CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-FSQ-16-012
Measurement of light-by-light scattering in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV
Abstract: A measurement of light-by-light scattering, $\gamma\gamma\to\gamma\gamma$, in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at a centre-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of 5.02 TeV is reported. The analysis is conducted using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 390 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC. Light-by-light scattering processes are selected in events with two photons exclusively produced, each with transverse energy $\mathrm{E}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma} > $ 2 GeV, pseudorapidity $|\eta^{\gamma}| < $ 2.4, diphoton invariant mass $\mathrm{m}^{\gamma\gamma} > $ 5 GeV, diphoton transverse momentum $\mathrm{p}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\gamma\gamma} < $ 1 GeV, and diphoton acoplanarity below 0.01. After all selection criteria are applied, 14 events are observed, compared to expectations of 11.1 $\pm$ 1.1 (th) events for the signal and 3.8 $\pm$ 1.3 (stat) for the background processes. The significance of the light-by-light signal against the background-only hypothesis is 4.1 standard deviations. The measured fiducial light-by-light scattering cross section, $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}} (\gamma\gamma\to\gamma\gamma)=$ 122 $\pm$ 46 (stat) $ \pm $ 29 (syst) $ \pm $ 4 (th) is consistent with the standard model prediction.
Figures & Tables Summary Additional Figures References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Schematic diagrams of light-by-light scattering ($\gamma \gamma \to \gamma \gamma $, left), QED dielectron production ($\gamma \gamma \to {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$, centre), and central exclusive diphoton production ($ {\mathrm {g}} {\mathrm {g}} \to \gamma \gamma $, right) in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions (where the * superindex indicates a potential electromagnetic excitation of the outgoing ions).

png pdf
Figure 2:
Acoplanarity distribution of QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ events measured in data (circles), compared to the expected distribution in the STARLIGHT MC simulation (histogram), scaled as described in the text. The curve shows a $\chi ^2$ fit to the sum of two exponential distributions corresponding to exclusive $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ plus any residual (non acoplanar) background pairs. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. Error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties, hashed bands around the histogram include systematic and MC statistical uncertainties added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Comparison of data (circles) and STARLIGHT MC expectation (histogram, scaled as described in the text) for exclusive $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ events passing all selection criteria, as a function of dielectron acoplanarity (top left), mass (top right), $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ (bottom left), and rapidity (bottom right). Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. Error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties, hashed bands around the histograms include systematic and MC statistical uncertainties added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Comparison of data (circles) and STARLIGHT MC expectation (histogram, scaled as described in the text) for exclusive $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ events passing all selection criteria, as a function of dielectron acoplanarity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. Error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties, hashed bands around the histograms include systematic and MC statistical uncertainties added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Comparison of data (circles) and STARLIGHT MC expectation (histogram, scaled as described in the text) for exclusive $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ events passing all selection criteria, as a function of dielectron mass. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. Error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties, hashed bands around the histograms include systematic and MC statistical uncertainties added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 3-c:
Comparison of data (circles) and STARLIGHT MC expectation (histogram, scaled as described in the text) for exclusive $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ events passing all selection criteria, as a function of dielectron $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. Error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties, hashed bands around the histograms include systematic and MC statistical uncertainties added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 3-d:
Comparison of data (circles) and STARLIGHT MC expectation (histogram, scaled as described in the text) for exclusive $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ events passing all selection criteria, as a function of dielectron rapidity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. Error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties, hashed bands around the histograms include systematic and MC statistical uncertainties added in quadrature.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Diphoton acoplanarity distribution for exclusive events measured in the data after selection criteria (squares), compared to the expected LbyL signal (red histogram), QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ (yellow histogram), and the CEP+other (light blue histogram, scaled to match the data in the $\text {Aco} > $ 0.02 region as described in the text) backgrounds. Signal and QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC samples are scaled according to their theoretical cross sections and integrated luminosity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. The error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Distributions of the photon ${E_{\mathrm {T}}}$, $\eta $ and $\phi $, as well as diphoton $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $, rapidity and invariant mass measured for exclusive events passing all selection criteria (squares), compared to the expectations of LbyL signal (red histogram), QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC predictions (yellow histogram), and the CEP plus other backgrounds (light blue histogram, scaled to match the data in the $\text {Aco} > 0.02$ region). Signal and QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC samples are scaled according to their theoretical cross sections and integrated luminosity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. The error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distribution of the photon ${E_{\mathrm {T}}}$ measured for exclusive events passing all selection criteria (squares), compared to the expectations of LbyL signal (red histogram), QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC predictions (yellow histogram), and the CEP plus other backgrounds (light blue histogram, scaled to match the data in the $\text {Aco} > 0.02$ region). Signal and QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC samples are scaled according to their theoretical cross sections and integrated luminosity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. The error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distribution of the photon $\eta $ measured for exclusive events passing all selection criteria (squares), compared to the expectations of LbyL signal (red histogram), QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC predictions (yellow histogram), and the CEP plus other backgrounds (light blue histogram, scaled to match the data in the $\text {Aco} > 0.02$ region). Signal and QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC samples are scaled according to their theoretical cross sections and integrated luminosity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. The error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Distribution of the photon $\phi $ measured for exclusive events passing all selection criteria (squares), compared to the expectations of LbyL signal (red histogram), QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC predictions (yellow histogram), and the CEP plus other backgrounds (light blue histogram, scaled to match the data in the $\text {Aco} > 0.02$ region). Signal and QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC samples are scaled according to their theoretical cross sections and integrated luminosity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. The error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Distribution of the diphoton $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ measured for exclusive events passing all selection criteria (squares), compared to the expectations of LbyL signal (red histogram), QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC predictions (yellow histogram), and the CEP plus other backgrounds (light blue histogram, scaled to match the data in the $\text {Aco} > 0.02$ region). Signal and QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC samples are scaled according to their theoretical cross sections and integrated luminosity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. The error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-e:
Distribution of the diphoton rapidity measured for exclusive events passing all selection criteria (squares), compared to the expectations of LbyL signal (red histogram), QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC predictions (yellow histogram), and the CEP plus other backgrounds (light blue histogram, scaled to match the data in the $\text {Aco} > 0.02$ region). Signal and QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC samples are scaled according to their theoretical cross sections and integrated luminosity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. The error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-f:
Distribution of the diphoton invariant mass measured for exclusive events passing all selection criteria (squares), compared to the expectations of LbyL signal (red histogram), QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC predictions (yellow histogram), and the CEP plus other backgrounds (light blue histogram, scaled to match the data in the $\text {Aco} > 0.02$ region). Signal and QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC samples are scaled according to their theoretical cross sections and integrated luminosity. Data and simulations are uncorrected for detector effects. The error bars around the data points indicate statistical uncertainties.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Number of diphoton candidates measured in data and expected from the LbyL and QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ MC generators, and from the CEP+other contributions, after each event selection step. The yields of the simulated processes are scaled according to their theoretical cross sections and the integrated luminosity of the analysed data set. The "CEP+other'' values are normalised from the high-acoplanarity tail with a scale factor estimated from the data as described in the text. The LbyL MC uncertainty quoted is that of the theoretical uncertainty of the prediction, whereas the uncertainties in the QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ and CEP+others counts are statistical.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the overall cross section efficiencies $C^{{\gamma \gamma},\text {ee}}$, MC-driven efficiencies $\text {Eff}^{{\gamma \gamma},\text {ee}}$, and individual data-to-MC scale factors $\text {SF}^{{\gamma \gamma},\text {ee}}$, obtained for the diphoton and dielectron analyses.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the ratio of the fiducial LbyL to total QED $ {\mathrm {e}}^+ {\mathrm {e}}^-$ cross sections.
Summary
A study of elastic light-by-light (LbyL) scattering, $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$, in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at a centre-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of 5.02 TeV has been presented, based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 390 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2015. Fourteen LbyL candidates passing all selection requirements are observed, with photon $ E_{\mathrm{T}} > $ 2 GeV and pseudorapidity $| \eta | < $ 2.4, diphoton invariant mass greater than 5 GeV, diphoton transverse momentum lower than 1 GeV and diphoton acoplanarity below 0.01. Both the yield and the kinematic distributions are in accord with the expectations from the expected LbyL signal plus small residual backgrounds, mostly from misidentified exclusive dielectron, ${\gamma\gamma}\to\mathrm{e}^+\mathrm{e}^-$, and central exclusive diphoton, $\mathrm{gg}\to {\gamma\gamma}$, production. The observed (expected) significance of the light-by-light signal over the background-only expectation is of 4.1 (4.4) standard deviations. The measured fiducial light-by-light scattering cross section, $\sigma_\text{fid} (\gamma\gamma \to \gamma\gamma) = $ 122 $\pm$ 46 (stat) $\pm$ 29 (syst) $\pm$ 4 (th) nb, is consistent with the standard model theoretical prediction.
Additional Figures

png pdf
Additional Figure 1:
Event display for a candidate light-by-light event, passing all analysis cuts, in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV.
References
1 R. S. Van Dyck, P. B. Schwinberg, and H. G. Dehmelt New high precision comparison of electron and positron g-factors PRL 59 (1987) 26
2 Muon g-2 Collaboration Precise measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment PRL 86 (2001) 2227 hep-ex/0102017
3 A. I. Milstein and M. Schumacher Present status of Delbruck scattering PR 243 (1994) 183
4 S. L. Adler Photon splitting and photon dispersion in a strong magnetic field Annals Phys. 67 (1971) 599
5 PVLAS Collaboration Limits on low energy photon-photon scattering from an experiment on magnetic vacuum birefringence PRD 78 (2008) 032006 0805.3036
6 G. Jarlskog et al. Measurement of Delbruck scattering and observation of photon splitting at high energies PRD 8 (1973) 3813
7 D. d'Enterria and G. G. da Silveira Observing light-by-light scattering at the Large Hadron Collider PRL 111 (2013) 080405 1305.7142
8 A. J. Baltz et al. The physics of ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC PR 458 (2008) 1 0706.3356
9 C. F. von Weizsacker Radiation emitted in collisions of very fast electrons Z. Phys. 88 (1934) 612
10 E. J. Williams Nature of the high-energy particles of penetrating radiation and status of ionization and radiation formulae PR45 (1934) 729
11 E. Fermi On the theory of collisions between atoms and electrically charged particles Nuovo Cim. 2 (1925) 143 hep-th/0205086
12 CMS Collaboration Exclusive photon-photon production of muon pairs in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 01 (2012) 052 CMS-FWD-10-005
1111.5536
13 CMS Collaboration Search for exclusive or semi-exclusive photon pair production and observation of exclusive and semi-exclusive electron pair production in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JHEP 11 (2012) 080 CMS-FWD-11-004
1209.1666
14 ALICE Collaboration Coherent $ J/\psi $ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 2.76 TeV PLB 718 (2013) 1273 1209.3715
15 ALICE Collaboration Charmonium and $ e^+e^- $ pair photoproduction at mid-rapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 2.76 TeV EPJC 73 (2013) 2617 1305.1467
16 ALICE Collaboration Exclusive $ \mathrm{J/}\psi $ photoproduction off protons in ultra-peripheral p-Pb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}= $ 5.02 TeV PRL 113 (2014) 232504 1406.7819
17 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of exclusive $ \gamma\gamma\rightarrow \ell^+\ell^- $ production in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 749 (2015) 242 1506.07098
18 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of the exclusive $ \gamma \gamma \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^- $ process in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 777 (2018) 303 1708.04053
19 LHCb Collaboration Exclusive $ J/\psi $ and $ \psi $(2s) production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV JPG 40 (2013) 045001 1301.7084
20 LHCb Collaboration Updated measurements of exclusive $ J/\psi $ and $ \psi $(2s) production cross-sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV JPG 41 (2014) 055002 1401.3288
21 CMS Collaboration Study of exclusive two-photon production of $ w^+w^- $ in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings JHEP 07 (2013) 116 CMS-FSQ-12-010
1305.5596
22 CMS Collaboration Evidence for exclusive $ \gamma\gamma \to W^+ W^- $ production and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 and 8 TeV JHEP 08 (2016) 119 CMS-FSQ-13-008
1604.04464
23 ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of exclusive $ \gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^- $ production and search for exclusive higgs boson production in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector PRD 94 (2016) 032011 1607.03745
24 ATLAS Collaboration Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC NP 13 (2017) 852 1702.01625
25 V. A. Khoze, A. D. Martin, M. G. Ryskin, and W. J. Stirling Diffractive $ \gamma\gamma $ production at hadron colliders EPJC 38 (2005) 475 hep-ph/0409037
26 I. F. Ginzburg and A. Schiller Search for a heavy magnetic monopole at the Tevatron and CERN LHC PRD 57 (1998) 6599 hep-ph/9802310
27 S. Fichet et al. Light-by-light scattering with intact protons at the LHC: from standard model to new physics JHEP 02 (2015) 165 1411.6629
28 S. Fichet Shining light on polarizable dark particles JHEP 04 (2017) 088 1609.01762
29 S. Knapen, T. Lin, H. K. Lou, and T. Melia Searching for axionlike particles with ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions PRL 118 (2017) 171801 1607.06083
30 H. Sun Large extra dimension effects through light-by-light scattering at the CERN LHC EPJC 74 (2014) 2977 1406.3897
31 J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and T. You Light-by-light scattering constraint on Born-Infeld theory PRL 118 (2017) 261802 1703.08450
32 E. Chapon, C. Royon, and O. Kepka Anomalous quartic $ WW\gamma\gamma, ZZ\gamma\gamma $, and trilinear $ WW\gamma $ couplings in two-photon processes at high luminosity at the LHC PRD 81 (2010) 074003 0912.5161
33 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
34 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
35 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
36 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
37 D. d'Enterria and J.-P. Lansberg Study of Higgs boson production and its $ \mathrm{b\bar{b}} $ decay in $ \gamma\gamma $ processes in proton-nucleus collisions at the LHC PRD 81 (2010) 014004 0909.3047
38 Z. Bern et al. QCD and QED corrections to light by light scattering JHEP 11 (2001) 031 hep-ph/0109079
39 S. R. Klein and J. Nystrand Photoproduction of quarkonium in proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus collisions PRL 92 (2004) 142003 hep-ex/0311164
40 S. R. Klein et al. STARlight: A Monte Carlo simulation program for ultra-peripheral collisions of relativistic ions CPC 212 (2017) 258 1607.03838
41 L. A. Harland-Lang, V. A. Khoze, and M. G. Ryskin Exclusive physics at the LHC with SuperChic 2 EPJC 76 (2016) 9 1508.02718
42 K. J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado EPPS16: Nuclear parton distributions with LHC data EPJC 77 (2017) 163 1612.05741
43 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
44 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
45 CMS Collaboration Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) P08010 CMS-EGM-14-001
1502.02702
46 R. J. Barlow and C. Beeston Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples CPC 77 (1993) 219
47 J. S. Conway Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra in Proceedings, PHYSTAT 2011 Workshop on Statistical Issues Related to Discovery Claims in Search Experiments and Unfolding, CERN,Geneva, Switzerland 17-20 January 2011, p. 115 2011 1103.0354
48 C. Loizides, J. Kamin, and D. d'Enterria Precision Monte Carlo Glauber predictions at present and future nuclear colliders 1710.07098
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN