CMS-PAS-TOP-17-008

CMS-PAS-TOP-17-008
Measurement of the top quark mass in the all-jets final state at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV
CMS Collaboration
July 2018

Abstract: A top quark mass measurement is performed using 35.9 fb $^{-1}$ of LHC proton-proton collision data collected with the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV in 2016. The measurement uses the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}$ all-jets final state, which comprises a total of six jets. A kinematic fit is performed to reconstruct the decay of the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}$ system and suppress QCD multijet background. By means of the ideogram method, the top quark mass is determined, simultaneously constraining an additional jet energy scale factor (JSF). The result of 172.34 $\pm$ 0.20 (stat+JSF) $\pm$ 0.76 (syst) GeV for the top quark mass is in good agreement with previous measurements in the same and different final states.
Links: CDS record (PDF) ; CADI line (restricted) ; These preliminary results are superseded in this paper, EPJC 79 (2019) 313. The superseded preliminary plots can be found here.

Figures & Tables	Summary	References	CMS Publications

Figures
png pdf	Figure 1: The ${\Delta R({\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}})}$ (left) and ${P_\text {gof}}$ (right) distributions of data compared to signal simulation and the multijet background estimate. The hashed bands represent the total uncertainty of the prediction.
png pdf	Figure 1-a: The ${\Delta R({\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}})}$ (left) and ${P_\text {gof}}$ (right) distributions of data compared to signal simulation and the multijet background estimate. The hashed bands represent the total uncertainty of the prediction.
png pdf	Figure 1-b: The ${\Delta R({\mathrm {b}} {\overline {\mathrm {b}}})}$ (left) and ${P_\text {gof}}$ (right) distributions of data compared to signal simulation and the multijet background estimate. The hashed bands represent the total uncertainty of the prediction.
png pdf	Figure 2: The fitted top quark mass (left) and reconstructed W boson mass (right) distributions of data compared to signal simulation and the multijet background estimate. The shown reconstructed W boson mass is the average of both W bosons in the event. The hashed bands represent the total uncertainty of the prediction.
png pdf	Figure 2-a: The fitted top quark mass (left) and reconstructed W boson mass (right) distributions of data compared to signal simulation and the multijet background estimate. The shown reconstructed W boson mass is the average of both W bosons in the event. The hashed bands represent the total uncertainty of the prediction.
png pdf	Figure 2-b: The fitted top quark mass (left) and reconstructed W boson mass (right) distributions of data compared to signal simulation and the multijet background estimate. The shown reconstructed W boson mass is the average of both W bosons in the event. The hashed bands represent the total uncertainty of the prediction.
png pdf	Figure 3: Difference of extracted and generated top quark masses and JSFs for different input masses and JSFs after the calibration.

Tables
png pdf	Table 1: List of systematic uncertainties for the all-jets channel. The signs of the shifts correspond to the $+1$ standard deviation variation of the systematic uncertainty source. For linear sums of uncertainty groups, the relative signs have been considered.

Summary

In this study, a measurement of the top quark mass using events with at least six jets in the final state has been presented. The analyzed data was collected with the CMS experiment in pp collisions at

$\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV. This data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb

$^{-1}$ and contains 10799 candidate events after the event selection. The kinematic properties in each event are reconstructed using a constrained fit, assuming a

$\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ hypothesis, which allowed to suppress the dominant QCD multijet background and improve the mass resolution.

The top quark mass and an additional jet energy scale factor were extracted using the ideogram method, which uses the likelihood of the top quark mass and jet scale factor in each event to determine these parameters. The resulting top quark mass is measured to be 172.34

$\pm$ 0.20 (stat+JSF)

$\pm$ 0.43 (CR+ERD)

$\pm$ 0.63 (syst) GeV = 172.34

$\pm$ 0.20 (stat+JSF)

$\pm$ 0.76 (syst) GeV. This is in good agreement with the previous CMS results at

$\sqrt{s} =$ 7 and 8 TeV [8], as well as with the result in the lepton+jets channel at

$\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV [11]. The quoted modeling uncertainties are increased with respect to previous results at lower center-of-mass energies due to the utilization of alternative color-reconnection models which have not been available previously.

References
1	Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, CDF, DELPHI, SLD Electroweak and Heavy Flavour Groups, ALEPH, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD, OPAL, D0, L3 Collaboration	Precision Electroweak Measurements and Constraints on the Standard Model		1012.2367
2	M. Baak et al.	The Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model after the Discovery of a New Boson at the LHC	EPJC 72 (2012) 2205	1209.2716
3	M. Baak et al.	The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC	EPJC 74 (2014) 3046	1407.3792
4	G. Degrassi et al.	Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO	JHEP 08 (2012) 1	1205.6497
5	F. Bezrukov, M. Y. Kalmykov, B. A. Kniehl, and M. Shaposhnikov	Higgs boson mass and new physics	JHEP 10 (2012) 140	1205.2893
6	DELPHI Collaboration	Measurement of the mass and width of the W boson in ${\rm e}^{+}{\rm e}^{-}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 161 -- 209 GeV	EPJC 55 (2008) 1	0803.2534
7	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the top-quark mass in $t\bar{t}$ events with lepton+jets final states in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 7 TeV	JHEP 12 (2012) 105	CMS-TOP-11-015 1209.2319
8	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the top quark mass using proton-proton data at ${\sqrt{s}} =$ 7 and 8 TeV	PRD 93 (2016) 072004	CMS-TOP-14-022 1509.04044
9	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the top-quark mass in the fully hadronic decay channel from ATLAS data at $\sqrt{s}=7\mathrm{ TeV}$	EPJC 75 (2015) 158	1409.0832
10	ATLAS Collaboration	Measurement of the top quark mass in the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}\to$ dilepton channel from $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV ATLAS data	PLB 761 (2016) 350	1606.02179
11	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the top quark mass with lepton+jets final states using pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	Submitted to \it EPJC	CMS-TOP-17-007 1805.01428
12	CMS Collaboration	Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector	JINST 12 (2017) P10003	CMS-PRF-14-001 1706.04965
13	M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam	Dispelling the $N^{3}$ myth for the $k_{\rm t}$ jet-finder	PLB 641 (2006) 57	hep-ph/0512210
14	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	The anti- $k_t$ jet clustering algorithm	JHEP 04 (2008) 063	0802.1189
15	M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez	FastJet user manual	EPJC 72 (2012) 1896	1111.6097
16	CMS Collaboration	Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV	JINST 13 (2018), no. 05, P05011	CMS-BTV-16-002 1712.07158
17	P. Nason	A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms	JHEP 11 (2004) 040	hep-ph/0409146
18	S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari	Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the $POWHEG$ method	JHEP 11 (2007) 070	0709.2092
19	S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re	A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the $POWHEG$ BOX	JHEP 06 (2010) 043	1002.2581
20	J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, P. Nason, and E. Re	Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers	JHEP 04 (2015) 114	1412.1828
21	NNPDF Collaboration	Parton distributions for the LHC Run II	JHEP 04 (2015) 040	1410.8849
22	T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands	A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1	CPC 178 (2008) 852	0710.3820
23	P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo	Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune	EPJC 74 (2014) 3024	1404.5630
24	CMS Collaboration	Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in $PYTHIA 8$ in the modelling of $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}$ at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 and 13 TeV	CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021	CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021
25	GEANT4 Collaboration	GEANT4---a simulation toolkit	NIMA 506 (2003) 250
26	M. Czakon and A. Mitov	Top++: A Program for the Calculation of the Top-Pair Cross-Section at Hadron Colliders	CPC 185 (2014) 2930	1112.5675
27	CMS Collaboration	Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV	JINST 12 (2017) P02014	CMS-JME-13-004 1607.03663
28	ATLAS and CMS Collaborations	Jet energy scale uncertainty correlations between ATLAS and CMS at 8 TeV	ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-049, CMS-PAS-JME-15-001, CERN
29	T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands	PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual	JHEP 05 (2006) 026	hep-ph/0603175
30	M. Bahr et al.	Herwig++ physics and manual	EPJC 58 (2008) 639	0803.0883
31	DELPHI Collaboration	A study of the b-quark fragmentation function with the DELPHI detector at LEP I and an averaged distribution obtained at the Z Pole	EPJC 71 (2011) 1557	1102.4748
32	ALEPH Collaboration	Study of the fragmentation of b quarks into B mesons at the Z peak	PLB 512 (2001) 30	hep-ex/0106051
33	K. A. Olive	Review of Particle Physics	CPC 40 (2016) 100001
34	J. Alwall et al.	The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations	JHEP 07 (2014) 079	1405.0301
35	R. Frederix and S. Frixione	Merging meets matching in MC@NLO	JHEP 12 (2012) 061	1209.6215
36	M. Czakon, D. Heymes, and A. Mitov	High-precision differential predictions for top-quark pairs at the LHC	PRL 116 (2016) 082003	1511.00549
37	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV	PRD 95 (2017) 092001	CMS-TOP-16-008 1610.04191
38	CMS Collaboration	Measurement of the differential cross section for $\mathrm{t \bar t}$ production in the dilepton final state at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV	CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011	CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011
39	J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands	String Formation Beyond Leading Colour	JHEP 08 (2015) 003	1505.01681
40	S. Argyropoulos and T. Sjostrand	Effects of color reconnection on $t\bar{t}$ final states at the LHC	JHEP 11 (2014) 043	1407.6653