CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-EXO-16-032 ; CERN-EP-2016-277
Search for dijet resonances in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV and constraints on dark matter and other models
Phys. Lett. B 769 (2017) 520 [Corrigendum]
Abstract: A search is presented for narrow resonances decaying to dijet final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 12.9 fb$^{-1}$. The dijet mass spectrum is well described by a smooth parameterization and no significant evidence for the production of new particles is observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are reported on the production cross section for narrow resonances with masses above 0.6 TeV. In the context of specific models, the limits exclude string resonances with masses below 7.4 TeV, scalar diquarks below 6.9 TeV, axigluons and colorons below 5.5 TeV, excited quarks below 5.4 TeV, color-octet scalars below 3.0 TeV, $\mathrm{ W^{+} } ' $ bosons below 2.7 TeV, $\mathrm{ Z }'$ bosons below 2.1 TeV and between 2.3 and 2.6 TeV, and RS gravitons below 1.9 TeV. These extend previous limits in the dijet channel. Vector and axial-vector mediators in a simplified model of interactions between quarks and dark matter are excluded below 2.0 TeV. The first limits in the dijet channel on dark matter mediators are presented as functions of dark matter mass and are compared to the exclusions of dark matter in direct detection experiments.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Dijet mass spectrum (points) compared to a fitted parameterization of the background (solid curve) for the low-mass search (left) and the high-mass search (right). The lower panel in each plot shows the difference between the data and the fitted parametrization, divided by the statistical uncertainty of the data. Predicted signals from narrow gluon-gluon, quark-gluon, and quark-quark resonances are shown with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% CL.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Dijet mass spectrum (points) compared to a fitted parameterization of the background (solid curve) for the low-mass search. The lower panel shows the difference between the data and the fitted parametrization, divided by the statistical uncertainty of the data. Predicted signals from narrow gluon-gluon, quark-gluon, and quark-quark resonances are shown with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% CL.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Dijet mass spectrum (points) compared to a fitted parameterization of the background (solid curve) for the high-mass search. The lower panel shows the difference between the data and the fitted parametrization, divided by the statistical uncertainty of the data. Predicted signals from narrow gluon-gluon, quark-gluon, and quark-quark resonances are shown with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% CL.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for quark-quark (top left), quark-gluon (top right), and gluon-gluon (bottom left) type dijet resonances. The corresponding expected limits (dashed) and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels (shaded bands) are also shown. All observed limits (solid) are compared (bottom right). Limits are compared to predicted cross sections for string resonances [17,18], excited quarks [23,24], axigluons [20], colorons [22], scalar diquarks [19], color-octet scalars [25], new gauge bosons $\mathrm{ W^{+} }'$ and $\mathrm{ Z }' $ [26], dark matter mediators for $m_{\mathrm {DM}}= $ 1 GeV [27,28], and RS gravitons [29].

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for quark-quark type dijet resonances. The corresponding expected limits (dashed) and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels (shaded bands) are also shown. Limits are compared to predicted cross sections for axigluons [20], scalar diquarks [19], new gauge bosons $\mathrm{ W^{+} }'$ and $\mathrm{ Z }' $ [26], dark matter mediators for $m_{\mathrm {DM}}= $ 1 GeV [27,28].

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for quark-gluon type dijet resonances. The corresponding expected limits (dashed) and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels (shaded bands) are also shown. Limits are compared to predicted cross sections for string resonances [17,18] and excited quarks [23,24].

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for gluon-gluon type dijet resonances. The corresponding expected limits (dashed) and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels (shaded bands) are also shown. Limits are compared to predicted cross sections for color-octet scalars [25].

png pdf
Figure 2-d:
All observed limits (solid) are compared. Limits are compared to predicted cross sections for string resonances [17,18], excited quarks [23,24], axigluons [20], colorons [22], scalar diquarks [19], color-octet scalars [25], new gauge bosons $\mathrm{ W^{+} }'$ and $\mathrm{ Z }' $ [26], dark matter mediators for $m_{\mathrm {DM}}= $ 1 GeV [27,28], and RS gravitons [29].

png pdf
Figure 3:
The 95% CL upper limits on the universal quark coupling $ {g_{\mathrm {q}}} ^{\prime }$ as a function of resonance mass for a leptophobic $\mathrm{ Z }' $ resonance that only couples to quarks. The observed limits (solid), expected limits (dashed) and their variation at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels (shaded bands) are shown. Dotted horizontal lines show the coupling strength for which the cross section for dijet production in this model is the same as for a DM mediator (see text).

png pdf
Figure 4:
The 95% CL observed (solid) and expected (dashed) excluded regions in the plane of dark matter mass vs. mediator mass, for a vector mediator, are compared to constraints from the cosmological relic density of DM (light gray) determined from astrophysical measurements [51,52] and MadDM version 2.0.6 [53,54] as described in Ref. [55]. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group [27,28], the exclusions are computed for Dirac DM and for a universal quark coupling $ {g_{\mathrm {q}}} = $ 0.25 and for a DM coupling of $ {g_{\text {DM}}} = $ 1.0. It should also be noted that the excluded region strongly depends on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the excluded regions and relic density contours shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The 95% CL observed (solid) and expected (dashed) excluded regions in the plane of dark matter mass vs. mediator mass, for an axial-vector mediator, are compared to constraints from the cosmological relic density of DM (light gray) determined from astrophysical measurements [51,52] and MadDM version 2.0.6 [53,54] as described in Ref. [55]. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group [27,28], the exclusions are computed for Dirac DM and for a universal quark coupling $ {g_{\mathrm {q}}} = $ 0.25 and for a DM coupling of $ {g_{\text {DM}}} = $ 1.0. It should also be noted that the excluded region strongly depends on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the excluded regions and relic density contours shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The 95% CL observed (solid) and expected (dashed) excluded regions in the plane of dark matter mass vs. mediator mass, for a vector mediator, are compared to constraints from the cosmological relic density of DM (light gray) determined from astrophysical measurements [51,52] and MadDM version 2.0.6 [53,54] as described in Ref. [55]. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group [27,28], the exclusions are computed for Dirac DM and for a universal quark coupling $ {g_{\mathrm {q}}} = $ 0.25 and for a DM coupling of $ {g_{\text {DM}}} = $ 1.0. It should also be noted that the excluded region strongly depends on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the excluded regions and relic density contours shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Excluded regions at 90% CL in the plane of dark matter nucleon interaction cross section vs. dark matter mass. (left) The CMS exclusion of a spin-dependent cross section (shaded) from an axial-vector mediator decaying to dijets is compared with limits from the PICO experiments [56,57], IceCube [58], and Super-Kamiokande [59]. (right) The CMS exclusion of a spin-independent cross section (shaded) from a vector mediator decaying to dijets is compared with the LUX 2016 [60], PandaX-II 2016 [61], CDMSLite 2015 [62], and CRESST-II 2015 [63] limits, which have documented the most constraining results in the shown mass range. The CMS exclusions are for Dirac DM and couplings $ {g_{\mathrm {q}}} = $ 0.25 and $ {g_{\text {DM}}} = $ 1, for leptophobic axial-vector and vector mediators, and they strongly depend on these choices and are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models. The CMS limits do not include a constraint on the relic density.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Excluded regions at 90% CL in the plane of dark matter nucleon interaction cross section vs. dark matter mass. The CMS exclusion of a spin-dependent cross section (shaded) from an axial-vector mediator decaying to dijets is compared with limits from the PICO experiments [56,57], IceCube [58], and Super-Kamiokande [59]. The CMS exclusions are for Dirac DM and couplings $ {g_{\mathrm {q}}} = $ 0.25 and $ {g_{\text {DM}}} = $ 1, for leptophobic axial-vector and vector mediators, and they strongly depend on these choices and are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models. The CMS limits do not include a constraint on the relic density.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Excluded regions at 90% CL in the plane of dark matter nucleon interaction cross section vs. dark matter mass. The CMS exclusion of a spin-independent cross section (shaded) from a vector mediator decaying to dijets is compared with the LUX 2016 [60], PandaX-II 2016 [61], CDMSLite 2015 [62], and CRESST-II 2015 [63] limits, which have documented the most constraining results in the shown mass range. The CMS exclusions are for Dirac DM and couplings $ {g_{\mathrm {q}}} = $ 0.25 and $ {g_{\text {DM}}} = $ 1, for leptophobic axial-vector and vector mediators, and they strongly depend on these choices and are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models. The CMS limits do not include a constraint on the relic density.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Observed and expected mass limits at 95% CL. The listed models are excluded between 0.6 TeV and the indicated mass. $^*$In addition to the observed mass limits listed below, this analysis also excludes a $\mathrm{ Z }' $ in the mass interval between 2.3 and 2.6 TeV.
Summary
Two searches for narrow resonances decaying into a pair of jets have been performed using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 12.9 fb$^{-1}$: a low-mass search based on calorimeter jets, reconstructed by the high level trigger and recorded in compact form (data scouting), and a high-mass search based on particle-flow jets. The dijet mass spectra are observed to be smoothly falling distributions. In the analyzed data samples, there is no evidence for resonant particle production. Generic upper limits are presented on the product of the cross section, the branching fraction, and the acceptance for narrow quark-quark, quark-gluon, and gluon-gluon resonances that are applicable to any model of narrow dijet resonance production. String resonances with masses below 7.4 TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level, as are scalar diquarks below 6.9 TeV, axigluons and colorons below 5.5 TeV, excited quarks below 5.4 TeV, color-octet scalars below 3.0 TeV, $\mathrm{ W^{+} }'$ bosons below 2.7 TeV, $\mathrm{ Z }'$ bosons below 2.1 TeV and between 2.3 and 2.6 TeV, and Randall-Sundrum gravitons below 1.9 TeV. This extends previously published limits in the dijet channel. The first limits are set on a simplified model of dark matter mediators using the dijet channel, excluding vector and axial-vector mediators below 2.0 TeV. Limits on the mass of a dark matter mediator are presented as a function of dark matter mass, and are translated into upper limits on the cross section for dark matter particles scattering on nucleons that are more sensitive than those of direct detection experiments for spin-dependent cross sections.
References
1 M. Chala et al. Constraining dark sectors with monojets and dijets JHEP 07 (2015) 089 1503.05916
2 CMS Collaboration Search for Narrow Resonances Decaying to Dijets in Proton-Proton Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRL 116 (2016) 071801 CMS-EXO-15-001
1512.01224
3 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in dijet mass and angular distributions from pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 754 (2016) 302 1512.01530
4 CMS Collaboration Search for resonances and quantum black holes using dijet mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 91 (2015) 052009 CMS-EXO-12-059
1501.04198
5 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new phenomena in the dijet mass distribution using pp collision data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 91 (2015) 052007 1407.1376
6 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow resonances using the dijet mass spectrum in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 87 (2013) 114015 CMS-EXO-12-016
1302.4794
7 CMS Collaboration Search for narrow resonances and quantum black holes in inclusive and b-tagged dijet mass spectra from pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 01 (2013) 013 CMS-EXO-11-094
1210.2387
8 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new physics in the dijet mass distribution using 1 fb$ ^{-1} $ of $ pp $ collision data at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV collected by the ATLAS detector PLB 708 (2012) 37 1108.6311
9 ATLAS Collaboration ATLAS search for new phenomena in dijet mass and angular distributions using pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JHEP 01 (2013) 029 1210.1718
10 CMS Collaboration Search for resonances in the dijet mass spectrum from 7 TeV pp collisions at CMS PLB 704 (2011) 123 CMS-EXO-11-015
1107.4771
11 ATLAS Collaboration Search for new physics in dijet mass and angular distributions in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV measured with the ATLAS detector New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 053044 1103.3864
12 CMS Collaboration Search for Dijet Resonances in 7 TeV pp Collisions at CMS PRL 105 (2010) 211801 CMS-EXO-10-010
1010.0203
13 ATLAS Collaboration Search for New Particles in Two-Jet Final States in 7 TeV Proton-Proton Collisions with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC PRL 105 (2010) 161801 1008.2461
14 R. M. Harris and K. Kousouris Searches for dijet resonances at hadron colliders Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 5005 1110.5302
15 CMS Collaboration Data Parking and Data Scouting at the CMS Experiment CDS
16 CMS Collaboration Search for Narrow Resonances in Dijet Final States at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the Novel CMS Technique of Data Scouting PRL 117 (2016) 031802 CMS-EXO-14-005
1604.08907
17 L. A. Anchordoqui et al. Dijet Signals for Low Mass Strings at the LHC PRL 101 (2008) 241803 0808.0497
18 S. Cullen, M. Perelstein, and M. E. Peskin TeV strings and collider probes of large extra dimensions PRD 62 (2000) 055012 hep-ph/0001166
19 J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo Low-energy phenomenology of superstring-inspired E(6) models PR 183 (1989) 193
20 P. H. Frampton and S. L. Glashow Chiral Color: An Alternative to the Standard Model PLB 190 (1987) 157
21 R. S. Chivukula, E. H. Simmons, A. Farzinnia, and J. Ren Hadron collider production of massive color-octet vector bosons at next-to-leading order PRD 87 (2013) 094011 1303.1120
22 E. H. Simmons Coloron phenomenology PRD 55 (1997) 1678 hep-ph/9608269
23 U. Baur, I. Hinchliffe, and D. Zeppenfeld Excited Quark Production at Hadron Colliders Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 02 (1987) 1285
24 U. Baur, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Excited quark and lepton production at hadron colliders PRD 42 (1990) 815
25 T. Han, I. Lewis, and Z. Liu Colored resonant signals at the LHC: largest rate and simplest topology JHEP 12 (2010) 085 1010.4309
26 E. Eichten, I. Hinchliffe, K. D. Lane, and C. Quigg Supercollider physics Rev. Mod. Phys. 56 (1984) 579
27 A. Boveia et al. Recommendations on presenting LHC searches for missing transverse energy signals using simplified $ s $-channel models of dark matter 1603.04156
28 J. Abdallah et al. Simplified models for dark matter searches at the LHC Phys. Dark Univ. 9-10 (2015) 8 1506.03116
29 L. Randall and R. Sundrum An alternative to compactification PRL 83 (1999) 4690 hep-th/9906064
30 R. S. Chivukula, E. H. Simmons, and N. Vignaroli Distinguishing dijet resonances at the LHC PRD 91 (2015) 055019 1412.3094
31 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
32 CMS Collaboration Particle--Flow Event Reconstruction in CMS and Performance for Jets, Taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ CDS
33 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the Particle-flow Event Reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
34 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The Anti-$ k_\mathrm{t} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
35 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Dispelling the $ N^{3} $ myth for the $ k_\mathrm{t} $ jet-finder PLB 641 (2006) 57 hep-ph/0512210
36 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
37 M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam Pileup subtraction using jet areas PLB 659 (2008) 119 0707.1378
38 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV Submitted to JINST CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
39 CMS Collaboration Jet Performance in pp Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV CDS
40 CDF Collaboration Search for new particles decaying into dijets in proton-antiproton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 79 (2009) 112002 0812.4036
41 T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 Comp. Phys. Comm. 178 (2008) 852 0710.3820
42 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
43 P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 tune EPJC 74 (2014) 3024 1404.5630
44 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 --- a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
45 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
46 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ CL_s $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
47 LHC Higgs Combination Group Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011-005
48 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
49 J. Pumplin et al. New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis JHEP 07 (2002) 012 hep-ph/0201195
50 B. A. Dobrescu and F. Yu Coupling-mass mapping of dijet peak searches PRD 88 (2013) 035021 1306.2629
51 WMAP Collaboration Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three year results: implications for cosmology Astrophys. J. Suppl. 170 (2007) 377 astro-ph/0603449
52 Planck Collaboration Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A16 1303.5076
53 M. Backovic, K. Kong, and M. McCaskey MadDM v.1.0: Computation of Dark Matter Relic Abundance Using MadGraph5 Phys. Dark Univ. 5 (2014) 18 1308.4955
54 M. Backovic et al. Direct detection of dark matter with MadDM v.2.0 Phys. Dark Univ. 9 (2015) 37 1505.04190
55 T. du Pree, K. Hahn, P. Harris, and C. Roskas Cosmological constraints on Dark Matter models for collider searches 1603.08525
56 PICO Collaboration Improved dark matter search results from PICO-2L Run 2 PRD 93 (2016) 061101 1601.03729
57 PICO Collaboration Dark matter search results from the PICO-60 CF$ _3 $I bubble chamber PRD 93 (2016) 052014 1510.07754
58 IceCube Collaboration Improved limits on dark matter annihilation in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector and implications for supersymmetry JCAP 04 (2016) 022 1601.00653
59 Super-Kamiokande Collaboration Search for Neutrinos from Annihilation of Captured Low-Mass Dark Matter Particles in the Sun by Super-Kamiokande PRL 114 (2015) 141301 1503.04858
60 LUX Collaboration Results from a search for dark matter in LUX with 332 live days of exposure 1608.07648
61 PandaX-II Collaboration Dark Matter Results from First 98.7 Days of Data from the PandaX-II Experiment PRL 117 (2016) 121303 1607.07400
62 SuperCDMS Collaboration New Results from the Search for Low-Mass Weakly Interacting Massive Particles with the CDMS Low Ionization Threshold Experiment PRL 106 (2016) 071301 1509.02448
63 CRESST Collaboration Results on light dark matter particles with a low-threshold CRESST-II detector EPJC 76 (2016) 25 1509.01515
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN