CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-B2G-17-017
Search for resonant $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A search for a heavy resonance decaying into top quark and antiquark ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) pairs is performed using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV. The search uses the full data set collected with the CMS detector in 2016, which corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 36 fb$^{-1}$. The analysis is split into three exclusive final states and uses reconstruction techniques that are optimized for top quarks with high Lorentz boosts, which requires the use of nonisolated leptons and jet substructure techniques. No significant excess of events relative to the expected yield from standard model processes is observed. Upper limits on the production cross section of heavy resonances decaying to $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ are calculated. Limits are derived for a leptophobic topcolor Z' resonance with widths of 1%, 10%, and 30% relative to the mass of the resonance. Additional exclusion limits are set for a Kaluza-Klein (KK) excitation of the gluon in the Randall-Sundrum model and a model where a narrow Z' resonance is exclusively produced in association with jets. To date, these are the most stringent limits on a $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ resonance.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The invariant mass distributions for 4 different signal models at 3 (left) and 5 (right) TeV.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The invariant mass distributions for 4 different signal models at 3 (left) and 5 (right) TeV.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The invariant mass distributions for 4 different signal models at 3 (left) and 5 (right) TeV.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distributions of $\Delta R_{\text {sum}}$ before the fit to data in $\mu \mu $ (left), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle) and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (right) events. The hashed band on the simulation represents the statistical and pre-fit systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distributions of $\Delta R_{\text {sum}}$ before the fit to data in $\mu \mu $ (left), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle) and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (right) events. The hashed band on the simulation represents the statistical and pre-fit systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distributions of $\Delta R_{\text {sum}}$ before the fit to data in $\mu \mu $ (left), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle) and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (right) events. The hashed band on the simulation represents the statistical and pre-fit systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Distributions of $\Delta R_{\text {sum}}$ before the fit to data in $\mu \mu $ (left), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle) and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (right) events. The hashed band on the simulation represents the statistical and pre-fit systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 3:
W+jets BDT distributions in the muon (left) and electron (right) single lepton channel. The signal region is defined as events with $ {{\mathrm {W}}}\text {+jets BDT} \ge 0.5$. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
W+jets BDT distributions in the muon (left) and electron (right) single lepton channel. The signal region is defined as events with $ {{\mathrm {W}}}\text {+jets BDT} \ge 0.5$. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
W+jets BDT distributions in the muon (left) and electron (right) single lepton channel. The signal region is defined as events with $ {{\mathrm {W}}}\text {+jets BDT} \ge 0.5$. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Dijet rapidity difference for events passing the fully hadronic event selection: (left) $\Delta $Y (inclusive in $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $), (right) $\Delta $Y $({M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} > $ 2 TeV). The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Dijet rapidity difference for events passing the fully hadronic event selection: (left) $\Delta $Y (inclusive in $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $), (right) $\Delta $Y $({M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} > $ 2 TeV). The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Dijet rapidity difference for events passing the fully hadronic event selection: (left) $\Delta $Y (inclusive in $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $), (right) $\Delta $Y $({M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} > $ 2 TeV). The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Distributions of the $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ variable in the background-enriched control sample for $\mu \mu $ (left), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle) and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (right) sub-channels. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distributions of the $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ variable in the background-enriched control sample for $\mu \mu $ (left), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle) and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (right) sub-channels. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distributions of the $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ variable in the background-enriched control sample for $\mu \mu $ (left), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle) and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (right) sub-channels. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Distributions of the $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ variable in the background-enriched control sample for $\mu \mu $ (left), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle) and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (right) sub-channels. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Distributions of the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ and $M_{\text {SD}}$ for the W+jets background in the muon (left) and electron (right) channels. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Distributions of the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ and $M_{\text {SD}}$ for the W+jets background in the muon (left) and electron (right) channels. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Distributions of the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ and $M_{\text {SD}}$ for the W+jets background in the muon (left) and electron (right) channels. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
Distributions of the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ and $M_{\text {SD}}$ for the W+jets background in the muon (left) and electron (right) channels. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
Distributions of the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ and $M_{\text {SD}}$ for the W+jets background in the muon (left) and electron (right) channels. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 7:
t-tagging mistag rate as measured with an anti-tag and probe procedure separately for each b-tagged category.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Distributions of $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ for the $\mu \mu $ (top), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle), and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (bottom) signal regions in the boosted (left) and non-boosted (right) regions. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
Distributions of $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ for the $\mu \mu $ (top), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle), and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (bottom) signal regions in the boosted (left) and non-boosted (right) regions. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
Distributions of $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ for the $\mu \mu $ (top), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle), and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (bottom) signal regions in the boosted (left) and non-boosted (right) regions. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
Distributions of $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ for the $\mu \mu $ (top), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle), and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (bottom) signal regions in the boosted (left) and non-boosted (right) regions. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-d:
Distributions of $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ for the $\mu \mu $ (top), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle), and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (bottom) signal regions in the boosted (left) and non-boosted (right) regions. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-e:
Distributions of $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ for the $\mu \mu $ (top), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle), and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (bottom) signal regions in the boosted (left) and non-boosted (right) regions. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-f:
Distributions of $ {S_{\text {T}}} $ for the $\mu \mu $ (top), $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}$ (middle), and $ {\mathrm {e}}\mu $ (bottom) signal regions in the boosted (left) and non-boosted (right) regions. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel signal regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories with (top) and without (bottom) t-tagging. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel signal regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories with (top) and without (bottom) t-tagging. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel signal regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories with (top) and without (bottom) t-tagging. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9-c:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel signal regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories with (top) and without (bottom) t-tagging. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9-d:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel signal regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories with (top) and without (bottom) t-tagging. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel control regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories that are light (top) and heavy (bottom) flavor enriched. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel control regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories that are light (top) and heavy (bottom) flavor enriched. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel control regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories that are light (top) and heavy (bottom) flavor enriched. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 10-c:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel control regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories that are light (top) and heavy (bottom) flavor enriched. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 10-d:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the single lepton channel control regions for the muon (left) and electron (right) categories that are light (top) and heavy (bottom) flavor enriched. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the fully hadronic channel signal region categories, used to extract the final results. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the fully hadronic channel signal region categories, used to extract the final results. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the fully hadronic channel signal region categories, used to extract the final results. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11-c:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the fully hadronic channel signal region categories, used to extract the final results. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11-d:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the fully hadronic channel signal region categories, used to extract the final results. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11-e:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the fully hadronic channel signal region categories, used to extract the final results. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11-f:
Distributions of $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ for the fully hadronic channel signal region categories, used to extract the final results. The hashed band on the simulation represents the post-fit uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 12:
Comparison of sensitivities for each analysis channel contributing to the combination. The expected limits are shown for each channel in the colored lines, while the combination result is shown in the black line. These results are shown specifically for the $ {g_{\text {KK}}} $ signal hypothesis as this model has characteristics that are common to many $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} $ resonance searches.

png pdf
Figure 13:
Observed and expected limits for each of the four signal hypotheses considered in this analysis.

png pdf
Figure 13-a:
Observed and expected limits for each of the four signal hypotheses considered in this analysis.

png pdf
Figure 13-b:
Observed and expected limits for each of the four signal hypotheses considered in this analysis.

png pdf
Figure 13-c:
Observed and expected limits for each of the four signal hypotheses considered in this analysis.

png pdf
Figure 13-d:
Observed and expected limits for each of the four signal hypotheses considered in this analysis.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Sources of systematic uncertainty that affect the $ {M_{{{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}}}} $ distribution in each analysis channel. For uncertainty sources that apply to multiple channels, the corresponding nuisance parameter is fully correlated across these channels if the check symbol appears in the same row of the table. For normalization uncertainties, the size of the effect on the prior distribution is shown. Shape uncertainties have pirors of one standard deviation (s.d.), and the dependence on kinematic quantities is shown.

png pdf
Table 2:
Limits on the product of the resonance production cross section times branching fraction, for the narrow (1%) width Z' boson resonance hypothesis.

png pdf
Table 3:
Limits on the product of the resonance production cross section times branching fraction, for the wide (10%) width Z' boson resonance hypothesis.

png pdf
Table 4:
Limits on the product of the resonance production cross section times branching fraction, for the extra-wide (30%) width Z' boson resonance hypothesis.

png pdf
Table 5:
Limits on the product of the resonance production cross section times branching fraction, for the $ {g_{\text {KK}}} $ gluon resonance hypothesis.
Summary
A search for a generic massive $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ resonance has been presented. The analysis was performed on 36 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the CMS experiment in 2016 at the LHC with a $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV. The analysis focused on searches for $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ resonances above 2 TeV, where the decay products of the top quark have become collimated due to a large Lorentz boost. The analysis performs an in-situ measurement of the analysis backgrounds and the t-tagging efficiency. The measure data are consistent with the background-only hypothesis, and no evidence for a massive $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ resonance has been found. Since no signal was observed, limits at 95% CL are calculated for the production cross-section for a spin-1 resonance decaying to $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ pairs with a variety of decay widths.

Limits are calculated for two benchmark BSM processes that decay to $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ pairs. The topcolor Z' boson with relative widths ($\Gamma/M$) of 1%, 10%, and 30% are excluded in the mass ranges 0.5-3.8, 0.5-5.0, and 0.5-5.0 TeV, respectively. KK excitations of the gluon in the Randall-Sundrum scenario are excluded between 0.5-4.55 TeV. This is the first search by CMS at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV for $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ resonances that combines all three decay topologies of the $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ system: dilepton, single lepton, and all hadronic.

The sensitivity of the analysis exceeds previous searches at $\sqrt{s} = $ 8 and 13 TeV, particularly at high $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ invariant mass. The absolution cross-section limits are 10-40% better, for $ {M_{\mathrm{t\bar{t}}}} $ above 2 TeV, than the previous result released by CMS scaled to 36 fb$^{-1}$. Previous measurements excluded the ${g_{\text{KK}}}$ up to 3.3 TeV and the topcolor Z' up to 2.5, 3.9, and 4.0 TeV for relative widths of 1%, 10%, and 30%, respectively. The presented analysis improves upon those limits, extending the ${g_{\text{KK}}}$ exclusion to 4.55 TeV and the Z' exclusions to 3.8, 5.0, and 5.0 TeV. These are the most stringent limits on the ${g_{\text{KK}}}$ and the topcolor Z' to date.
References
1 CDF Collaboration Observation of top quark production in $ \bar{p}p $ collisions PRL 74 (1995) 2626 hep-ex/9503002
2 D0 Collaboration Observation of the top quark PRL 74 (1995) 2632 hep-ex/9503003
3 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
4 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
5 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 06 (2013) 081 CMS-HIG-12-036
1303.4571
6 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Higgs boson mass from the $ H\rightarrow \gamma\gamma $ and $ H \rightarrow ZZ^{*} \rightarrow 4\ell $ channels with the ATLAS detector using 25 fb$ ^{-1} $ of pp collision data PRD 90 (2014) 052004 1406.3827
7 CMS Collaboration Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and tests of compatibility of its couplings with the standard model predictions using proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 212 CMS-HIG-14-009
1412.8662
8 ATLAS, CMS Collaboration Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in pp Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments PRL 114 (2015) 191803 1503.07589
9 J. L. Rosner Prominent decay modes of a leptophobic Z' PLB 387 (1996) 113 hep-ph/9607207
10 K. R. Lynch, S. Mrenna, M. Narain, and E. H. Simmons Finding $ Z' $ bosons coupled preferentially to the third family at CERN LEP and the Fermilab Tevatron PRD 63 (2001) 035006 hep-ph/0007286
11 M. Carena, A. Daleo, B. A. Dobrescu, and T. M. P. Tait $ Z' $ gauge bosons at the Fermilab Tevatron PRD 70 (2004) 093009 hep-ph/0408098
12 D. Dicus, A. Stange, and S. Willenbrock Higgs decay to top quarks at hadron colliders PLB 333 (1994) 126 hep-ph/9404359
13 P. H. Frampton and S. L. Glashow Chiral color: An alternative to the standard model PLB 190 (1987) 157
14 D. Choudhurya, R. M. Godbole, R. K. Singh, and K. Wagh Top production at the Tevatron/LHC and nonstandard, strongly interacting spin one particles PLB 657 (2007) 69 0810.3635
15 C. T. Hill Topcolor: Top quark condensation in a gauge extension of the standard model PLB 266 (1991) 419
16 C. T. Hill and S. J. Parke Top production: Sensitivity to new physics PRD 49 (1994) 4454 hep-ph/9312324
17 C. T. Hill Topcolor assisted technicolor PLB 345 (1995) 483 hep-ph/9911288
18 R. M. Harris and S. Jain Cross sections for leptophobic topcolor Z' decaying to top-antitop EPJC 72 (2012) 2072 1112.4928
19 L. Randall and R. Sundrum A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension PRL 83 (1999) 3370 hep-ph/9905221
20 K. Agashe et al. LHC signals from warped extra dimensions PRD 77 (2008) 015003 hep-ph/0612015
21 H. Davoudiasl, J. L. Hewett, and T. G. Rizzo Phenomenology of the Randall-Sundrum Gauge Hierarchy Model PRL 84 (2000) 2080 hep-ph/9909255
22 CDF Collaboration Limits on the production of narrow $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ resonances in $ \text{p}\bar{\text{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 77 (2008) 051102 0710.5335
23 CDF Collaboration Search for resonant $ t\bar{t} $ production in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRL 100 (2008) 231801 0709.0705
24 CDF Collaboration A search for resonant production of $ t\bar{t} $ pairs in 4.8$ fb$^{-1} of integrated luminosity of $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 84 (2011) 072004 1107.5063
25 D0 Collaboration Search for a narrow $ t\bar{t} $ resonance in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 85 (2012) 051101 1111.1271
26 CDF Collaboration Search for resonant production of $ t\bar{t} $ decaying to jets in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 84 (2011) 072003 1108.4755
27 D0 Collaboration Search for $ t\bar{t} $ resonances in the lepton plus jets final state in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PLB 668 (2008) 98 0804.3664
28 CMS Collaboration Search for anomalous $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ production in the highly-boosted all-hadronic final state JHEP 09 (2012) 029 CMS-EXO-11-006
1204.2488
29 ATLAS Collaboration A search for $ t\overline{t} $ resonances in lepton+jets events with highly boosted top quarks collected in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ ~7~TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2012) 041 1207.2409
30 ATLAS Collaboration Search for $ t\overline{t} $ resonances in the lepton plus jets final state with atlas using 4.7~fb$ ^{-1} $ of $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7~TeV PRD 88 (2013) 012004 1305.2756
31 CMS Collaboration Search for resonant $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ production in lepton+jets events in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 12 (2012) 015 CMS-TOP-12-017
1209.4397
32 CMS Collaboration Search for $ \mathrm{Z'} $ resonances decaying to $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ in dilepton+jets final states in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRD 87 (2013) 072002 CMS-TOP-11-010
1211.3338
33 CMS Collaboration Searches for new physics using the $ \text{t}\bar{\text{t}} $ invariant mass distribution in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8~TeV PRL 111 (2013) 211804 CMS-B2G-13-001
1309.2030
34 ATLAS Collaboration Search for heavy particles decaying into top-quark pairs using lepton-plus-jets events in proton--proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector Submitted to: EPJ(2018) 1804.10823
35 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
36 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
37 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
38 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
39 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
40 CMS Collaboration Performance of Electron Reconstruction and Selection with the CMS Detector in Proton-Proton Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
41 CMS Collaboration Energy Calibration and Resolution of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter in $ pp $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 8 (2013) P09009 CMS-EGM-11-001
1306.2016
42 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
43 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The catchment area of jets JHEP 04 (2008) 005 0802.1188
44 CMS Collaboration Top Tagging with New Approaches CMS-PAS-JME-15-002 CMS-PAS-JME-15-002
45 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
46 CMS Collaboration Jet Performance in pp Collisions at 7 TeV CMS-PAS-JME-10-003
47 CMS Collaboration Missing transverse energy performance of the CMS detector JINST 6 (2011) P09001 CMS-JME-10-009
1106.5048
48 CMS Collaboration A Cambridge-Aachen (C-A) Based Jet Algorithm For Boosted Top-Jet Tagging CDS
49 CMS Collaboration Boosted Top Jet Tagging at CMS CMS-PAS-JME-13-007 CMS-PAS-JME-13-007
50 D. E. Kaplan, K. Rehermann, M. D. Schwartz, and B. Tweedie Top Tagging: A Method for Identifying Boosted Hadronically Decaying Top Quarks PRL 101 (2008) 142001 0806.0848
51 D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran Pileup Per Particle Identification JHEP 10 (2014) 059 1407.6013
52 A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler Soft Drop JHEP 05 (2014) 146 1402.2657
53 J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg Identifying boosted objects with $ N $-subjettiness JHEP 03 (2011) 015 1011.2268
54 J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg Maximizing boosted top identification by minimizing $ N $-subjettiness JHEP 02 (2012) 093 1108.2701
55 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
56 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
57 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
58 S. Ask et al. Identifying the colour of TeV-scale resonances JHEP 01 (2012) 018 1108.2396
59 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
60 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
61 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
62 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s- and t-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
63 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
64 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
65 GEANT4 Collaboration $ GEANT4--a $ simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
66 M. Hildreth, V. N. Ivanchenko, D. J. Lange, and M. J. Kortelainen CMS Full Simulation for Run-2 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 664 (2015) 072022
67 B. P. Roe et al. Boosted decision trees, an alternative to artificial neural networks NIMA 543 (2005) 577 physics/0408124
68 A. Hocker et al. TMVA - Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis PoS ACAT (2007) 040 physics/0703039
69 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
70 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
71 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the integrated and differential $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ production cross sections for high-$ p_t $ top quarks in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 94 (2016) 072002 CMS-TOP-14-012
1605.00116
72 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross-section of highly boosted top quarks as a function of their transverse momentum in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV proton-proton collisions using the ATLAS detector PRD 93 (2016) 032009 1510.03818
73 T. Muller, J. Ott, and J. Wagner-Kuhr theta - a framework for template-based modeling and inference link
74 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples CPC 77 (1993) 219
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN