CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SMP-17-010
Measurements of differential Z boson production cross sections in pp collisions with CMS at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: We present measurements of the differential $\mathrm{Z}/\gamma^{*}$ production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in the electron and muon final states. The data collected with the CMS detector at the LHC correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The measured fiducial inclusive cross section times branching fraction agrees with next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD calculations. Distributions of the transverse momentum, the angular variable $\phi^{*}$, and the rapidity of lepton pairs are measured. The data are corrected for detector effects and compared to theoretical predictions.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ (top), rapidity $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ (middle), and $\phi ^*$ (bottom). The left plots pertain to the muon-pair final state and the right plots pertain to the electron-pair final state. The uncertainty in the trigger efficiency is included as part of the lepton identification uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$. The plot pertains to the muon-pair final state. The uncertainty in the trigger efficiency is included as part of the lepton identification uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$. The plot pertains to the electron-pair final state. The uncertainty in the trigger efficiency is included as part of the lepton identification uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of rapidity $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$. The plot pertains to the muon-pair final state. The uncertainty in the trigger efficiency is included as part of the lepton identification uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of rapidity $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$. The plot pertains to the electron-pair final state. The uncertainty in the trigger efficiency is included as part of the lepton identification uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 1-e:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of $\phi ^*$. The plot pertains to the muon-pair final state. The uncertainty in the trigger efficiency is included as part of the lepton identification uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 1-f:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of $\phi ^*$. The plot pertains to the electron-pair final state. The uncertainty in the trigger efficiency is included as part of the lepton identification uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ (top), rapidity $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ (middle), and $\phi ^*$ (bottom). The left plots pertain to the muon-pair final state and the right plots pertain to the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$. The plot pertains to the muon-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$. The plot pertains to the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of rapidity $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$. The plot pertains to the muon-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of rapidity $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$. The plot pertains to the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 2-e:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of $\phi ^*$. The plot pertains to the muon-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 2-f:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of $\phi ^*$. The plot pertains to the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 bin (top left), 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 bin (top right), 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 bin (middle left), 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 bin (middle right), and 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 bin (bottom) in the muon-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 bin in the muon-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 bin in the muon-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 bin in the muon-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 bin in the muon-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 3-e:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 bin in the muon-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 bin (top left), 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 bin (top right), 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 bin (middle left), 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 bin (middle right), and 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 bin (bottom) in the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 bin, in the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 bin, in the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 bin, in the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 bin, in the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 4-e:
The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 bin, in the electron-pair final state.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The measured absolute cross sections (left) in bins of $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ for the muon-pair (top) and electron-pair (middle) final states, and for the combination (bottom). The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ for the muon-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ for the muon-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ for the electron-pair final state.The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ for the electron-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-e:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ for the combination muon and electron-pair final states.The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-f:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ for the combination muon and electron-pair final states.The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The measured absolute cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the muon-pair (top) and electron-pair (middle) final states, and for the combination (bottom). The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the muon-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the muon-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the electron-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-d:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the electron-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-e:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the combination of muon and electron-pair final states. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-f:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the combination of muon and electron-pair final states. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 7:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the combination of the muon-pair and electron-pair final states. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The left plot shows comparisons to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), Resbos (green triangles), and GENEVA (blue circles). The right plot shows the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ distribution for $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > 32 GeV $ compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), $\mathrm{Z} $ + 1 jet at NNLO (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties. Only the statistical uncertainties are shown for the predictions with Resbos.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the combination of the muon-pair and electron-pair final states. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The plot shows comparisons to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), Resbos (green triangles), and GENEVA (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties. Only the statistical uncertainties are shown for the predictions with Resbos.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the combination of the muon-pair and electron-pair final states. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The plot shows the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ distribution for $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} > 32 GeV $ compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), $\mathrm{Z} $ + 1 jet at NNLO (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties. Only the statistical uncertainties are shown for the predictions with Resbos.

png pdf
Figure 8:
The measured absolute cross sections (left) in bins of $\phi ^*$ for the muon-pair (top) and electron-pair (middle) final states, and for the combination (bottom). The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $\phi ^*$ for the muon-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $\phi ^*$ for the muon-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $\phi ^*$ for the electron-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-d:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $\phi ^*$ for the electron-pair final state. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-e:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $\phi ^*$ for the combination of muon and electron-pair final states. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 8-f:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $\phi ^*$ for the combination of muon and electron-pair final states. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9:
The measured absolute cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 10:
The measured absolute cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11:
The measured absolute cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 12:
The measured absolute cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 12-a:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 12-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 13:
The measured absolute cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 13-a:
The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 13-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 14:
The measured normalized cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ (top), $\phi ^*$ (middle), and $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ (bottom) for the combined measurement. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ and $\phi ^*$ measurements are compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 14-a:
The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the combined measurement. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 14-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the combined measurement. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles).The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 14-c:
The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $\phi ^*$ for the combined measurement. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 14-d:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $\phi ^*$ for the combined measurement. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 14-e:
The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ for the combined measurement. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 14-f:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $| {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}|$ for the combined measurement. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and FEWZ (blue circles). The error bars around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 15:
The measured normalized cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 15-a:
The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 15-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.0 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.4 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 16:
The measured normalized cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 16-a:
The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 16-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.4 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 0.8 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 17:
The measured normalized cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 17-a:
The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 17-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 0.8 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.2 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 18:
The measured normalized cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 18-a:
The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 18-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.2 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 1.6 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 19:
The measured normalized cross sections (left) in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 region. The ratios of the predictions to the data are also shown (right). The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 19-a:
The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 19-b:
The ratios of the predictions to the data in bins of $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} ^{\mathrm{Z}}$ for the 1.6 $ < | {y}^{\mathrm{Z}}| < $ 2.4 region. The shaded band around the data points (black) correspond to the total experimental uncertainty. The measurement is compared to predictions with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO (square red markers), POWHEG (green triangles), and POWHEG-MiNLO (blue circles). The error bands around the predictions correspond to the statistical, PDF, and scale uncertainties.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties for the inclusive fiducial cross section measurements.

png pdf
Table 2:
The measured inclusive fiducial cross sections in the muon-pair and electron-pair final states. The combined measurement is also shown.
Summary
Measurements of differential $\mathrm{Z}/\gamma^{*}$ production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV in the electron and muon final state are presented. The data collected with the CMS detector at the LHC correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Distributions of the transverse momentum, the angular variable $\phi^{*}$, and the rapidity of lepton pairs are measured. The data are corrected for detector effects and compared to various theory predictions. The measurements provide sensitive tests of theoretical predictions using fixed order, resummed, and parton shower calculations. The measured normalized cross section uncertainties are smaller than 0.5% for $\phi^* < $ 0.5 and for ${p_{\mathrm{T}}}^{\mathrm{Z}} < $ 50 GeV.
References
1 K. Melnikov and F. Petriello Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through $ \mathcal{O}(\alpha_{\mathrm{s}}^2) $ PRD 74 (2006) 114017 hep-ph/0609070
2 S. Catani et al. Vector boson production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO PRL 103 (2009) 082001 0903.2120
3 A. Gehrmann-De Ridder et al. Precise QCD predictions for the production of a Z boson in association with a hadronic jet PRL 117 (2016), no. 2, 022001 1507.02850
4 R. Boughezal et al. Z-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD PRL 116 (2016), no. 15, 152001 1512.01291
5 R. Boughezal, C. Focke, X. Liu, and F. Petriello $ W $-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD PRL 115 (2015), no. 6, 062002 1504.02131
6 S. Dittmaier, A. Huss, and C. Schwinn Mixed QCD-electroweak $ \mathcal{O}(\alpha_s\alpha) $ corrections to Drell-Yan processes in the resonance region: pole approximation and non-factorizable corrections NPB 885 (2014) 318 1403.3216
7 J. M. Lindert et al. Precise predictions for $ V+ $ jets dark matter backgrounds EPJC 77 (2017), no. 12, 829 1705.04664
8 C. Balazs, J.-w. Qiu, and C. P. Yuan Effects of QCD resummation on distributions of leptons from the decay of electroweak vector bosons PLB 355 (1995) 548 hep-ph/9505203
9 S. Catani, D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, and M. Grazzini Vector boson production at hadron colliders: transverse-momentum resummation and leptonic decay JHEP 12 (2015) 047 1507.06937
10 P. Nason A new method for combining nlo qcd with shower monte carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
11 S. Frixione and B. R. Webber Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations JHEP 06 (2002) 029 hep-ph/0204244
12 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
13 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the transverse momentum distribution of Z$ /\gamma^* $ bosons in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 705 (2011) 415 1107.2381
14 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the Z$ /\gamma^* $ bosons transverse momentum distribution in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2014) 145 1406.3660
15 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the transverse momentum and $ \phi ^*_{\eta} $ distributions of Drell-Yan lepton pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016), no. 5, 291 1512.02192
16 ATLAS Collaboration Precision measurement and interpretation of inclusive $ W^+ $ , $ W^- $ and $ Z/\gamma ^* $ production cross sections with the ATLAS detector EPJC 77 (2017), no. 6, 367 1612.03016
17 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the differential Drell-Yan cross section in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Submitted to: JHEP (2018) CMS-SMP-17-001
1812.10529
18 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the rapidity and transverse momentum distributions of Z bosons in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRD 85 (2012) 032002 CMS-EWK-10-010
1110.4973
19 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Z boson differential cross section in transverse momentum and rapidity in proton-proton collisions at 8 TeV PLB 749 (2015) 187 CMS-SMP-13-013
1504.03511
20 CMS Collaboration Measurements of differential and double-differential Drell-Yan cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 ~TeV EPJC 75 (2015) 147 CMS-SMP-14-003
1412.1115
21 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the transverse momentum spectra of weak vector bosons produced in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 02 (2017) 096 CMS-SMP-14-012
1606.05864
22 LHCb Collaboration Inclusive $ \mathrm{W} $ and Z production in the forward region at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 06 (2012) 058 1204.1620
23 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the cross-section for Z$ \rightarrow \rm{e^+e^-} $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 02 (2013) 106 1212.4620
24 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the forward Z boson production cross-section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 08 (2015) 039 1505.07024
25 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of forward W and Z boson production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JHEP 01 (2016) 155 1511.08039
26 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the forward Z boson production cross-section in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JHEP 09 (2016) 136 1607.06495
27 CDF Collaboration The transverse momentum and total cross section of $ \rm{e^+e^-} $ pairs in the Z boson region from $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.8 TeV PRL 84 (2000) 845 hep-ex/0001021
28 D0 Collaboration Differential production cross section of Z bosons as a function of transverse momentum at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.8 TeV PRL 84 (2000) 2792 hep-ex/9909020
29 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the shape of the boson transverse momentum distribution in $ p \bar{p} \to Z / \gamma^{*} \to e^+ e^- + X $ events produced at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96-TeV PRL 100 (2008) 102002 0712.0803
30 D0 Collaboration Measurement of the normalized $ Z/\gamma^* \to \mu^+\mu^- $ transverse momentum distribution in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 1.96 TeV PLB 693 (2010) 522 1006.0618
31 D0 Collaboration Precise study of the $ Z/\gamma^* $ boson transverse momentum distribution in $ p\bar{p} $ collisions using a novel technique PRL 106 (2011) 122001 1010.0262
32 A. Banfi et al. Optimisation of variables for studying dilepton transverse momentum distributions at hadron colliders EPJC 71 (2011) 1600 1009.1580
33 A. Banfi, M. Dasgupta, S. Marzani, and L. Tomlinson Predictions for Drell-Yan $ \phi^* $ and $ Q_T $ observables at the LHC PLB 715 (2012) 152 1205.4760
34 S. Marzani $ Q_T $ and $ \phi^* $ observables in Drell-Yan processes EPJ Web Conf. 49 (2013) 14007
35 CMS Collaboration Measurement of differential cross sections in the kinematic angular variable $ \phi^* $ for inclusive Z boson production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 03 (2018) 172 CMS-SMP-17-002
1710.07955
36 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
37 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
38 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4: A simulation toolkit NIMA506 (2003) 250
39 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 07 (2008) 060 0805.4802
40 J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC NPPS 205 (2010) 10--15 1007.3492
41 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
42 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026 hep-ph/0603175
43 T. Sjostrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
44 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
45 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
46 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
47 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
48 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
49 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Dispelling the $ N^{3} $ myth for the $ k_{t} $ jet-finder PLB 641 (2006) 57 hep-ph/0512210
50 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
51 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
52 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
53 CMS Collaboration Search for invisible decays of Higgs bosons in the vector boson fusion and associated ZH production modes EPJC 74 (2014) 2980 CMS-HIG-13-030
1404.1344
54 S. Schmitt TUnfold: an algorithm for correcting migration effects in high energy physics JINST 7 (2012) T10003 1205.6201
55 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Drell--Yan cross section in $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 ~TeV JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
56 A. Bodek et al. Extracting muon momentum scale corrections for hadron collider experiments EPJC 72 (2012) 2194 1208.3710
57 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
58 P. Golonka and Z. Was PHOTOS Monte Carlo: A precision tool for QED corrections in $ Z $ and $ W $ decays EPJC 45 (2006) 97 hep-ph/0506026
59 M. Botje et al. The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Recommendations 1101.0538
60 S. Alekhin et al. The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Report 1101.0536
61 H.-L. Lai et al. New parton distributions for collider physics PRD 82 (2010) 074024 1007.2241
62 A. D. Martin et al. Parton distributions for the LHC EPJC 63 (2009) 189 0901.0002
63 R. D. Ball et al. Impact of Heavy Quark Masses on Parton Distributions and LHC Phenomenology NPB 849 (2011) 296 1101.1300
64 K. Melnikov and F. Petriello The $ W $ boson production cross section at the LHC through $ O(\alpha^2_s) $ PRL 96 (2006) 231803 hep-ph/0603182
65 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush FEWZ 2.0: A code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order CPC 182 (2011) 2388 1011.3540
66 R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush W Physics at the LHC with FEWZ 2.1 CPC 184 (2013) 208 1201.5896
67 Y. Li and F. Petriello Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ PRB 86 (2012) 094034 1208.5967
68 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017), no. 10, 663 1706.00428
69 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
70 K. Hamilton, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and G. Zanderighi Merging H/W/Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with no merging scale: a path to parton shower + NNLO matching JHEP 05 (2013) 082 1212.4504
71 G. A. Ladinsky and C. P. Yuan The nonperturbative regime in QCD resummation for gauge boson production at hadron colliders PRD 50 (1994) R4239 hep-ph/9311341
72 C. Balazs and C. P. Yuan Soft gluon effects on lepton pairs at hadron colliders PRD 56 (1997) 5558 hep-ph/9704258
73 F. Landry, R. Brock, P. M. Nadolsky, and C. P. Yuan Tevatron Run-1 $ Z $ boson data and Collins-Soper-Sterman resummation formalism PRD 67 (2003) 073016 hep-ph/0212159
74 S. Alioli et al. Drell-Yan production at NNLL'+NNLO matched to parton showers PRD 92 (2015), no. 9, 094020 1508.01475
75 S. Dulat et al. New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics PRD 93 (2016), no. 3, 033006 1506.07443
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN