CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-B2G-16-025 ; CERN-EP-2017-272
Search for pair production of excited top quarks in the lepton+jets final state
Phys. Lett. B 778 (2018) 349
Abstract: A search is performed for the pair production of spin-3/2 excited top quarks, each decaying to a top quark and a gluon. The search uses the data collected with the CMS detector from proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. Events are selected by requiring an isolated muon or electron, an imbalance in the transverse momentum, and at least six jets of which exactly two must be compatible with originating from the fragmentation of a bottom quark. No significant excess over the standard model predictions is found. A lower limit of 1.2 TeV is set at 95% confidence level on the mass of the spin-3/2 excited top quark in an extension of the Randall-Sundrum model, assuming a 100% branching fraction of its decay into a top quark and a gluon. These are the best limits to date in a search for excited top quarks and the first at 13 TeV.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Kinematic distributions of selected events with a single lepton and six or more jets of which exactly two are b tagged. Data events (points), simulated background processes (stacked histograms), and a simulated 800 GeV signal process (dashed line) are shown. Events selected in the $\mu $+jet final state are shown on the left while those in the e+jet final state are shown on the right. From upper to lower, the kinematic variables displayed are the lepton $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $, the jet $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ and the $m_{\rm t+jet}$. The shaded region is the total uncertainty of the simulated background processes, which includes statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Lepton $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution of selected events with a single muon and six or more jets of which exactly two are b tagged. Data events (points), simulated background processes (stacked histograms), and a simulated 800 GeV signal process (dashed line) are shown. The shaded region is the total uncertainty of the simulated background processes, which includes statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Lepton $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution of selected events with a single electron and six or more jets of which exactly two are b tagged. Data events (points), simulated background processes (stacked histograms), and a simulated 800 GeV signal process (dashed line) are shown. The shaded region is the total uncertainty of the simulated background processes, which includes statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Jet $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution of selected events with a single muon and six or more jets of which exactly two are b tagged. Data events (points), simulated background processes (stacked histograms), and a simulated 800 GeV signal process (dashed line) are shown. The shaded region is the total uncertainty of the simulated background processes, which includes statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Jet $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ distribution of selected events with a single electron and six or more jets of which exactly two are b tagged. Data events (points), simulated background processes (stacked histograms), and a simulated 800 GeV signal process (dashed line) are shown. The shaded region is the total uncertainty of the simulated background processes, which includes statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-e:
$m_{\rm t+jet}$ distribution of selected events with a single muon and six or more jets of which exactly two are b tagged. Data events (points), simulated background processes (stacked histograms), and a simulated 800 GeV signal process (dashed line) are shown. The shaded region is the total uncertainty of the simulated background processes, which includes statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 1-f:
$m_{\rm t+jet}$ distribution of selected events with a single electron and six or more jets of which exactly two are b tagged. Data events (points), simulated background processes (stacked histograms), and a simulated 800 GeV signal process (dashed line) are shown. The shaded region is the total uncertainty of the simulated background processes, which includes statistical and systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The $m_{\rm t+jet}$ spectrum in the for data (points), the signal+background fit (green), the background component of the signal+background fit (blue), and the expected spectrum for a simulated 800 GeV signal process (red dashed) normalized to the integrated luminosity of data. Since there is no significant excess of signal found in data, the signal+background curve overlaps the background-only component. The distributions for the $\mu $+jets data are shown on the left while those for e+jets data are shown on the right. The probabilities of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test between the data versus the signal+background model and between the data versus the background component are denoted by $K_{\text {all}}$ and $K_{\text {bkg}}$, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The $m_{\rm t+jet}$ spectrum in the $\mu $+jet final state for data (points), the signal+background fit (green), the background component of the signal+background fit (blue), and the expected spectrum for a simulated 800 GeV signal process (red dashed) normalized to the integrated luminosity of data. Since there is no significant excess of signal found in data, the signal+background curve overlaps the background-only component. The probabilities of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test between the data versus the signal+background model and between the data versus the background component are denoted by $K_{\text {all}}$ and $K_{\text {bkg}}$, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The $m_{\rm t+jet}$ spectrum in the e+jet final state for data (points), the signal+background fit (green), the background component of the signal+background fit (blue), and the expected spectrum for a simulated 800 GeV signal process (red dashed) normalized to the integrated luminosity of data. Since there is no significant excess of signal found in data, the signal+background curve overlaps the background-only component. The probabilities of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test between the data versus the signal+background model and between the data versus the background component are denoted by $K_{\text {all}}$ and $K_{\text {bkg}}$, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limits for the product of the production cross section of $ {{{\mathrm{t} {}^{*}}} {{\mathrm{\bar{t}} {}^{*}}}}$ and the square of the branching fraction, as a function of the $ {{\mathrm{t} {}^{*}}} $ mass, for the combined lepton+jets analysis. The theoretical production cross section assuming a 100% $ {{\mathrm{t} {}^{*}}} \to \mathrm{t} \mathrm{g} $ branching fraction is shown along with its uncertainties, described in Section xxxxx.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Expected numbers of selected events for the simulated signal process as a function of $ m_{{{\mathrm{t} {}^{*}}}}$. Also shown are the expected numbers of events predicted by the SM, together with the systematic uncertainties discussed in Section xxxxx and the uncertainties in the cross sections of the various processes, as well as the numbers of selected events observed in data.

png pdf
Table 2:
Sources of systematic uncertainties and the methods used to evaluate their effect on the simulated signal sample. (s.d.: standard deviation, SF: correction scale factor)
Summary
A search has been conducted for pair production of spin-3/2 excited top quarks ${{\mathrm{t}{}^{*}}} $ in proton-proton interactions, with each $ {{\mathrm{t}{}^{*}}} $ decaying exclusively to a standard model top quark and a gluon. Events that have a single muon or electron and at least six jets, exactly two of which must be identified as originating from a bottom quark, are selected for the analysis. Assuming $ {{{\mathrm{t}{}^{*}}} {{\mathrm{\bar{t}}{}^{*}}} } $ production, the final-state objects are associated with the $ {{\mathrm{t}{}^{*}}} $ candidates in each event. No significant deviations from standard model predictions are observed in the $\mathrm{t}$+jet system, and an upper limit is set at 95% confidence level on the pair production cross section of $ {{{\mathrm{t}{}^{*}}} {{\mathrm{\bar{t}}{}^{*}}} } $, as a function of the $ {{\mathrm{t}{}^{*}}} $ mass. Interpreting the results in the framework of a spin-3/2 $ {{\mathrm{t}{}^{*}}} $ model, assuming a 100% branching fraction of its decay into a top quark and a gluon, $ {{\mathrm{t}{}^{*}}} $ masses below 1.2 TeV are excluded. These are the best limits to date on the mass of spin-3/2 excited top quarks and the first at 13 TeV.
References
1 H. Georgi, L. Kaplan, D. Morin, and A. Schenk Effects of top quark compositeness PRD 51 (1995) 3888 hep-ph/9410307
2 B. Lillie, J. Shu, and T. M. P. Tait Top compositeness at the Tevatron and LHC JHEP 04 (2008) 87 0712.3057
3 A. Pomarol and J. Serra Top quark compositeness: feasibility and implications PRD 78 (2008) 74 0806.3247
4 K. Kumar, T. M. P. Tait, and R. Vega-Morales Manifestations of top compositeness at colliders JHEP 05 (2009) 22 0901.3808
5 U. Baur, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Excited-quark and -lepton production at hadron colliders PRD 42 (1990) 815
6 R. M. Harris Discovery mass reach for excited quarks at hadron colliders in 1996 DPF / DPB Summer Study On New Directions For High-Energy Physics: Proceedings, Snowmass 1996, volume C960625 1996 hep-ph/9609319
7 ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments PL14 (2015) 191803 1503.07589
8 CMS Collaboration Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 30 CMS-HIG-12-028
1207.7235
9 ATLAS Collaboration Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PLB 716 (2012) 1 1207.7214
10 L. Randall and R. Sundrum An alternative to compactification PL3 (1999) 4690
11 L. Randall and R. Sundrum Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension PL3 (1999) 3370
12 B. Hassanain, J. March-Russell, and J. G. Rosa On the possibility of light string resonances at the LHC and Tevatron from Randall-Sundrum throats JHEP 07 (2009) 77 0904.4108
13 W. Rarita and J. Schwinger On a theory of particles with half-integral spin PR60 (1941) 61
14 W. J. Stirling and E. Vryonidou Effect of spin-3/2 top quark excitation on $ \mathrm{t\bar{t}} $ production at the LHC JHEP 01 (2012) 55 1110.1565
15 D. A. Dicus, D. Karabacak, S. Nandi, and S. K. Rai Search for spin-$ 3/2 $ quarks at the Large Hadron Collider PRD 87 (2013) 15023 1208.5811
16 B. Moussallam and V. Soni Production of heavy spin-3/2 fermions in colliders PRD 39 (1989) 1883
17 CMS Collaboration Search for pair production of excited top quarks in the lepton+jets final state JHEP 06 (2014) 125 CMS-B2G-12-014
1311.5357
18 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) CMS-00-001
19 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
20 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 40 1410.8849
21 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
22 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
23 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 40 hep-ph/0409146
24 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 70 0709.2092
25 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 43 1002.2581
26 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, P. Nason, and E. Re Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers JHEP 04 (2015) 114 1412.1828
27 H. B. Hartanto, B. Jager, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX PRD 91 (2015) 94003 1501.04498
28 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
29 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
30 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
31 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 63 0802.1189
32 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) P02014 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
33 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) P04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
34 CMS Collaboration Identification of b quark jets at the CMS experiment in the LHC Run 2 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001
35 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
36 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JINST 7 (2012) 10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
37 CMS Collaboration Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
38 Particle Data Group, C. Patrignani et al. Review of particle physics CPC 40 (2016) 100001
39 K. Cranmer Kernel estimation in high-energy physics CPC 136 (2001) 198
40 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001
41 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC PRL 117 (2016) 182002 1606.02625
42 T. Junk Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics NIMA 434 (1999) 435 hep-ex/9902006
43 A. L. Read Presentation of search results: the $ \text{CL}_\text{s} $ technique JPG 28 (2002) 2693
44 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics EPJC 71 (2011) 1554 1007.1727
45 ATLAS and CMS Collaboration Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in summer 2011 CMS-NOTE-2011/005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-011
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN