CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-TOP-16-019
Bounding the top quark width using final states with two charged leptons and two jets at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A direct bound on the top quark decay width is presented, obtained by analysing 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data collected at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC. The measurement is performed by partially reconstructing the kinematics of top quark candidates from final states containing at least two charged leptons (electrons or muons) and at least two jets, where at least one jet is identified as stemming from the fragmentation and hadronization of a b quark. The observable is compared to the simulated expectations for different top quark width scenarios using a likelihood technique. Under the hypothesis of a standard model-like top quark the measurement yields limits at the 95% CL of 0.6 $ \leq \Gamma_{\rm t} \leq $ 2.5 GeV, with an expected limit at 0.6 $ \leq \Gamma_{\rm t} \leq $ 2.4 GeV for a top quark mass of 172.5 GeV.
Figures Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Distributions of the inclusive lepton-b-jet transverse momentum, $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} (\ell ,\mathrm{ b } )$, for events with $=1$ (left) or $\geq $2 (right) b-tagged jets. All dilepton channels are combined. The top panels compare the distribution in the data to the simulated expectations, while the bottom panels display the ratio of the two. The shaded band in the bottom panel represents the uncertainty in the prediction due to the limited statistics in the simulation and due to the integrated luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Distribution of the inclusive lepton-b-jet transverse momentum, $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} (\ell ,\mathrm{ b } )$, for events with $=1$ b-tagged jet. All dilepton channels are combined. The top panel compares the distribution in the data to the simulated expectations, while the bottom panel displays the ratio of the two. The shaded band in the bottom panel represents the uncertainty in the prediction due to the limited statistics in the simulation and due to the integrated luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Distribution of the inclusive lepton-b-jet transverse momentum, $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} (\ell ,\mathrm{ b } )$, for events with $\geq $2 b-tagged jets. All dilepton channels are combined. The top panel compares the distribution in the data to the simulated expectations, while the bottom panel displays the ratio of the two. The shaded band in the bottom panel represents the uncertainty in the prediction due to the limited statistics in the simulation and due to the integrated luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ observable calculated using up to two leptons and two b-tagged jets per event, for all dilepton channels combined. The plots on the top (bottom) refer to the boosted (non-boosted) category, and the plots on the left (right) correspond to the =1-b ($\geq $2-b ) event category. In each plot the top panels compare the distribution in the data to the simulated expectations, while the bottom panels display the ratio of the two. The last bin includes the overflow of the distributions. The shaded band in the bottom panel represents the uncertainty in the prediction due to the limited statistics in the simulation and due to the integrated luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ observable calculated using up to two leptons and two b-tagged jets per event, for all dilepton channels combined. The plot refers to the boosted category, in the 1-b event category. The top panel compares the distribution in the data to the simulated expectations, while the bottom panel displays the ratio of the two. The last bin includes the overflow of the distributions. The shaded band in the bottom panel represents the uncertainty in the prediction due to the limited statistics in the simulation and due to the integrated luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ observable calculated using up to two leptons and two b-tagged jets per event, for all dilepton channels combined. The plot refers to the boosted category, in the $\geq $2-b event category. The top panel compares the distribution in the data to the simulated expectations, while the bottom panel displays the ratio of the two. The last bin includes the overflow of the distributions. The shaded band in the bottom panel represents the uncertainty in the prediction due to the limited statistics in the simulation and due to the integrated luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ observable calculated using up to two leptons and two b-tagged jets per event, for all dilepton channels combined. The plot refers to the non-boosted category, in the 1-b event category. The top panel compares the distribution in the data to the simulated expectations, while the bottom panel displays the ratio of the two. The last bin includes the overflow of the distributions. The shaded band in the bottom panel represents the uncertainty in the prediction due to the limited statistics in the simulation and due to the integrated luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ observable calculated using up to two leptons and two b-tagged jets per event, for all dilepton channels combined. The plot refers to the non-boosted category, in the $\geq $2-b event category. The top panel compares the distribution in the data to the simulated expectations, while the bottom panel displays the ratio of the two. The last bin includes the overflow of the distributions. The shaded band in the bottom panel represents the uncertainty in the prediction due to the limited statistics in the simulation and due to the integrated luminosity.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ variable for simulated POWHEG+PYTHIA-8 events where the top quark mass is varied by $\pm $3 GeV with respect to 172.5 GeV and the width is varied by a factor of 4 with respect to the SM value. The upper (lower) row of plots describes boosted (unboosted) events, while the left (right) column displays information in the 1-b ($\geq $2-b) category. The top panels show the distributions with the last bin displaying the overflow of the histograms while the bottom plot show the ratio with respect to the $m_\mathrm{ t } =$ 172.5 GeV and $\Gamma _\mathrm{ t } =\Gamma _{\rm SM}$ scenario.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ variable for simulated POWHEG+PYTHIA-8 events where the top quark mass is varied by $\pm $3 GeV with respect to 172.5 GeV and the width is varied by a factor of 4 with respect to the SM value. The plot describes boosted events, in the 1-b category. The top panel shows the distribution with the last bin displaying the overflow of the histograms while the bottom plot shows the ratio with respect to the $m_\mathrm{ t } =$ 172.5 GeV and $\Gamma _\mathrm{ t } =\Gamma _{\rm SM}$ scenario.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ variable for simulated POWHEG+PYTHIA-8 events where the top quark mass is varied by $\pm $3 GeV with respect to 172.5 GeV and the width is varied by a factor of 4 with respect to the SM value. The plot describes boosted events, in the $\geq $2-b category. The top panel shows the distribution with the last bin displaying the overflow of the histograms while the bottom plot shows the ratio with respect to the $m_\mathrm{ t } =$ 172.5 GeV and $\Gamma _\mathrm{ t } =\Gamma _{\rm SM}$ scenario.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ variable for simulated POWHEG+PYTHIA-8 events where the top quark mass is varied by $\pm $3 GeV with respect to 172.5 GeV and the width is varied by a factor of 4 with respect to the SM value. The plot describes unboosted events, in the 1-b category. The top panel shows the distribution with the last bin displaying the overflow of the histograms while the bottom plot shows the ratio with respect to the $m_\mathrm{ t } =$ 172.5 GeV and $\Gamma _\mathrm{ t } =\Gamma _{\rm SM}$ scenario.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Distribution of the $M_{\ell \mathrm{ b } }$ variable for simulated POWHEG+PYTHIA-8 events where the top quark mass is varied by $\pm $3 GeV with respect to 172.5 GeV and the width is varied by a factor of 4 with respect to the SM value. The plot describes unboosted events, in the $\geq $2-b category. The top panel shows the distribution with the last bin displaying the overflow of the histograms while the bottom plot shows the ratio with respect to the $m_\mathrm{ t } =$ 172.5 GeV and $\Gamma _\mathrm{ t } =\Gamma _{\rm SM}$ scenario.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Scan of the likelihood as function of $x$ (the fraction of the alternative width hypothesis) for different top quark width hypothesis. The plot on the left (right) displays the scan expected when $\Gamma _\mathrm{ t } =\Gamma _{\rm SM}$ ($\Gamma _\mathrm{ t } =4 \Gamma _{\rm SM}$) pseudo-data is used. In both cases the result of the fit to $x$ in the data, after profiling $\mu $, is overlaid for comparison.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Scan of the likelihood as function of $x$ (the fraction of the alternative width hypothesis) for different top quark width hypothesis. The plot displays the scan expected when $\Gamma _\mathrm{ t } =\Gamma _{\rm SM}$ pseudo-data is used. The result of the fit to $x$ in the data, after profiling $\mu $, is overlaid for comparison.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Scan of the likelihood as function of $x$ (the fraction of the alternative width hypothesis) for different top quark width hypothesis. The plot displays the scan expected when $\Gamma _\mathrm{ t } =4 \Gamma _{\rm SM}$ pseudo-data is used. The result of the fit to $x$ in the data, after profiling $\mu $, is overlaid for comparison.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Distributions of the test statistic for pseudoexperiments run on the full with two different alternate hypotheses assuming $\Gamma _t = 0.2 \times \Gamma _{\rm SM}$ (left) and $\Gamma _t = 2.6 \times \Gamma _{\rm SM}$ (right). In both cases the distributions are shown when obtained with the pre-fit model at fixed signal strength and when obtained with the post-fit model after profiling the signal strength. The values of the test statistics observed in the data are represented by arrows. In both hypotheses, $m_\mathrm{ t } = $ 172.5 GeV is assumed.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distribution of the test statistic for pseudoexperiments run on the full with two different alternate hypotheses assuming $\Gamma _t = 0.2 \times \Gamma _{\rm SM}$. The distribution is shown when obtained with the pre-fit model at fixed signal strength and when obtained with the post-fit model after profiling the signal strength. The values of the test statistics observed in the data are represented by arrows. In both hypotheses, $m_\mathrm{ t } = $ 172.5 GeV is assumed.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distribution of the test statistic for pseudoexperiments run on the full with two different alternate hypotheses assuming $\Gamma _t = 2.6 \times \Gamma _{\rm SM}$. The distribution is shown when obtained with the pre-fit model at fixed signal strength and when obtained with the post-fit model after profiling the signal strength. The values of the test statistics observed in the data are represented by arrows. In both hypotheses, $m_\mathrm{ t } = $ 172.5 GeV is assumed.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Evolution of the quantiles of the distributions of the test statistics, as a function of the top quark width. The 68%, 95% and 99% CL quantiles are represented by different shades of orange (blue) for the SM (alternative) hypothesis. The plot on the top (bottom) shows the quantiles obtained with the pre-fit (post-fit) model. The values of the test statistics observed in data are represented by the black points in the bottom plot.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Evolution of the quantiles of the distributions of the test statistics, as a function of the top quark width. The 68%, 95% and 99% CL quantiles are represented by different shades of orange (blue) for the SM (alternative) hypothesis. The plot shows the quantiles obtained with the pre-fit model.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Evolution of the quantiles of the distributions of the test statistics, as a function of the top quark width. The 68%, 95% and 99% CL quantiles are represented by different shades of orange (blue) for the SM (alternative) hypothesis. The plot shows the quantiles obtained with the post-fit model. The values of the test statistics observed in data are represented by the black points in the bottom plot.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Evolution of the CL$_{\rm S}$ as a function of the top quark width. The derived limits at the 95% (99%) confidence level are represented as the intersection of the fits to the line at CL$_{\rm S}= $ 0.05 (0.01). The expectations from both the pre-fit and post-fit models are represented by means of a best-fit spline curve.
Summary
We have presented limits on the top quark width using 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment. Using $\mathrm{ t \bar{t} }$ and $\mathrm{t }\mathrm{ W }$ decay events with two charged leptons in the final state, we reconstruct the $M_{\ell\mathrm{b }}$ observable inclusively using up to two jets identified as stemming from the fragmentation and hadronization of a $\mathrm{b }$ quark. The observable is fit for deviations of the width with respect to the SM prediction. Different event categories are included in the fit to improve the sensitivity of the measurement and partially constraint some of the uncertainties. Binary hypothesis tests are then used to bound an SM-like top quark width to 0.6 $ \leq \Gamma_\mathrm{t } \leq $ 2.5 GeV at the 95% CL, with corresponding expected bounds of 0.6 $ \leq \Gamma_\mathrm{t } \leq $ 2.4 GeV for $m_\mathrm{t }= $ 172.5 GeV. This constitutes the first such direct measurement at the LHC and the most precise direct bound of the top quark width performed to date.
References
1 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the top quark mass using proton-proton data at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV PRD 93 (Apr, 2016) 072004
2 C. P. Yuan A new method to detect a heavy top quark at the Tevatron PRD 41 (1990) 42
3 D0 Collaboration An improved determination of the width of the top quark PRD85 (2012) 091104 1201.4156
4 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the ratio $ \mathcal B(\mathrm{t } \to \mathrm{ W }\mathrm{b })/\mathcal B(\mathrm{t } \to \mathrm{ W }\mathrm{c}) $ in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV Phys. Lett.B 736 (2014) 33 CMS-TOP-12-035
1404.2292
5 CDF Collaboration Direct measurement of the total decay width of the top quark PRL 111 (2013), no. 20, 202001 1308.4050
6 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2015 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
7 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
8 M. Czakon and A. Mitov Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 2930 1112.5675
9 N. Kidonakis Top quark production in Proceedings, Helmholtz International Summer School on Physics of Heavy Quarks and Hadrons (HQ 2013): JINR, Dubna, Russia, 2013 1311.0283
10 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
11 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
12 E. Re Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 1009.2450
13 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026 hep-ph/0603175
14 T. Sj\"ostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
15 F. Demartin et al. The impact of PDF and alphas uncertainties on Higgs Production in gluon fusion at hadron colliders PRD 82 (2010) 1004.0962
16 CMS Collaboration Underlying event tunes and double parton scattering CDS
17 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune EPJC 74 (2014), no. 8 1404.5630
18 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 116 (2016) CMS-TOP-15-003
1510.05302
19 J. Allison et al. Geant4 developments and applications IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270
20 CMS Collaboration Identification of $ \mathrm{b } $ quark jets at the CMS Experiment in the LHC Run 2 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001
21 CMS Collaboration Measurement of particle level differential ttbar cross sections in the dilepton channel at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-007 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-007
22 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive and differential $ \mathrm{ t \bar{t} } $ production cross sections in lepton + jets final states at 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-008 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-008
23 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross section for $ \mathrm{t \bar t} $ production in the dilepton final state at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011 CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011
24 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the top-quark mass in the $ \mathrm{ t \bar{t} } $ dileptonic channel using the $ M_{\mathrm{b },\ell} $, $ M_{T2} $, and $ M_{\mathrm{b }\ell\nu} $ observables CMS-PAS-TOP-15-008 CMS-PAS-TOP-15-008
25 A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit, and S. Pozzorini NLO QCD corrections to $ \mathrm{ W }\mathrm{ W }\mathrm{b }\mathrm{b } $ production at hadron colliders PRL 106 (2011) 052001 1012.3975
26 G. Bevilacqua et al. Complete off-shell effects in top quark pair hadroproduction with leptonic decay at next-to-leading order JHEP 02 (2011) 083 1012.4230
27 A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit, and S. Pozzorini NLO QCD corrections to off-shell top-antitop production with leptonic decays at hadron colliders JHEP 10 (2012) 110 1207.5018
28 F. Cascioli, S. Kallweit, P. Maierhöfer, and S. Pozzorini A unified NLO description of top-pair and associated $ \mathrm{ W }\mathrm{t } $ production EPJC 74 (2014), no. 3 1312.0546
29 R. Frederix Top Quark Induced Backgrounds to Higgs Production in the $ \mathrm{ W }\mathrm{ W }^{(*)}\to \ell\ell\nu\nu $ Decay Channel at Next-to-Leading-Order in QCD PRL 112 (2014), no. 8, 082002 1311.4893
30 G. Heinrich et al. NLO QCD corrections to $ \mathrm{ W }^{+}\mathrm{ W }^{-}b\bar{b} $ production with leptonic decays in the light of top quark mass and asymmetry measurements JHEP 06 (2014) 158 1312.6659
31 M. V. Garzelli, A. Kardos, and Z. Trócsanyi Hadroproduction of $ \mathrm{ W }^{+} \mathrm{ W }^{-} \mathrm{b } \bar{\mathrm{b }} $ at NLO accuracy matched with shower Monte Carlo programs JHEP 08 (2014) 069 1405.5859
32 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, P. Nason, and E. Re Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers JHEP 04 (2015) 114 1412.1828
33 CMS Collaboration Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS d JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
34 CMS Collaboration Performance of muon identification in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV CDS
35 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV CDS
36 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the $ \mathrm{ \mathrm{ t \bar{t} } } $ production cross section in the $ \mathrm{ e }\mu $ channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2016) 029 CMS-TOP-13-004
1603.02303
37 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV Submitted to: JINST (2016) CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
38 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential cross section for top quark pair production in $ \mathrm{ p }\mathrm{ p } $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 8 $ TeV EPJC 75 (2015), no. 11, 542 CMS-TOP-12-028
1505.04480
39 S. Frixione et al. Single-top hadroproduction in association with a $ \mathrm{ W } $ boson JHEP 07 (2008) 029 0805.3067
40 A. S. Belyaev, E. E. Boos, and L. V. Dudko Single top quark at future hadron colliders: complete signal and background study PRD 59 (1999) 075001 hep-ph/9806332
41 C. D. White, S. Frixione, E. Laenen, and F. Maltoni Isolating $ \mathrm{ W }\mathrm{t } $ production at the LHC JHEP 11 (2009) 074 0908.0631
42 T. M. P. Tait The $ \mathrm{t }\mathrm{ W } $$ ^{-} $ mode of single top production PRD 61 (1999) 034001 hep-ph/9909352
43 CMS Collaboration Combination of standard model Higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005 CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN