CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SMP-19-013
Measurements of the pp $\to$ W$^{\pm}\gamma\gamma$ and pp $\to$ Z$\gamma\gamma$ cross sections and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings at $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV
Abstract: The cross section for W or Z boson production in association with two photons is measured in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$ collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC. The $\mathrm{W}(\ell\nu)\gamma\gamma$ and $\mathrm{Z}(\ell\ell)\gamma\gamma$ (where $\ell=$ e, $\mu$) cross sections are extracted in the phase space identified by an electron (muon) transverse momentum threshold of 35 (30) GeV and a photon transverse momentum threshold of 20 GeV. The measured cross sections are $\sigma(\mathrm{W}\gamma\gamma) = $ 13.63 $^{+1.93}_{-1.89}$ (stat.) $^{+4.04}_{-4.02}$ (syst.) $\pm$ 0.08 (PDF+scale) fb and $\sigma(\mathrm{Z}\gamma\gamma) = $ 5.41 $^{+0.58}_{-0.55}$ (stat.) $^{+0.64}_{-0.70}$ (syst.) $\pm$ 0.06 (PDF+scale) fb. Limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings are set in the framework of an effective field theory with dimension-8 operators.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Distribution of the transverse momentum of the diphoton system for the W$\gamma \gamma $ electron (a) and muon (b) channels and for the Z$\gamma \gamma $ electron (c) and muon (d) channels. In the ratio plot, the grey hashed area is the statistical error on the sum of signal and backgrounds while the uncertainty on the black dots is the statistical uncertainty of the data. The expected distribution for an example value of the anomalous coupling parameters $f_{M3}/\Lambda ^4$ and $f_{T0}/\Lambda ^4$ is also shown in blue.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Distribution of the transverse momentum of the diphoton system for the W$\gamma \gamma $ electron (a) and muon (b) channels and for the Z$\gamma \gamma $ electron (c) and muon (d) channels. In the ratio plot, the grey hashed area is the statistical error on the sum of signal and backgrounds while the uncertainty on the black dots is the statistical uncertainty of the data. The expected distribution for an example value of the anomalous coupling parameters $f_{M3}/\Lambda ^4$ and $f_{T0}/\Lambda ^4$ is also shown in blue.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Distribution of the transverse momentum of the diphoton system for the W$\gamma \gamma $ electron (a) and muon (b) channels and for the Z$\gamma \gamma $ electron (c) and muon (d) channels. In the ratio plot, the grey hashed area is the statistical error on the sum of signal and backgrounds while the uncertainty on the black dots is the statistical uncertainty of the data. The expected distribution for an example value of the anomalous coupling parameters $f_{M3}/\Lambda ^4$ and $f_{T0}/\Lambda ^4$ is also shown in blue.

png pdf
Figure 1-c:
Distribution of the transverse momentum of the diphoton system for the W$\gamma \gamma $ electron (a) and muon (b) channels and for the Z$\gamma \gamma $ electron (c) and muon (d) channels. In the ratio plot, the grey hashed area is the statistical error on the sum of signal and backgrounds while the uncertainty on the black dots is the statistical uncertainty of the data. The expected distribution for an example value of the anomalous coupling parameters $f_{M3}/\Lambda ^4$ and $f_{T0}/\Lambda ^4$ is also shown in blue.

png pdf
Figure 1-d:
Distribution of the transverse momentum of the diphoton system for the W$\gamma \gamma $ electron (a) and muon (b) channels and for the Z$\gamma \gamma $ electron (c) and muon (d) channels. In the ratio plot, the grey hashed area is the statistical error on the sum of signal and backgrounds while the uncertainty on the black dots is the statistical uncertainty of the data. The expected distribution for an example value of the anomalous coupling parameters $f_{M3}/\Lambda ^4$ and $f_{T0}/\Lambda ^4$ is also shown in blue.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Best fit values of the signal strengths for the W$\gamma \gamma $ (left) and the Z$\gamma \gamma $ (right) channels. The error bars represent the total uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
Best fit values of the signal strengths for the W$\gamma \gamma $ (left) and the Z$\gamma \gamma $ (right) channels. The error bars represent the total uncertainty.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
Best fit values of the signal strengths for the W$\gamma \gamma $ (left) and the Z$\gamma \gamma $ (right) channels. The error bars represent the total uncertainty.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of the systematic uncertainties (in%) for the W$\gamma \gamma $ and the Z$\gamma \gamma $ cross section measurements. The numbers indicate the impact of each systematic uncertainty on the value of the measured cross section in the corresponding channel.

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of the predicted and observed number of events with the full Run 2 statistics for the W$\gamma \gamma $ selection in the electron and muon channels. The systematic uncertainty on the predicted background and total background categories is obtained by summing the contributions of the different systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of the predicted and observed number of events with the full Run 2 statistics for the Z$\gamma \gamma $ selection in the electron and muon channels. The systematic uncertainty on the predicted background and total background categories is obtained by summing the contributions of the different systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Table 4:
Expected and observed limits for the different anomalous couplings parameters in both the W$\gamma \gamma $ and Z$\gamma \gamma $ channels.
Summary
The cross sections for both the W$\gamma\gamma$ and the Z$\gamma\gamma$ processes are measured in proton-proton collision events collected by the CMS experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$.

The cross sections are measured in a fiducial region where signal Monte Carlo events are selected at generator level in the W$\gamma\gamma$ channel by requiring exactly one electron (muon) with transverse momentum greater than 30 GeV and pseudorapidity smaller than 2.5 and at least two photons with transverse momentum greater than 20 GeV and pseudorapidity smaller than 2.5. Events are selected in the Z$\gamma\gamma$ channel by requiring two oppositely charged electrons (muons), at least one of them with transverse momentum greater than 30 GeV and pseudorapidity smaller than 2.5, and not less than two photons with transverse momentum greater than 20 GeV and pseudorapidity smaller than 2.5. Additionally the invariant mass of the dilepton system is required to be $m_{\ell\ell} > $ 55 GeV.

The measured cross sections are 13.63 $^{+1.93}_{-1.89}$ (stat.) $^{+4.04}_{-4.02} $(syst.) $\pm$ 0.08 (PDF+scale) fb for the W$\gamma\gamma$ channel and 5.41 $^{+0.58}_{-0.55}$ (stat.) $^{+0.64}_{-0.70}$ (syst.) $\pm$ 0.06 (PDF+scale) fb for the Z$\gamma\gamma$ channel. These results are in agreement with the theoretical cross sections computed at NLO. The corresponding significance for observing the signal is 3.1$\,\sigma$ and 4.8$\,\sigma$, respectively. Limits on anomalous Quartic Gauge Couplings are set using both channels.
References
1 C. Degrande et al. Effective Field Theory: A Modern Approach to Anomalous Couplings Annals Phys. 335 (2013) 21 1205.4231
2 ATLAS Collaboration Evidence of $ \mathrm{W}\gamma\gamma $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings with the ATLAS detector PRL 115 (2015) 031802 1503.03243
3 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of $ \mathrm{Z}\gamma $ and $ \mathrm{Z}\gamma\gamma $ production in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector PRD 93 (2016) 112002 1604.05232
4 CMS Collaboration Measurements of the pp $ \to\mathrm{W}\gamma\gamma $ and pp $ \to \mathrm{Z}\gamma\gamma $ cross sections and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV JHEP 10 (2017) 072 CMS-SMP-15-008
1704.00366
5 G. Bozzi, F. Campanario, M. Rauch, and D. Zeppenfeld $ \mathrm{W^{\pm}}\gamma\gamma $ production with leptonic decays at NLO QCD PRD 83 (2011) 114035 1103.4613
6 U. Baur, D. Wackeroth, and M. M. Weber Radiative corrections to $ \mathrm{W}\gamma\gamma $ production at the LHC PoS RADCOR2009 (2010) 067 1001.2688
7 G. Bozzi, F. Campanario, M. Rauch, and D. Zeppenfeld $ \mathrm{Z}\gamma\gamma $ production with leptonic decays and triple photon production at next-to-leading order QCD PRD 84 (2011) 074028 1107.3149
8 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
9 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
10 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 1405.0301
11 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions for the LHC Run II JHEP 04 (2015) 040 1410.8849
12 NNPDF Collaboration Parton distributions from high-precision collider data EPJC 77 (2017) 663 1706.00428
13 T. Gleisberg et al. SHERPA 1. alpha: A Proof of concept version JHEP 02 (2004) 056 hep-ph/0311263
14 T. Gleisberg et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 Journal of High Energy Physics 2 (2009) 007 0811.4622
15 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
16 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
17 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
18 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s- and t-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
19 P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer, and R. Rietkerk Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations JHEP 03 (2013) 015 1212.3460
20 T. Sjostrand et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
21 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
22 CMS Collaboration Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements EPJC 80 (2020) 4 CMS-GEN-17-001
1903.12179
23 C. Degrande et al. UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output CPC 183 (2012) 1201 1108.2040
24 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4 - a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
25 CMS Collaboration Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector JINST 12 (2017) P10003 CMS-PRF-14-001
1706.04965
26 CMS Collaboration Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV using the CMS detector JINST 14 (2019) P07004 CMS-JME-17-001
1903.06078
27 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inclusive $ \mathrm{W} $ and $ \mathrm{Z} $ production cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV with the CMS experiment JHEP 10 (2011) 132 CMS-EWK-10-005
1107.4789
28 O. J. P. Éboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and J. K. Mizukoshi $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}}\to\mathrm{jj}\mathrm{e^{\pm}}\mu^{\pm}\nu\nu $ and $ \mathrm{jj}\mathrm{e^{\pm}}\mu^{\mp}\nu\nu $ at $ \mathcal{O}(\alpha_\mathrm{em}^6) $ and $ \mathcal{O}(\alpha_\mathrm{em}^4\alpha_\mathrm{s}^2) $ for the study of the quartic electroweak gauge boson vertex at CERN LHC PRD 74 (2006) 073005 hep-ph/0606118
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN