CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SUS-16-026
Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in the WH final state at 13 TeV
Abstract: A search is performed for beyond the standard model physics in events with a leptonically-decaying W boson, a Higgs boson decaying to a pair of b-quarks, and missing transverse energy, using 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ of data recorded by CMS in 2016 at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV. This signature is predicted to occur, for example, in supersymmetric models from electroweak production of gauginos. The observed data are in agreement with the standard model prediction. The results are used to set cross section limits on chargino-neutralino production in a simplified model of supersymmetry with the decays $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \rightarrow W \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ and $\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} \rightarrow H \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Tables References CMS Publications
Additional information on efficiencies needed for reinterpretation of these results are available here.
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Feynman diagram of the SUSY simplified model targeted by this analysis: chargino-neutralino production with the chargino decaying to the W boson and the LSP, while the second neutralino decays to the Higgs boson and the LSP.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Distributions of ${M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}$ (a), ${ {E_\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}}$ (b), ${M_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (c), and ${M_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ (bottom right) for signal and background events in simulation after the preselection. The ${ {E_\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}}$, ${M_{\mathrm {T}}}$, and ${M_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ distributions are shown after the 90 $ < {M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}} < $ 150 GeV requirement. Signal distributions are also overlaid as open histograms for various mass points. The legend entries for signal give the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{\pm }}, m_{ {\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{0}}})$ and the amount by which the signal cross section has been scaled for display purposes.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Distributions of ${M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}$ (a), ${ {E_\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}}$ (b), ${M_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (c), and ${M_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ (bottom right) for signal and background events in simulation after the preselection. The ${ {E_\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}}$, ${M_{\mathrm {T}}}$, and ${M_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ distributions are shown after the 90 $ < {M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}} < $ 150 GeV requirement. Signal distributions are also overlaid as open histograms for various mass points. The legend entries for signal give the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{\pm }}, m_{ {\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{0}}})$ and the amount by which the signal cross section has been scaled for display purposes.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Distributions of ${M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}$ (a), ${ {E_\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}}$ (b), ${M_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (c), and ${M_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ (bottom right) for signal and background events in simulation after the preselection. The ${ {E_\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}}$, ${M_{\mathrm {T}}}$, and ${M_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ distributions are shown after the 90 $ < {M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}} < $ 150 GeV requirement. Signal distributions are also overlaid as open histograms for various mass points. The legend entries for signal give the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{\pm }}, m_{ {\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{0}}})$ and the amount by which the signal cross section has been scaled for display purposes.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
Distributions of ${M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}$ (a), ${ {E_\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}}$ (b), ${M_{\mathrm {T}}}$ (c), and ${M_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ (bottom right) for signal and background events in simulation after the preselection. The ${ {E_\mathrm {T}}^{\mathrm {miss}}}$, ${M_{\mathrm {T}}}$, and ${M_{\mathrm {CT}}}$ distributions are shown after the 90 $ < {M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}} < $ 150 GeV requirement. Signal distributions are also overlaid as open histograms for various mass points. The legend entries for signal give the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{\pm }}, m_{ {\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{0}}})$ and the amount by which the signal cross section has been scaled for display purposes.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
(a) Distribution of ${M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}$ in ${\mathrm {CR}2\ell }$ after preselection requirements, comparing data to MC simulation. (b) Distribution of ${M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}$ in ${\mathrm {CRMb}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}$ after preselection requirements.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
(a) Distribution of ${M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}$ in ${\mathrm {CR}2\ell }$ after preselection requirements, comparing data to MC simulation. (b) Distribution of ${M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}$ in ${\mathrm {CRMb}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}$ after preselection requirements.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Distribution of ${M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}$ after all signal region kinematic requirements. The signal region corresponds to the bins with 90 $ < {M_{\mathrm {b}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}}< $ 150 GeV. The hatched band shows the total uncertainty on the background prediction, including statistical and systematic components. The signal distribution for a reference mass point is overlaid as an open histogram, and the legend entry for signal gives the masses $(m_{\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{\pm }}, m_{ {\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{0}}})$.

png pdf root
Figure 5:
Expected and observed cross section limits at the 95% CL as a function of the chargino mass, where the LSP is assumed to have a mass of 1 GeV. The NLO theoretical cross section for production of $\tilde{\chi }_{1}^{\pm }\tilde{\chi }_{2}^{0}$ is also shown, assuming these are pure wino states.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Control region selections compared with the signal region.

png pdf
Table 2:
Predicted and observed yields for ${\mathrm {CRMb}\bar{\mathrm {b}}}$ after the signal region requirements on ${E_{\mathrm {T}}^{\text {miss}}} $, ${M_{\mathrm {T}}}$, and ${M_{\mathrm {CT}}}$. The observed data yield is compared to the MC prediction for the dilepton top quark background after subtracting the predictions for the other (non-dilepton top quark) backgrounds. The uncertainties shown are statistical only, and the uncertainty on the ratio includes the statistical uncertainty on the data and MC samples.

png pdf
Table 3:
Yields for ${\mathrm {CR}0\mathrm {b}}$, after all signal region requirements, including $ {M_{\mathrm {T}}}> $ 150 GeV. The observed data yield is compared to the W+light-jets MC prediction after subtracting the prediction for the other (non W+light-jets) backgrounds from the data yield. The uncertainties shown are statistical only, and the uncertainty on the ratio includes the statistical uncertainty on the data and MC samples.

png pdf
Table 4:
Expected and observed yields in the signal region. The expected yields for some example signal points are also given. The uncertainties include both statistical and systematic sources.

png pdf
Table 5:
Sources of systematic uncertainty on the estimated signal yield along with their typical values. The ranges represent variation across the signal masses probed.
Summary
A search was performed for beyond the standard model physics in events with a leptonically-decaying W boson, a Higgs boson decaying to a $\mathrm{ b \bar{b} }$ pair, and $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}}$, using 12.9 fb$^{-1}$ of data recorded by CMS in 2016 at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV. The observed data are in agreement with the standard model expectation. The results were used to set cross section limits on chargino-neutralino production in a simplified SUSY model with the decays $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \to\mathrm{ W }{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ and $\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}\to\mathrm{ H }{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$.
Additional Tables

png pdf
Additional Table 1:
Cutflow yields for the signal $\mathrm{ pp \rightarrow \tilde{\chi }_{1}^{\pm } \tilde{\chi }_{2}^{0} }$ with the decays $\mathrm{ \tilde{\chi }_{1}^{\pm } \rightarrow W \tilde{\chi }_{1}^{0} }$ and $\mathrm{ \tilde{\chi }_{2}^{0} \rightarrow H \tilde{\chi }_{1}^{0} }$. The ``All events'' category below starts from all generated events where the W boson decays leptonically and the Higgs boson decays to a ${\mathrm{ b \bar{b} } } $ pair.
References
1 P. Ramond Dual theory for free fermions PRD 3 (1971) 2415
2 Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman Extension of the algebra of Poincar$ \'e $ group generators and violation of P invariance JEPTL 13 (1971)323
3 A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz Factorizable dual model of pions Nucl. Phys. B 31 (1971) 86
4 D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov Possible universal neutrino interaction JEPTL 16 (1972)438
5 J. Wess and B. Zumino A Lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations PLB 49 (1974) 52
6 J. Wess and B. Zumino Supergauge transformations in four dimensions Nucl. Phys. B 70 (1974) 39
7 P. Fayet Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino Nucl. Phys. B 90 (1975) 104
8 H. P. Nilles Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics Phys. Rep. 110 (1984) 1
9 C. Boehm et al. Light Scalar Top Quarks and Supersymmetric Dark Matter PRD 62 (2000) 035012 hep-ph/9911496
10 C. Bal\'azs et al. Dark Matter, Light Stops and Electroweak Baryogenesis PRD 70 (2004) 015007 hep-ph/403224
11 CMS Collaboration Searches for electroweak neutralino and chargino production in channels with Higgs, Z, and W bosons in pp collisions at 8 TeV PRD 90 (2014), no. 9, 092007 CMS-SUS-14-002
1409.3168
12 CMS Collaboration Searches for electroweak production of charginos, neutralinos, and sleptons decaying to leptons and W, Z, and Higgs bosons in pp collisions at 8 TeV EPJC 74 (2014), no. 9 CMS-SUS-13-006
1405.7570
13 ATLAS Collaboration Search for the electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in $ \sqrt{s} $=8 TeV $ pp $ collisions with the ATLAS detector PRD 93 (2016), no. 5, 052002 1509.07152
14 N. Arkani-Hamed et al. MARMOSET: The path from LHC data to the new standard model via on-shell effective theories hep-ph/0703088
15 J. Alwall, P. Schuster, and N. Toro Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC PRD 79 (2009) 075020 0810.3921
16 J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti, and J. G. Wacker Model-independent jets plus missing energy searches PRD 79 (2009) 015005 0809.3264
17 D. Alves et al. Simplified models for LHC new physics searches JPG 39 (2012) 105005 1105.2838
18 CMS Collaboration Interpretation of searches for supersymmetry with simplified models PRD 88 (2013) 052017 CMS-SUS-11-016
1301.2175
19 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CDS
20 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the particle-flow event with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
21 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 8 $~TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
22 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
23 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
24 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_\mathrm{T} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
25 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet User Manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
26 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
27 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
28 CMS Collaboration Missing transverse energy performance of the CMS detector JINST 6 (2011) P09001 CMS-JME-10-009
1106.5048
29 D. R. Tovey On measuring the masses of pair-produced semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders JHEP 04 (2008) 034 0802.2879
30 G. Polesello and D. R. Tovey Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with the boost-corrected contransverse mass JHEP 03 (2010) 030 0910.0174
31 J. Alwall et al. $ MadGraph $ 5: going beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
32 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
33 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the $ POWHEG $ method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
34 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the $ POWHEG $ BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
35 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
36 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
37 \GEANTfour Collaboration Geant 4 -- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
38 S. Abdullin et al. The fast simulation of the CMS detector at LHC J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032049
39 CMS Collaboration Search for direct top squark pair production in the single lepton final state at $ \sqrt{s}=13 \mathrm{TeV} $ CMS-PAS-SUS-16-002 CMS-PAS-SUS-16-002
40 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the WZ production cross section in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV CMS-PAS-SMP-16-002 CMS-PAS-SMP-16-002
41 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The CL$ _\mathrm{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
42 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
43 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
44 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
45 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Gaugino production in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2012) 081 1207.2159
46 B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering Precision predictions for electroweak superpartner production at hadron colliders with Resummino EPJC 73 (2013) 2480 1304.0790
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN