CMS-SMP-20-010

CMS-SMP-20-010 ; CERN-EP-2021-161
Study of quark and gluon jet substructure in Z+jet and dijet events from pp collisions
CMS Collaboration
8 September 2021
JHEP 01 (2022) 188
Abstract: Measurements of jet substructure describing the composition of quark- and gluon-initiated jets are presented. Proton-proton (pp) collision data at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV collected with the CMS detector are used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Generalized angularities are measured that characterize the jet substructure and distinguish quark- and gluon-initiated jets. These observables are sensitive to the distributions of transverse momenta and angular distances within a jet. The analysis is performed using a data sample of dijet events enriched in gluon-initiated jets, and, for the first time, a Z+jet event sample enriched in quark-initiated jets. The observables are measured in bins of jet transverse momentum, and as a function of the jet radius parameter. Each measurement is repeated applying a "soft drop" grooming procedure that removes soft and large angle radiation from the jet. Using these measurements, the ability of various models to describe jet substructure is assessed, showing a clear need for improvements in Monte Carlo generators.
Links: e-print arXiv:2109.03340 [hep-ex] (PDF) ; CDS record ; inSPIRE record ; HepData record ; CADI line (restricted) ;

Figures & Tables	Summary	Additional Figures	References	CMS Publications

Figures
png pdf	Figure 1: The five generalized angularities ${\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}}$ used in this analysis, represented in the $(\kappa, \beta)$ plane. The Les Houches Angularity is denoted by LHA. Adapted from Ref. [46].
png pdf	Figure 2: Fraction of AK4 jets that are gluon jets in the Z+jet sample (red triangles), and the central (black circles) and forward (blue squares) dijet samples. The statistical uncertainty is negligible in the simulation.
png pdf	Figure 3: Data to simulation comparisons of the jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet (right) regions. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainties in the experimental data. The coarse-grained hashed region in each ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty in the experimental data, and the fine-grained hashed region represents the total uncertainty in the MC prediction.
png pdf	Figure 3-a: Data to simulation comparisons of the jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in the Z+jet region. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainties in the experimental data. The coarse-grained hashed region in each ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty in the experimental data, and the fine-grained hashed region represents the total uncertainty in the MC prediction.
png pdf	Figure 3-b: Data to simulation comparisons of the jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in the central dijet region. The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainties in the experimental data. The coarse-grained hashed region in each ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty in the experimental data, and the fine-grained hashed region represents the total uncertainty in the MC prediction.
png pdf	Figure 4: Detector-level and particle-level (unfolded) experimental data distributions of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) (left) using charged+neutral constituents, and $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$) (right) using only charged constituents, for jets with 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (red) and central dijet (black) regions. The detector-level data uncertainties are statistical. The particle-level (unfolded) data uncertainties include the systematic components. Also shown is the mean of each distribution, calculated from the binned data. The ratio plots show the ratio of dijet to Z+jet distributions, for both the detector- and particle-level distributions.
png pdf	Figure 4-a: Detector-level and particle-level (unfolded) experimental data distributions of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) using charged+neutral constituents, for jets with 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (red) and central dijet (black) regions. The detector-level data uncertainties are statistical. The particle-level (unfolded) data uncertainties include the systematic components. Also shown is the mean of each distribution, calculated from the binned data. The ratio plot shows the ratio of dijet to Z+jet distributions, for both the detector- and particle-level distributions.
png pdf	Figure 4-b: Detector-level and particle-level (unfolded) experimental data distributions of $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$) using only charged constituents, for jets with 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (red) and central dijet (black) regions. The detector-level data uncertainties are statistical. The particle-level (unfolded) data uncertainties include the systematic components. Also shown is the mean of each distribution, calculated from the binned data. The ratio plot shows the ratio of dijet to Z+jet distributions, for both the detector- and particle-level distributions.
png pdf	Figure 5: Ratio of the distribution that results from a varied response matrix to the nominal distribution of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) for AK4 jets with 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region before (left) and after (right) normalization. Filled symbols correspond to upward variations, and the corresponding downward variations are represented by open symbols. The coarse-grained hashed region indicates the statistical uncertainty of the experimental data, and the fine-grained hashed region represents the total uncertainty, the sum in quadrature of statistical and systematic uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 5-a: Ratio of the distribution that results from a varied response matrix to the nominal distribution of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) for AK4 jets with 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region before normalization. Filled symbols correspond to upward variations, and the corresponding downward variations are represented by open symbols. The coarse-grained hashed region indicates the statistical uncertainty of the experimental data, and the fine-grained hashed region represents the total uncertainty, the sum in quadrature of statistical and systematic uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 5-b: Ratio of the distribution that results from a varied response matrix to the nominal distribution of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) for AK4 jets with 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region after normalization. Filled symbols correspond to upward variations, and the corresponding downward variations are represented by open symbols. The coarse-grained hashed region indicates the statistical uncertainty of the experimental data, and the fine-grained hashed region represents the total uncertainty, the sum in quadrature of statistical and systematic uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 6: Particle-level distributions of (upper) ungroomed multiplicity ($\lambda ^{0}_{0}$) and (lower) ungroomed $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 6-a: Particle-level distribution of ungroomed multiplicity ($\lambda ^{0}_{0}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet egion. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 6-b: Particle-level distribution of ungroomed multiplicity ($\lambda ^{0}_{0}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 6-c: Particle-level distribution of ungroomed $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 6-d: Particle-level distribution of ungroomed $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 7: Particle-level distributions of (upper) ungroomed thrust ($\lambda ^{1}_{2}$) and (lower) ungroomed width ($\lambda ^{1}_{1}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 7-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed thrust ($\lambda ^{1}_{2}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 7-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed thrust ($\lambda ^{1}_{2}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region.The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 7-c: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed width ($\lambda ^{1}_{1}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region.The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 7-d: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed width ($\lambda ^{1}_{1}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region.The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 8: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 8-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 8-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 9: Particle-level distributions of (upper) ungroomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV in the central dijet region (right) and (lower) ungroomed AK8 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 9-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 1500 GeV in the Z+jet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 9-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV in the central dijet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 9-c: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 9-d: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 10: Particle-level distributions of (upper) ungroomed charged AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) and (lower) groomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 10-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 10-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 10-c: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 10-d: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the central dijet region. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. For the NLO+NLL'+NP prediction, the theory uncertainty is displayed as a red hashed band. The coarse-grained blue hashed region in the ratio plot indicates the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the fine-grained grey hashed region represents the total uncertainty. The lowest bin extends down to $ {\lambda ^{\kappa}_{\beta}} \geq$ 0.
png pdf	Figure 11: Mean value of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) for AK4 jets as a function of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right) regions. The upper and lower plots show the same data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data and the hashed region in the ratio plot correspond to the total uncertainties of the experimental data. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 11-a: Mean value of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) for AK4 jets as a function of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in the Z+jet region. The plot shows the data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data and the hashed region in the ratio plot correspond to the total uncertainties of the experimental data. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 11-b: Mean value of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) for AK4 jets as a function of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in the central dijet region. The plot shows the data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data and the hashed region in the ratio plot correspond to the total uncertainties of the experimental data. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 11-c: Mean value of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) for AK4 jets as a function of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in the Z+jet region. The plot shows the data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data and the hashed region in the ratio plot correspond to the total uncertainties of the experimental data. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 11-d: Mean value of ungroomed LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) for AK4 jets as a function of ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in the central dijet region. The plot shows the data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data and the hashed region in the ratio plot correspond to the total uncertainties of the experimental data. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 12: Mean value of substructure observables in regions with gluon-enriched and quark-enriched jets, for the following configurations: (1) ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (2) ungroomed AK4 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV, (3) ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (4) ungroomed charged AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and (5) groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV; shown for each of the observables LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), width ($\lambda ^{1}_{1}$), thrust ($\lambda ^{1}_{2}$), multiplicity ($\lambda ^{0}_{0}$), and $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$). The central jet in the dijet region is used for the gluon-enriched sample, whereas for the quark-enriched sample the jet in the Z+jet region is used for 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and the forward jet in the dijet region is used for 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV. The upper and lower plots show the same data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 12-a: Mean value of substructure observables in regions with gluon-enriched and quark-enriched jets, for the following configurations: (1) ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (2) ungroomed AK4 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV, (3) ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (4) ungroomed charged AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and (5) groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV; shown for each of the observables LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), width ($\lambda ^{1}_{1}$), thrust ($\lambda ^{1}_{2}$), multiplicity ($\lambda ^{0}_{0}$), and $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$). The central jet in the dijet region is used for the gluon-enriched sample, whereas for the quark-enriched sample the jet in the Z+jet region is used for 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and the forward jet in the dijet region is used for 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV. The plot shows the data distributions compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 12-b: Mean value of substructure observables in regions with gluon-enriched and quark-enriched jets, for the following configurations: (1) ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (2) ungroomed AK4 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV, (3) ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (4) ungroomed charged AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and (5) groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV; shown for each of the observables LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), width ($\lambda ^{1}_{1}$), thrust ($\lambda ^{1}_{2}$), multiplicity ($\lambda ^{0}_{0}$), and $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$). The central jet in the dijet region is used for the gluon-enriched sample, whereas for the quark-enriched sample the jet in the Z+jet region is used for 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and the forward jet in the dijet region is used for 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV. The plot shows the data distributions compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 13: Ratio of the mean of substructure observables in regions with gluon- and quark-enriched jets, for the following configurations: (1) ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (2) ungroomed AK4 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV, (3) ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (4) ungroomed charged AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and (5) groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV; for the observables LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), width ($\lambda ^{1}_{1}$), thrust ($\lambda ^{1}_{2}$), multiplicity ($\lambda ^{0}_{0}$), and $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$). The central jet in the dijet region is used for the gluon-enriched sample, whereas for the quark-enriched sample the jet in the Z+jet region is used for 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, whereas the forward jet in the dijet region is used for 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV. The upper and lower plots show the same data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 13-a: Ratio of the mean of substructure observables in regions with gluon- and quark-enriched jets, for the following configurations: (1) ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (2) ungroomed AK4 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV, (3) ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (4) ungroomed charged AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and (5) groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV; for the observables LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), width ($\lambda ^{1}_{1}$), thrust ($\lambda ^{1}_{2}$), multiplicity ($\lambda ^{0}_{0}$), and $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$). The central jet in the dijet region is used for the gluon-enriched sample, whereas for the quark-enriched sample the jet in the Z+jet region is used for 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, whereas the forward jet in the dijet region is used for 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV. The plot shows the data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.
png pdf	Figure 13-b: Ratio of the mean of substructure observables in regions with gluon- and quark-enriched jets, for the following configurations: (1) ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (2) ungroomed AK4 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV, (3) ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (4) ungroomed charged AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and (5) groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV; for the observables LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), width ($\lambda ^{1}_{1}$), thrust ($\lambda ^{1}_{2}$), multiplicity ($\lambda ^{0}_{0}$), and $(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2$ ($\lambda ^{2}_{0}$). The central jet in the dijet region is used for the gluon-enriched sample, whereas for the quark-enriched sample the jet in the Z+jet region is used for 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, whereas the forward jet in the dijet region is used for 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV. The plot shows the data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties.

Tables
png pdf	Table 1: Summary of zero bias and jet triggers used in the analysis for the dijet region. For each trigger, the integrated luminosity and number of events collected by it are given. The offline ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ bin threshold(s) indicate the lower edge of the ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ bin(s) measured with data from a given trigger.
png pdf	Table 2: Summary of the selection criteria for the Z+jet and dijet event samples.
png pdf	Table 3: Summary of the variants of observables measured in this paper.

Summary

Measurements of distributions of generalized jet angularities in proton-proton collision data taken by the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in dijet and, for the first time, also in Z+jet topologies have been presented. Whereas the dijet topology allows access to a sample of jets that predominantly originate from gluon fragmentation, the Z+jet topology yields a sample enriched in quark-initiated jets. Five generalized angularities are measured to study different features in the modelling of jet substructure. Three infrared- and collinear-safe angularities are particularly sensitive to perturbative emissions in jets, whereas the other two have larger contributions from nonperturbative effects. For the first time, a measurement of angularities with different jet radii, both with and without the application of a grooming algorithm, was carried out to further discriminate between different features in the modelling. Although a subset of these distributions was discussed in this paper, the full range of measurements is made public in HEPData record [98]. The measurements for quark and gluon jets yield values in between the predictions from the MadGraph5+MCatNLO+PYTHIA-8 and HERWIG++ simulations. The quality of modelling for the infrared- and collinear-safe angularities is sensitive to the quark and gluon composition of the sample of jets. It is also largely independent of whether a grooming algorithm is applied, suggesting that the quality depends mainly on the perturbative emissions in jets, rather than nonperturbative effects. A calculation based on analytic resummation of large logarithms of the collinear-safe angularities in the Z+jet topology at next-to-leading order + next-to-leading logarithm (NLO+NLL') accuracy including nonperturbative effects best describes the thrust with a $\chi^2/N_{\text{bins}}$ (where $N_{\text{bins}}$ is the number of bins of the distribution) as low as 4.1/5.0, whereas the Les Houches Angularity was described significantly worse with $\chi^2/N_{\text{bins}}$ up to 58/8. A comparison of the means of the angularities in quark- and gluon-enriched data samples demonstrated their discrimination power, which was overestimated by all generators under study, showing a clear need for improvements in the simulation.

Additional Figures
png pdf	Additional Figure 1: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 1-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 1-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 2: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 2-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 2-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 3: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 3-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 3-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 4: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 4-a: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 4-b: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 5: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 5-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 5-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 6: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 6-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 6-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 7: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 7-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 7-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 8: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 8-a: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 8-b: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 9: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 9-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 9-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 10: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 10-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 10-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 11: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 11-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 11-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 12: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 12-a: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 12-b: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 13: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 13-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 13-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 14: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 14-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 14-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 15: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 15-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 15-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 16: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 16-a: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 16-b: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right).
png pdf	Additional Figure 17: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-a: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-b: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-c: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-d: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-e: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-f: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-g: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-h: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-i: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 17-j: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables. The Sherpa NLO+jet (merging of Z+1jet at NLO and Z+2jets at NLO) and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2104.06920.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-a: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-b: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-c: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-d: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-e: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-f: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-g: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-h: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-i: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 18-j: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-a: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-b: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-c: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-d: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-e: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-f: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-g: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-h: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-i: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 19-j: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-a: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-b: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-c: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-d: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-e: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-f: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-g: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-h: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-i: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 20-j: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-a: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-b: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-c: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-d: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-e: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-f: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-g: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-h: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-i: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 21-j: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-a: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-b: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-c: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-d: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-e: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-f: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-g: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-h: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-i: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 22-j: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK4 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-a: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-b: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-c: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-d: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-e: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-f: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-g: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-h: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-i: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 23-j: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-a: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-b: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-c: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-d: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-e: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-f: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-g: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-h: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-i: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 24-j: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-a: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-b: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-c: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-d: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-e: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-f: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-g: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-h: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-i: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 25-j: Plots of distribution mean for ungroomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-a: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-b: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-c: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-d: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-e: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-f: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-g: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-h: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-i: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 26-j: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the Z+jet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-a: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-b: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-c: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-d: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-e: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-f: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-g: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-h: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-i: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 27-j: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the central dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-a: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-b: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-c: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-d: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-e: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-f: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-g: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-h: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-i: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 28-j: Plots of distribution mean for groomed AK8 jets in the forward dijet region, comparing unfolded data to MC. Upper row is charged+neutral variables, lower row is charged-only variables.
png pdf	Additional Figure 29: Upper left: gluon jet flavour fraction as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in central dijet region for AK4 jets. Upper right: gluon jet flavour fraction as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in Z+jet region for AK4 jets. Lower: ratio of gluon jet fraction in central dijet region to Z+jet region as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for AK4 jets. {sherpa} LO+jet is {sherpa} LO with CKKW matching for up to 2 (1) additional outgoing partons for the dijet (Z+jet) processes.
png pdf	Additional Figure 29-a: Upper left: gluon jet flavour fraction as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in central dijet region for AK4 jets. Upper right: gluon jet flavour fraction as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in Z+jet region for AK4 jets. Lower: ratio of gluon jet fraction in central dijet region to Z+jet region as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for AK4 jets. {sherpa} LO+jet is {sherpa} LO with CKKW matching for up to 2 (1) additional outgoing partons for the dijet (Z+jet) processes.
png pdf	Additional Figure 29-b: Upper left: gluon jet flavour fraction as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in central dijet region for AK4 jets. Upper right: gluon jet flavour fraction as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in Z+jet region for AK4 jets. Lower: ratio of gluon jet fraction in central dijet region to Z+jet region as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for AK4 jets. {sherpa} LO+jet is {sherpa} LO with CKKW matching for up to 2 (1) additional outgoing partons for the dijet (Z+jet) processes.
png pdf	Additional Figure 29-c: Upper left: gluon jet flavour fraction as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in central dijet region for AK4 jets. Upper right: gluon jet flavour fraction as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ in Z+jet region for AK4 jets. Lower: ratio of gluon jet fraction in central dijet region to Z+jet region as a function of jet ${p_{\mathrm {T}}}$ for AK4 jets. {sherpa} LO+jet is {sherpa} LO with CKKW matching for up to 2 (1) additional outgoing partons for the dijet (Z+jet) processes.
png pdf	Additional Figure 30: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$)
png pdf	Additional Figure 30-a: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$)
png pdf	Additional Figure 30-b: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$)
png pdf	Additional Figure 31: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 31-a: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 31-b: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 32: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 32-a: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 32-b: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 33: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): multiplicity.
png pdf	Additional Figure 33-a: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): multiplicity.
png pdf	Additional Figure 33-b: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): multiplicity.
png pdf	Additional Figure 34: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 34-a: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 34-b: Data to simulation comparisons for substructure observables in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet regions (right): ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 35: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): ungroomed AK4 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 1500 GeV,
png pdf	Additional Figure 35-a: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): ungroomed AK4 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 1500 GeV,
png pdf	Additional Figure 35-b: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): ungroomed AK4 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 1500 GeV,
png pdf	Additional Figure 36: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV.
png pdf	Additional Figure 36-a: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV.
png pdf	Additional Figure 36-b: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV.
png pdf	Additional Figure 37: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): ungroomed charged-only AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV.
png pdf	Additional Figure 37-a: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): ungroomed charged-only AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV.
png pdf	Additional Figure 37-b: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): ungroomed charged-only AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV.
png pdf	Additional Figure 38: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV.
png pdf	Additional Figure 38-a: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV.
png pdf	Additional Figure 38-b: Data to simulation comparisons for variants of LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in the Z+jet (left) and central dijet region (right): groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV.
png pdf	Additional Figure 39: $\Delta $ of substructure observables in the central dijet (upper), forward dijet (middle) and Z+jet (lower) regions with the following entries on x-axis: ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, ungroomed AK4 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 1500 GeV, ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, ungroomed charged-only AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV for the observables multiplicity, LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$), width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) and thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 39-a: $\Delta $ of substructure observables in the central dijet (upper), forward dijet (middle) and Z+jet (lower) regions with the following entries on x-axis: ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, ungroomed AK4 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 1500 GeV, ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, ungroomed charged-only AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV for the observables multiplicity, LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$), width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) and thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 39-b: $\Delta $ of substructure observables in the central dijet (upper), forward dijet (middle) and Z+jet (lower) regions with the following entries on x-axis: ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, ungroomed AK4 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 1500 GeV, ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, ungroomed charged-only AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV for the observables multiplicity, LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$), width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) and thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 39-c: $\Delta $ of substructure observables in the central dijet (upper), forward dijet (middle) and Z+jet (lower) regions with the following entries on x-axis: ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, ungroomed AK4 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 1500 GeV, ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, ungroomed charged-only AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV for the observables multiplicity, LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$), width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) and thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$).
png pdf	Additional Figure 40: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the Z+jet region (left) and in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 40-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the Z+jet region (left) and in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 40-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the Z+jet region (left) and in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 41: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 41-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 41-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 42: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 42-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 42-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 43: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 43-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 43-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 44: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 44-a: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 44-b: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 45: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the Z+jet region (left) and in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 45-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the Z+jet region (left) and in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 45-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the Z+jet region (left) and in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 46: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 46-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 46-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 47: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 47-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 47-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 48: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 48-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 48-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 49: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 49-a: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 49-b: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 50: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the Z+jet region (left) and in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 50-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the Z+jet region (left) and in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 50-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the Z+jet region (left) and in 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 51: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 51-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 51-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in 408 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and in 1000 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4000 GeV in the central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 52: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 52-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 52-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed AK8 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) in AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 53: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 53-a: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 53-b: Particle-level distributions of ungroomed charged-only AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 54: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 54-a: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 54-b: Particle-level distributions of groomed AK4 thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$) 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV in the Z+jet region (left) and central dijet region (right). The NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 55: Mean value of substructure observables in regions with gluon-enriched and quark-enriched jets, for the following configurations: (1) ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (2) ungroomed AK4 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV, (3) ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (4) ungroomed charged AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and (5) groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV; shown for each of the observables LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$), thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$), multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$), and ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$). The central jet in the dijet region is used for the gluon-enriched sample, whereas for the quark-enriched sample the jet in the Z+jet region is used for 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and the forward jet in the dijet region is used for 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV. The upper and lower plots show the same data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties. The Sherpa NLO+jet and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.
png pdf	Additional Figure 56: Ratio of the mean of substructure observables in regions with gluon- and quark-enriched jets, for the following configurations: (1) ungroomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (2) ungroomed AK4 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV, (3) ungroomed AK8 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, (4) ungroomed charged AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, and (5) groomed AK4 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV; for the observables LHA (${\lambda ^{1}_{0.5}}$), width (${\lambda ^{1}_{1}}$), thrust (${\lambda ^{1}_{2}}$), multiplicity (${\lambda ^{0}_{0}}$), and ${(p_{\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {D}})^2}$ (${\lambda ^{2}_{0}}$). The central jet in the dijet region is used for the gluon-enriched sample, whereas for the quark-enriched sample the jet in the Z+jet region is used for 120 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 150 GeV, whereas the forward jet in the dijet region is used for 1 $ < {p_{\mathrm {T}}} < $ 4 TeV. The upper and lower plots show the same data distribution compared with different generator predictions. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties. The error bars on the simulation correspond to the statistical uncertainties. The Sherpa NLO+jet and NLO+NLL'+NP predictions are taken from arXiv:2112.09545.

References
1	G. P. Salam	Towards jetography	EPJC 67 (2010) 637	0906.1833
2	R. Kogler et al.	Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: experimental review	Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019) 045003	1803.06991
3	A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and B. Nachman	Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: a review of recent advances in theory and machine learning	PR 841 (2020) 1	1709.04464
4	S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and M. Spannowsky	Looking inside jets: an introduction to jet substructure and boosted-object phenomenology	Lect. Notes Phys. 958 (2019) 1	1901.10342
5	K. Konishi, A. Ukawa, and G. Veneziano	Jet calculus: A simple algorithm for resolving QCD jets	NPB 157 (1979) 45
6	OPAL Collaboration	A study of differences between quark and gluon jets using vertex tagging of quark jets	Z. Phys. C 58 (1993) 387
7	OPAL Collaboration	A model independent measurement of quark and gluon jet properties and differences	Z. Phys. C 68 (1995) 179
8	DELPHI Collaboration	Energy dependence of the differences between the quark and gluon jet fragmentation	Z. Phys. C 70 (1996) 179
9	ALEPH Collaboration	Measurements of the structure of quark and gluon jets in hadronic Z decays	EPJC 17 (2000) 1
10	ALEPH Collaboration	Quark and gluon jet properties in symmetric three jet events	PLB 384 (1996) 353
11	ALEPH Collaboration	Studies of quantum chromodynamics with the ALEPH detector	PR 294 (1998) 1
12	P. Gras et al.	Systematics of quark/gluon tagging	JHEP 07 (2017) 091	1704.03878
13	ATLAS Collaboration	Properties of jet fragmentation using charged particles measured with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	PRD 100 (2019) 052011	1906.09254
14	ATLAS Collaboration	Properties of $ \mathrm{g}\rightarrow \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ at small opening angles in $ \mathrm{pp} $ collisions with the ATLAS detector at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	PRD 99 (2019) 052004	1812.09283
15	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of jet fragmentation in 5.02 TeV proton-lead and proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector	NP A 978 (2018) 65	1706.02859
16	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of jet fragmentation in Pb+Pb and pp collisions at $ \sqrt{{s_\mathrm{NN}}} = $ 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC	EPJC 77 (2017) 379	1702.00674
17	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the charged-particle multiplicity inside jets from $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector	EPJC 76 (2016) 322	1602.00988
18	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the jet fragmentation function and transverse profile in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector	EPJC 71 (2011) 1795	1109.5816
19	ATLAS Collaboration	Properties of jets measured from tracks in proton-proton collisions at center-of-mass energy $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector	PRD 84 (2011) 054001	1107.3311
20	CMS Collaboration	Jet shapes of isolated photon-tagged jets in Pb-Pb and pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = $ 5.02 TeV	PRL 122 (2019) 152001	CMS-HIN-18-006 1809.08602
21	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the splitting function in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = $ 5.02 TeV	PRL 120 (2018) 142302	CMS-HIN-16-006 1708.09429
22	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of jet fragmentation in PbPb and pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = $ 2.76 TeV	PRC 90 (2014) 024908	CMS-HIN-12-013 1406.0932
23	CMS Collaboration	Shape, transverse size, and charged hadron multiplicity of jets in pp collisions at 7 TeV	JHEP 06 (2012) 160	CMS-QCD-10-029 1204.3170
24	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of jet fragmentation into charged particles in pp and PbPb collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}= $ 2.76 TeV	JHEP 10 (2012) 087	CMS-HIN-11-004 1205.5872
25	ALICE Collaboration	Exploration of jet substructure using iterative declustering in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at LHC energies	PLB 802 (2020) 135227	1905.02512
26	ALICE Collaboration	Measurement of the production of charm jets tagged with D$ ^{0} $ mesons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{\mathrm{s}}= $ 7 TeV	JHEP 08 (2019) 133	1905.02510
27	ALICE Collaboration	Jet fragmentation transverse momentum measurements from di-hadron correlations in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV pp and $ \sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}} = $ 5.02 TeV p-Pb collisions	JHEP 03 (2019) 169	1811.09742
28	ALICE Collaboration	Charged jet cross section and fragmentation in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV	PRD 99 (2019) 012016	1809.03232
29	LHCb Collaboration	Measurement of charged hadron production in Z-tagged jets in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV	PRL 123 (2019) 232001	1904.08878
30	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the Lund jet plane using charged particles in 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector	PRL 124 (2020) 222002	2004.03540
31	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of soft-drop jet observables in pp collisions with the ATLAS detector at $ \sqrt {s} = $ 13 TeV	PRD 101 (2020) 052007	1912.09837
32	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of jet-substructure observables in top quark, W boson and light jet production in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	JHEP 08 (2019) 033	1903.02942
33	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the jet mass in high transverse momentum $ \mathrm{Z}(\rightarrow \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}})\gamma $ production at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector	PLB 812 (2021) 135991	1907.07093
34	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of colour flow using jet-pull observables in $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ events with the ATLAS experiment at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	EPJC 78 (2018) 847	1805.02935
35	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the soft-drop jet mass in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector	PRL 121 (2018) 092001	1711.08341
36	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of colour flow with the jet pull angle in $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ events using the ATLAS detector at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV	PLB 750 (2015) 475	1506.05629
37	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of jet charge in dijet events from $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector	PRD 93 (2016) 052003	1509.05190
38	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of jet shapes in top-quark pair events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector	EPJC 73 (2013) 2676	1307.5749
39	ATLAS Collaboration	ATLAS measurements of the properties of jets for boosted particle searches	PRD 86 (2012) 072006	1206.5369
40	ATLAS Collaboration	Jet mass and substructure of inclusive jets in $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS experiment	JHEP 05 (2012) 128	1203.4606
41	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of jet substructure observables in $ \mathrm{t\overline{t}} $ events from proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	PRD 98 (2018) 092014	CMS-TOP-17-013 1808.07340
42	CMS Collaboration	Measurements of the differential jet cross section as a function of the jet mass in dijet events from proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	JHEP 11 (2018) 113	CMS-SMP-16-010 1807.05974
43	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the jet mass in highly boosted $ {\mathrm{t}}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ events from pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV	EPJC 77 (2017) 467	CMS-TOP-15-015 1703.06330
44	CMS Collaboration	Measurements of jet charge with dijet events in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV	JHEP 10 (2017) 131	CMS-SMP-15-003 1706.05868
45	CMS Collaboration	Studies of jet mass in dijet and W/Z + jet events	JHEP 05 (2013) 090	CMS-SMP-12-019 1303.4811
46	A. J. Larkoski, J. Thaler, and W. J. Waalewijn	Gaining (mutual) information about quark/gluon discrimination	JHEP 11 (2014) 129	1408.3122
47	J. R. Andersen et al.	Les Houches 2015: Physics at TeV colliders Standard Model working group report	in 9th Les Houches Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders (PhysTeV 2015) Les Houches, France 2015	1605.04692
48	E. Farhi	Quantum chromodynamics test for jets	PRL 39 (1977) 1587
49	CMS Collaboration	Performance of quark/gluon discrimination in 8 TeV pp data	CMS-PAS-JME-13-002	CMS-PAS-JME-13-002
50	CMS Collaboration	Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data	CMS-PAS-JME-16-003	CMS-PAS-JME-16-003
51	ATLAS Collaboration	Light-quark and gluon jet discrimination in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector	EPJC 74 (2014) 3023	1405.6583
52	A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler	Soft drop	JHEP 05 (2014) 146	1402.2657
53	S. Caletti et al.	Jet angularities in Z+jet production at the LHC	JHEP 07 (2021) 076	2104.06920
54	CMS Collaboration	The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC	JINST 3 (2008) S08004	CMS-00-001
55	CMS Collaboration	Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker	JINST 9 (2014) P10009	CMS-TRK-11-001 1405.6569
56	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	The anti-$ {k_{\mathrm{T}}} $ jet clustering algorithm	JHEP 04 (2008) 063	0802.1189
57	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	FastJet user manual	EPJC 72 (2012) 1896	1111.6097
58	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018) P06015	CMS-MUO-16-001 1804.04528
59	CMS Collaboration	Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector	JINST 12 (2017) P10003	CMS-PRF-14-001 1706.04965
60	D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran	Pileup per particle identification	JHEP 10 (2014) 059	1407.6013
61	CMS Collaboration	Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data	JINST 15 (2020) P09018	CMS-JME-18-001 2003.00503
62	CMS Collaboration	Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV	JINST 12 (2017) P02014	CMS-JME-13-004 1607.03663
63	CMS Collaboration	The CMS trigger system	JINST 12 (2017) P01020	CMS-TRG-12-001 1609.02366
64	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	JINST 15 (2020) P10017	CMS-TRG-17-001 2006.10165
65	CMS Collaboration	Performance of the CMS muon trigger system in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV	JINST 16 (2021) P07001	CMS-MUO-19-001 2102.04790
66	J. Alwall et al.	The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations	JHEP 07 (2014) 079	1405.0301
67	T. Sjostrand et al.	An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2	CPC 191 (2015) 159	1410.3012
68	B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman, and T. Sjostrand	Parton fragmentation and string dynamics	PR 97 (1983) 31
69	T. Sjostrand	The merging of jets	PLB 142 (1984) 420
70	J. Alwall et al.	Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions	EPJC 53 (2008) 473	0706.2569
71	P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo	Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune	EPJC 74 (2014) 3024	1404.5630
72	CMS Collaboration	Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements	EPJC 76 (2016) 155	CMS-GEN-14-001 1512.00815
73	M. Bahr et al.	Herwig++ physics and manual	EPJC 58 (2008) 639	0803.0883
74	J. Bellm et al.	Herwig++ 2.7 release note		1310.6877
75	M. H. Seymour and A. Siodmok	Constraining MPI models using $ \sigma_{\mathrm{eff}} $ and recent Tevatron and LHC underlying event data	JHEP 10 (2013) 113	1307.5015
76	S. Gieseke, P. Stephens, and B. Webber	New formalism for QCD parton showers	JHEP 12 (2003) 045	hep-ph/0310083
77	B. R. Webber	A QCD model for jet fragmentation including soft gluon interference	NPB 238 (1984) 492
78	J. M. Lindert et al.	Precise predictions for V+jets dark matter backgrounds	EPJC 77 (2017) 829	1705.04664
79	NNPDF Collaboration	Parton distributions for the LHC Run II	JHEP 04 (2015) 040	1410.8849
80	GEANT4 Collaboration	GEANT4--a simulation toolkit	NIMA 506 (2003) 250
81	CMS Collaboration	Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements	EPJC 80 (2020) 4	CMS-GEN-17-001 1903.12179
82	J. Bellm et al.	Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note	EPJC 76 (2016) 196	1512.01178
83	CMS Collaboration	Development and validation of HERWIG 7 tunes from CMS underlying-event measurements	EPJC 81 (2021) 312	CMS-GEN-19-001 2011.03422
84	Sherpa Collaboration	Event generation with Sherpa 2.2	SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 034	1905.09127
85	F. Krauss, R. Kuhn, and G. Soff	AMEGIC++ 1.0: a matrix element generator in C++	JHEP 02 (2002) 044	hep-ph/0109036
86	T. Gleisberg and S. Hoeche	Comix, a new matrix element generator	JHEP 12 (2008) 039	0808.3674
87	S. Catani, F. Krauss, R. Kuhn, and B. R. Webber	QCD matrix elements+parton showers	JHEP 11 (2001) 063	hep-ph/0109231
88	F. Krauss	Matrix elements and parton showers in hadronic interactions	JHEP 08 (2002) 015	hep-ph/0205283
89	A. Schalicke and F. Krauss	Implementing the ME+PS merging algorithm	JHEP 07 (2005) 018	hep-ph/0503281
90	S. Schumann and F. Krauss	A parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation	JHEP 03 (2008) 038	0709.1027
91	J.-C. Winter, F. Krauss, and G. Soff	A modified cluster hadronization model	EPJC 36 (2004) 381	hep-ph/0311085
92	D. Reichelt, P. Richardson, and A. Siodmok	Improving the simulation of quark and gluon jets with Herwig 7	EPJC 77 (2017) 876	1708.01491
93	M. Rubin, G. P. Salam, and S. Sapeta	Giant QCD k-factors beyond NLO	JHEP 09 (2010) 084	1006.2144
94	A. J. Larkoski, D. Neill, and J. Thaler	Jet shapes with the broadening axis	JHEP 04 (2014) 017	1401.2158
95	Y. L. Dokshitzer, G. D. Leder, S. Moretti, and B. R. Webber	Better jet clustering algorithms	JHEP 08 (1997) 001	hep-ph/9707323
96	M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani, and G. P. Salam	Towards an understanding of jet substructure	JHEP 09 (2013) 029	1307.0007
97	J. M. Butterworth, A. R. Davison, M. Rubin, and G. P. Salam	Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC	PRL 100 (2008) 242001	0802.2470
98	CMS Collaboration	HEPData record for this analysis	HEPData record for this analysis
99	S. Schmitt	TUnfold: an algorithm for correcting migration effects in high energy physics	JINST 7 (2012) T10003	1205.6201
100	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV	JHEP 07 (2018) 161	CMS-FSQ-15-005 1802.02613
101	M. Cacciari et al.	The $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ cross-section at 1.8 TeV and 1.96 TeV: a study of the systematics due to parton densities and scale dependence	JHEP 04 (2004) 068	hep-ph/0303085
102	S. Catani, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, and P. Nason	Soft gluon resummation for Higgs boson production at hadron colliders	JHEP 07 (2003) 028	hep-ph/0306211