CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SMP-21-009
Measurement of the double-differential inclusive jet cross section in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 5.02 TeV
Abstract: The inclusive jet cross section is differentially measured in bins of jet transverse momentum $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and rapidity $y$. The measurement is performed using proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} = $ 5.02 TeV, recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 27.4 pb$^{-1}$. The jets are reconstructed with the anti-$k_{\mathrm{T}}$ algorithm using a distance parameter of $R = $ 0.4, within the rapidity interval $|y| < $ 2, across the kinematic range 0.06 $ < p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 1 TeV. The jet cross section is unfolded from detector-level to particle-level using the measured jet response and resolution. The measurement is compared with perturbative QCD predictions, calculated at both next-to-leading order (NLO) and next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO). The prediction is corrected for nonperturbative effects, and presented for a variety of parton distribution functions and choices of the renormalization and factorization scale $\mu$. The NNLO prediction reproduces the measured cross section better than NLO does, and the NNLO prediction is also significantly less dependent on the choice of $\mu$.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The merged detector-level spectrum, with colors indicating which part of the spectrum comes from which trigger. The vertical axis is the number of observed jets divided by the product of effective luminosity and bin width.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distribution at detector-level of the inclusive jet cross section, for the four rapidity bins, is shown for the data (points) and the PYTHIA 8 prediction (histogram) normalized to the total cross section of the data. The error bars show the statistical uncertainties on the data

png pdf
Figure 3:
The nonperturbative corrections to the fixed-order QCD calculation of inclusive-jet cross section, as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, for the most central rapidity bin. Dashed lines show the prediction of corrections using HERWIG 7 (lower line) and PYTHIA 8 (higher line). The central solid line shows the average NP correction used in this analysis, with an uncertainty defined by the extreme predictions. The NP corrections are similar in shape and value for the other rapidity bins.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The covariance matrices of the observed detector-level jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for the four rapidity bin. The color scale reports the square of the effective number of jets in data.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The covariance matrices of the observed detector-level jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for the four rapidity bin. The color scale reports the square of the effective number of jets in data.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The covariance matrices of the observed detector-level jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for the four rapidity bin. The color scale reports the square of the effective number of jets in data.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
The covariance matrices of the observed detector-level jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for the four rapidity bin. The color scale reports the square of the effective number of jets in data.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
The covariance matrices of the observed detector-level jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for the four rapidity bin. The color scale reports the square of the effective number of jets in data.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The response matrices, the number of jets in a bin of detector-level pt that originate from jets in a bin of particle-level ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, for the four rapidity bins. The color scale reports the square of the number of toy-MC jets.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The response matrices, the number of jets in a bin of detector-level pt that originate from jets in a bin of particle-level ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, for the four rapidity bins. The color scale reports the square of the number of toy-MC jets.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The response matrices, the number of jets in a bin of detector-level pt that originate from jets in a bin of particle-level ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, for the four rapidity bins. The color scale reports the square of the number of toy-MC jets.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
The response matrices, the number of jets in a bin of detector-level pt that originate from jets in a bin of particle-level ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, for the four rapidity bins. The color scale reports the square of the number of toy-MC jets.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
The response matrices, the number of jets in a bin of detector-level pt that originate from jets in a bin of particle-level ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$, for the four rapidity bins. The color scale reports the square of the number of toy-MC jets.

png pdf
Figure 6:
JEC, JER, and total systematic uncertainties in unfolded cross sections as a function of transverse momentum and rapidity. The total systematic uncertainty includes also the luminosity, jet identification and trigger turn-on uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 7:
The unfolded measured particle-level inclusive jet cross sections as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for the four rapidity regions, overlaid with the NLO perturbative QCD prediction, using the CT14nlo PDF set, with $\mu _R=\mu _F=H_{\mathrm{T}}$, and corrected for nonperturbative effects. The yellow band shows the experimental systematic uncertainty and the red band shows the theoretical systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Ratio of cross sections to the NLO theoretical prediction, using the CT14nlo PDF set, with $\mu = p_{\mathrm{T}}$. The yellow band shows the total experimental uncertainty, the hashed red band shows the total theoretical uncertainty, and individual sources of theoretical uncertainty are shown with lines.

png pdf
Figure 9:
Ratio of cross sections to the NLO theoretical prediction, using the CT14nlo PDF set, with $\mu = H_{\mathrm{T}}$. The yellow band shows the total experimental uncertainty, the hashed red band shows the total theoretical uncertainty, and individual sources of theoretical uncertainty are shown with lines.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Ratio of cross sections to the NNLO theoretical prediction, using the CT14nnlo PDF set, with $\mu = H_{\mathrm{T}}$. The yellow band shows the total experimental uncertainty, the hashed red band shows the total theoretical uncertainty, and individual sources of theoretical uncertainty are shown with lines.

png pdf
Figure 11:
Ratio of cross sections to the NNLO theoretical prediction, using the NNPDF31nnlo PDF set, with $\alpha _S(M_{\mathrm{Z}}) = $0.120 and $\mu = H_{\mathrm{T}}$. The yellow band shows the total experimental uncertainty, the hashed red band shows the total theoretical uncertainty, and individual sources of theoretical uncertainty are shown with lines.

png pdf
Figure 12:
The effect of $\alpha _S$ variation. The NNLO theoretical cross section predictions using the NNPDF31nnlo PDF with $\mu =H_{\mathrm{T}}$, calculated for different choices of $\alpha _S$, are divided by the benchmark NNLO prediction for $\alpha _S = $0.118 and the same choice of PDF set and renormalization and factorization scales. Also shown is the experimental unfolded measurement divided by the same benchmark prediction.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ binning for the detector-level spectra (all rapidities) and the particle-level spectra.
Summary
The measurement of the double-differential inclusive jet cross section in proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV has been presented. The measurements agree well with standard model predictions. The best agreement is found when the prediction is a NNLO QCD calculation with the renormalization and factorization scale choice $\mu = \mu_R = \mu_F = H_{\mathrm{T}}$, and using the NNPDF31nnlo PDF set with $\alpha_S(M_{\mathrm{Z}})=$ 0.120. Going from the NLO to NNLO prediction reduces the scale systematic uncertainty at high ${p_{\mathrm{T}}}$, but increases it at low ${p_{\mathrm{T}}}$. The scale systematic uncertainty also increases when going from $\mu = {p_{\mathrm{T}}}$ to $\mu = H_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the NLO case. The effect of changing the scale is not very large for the NNLO calculation, and the scale systematic decreases at low-${p_{\mathrm{T}}}$ going from $\mu = {p_{\mathrm{T}}}$ to $\mu = H_{\mathrm{T}}$. The uncertainty on the cross section due to PDFs is significantly reduced by choosing the NNPDF31nnlo family of PDF sets. For this PDF set, the choice of strong coupling constant $\alpha_S(M_{\mathrm{Z}})=$ 0.120 gives a cross section that is closer to the experimental results, compared to a benchmark of $\alpha_S(M_{\mathrm{Z}})=$ 0.118. The demonstrated sensitivity of the comparisons to the different values of $\alpha_S$ could lead to a measurement of the strong coupling constant based on these results.
References
1 AFS Collaboration The jet cross section in $ pp $ interactions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 45 GeV and its $ \sqrt{s} $ dependence PLB 123 (1983) 133
2 AFS Collaboration Direct evidence for the emergence of jets in events triggered on large transverse energy in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 63 {GeV} $ PLB 118 (1982) 185
3 UA1 Collaboration Hadronic jet production at the CERN proton-antiproton collider PLB 132 (1983) 214
4 UA2 Collaboration Measurement of the $ s $ dependence of jet production at the CERN $ p\bar{p} $ collider PLB 160 (1985) 349
5 UA1 Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section at the CERN $ p\bar{p} $ collider PLB 172 (1986) 461
6 UA2 Collaboration Inclusive jet cross-section and a search for quark compositeness at the CERN collider PLB 257 (1991) 232
7 UA1 Collaboration Production of low transverse energy clusters in collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 0.2-0.9 TeV and their interpretation in terms of QCD jets NPB 309 (1988) 405
8 CDF Collaboration Comparison of jet production in $ \bar{p}p $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 546 GeV and 1800 GeV PRL 70 (1993) 1376
9 A. A. Bhatti Inclusive jet production at $\sqrt{s} = $ 630 GeV and a test of scaling at CDF 1996 Annual Divisional Meeting (DPF96) of the Division of Particles and Fields of the American Physical Society, Minnesota, MN, August 10-15
10 CDF Collaboration Inclusive jet cross section in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.8 TeV PRL 77 (1996) 438 hep-ex/9601008
11 D0 Collaboration Inclusive jet production in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions PRL 86 (2001) 1707 hep-ex/0011036
12 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section using the using the $ k_t $ algorithm in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRL 96 (2006) 122001 hep-ex/0512062
13 CDF Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section using the $ k_t $ algorithm in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV with the CDF II detector PRD 75 (2007) 092006 hep-ex/0701051
14 CDF Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section at the fermilab tevatron $ p\bar{p} $ collider using a cone-based jet algorithm PRD 78 (2008) 052006 0807.2204
15 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRL 101 (2008) 062001 0802.2400
16 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 85 (2012) 052006 1110.3771
17 ALICE Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive differential jet cross section in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 2.76 TeV PLB 722 (2013) 262 1301.3475
18 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 2.76 TeV and comparison to the inclusive jet cross-section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector EPJC 73 (2013) 2509 1304.4739
19 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 2.76 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 265 CMS-SMP-14-017
1512.06212
20 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV centre-of-mass energy with the ATLAS detector EPJC 71 (2011) 1512 1009.5908
21 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRL 107 (2011) 132001 CMS-QCD-10-011
1106.0208
22 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector PRD 86 (2012) 014022 1112.6297
23 CMS Collaboration Measurements of differential jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the CMS detector PRD 87 (2013) 112002 CMS-QCD-11-004
1212.6660
24 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of inclusive jet cross sections using the anti-$ k_t $ algorithm with radius parameters $ r = $ 0.5 and 0.7 in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRD 90 (2014) 072006 CMS-SMP-13-002
1406.0324
25 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV using 4.5 fb$ ^{-1} $ of data with the ATLAS detector JHEP 02 (2015) 153 1410.8857
26 CMS Collaboration Constraints on parton distribution functions and extraction of the strong coupling constant from the inclusive jet cross section in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 288 CMS-SMP-12-028
1410.6765
27 CMS Collaboration Measurement and QCD analysis of double-differential inclusive jet cross sections in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV and ratios to 2.76 and 7 TeV JHEP 03 (2017) 156 CMS-SMP-14-001
1609.05331
28 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross-sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2017) 20 1706.03192
29 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the double-differential inclusive jet cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 76 (2016) 451 CMS-SMP-15-007
1605.04436
30 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet cross-sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 05 (2018) 195 1711.02692
31 CMS Collaboration Dependence of inclusive jet production on the anti-$ k_t $ distance parameter in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 12 (2020) 82 CMS-SMP-19-003
2005.05159
32 WA97 Collaboration Strangeness enhancement at mid-rapidity in PbPb collisions at 158 A GeV/c PLB 449 (1999) 401
33 WA97 Collaboration Transverse mass spectra of strange and multi--strange particles in PbPb collisions at 158 A GeV/ c EPJC 14 (2000) 633
34 CMS Collaboration Evidence for collectivity in pp collisions at the LHC PLB 765 (2017) 193 CMS-HIN-16-010
1606.06198
35 D. d'Enterria Jet quenching in Springer Materials - The Landolt-B\"ornstein Database, R. Stock, ed., volume 23: Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics, p. 99 Springer 0902.2011
36 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the splitting function in $ pp $ and pb-pb collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=5.02\text{}\text{}\mathrm{TeV} $ PRL 120 (2018) 142302 CMS-HIN-16-006
1708.09429
37 CMS Collaboration Observation of medium-induced modifications of jet fragmentation in pb-pb collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02\text{}\text{}\mathrm{TeV} $ using isolated photon-tagged jets PRL 121 (2018) 242301 CMS-HIN-16-014
1801.04895
38 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a centrality-dependent dijet asymmetry in lead-lead collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76\text{}\text{}\mathrm{TeV} $ with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PRL 105 (2010) 252303 1011.6182
39 CMS Collaboration Jet momentum dependence of jet quenching in PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{{s}_{\mathit{\text{NN}}}}= $ 2.76 TeV PLB 712 (2012) 176 CMS-HIN-11-013
1202.5022
40 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
41 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
42 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) P10017 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
43 CMS Collaboration The CMS high level trigger EPJC 46 (2006) 605 1403.1500
44 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
45 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) 10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
46 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
47 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
48 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002 1107.4277
49 T. Sj$\ddoto$strand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
50 B. Andersson The Lund model Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. NP Cosmol. 7 (1998) 1
51 NNPDF Collaboration A determination of parton distributions with faithful uncertainty estimation NPB 809 (2009) 1 0808.1231
52 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurement EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
53 CMS Collaboration Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
54 CMS Collaboration HERWIG 7.0/HERWIG++ 3.0 release note EPJC 76 (2016) 196 1512.01178
55 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
56 UA1 Collaboration A QCD model for jet fragmentation including soft gluon interference NPB 238 (1984) 492
57 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a set of HERWIG 7 tunes from CMS underlying-event measurements CMS-PAS-GEN-19-001
58 S. Agostinelli et al. Geant4 -- a simulation toolkit Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 506 (2003) 250
59 Z. Nagy Three jet cross-sections in hadron hadron collisions at next-to-leading order PRL 88 (2002) 122003 hep-ph/0110315
60 Z. Nagy Next-to-leading order calculation of three-jet observables in hadron hadron collisions PRD 68 (2003) 094002 hep-ph/0307268
61 D. Britzger, K. Rabbertz, F. Stober, and M. Wobisch New features in version 2 of the fastNLO project in Proceedings, XX. International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects (DIS 2012), p. 217 Bonn, Germany, March 26-30 1208.3641
62 J. Currie et al. Jet cross sections and transverse momentum distributions with NNLOJET in Proceedings of Science, Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory 2018 hep-ph/1801.06415
63 J. Currie, E. W. N. Glover, and J. Pires Next-to-next-to leading order QCD predictions for single jet inclusive production at the LHC PRL 118 (2017) 072002 hep-ph/1611.01460
64 J. Currie et al. Infrared sensitivity of single jet inclusive production at hadron colliders JHEP 10 (2018) 155 hep-ph/1807.03692
65 D. Britzger et al. Calculations for deep inelastic scattering using fast interpolation grid techniques at NNLO in QCD and the extraction of $ \alpha_s $ from HERA data EPJC 79 (2019) 845 hep-ph/1906.05303
66 S. Dulat et al. New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics PRD 93 (2016) 033006 1506.07443
67 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
68 A. Buckley et al. LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era EPJC 75 (2015) 132 1412.7420
69 CMS Collaboration First measurement of large area jet transverse momentum spectra in heavy-ion collisions JHEP 05 (2021) 284 CMS-HIN-18-014
2102.13080
70 S. Schmitt TUnfold: an algorithm for correcting migration effects in high energy physics JINST 7 (2012) T10003 1205.6201
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN