CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-TOP-18-005 ; CERN-EP-2019-255
Measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in dilepton final states containing one $\tau$ lepton in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
JHEP 02 (2020) 191
Abstract: The cross section of top quark pair production is measured in the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\to (\ell\nu_{\ell})({\tau_\mathrm{h}}\nu_{\tau})\mathrm{b\bar{b}}$ final state, where ${\tau_\mathrm{h}}$ refers to the hadronic decays of the $\tau$ lepton, and $\ell$ is either an electron or a muon. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ collected in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the CMS detector. The measured cross section is $\sigma_{\mathrm{t\bar{t}}} = $ 781 $\pm$ 7 (stat) $\pm$ 62 (syst) $\pm$ 20 (lumi) pb, and the ratio of the partial width $\Gamma(\mathrm{t}\to\tau\nu_{\tau}\mathrm{b})$ to the total decay width of the top quark is measured to be 0.1050 $\pm$ 0.0009 (stat) $\pm$ 0.0071 (syst). This is the first measurement of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production cross section in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV that explicitly includes $\tau$ leptons. The ratio of the cross sections in the $\ell{\tau_\mathrm{h}}$ and $\ell\ell$ final states yields a value $R_{\ell{\tau_\mathrm{h}}/\ell\ell}=$ 0.973 $\pm$ 0.009 (stat) $\pm$ 0.066 (syst), consistent with lepton universality.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The $ {\tau _\mathrm {h}}$ $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distributions for events of the e$ {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ (left) and $\mu {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ (right) final states observed prior to fitting. Distributions obtained from data (filled circles) are compared with simulation (shaded histograms). The last bin includes overflow events. The simulated contributions are normalized to the cross section values predicted in the SM. The main processes are shown: the signal, the other ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ processes grouped together, single top quark production, W+jets, DY processes, diboson, and multijet production. The ratio of the data to the total SM prediction is shown in the lower panel. The hatched bands indicate the systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties of all simulated samples. Statistical uncertainties on the data points are not visible because of the scale of the figure.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The $ {\tau _\mathrm {h}}$ $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distributions for events of the e$ {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ final state observed prior to fitting. Distributions obtained from data (filled circles) are compared with simulation (shaded histograms). The last bin includes overflow events. The simulated contributions are normalized to the cross section values predicted in the SM. The main processes are shown: the signal, the other ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ processes grouped together, single top quark production, W+jets, DY processes, diboson, and multijet production. The ratio of the data to the total SM prediction is shown in the lower panel. The hatched bands indicate the systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties of all simulated samples. Statistical uncertainties on the data points are not visible because of the scale of the figure.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The $ {\tau _\mathrm {h}}$ $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ distributions for events of the $\mu {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ final state observed prior to fitting. Distributions obtained from data (filled circles) are compared with simulation (shaded histograms). The last bin includes overflow events. The simulated contributions are normalized to the cross section values predicted in the SM. The main processes are shown: the signal, the other ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ processes grouped together, single top quark production, W+jets, DY processes, diboson, and multijet production. The ratio of the data to the total SM prediction is shown in the lower panel. The hatched bands indicate the systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties of all simulated samples. Statistical uncertainties on the data points are not visible because of the scale of the figure.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Comparison of the signal (${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} \to \ell \nu _{\ell} {\tau _\mathrm {h}} \nu _{\tau} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}} $) and the main background of misidentified $ {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ (${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} \to \ell \nu _{\ell} \mathrm{q} \mathrm{\bar{q}} ' \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}} $) in the shapes of the normalized distributions of the transverse mass $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ between the lepton and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$ (left), and the $D^\mathrm {min}_{\mathrm {jjb}}$ parameter (see text) of the event categories (right). In the $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution, the signal may extend beyond the W boson mass endpoint because of the two-neutrino final state, whereas the background process cannot. The last bin in both distributions includes overflow events. In the $D^\mathrm {min}_{\mathrm {jjb}}$ distribution, the downward arrow points at the threshold of the cut used ($D^\mathrm {min}_{\mathrm {jjb}} > $ 60 GeV), and the panel on the right shows the fraction of events in the "signal-like'' category where there is only one untagged jet.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Comparison of the signal (${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} \to \ell \nu _{\ell} {\tau _\mathrm {h}} \nu _{\tau} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}} $) and the main background of misidentified $ {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ (${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} \to \ell \nu _{\ell} \mathrm{q} \mathrm{\bar{q}} ' \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}} $) in the shapes of the normalized distributions of the transverse mass $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $ between the lepton and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$. The signal may extend beyond the W boson mass endpoint because of the two-neutrino final state, whereas the background process cannot. The last bin in the distribution includes overflow events.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Comparison of the signal (${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} \to \ell \nu _{\ell} {\tau _\mathrm {h}} \nu _{\tau} \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}} $) and the main background of misidentified $ {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ (${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}} \to \ell \nu _{\ell} \mathrm{q} \mathrm{\bar{q}} ' \mathrm{b} \mathrm{\bar{b}} $) in the shapes of the normalized distributions of the $D^\mathrm {min}_{\mathrm {jjb}}$ parameter (see text) of the event categories. The last bin in the distribution includes overflow events. The downward arrow points at the threshold of the cut used ($D^\mathrm {min}_{\mathrm {jjb}} > $ 60 GeV), and the panel on the right shows the fraction of events in the "signal-like'' category where there is only one untagged jet.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The transverse mass distributions between lepton (e or $\mu $) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $, in the signal-like (upper) and background-like (lower) event categories for the e$ {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ (left) and $\mu {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ (right) final states observed prior to fitting. Distributions obtained from data (filled circles) are compared with simulation (shaded histograms). The last bin includes overflow events. The simulated contributions are normalized to the cross section values predicted in the SM. The main processes are shown: the signal, the other ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ processes grouped together, single top quark production, W+jets, DY processes, diboson, and multijet production. The ratio of the data to the total SM prediction is shown in the lower panel. The vertical bars on the data points indicate the statistical uncertainties, the hatched band indicates the systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties in all simulated samples.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The transverse mass distributions between lepton (e or $\mu $) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $, in the signal-like event category for the e$ {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ final state observed prior to fitting. The distribution obtained from data (filled circles) is compared with simulation (shaded histograms). The last bin includes overflow events. The simulated contributions are normalized to the cross section values predicted in the SM. The main processes are shown: the signal, the other ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ processes grouped together, single top quark production, W+jets, DY processes, diboson, and multijet production. The ratio of the data to the total SM prediction is shown in the lower panel. The vertical bars on the data points indicate the statistical uncertainties, the hatched band indicates the systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties in all simulated samples.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The transverse mass distributions between lepton (e or $\mu $) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $, in the signal-like event category for the $\mu {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ final state observed prior to fitting. The distribution obtained from data (filled circles) is compared with simulation (shaded histograms). The last bin includes overflow events. The simulated contributions are normalized to the cross section values predicted in the SM. The main processes are shown: the signal, the other ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ processes grouped together, single top quark production, W+jets, DY processes, diboson, and multijet production. The ratio of the data to the total SM prediction is shown in the lower panel. The vertical bars on the data points indicate the statistical uncertainties, the hatched band indicates the systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties in all simulated samples.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The transverse mass distributions between lepton (e or $\mu $) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $, in the background-like event category for the e$ {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ final state observed prior to fitting. The distribution obtained from data (filled circles) is compared with simulation (shaded histograms). The last bin includes overflow events. The simulated contributions are normalized to the cross section values predicted in the SM. The main processes are shown: the signal, the other ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ processes grouped together, single top quark production, W+jets, DY processes, diboson, and multijet production. The ratio of the data to the total SM prediction is shown in the lower panel. The vertical bars on the data points indicate the statistical uncertainties, the hatched band indicates the systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties in all simulated samples.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
The transverse mass distributions between lepton (e or $\mu $) and ${{p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^\text {miss}}$, $ {m_{\mathrm {T}}} $, in the background-like event category for the $\mu {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ final state observed prior to fitting. The distribution obtained from data (filled circles) is compared with simulation (shaded histograms). The last bin includes overflow events. The simulated contributions are normalized to the cross section values predicted in the SM. The main processes are shown: the signal, the other ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ processes grouped together, single top quark production, W+jets, DY processes, diboson, and multijet production. The ratio of the data to the total SM prediction is shown in the lower panel. The vertical bars on the data points indicate the statistical uncertainties, the hatched band indicates the systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties in all simulated samples.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The expected and observed dependence of the likelihood on the total ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}$ cross section $\sigma _{{\mathrm{t} \mathrm{\bar{t}}}}$. It is derived from the fiducial phase space by a simple extrapolation. The arrow points at the cross section measured in the light dilepton final state. The goodness of the fit determined with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov method yields a $p$ value of 0.24.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Expected and observed event yields in the $\ell {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ ($\ell =\mathrm{e},\mu $) final state for signal and background processes for an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown. The expected prefit contributions of all processes are presented separately for background-like and signal-like event categories. The statistical uncertainties of the modelling are shown for the processes estimated from the simulation. The multijet contribution and the corresponding statistical uncertainties are estimated using data, as described in Section 6.

png pdf
Table 2:
Systematic and statistical uncertainties determined from the fit to the data in the e$ {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ and $\mu {\tau _\mathrm {h}} $ final states, and their combination. Uncertainties are grouped by their origin: experimental, theoretical, and extrapolation. The uncertainties in the measurement in the dilepton final state [14] used in the partial width ratio estimate are also quoted (column "dileptons"), where the asymmetric extrapolation uncertainties are symmetrized by adding them in quadrature. As both measurements use the same data, some uncertainties are correlated, as shown in the last column.
Summary
A measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\to (\ell \mathrm{g}n_{\ell}) ({\tau_\mathrm{h}} \mathrm{g}n_{\tau}) \mathrm{b\bar{b}}$ channel, where $\ell$ is either an electron or a muon, is performed by CMS in proton-proton collisions at LHC, using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ obtained at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV. Events are selected by requiring the presence of an electron or a muon, and at least three jets, of which at least one is b tagged and one is identified as a $\tau$ lepton decaying to hadrons (${\tau_\mathrm{h}}$). The largest background contribution arises from $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ lepton+jets events, $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\to (\ell\mathrm{g}n_{\ell})(\mathrm{q\bar{q}}')\mathrm{b\bar{b}}$, where one jet is misidentified as the ${\tau_\mathrm{h}}$. The background contribution is constrained in a fit to the distribution of the transverse mass of the light lepton and missing transverse momentum system in two event categories, constructed according to the kinematic properties of the jets in the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ lepton+jets final state. The signal enters as a free parameter without constraining the kinematic properties of the $\tau$ lepton. Assuming a top quark mass of 172.5 GeV, the measured total $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ cross section $\sigma_{\mathrm{t\bar{t}}}(\ell{\tau_\mathrm{h}}) =$ 781 $\pm$ 7 (stat) $\pm$ 62 (syst) $\pm$ 20 (lumi) pb is in agreement with the standard model expectation. This is the first measurement of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production cross section in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV that explicitly includes hadronically decaying $\tau$ leptons, and it improves the relative precision with respect to the 7 and 8 TeV results [64,65]. The higher precision is achieved through a shape fit to the kinematic distributions of the events, thus better constraining the backgrounds. The measurement of the ratio of the cross sections in the $\ell{\tau_\mathrm{h}}$ final state to the light dilepton cross section [14] yields a value of $R_{\ell{\tau_\mathrm{h}}/\ell\ell}=$ 0.973 $\pm$ 0.009 (stat) $\pm$ 0.066 (syst), consistent with lepton universality. The ratio of the partial to the total width of the top quark $\Gamma(\mathrm{t}\to\tau\mathrm{g}n_{\tau}\mathrm{b})/\Gamma_{\mathrm{total}}=$ 0.1050 $\pm$ 0.0009 (stat) $\pm$ 0.0071 (syst) is measured with respect to the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive cross section extrapolated from the light dilepton final state, improving the precision over the previous measurements [63,62].
References
1 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton flavor universality by the measurement of the $ \mathrm{B}^0 \to \mathrm{D}^{*-} \tau^+ \nu_{\tau} $ branching fraction using three-prong $ \tau $ decays PRD 97 (2018) 072013 1711.02505
2 LHCb Collaboration Search for lepton-universality violation in $ \mathrm{B}^+\to \mathrm{K}^+\ell^+\ell^- $ decays PRL 122 (2019) 191801 1903.09252
3 BaBar Collaboration Evidence for an excess of $ \bar{\mathrm{B}} \to \mathrm{D}^{(*)} \tau^-\bar{\nu}_\tau $ decays PRL 109 (2012) 101802 1205.5442
4 BaBar Collaboration Measurement of an excess of $ \bar{\mathrm{B}} \to \mathrm{D}^{(*)}\tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons PRD 88 (2013) 072012 1303.0571
5 S. Bifani, S. Descotes-Genon, A. Romero Vidal, and M.-H. Schune Review of lepton universality tests in $ \mathrm{B} $ decays JPG 46 (2019) 023001 1809.06229
6 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the branching ratio of $ \bar{\mathrm{B}} \to \mathrm{D}^{(\ast)} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ relative to $ \bar{\mathrm{B}} \to \mathrm{D}^{(\ast)} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell $ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle PRD 92 (2015) 072014 1507.03233
7 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the branching ratio of $ \bar{\mathrm{B}}^0 \rightarrow \mathrm{D}^{*+} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_{\tau} $ relative to $ \bar{\mathrm{B}}^0 \rightarrow \mathrm{D}^{*+} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_{\ell} $ decays with a semileptonic tagging method PRD 94 (2016) 072007 1607.07923
8 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the $ \tau $ lepton polarization and $ R(\mathrm{D}^*) $ in the decay $ \bar{\mathrm{B}} \to \mathrm{D}^* \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ PRL 118 (2017) 211801 1612.00529
9 A. Djouadi The anatomy of electroweak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model PR 459 (2008) 1 hep-ph/0503173
10 G. C. Branco et al. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models PR 516 (2012) 1 1106.0034
11 CMS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons in the $ \mathrm{H}^{\pm}\to \tau^{\pm}\nu_\tau $ decay channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2019) 142 CMS-HIG-18-014
1903.04560
12 ATLAS Collaboration Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying via $ \mathrm{H}^{\pm} \to \tau^{\pm}\nu_{\tau} $ in the $ \tau $+jets and $ \tau $+lepton final states with 36 fb$ ^{-1} $ of pp collision data recorded at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment JHEP 09 (2018) 139 1807.07915
13 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
14 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ production cross section, the top quark mass, and the strong coupling constant using dilepton events in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV EPJC 79 (2019) 368 CMS-TOP-17-001
1812.10505
15 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
16 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
17 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
18 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
19 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
20 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, P. Nason, and E. Re Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers JHEP 04 (2015) 114 1412.1828
21 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
22 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
23 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
24 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
25 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
26 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
27 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
28 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
29 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
30 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
31 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 ~TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
32 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
33 S. Dulat et al. New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics PRD 93 (2016) 033006 1506.07443
34 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ PRD 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
35 M. Aliev et al. HATHOR: HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR CPC 182 (2011) 1034 1007.1327
36 P. Kant et al. HatHor for single top-quark production: Updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions CPC 191 (2015) 74 1406.4403
37 N. Kidonakis Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W- or H- PRD 82 (2010) 054018 1005.4451
38 N. Kidonakis NNLL threshold resummation for top-pair and single-top production Phys. Part. Nucl. 45 (2014) 714 1210.7813
39 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC NPPS 205-206 (2010) 10 1007.3492
40 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
41 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
42 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
43 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
44 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon performance in CMS with the full 2016 data sample. CDS
45 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
46 CMS Collaboration Performance of reconstruction and identification of $ \tau $ leptons decaying to hadrons and $ \nu_\tau $ in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P10005 CMS-TAU-16-003
1809.02816
47 CMS Collaboration Measurements of inclusive W and Z cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 01 (2011) 080 CMS-EWK-10-002
1012.2466
48 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
49 Particle Data Group, M. Tanabashi et al. Review of particle physics PRD 98 (2018) 030001
50 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PRL 117 (2016) 182002 1606.02625
51 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
52 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
53 OPAL Collaboration Inclusive analysis of the b quark fragmentation function in Z decays at LEP EPJC 29 (2003) 463 hep-ex/0210031
54 ALEPH Collaboration Study of the fragmentation of b quarks into B mesons at the Z peak PLB 512 (2001) 30 hep-ex/0106051
55 SLD Collaboration Measurement of the b quark fragmentation function in $ \rm{Z^{0}} $ decays PRD 65 (2002) 092006 hep-ex/0202031
56 DELPHI Collaboration A study of the b-quark fragmentation function with the DELPHI detector at LEP I and an averaged distribution obtained at the Z pole EPJC 71 (2011) 1557 1102.4748
57 M. G. Bowler $ \mathrm{e}^{+}\mathrm{e}^{{-}} $ production of heavy quarks in the string model Z. Phys. C 11 (1981) 169
58 C. Peterson, D. Schlatter, I. Schmitt, and P. M. Zerwas Scaling violations in inclusive $ \mathrm{e}^{+}\mathrm{e}^{{-}} $ annihilation spectra PRD 27 (1983) 105
59 CMS Collaboration Measurement of normalized differential $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ cross sections in the dilepton channel from pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 04 (2018) 060 CMS-TOP-16-007
1708.07638
60 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV PRD 95 (2017) 092001 CMS-TOP-16-008
1610.04191
61 CMS Collaboration Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in Pythia 8 in the modelling of $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
62 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of the top quark branching ratios into channels with leptons and quarks with the ATLAS detector PRD 92 (2015) 072005 1506.05074
63 CDF Collaboration Study of top-quark production and decays involving a tau lepton at CDF and limits on a charged-Higgs boson contribution PRD 89 (2014) 091101 1402.6728
64 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV in dilepton final states containing a $ \tau $ PRD 85 (2012) 112007 CMS-TOP-11-006
1203.6810
65 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ production cross section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt {s} = $ 8 ~TeV in dilepton final states containing one $ \tau $ lepton PLB 739 (2014) 23 CMS-TOP-12-026
1407.6643
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN