CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SUS-23-002
Search for supersymmetric particle pair production in final states with two oppositely charged leptons and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV.
Abstract: A search for pair production of supersymmetric particles in events with two oppositely charged leptons (electrons or muons) and missing transverse momentum is reported. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. No significant deviation is observed from the predicted standard model background. The results are interpreted in terms of several simplified models for chargino or slepton pair production, assuming $ R $-parity conservation and with the neutralino as the lightest supersymmetric particle. For the chargino production, an exclusion region in the ($ m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^{\pm}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0} $) plane is determined, extending to chargino masses of 1100 GeV and neutralino masses of 480 GeV, while slepton masses are excluded up to 700 GeV and neutralino masses up to 360 GeV.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Simplified-model diagrams of chargino pair production with two benchmark decay modes: the left plot shows decays through intermediate sleptons or sneutrinos, while the right one displays prompt decays into a W boson and the lightest neutralino.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Simplified-model diagrams of chargino pair production with two benchmark decay modes: the left plot shows decays through intermediate sleptons or sneutrinos, while the right one displays prompt decays into a W boson and the lightest neutralino.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Simplified-model diagrams of chargino pair production with two benchmark decay modes: the left plot shows decays through intermediate sleptons or sneutrinos, while the right one displays prompt decays into a W boson and the lightest neutralino.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Simplified-model diagram of charged slepton pair production. We focus on a scenario where each slepton decays into a charged lepton and a neutralino.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ after the fit to data for DF events in the chargino/slepton SRs. The first two rows are for events without b-tagged jets and with 160 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 220 GeV and 220 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 280 GeV, respectively, further divided in events with no jets (left plots) or with at least one jet (right plots). The last row is for events without b-tagged jets and with 280 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 380 GeV (left plot) and $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss}\ge $ 380 GeV (right plot). The grey histogram shows the expected $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ distribution for chargino pair production with $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= $ 800 GeV and $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}= $ 200 GeV. The expected total SM contributions before the fit (cyan dashed line) is also shown. The last bin includes the overflow entries. In the bottom panel, the ratio of data and SM expectations is shown for the expected total SM contribution after the fit using the background-only hypothesis (black dots) and before any fit (cyn dashed line). The hatched band represents the total uncertainty after the fit.

png
Figure 3-a:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ after the fit to data for DF events in the chargino/slepton SRs. The first two rows are for events without b-tagged jets and with 160 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 220 GeV and 220 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 280 GeV, respectively, further divided in events with no jets (left plots) or with at least one jet (right plots). The last row is for events without b-tagged jets and with 280 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 380 GeV (left plot) and $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss}\ge $ 380 GeV (right plot). The grey histogram shows the expected $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ distribution for chargino pair production with $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= $ 800 GeV and $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}= $ 200 GeV. The expected total SM contributions before the fit (cyan dashed line) is also shown. The last bin includes the overflow entries. In the bottom panel, the ratio of data and SM expectations is shown for the expected total SM contribution after the fit using the background-only hypothesis (black dots) and before any fit (cyn dashed line). The hatched band represents the total uncertainty after the fit.

png
Figure 3-b:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ after the fit to data for DF events in the chargino/slepton SRs. The first two rows are for events without b-tagged jets and with 160 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 220 GeV and 220 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 280 GeV, respectively, further divided in events with no jets (left plots) or with at least one jet (right plots). The last row is for events without b-tagged jets and with 280 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 380 GeV (left plot) and $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss}\ge $ 380 GeV (right plot). The grey histogram shows the expected $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ distribution for chargino pair production with $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= $ 800 GeV and $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}= $ 200 GeV. The expected total SM contributions before the fit (cyan dashed line) is also shown. The last bin includes the overflow entries. In the bottom panel, the ratio of data and SM expectations is shown for the expected total SM contribution after the fit using the background-only hypothesis (black dots) and before any fit (cyn dashed line). The hatched band represents the total uncertainty after the fit.

png
Figure 3-c:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ after the fit to data for DF events in the chargino/slepton SRs. The first two rows are for events without b-tagged jets and with 160 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 220 GeV and 220 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 280 GeV, respectively, further divided in events with no jets (left plots) or with at least one jet (right plots). The last row is for events without b-tagged jets and with 280 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 380 GeV (left plot) and $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss}\ge $ 380 GeV (right plot). The grey histogram shows the expected $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ distribution for chargino pair production with $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= $ 800 GeV and $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}= $ 200 GeV. The expected total SM contributions before the fit (cyan dashed line) is also shown. The last bin includes the overflow entries. In the bottom panel, the ratio of data and SM expectations is shown for the expected total SM contribution after the fit using the background-only hypothesis (black dots) and before any fit (cyn dashed line). The hatched band represents the total uncertainty after the fit.

png
Figure 3-d:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ after the fit to data for DF events in the chargino/slepton SRs. The first two rows are for events without b-tagged jets and with 160 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 220 GeV and 220 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 280 GeV, respectively, further divided in events with no jets (left plots) or with at least one jet (right plots). The last row is for events without b-tagged jets and with 280 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 380 GeV (left plot) and $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss}\ge $ 380 GeV (right plot). The grey histogram shows the expected $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ distribution for chargino pair production with $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= $ 800 GeV and $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}= $ 200 GeV. The expected total SM contributions before the fit (cyan dashed line) is also shown. The last bin includes the overflow entries. In the bottom panel, the ratio of data and SM expectations is shown for the expected total SM contribution after the fit using the background-only hypothesis (black dots) and before any fit (cyn dashed line). The hatched band represents the total uncertainty after the fit.

png
Figure 3-e:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ after the fit to data for DF events in the chargino/slepton SRs. The first two rows are for events without b-tagged jets and with 160 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 220 GeV and 220 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 280 GeV, respectively, further divided in events with no jets (left plots) or with at least one jet (right plots). The last row is for events without b-tagged jets and with 280 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 380 GeV (left plot) and $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss}\ge $ 380 GeV (right plot). The grey histogram shows the expected $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ distribution for chargino pair production with $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= $ 800 GeV and $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}= $ 200 GeV. The expected total SM contributions before the fit (cyan dashed line) is also shown. The last bin includes the overflow entries. In the bottom panel, the ratio of data and SM expectations is shown for the expected total SM contribution after the fit using the background-only hypothesis (black dots) and before any fit (cyn dashed line). The hatched band represents the total uncertainty after the fit.

png
Figure 3-f:
Distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ after the fit to data for DF events in the chargino/slepton SRs. The first two rows are for events without b-tagged jets and with 160 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 220 GeV and 220 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 280 GeV, respectively, further divided in events with no jets (left plots) or with at least one jet (right plots). The last row is for events without b-tagged jets and with 280 $ \le p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} < $ 380 GeV (left plot) and $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss}\ge $ 380 GeV (right plot). The grey histogram shows the expected $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ distribution for chargino pair production with $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= $ 800 GeV and $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}= $ 200 GeV. The expected total SM contributions before the fit (cyan dashed line) is also shown. The last bin includes the overflow entries. In the bottom panel, the ratio of data and SM expectations is shown for the expected total SM contribution after the fit using the background-only hypothesis (black dots) and before any fit (cyn dashed line). The hatched band represents the total uncertainty after the fit.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The same distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ as Fig. 3, but for SF events.

png
Figure 4-a:
The same distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ as Fig. 3, but for SF events.

png
Figure 4-b:
The same distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ as Fig. 3, but for SF events.

png
Figure 4-c:
The same distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ as Fig. 3, but for SF events.

png
Figure 4-d:
The same distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ as Fig. 3, but for SF events.

png
Figure 4-e:
The same distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ as Fig. 3, but for SF events.

png
Figure 4-f:
The same distributions of $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ as Fig. 3, but for SF events.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the chargino pair production cross section as a function of the chargino and neutralino masses. The plot on the left shows the results when the chargino undergoes a cascade decay $ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\to\widetilde{\ell}\nu (\ell\tilde{\nu}) \to\ell\nu\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} $. The plot on the right gives the limits assuming chargino decays into a neutralino and a W boson ($ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\to\mathrm{W}\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} $). Exclusion regions in the plane ($ m_{ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} }$, $ m_{ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} } $) are determined by comparing the upper limits with the NLO+NLL production cross sections. The thick dashed red line shows the expected exclusion region. The thin dashed (dotted) red lines show the 1 (2) $ \sigma $ variation of the expected exclusion regions due to the experimental uncertainties. The thick black line shows the observed exclusion region, while the thin black lines show the variation of the observed exclusion regions due to the theoretical uncertainties in the production cross section.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the chargino pair production cross section as a function of the chargino and neutralino masses. The plot on the left shows the results when the chargino undergoes a cascade decay $ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\to\widetilde{\ell}\nu (\ell\tilde{\nu}) \to\ell\nu\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} $. The plot on the right gives the limits assuming chargino decays into a neutralino and a W boson ($ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\to\mathrm{W}\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} $). Exclusion regions in the plane ($ m_{ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} }$, $ m_{ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} } $) are determined by comparing the upper limits with the NLO+NLL production cross sections. The thick dashed red line shows the expected exclusion region. The thin dashed (dotted) red lines show the 1 (2) $ \sigma $ variation of the expected exclusion regions due to the experimental uncertainties. The thick black line shows the observed exclusion region, while the thin black lines show the variation of the observed exclusion regions due to the theoretical uncertainties in the production cross section.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Upper limits at 95% CL on the chargino pair production cross section as a function of the chargino and neutralino masses. The plot on the left shows the results when the chargino undergoes a cascade decay $ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\to\widetilde{\ell}\nu (\ell\tilde{\nu}) \to\ell\nu\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} $. The plot on the right gives the limits assuming chargino decays into a neutralino and a W boson ($ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\to\mathrm{W}\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} $). Exclusion regions in the plane ($ m_{ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} }$, $ m_{ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} } $) are determined by comparing the upper limits with the NLO+NLL production cross sections. The thick dashed red line shows the expected exclusion region. The thin dashed (dotted) red lines show the 1 (2) $ \sigma $ variation of the expected exclusion regions due to the experimental uncertainties. The thick black line shows the observed exclusion region, while the thin black lines show the variation of the observed exclusion regions due to the theoretical uncertainties in the production cross section.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Upper limits at 95% CL on slepton pair production cross section as a function of the slepton and neutralino masses. Exclusion regions in the plane ($ m_{ \widetilde{\ell} } $, $ m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} } $) are determined by comparing the upper limits with the NLO+NLL production cross sections. The thick dashed red line shows the expected exclusion region. The thin dashed (dotted) red lines show the 1 (2) $ \sigma $ variation of the expected exclusion regions due to the experimental uncertainties. The thick black line shows the observed exclusion region, while the thin black lines show the variation of the observed exclusion regions due to the theoretical uncertainties in the production cross section.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Baseline selection used in the searches for all the considered models.

png pdf
Table 2:
Definition of the SRs for the chargino and slepton searches as a function of the $ p_{\mathrm{T}}^\text{miss} $ value, the b-jet multiplicity and jet multiplicity, and the lepton pair channels. Also shown are the CRs with b-tagged jets used for the normalization of the $ \mathrm{t} \overline{\mathrm{t}} $ and $ \mathrm{t}\mathrm{W} $ backgrounds. The last row shows the $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ binning used in the ML fit performed to extract the signal.

png pdf
Table 3:
Sizes of systematic uncertainties in the predicted yields for SM processes. The first column shows the range of the uncertainties in the global background normalization across the different SRs. The second column quantifies the effect on the $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ shape. This is computed by taking the maximum variation across the $ m_{\mathrm{T2}}(\ell\ell) $ bins (after renormalizing for the global change of all the distribution) in each SR. The range of this variation across the SRs is given.

png pdf
Table 4:
Same as in Table 3 for a representative signal mass hypothesis of chargino pair production.

png pdf
Table 5:
Observed and expected yields of DF (upper half) and SF (lower half) events in the SRs for the chargino/slepton search. The quoted uncertainties in the background predictions include statistical and systematic contributions.
Summary
A search has been presented for new physics in events with two oppositely charged isolated leptons and missing transverse momentum in 138 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data collected by the CMS detector during the LHC operation at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. No significant evidence for a deviation with respect to standard model predictions was observed. The results have been interpreted as upper limits on the cross sections of supersymmetric particle production for several simplified model spectra. Chargino pair production has been investigated in two possible decay modes. If the chargino is assumed to undergo a cascade decay through sleptons, an exclusion region in the ($ m_{ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} } $, $ m_{ \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0} } $) plane is derived, extending to chargino masses of 1100 GeV and neutralino masses of 480 GeV. Lastly, slepton pair production has been considered, excluding slepton masses up to 700 GeV and neutralino masses up to 360 GeV.
References
1 E. Gildener and S. Weinberg Symmetry breaking and scalar bosons PRD 13 (1976) 3333
2 G. 't Hooft Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135
3 G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 hep-ph/0404175
4 J. L. Feng Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48 (2010) 495 1003.0904
5 T. A. Porter, R. P. Johnson, and P. W. Graham Dark matter searches with astroparticle data Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 49 (2011) 155 1104.2836
6 P. Ramond Dual theory for free fermions PRD 3 (1971) 2415
7 Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman Extension of the algebra of Poincaré group generators and violation of P invariance JETP Lett. 13 (1971) 323
8 A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz Factorizable dual model of pions NPB 31 (1971) 86
9 D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov Possible universal neutrino interaction JETP Lett. 16 (1972) 438
10 J. Wess and B. Zumino A Lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations PLB 49 (1974) 52
11 J. Wess and B. Zumino Supergauge transformations in four dimensions NPB 70 (1974) 39
12 P. Fayet Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino NPB 90 (1975) 104
13 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics Phys. Rep. 110 (1984) 1
14 S. P. Martin A Supersymmetry primer Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics 21 (2010) 1 hep-ph/9709356
15 E. Witten Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry NPB 188 (1981) 513
16 S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5) NPB 193 (1981) 150
17 Kaul, R. K. and Majumdar, P. Cancellation of quadratically divergent mass corrections in globally supersymmetric spontaneously broken gauge theories NPB 199 (1982) 36
18 G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry PLB 76 (1978) 575
19 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
20 J. Alwall, P. Schuster, and N. Toro Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC PRD 79 (2009) 075020 0810.3921
21 J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti, and J. G. Wacker Model-independent jets plus missing energy searches PRD 79 (2009) 015005 0809.3264
22 LHC New Physics Working Group Collaboration Simplified Models for LHC New Physics Searches JPG 39 (2012) 105005 1105.2838
23 CMS Collaboration Searches for pair production of charginos and top squarks in final states with two oppositely charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2018) 079 CMS-SUS-17-010
1807.07799
24 CMS Collaboration Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in final states containing hadronic decays of WW, WZ, or WH and missing transverse momentum PLB 842 (2023) 137460 CMS-SUS-21-002
2205.09597
25 CMS Collaboration General search for supersymmetric particles in scenarios with compressed mass spectra using proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV technical report, CERN, Geneva, 2024
CDS
26 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct pair production of sleptons and charginos decaying to two leptons and neutralinos with mass splittings near the W-boson mass in $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 06 (2023) 031 2209.13935
27 ATLAS Collaboration Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV $ pp $ collisions using the ATLAS detector EPJC 80 (2020) 123 1908.08215
28 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct production of electroweakinos in final states with one lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum and in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector link
29 ATLAS Collaboration Search for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in final states with two \ensuremath\tau-leptons in $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 05 (2024) 150 2402.00603
30 ATLAS Collaboration Search for direct production of electroweakinos in final states with one lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 12 (2023) 167 2310.08171
31 ATLAS Collaboration A statistical combination of ATLAS Run 2 searches for charginos and neutralinos at the LHC Submitted to Physics Reports, 2024 2402.08347
32 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in final states with two oppositely charged same-flavor leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 04 (2021) 123 CMS-SUS-20-001
2012.08600
33 CMS Collaboration Search for supersymmetry in final states with two or three soft leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV JHEP 04 (2022) 091 CMS-SUS-18-004
2111.06296
34 CMS Collaboration Combined search for electroweak production of winos, binos, higgsinos, and sleptons in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV PRD 109 (2024) 112001 CMS-SUS-21-008
2402.01888
35 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
36 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
37 P. Nason A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
38 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
39 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
40 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
41 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
42 N. Kidonakis NNLL threshold resummation for top-pair and single-top production Phys. Part. Nucl. 45 (2014) 714 1210.7813
43 Melia, T. and Nason, P. and Rontsch, R. and Zanderighi, G. W$ ^+ $W$ ^- $, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX JHEP 11 (2011) 078 1107.5051
44 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi W$ ^+ $W$ ^- $, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2 EPJC 74 (2014) 2702 1311.1365
45 T. Gehrmann et al. W$ ^{+} $W$ ^{-} $ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD PRL 113 (2014) 212001 1408.5243
46 CMS Collaboration Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 11 (2017) 047 CMS-HIG-16-041
1706.09936
47 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 205 (2010) 10 1007.3492
48 F. Caola, K. Melnikov, R. Rtsch, and L. Tancredi QCD corrections to W$ ^+ $W$ ^{-} $ production through gluon fusion PLB 754 (2016) 275 1511.08617
49 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
50 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush FEWZ 2.0: A code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2388 1011.3540
51 M. V. Garzelli, A. Kardos, C. G. Papadopoulos, and Z. Trocsanyi $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} $W$ ^{\pm} $ and $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} $Z hadroproduction at NLO accuracy in QCD with parton shower and hadronization effects JHEP 11 (2012) 056 1208.2665
52 LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs Properties CERN, 2013
link
1307.1347
53 W. Beenakker et al. Production of charginos, neutralinos, and sleptons at hadron colliders PRL 83 (1999) 3780 hep-ph/9906298
54 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Gaugino production in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2012) 081 1207.2159
55 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Precision predictions for electroweak superpartner production at hadron colliders with Resummino EPJC 73 (2013) 2480 1304.0790
56 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Revisiting slepton pair production at the Large Hadron Collider JHEP 01 (2014) 168 1310.2621
57 W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Squark and gluino production at hadron colliders NPB 492 (1997) 51 hep-ph/9610490
58 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Threshold resummation for squark-antisquark and gluino-pair production at the LHC PRL 102 (2009) 111802 0807.2405
59 A. Kulesza and L. Motyka Soft gluon resummation for the production of gluino-gluino and squark-antisquark pairs at the LHC PRD 80 (2009) 095004 0905.4749
60 W. Beenakker et al. Soft-gluon resummation for squark and gluino hadroproduction JHEP 12 (2009) 041 0909.4418
61 W. Beenakker et al. Squark and Gluino Hadroproduction Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 2637 1105.1110
62 C. Borschensky et al. Squark and gluino production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13, 14, 33 and 100 TeV EPJC 74 (2014) 3174 1407.5066
63 W. Beenakker et al. NNLL resummation for squark-antisquark pair production at the LHC JHEP 01 (2012) 076 1110.2446
64 W. Beenakker et al. Towards NNLL resummation: hard matching coefficients for squark and gluino hadroproduction JHEP 10 (2013) 120 1304.6354
65 W. Beenakker et al. NNLL resummation for squark and gluino production at the LHC JHEP 12 (2014) 023 1404.3134
66 W. Beenakker et al. NNLL-fast: predictions for coloured supersymmetric particle production at the LHC with threshold and Coulomb resummation JHEP 12 (2016) 133 1607.07741
67 W. Beenakker et al. Stop production at hadron colliders NPB 515 (1998) 3 hep-ph/9710451
68 W. Beenakker et al. Supersymmetric top and bottom squark production at hadron colliders JHEP 08 (2010) 098 1006.4771
69 W. Beenakker et al. NNLL resummation for stop pair-production at the LHC JHEP 05 (2016) 153 1601.02954
70 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
71 T. Sjöstrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
72 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
73 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
74 S. Abdullin et al. The Fast Simulation of the CMS detector at LHC J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032049
75 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
76 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
77 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
78 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
79 CMS Collaboration ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run2 summary plots CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2020-021, 2020
CDS
80 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
81 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
82 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
83 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
84 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
85 C. G. Lester and D. J. Summers Measuring masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders PLB 463 (1999) 99 hep-ph/9906349
86 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
87 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary , CERN, 2018
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
88 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary , CERN, 2019
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002
89 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
90 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
91 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV PRD 95 (2017) 092001 CMS-TOP-16-008
1610.04191
92 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross section for top quark pair production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 542 CMS-TOP-12-028
1505.04480
93 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ {\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}} $ production cross section in the all-jets final state in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 128 CMS-TOP-14-018
1509.06076
94 J. S. Conway Incorporating Nuisance Parameters in Likelihoods for Multisource Spectra 1103.0354
95 R. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples Computer Physics Communications 77 (1993) 219
96 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIM A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
97 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The CL$ _{\text{s}} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
98 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN