CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-HIN-21-011
Measurement of two-particle Bose-Einstein momentum correlations and their Lévy parameters at ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}=$ 5.02 TeV PbPb collisions
Abstract: Charged hadron, two-particle Bose-Einstein momentum correlation functions in lead-lead (PbPb) collisions at an average center of mass energy per nucleon (${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}$) of 5.02 TeV are presented. The data were obtained in 2018 by the CMS experiment at the LHC. The experimental results are discussed in terms of theoretically derived correlation functions for Levy type source distributions. Using average pair transverse momentum and centrality binning, the source distribution parameters are extracted as a function of pair transverse mass $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ and collision centrality. These parameters include the correlation strength parameter $\lambda$, the Levy index or shape parameter $\alpha$, and the Levy scale parameter $R$. We find that the source shape, characterized by $\alpha$, is neither Cauchy nor Gaussian, implying the need for a full Levy analysis. A hydrodynamical scaling, previously shown to work for Gaussian radii, is also found to hold for $R$.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
An example fit to the double-ratio correlation function $DR(q)$. The fitted function is black, while the red overlay indicates the range used for the fit. The $K_{\mathrm {T}}$ and centrality class is visible in the legend.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The Lévy scale parameter $R$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The Lévy scale parameter $R$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The Lévy scale parameter $R$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 3:
$1/R^2$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (top) and negative (bottom) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated. We fitted a line to the data for each centrality. The fit results are in Table 5.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
$1/R^2$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (top) and negative (bottom) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated. We fitted a line to the data for each centrality. The fit results are in Table 5.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
$1/R^2$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (top) and negative (bottom) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated. We fitted a line to the data for each centrality. The fit results are in Table 5.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The two fit parameters from the linear fit: the slope $A$ (left) and the intercept $B$ (right) versus $\langle N_{\text {part}}\rangle$ for negative and positive hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the systematic uncertainties which originate from the correlated systematic uncertainty of $R$.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The two fit parameters from the linear fit: the slope $A$ (left) and the intercept $B$ (right) versus $\langle N_{\text {part}}\rangle$ for negative and positive hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the systematic uncertainties which originate from the correlated systematic uncertainty of $R$.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The two fit parameters from the linear fit: the slope $A$ (left) and the intercept $B$ (right) versus $\langle N_{\text {part}}\rangle$ for negative and positive hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the systematic uncertainties which originate from the correlated systematic uncertainty of $R$.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The Lévy scale parameter $R$ versus $\langle N_{\text {part}}\rangle^{1/3}$ in different $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ classes for positive (top) and negative (bottom) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated. We fitted a line to the data for each $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ class. The fit results are in Table 6.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The Lévy scale parameter $R$ versus $\langle N_{\text {part}}\rangle^{1/3}$ in different $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ classes for positive (top) and negative (bottom) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated. We fitted a line to the data for each $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ class. The fit results are in Table 6.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The Lévy scale parameter $R$ versus $\langle N_{\text {part}}\rangle^{1/3}$ in different $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ classes for positive (top) and negative (bottom) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated. We fitted a line to the data for each $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ class. The fit results are in Table 6.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The Lévy stability index $\alpha $ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The Lévy stability index $\alpha $ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The Lévy stability index $\alpha $ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 7:
The average Lévy stability index $\langle \alpha \rangle$ versus $\langle N_{\text {part}}\rangle$ for both positive and negative hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the systematic uncertainties which originate from the correlated systematic uncertaity of $\alpha $.

png pdf
Figure 8:
The correlation strength $\lambda $ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
The correlation strength $\lambda $ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
The correlation strength $\lambda $ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 9:
The correlation strength re-scaled with the square of the pion ratio $\lambda ^*$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
The correlation strength re-scaled with the square of the pion ratio $\lambda ^*$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
The correlation strength re-scaled with the square of the pion ratio $\lambda ^*$ versus the transverse mass $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ in different centrality classes for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs. The error bars are the statistical uncertainties, while the boxes indicate the point-to-point systematic uncertainties. The correlated systematic uncertainty is also indicated.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The sources of the systematic uncertainties with their values in the default and other two settings. The meaning of the analysis parameters are given in Subsections 4.1 and 4.2.

png pdf
Table 2:
The relative effect of the different types of systematic sources in each centrality class for the $R$ parameter (in percentage). We averaged over $K_{\mathrm {T}}$ and the two charge setups. $\uparrow$ ($\downarrow$) represents positive (negative) modification in the value of the parameter.

png pdf
Table 3:
The relative effect of the different types of systematic sources in each centrality class for the $\alpha $ parameter (in percentage). We averaged over $K_{\mathrm {T}}$ and the two charge setups. $\uparrow$ ($\downarrow$) represents positive (negative) modification in the value of the parameter.

png pdf
Table 4:
The relative effect of the different types of systematic sources in each centrality class for the $\lambda $ parameter (in percentage). We averaged over $K_{\mathrm {T}}$ and the two charge setups. $\uparrow$ ($\downarrow$) represents positive (negative) modification in the value of the parameter.

png pdf
Table 5:
The fit parameters and the confidence levels of the linear fits to $1/R^2$ versus $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs.

png pdf
Table 6:
The fit parameters and the confidence levels of the linear fits to $R$ versus $\langle N_{\text {part}}\rangle^{1/3}$ for positive (left) and negative (right) hadron pairs.
Summary
In this note we presented two-particle Bose-Einstein correlation function measurements based on approximately 2.65$\times $10$^9$ lead-lead (PbPb) events with ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV, recorded by CMS at the LHC. The correlation functions, found in different centrality and average transverse momentum ($K_{\mathrm{T}}$) classes, are analyzed in terms of stable Lévy sources within the core-halo model including Coulomb effects. The values of the Lévy scale parameter $R$, the Lévy stability index $\alpha$, correlation strength $\lambda$ are determined.

The geometrical interpretation of the $R$ parameter is investigated by determining its dependence on the average number of participating nucleons in the collision ($\langle N_{\text{part}}\rangle$). A linear dependence of $1/R^2$ with the transverse mass ($m_{\mathrm{T}}$) assuming a pion mass for the charged particles is observed, consistent with having a hydrodynamic scaling even in the case of Lévy sources. Based on the observed linear behavior, it is estimated that the Hubble constant of the QGP created in 5.02 TeV PbPb collisions is between 0.12 c/fm and 0.18 c/fm. The $1/R^2$ intercept of the linear fits is negative in all cases. This requires further phenomenological studies. We found the $\alpha$ parameter to have little, if any, $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ dependence and to range between 1.6 and 2, increasing with centrality. We also measured a strong and decreasing trend for the $\lambda$ parameter as a function of $m_{\mathrm{T}}$. The $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ dependence is explained in terms of the lack of particle identification. After rescaling the $\lambda$ values to account for the pion fraction in each analysis range, a nearly constant trend of the mass fraction corrected $\lambda^*$ value with $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ is observed. The $\lambda^*$ values are found to decrease as the collisions become more central. Altogether, these results imply that the hadron emitting source in ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}=$ 5.02 TeV PbPb collisions can be described by Lévy distributions in a statistically acceptable manner, making the above discussed interpretation of the Lévy source parameters possible.
References
1 R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss A test of a new type of stellar interferometer on Sirius Nature 178 (1956) 1046
2 R. J. Glauber Photon correlations PRL 10 (1963) 84
3 R. J. Glauber Nobel lecture: One hundred years of light quanta Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 (2006) 1267
4 R. J. Glauber Quantum optics and heavy ion physics NP A 774 (2006) 3 nucl-th/0604021
5 G. Goldhaber, W. B. Fowler, S. Goldhaber, and T. F. Hoang Pion-pion correlations in antiproton annihilation events PRL 3 (1959) 181
6 G. Goldhaber, S. Goldhaber, W.-Y. Lee, and A. Pais Influence of Bose-Einstein statistics on the antiproton proton annihilation process PR120 (1960) 300
7 PHENIX Collaboration Bose-Einstein correlations of charged pion pairs in Au + Au collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 200 GeV PRL 93 (2004) 152302 nucl-ex/0401003
8 PHENIX Collaboration Kaon interferometric probes of space-time evolution in Au+Au collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 200 GeV PRL 103 (2009) 142 0903.4863
9 A. N. Makhlin and Y. M. Sinyukov Hydrodynamics of hadron matter under pion interferometric microscope Z. Phys. C 39 (1988) 69
10 T. Csörgó and B. Lörstad Bose-Einstein correlations for three-dimensionally expanding, cylindrically symmetric, finite systems PRC 54 (1996) 1390 hep-ph/9509213
11 STAR Collaboration Pion interferometry in Au+Au collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 200 GeV PRC 71 (2005) 044906 nucl-ex/0411036
12 ALICE Collaboration One-dimensional pion, kaon, and proton femtoscopy in Pb-Pb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 2.76 TeV PRC 92 (2015) 054908 1506.07884
13 CMS Collaboration Bose-Einstein correlations in pp, pPb, and PbPb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}=$ 0.9-7 TeV PRC 97 (2018) 064912 CMS-FSQ-14-002
1712.07198
14 ATLAS Collaboration Femtoscopy with identified charged pions in proton-lead collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}= $ 5.02 TeV with ATLAS PRC 96 (2017) 064908 1704.01621
15 T. Csörgó Particle interferometry from 40 MeV to 40 TeV Acta Phys. Hung. A 15 (2002) 1 hep-ph/0001233
16 U. A. Wiedemann and U. W. Heinz Particle interferometry for relativistic heavy ion collisions PR 319 (1999) 145 nucl-th/9901094
17 J. Bolz et al. Resonance decays and partial coherence in Bose-Einstein correlations PRD 47 (1993) 3860
18 T. Csörgó, B. Lörstad, and J. Zimànyi Bose-Einstein correlations for systems with large halo Z. Phys. C 71 (1996) 491 hep-ph/9411307
19 PHENIX Collaboration Lévy-stable two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations in $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}= $ 200 GeV Au$ + $Au collisions PRC 97 (2018) 064911 1709.05649
20 R. Metzler, E. Barkai, and J. Klafter Anomalous diffusion and relaxation close to thermal equilibrium: A fractional Fokker-Planck equation approach PRL 82 (1999) 3563
21 T. Csörgó, S. Hegyi, and W. A. Zajc Bose-Einstein correlations for Lévy stable source distributions EPJC 36 (2004) 67 nucl-th/0310042
22 Y. Sinyukov et al. Coulomb corrections for interferometry analysis of expanding hadron systems PLB 432 (1998) 248
23 M. Csanàd, S. Lökös, and M. Nagy Expanded empirical formula for Coulomb final state interaction in the presence of Lévy sources Phys. Part. Nucl. 51 (2020) 238 1910.02231
24 CMS Tracker Group Collaboration The CMS phase-1 pixel detector upgrade JINST 16 (2021) P02027 2012.14304
25 CMS Collaboration Track impact parameter resolution for the full pseudo rapidity coverage in the 2017 dataset with the CMS phase-1 pixel detector CDS
26 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
27 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
28 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
29 L3 Collaboration Test of the $ \tau $-model of Bose-Einstein correlations and reconstruction of the source function in hadronic Z-boson decay at LEP EPJC 71 (2011) 1648 1105.4788
30 CMS Collaboration Bose-Einstein correlations of charged hadrons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 03 (2020) 014 CMS-FSQ-15-009
1910.08815
31 F. James and M. Roos Minuit: A system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations CPC 10 (1975) 343
32 D. Kincses, M. I. Nagy, and M. Csanàd Coulomb and strong interactions in the final state of Hanbury-Brown-Twiss correlations for Lévy-type source functions PRC 102 (2020) 064912 1912.01381
33 M. Chojnacki, W. Florkowski, and T. Csörgó On the formation of Hubble flow in little bangs PRC 71 (2005) 044902 nucl-th/0410036
34 T. Csörgó Simple analytic solution of fireball hydrodynamics Central Eur. J. Phys. 2 (2004) 556 nucl-th/9809011
35 C. Loizides, J. Kamin, and D. d'Enterria Improved Monte Carlo Glauber predictions at present and future nuclear colliders PRC 97 (2018) 054910 1710.07098
36 V. V. Uchaikin and V. M. Zolotarev Chance and Stability: Stable Distributions and their Applications De Gruyter, 2011 , ISBN 9783110935974
37 ALICE Collaboration Production of charged pions, kaons, and (anti-)protons in Pb-Pb and inelastic pp collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV PRC 101 (2020) 044907 1910.07678
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN