CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-SMP-14-017 ; CERN-PH-EP-2015-299
Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 2.76 TeV
Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 265
Abstract: The double-differential inclusive jet cross section is measured as a function of jet transverse momentum $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and absolute rapidity $| y |$, using proton-proton collision data collected with the CMS experiment at the LHC, at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = $ 2.76 TeV and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.43 pb$^{-1}$. Jets are reconstructed within the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ range of 74 to 592 GeV and the rapidity range $| y |< $ 3.0 . The reconstructed jet spectrum is corrected for detector resolution. The measurements are compared to the theoretical prediction at next-to-leading-order QCD using different sets of parton distribution functions. This inclusive cross section measurement explores a new kinematic region and is consistent with QCD predictions.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The inclusive jet production cross section, measured at $\sqrt {s}= $ 2.76 TeV, shown as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in six $ {| y | }$ bins, as indicated by different symbols. The statistical (systematic) experimental uncertainties are indicated by vertical error bars (filled bands). The measurements are compared to the NLO QCD prediction using CT10 PDF set. The theoretical uncertainties are represented by hatched bands.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The ratio of the measured inclusive jet production cross section (closed symbols) at $\sqrt {s}= $ 2.76 TeV to the theoretical prediction using the CT10 PDF set is shown as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in each measured $ {| y | }$ range with the statistical (vertical error bars) and systematic (solid lines) experimental uncertainties. The total theoretical uncertainties are shown by the dash-dotted lines with the contribution from PDF uncertainties (hatched band).

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The ratio of the measured inclusive jet production cross section (closed symbols) at $\sqrt {s}= $ 2.76 TeV to the theoretical prediction using the CT10 PDF set is shown as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in each measured $ {| y | }$ range with the statistical (vertical error bars) and systematic (solid lines) experimental uncertainties. The total theoretical uncertainties are shown by the dash-dotted lines with the contribution from PDF uncertainties (hatched band).

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
The ratio of the measured inclusive jet production cross section (closed symbols) at $\sqrt {s}= $ 2.76 TeV to the theoretical prediction using the CT10 PDF set is shown as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in each measured $ {| y | }$ range with the statistical (vertical error bars) and systematic (solid lines) experimental uncertainties. The total theoretical uncertainties are shown by the dash-dotted lines with the contribution from PDF uncertainties (hatched band).

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
The ratio of the measured inclusive jet production cross section (closed symbols) at $\sqrt {s}= $ 2.76 TeV to the theoretical prediction using the CT10 PDF set is shown as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in each measured $ {| y | }$ range with the statistical (vertical error bars) and systematic (solid lines) experimental uncertainties. The total theoretical uncertainties are shown by the dash-dotted lines with the contribution from PDF uncertainties (hatched band).

png pdf
Figure 2-e:
The ratio of the measured inclusive jet production cross section (closed symbols) at $\sqrt {s}= $ 2.76 TeV to the theoretical prediction using the CT10 PDF set is shown as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in each measured $ {| y | }$ range with the statistical (vertical error bars) and systematic (solid lines) experimental uncertainties. The total theoretical uncertainties are shown by the dash-dotted lines with the contribution from PDF uncertainties (hatched band).

png pdf
Figure 2-f:
The ratio of the measured inclusive jet production cross section (closed symbols) at $\sqrt {s}= $ 2.76 TeV to the theoretical prediction using the CT10 PDF set is shown as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in each measured $ {| y | }$ range with the statistical (vertical error bars) and systematic (solid lines) experimental uncertainties. The total theoretical uncertainties are shown by the dash-dotted lines with the contribution from PDF uncertainties (hatched band).

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The same data shown in Fig. 2 are presented showing comparisons to the NLO QCD predictions using a variety of PDFs, which are denoted by different line styles. The uncertainties corresponding to the QCD predictions are not shown. For simplicity, the NP corrections needed for the various QCD predictions have been applied to the data in this figure.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The same data shown in Fig. 2 are presented showing comparisons to the NLO QCD predictions using a variety of PDFs, which are denoted by different line styles. The uncertainties corresponding to the QCD predictions are not shown. For simplicity, the NP corrections needed for the various QCD predictions have been applied to the data in this figure.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The same data shown in Fig. 2 are presented showing comparisons to the NLO QCD predictions using a variety of PDFs, which are denoted by different line styles. The uncertainties corresponding to the QCD predictions are not shown. For simplicity, the NP corrections needed for the various QCD predictions have been applied to the data in this figure.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
The same data shown in Fig. 2 are presented showing comparisons to the NLO QCD predictions using a variety of PDFs, which are denoted by different line styles. The uncertainties corresponding to the QCD predictions are not shown. For simplicity, the NP corrections needed for the various QCD predictions have been applied to the data in this figure.

png pdf
Figure 3-e:
The same data shown in Fig. 2 are presented showing comparisons to the NLO QCD predictions using a variety of PDFs, which are denoted by different line styles. The uncertainties corresponding to the QCD predictions are not shown. For simplicity, the NP corrections needed for the various QCD predictions have been applied to the data in this figure.

png pdf
Figure 3-f:
The same data shown in Fig. 2 are presented showing comparisons to the NLO QCD predictions using a variety of PDFs, which are denoted by different line styles. The uncertainties corresponding to the QCD predictions are not shown. For simplicity, the NP corrections needed for the various QCD predictions have been applied to the data in this figure.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Effective integrated luminosities and jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ ranges for triggers used in this study.

png pdf
Table 2:
The factors used to scale jet resolution determined in simulations to match the resolution observed in data.

png pdf
Table 3:
The PDF sets used for deriving cross section predictions are given with the number of active flavors ($N_\mathrm {f}$), the values and ranges of ${\alpha _\mathrm {S}(M_{\mathrm{ Z } })}$ used for the fits, and corresponding references.
Summary
A measurement of the double-differential inclusive jet cross section was presented. The data were collected by the CMS detector in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 2.76 TeV, with an integrated luminosity of 5.43 pb$^{-1}$. The measurement covers the jet kinematic ranges of 74 $ \leq p_{\mathrm{T}} < $ 592 GeV and $ | y |< $ 3.0 .

A detailed study of the experimental and theoretical uncertainties has been performed. Contributions to the experimental systematic uncertainty were evaluated from the jet energy corrections, jet energy resolution, and integrated luminosity. Jet energy corrections dominate the experimental uncertainty, followed by smaller contributions from jet energy resolution and luminosity. The theoretical uncertainty is dominated by the missing higher-order corrections that were estimated by varying the renormalization and factorization scales, and the PDF uncertainty; the contribution of nonperturbative correction uncertainty is small.

The data are corrected for detector resolution and efficiencies. The measured cross sections are compared to NLO QCD predictions obtained using different PDF sets. These cross section measurements test and confirm the predictions of QCD at $\sqrt{s}= $ 2.76 TeV and extend the kinematic range compared to previous studies.
References
1 G. Altarelli and G. Parisi Asymptotic freedom in parton language Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298
2 V. Gribov and L. Lipatov Deep inelastic ep scattering in perturbation theory Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15 (1972) 438
3 Y. L. Dokshitzer Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e$ ^+ $e$ ^- $ Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics Sov. Phys. JETP 46 (1977) 641
4 CMS Collaboration Constraints on parton distribution functions and extraction of the strong coupling constant from the inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 7 $$ TeV $ EPJC 75 (2015) 288
5 CMS Collaboration Measurements of differential jet cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the CMS detector PRD 87 (2013) 112002
6 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV using the ATLAS detector PRD 86 (2012) 014022 1112.6297
7 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=2.76 $ TeV and comparison to the inclusive jet cross section at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV using the ATLAS detector EPJC 73 (2013) 2509 1304.4739
8 ALICE Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive differential jet cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}~=~ $2.76 TeV PLB 722 (2013) 262 1301.3475
9 UA1 Collaboration Hadronic jet production at the CERN proton-antiproton collider Phy. Lett. B 132 (1983) 214
10 UA1 Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross-section at the CERN p$ \bar{\mathrm{p}} $ collider PLB 172 (1986) 461
11 UA2 Collaboration Observation of very large transverse momentum jets at the CERN p$ \bar{\mathrm{p}} $ collider PLB 118 (1982) 203
12 UA2 Collaboration Measurement of the $ \sqrt{s} $~dependence of jet production at the CERN $ \bar{\mathrm{p}} $p collider PLB 160 (1985) 349
13 CDF Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section using the k$ _\mathrm{t} $ algorithm in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 1.96 $ TeV with the CDF II detector PRD 75 (2007) 092006, , [Erratum: \DOI10.1103/PhysRevD.75.119901] hep-ex/0701051
14 CDF Collaboration Comparison of jet production in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 546 $ GeV and 1800 GeV PRL 70 (1993) 1376
15 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=1.96 $ TeV PRD 85 (2012) 052006 1110.3771
16 D0 Collaboration High-$ p_T $ jets in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 630 $ GeV and 1800 GeV PRD 64 (2001) 032003 hep-ex/0012046
17 Z. Nagy Three-jet cross sections in hadron-hadron collisions at next-to-leading order PRL 88 (2002) 122003 hep-ph/0110315
18 Z. Nagy Next-to-leading order calculation of three-jet observables in hadron-hadron collisions PRD 68 (2003) 094002 hep-ph/0307268
19 D. Britzger, K. Rabbertz, F. Stober, and M. Wobisch New features in version 2 of the fastNLO project in XX Int'l Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects, p. 217 2012 1208.3641
20 S. Dittmaier, A. Huss, and C. Speckner Weak radiative corrections to dijet production at hadron colliders JHEP 11 (2012) 095 1210.0438
21 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
22 CMS Collaboration Particle--Flow Event Reconstruction in CMS and Performance for Jets, Taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CDS
23 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the Particle-flow Event Reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
24 C. Matteo, S. Gavin, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
25 M. Cacciari, G. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
26 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) P11002
27 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 26 hep-ph/0603175
28 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
29 R. Field Early LHC Underlying Event Data - Findings and Surprises 1010.3558
30 J. Pumplin et al. New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis JHEP 07 (2002) 012 hep-ph/0201195
31 R. Field Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC 1110.5530
32 H. Lai et al. New parton distributions for collider physics PRD 82 (2010) 074024 1007.2241
33 H. Akima A New Method of Interpolation and Smooth Curve Fitting Based on Local Procedures J. ACM 17 (1970) 589
34 G. D'Agostini A multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes' theorem NIMA 362 (1995) 487
35 T. Adye Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold 1105.1160
36 L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, P. Motylinski, and R. S. Thorne Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs EPJC 75 (2015) 204 1412.3989
37 R. D. Ball et al. Parton distributions for the LHC run II JHEP 04 (2015) 40 1410.8849
38 H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Combined Measurement and QCD Analysis of the Inclusive e$ ^{\pm} $p Scattering Cross Sections at HERA JHEP 01 (2010) 109 0911.0884
39 S. Alekhin, J. Bl\"umlein, and S. Moch Parton distribution functions and benchmark cross sections at next-to-next-to-leading order PRD 86 (2012) 054009 1202.2281
40 M. B\"ahr et al. Herwig++ physics and manual EPJC 58 (2008) 639 0803.0883
41 S. Gieseke, C. R\"ohr, and A. Si\'odmok Colour reconnections in Herwig++ EPJC 72 (2012) 2225 1206.0041
42 B. Andersson The Lund model Nucl. Phys. A 461 (1987) 513
43 B. R. Webber A QCD model for jet fragmentation including soft gluon interference Nucl. Phys. B 238 (1984) 492
44 CMS Collaboration Luminosity Calibration for the 2013 Proton-Lead and Proton-Proton Data Taking CMS-PAS-LUM-13-002 CMS-PAS-LUM-13-002
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN