CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-EXO-18-004
Search for excited leptons in the $\ell\ell\gamma$ final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A search is presented for excited electrons and muons using a data sample of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV, collected with the CMS detector in 2016 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. This is the first search in the $\ell\ell\gamma$ final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV. The observed data are consistent with the standard model prediction, and exclusion limits on the excited lepton mass and the compositeness scale are set. Excited electrons (muons) with a mass below 3.9 (3.8) TeV are excluded under the assumption that the excited lepton mass equals the compositeness scale. The best observed limit on the compositeness scale is obtained in the mass range between 0.5 and 1.0 TeV, excluding a compositeness scale below 25 TeV for both excited electrons and muons. These are the most stringent limits to date in the $\ell\ell\gamma$ final state.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ (left panel) and ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ (right panel) in the $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}\gamma $ channel (upper panel) and the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}\gamma $ channel (lower panel). The black dots denote the data points. The green, yellow, red and blue histograms correspond to the prediction of Z$\gamma $, the jet background, $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} \gamma $, and triboson processes, respectively. The dotted lines represents ${\ell ^*}$ signal events for $ {M_{\ell ^*}} = $ 1 TeV at $\lambda = $ 10 TeV.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ (left panel) and ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ (right panel) in the $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}\gamma $ channel (upper panel) and the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}\gamma $ channel (lower panel). The black dots denote the data points. The green, yellow, red and blue histograms correspond to the prediction of Z$\gamma $, the jet background, $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} \gamma $, and triboson processes, respectively. The dotted lines represents ${\ell ^*}$ signal events for $ {M_{\ell ^*}} = $ 1 TeV at $\lambda = $ 10 TeV.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ (left panel) and ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ (right panel) in the $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}\gamma $ channel (upper panel) and the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}\gamma $ channel (lower panel). The black dots denote the data points. The green, yellow, red and blue histograms correspond to the prediction of Z$\gamma $, the jet background, $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} \gamma $, and triboson processes, respectively. The dotted lines represents ${\ell ^*}$ signal events for $ {M_{\ell ^*}} = $ 1 TeV at $\lambda = $ 10 TeV.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
The distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ (left panel) and ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ (right panel) in the $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}\gamma $ channel (upper panel) and the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}\gamma $ channel (lower panel). The black dots denote the data points. The green, yellow, red and blue histograms correspond to the prediction of Z$\gamma $, the jet background, $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} \gamma $, and triboson processes, respectively. The dotted lines represents ${\ell ^*}$ signal events for $ {M_{\ell ^*}} = $ 1 TeV at $\lambda = $ 10 TeV.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
The distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ (left panel) and ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ (right panel) in the $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}\gamma $ channel (upper panel) and the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}\gamma $ channel (lower panel). The black dots denote the data points. The green, yellow, red and blue histograms correspond to the prediction of Z$\gamma $, the jet background, $ {{\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}} \gamma $, and triboson processes, respectively. The dotted lines represents ${\ell ^*}$ signal events for $ {M_{\ell ^*}} = $ 1 TeV at $\lambda = $ 10 TeV.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The two dimensional distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ versus ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ of excited electrons with a mass of 500 GeV (left) and of excited muons with a mass of 750 GeV (right), respectively, after event selection. The red dashed lines denote the boundary of the L-shaped search window for each mass point.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The two dimensional distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ versus ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ of excited electrons with a mass of 500 GeV (left) and of excited muons with a mass of 750 GeV (right), respectively, after event selection. The red dashed lines denote the boundary of the L-shaped search window for each mass point.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The two dimensional distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ versus ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ of excited electrons with a mass of 500 GeV (left) and of excited muons with a mass of 750 GeV (right), respectively, after event selection. The red dashed lines denote the boundary of the L-shaped search window for each mass point.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The two dimensional distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ versus ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ of Z$\gamma $ background events in the $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}\gamma $ channel (left) and in the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}\gamma $ channel (right), respectively, after event selection.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The two dimensional distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ versus ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ of Z$\gamma $ background events in the $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}\gamma $ channel (left) and in the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}\gamma $ channel (right), respectively, after event selection.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The two dimensional distributions of ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {min}}$ versus ${M_{\ell \gamma}^\text {max}}$ of Z$\gamma $ background events in the $ {\mathrm {e}} {\mathrm {e}}\gamma $ channel (left) and in the $ {{\mu}} {{\mu}}\gamma $ channel (right), respectively, after event selection.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction (left panel) and lower limits on the compositeness scale (right panel) as a function of signal mass ${M_{\ell ^*}}$, together with the 68% (green) and 95% (yellow) CL ranges of the expected limit for the background-only hypothesis, for ${{\mathrm {e}}^*}$ (upper panel) and ${{{\mu}}^*}$ (lower panel).

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction (left panel) and lower limits on the compositeness scale (right panel) as a function of signal mass ${M_{\ell ^*}}$, together with the 68% (green) and 95% (yellow) CL ranges of the expected limit for the background-only hypothesis, for ${{\mathrm {e}}^*}$ (upper panel) and ${{{\mu}}^*}$ (lower panel).

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction (left panel) and lower limits on the compositeness scale (right panel) as a function of signal mass ${M_{\ell ^*}}$, together with the 68% (green) and 95% (yellow) CL ranges of the expected limit for the background-only hypothesis, for ${{\mathrm {e}}^*}$ (upper panel) and ${{{\mu}}^*}$ (lower panel).

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction (left panel) and lower limits on the compositeness scale (right panel) as a function of signal mass ${M_{\ell ^*}}$, together with the 68% (green) and 95% (yellow) CL ranges of the expected limit for the background-only hypothesis, for ${{\mathrm {e}}^*}$ (upper panel) and ${{{\mu}}^*}$ (lower panel).

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section and branching fraction (left panel) and lower limits on the compositeness scale (right panel) as a function of signal mass ${M_{\ell ^*}}$, together with the 68% (green) and 95% (yellow) CL ranges of the expected limit for the background-only hypothesis, for ${{\mathrm {e}}^*}$ (upper panel) and ${{{\mu}}^*}$ (lower panel).
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties (in %) in the signal yield, the prompt photon background prediction, and the jet background prediction.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the observed (expected) lower limits on ${M_{\ell ^*}}$, assuming ${M_{\ell ^*}} = \lambda $, and the best observed (expected) lower limits on $\lambda $ in the mass range 0.5-1.0 TeV.
Summary
A search is presented for excited electrons and muons using a data sample of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV, collected with the CMS detector in 2016 and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. This is the first search in the $\ell\ell\gamma$ final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV. The observed data are consistent with the standard model prediction, and exclusion limits on the excited lepton mass and the compositeness scale are set. Excited electrons (muons) with a mass below 3.9 (3.8) TeV are excluded under the assumption that the excited lepton mass equals the compositeness scale. The best observed limit on the compositeness scale is obtained in the mass range between 0.5 and 1.0 TeV, excluding a compositeness scale below 25 TeV for both excited electrons and muons. These are the most stringent limits to date in the $\ell\ell\gamma$ final state.
References
1 J. C. Pati, A. Salam, and J. A. Strathdee Are quarks composite? PLB 59 (1975) 265
2 H. Terazawa, M. Yasu\`e, K. Akama, and M. Hayshi Observable effects of the possible substructure of leptons and quarks PLB 112 (1982) 387
3 M. Abolins et al. Testing the Compositeness of Quarks and Leptons in Elementary Particles and Future Facilities (Snowmass 1982), p. 274 1982eConf C8206282
4 E. Eichten, K. D. Lane, and M. E. Peskin New Tests for Quark and Lepton Substructure PRL 50 (1983) 811
5 H. Harari Composite models for quarks and leptons Physics Reports 104 (1984) 159
6 K. D. Lane, F. E. Paige, T. Skwarnicki, and W. J. Womersley Simulations of supercollider physics PR 278 (1997) 291 hep-ph/9412280
7 U. Baur, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Excited quark and lepton production at hadron colliders PRD 42 (1990) 815
8 O. W. Greenberg and C. A. Nelson Composite models of leptons PRD 10 (1974) 2567
9 O. W. Greenberg and J. Sucher A quantum structure dynamic model of quarks, leptons, weak vector bosons, and Higgs mesons PLB 99 (1981) 339
10 S. Bhattacharya, S. S. Chauhan, B. C. Choudhary, and D. Choudhury Search for excited quarks in $ q\overline{q} {\rightarrow} {\gamma} {\gamma} $ at the cern lhc PRD 76 (2007) 115017
11 S. Bhattacharya, S. S. Chauhan, B. C. Choudhary, and D. Choudhury Quark Excitations Through the Prism of Direct Photon Plus Jet at the LHC PRD 80 (2009) 015014 0901.3927
12 CMS Collaboration Search for excited leptons in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV Phys.Lett. B720 (2013) 309--329 CMS-EXO-11-034
1210.2422
13 CMS Collaboration Search for excited leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8~TeV JHEP 03 (2016) 125 CMS-EXO-14-015
1511.01407
14 ALEPH Collaboration Search for excited leptons at 130--140 GeV PLB 385 (1996) 445
15 DELPHI Collaboration Search for composite and exotic fermions at LEP 2 EPJC 8 (1999) 41 hep-ex/9811005
16 OPAL Collaboration Search for unstable heavy and excited leptons at LEP 2 EPJC 14 (2000) 73 hep-ex/0001056
17 L3 Collaboration Search for excited leptons at LEP PLB 568 (2003) 23 hep-ex/0306016
18 H1 Collaboration Search for excited electrons in $ ep $ collisions at HERA PLB 666 (2008) 131 0805.4530
19 CDF Collaboration Search for Excited and Exotic Electrons in the $ e\gamma $ Decay Channel in $ \rm {p}\overline{\rm p} $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRL 94 (2005) 101802 hep-ex/0410013
20 CDF Collaboration Search for Excited and Exotic Muons in the $ \mu\gamma $ Decay Channel in $ \rm {p}\overline{\rm p} $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRL 97 (2006) 191802 hep-ex/0606043
21 D0 Collaboration Search for excited muons in $ {p}\overline{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 73 (2006) 111102 hep-ex/0604040
22 D0 Collaboration Search for excited electrons in $ {p}\overline{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 77 (2008) 091102 0801.0877
23 ATLAS Collaboration Search for excited leptons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7~TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 85 (2012) 072003 1201.3293
24 ATLAS Collaboration Search for excited electrons and muons in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8~TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 093011 1308.1364
25 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
26 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
27 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 CPC 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
28 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
29 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
30 S. Majhi QCD corrections to excited lepton (pair) production at the LHC PRD 88 (2013), no. 7, 074028 1210.8307
31 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
32 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the cms detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
33 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
34 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
35 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Submitted to JINST CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
36 CMS Collaboration Electron and Photon performance using data collected by CMS at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV and 25ns CDS
37 CMS Collaboration Performance of Photon Reconstruction and Identification with the CMS Detector in Proton-Proton Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015), no. 08, P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
38 CMS Collaboration Search for high-mass resonances in dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 06 (2018) 120 CMS-EXO-16-047
1803.06292
39 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data-taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
40 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
41 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the LHC higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
42 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
43 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002), no. 10
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN