Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-TOP-15-014
Measurement of the top quark mass in tˉt events with a J/ψ from pp collisions at 8 TeV
Abstract: The first measurement of the top quark mass using top quark decays in the exclusive decay channel t(Wν), (bJ/ψ+Xμ+μ+X) is presented. Top quark pair events in proton-proton collisions recorded with the CMS detector at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV are selected. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb1 and yields 666 tˉt events containing one J/ψ candidate in which the J/ψ decays into an opposite sign muon pair. The mass of the (J/ψ+) system, where is an electron or a muon from the W boson decay, is used to extract a top quark mass of Mt= 173.5 ± 3.0 (stat) ± 0.9 (syst) GeV.
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Pictorial view of an exclusive J/ψ production in a tˉt system.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Numbers of events selected in data and Monte Carlo simulations, in each channel. Processes are normalized to their theoretical cross section. The lower inset shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data over the number of events expected from simulations.

png pdf
Figure 3:
Dimuon invariant mass between 2.8 and 3.4 GeV. Processes are normalized to their theoretical cross section. The lower inset shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data over the number of events expected from simulations.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Distributions of reconstructed J/ψμ+μ candidate properties: transverse momentum (a), and mass(b). Processes are normalized to their theoretical cross section. The lower inset shows the ratio of the observed over the expected distributions.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Distributions of reconstructed J/ψμ+μ candidate properties: transverse momentum (a), and mass(b). Processes are normalized to their theoretical cross section. The lower inset shows the ratio of the observed over the expected distributions.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Distributions of the distance in the (η,ϕ) plane between the reconstructed J/ψ candidate and the leading lepton (a,b), and of the invariant mass (c,d) of their combination, in the μ/μμ/μe+jets channel (a,c) and in the e/ee/eμ+jets channel (b,d). Processes are normalized to their theoretical cross section. The lower inset shows the ratio of the observed over the expected distributions.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Distributions of the distance in the (η,ϕ) plane between the reconstructed J/ψ candidate and the leading lepton (a,b), and of the invariant mass (c,d) of their combination, in the μ/μμ/μe+jets channel (a,c) and in the e/ee/eμ+jets channel (b,d). Processes are normalized to their theoretical cross section. The lower inset shows the ratio of the observed over the expected distributions.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Distributions of the distance in the (η,ϕ) plane between the reconstructed J/ψ candidate and the leading lepton (a,b), and of the invariant mass (c,d) of their combination, in the μ/μμ/μe+jets channel (a,c) and in the e/ee/eμ+jets channel (b,d). Processes are normalized to their theoretical cross section. The lower inset shows the ratio of the observed over the expected distributions.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Distributions of the distance in the (η,ϕ) plane between the reconstructed J/ψ candidate and the leading lepton (a,b), and of the invariant mass (c,d) of their combination, in the μ/μμ/μe+jets channel (a,c) and in the e/ee/eμ+jets channel (b,d). Processes are normalized to their theoretical cross section. The lower inset shows the ratio of the observed over the expected distributions.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Mean (a) and width (b) of the Gaussian function describing the peak of the MJ/ψ+ distributions, as function of Mt. These are the parameters with the strongest correlation to Mt. Lines are a result of the simultaneous fit decribed in Section 4.1, while superimposed dots are a result of the alternative fit method described in Section 4.2.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Mean (a) and width (b) of the Gaussian function describing the peak of the MJ/ψ+ distributions, as function of Mt. These are the parameters with the strongest correlation to Mt. Lines are a result of the simultaneous fit decribed in Section 4.1, while superimposed dots are a result of the alternative fit method described in Section 4.2.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
Residual (a) and pull (b) distributions for 3 000 pseudoexperiments generated from P_\mathrm  {sig+bg}|_{M_\mathrm  {t}= 172.5 GeV and fitted with Psig+bg.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
Residual (a) and pull (b) distributions for 3 000 pseudoexperiments generated from P_\mathrm  {sig+bg}|_{M_\mathrm  {t}= 172.5 GeV and fitted with Psig+bg.

png pdf
Figure 8:
Ratio of the pT of the B hadrons to the pT of the matched generator level jet for the Z2rbLEP tune (a), the Z2 tune (b), and the variations of the Z2rbLEP tune (b) and the P12 tune (c).

png pdf
Figure 9:
Dependence of extracted Mt value on the average fragmentation <pTgen(B)/pTgen(jet)>, fitted with a 1st order polynomial function.

png pdf
Figure 10:
Fit of the leading lepton-J/ψ candidate invariant mass with Psig+bg. The inset shows the scan of the log likelihood as a function of the only free parameter which is Mt.

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
Display of the reconstructed tracks (green lines), calorimeter energy deposits (red for ECAL, blue for HCAL), jets (orange cones), muons (red lines) and missing transverse energy (red arrow) in one event selected in data, in which a pair of opposite sign secondary muons with a mass close to the J/ψ is reconstructed within a jet. The positive and the negative muons are bent away from each other by the solenoidal magnetic field.

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
Display of the reconstructed tracks (green lines), calorimeter energy deposits (red for ECAL, blue for HCAL), jets (orange cones), muons (red lines) and missing transverse energy (red arrow) in one event selected in data, in which a pair of opposite sign secondary muons with a mass close to the J/ψ is reconstructed within a jet. The positive and the negative muons are bent away from each other by the solenoidal magnetic field.

png pdf
Figure 11-c:
Display of the reconstructed tracks (green lines), calorimeter energy deposits (red for ECAL, blue for HCAL), jets (orange cones), muons (red lines) and missing transverse energy (red arrow) in one event selected in data, in which a pair of opposite sign secondary muons with a mass close to the J/ψ is reconstructed within a jet. The positive and the negative muons are bent away from each other by the solenoidal magnetic field.

png pdf
Figure 12-a:
Display of the reconstructed tracks (green lines), calorimeter energy deposits (red for ECAL, blue for HCAL), jets (orange cones), muons (red lines) and missing transverse energy (red arrow) in one event selected in data, in which a pair of opposite sign secondary muons with a mass close to the J/ψ is reconstructed within a jet. The positive and the negative muons are emitted in such a way that they are bent by the solenoidal magnetic field back together.

png pdf
Figure 12-b:
Display of the reconstructed tracks (green lines), calorimeter energy deposits (red for ECAL, blue for HCAL), jets (orange cones), muons (red lines) and missing transverse energy (red arrow) in one event selected in data, in which a pair of opposite sign secondary muons with a mass close to the J/ψ is reconstructed within a jet. The positive and the negative muons are emitted in such a way that they are bent by the solenoidal magnetic field back together.

png pdf
Figure 12-c:
Display of the reconstructed tracks (green lines), calorimeter energy deposits (red for ECAL, blue for HCAL), jets (orange cones), muons (red lines) and missing transverse energy (red arrow) in one event selected in data, in which a pair of opposite sign secondary muons with a mass close to the J/ψ is reconstructed within a jet. The positive and the negative muons are emitted in such a way that they are bent by the solenoidal magnetic field back together.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Number of selected events from MC simulations and observed in data for the electron and muon channels for 19.7 fb1. The quoted uncertainties are of statistical nature.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the top quark mass for each source.
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN