CMS-PAS-SMP-19-008 | ||
Observation of the electroweak production of Wγ in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV | ||
CMS Collaboration | ||
May 2020 | ||
Abstract: A measurement of the electroweak (EW) production of a W boson and a photon in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions, where the W boson decays leptonically, is presented. Events are selected by requiring one identified electron or muon, missing transverse momentum, one photon, and two jets with a large dijet mass and a large rapidity separation. The measurement is based on data collected with the CMS detector in 2016 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb−1. The observed (expected) significance for this process is 4.9 (4.6) standard deviations. After combining with previously reported CMS results based on 8 TeV data, the observed (expected) significance is 5.3 (4.8) standard deviations. This constitutes the first observation of EW Wγ production in pp collisions. The cross section measured in the fiducial region is 20.4 ± 4.5 fb and the total cross section for EW + QCD Wγ production in association with 2 jets in the same fiducial region is measured to be 108 ± 16 fb. All measurements are in good agreement with recent theory predictions. We set the most stringent limits to date on the anomalous quartic gauge coupling parameters FM,2−5 and FT,6−7. | ||
Links:
CDS record (PDF) ;
CADI line (restricted) ;
These preliminary results are superseded in this paper, PLB 811 (2020) 135988. The superseded preliminary plots can be found here. |
Figures | |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 1:
Representative diagrams for ℓνγjj production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right). |
![]() png |
Figure 1-a:
Representative diagrams for ℓνγjj production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right). |
![]() png |
Figure 1-b:
Representative diagrams for ℓνγjj production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right). |
![]() png |
Figure 1-c:
Representative diagrams for ℓνγjj production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right). |
![]() png |
Figure 1-d:
Representative diagrams for ℓνγjj production at the LHC: EW production (left), EW production with triple gauge boson coupling (middle left) and with quartic gauge boson coupling (middle right), and QCD-induced processes (right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 2:
Comparison of the photon pT distribution from data and simulation in the low-mjj control region. All events with photon pT> 193 GeV are included in the last bin. |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 3:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 3-a:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 3-b:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 3-c:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 3-d:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left), and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 4:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 4-a:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 4-b:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 4-c:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 4-d:
The 2D distributions used in the fit for the signal strength of EW+QCD Wγ+2 jets in the electron barrel (top left), electron endcap (top right), muon barrel (bottom left) and muon endcap (bottom right). |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 5:
The mWγ distribution of events satisfying the aQGC region selection, which is used to set constraints on the anomalous coupling parameters. The orange line represents a nonzero FT,0 setting. All events with mWγ> 990 GeV are included in the last bin. |
![]() png pdf |
Figure 6:
Observed 95% CL interval on the aQGC parameter FT,0. |
Tables | |
![]() png pdf |
Table 1:
Relative systematic uncertainties in the estimated signal and background yields in units of percent. The range of the uncertainty when varying mjj and mℓγ is shown for the systematic uncertainty sources. |
![]() png pdf |
Table 2:
Signal, background, and data yields after the final selection for the SM measurement. The pre-fit statistical and systematic uncertainties are added in quadrature. |
![]() png pdf |
Table 3:
Parameterized by the Wγ mass, 95% CL shape-based exclusion limits on each aQGC parameter, no form factor is applied. The unitarity bounds are also listed. All coupling parameter limits are in TeV−4, while the unitarity bounds are in TeV. |
Summary |
The production cross sections of electroweak production of Wγ in association with two jets are measured in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb−1 collected at √s= 13 TeV with the CMS detector. Events are selected by requiring exactly one identified lepton (electron or muon), a moderate missing transverse momentum, one photon, and two jets with a large rapidity separation and a large dijet mass. The observed significance is 4.9 standard deviations (σ), where a significance of 4.6 σ is expected based on the standard model. After combining with previously reported CMS results based on 8 TeV data, the observed (expected) signal significance is 5.3 (4.8) σ. This constitutes the first observation of electroweak Wγ production in pp collisions. A cross section measurement in a fiducial region is reported and is consistent with standard model predictions. Constraints are placed on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in terms of dimension-8 effective field theory operators. Results are competitive with or more stringent than previous results. |
References | ||||
1 | ATLAS Collaboration | Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC | PLB 716 (2012) 1 | 1207.7214 |
2 | CMS Collaboration | Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC | PLB 716 (2012) 30 | CMS-HIG-12-028 1207.7235 |
3 | CMS Collaboration | Measuring the properties of the Higgs boson at CMS | Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 273--275 (2016) 2466, . 37th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP) | |
4 | CMS Collaboration | Observation of electroweak production of same-sign w boson pairs in the two jet and two same-sign lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 tev | PRL 120 (2018) 081801 | CMS-SMP-17-004 1709.05822 |
5 | ATLAS Collaboration | Observation of electroweak production of a same-sign W boson pair in association with two jets in pp collisions at √s= 13 tev with the atlas detector | PRL 123 (2019) 161801 | |
6 | CMS Collaboration | Measurements of production cross sections of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 tev | Submitted to PLB | CMS-SMP-19-012 2005.01173 |
7 | ATLAS Collaboration | Studies of zγ production in association with a high-mass dijet system in pp collisions at √s= 8 tev with the atlas detector | JHEP 07 (2017) 107 | 1705.01966 |
8 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of Zγ in association with two jets and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in proton-proton collisions at √s= 8 tev | PLB 770 (2017) 380 | CMS-SMP-14-018 1702.03025 |
9 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of electroweak-induced production of Wγ with two jets in pp collisions at √s= 8 tev and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings | JHEP 06 (2017) 106 | CMS-SMP-14-011 1612.09256 |
10 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of a z boson, a photon and two jets in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 tev and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings | Accepted to JHEP | CMS-SMP-18-007 2002.09902 |
11 | CMS Collaboration | The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC | JINST 3 (2008) S08004 | CMS-00-001 |
12 | V. Khoze, M. Ryskin, W. Stirling, and P. Williams | A Z-monitor to calibrate Higgs production via vector boson fusion with rapidity gaps at the LHC | EPJC 26 (2003) 429 | hep-ph/0207365 |
13 | C. Oleari and D. Zeppenfeld | QCD corrections to electroweak ℓνjj and ℓ+ℓ−jj production | PRD 69 (2004) 093004 | hep-ph/0310156 |
14 | C. Degrande et al. | Effective field theory: A modern approach to anomalous couplings | Ann. Phys. 335 (2013) 21 | 1205.4231 |
15 | CMS Collaboration | The CMS trigger system | JINST 12 (2017) P01020 | CMS-TRG-12-001 1609.02366 |
16 | J. Alwall et al. | The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations | JHEP 07 (2014) 079 | 1405.0301 |
17 | R. Frederix and S. Frixione | Merging meets matching in MC@NLO | JHEP 12 (2012) 061 | 1209.6215 |
18 | T. Sjostrand et al. | An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 | CPC 191 (2015) 159 | 1410.3012 |
19 | S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re | A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX | JHEP 07 (2010) | 1002.2581 |
20 | P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo | Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune | EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 | 1404.5630 |
21 | CMS Collaboration | Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements | EPJC 76 (2016) 155 | CMS-GEN-14-001 1512.00815 |
22 | NNPDF Collaboration | Parton distributions for the lhc run ii | JHEP 04 (2015) 040 | 1410.8849 |
23 | GEANT4 Collaboration | GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit | NIMA 506 (2003) 250 | |
24 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp collisions at √s= 13 tev | JHEP 10 (2011) 132 | CMS-EWK-10-005 1107.4789 |
25 | CMS Collaboration | Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector | JINST 12 (2017) P10003 | CMS-PRF-14-001 1706.04965 |
26 | CMS Collaboration | Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker | JINST 9 (2014) P10009 | CMS-TRK-11-001 1405.6569 |
27 | M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez | The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm | Journal of High Energy Physics 2008 (2008), no. 04, 063 | |
28 | M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez | FastJet user manual | EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 | 1111.6097 |
29 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at √s= 8 tev | JINST 10 (2015) P06005 | CMS-EGM-13-001 1502.02701 |
30 | CMS Collaboration | Energy calibration and resolution of the cms electromagnetic calorimeter in pp collision at √s= 7 tev | JINST 8 (2013) P09009 | CMS-EGM-11-001 1306.2016 |
31 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 tev | JINST 13 (2018) P06015 | CMS-MUO-16-001 1804.04528 |
32 | M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam | Pileup subtraction using jet areas | PLB 659 (2008) 119 | 0707.1378 |
33 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at √s= 8 tev | JINST 10 (2015) P08010 | CMS-EGM-14-001 1502.02702 |
34 | CMS Collaboration | Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS | JINST 6 (2011) P11002 | CMS-JME-10-011 1107.4277 |
35 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 tev using the cms detector | JINST 14 (2019) P07004 | CMS-JME-17-001 1903.06078 |
36 | D. Rainwater, R. Szalapski, and D. Zeppenfeld | Probing color singlet exchange in Z+2-jet events at the CERN LHC | PRD 54 (1996) 6680 | hep-ph/9605444 |
37 | Particle Data Group Collaboration | Review of particle physics | PRD 98 (2018) 030001 | |
38 | CMS Collaboration | Search for a heavy resonance decaying to a pair of vector bosons in the lepton plus merged jet final state at √s= 13 tev | JHEP 05 (2018) 088 | CMS-B2G-16-029 1802.09407 |
39 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of Wγ and Zγ production in pp collisions at √s= 7 tev | PLB 701 (2011) 535 | CMS-EWK-10-008 1105.2758 |
40 | CMS Collaboration | CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period | CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 | CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 |
41 | M. Botje et al. | The PDF4LHC working group interim recommendations | 2011 | |
42 | S. Alekhin et al. | The PDF4LHC working group interim report | 2011 | |
43 | J. Butterworth et al. | PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC run II | JPG 43 (2016) 023001 | 1510.03865 |
44 | G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells | Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics | EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 | 1007.1727 |
45 | O. J. P. \'Eboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and J. K. Mizukoshi | pp→ jje±μ±νν and jje±μ∓νν at O(α6em) and O(α4emα2s) for the study of the quartic electroweak gauge boson vertex at CERN LHC | PRD 74 (2006) 073005 | hep-ph/0606118 |
46 | S. S. Wilks | The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses | Ann. Math. Statist 9 (1938) 60 | |
47 | CMS Collaboration | Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and tests of compatibility of its couplings with the standard model predictions using proton collisions at 7 and 8 tev | EPJC 75 (2014) 212 | CMS-HIG-14-009 1412.8662 |
48 | K. Arnold et al. | Vbfnlo: A parton level monte carlo for processes with electroweak bosons | CPC 180 (2009) 1661 | 0811.4559 |
![]() |
Compact Muon Solenoid LHC, CERN |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |