CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-EXO-24-019
Search for pair production of leptoquarks decaying to electrons and quarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV
Abstract: A search for the pair production of first-generation leptoquarks is performed using proton-proton collision data recorded at 13 TeV center-of-mass energy with the CMS detector at the LHC. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $ and were collected during the full LHC Run 2. The leptoquarks are assumed to decay promptly to a quark and an electron with branching fraction $ \beta $. The search targets the prompt decay of each leptoquark into an electron and a quark, producing a final state consisting of two electrons and two quarks that are detected as hadronic jets. Scalar leptoquarks decaying to down quarks with $ \beta = $ 1.0 are excluded at the 95% confidence level for masses below 1710 GeV (1755 GeV expected). The data are also interpreted to set exclusion limits on scalar leptoquark decays to bottom quarks, as well as on vector leptoquarks considering the minimal and Yang-Mills coupling scenarios. Vector leptoquarks are excluded at the 95% confidence level for $ \beta = $ 1 below masses of 2110 GeV (2165 GeV expected) for the minimal coupling scenario, and below 2525 GeV (2525 GeV expected) for the Yang-Mills coupling scenario.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Leading order Feynman diagrams for the scalar LQ pair production channels at the LHC.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Leading order Feynman diagrams for the scalar LQ pair production channels at the LHC.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Leading order Feynman diagrams for the scalar LQ pair production channels at the LHC.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Leading order Feynman diagrams for the scalar LQ pair production channels at the LHC.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Leading order Feynman diagrams for the scalar LQ pair production channels at the LHC.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Data and background comparison for events passing the initial selection requirements, shown for a subset of variables used in the boosted decision tree training: $ m_{\mathrm{e}\text{j}}^\text{min} $ (left), $ S_{\mathrm{T}} $ (center), and $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $ (right). ``Other background" includes diboson and single top quark processes. Signal predictions for the $ m_{\text{LQ}}= $ 1000 and 1500 GeV hypotheses are overlaid on the plots. The last bin includes all events beyond the upper $ x $-axis boundary. The gray shaded region represents the total (statistical and systematic) background uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Data and background comparison for events passing the initial selection requirements, shown for a subset of variables used in the boosted decision tree training: $ m_{\mathrm{e}\text{j}}^\text{min} $ (left), $ S_{\mathrm{T}} $ (center), and $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $ (right). ``Other background" includes diboson and single top quark processes. Signal predictions for the $ m_{\text{LQ}}= $ 1000 and 1500 GeV hypotheses are overlaid on the plots. The last bin includes all events beyond the upper $ x $-axis boundary. The gray shaded region represents the total (statistical and systematic) background uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Data and background comparison for events passing the initial selection requirements, shown for a subset of variables used in the boosted decision tree training: $ m_{\mathrm{e}\text{j}}^\text{min} $ (left), $ S_{\mathrm{T}} $ (center), and $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $ (right). ``Other background" includes diboson and single top quark processes. Signal predictions for the $ m_{\text{LQ}}= $ 1000 and 1500 GeV hypotheses are overlaid on the plots. The last bin includes all events beyond the upper $ x $-axis boundary. The gray shaded region represents the total (statistical and systematic) background uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
Data and background comparison for events passing the initial selection requirements, shown for a subset of variables used in the boosted decision tree training: $ m_{\mathrm{e}\text{j}}^\text{min} $ (left), $ S_{\mathrm{T}} $ (center), and $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $ (right). ``Other background" includes diboson and single top quark processes. Signal predictions for the $ m_{\text{LQ}}= $ 1000 and 1500 GeV hypotheses are overlaid on the plots. The last bin includes all events beyond the upper $ x $-axis boundary. The gray shaded region represents the total (statistical and systematic) background uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Data and background comparison in the training region for the output of the BDT model trained with signal mass $ m_{\text{LQ}} = $ 1500 GeV. ``Other background" includes diboson and single top quark processes. The signal prediction for the $ m_{\text{LQ}}= $ 1500 GeV hypothesis is overlaid on the plot. The last bin includes all events beyond the upper $ x $-axis boundary.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Background rejection (1 - efficiency) of the $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $ $ > $ $ m_{\text{LQ}} $ selection and signal efficiency and background rejection of the optimal BDT score selection for each $ m_{\text{LQ}} $ considered in the analysis. The signal efficiency of the $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $ $ > $ $ m_{\text{LQ}} $ selection is omitted from the plot because the difference from 1 is negligible for all masses. Note that the BDT cut is applied to events remaining after the $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $ cut.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Data and background comparison for events passing the final selection requirements for the $ m_{\text{LQ}} $ of 800 GeV for $ S_{\mathrm{T}} $, $ m_{\mathrm{e}\text{j}}^\text{min} $, and $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $. ``Other background" includes diboson and single top quark. The signal prediction for the $ m_{\text{LQ}}= $ 800 GeV hypothesis is overlaid on the plots. The last bin includes all events beyond the upper $ x $-axis boundary.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Data and background comparison for events passing the final selection requirements for the $ m_{\text{LQ}} $ of 800 GeV for $ S_{\mathrm{T}} $, $ m_{\mathrm{e}\text{j}}^\text{min} $, and $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $. ``Other background" includes diboson and single top quark. The signal prediction for the $ m_{\text{LQ}}= $ 800 GeV hypothesis is overlaid on the plots. The last bin includes all events beyond the upper $ x $-axis boundary.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Data and background comparison for events passing the final selection requirements for the $ m_{\text{LQ}} $ of 800 GeV for $ S_{\mathrm{T}} $, $ m_{\mathrm{e}\text{j}}^\text{min} $, and $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $. ``Other background" includes diboson and single top quark. The signal prediction for the $ m_{\text{LQ}}= $ 800 GeV hypothesis is overlaid on the plots. The last bin includes all events beyond the upper $ x $-axis boundary.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Data and background comparison for events passing the final selection requirements for the $ m_{\text{LQ}} $ of 800 GeV for $ S_{\mathrm{T}} $, $ m_{\mathrm{e}\text{j}}^\text{min} $, and $ m_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\text{j}\text{j}} $. ``Other background" includes diboson and single top quark. The signal prediction for the $ m_{\text{LQ}}= $ 800 GeV hypothesis is overlaid on the plots. The last bin includes all events beyond the upper $ x $-axis boundary.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Upper limits on the scalar leptoquark pair-production cross section times $ \beta^{2} $ at the 95% confidence level for the light quark decay channel. The green and yellow bands represent the 68% and 95% confidence intervals on the expected limits.

png pdf
Figure 7:
Lower mass limits on the scalar leptoquark at the 95% confidence level for a range of $ \beta $ values for the light quark decay channel. The green and yellow bands represent the 68% and 95% confidence intervals on the expected limits.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Effect of systematic uncertainties in the signal and background yields for the $ m_{\text{LQ}} = $ 1500 GeV hypothesis.

png pdf
Table A1:
Event yields after applying the optimized BDT selection criteria and performing a signal plus background fit. Uncertainties are total statistical plus systematic, except for the total background, for which statistical and systematic uncertainties are given separately.
Summary
A search has been performed for pair production of scalar leptoquarks that couple to an electron and a quark using Run 2 (2016--2018) proton-proton collision data collected at 13 TeV center-of-mass energy with the CMS detector at the LHC, and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$ ^{-1} $. The data are found to be in agreement with standard model background expectations and a lower limit at 95% confidence level is set on the scalar leptoquark mass at 1710 or 1700 GeV (expected 1755 or 1745 GeV) for $ \beta= $ 1.0, where $ \beta $ is the branching fraction of the leptoquark decay to an electron and a light or a b quark, respectively. The results are reinterpreted to set limits on the vector leptoquark pair production in the minimal and Yang-Mills coupling scenarios, setting lower mass limits of 2110 or 2525 GeV (expected 2165 or 2525 GeV), respectively, for $ \beta= $ 1.0.
References
1 J. C. Pati and A. Salam Unified lepton-hadron symmetry and a gauge theory of the basic interactions PRD 8 (1973) 1240
2 J. C. Pati and A. Salam Lepton number as the fourth `color' PRD 10 (1974) 275
3 H. Georgi and S. Glashow Unity of all elementary-particle forces PRL 32 (1974) 438
4 H. Murayama and T. Yanagida A viable SU(5) GUT with light leptoquark bosons Mod. Phys. Lett. A 07 (1992) 147
5 H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 193
6 G. Senjanovic and A. Sokorac Light lepto-quarks in SO(10) Z. Phys. C 20 (1983) 255
7 P. H. Frampton and B.-H. Lee SU(15) grand unification PRL 64 (1990) 619
8 P. H. Frampton and T. W. Kephart Higgs sector and proton decay in SU(15) grand unification PRD 42 (1990) 3892
9 S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind Mass without scalars NPB 155 (1979) 237
10 S. Dimopoulos Technicoloured signatures NPB 168 (1980) 69
11 E. Eichten and K. Lane Dynamical breaking of weak interaction symmetries PLB 90 (1980) 125
12 J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo Low-energy phenomenology of superstring-inspired E$ _{6} $ models Phys. Rept. 183 193, 1989
13 B. Schrempp and F. Schrempp Light leptoquarks PLB 153 (1985) 101
14 W. Buchmuller, R. Ruckl, and D. Wyler Leptoquarks in lepton-quark collisions PLB 191 (1987) 442
15 M. Kuze and Y. Sirois Search for particles and forces beyond the standard model in high energy lepton-hadron and hadron-hadron collisions Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 50 (2003) no. 1, 1 hep-ex/0211048
16 I. Dorvsner et al. Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders Phys. Rep. 641 (2016) 1 1603.04993
17 B. Diaz, M. Schmaltz, and Y.-M. Zhong The leptoquark Hunter's guide: Pair production JHEP 10 (2017) 097 1706.05033
18 D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori, and D. Marzocca B-physics anomalies: a guide to combined explanations JHEP 11 (2017) 44 1706.07808
19 L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, and T. Li Model of vector leptoquarks in view of the $ B $-physics anomalies PRD 98 (2018) 115002 1709.00692
20 G. Hiller, D. Loose, and I. Nivs and Vzic Flavorful leptoquarks at hadron colliders PRD 97 (2018) 075004 1801.09399
21 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay $ {\mathrm{B}^0}\to\mathrm{K}^{*0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-} $ PRL 111 (2013) 191801 1308.1707
22 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton universality using $ {\mathrm{B}^{+}}\to \mathrm{K^+}\ell^{+}\ell^{-} $ decays PRL 113 (2014) 151601 1406.6482
23 LHCb Collaboration Angular analysis of the $ {\mathrm{B}^0}\to\mathrm{K}^{*0}\mu^{+} \mu^{-} $ decay using 3 fb$ ^{-1} $ of integrated luminosity JHEP 02 (2016) 104 1512.04442
24 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton universality with $ {\mathrm{B}^0}\to \mathrm{K}^{*0}\ell^{+}\ell^{-} $ decays JHEP 08 (2017) 055 1705.05802
25 Belle Collaboration Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of $ {\mathrm{B}}\to\mathrm{K}^{*} \ell^+ \ell^- $ PRL 118 (2017) 111801 1612.05014
26 BaBar Collaboration Evidence for an excess of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(*)} \tau^-\bar{\nu}_ \tau $ decays PRL 109 (2012) 101802 1205.5442
27 BaBar Collaboration Measurement of an excess of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(*)}\tau^- \bar{\nu}_ \tau $ decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons PRD 88 (2013) 072012 1303.0571
28 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the branching ratio of $ \bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \tau ^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ relative to $ \bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \ell^- \bar{ \nu}_\ell $ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle PRD 92 (2015) 072014 1507.03233
29 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the $ \tau $ lepton polarization and $ R(D^*) $ in the decay $ \bar{B} \to D^* \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ PRL 118 (2017) 211801 1612.00529
30 Belle Collaboration Measurement of the $ \tau $ lepton polarization and $ R(D^*) $ in the decay $ \bar{B} \rightarrow D^* \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau $ with one-prong hadronic $ \tau $ decays at Belle PRD 97 (2018) 012004 1709.00129
31 Belle Collaboration Measurement of $ \mathcal{R}(D) $ and $ \mathcal{R}(D^*) $ with a semileptonic tagging method PRL 124 (2020) 161803 1910.05864
32 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $ \mathcal{B}(\bar{ B}^0 \to D^{*+}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^0 \to D^{*+}\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\mu}) $ PRL 115 (2015) 111803 1506.08614
33 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of the $ B^0 \to D^{*-} \tau^+ \nu_{\tau} $ and $ B^0 \to D^{*-} \mu^+ \nu_{\mu} $ branching fractions using three-prong $ \tau $-lepton decays PRL 120 (2018) 171802 1708.08856
34 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton flavor universality by the measurement of the $ B^0 \to D^{*-} \tau^+ \nu_{\tau} $ branching fraction using three-prong $ \tau $ decays PRD 97 (2018) 072013 1711.02505
35 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $ \mathcal{B}(B_c^+ \to J/\psi\tau^+\nu_\tau) $/$ \mathcal{B}(B_c^+ \to J/\psi\mu^+ \nu_\mu) $ PRL 120 (2018) 121801 1711.05623
36 LHCb Collaboration Test of lepton flavor universality using $ B^0 \to D^{*-}\tau^+\nu_ {\tau} $ decays with hadronic $ \tau $ channels PRD 108 (2023) 012018 2305.01463
37 LHCb Collaboration Measurement of the ratios of branching fractions $ \mathcal{R}(D^{* }) $ and $ \mathcal{R}(D^{0}) $ PRL 131 (2023) 111802 2302.02886
38 R. Barbier et al. $ R $-parity-violating supersymmetry Phys. Rept. 420 (2005) 1 hep-ph/0406039
39 OPAL Collaboration Search for pair produced leptoquarks in $ e^{+} e^{-} $ interactions at $ \sqrt{s} $ approximately = 189-GeV to 209-GeV EPJC 31 (2003) 281 hep-ex/0305053
40 ZEUS Collaboration Search for resonance decays to lepton+jet at DESY HERA and limits on leptoquarks PRD 68 (2003) 052004 hep-ex/0304008
41 H1 Collaboration Search for first generation leptoquarks in $ \mathrm{e}\mathrm{p} $ collisions at HERA PLB 704 (2011) 388 1107.3716
42 CDF Collaboration Search for first-generation scalar leptoquarks in $ \mathrm{p}\overline{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PRD 72 (2005) 051107 hep-ex/0506074
43 D0 Collaboration Search for pair production of first-generation leptoquarks in $ \mathrm{p} \overline{\mathrm{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 1.96 TeV PLB 681 (2009) 224 0907.1048
44 CMS Collaboration Search for Pair Production of First-Generation Scalar Leptoquarks in $ pp $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PRL 106 (2011) 201802 CMS-EXO-10-005
1012.4031
45 CMS Collaboration Search for First Generation Scalar Leptoquarks in the e$ \nu $jj channel in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PLB 703 (2011) 246 CMS-EXO-10-006
1105.5237
46 CMS Collaboration Search for Pair Production of First- and Second-Generation Scalar Leptoquarks in $ pp $ Collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV PRD 86 (2012) 052013 CMS-EXO-11-028
1207.5406
47 CMS Collaboration Search for pair production of first and second generation leptoquarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV PRD 93 (2016) no. 3, 03 CMS-EXO-12-041
1509.03744
48 CMS Collaboration Search for pair production of first-generation scalar leptoquarks at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV PRD 99 (2019) no. 5, 05 CMS-EXO-17-009
1811.01197
49 ATLAS Collaboration Search for pair production of first or second generation leptoquarks in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC PRD 83 (2011) 112006 1104.4481
50 ATLAS Collaboration Search for first generation scalar leptoquarks in $ pp $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector PLB 709 (2012) 158 1112.4828
51 ATLAS Collaboration Searches for scalar leptoquarks in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector EPJC 76 (2016) no. 1, 5 1508.04735
52 ATLAS Collaboration Search for scalar leptoquarks in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment New J. Phys. 18 (2016) no. 9, 093016 1605.06035
53 ATLAS Collaboration Searches for scalar leptoquarks and differential cross-section measurements in dilepton-dijet events in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment EPJC 79 (2019) no. 9, 733 1902.00377
54 ATLAS Collaboration Search for pairs of scalar leptoquarks decaying into quarks and electrons or muons in $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV $ pp $ collisions with the ATLAS detector JHEP 10 (2020) 112 2006.05872
55 ATLAS Collaboration Search for resonant leptoquark production via lepton-jet signatures in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV and $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13.6 TeV with the ATLAS detector JHEP 12 (2025) 180 2507.03650
56 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004
57 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS EPJC 81 (2021) 800 CMS-LUM-17-003
2104.01927
58 CMS Collaboration Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV with the CMS detector CMS Physics Analysis Summary, 2025
CMS-PAS-LUM-20-001
CMS-PAS-LUM-20-001
59 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system Journal of Instrumentation 1 (2017) 2 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
60 S. Frixione and B. R. Webber Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations JHEP 06 (2002) 029 hep-ph/0204244
61 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
62 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
63 I. Dor \v s ner and A. Greljo Leptoquark toolbox for precision collider studies JHEP 05 (2018) 126 1801.07641
64 M. Kr ä mer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at the CERN LHC PRD 71 (2005) 057503 hep-ph/0411038
65 T. Mandal, S. Mitra, and S. Seth Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at the LHC to NLO parton shower accuracy PRD 93 (2016) 035018 1506.07369
66 J. Butterworth et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II JPG 43 (2016) 023001 1510.03865
67 J. Blumlein, E. Boos, and A. Kryukov Leptoquark pair production in hadronic interactions Z. Phys. C 76 (1997) 137 hep-ph/9610408
68 R. Frederix and S. Frixione Merging meets matching in MC@NLO JHEP 12 (2012) 061 1209.6215
69 S. Kallweit et al. NLO electroweak automation and precise predictions for W+multijet production at the LHC JHEP 04 (2015) 012 1412.5157
70 S. Kallweit et al. NLO QCD+EW automation and precise predictions for V+multijet production in 50th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, 2015 1505.05704
71 S. Kallweit et al. NLO QCD+EW predictions for V + jets including off-shell vector-boson decays and multijet merging JHEP 04 (2016) 021 1511.08692
72 J. M. Lindert et al. Precise predictions for $ \mathrm{V}+ $ jets dark matter backgrounds EPJC 77 (2017) 829 1705.04664
73 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: The POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
74 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG JHEP 07 (2008) 060 0805.4802
75 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
76 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: The POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
77 T. Melia, P. Nason, R. Rontsch, and G. Zanderighi W+W-, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX JHEP 11 (2011) 078 1107.5051
78 P. Nason and G. Zanderighi $ W^+ W^- $, $ W Z $ and $ Z Z $ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2 EPJC 74 (2014) no. 1, 2702 1311.1365
79 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi A Positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction JHEP 09 (2007) 126 0707.3088
80 T. Sjöstrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
81 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT 4---A simulation toolkit NIM A 506 (2003) 250
82 J. Allison et al. GEANT 4 developments and applications IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270
83 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
84 CMS Collaboration Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 16 (2021) no. 05, P05014 CMS-EGM-17-001
2012.06888
85 CMS Collaboration Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV JINST 12 (2017) no. 02, P0 CMS-JME-13-004
1607.03663
86 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) no. 10, P3 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
87 CMS Collaboration Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015
CDS
88 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_{\mathrm{T}} $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
89 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
90 CMS Collaboration Performance of Electron Reconstruction and Selection with the CMS Detector in Proton-Proton Collisions at \ensuremath\sqrts = 8 TeV JINST 10 (2015) no. 06, P06005 CMS-EGM-13-001
1502.02701
91 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) P06015 CMS-MUO-16-001
1804.04528
92 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions (December, ) 473, 2007
The European Physical Journal C 5 (2007) 3
0706.2569
93 G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics (February, ), 2011
The European Physical Journal C 7 (2011) 1
1007.1727
94 E. Bols et al. Jet flavour classification using DeepJet (December, ) P1, 2020
Journal of Instrumentation 1 (2020) 5
2008.10519
95 CMS Collaboration Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with the CMS detector CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2023-005, March,, 2023
CDS
96 CMS Collaboration Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV JINST 13 (2018) no. 05, P05011 CMS-BTV-16-002
1712.07158
97 CMS Collaboration Search for physics beyond the standard model in dilepton mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV Journal of High Energy Physics 201 (2015) 5 CMS-EXO-12-061
1412.6302
98 D. Bourilkov, R. C. Group, and M. R. Whalley LHAPDF: PDF use from the tevatron to the LHC link
99 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{ s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
100 CMS Collaboration Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV JINST 15 (2020) no. 10, P7 CMS-TRG-17-001
2006.10165
101 CMS Collaboration The CMS Statistical Analysis and Combination Tool: Combine Computing and Software for Big Science 8 (November, ), 2024
link
CMS-CAT-23-001
2404.06614
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN