CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-SMP-14-023
Differential cross section measurements of W bosons produced in association with jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= $ 8 TeV
Abstract: Measurements of the differential cross-sections for a $\mathrm{W}(\rightarrow \mu\nu)$ boson produced in association with jets are presented here. The measurements use a data sample of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV that was recorded by the CMS detector at the LHC, and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 19.6 fb$^{-1}$. The cross sections are reported as a function of jet multiplicity, the jet transverse momenta, and the scalar sum of jet transverse momenta ($H_\mathrm{T}$) for different jet multiplicities. Several angular correlation distributions among the jets and the muon are also examined, as well as the distributions of the average number of jets as a function of $H_\mathrm{T}$ and as a function of angular variables. Such angular distributions are sensitive to the modeling of higher order corrections, and to the modeling of parton emissions. The cross section measurements are then compared with the predictions from leading-order and multileg next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo generators, fixed order next-to-leading-order theoretical predictions for up to four jets as well as next-to-next-to-leading-order predictions of W+1 jet.
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
Reconstructed data and simulated signal and backgrounds for inclusive jet multiplicity (a) and the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ of the leading jet (b) in $\mathrm{ W } + \geq 1$ jet events.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
Reconstructed data and simulated signal and backgrounds for inclusive jet multiplicity (a) and the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ of the leading jet (b) in $\mathrm{ W } + \geq 1$ jet events.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Systematic uncertainties on measured cross section as a function of jet multiplicity. Shown in the figure are uncertainties due to jet energy scale (JES), background normalisation (BG), the b-tagging efficiency (BtagSF), the finite number of simulated events used to construct the response matrix (MC), and other systematic uncertainties mentioned in Section {systematics}.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The cross section measurement for the exclusive and inclusive jet multiplicities, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The cross section measurement for the exclusive and inclusive jet multiplicities, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
The differential cross section measurement for the leading four jets' transverse momenta, compared to the prediction of MadGraph, MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and the NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
The differential cross section measurement for the leading four jets' transverse momenta, compared to the prediction of MadGraph, MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and the NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
The differential cross section measurement for the leading four jets' transverse momenta, compared to the prediction of MadGraph, MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and the NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 4-d:
The differential cross section measurement for the leading four jets' transverse momenta, compared to the prediction of MadGraph, MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and the NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The differential cross section measurement for $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 1-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The differential cross section measurement for $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 1-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
The differential cross section measurement for $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 1-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
The differential cross section measurement for $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 1-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
The differential cross section measurement for the dijet $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
The differential cross section measurement for the dijet $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 6-c:
The differential cross section measurement for the dijet $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 7-a:
The differential cross section measurement for the dijet invariant mass for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 7-b:
The differential cross section measurement for the dijet invariant mass for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 7-c:
The differential cross section measurement for the dijet invariant mass for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 8-a:
The differential cross section measurement for the leading four jets' pseudorapidity, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and the NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 8-b:
The differential cross section measurement for the leading four jets' pseudorapidity, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and the NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 8-c:
The differential cross section measurement for the leading four jets' pseudorapidity, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and the NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 8-d:
The differential cross section measurement for the leading four jets' pseudorapidity, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, BLACKHAT+SHERPA , and NNLO inclusive 1 jet production (indicated as NNLO1j). BLACKHAT+SHERPA and NNLO1j are corrected for hadronisation and multiple-parton interactions effects. Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA and the NNLO1j uncertainties also contain theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 9-a:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta y(j_1,j_2)$ for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 9-b:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta y(j_1,j_2)$ for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 9-c:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta y(j_1,j_2)$ for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 10-a:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta y(j_1,j_3)$ and $\Delta y(j_2,j_3)$ for an inclusive jet multiplicity of 3, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 10-b:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta y(j_1,j_3)$ and $\Delta y(j_2,j_3)$ for an inclusive jet multiplicity of 3, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 11-a:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta y(j_F,j_B)$ for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 11-b:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta y(j_F,j_B)$ for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 11-c:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta y(j_F,j_B)$ for inclusive jet multiplicities 2-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 12-a:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta \phi (j_1,j_2)$ and $\Delta \phi (j_F,j_B)$ for inclusive jet multiplicity of 2, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 12-b:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta \phi (j_1,j_2)$ and $\Delta \phi (j_F,j_B)$ for inclusive jet multiplicity of 2, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 13:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta R(j_{1},j_{2})$ for an inclusive jet multiplicity of 2, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 14-a:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta \phi (j_{n},\mu )$ for inclusive jet multiplicities of n = 1-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph ,MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 14-b:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta \phi (j_{n},\mu )$ for inclusive jet multiplicities of n = 1-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph ,MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 14-c:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta \phi (j_{n},\mu )$ for inclusive jet multiplicities of n = 1-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph ,MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 14-d:
The differential cross section measurement for $\Delta \phi (j_{n},\mu )$ for inclusive jet multiplicities of n = 1-4, compared to the prediction of MadGraph ,MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 15-a:
The measurement of the mean number of jets as a function of $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 1-2, and as a function of $\Delta y(j_1,j_2)$, and of $\Delta y(j_F,j_B)$ for an inclusive jet multiplicity of 2, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 15-b:
The measurement of the mean number of jets as a function of $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 1-2, and as a function of $\Delta y(j_1,j_2)$, and of $\Delta y(j_F,j_B)$ for an inclusive jet multiplicity of 2, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 15-c:
The measurement of the mean number of jets as a function of $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 1-2, and as a function of $\Delta y(j_1,j_2)$, and of $\Delta y(j_F,j_B)$ for an inclusive jet multiplicity of 2, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.

png pdf
Figure 15-d:
The measurement of the mean number of jets as a function of $ {H_{\mathrm {T}}} $ for inclusive jet multiplicities 1-2, and as a function of $\Delta y(j_1,j_2)$, and of $\Delta y(j_F,j_B)$ for an inclusive jet multiplicity of 2, compared to the prediction of MadGraph , SHERPA-2, and BLACKHAT+SHERPA (corrected for hadronization and multiple-parton interactions). Black circular markers with the grey hatched band represent the unfolded data measurement and its uncertainty. Overlaid are the predictions together with their statistical uncertainties (Theory stat.). The BLACKHAT+SHERPA uncertainty also contains theoretical systematic uncertainties (Theory syst.) described in Section 9. The lower plots show the ratio of each prediction to the unfolded data.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Number of events in data and simulation as a function of exclusive jet multiplicity.
Summary
Measurements of the cross sections and differential cross sections for a $\mathrm{ W }$ boson produced in association with jets in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV were presented. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 19.6 fb$^{-1}$ and were collected with the CMS detector during the 2012 proton-proton run of the LHC.

Cross sections determined using the muon decay mode of the W boson were presented as functions of the jet multiplicity, the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and pseudorapidities of the four leading jets, the $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ for jet multiplicities up to four, and the dijet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ and invariant mass. Cross sections were also presented as a function of several angular correlation variables: rapidity separation, azimuthal angle separation and $\Delta R$ separation among $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-ordered and rapidity-ordered jets, and azimuthal angle separation between the muon and the leading jet. The distribution of the mean number of jets as a function of $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ and rapidity differences among jets were examined.

The results were corrected for all detector effects by means of regularised unfolding and compared with particle-level simulated predictions at LO (MADGRAPH+PYTHIA), NLO (SHERPA-2, MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO, and BLACKHAT+ sherpa) and NNLO.

The predictions generally describe the jet multiplicity within the uncertainties, with increasing deviations observed in SHERPA-2 for jet multiplicities beyond four, where four corresponds to the number of partons included at CMS in the matrix element calculation for those generators. The cross sections as a function of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the leading, second-, and third-leading jets are overestimated by MADGRAPH+PYTHIA in a region of intermediate $p_{\mathrm{T}}$, and by SHERPA-2 at low-$p_{\mathrm{T}}$. The cross sections as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ predicted by BLACKHAT+ sherpa agree with the measurements within uncertainties. The predictions from MadGraph5$\_$aMC@NLO are very similar to the predictions of MADGRAPH+PYTHIA for most distributions.

The predictions from BLACKHAT+ sherpa underestimate the measurement of the cross section as a function of $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ for $N_\text{jet} \geq 1$, since the contribution from $\mathrm{ W }$+$\geq$3 jets is missing from an NLO prediction of $\mathrm{ W }$+$\geq$1 jet. The cross sections as a function of $H_{\mathrm{T}}$ predicted by SHERPA-2 overestimate the measurement of the cross section, particularly at high $H_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The jet $\abs{\eta}$ distribution shows some deviations for large values of $\abs{\eta}$ and the angular correlation distributions in rapidity difference show deviations for large opening angles. The distribution of the azimuthal angle between the muon and the leading jet is not well modelled by BLACKHAT+ sherpa for jet multiplicity of 1. The correlation distributions in azimuthal angle among jets agree with data, as do the mean number of jets distributions, both as a function of angular correlation variables and of $H_{\mathrm{T}}$.

The NNLO predictions of $\mathrm{ W }$+1 jet were compared with the results of the leading jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$, $H_{\mathrm{T}}$, and $\abs{\eta}$. They agree within uncertainties.
References
1 J. Alwall et al. MadGraph 5: going beyond JHEP 06 (2011) 128 1106.0522
2 T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual JHEP 05 (2006) 026 hep-ph/0603175
3 S. H\"oche, F. Krauss, M. Sch\"onherr, and F. Siegert QCD matrix elements + parton showers: The NLO case JHEP 1304 (2013) 027 1207.5030
4 Z. Bern et al. Ntuples for NLO events at hadron colliders CPC 185 (2014) 1443 1310.7439
5 R. Boughezal, C. Focke, X. Liu, and F. Petriello $ W $-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD PRL 115 (2015) 062002 1504.02131
6 CDF Collaboration Measurement of the cross section for W-boson production in association with jets in p$ \overline{\text{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 1.96 $ TeV PRD 77 (2008) 011108 0711.4044
7 D0 Collaboration Measurements of inclusive $ \mathrm{ W } $+jets production rates as a function of jet transverse momentum in p$ \overline{\text{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 1.96 $~TeV PLB 705 (2011) 200 1106.1457
8 D0 Collaboration Studies of $ \mathrm{ W } $ boson plus jets production in p$ \overline{\text{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 1.96 $~TeV PRD 88 (2013) 092001 1302.6508
9 ATLAS Collaboration Measurements of the W production cross sections in association with jets with the ATLAS detector EPJC 75 (2015) 82 1409.8639
10 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the Differential Cross Section of W-Bosons Produced in Association with Jets in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 7 TeV PLB 741 (2015) 12 CMS-SMP-12-023
1406.7533
11 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
12 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4---a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
13 J. Pumplin et al. New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis JHEP 07 (2002) 012 hep-ph/0201195
14 K. Melnikov and F. Petriello Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through O($ \alpha_{S}^2) $ PRD 74 (2006) 114017 hep-ph/0609070
15 J. Alwall et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions EPJC 53 (2008) 473 0706.2569
16 P. Nason A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms JHEP 11 (2004) 040 hep-ph/0409146
17 S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method JHEP 11 (2007) 070 0709.2092
18 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX JHEP 06 (2010) 043 1002.2581
19 S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: $ s $- and $ t $-channel contributions JHEP 09 (2009) 111 0907.4076
20 CMS Collaboration Charged particle multiplicities in pp interactions at $ \sqrt{s} = 0.9 $, 2.36, and 7\TeV JHEP 01 (2010) 079 CMS-QCD-10-004
1011.5531
21 J. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and F. Tramontano Single top-quark production and decay at next-to-leading order PRD 70 (2004) 094012 hep-ph/0408158
22 J. Campbell and F. Tramontano Next-to-leading order corrections to Wt production and decay Nucl. Phys. B 726 (2005) 109 hep-ph/0506289
23 J. M. Campbell, R. Frederix, F. Maltoni, and F. Tramontano Next-to-Leading-Order Predictions for $ t $-Channel Single-Top Production at Hadron Colliders PRL 102 (2009) 182003 0903.0005
24 J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams Vector boson pair production at the LHC JHEP 07 (2011) 018 1105.0020
25 M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov The total top quark pair production cross-section at hadron colliders through O($ \alpha_S^4 $) PRL 110 (2013) 252004 1303.6254
26 CMS Collaboration Particle--Flow Event Reconstruction in CMS and Performance for Jets, Taus, and \MET CDS
27 CMS Collaboration Commissioning of the Particle-flow Event Reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector CDS
28 CMS Collaboration Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s} = 7 $\TeV JINST 7 (2012) P10002 CMS-MUO-10-004
1206.4071
29 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm JHEP 04 (2008) 063 0802.1189
30 M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez FastJet user manual EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 1111.6097
31 CMS Collaboration Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS JINST 6 (2011) 11002 CMS-JME-10-011
1107.4277
32 CMS Collaboration Identification of b-quark jets with the CMS experiment JINST 8 (2013) 04013 CMS-BTV-12-001
1211.4462
33 G. D'Agostini A multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes theorem Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 362 (1995) 487
34 T. Adye Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold 1105.1160
35 J. Campbell and R. Ellis Next-to-leading order corrections to W+2 jet and Z+2 jet production at hadron colliders link
36 CMS Collaboration Absolute Calibration of the Luminosity Measurement at CMS: Winter 2012 Update CDS
37 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PLB 722 (2013) 5 CMS-FWD-11-001
1210.6718
38 C. F. Berger et al. Next-to-leading order QCD predictions for W+3-Jet distributions at hadron colliders PRD 80 (2009) 074036 0907.1984
39 J. Alwall et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations JHEP 07 (2014) 079 arXiv:1405.0301
40 M. Ubiali Towards the NNPDF3.0 parton set for the second LHC run PoS DIS2014 07 (2014) 041 arXiv:1407.3122
41 T. Gleisberg et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 JHEP 02 (2009) 007 0811.4622
42 C. Berger et al. One-Loop Calculations with BlackHat Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl. 183 (2008) 313--319 0807.3705
43 C. Berger et al. Vector Boson + Jets with BlackHat and Sherpa Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl. 205-206 (2010) 92--97 1005.3728
44 S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, M. Schonherr, and F. Siegert A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods JHEP 09 (2012) 049 1111.1220
45 A. Buckley et al. Rivet user manual CPC 184 (2013) 2803 1003.0694
46 S. Alekhin et al. The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Report 1101.0536
47 M. Botje et al. The PDF4LHC Working Group Interim Recommendations 1101.0538
48 D. Ma\^itre and S. Sapeta Simulated NNLO for high-$ p_\text{T} $ observables in vector boson + jets production at the LHC EPJC 73 (2013) 2663 1307.2252
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN