CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-17-017 ; CERN-EP-2018-219
Search for physics beyond the standard model in high-mass diphoton events from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 092001
Abstract: A search for physics beyond the standard model is performed using a sample of high-mass diphoton events produced in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV. The data sample was collected in 2016 with the CMS detector at the LHC and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The search is performed for both resonant and nonresonant new physics signatures. At 95% confidence level, lower limits on the mass of the first Kaluza-Klein excitation of the graviton in the Randall-Sundrum warped extra-dimensional model are determined to be in the range of 2.3 to 4.6 TeV, for values of the associated coupling parameter between 0.01 and 0.2. Lower limits on the production of scalar resonances and model-independent cross section upper limits are also provided. For the large extra-dimensional model of Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos, and Dvali, lower limits are set on the string mass scale $ {M_{\mathrm{S}}} $ ranging from 5.6 to 9.7 TeV, depending on the model parameters. The first exclusion limits are set in the two-dimensional parameter space of a continuum clockwork model.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Figures References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The product of the event selection efficiency ($\varepsilon $) and the detector acceptance (A) is shown as a function of signal resonance mass $ {m_{\mathrm {X}}} $ for the $ {{\Gamma _{\mathrm {X}}} / {m_{\mathrm {X}}}} = 1.4\times 10^{-4}$ signal width hypothesis. The total (black), EBEB (red), and EBEE (blue) curves are shown for the spin (J) hypotheses $\mathrm {J}=$ 0 (solid) and $\mathrm {J}= $ 2 (dashed).

png pdf
Figure 2:
Observed diphoton invariant mass spectra for the EBEB (left) and EBEE (right) categories. Also shown are the results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis. The shaded region shows the one standard deviation uncertainty band associated with the fit, reflecting the statistical uncertainty of the data. The lower panels show the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Observed diphoton invariant mass spectrum for the EBEB category. Also shown are the results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis. The shaded region shows the one standard deviation uncertainty band associated with the fit, reflecting the statistical uncertainty of the data. The lower panel shows the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Observed diphoton invariant mass spectrum for the EBEE category. Also shown are the results of a likelihood fit to the background-only hypothesis. The shaded region shows the one standard deviation uncertainty band associated with the fit, reflecting the statistical uncertainty of the data. The lower panel shows the difference between the data and fit, divided by the statistical uncertainty in the data points.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section for RS gravitons of mass $ {m_\mathrm {{\mathrm {G}}}} $ and three values of ${\tilde{k}}$ (left) and for spin-0 resonances of mass $ {m_{\mathrm {S}}} $ produced via gluon fusion for the three width hypotheses (right). The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section for RS gravitons of mass $ {m_\mathrm {{\mathrm {G}}}} $ and ${\tilde{k}} = $ 0.01. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section for spin-0 resonances of mass $ {m_{\mathrm {S}}} $ produced via gluon fusion for $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4 {\times} 10^{-4} $. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section for RS gravitons of mass $ {m_\mathrm {{\mathrm {G}}}} $ and ${\tilde{k}} = $ 0.1. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section for spin-0 resonances of mass $ {m_{\mathrm {S}}} $ produced via gluon fusion for $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4 {\times} 10^{-2} $. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 3-e:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section for RS gravitons of mass $ {m_\mathrm {{\mathrm {G}}}} $ and ${\tilde{k}} = $ 0.2. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 3-f:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section for spin-0 resonances of mass $ {m_{\mathrm {S}}} $ produced via gluon fusion for $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} = 5.6 {\times} 10^{-2}$. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the fiducial cross section for the resonant $ {\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to \gamma \gamma $ process. Shown are the results in the EBEB (left) and EBEE (right) categories for the three width hypotheses. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the fiducial cross section for the resonant $ {\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to \gamma \gamma $ process. Shown are the results in the EBEB category for $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4 {\times} 10^{-4}$. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the fiducial cross section for the resonant $ {\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to \gamma \gamma $ process. Shown are the results in the EBEE category for $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4 {\times} 10^{-4}$. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the fiducial cross section for the resonant $ {\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to \gamma \gamma $ process. Shown are the results in the EBEB category for $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4 {\times} 10^{-2}$. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the fiducial cross section for the resonant $ {\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to \gamma \gamma $ process. Shown are the results in the EBEE category for $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} = 1.4 {\times} 10^{-2}$. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 4-e:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the fiducial cross section for the resonant $ {\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to \gamma \gamma $ process. Shown are the results in the EBEB category for $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} = 5.6 {\times} 10^{-2}$. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 4-f:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the fiducial cross section for the resonant $ {\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to \gamma \gamma $ process. Shown are the results in the EBEE category for $\Gamma_{\mathrm{X}}/m_{\mathrm{X}} = 5.6 {\times} 10^{-2}$. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The diphoton invariant mass distributions in the EBEB (left) and EBEE (right) categories for the SM diphoton background prediction and the fake background measurement compared to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The error bars on the points indicate the statistical uncertainty. The upper (lower) plots show the pre-fit (post-fit) background estimates. The hatched bands indicate the total pre- or post-fit systematic uncertainties. Invariant mass distributions from two signal scenarios are superimposed on the lower plots. The bottom panels show the pull distributions, indicating the difference between the data and background prediction, divided by the uncertainty in the background, with error bars representing the statistical uncertainty and shaded bands showing the one standard deviation systematic uncertainty, normalized by the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The diphoton invariant mass distributions in the EBEB (left) and EBEE (right) categories for the SM diphoton pre-fit background prediction and the fake background measurement compared to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The error bars on the points indicate the statistical uncertainty. The hatched band indicates the total systematic uncertainties. The bottom panels show the pull distributions, indicating the difference between the data and background prediction, divided by the uncertainty in the background, with error bars representing the statistical uncertainty and shaded bands showing the one standard deviation systematic uncertainty, normalized by the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The diphoton invariant mass distributions in the EBEB (left) and EBEE (right) categories for the SM diphoton post-fit background prediction and the fake background measurement compared to the data. The last bin includes the overflow. The error bars on the points indicate the statistical uncertainty. The hatched bands indicate the total systematic uncertainties. Invariant mass distributions from two signal scenarios are superimposed on the plots. The bottom panels show the pull distributions, indicating the difference between the data and background prediction, divided by the uncertainty in the background, with error bars representing the statistical uncertainty and shaded bands showing the one standard deviation systematic uncertainty, normalized by the statistical uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 6:
The 95% CL exclusion limits for the continuous graviton model in the clockwork framework over the $k$-$M_5$ parameter space. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit. The shaded region with $k > M_5$ denotes the area where the theory becomes nonperturbative.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Exclusion lower limits obtained on the mass scale $ {M_{\mathrm {S}}} $ (in units of TeV) for various conventions used in the calculation of the ADD large extra dimensional scenario, as described in Section 4. The total asymmetric uncertainties are shown on the expected limits.
Summary
A search has been performed for physics beyond the standard model in high-mass diphoton events from proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data used correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$ collected by the CMS detector in 2016. A resonant peak in the diphoton invariant mass spectrum could indicate the existence of a new scalar particle, such as a heavy Higgs boson, or of a Kaluza-Klein excitation of the graviton in the Randall-Sundrum model of warped extra dimensions. A nonresonant excess could be a signature of large extra dimensions, in the scenario by Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos, and Dvali, or a continuum clockwork model.

The data are found to be in agreement with the predicted background from standard model sources, and no evidence for new physics is seen. Masses below 2.3-4.6 TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level for the excited state of the Randall-Sundrum graviton, for a coupling parameter in the range 0.01 $ < \tilde{k} < $ 0.2. Limits are also set on the production of scalar resonances, and model-independent cross section limits have been extracted as a function of diphoton invariant mass for any resonant $\gamma \gamma$ production process. These results extend the sensitivity of the previous search performed by the CMS experiment [19] and are compatible with those reported by the ATLAS Collaboration in Ref. [18]. In the large extra-dimensional model of Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos, and Dvali, exclusion limits on the string mass scale are set in the range 5.6 $ < {M_{\mathrm{S}}} < $ 9.7 TeV, depending on the specific model convention. These results extend the current best lower limits on $ {M_{\mathrm{S}}} $ from the diphoton channel as presented in Ref. [18]. Additionally, the first exclusion limits are set in the two-dimensional parameter space of a continuum clockwork model.
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1:
The product of the event selection efficiency ($\varepsilon $) and the detector acceptance (A) is shown as a function of signal resonance mass $m_{\mathrm {X}}$ for the $\Gamma _{\mathrm {X}}/ m_{\mathrm {X}} = 1.4\times 10^{-2}$ signal width hypothesis. The total (black), EBEB (red), and EBEE (blue) curves are shown for the spin (J) hypotheses $\mathrm {J}=$ 0 (solid) and $\mathrm {J}=$ 2 (dashed).

png pdf
Additional Figure 2:
The product of the event selection efficiency ($\varepsilon $) and the detector acceptance (A) is shown as a function of signal resonance mass $m_{\mathrm {X}}$ for the $\Gamma _{\mathrm {X}}/ m_{\mathrm {X}} = 5.6\times 10^{-2}$ signal width hypothesis. The total (black), EBEB (red), and EBEE (blue) curves are shown for the spin (J) hypotheses $\mathrm {J}=$ 0 (solid) and $\mathrm {J}=$ 2 (dashed).

png pdf
Additional Figure 3:
The 95% CL exclusion limits for the continuous graviton model in the clockwork framework over the $k$-$M_5$ parameter space using a linear $k$-axis scale. The shaded bands represent the 1 and 2 standard deviation uncertainty in the expected limit. The shaded region with $k > M_5$ denotes the area where the theory becomes nonperturbative.

png pdf
Additional Figure 4:
An event display of the highest invariant mass diphoton event recorded in 2016 at 1840 GeV in the EBEB category. The two photons are represented by the red ECAL energy deposits.

png pdf
Additional Figure 5:
The $K$ factor as a function of $m_{\gamma \gamma}$ in the EBEB category. The $K$ factor is defined as the ratio of the predicted MCFM NNLO $ {\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to \gamma \gamma $ cross section to that of SHERPA. The renormalization and factorization scales have been set to $m_{\gamma \gamma}$ (black) and varied simultaneously by factors of 0.5 (blue) and 2.0 (red).

png pdf
Additional Figure 6:
The $K$ factor as a function of $m_{\gamma \gamma}$ in the EBEE category. The $K$ factor is defined as the ratio of the predicted MCFM NNLO $ {\mathrm {p}} {\mathrm {p}}\to \gamma \gamma $ cross section to that of SHERPA. The renormalization and factorization scales have been set to $m_{\gamma \gamma}$ (black) and varied simultaneously by factors of 0.5 (blue) and 2.0 (red).
References
1 E. Witten Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry NPB 188 (1981) 513
2 S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5) NPB 193 (1981) 150
3 N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter PLB 429 (1998) 263 hep-ph/9803315
4 I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali New dimensions at a millimeter to a fermi and superstrings at a TeV PLB 436 (1998) 257 hep-ph/9804398
5 N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali Phenomenology, astrophysics and cosmology of theories with submillimeter dimensions and TeV scale quantum gravity PRD 59 (1999) 086004 hep-ph/9807344
6 L. Randall and R. Sundrum A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension PRL 83 (1999) 3370 hep-ph/9905221
7 L. Randall and R. Sundrum An alternative to compactification PRL 83 (1999) 4690 hep-th/9906064
8 G. F. Giudice and M. McCullough A clockwork theory JHEP 02 (2017) 036 1610.07962
9 I. Antoniadis, S. Dimopoulos, and A. Giveon Little string theory at a TeV JHEP 05 (2001) 055 hep-th/0103033
10 I. Antoniadis, A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, and A. Giveon Phenomenology of TeV little string theory from holography PRL 108 (2012) 081602 1102.4043
11 K. Choi and S. H. Im Realizing the relaxion from multiple axions and its UV completion with high scale supersymmetry JHEP 01 (2016) 149 1511.00132
12 D. E. Kaplan and R. Rattazzi Large field excursions and approximate discrete symmetries from a clockwork axion PRD 93 (2016) 085007 1511.01827
13 M. Baryakhtar Graviton phenomenology of linear dilaton geometries PRD 85 (2012) 125019 1202.6674
14 G. F. Giudice et al. Clockwork/linear dilaton: structure and phenomenology JHEP 06 (2018) 009 1711.08437
15 G. C. Branco et al. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models PR 516 (2012) 1 1106.0034
16 T. D. Lee A theory of spontaneous $ T $ violation PRD 8 (1973) 1226
17 N. Craig, J. Galloway, and S. Thomas Searching for signs of the second Higgs doublet 1305.2424
18 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in high-mass diphoton final states using 37 fb$^{-1}$ of proton--proton collisions collected at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 775 (2017) 105 1707.04147
19 CMS Collaboration Search for high-mass diphoton resonances in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV and combination with 8 TeV search PLB 767 (2017) 147 CMS-EXO-16-027
1609.02507
20 ATLAS Collaboration Search for resonances in diphoton events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 09 (2016) 001 1606.03833
21 CMS Collaboration Search for resonant production of high-mass photon pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 and 13 TeV PRL 117 (2016) 051802 CMS-EXO-16-018
1606.04093
22 ATLAS Collaboration Search for high-mass diphoton resonances in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 92 (2015) 032004 1504.05511
23 CMS Collaboration Search for diphoton resonances in the mass range from 150 to 850 GeV in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PLB 750 (2015) 494 CMS-HIG-14-006
1506.02301
24 ATLAS Collaboration Search for extra dimensions in diphoton events using proton-proton collisions recorded at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 043007 1210.8389
25 CMS Collaboration Search for signatures of extra dimensions in the diphoton mass spectrum at the Large Hadron Collider PRL 108 (2012) 111801 CMS-EXO-11-038
1112.0688
26 CDF Collaboration Search for new dielectron resonances and Randall-Sundrum gravitons at the Collider Detector at Fermilab PRL 107 (2011) 051801 1103.4650
27 D0 Collaboration Search for Randall-Sundrum gravitons in the dielectron and diphoton final states with 5.4 fb$^{-1}$ of data from $ {\mathrm{p}}\mathrm{\bar{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 1.96 TeV PRL 104 (2010) 241802 1004.1826
28 CMS Collaboration Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
29 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
30 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
31 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
32 CMS Collaboration Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties EPJC 74 (2014) 3076 CMS-HIG-13-001
1407.0558
33 CMS Collaboration Measurements of Higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV Submitted to \it JHEP CMS-HIG-16-040
1804.02716
34 T. Gleisberg et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 JHEP 02 (2009) 007 0811.4622
35 H.-L. Lai et al. New parton distributions for collider physics PRD 82 (2010) 074024 1007.2241
36 J. Gao et al. CT10 next-to-next-to-leading order global analysis of QCD PRD 89 (2014) 033009 1302.6246
37 T. Gleisberg et al. Helicity formalism for spin-2 particles JHEP 09 (2003) 001 hep-ph/0306182
38 G. F. Giudice, R. Rattazzi, and J. D. Wells Quantum gravity and extra dimensions at high-energy colliders NPB 544 (1999) 3 hep-ph/9811291
39 T. Han, J. D. Lykken, and R.-J. Zhang On Kaluza-Klein states from large extra dimensions PRD 59 (1999) 105006 hep-ph/9811350
40 J. L. Hewett Indirect collider signals for extra dimensions PRL 82 (1999) 4765 hep-ph/9811356
41 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
42 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
43 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions with LHC data NPB 867 (2013) 244 1207.1303
44 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
45 S. Hoeche, S. Schumann, and F. Siegert Hard photon production and matrix-element parton-shower merging PRD 81 (2010) 034026 0912.3501
46 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, Y. Li, and C. Williams Predictions for diphoton production at the LHC through NNLO in QCD JHEP 07 (2016) 148 1603.02663
47 T. Binoth, J. P. Guillet, E. Pilon, and M. Werlen A full next-to-leading order study of direct photon pair production in hadronic collisions EPJC 16 (2000) 311 hep-ph/9911340
48 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001
49 A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt Parton distributions for the LHC EPJC 63 (2009) 189 0901.0002
50 S. Alekhin et al. The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Report 1101.0536
51 M. Botje et al. The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Recommendations 1101.0538
52 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
53 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: The CLs technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
54 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
55 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
56 N. Metropolis et al. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines J. Chem. Phys. 21 (1953) 1087
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN