CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-BPH-23-001
Measurement of the ratio of the $ \text{B}_\text{c}^{+}\to\text{J}/\psi\tau^{+}\nu_\tau $ and $ \text{B}_\text{c}^{+}\to\text{J}/\psi\mu^{+}\nu_\mu $ branching fractions using three-prong $ \tau $ lepton decays in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $ \mathcal{R}_{\text{J}/\psi} = \mathcal{B}(\text{B}_\text{c}^{+}\to\text{J}/\psi\tau^{+}\nu_\tau) / \mathcal{B}(\text{B}_\text{c}^{+}\to\text{J}/\psi\mu^{+}\nu_\mu) $ in the decay channel with $ \text{J}/\psi(\rightarrow\mu^{+}\mu^{-}) $ and $ \tau^{+}\rightarrow\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}(+\pi^{0})\bar{\nu}_{\tau} $ (and charge-conjugated processes) is presented. This measurement uses a sample of proton-proton collision data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $, collected at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV by the CMS experiment in the LHC Run 2. The ratio is measured to be $ \mathcal{R}_{\text{J}/\psi}= 1.04 _{-0.44}^{+0.50} $, which in combination with the measurement of $ \mathcal{R}_{\text{J}/\psi} $ in the decay channel with $ \text{J}/\psi\rightarrow\mu^{+}\mu^{-} $ and $ \tau^{+}\rightarrow\mu^{+}\nu_{\mu}\bar{\nu}_{\tau} $, yields $ \mathcal{R}_{\text{J}/\psi}= $ 0.49 $ \pm $ 0.25 $ \,\mathrm{(stat)} \pm 0.09\,\mathrm{(syst)} $ in agreement with the value predicted by the standard model of particle physics, 0.258 $ \pm $ 0.004.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Tree level $ \mathrm{b}\to\mathrm{c}\ell\nu $ transition representation: in the SM, the vertex is mediated by a W boson exchange, while in BSM scenarios other contributions could be foreseen.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distribution of the BDT score. The data, represented by black points, is compared to the expectations from simulations (where $ \mathrm{H}_\mathrm{b}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mathrm{X} $ shown in orange, $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \tau^{+}\nu_{\!\tau} $ in purple, $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mathrm{D}_\mathrm{s}^{(\ast)+} $ in cyan and $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\rightarrow\mathrm{others} $ in lime green). The $ \mathrm{H}_\mathrm{b}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mathrm{X} $ simulated contribution is normalized to match the yield in data, as obtained following the application of all event selection criteria except for the BDT. The $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} X $ processes are normalized according to their expectations. The ratio between the data and the expected sum of signal and background contributions is shown in the lower panel. The uncertainty displayed is statistical.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distributions of the unrolled $ \rho^0 $ mass variable in the sideband (left) and signal-enriched (right) data regions. In each panel, data (black markers), is compared to the some of the expected yields from data-driven $ \mathrm{H}_\mathrm{b}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mathrm{X} $ background and simulation-based $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \tau^{+}\nu_{\!\tau} $, $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mathrm{D}_\mathrm{s}^{(\ast)+} $, and $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\rightarrow\mathrm{others} $ (orange, purple, cyan, and lime green histograms, respectively). The normalization and shape parameters for the different contributions, as well as $ \mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{J}/\psi} $, are shown for their best fit values. The ratio between the data and the expected sum of signal and background contributions is shown in the lower panel of each observable. The postfit total uncertainty in the expectation is represented by the hashed band.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distributions of the unrolled $ \rho^0 $ mass variable in the sideband (left) and signal-enriched (right) data regions. In each panel, data (black markers), is compared to the some of the expected yields from data-driven $ \mathrm{H}_\mathrm{b}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mathrm{X} $ background and simulation-based $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \tau^{+}\nu_{\!\tau} $, $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mathrm{D}_\mathrm{s}^{(\ast)+} $, and $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\rightarrow\mathrm{others} $ (orange, purple, cyan, and lime green histograms, respectively). The normalization and shape parameters for the different contributions, as well as $ \mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{J}/\psi} $, are shown for their best fit values. The ratio between the data and the expected sum of signal and background contributions is shown in the lower panel of each observable. The postfit total uncertainty in the expectation is represented by the hashed band.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distributions of the unrolled $ \rho^0 $ mass variable in the sideband (left) and signal-enriched (right) data regions. In each panel, data (black markers), is compared to the some of the expected yields from data-driven $ \mathrm{H}_\mathrm{b}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mathrm{X} $ background and simulation-based $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \tau^{+}\nu_{\!\tau} $, $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mathrm{D}_\mathrm{s}^{(\ast)+} $, and $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\rightarrow\mathrm{others} $ (orange, purple, cyan, and lime green histograms, respectively). The normalization and shape parameters for the different contributions, as well as $ \mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{J}/\psi} $, are shown for their best fit values. The ratio between the data and the expected sum of signal and background contributions is shown in the lower panel of each observable. The postfit total uncertainty in the expectation is represented by the hashed band.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Summary of the $ \mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{J}/\psi} $ measurements. The upper row corresponds to the existing LHCb [8] measurement. The second and third row, respectively, correspond to the CMS analysis using leptonic tau decays [14] and hadronic tau decay. The last row represents the combination of the CMS analyses in the leptonic and hadronic final states. The total uncertainties are indicated by the horizontal lines. The SM value is shown as a red perpendicular line.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
List of systematic uncertainties. The first category is for the shape and the second category is for the normalization, denoted as ``shape" and ``norm.", respectively, in the table. The presence of a check mark (\checkmark) represents nuisance parameters that are correlated among the ones that are shown in that row. The empty column denotes no corresponding nuisance parameters being assigned. The DD stands for data driven.
Summary
A measurement of the ratio of the branching fractions $ \mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{J}/\psi} = \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \tau^{+}\nu_{\!\tau}) / \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mu^{+}\nu_{\!\mu}) $ is described. For the numerator, the analysis targets final states with hadronically decaying $ \tau $ lepton into $ \tau^{+}\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}(+\pi^{0})\nu_{\!\tau} $. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ and collected at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV by the CMS experiment during the LHC Run 2. The ratio is measured to be $ \mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{J}/\psi} = 1.04 _{-0.44}^{+0.50} $. This measurement is combined with another that considers the leptonic decay of the tau lepton [14] to result in a measured $ \mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{J}/\psi} $ value of 0.49 $ \pm $ 0.25 (stat) $ \pm $ 0.09 (syst), which is consistent with the SM prediction of 0.258 $ \pm $ 0.004 within 1 $ \sigma $ standard deviation.
References
1 ATLAS Collaboration The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider JINST 3 (2008) S08003
2 CMS Collaboration The CMS Experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
3 LHC LHC Machine JINST 3 (2008) S08001
4 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
5 CMS Collaboration Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
6 CMS Collaboration Evidence for associated production of a Higgs boson with a top quark pair in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying $ \tau $ leptons at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 08 (2018) 066 CMS-HIG-17-018
1803.05485
7 CMS Collaboration Observation of Higgs boson decay to bottom quarks PRL 121 (2018) 121801 CMS-HIG-18-016
1808.08242
8 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \tau^{+}\nu_{\!\tau}) $/$ \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \mu^{+}\nu_{\!\mu}) $ PRL 120 (2018) 121801 1711.05623
9 LATTICE-HPQCD Collaboration $ \mathcal{R}({\mathrm{J}/\psi} ) $ and $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+}\to{\mathrm{J}/\psi} \ell^-\overline{\nu}_\ell $ lepton flavor universality violating observables from lattice QCD PRL 125 (2020) 222003 2007.06956
10 A. Y. Anisimov, I. M. Narodetsky, C. Semay, and B. Silvestre-Brac The $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+} $ meson lifetime in the light front constituent quark model PLB 452 (1999) 129 hep-ph/9812514
11 V. V. Kiselev Exclusive decays and lifetime of $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+} $ meson in QCD sum rules hep-ph/0211021
12 M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner, and P. Santorelli Exclusive semileptonic and nonleptonic decays of the $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+} $ meson PRD 73 (2006) 054024 hep-ph/0602050
13 E. Hernandez, J. Nieves, and J. M. Verde-Velasco Study of exclusive semileptonic and non-leptonic decays of $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{-} $ in a nonrelativistic quark model PRD 74 (2006) 074008 hep-ph/0607150
14 CMS Collaboration Test of lepton flavor universality in semileptonic B$ ^+_\text{c} $ meson decays in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV CMS-BPH-22-012
2408.00678
15 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2017 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004
16 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2018 data-taking period at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2018
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-001
CMS-PAS-LUM-18-001
17 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
18 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
19 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
20 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
21 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
22 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
23 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
24 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
25 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
26 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
27 C. Chang, C. Driouchi, P. Eerola, and X. Wu BCVEGPY: an event generator for hadronic production of the $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+} $ meson Comput. Phys. Communication 159 (2004) 33
28 J. Chang, C Wang and X. Wu BCVEGPY2.0: An upgraded version of the generator BCVEGPY with the addition of hadroproduction of the P-wave $ \mathrm{B}_{c}^{+} $ states Comput. Phys. Communication 174 (2006) 11
29 D. J. Lange The EvtGen particle decay simulation package NIM A 462 (2001) 152
30 T. Sjöstrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
31 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of Particle Physics PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01
32 T. D. Cohen, H. Lamm, and R. F. Lebed Precision Model-Independent Bounds from Global Analysis of $ \mathrm{b}\to\mathrm{c}\ell\nu $ Form Factors PRD 100 (2019) 094503 1909.10691
33 F. U. Bernlochner et al. Das ist der HAMMER: Consistent new physics interpretations of semileptonic decays EPJC 80 (2020) 883 2002.00020
34 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
35 HFLAV Collaboration Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and $\tau$-lepton properties as of 2021 PRD 107 (2023) 052008 2206.07501
36 T. Chen and C. Guestrin XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System 1603.02754
37 CMS Collaboration The CMS Statistical Analysis and Combination Tool: COMBINE CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
38 CMS Collaboration Tracking POG results for pion efficiency with the \\$ \mathrm{D}^{*} $ meson using data from 2016 and 2017 CMS Detector Performance Report CMS-DP-2018-050, 2018
CDS
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN