production in association with a Z boson. The hatched circle indicates the interaction modeled with an EFT operator.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The distribution in ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ at the generator level, for the simplified DM model with vector mediator (upper left), EFT DM model (upper right), and unparticle scenarios (lower panel). The y-axis corresponds to the integrated cross section per bin divided by the total cross section and bin width. The DM curves are shown for different values of the vector mediator mass $M_\text {med}$ in the upper left panel and for different values of the DM mass $m_\chi $ in the upper right panel. The unparticle curves have the scalar unparticle coupling $\lambda $ between unparticle and SM fields set to 1. They are shown for several values of the scaling dimension $d_{\textsf {U}}$ ranging from 1.06 to 2.20, spanning the region of sensitivity of this analysis. The SM background $ {\mathrm{ Z } } {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \ell ^{-}\ell ^{+}\nu \bar{\nu} $ is shown as a red solid histogram. The rightmost bins include overflow.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The distribution in ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ at the generator level, for the simplified DM model with vector mediator. The y-axis corresponds to the integrated cross section per bin divided by the total cross section and bin width. The DM curves are shown for different values of the vector mediator mass $M_\text {med}$. The SM background $ {\mathrm{ Z } } {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \ell ^{-}\ell ^{+}\nu \bar{\nu} $ is shown as a red solid histogram. The rightmost bins include overflow.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The distribution in ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ at the generator level, for the EFT DM model. The y-axis corresponds to the integrated cross section per bin divided by the total cross section and bin width. The DM curves are shown for different values of the DM mass $m_\chi $. The SM background $ {\mathrm{ Z } } {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \ell ^{-}\ell ^{+}\nu \bar{\nu} $ is shown as a red solid histogram. The rightmost bins include overflow.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The distribution in ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}}$ at the generator level, for the unparticle scenario. The y-axis corresponds to the integrated cross section per bin divided by the total cross section and bin width. The unparticle curves have the scalar unparticle coupling $\lambda $ between unparticle and SM fields set to 1. They are shown for several values of the scaling dimension $d_{\textsf {U}}$ ranging from 1.06 to 2.20, spanning the region of sensitivity of this analysis. The SM background $ {\mathrm{ Z } } {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \ell ^{-}\ell ^{+}\nu \bar{\nu} $ is shown as a red solid histogram. The rightmost bins include overflow.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The distribution of $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ after preselection for the $ {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \mathrm{ e }^{+} \mathrm{ e }^{-} $ (left) and $ {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \mu^+ \mu^- $ (right) channels. Representative expected signal distributions are shown for the simplified model of DM production with vector couplings, the EFT scenario of DM production, and unparticles. The SM expectation is based on simulation only. The total statistical uncertainty in the overall background prediction is shown as a hatched region. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bins. The upper error bars on data points are shown for bins with zero entries (Garwood procedure) in the region up to the last non-zero entry. In the lower panels, the ratio between data and predicted background is shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The distribution of $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ after preselection for the $ {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \mathrm{ e }^{+} \mathrm{ e }^{-} $ channel. Representative expected signal distributions are shown for the simplified model of DM production with vector couplings, the EFT scenario of DM production, and unparticles. The SM expectation is based on simulation only. The total statistical uncertainty in the overall background prediction is shown as a hatched region. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bin. The upper error bars on data points are shown for bins with zero entries (Garwood procedure) in the region up to the last non-zero entry. In the lower panel, the ratio between data and predicted background is shown.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The distribution of $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ after preselection for the $ {\mathrm{ Z } } \to \mu^+ \mu^- $ channel. Representative expected signal distributions are shown for the simplified model of DM production with vector couplings, the EFT scenario of DM production, and unparticles. The SM expectation is based on simulation only. The total statistical uncertainty in the overall background prediction is shown as a hatched region. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bin. The upper error bars on data points are shown for bins with zero entries (Garwood procedure) in the region up to the last non-zero entry. In the lower panel, the ratio between data and predicted background is shown.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Distributions of $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ for the final selection in the $\mathrm{ e }^{+} \mathrm{ e }^{-} $ (left) and $\mu^+ \mu^- $ (right) channels. Expected signal distributions are shown for the simplified model of DM production with vector couplings, the EFT DM production benchmark, and unparticle model. The total uncertainty (stat.$\oplus $sys.) in the overall background is shown as a hatched region. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bins. In the lower panels, the ratio between data and predicted background is shown.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distributions of $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ for the final selection in the $\mathrm{ e }^{+} \mathrm{ e }^{-} $ channel. Expected signal distributions are shown for the simplified model of DM production with vector couplings, the EFT DM production benchmark, and unparticle model. The total uncertainty (stat.$\oplus $sys.) in the overall background is shown as a hatched region. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bin. In the lower panel, the ratio between data and predicted background is shown.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distributions of $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ for the final selection in the $\mu^+ \mu^- $ channel. Expected signal distributions are shown for the simplified model of DM production with vector couplings, the EFT DM production benchmark, and unparticle model. The total uncertainty (stat.$\oplus $sys.) in the overall background is shown as a hatched region. Overflow events are included in the rightmost bin. In the lower panel, the ratio between data and predicted background is shown.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The 95%CL observed limits on the signal strength $\sigma _\text {obs}/\sigma _{\rm theo}$ in both vector (left) and axial-vector (right) mediator scenarios, for mediator-quark coupling constant values $g_{\mathrm{ q } } = $ 0.25 (upper) and 1 (lower). In all cases, the DM-mediator coupling $g_{\chi }$ is set to one. The expected exclusion curves for unity signal strength are shown as a reference, with black dashed lines indicating the expected $\pm$1 s.d. interval due to experimental uncertainties. The red dashed lines show the influence of theory-related signal normalization uncertainties on the observed limits, which are estimated to be 15%. The solid line labeled ``$\Omega _c\times h^2 = $ 0.12" identifies the parameter region where no additional new physics beyond the simplified model is necessary to reproduce the observed DM relic abundance in the universe [34,74,73,1,72].

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The 95%CL observed limits on the signal strength $\sigma _\text {obs}/\sigma _{\rm theo}$ in the vector mediator scenario, for mediator-quark coupling constant values $g_{\mathrm{ q } } = $ 0.25. The DM-mediator coupling $g_{\chi }$ is set to one. The expected exclusion curves for unity signal strength are shown as a reference, with black dashed lines indicating the expected $\pm$1 s.d. interval due to experimental uncertainties. The red dashed lines show the influence of theory-related signal normalization uncertainties on the observed limits, which are estimated to be 15%. The solid line labeled ``$\Omega _c\times h^2 = $ 0.12" identifies the parameter region where no additional new physics beyond the simplified model is necessary to reproduce the observed DM relic abundance in the universe [34,74,73,1,72].

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The 95%CL observed limits on the signal strength $\sigma _\text {obs}/\sigma _{\rm theo}$ in the axial-vector mediator scenario, for mediator-quark coupling constant values $g_{\mathrm{ q } } = $ 0.25. The DM-mediator coupling $g_{\chi }$ is set to one. The expected exclusion curves for unity signal strength are shown as a reference, with black dashed lines indicating the expected $\pm$1 s.d. interval due to experimental uncertainties. The red dashed lines show the influence of theory-related signal normalization uncertainties on the observed limits, which are estimated to be 15%. The solid line labeled ``$\Omega _c\times h^2 = $ 0.12" identifies the parameter region where no additional new physics beyond the simplified model is necessary to reproduce the observed DM relic abundance in the universe [34,74,73,1,72].

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
The 95%CL observed limits on the signal strength $\sigma _\text {obs}/\sigma _{\rm theo}$ in the vector mediator scenario, for mediator-quark coupling constant values $g_{\mathrm{ q } } = $ 1. The DM-mediator coupling $g_{\chi }$ is set to one. The expected exclusion curves for unity signal strength are shown as a reference, with black dashed lines indicating the expected $\pm$1 s.d. interval due to experimental uncertainties. The red dashed lines show the influence of theory-related signal normalization uncertainties on the observed limits, which are estimated to be 15%. The solid line labeled ``$\Omega _c\times h^2 = $ 0.12" identifies the parameter region where no additional new physics beyond the simplified model is necessary to reproduce the observed DM relic abundance in the universe [34,74,73,1,72].

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
The 95%CL observed limits on the signal strength $\sigma _\text {obs}/\sigma _{\rm theo}$ in the axial-vector mediator scenario, for mediator-quark coupling constant values $g_{\mathrm{ q } } = $ 1. The DM-mediator coupling $g_{\chi }$ is set to one. The expected exclusion curves for unity signal strength are shown as a reference, with black dashed lines indicating the expected $\pm$1 s.d. interval due to experimental uncertainties. The red dashed lines show the influence of theory-related signal normalization uncertainties on the observed limits, which are estimated to be 15%. The solid line labeled ``$\Omega _c\times h^2 = $ 0.12" identifies the parameter region where no additional new physics beyond the simplified model is necessary to reproduce the observed DM relic abundance in the universe [34,74,73,1,72].

png pdf
Figure 7:
Observed 90% CL limits on the DM-nucleon scattering cross sections in both spin-independent (left) and spin-dependent (right) cases, assuming a mediator-quark coupling constant $g_{\mathrm{ q } } = $ 0.25 and mediator-DM coupling constant $g_{\chi } = $ 1. The line shading indicates the excluded region. Limits from the LUX [75], CDMSLite [76], PandaX-II [77], and CRESST-II [78] experiments are shown for the spin-independent case. Limits from the Super-Kamiokande [79], PICO-2L [80], PICO-60 [81], and IceCube [82] experiments are shown for the spin-dependent case.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Observed 90% CL limits on the DM-nucleon scattering cross sections in the spin-independent case, assuming a mediator-quark coupling constant $g_{\mathrm{ q } } = $ 0.25 and mediator-DM coupling constant $g_{\chi } = $ 1. The line shading indicates the excluded region. Limits from the LUX [75], CDMSLite [76], PandaX-II [77], and CRESST-II [78] experiments are shown for the spin-independent case. Limits from the Super-Kamiokande [79], PICO-2L [80], PICO-60 [81], and IceCube [82] experiments are shown for the spin-dependent case.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Observed 90% CL limits on the DM-nucleon scattering cross sections in the spin-dependent case, assuming a mediator-quark coupling constant $g_{\mathrm{ q } } = $ 0.25 and mediator-DM coupling constant $g_{\chi } = $ 1. The line shading indicates the excluded region. Limits from the LUX [75], CDMSLite [76], PandaX-II [77], and CRESST-II [78] experiments are shown for the spin-independent case. Limits from the Super-Kamiokande [79], PICO-2L [80], PICO-60 [81], and IceCube [82] experiments are shown for the spin-dependent case.

png pdf
Figure 8:
The 95%CL expected and observed limits on the cutoff scale $\Lambda $ of the EFT benchmark of DM production as a function of DM particle mass $m_\chi $.

png pdf
Figure 9:
The 95%CL observed limits on the cutoff scale $\Lambda $ (left) and signal strength $\sigma ^\text {obs}/\sigma ^\text {th}$ (right) as a function of coupling $c_1$ and DM mass $m_\chi $. The expected exclusion curves for unit signal strength are shown as a reference. The gray shaded area bounded by gray dashed lines indicates the expected $\pm$1 s.d. interval due to experimental uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
The 95%CL observed limits on the cutoff scale $\Lambda $ as a function of coupling $c_1$ and DM mass $m_\chi $. The expected exclusion curves for unit signal strength are shown as a reference. The gray shaded area bounded by gray dashed lines indicates the expected $\pm$1 s.d. interval due to experimental uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
The 95%CL observed limits on the signal strength $\sigma ^\text {obs}/\sigma ^\text {th}$ as a function of coupling $c_1$ and DM mass $m_\chi $. The expected exclusion curves for unit signal strength are shown as a reference. The gray shaded area bounded by gray dashed lines indicates the expected $\pm$1 s.d. interval due to experimental uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 10:
The 95% CL lower limits on the effective unparticle cutoff scale $\Lambda_{\textsf {U}}$ for a fixed coupling $\lambda =1$. The results from the CMS monojet [15] and mono-Z [17] searches, as well as a reinterpretation of LEP and CDF searches [83] are shown for comparison. The LEP results assume a coupling of unparticles to Z bosons and photons. The CDF (CMS) monojet result is based on a gluon-unparticle coupling operator (gluon- and quark-unparticle coupling operators). The inset compares the expected and observed limits for the CMS mono-Z analyses at $\sqrt {s}=$ 8 and 13 TeV. Note that the cutoff scales $\Lambda_{\textsf {U}}$ for different operators do not have to be identical. Consequently, the comparison shown here with the results other than the CMS 8 TeV mono-Z analysis is only qualitative.

png pdf
Figure 11:
The model-independent upper limits at 95% CL on the visible cross section ($\sigma A \epsilon $) for BSM production of events, as a function of $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ threshold. The values plotted correspond to those given in Table 4.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of selections used in the analysis.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of systematic uncertainties. Each background uncertainty represents the variation of the relative yields of the particular background components. The signal uncertainties represent the relative variations in the signal acceptance, and the ranges quoted cover both signals of DM and unparticles with different DM masses or scaling dimensions. For shape uncertainties, the numbers correspond to the overall effect of the shape variation on the yield or acceptance. The symbol `` -- '' indicates that the systematic uncertainty is not applicable. The impact of each group of systematic uncertainties is calculated by performing a maximum likelihood fit to obtain the signal strength with each parameter separately varied by its uncertainty. The number given in the impact column is the relative change of the expected best fit signal strength that is introduced by the variation for the simplified model signal scenario with a vector mediator of mass 200 GeV, DM of mass 50 GeV, and coupling $g_{\mathrm{ q } }=$ 1.0.

png pdf
Table 3:
Signal predictions and background estimates for the final selection with $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} > $ 80 GeV. The DM signal yields from the simplified model are given for mass $m_\chi = $ 50 GeV and a mediator mass $M_\text {med} = $ 200 GeV for both the vector and axial-vector coupling scenarios. For the EFT benchmark with DM pair coupling to gauge bosons, the signal yields are given for $m_\chi = $ 1 GeV, cutoff scale $\Lambda = $ 300 GeV, and the coupling $c_1= $ 1. Yields for the unparticle model are shown for scaling dimension $d_\mathsf {U}= $ 1.05, and cutoff scale $\Lambda = $ 15 TeV. The corresponding statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown, in that order.

png pdf
Table 4:
Total SM background predictions for the numbers of events passing the selection requirements, for different $ {E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $ thresholds, compared with the observed numbers of events. The listed uncertainties include both statistical and systematic components. The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits for the contribution of events from BSM sources are also shown. In addition, the ${\pm }$1 s.d. and ${\pm }$2 s.d. excursions from expected limits are given.
Summary
A search for physics beyond the standard model has been performed in events with a Z boson and missing transverse momentum, using a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.3 fb$^{-1}$ of pp collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The observed data are consistent with the expected standard model processes. The results are analyzed to obtain limits in three different scenarios of physics beyond the standard model. In a simplified model of DM production via a vector or axial vector mediator, 95% confidence level limits are obtained on the masses of the DM particles and the mediator. Limits on the DM-nucleon scattering cross section are set at 90% confidence level in spin-dependent and spin-independent coupling scenarios. In an effective field theory approach, limits are set on the DM coupling parameters to $U(1)$ and $SU(2)$ gauge fields and on the scale of new physics. For an unparticle model, 95% confidence level limits are obtained on the effective cutoff scale as a function of the scaling dimension. In addition, model-independent limits on the contribution to the visible Z+$E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ cross section from non-standard-model sources are presented as a function of the minimum requirement on $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}}$. These results are the first in this signal topology to be interpreted in terms of a simplified model. Furthermore, the limits on unparticle production are the first of their kind to be presented at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV.
References
1 Planck Collaboration Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 1502.01589
2 P. Cushman et al. Snowmass CF1 Summary: WIMP Dark Matter Direct Detection 1310.8327
3 J. Buckley et al. Indirect dark matter detection CF2 working group summary 1310.7040
4 D. Abercrombie et al. Dark Matter Benchmark Models for Early LHC Run-2 Searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum 1507.00966
5 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dark matter in events with a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and missing transverse momentum in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 tev with the ATLAS detector PRL 112 (2014) 041802 1309.4017
6 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dark matter in events with a $ Z $ boson and missing transverse momentum in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 90 (2014) 012004 1404.0051
7 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new particles in events with one lepton and missing transverse momentum in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2014) 037 1407.7494
8 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in final states with a lepton and missing transverse energy in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 91 (2015) 092005 CMS-EXO-12-060
1408.2745
9 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dark matter in events with heavy quarks and missing transverse momentum in $ pp $ collisions with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 92 1410.4031
10 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in events with a photon and missing transverse momentum in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 91 (2015) 012008 1411.1559
11 CMS Collaboration Search for monotop signatures in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV PRL 114 (2015) 101801 CMS-B2G-12-022
1410.1149
12 ATLAS Collaboration Search for invisible particles produced in association with single-top-quarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 79 1410.5404
13 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dark matter in events with missing transverse momentum and a higgs boson decaying to two photons in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRL 115 (2015) 131801 1506.01081
14 CMS Collaboration Search for the production of dark matter in association with top-quark pairs in the single-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2015) 121 CMS-B2G-14-004
1504.03198
15 CMS Collaboration Search for dark matter, extra dimensions, and unparticles in monojet events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 235 CMS-EXO-12-048
1408.3583
16 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 299 1502.01518
17 CMS Collaboration Search for dark matter and unparticles produced in association with a Z boson in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt s= $ 8 TeV PRD 93 (2016) 052011 CMS-EXO-12-054
1511.09375
18 CMS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in monophoton final states in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt s = $ 8 TeV PLB 755 (2016) 102 CMS-EXO-12-047
1410.8812
19 CMS Collaboration Search for dark matter in proton-proton collisions at 8 TeV with missing transverse momentum and vector boson tagged jets JHEP 12 (2016) 083 CMS-EXO-12-055
1607.05764
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for dark matter produced in association with a hadronically decaying vector boson in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 763 (2016) 251 1608.02372
21 H. Georgi Unparticle physics PRL 98 (2007) 221601 hep-ph/0703260
22 H. Georgi Another odd thing about unparticle physics PLB 650 (2007) 275 0704.2457
23 K. Cheung, W.-Y. Keung, and T.-C. Yuan Collider signals of unparticle physics PRL 99 (2007) 051803 0704.2588
24 K. Cheung, W.-Y. Keung, and T.-C. Yuan Collider phenomenology of unparticle physics PRD 76 (2007) 055003 0706.3155
25 Z. Kang Upgrading sterile neutrino dark matter to FI$ m $P using scale invariance EPJC 75 (2015) 471 1411.2773
26 M. Rinaldi, G. Cognola, L. Vanzo, and S. Zerbini Inflation in scale-invariant theories of gravity PRD 91 (2015) 123527 1410.0631
27 H. Cheng The possible existence of Weyl's vector meson PRL 61 (1988) 2182
28 T. Banks and A. Zaks On the phase structure of vector-like gauge theories with massless fermions NPB 196 (1982) 189
29 S. Ask et al. Real emission and virtual exchange of gravitons and unparticles in PYTHIA8 CPC 181 (2010) 1593 0912.4233
30 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
31 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
32 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
33 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
34 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
35 G. Busoni et al. Recommendations on presenting LHC searches for missing transverse energy signals using simplified $ s $-channel models of dark matter 1603.04156
36 S. Ask Simulation of $ Z $ plus graviton/unparticle production at the LHC EPJC 60 (2009) 509 0809.4750
37 P. Nason A new method for combining nlo qcd with shower monte carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
38 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching nlo qcd computations with parton shower simulations: the powheg method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
39 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower monte carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
40 E. Re Single-top $ W t $-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
41 S. Alioli, S.-O. Moch, and P. Uwer Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering JHEP 01 (2012) 137 1110.5251
42 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC NPPS 205 (2010) 10 1007.3492
43 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush FEWZ 2.0: A code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order CPC 182 (2011) 2388 1011.3540
44 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in the framework of the FEWZ simulation code PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
45 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
46 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
47 J. Allison et al. Geant4 developments and applications IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270
48 CMS Collaboration CMS tracking performance results from early LHC operation EPJC 70 (2010) 1165 CMS-TRK-10-001
1007.1988
49 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CMS-PAS-PFT-09-001
50 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CMS-PAS-PFT-10-001
51 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) 06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
52 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) 10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
53 CMS Collaboration Reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ lepton decays to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ at CMS JINST 11 (2016) P01019 CMS-TAU-14-001
1510.07488
54 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
55 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
56 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Dispelling the $ N^{3} $ myth for the $ k_{t} $ jet-finder PLB 641 (2006) 57 hep-ph/0512210
57 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
58 Particle Data Group, K. A. Olive et al. Review of Particle Physics CPC 38 (2014) 090001
59 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) 04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
60 CMS Collaboration Identification of b quark jets at the CMS Experiment in the LHC Run 2 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001
61 M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and D. Rathlev ZZ production at the LHC: Fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD PLB 750 (2015) 407 1507.06257
62 A. Bierweiler, T. Kasprzik, and J. H. Kuhn Vector-boson pair production at the LHC to $ \mathcal{O}(\alpha^3) $ accuracy JHEP 12 (2013) 071 1305.5402
63 S. Gieseke, T. Kasprzik, and J. H. Kuhn Vector-boson pair production and electroweak corrections in HERWIG++ EPJC 74 (2014) 2988 1401.3964
64 J. Baglio, L. D. Ninh, and M. M. Weber Massive gauge boson pair production at the LHC: a next-to-leading order story PRD 88 (2013) 113005 1307.4331
65 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive $ W $ and $ Z $ production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
66 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
67 CMS Collaboration CMS Luminosity Measurement for the 2015 Data Taking Period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
68 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PRL 117 (2016), no. 18, 182002 1606.02625
69 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
70 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ CL_{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
71 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 \mbox ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, CMS NOTE 2011/005
72 T. du Pree, K. Hahn, P. Harris, and C. Roskas Cosmological constraints on Dark Matter models for collider searches 1603.08525
73 M. Backovic, K. Kong, and M. McCaskey MadDM v.1.0: Computation of Dark Matter Relic Abundance Using MadGraph5 Physics of the Dark Universe 5-6 (2014) 18 1308.4955
74 G. Hinshaw et al. Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results Astrophys. J. Suppl. 208 (2013) 19 1212.5226
75 LUX Collaboration Results from a search for dark matter in LUX with 332 live days of exposure 1608.07648
76 SuperCDMS Collaboration New Results from the Search for Low-Mass Weakly Interacting Massive Particles with the CDMS Low Ionization Threshold Experiment PRL 116 (2016) 071301 1509.02448
77 PandaX-II Collaboration Dark Matter Results from First 98.7-day Data of PandaX-II Experiment 1607.07400
78 CRESST Collaboration Results on light dark matter particles with a low-threshold CRESST-II detector EPJC 76 (2016) 25 1509.01515
79 Super-Kamiokande Collaboration Search for neutrinos from annihilation of captured low-mass dark matter particles in the Sun by Super-Kamiokande PRL 114 (2015) 141301 1503.04858
80 PICO Collaboration Improved dark matter search results from PICO-2L Run 2 PRD 93 (2016) 061101 1601.03729
81 PICO Collaboration Dark matter search results from the PICO-60 CF$ _3 $I bubble chamber PRD 93 (2016) 052014 1510.07754
82 IceCube Collaboration Improved limits on dark matter annihilation in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector and implications for supersymmetry JCAP 04 (2016) 022 1601.00653
83 S. Kathrein, S. Knapen, and M. J. Strassler Bounds from LEP on unparticle interactions with electroweak bosons PRD 84 (2011) 015010 1012.3737
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN