CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-PAS-HIN-21-006
Two-particle femtoscopic correlation measurements of $\mathrm{K^{0}_{S}}$ and $\Lambda (\overline{\Lambda})$ particles in PbPb collisions at ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}= $ 5.02 TeV
Abstract: Two-particle correlations as a function of relative momentum are presented for $\mathrm{K^{0}_{S}}$, $\Lambda$, and $\overline{\Lambda}$ strange hadrons produced in lead-lead collisions at ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}= $ 5.02 TeV. The data were obtained using the CMS detector at the LHC. Such correlations are sensitive to quantum statistics and to possible final-state interactions between the particles. Source radii extracted from $\mathrm{K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}}$ correlations in different centrality regions are found to decrease in going from central to peripheral collisions. Strong-interaction scattering parameters (i.e., scattering length and effective range) are determined from $\Lambda\mathrm{K^{0}_{S}}\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\mathrm{K^{0}_{S}}$ and $\Lambda\Lambda\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\overline{\Lambda}$ correlations using the Lednicky-Lyuboshits model and compared to other experimental and theoretical results.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
The invariant mass of ${\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ (left) and $\Lambda{+}\overline {\Lambda}$ (right), and their corresponding fits in the 0-80% centrality range. The circles are the data, and the fit is shown with a solid curve for the total fit, a dashed-dotted curve for the signal component, and a dashed curve for the background component. The vertical lines indicate the $ \pm $2$ \sigma $ peak region.

png pdf
Figure 1-a:
The invariant mass of ${\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ (left) and $\Lambda{+}\overline {\Lambda}$ (right), and their corresponding fits in the 0-80% centrality range. The circles are the data, and the fit is shown with a solid curve for the total fit, a dashed-dotted curve for the signal component, and a dashed curve for the background component. The vertical lines indicate the $ \pm $2$ \sigma $ peak region.

png pdf
Figure 1-b:
The invariant mass of ${\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ (left) and $\Lambda{+}\overline {\Lambda}$ (right), and their corresponding fits in the 0-80% centrality range. The circles are the data, and the fit is shown with a solid curve for the total fit, a dashed-dotted curve for the signal component, and a dashed curve for the background component. The vertical lines indicate the $ \pm $2$ \sigma $ peak region.

png pdf
Figure 2:
The correlation distributions and fits for the ${\mathrm {K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}}}$ pair for the 20-30% centrality range (left), and the ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ (right) and ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ (bottom) pairs with 0-80% centrality. In these plots, red circles are the experimental results, the blue solid line is the fit using Eq. (7), and the green dotted line is the nonfemtoscopic background from Eq. (6).

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The correlation distributions and fits for the ${\mathrm {K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}}}$ pair for the 20-30% centrality range (left), and the ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ (right) and ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ (bottom) pairs with 0-80% centrality. In these plots, red circles are the experimental results, the blue solid line is the fit using Eq. (7), and the green dotted line is the nonfemtoscopic background from Eq. (6).

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The correlation distributions and fits for the ${\mathrm {K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}}}$ pair for the 20-30% centrality range (left), and the ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ (right) and ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ (bottom) pairs with 0-80% centrality. In these plots, red circles are the experimental results, the blue solid line is the fit using Eq. (7), and the green dotted line is the nonfemtoscopic background from Eq. (6).

png pdf
Figure 2-c:
The correlation distributions and fits for the ${\mathrm {K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}}}$ pair for the 20-30% centrality range (left), and the ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ (right) and ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ (bottom) pairs with 0-80% centrality. In these plots, red circles are the experimental results, the blue solid line is the fit using Eq. (7), and the green dotted line is the nonfemtoscopic background from Eq. (6).

png pdf
Figure 3:
Left: $R_{\text {inv}}$ as a function of centrality by considering only the QS (blue circle), and both the QS and FSI effects (red circles). Right: $R_{\text {inv}}$ as a function of $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ (dark markers) and compared with ALICE data (light markers) for PbPb collisions at ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 2.76 TeV [27] in 0-10, 10-30, and 30-50% centrality classes. For each data point, the line and shaded area indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainty, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
Left: $R_{\text {inv}}$ as a function of centrality by considering only the QS (blue circle), and both the QS and FSI effects (red circles). Right: $R_{\text {inv}}$ as a function of $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ (dark markers) and compared with ALICE data (light markers) for PbPb collisions at ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 2.76 TeV [27] in 0-10, 10-30, and 30-50% centrality classes. For each data point, the line and shaded area indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainty, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
Left: $R_{\text {inv}}$ as a function of centrality by considering only the QS (blue circle), and both the QS and FSI effects (red circles). Right: $R_{\text {inv}}$ as a function of $m_{\mathrm {T}}$ (dark markers) and compared with ALICE data (light markers) for PbPb collisions at ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 2.76 TeV [27] in 0-10, 10-30, and 30-50% centrality classes. For each data point, the line and shaded area indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainty, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 4:
The $\lambda $ parameter as a function of centrality by considering only the QS (blue circles) and both the QS and FSI effects (red circles). For each data point, the line and shaded area indicate the statistical and systematic uncertainty, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 5:
The values of $d_{0}$ and $\Re f_{0}$ (left) and the values of $\Im f_{0}$ and $\Re f_{0}$ (right). In the left plot, the blue triangles and square markers are for ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ and ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ correlations, respectively, and are compared with the ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ result from the STAR experiment [28] and ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ results from ALICE experiment [27]. A reanalysis of STAR data for ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ correlations is shown in the shaded area [32]. Theory calculations of the ${\Lambda \Lambda}$ interaction parameters are shown as black triangles [33,34]. The blue dotted lines correspond to the relation $d_{0} = {|\Re {f_{0}}|}/{2}$. In the right plot, the triangle is for ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ correlations, and is compared with the ALICE ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ result [27]. For each data point, the two lines and the box indicate the (one-dimensional) statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
The values of $d_{0}$ and $\Re f_{0}$ (left) and the values of $\Im f_{0}$ and $\Re f_{0}$ (right). In the left plot, the blue triangles and square markers are for ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ and ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ correlations, respectively, and are compared with the ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ result from the STAR experiment [28] and ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ results from ALICE experiment [27]. A reanalysis of STAR data for ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ correlations is shown in the shaded area [32]. Theory calculations of the ${\Lambda \Lambda}$ interaction parameters are shown as black triangles [33,34]. The blue dotted lines correspond to the relation $d_{0} = {|\Re {f_{0}}|}/{2}$. In the right plot, the triangle is for ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ correlations, and is compared with the ALICE ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ result [27]. For each data point, the two lines and the box indicate the (one-dimensional) statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
The values of $d_{0}$ and $\Re f_{0}$ (left) and the values of $\Im f_{0}$ and $\Re f_{0}$ (right). In the left plot, the blue triangles and square markers are for ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ and ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ correlations, respectively, and are compared with the ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ result from the STAR experiment [28] and ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ results from ALICE experiment [27]. A reanalysis of STAR data for ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ correlations is shown in the shaded area [32]. Theory calculations of the ${\Lambda \Lambda}$ interaction parameters are shown as black triangles [33,34]. The blue dotted lines correspond to the relation $d_{0} = {|\Re {f_{0}}|}/{2}$. In the right plot, the triangle is for ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ correlations, and is compared with the ALICE ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ result [27]. For each data point, the two lines and the box indicate the (one-dimensional) statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
Summary of systematic uncertainties in ${\mathrm {K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}}}$ correlations in different centrality bins

png pdf
Table 2:
Summary of systematic uncertainties in ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ correlations in 0-80% centrality

png pdf
Table 3:
Summary of systematic uncertainties in ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ correlations in 0-80% centrality

png pdf
Table 4:
Extracted values of the $R_{inv}$, $\Re f_{0}$, $\Im f_{0}$, $d_{0}$, and $\lambda $ from ${\Lambda \mathrm {K^0_S}\oplus \overline {\Lambda}\mathrm {K^0_S}}$ and ${\Lambda \Lambda \oplus \overline {\Lambda}\overline {\Lambda}}$ correlations in the 0-80% centrality.
Summary
The ${\mathrm{K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}}}$, ${\Lambda\mathrm{K^0_S}\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\mathrm{K^0_S}}$, and ${\Lambda\mathrm{K^0_S}\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\mathrm{K^0_S}}$ femtoscopic correlations are extracted from data collected in PbPb collisions at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV. This is the first report of ${\Lambda\mathrm{K^0_S}\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\mathrm{K^0_S}}$ correlations in PbPb collisions. The source size $R_{\text{inv}}$ is extracted for ${\mathrm{K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}}}$ correlations in six equal width centrality bins covering the 0-60% centrality range and is found to decrease going towards more peripheral collisions. The extraction of $R_{\text{inv}}$ as a function of $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ is also presented for ${\mathrm{K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}}}$ correlations and is compared with ALICE results at ${\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 2.76 TeV. Measured values for $R_{\text{inv}}$, based on ${\Lambda\mathrm{K^0_S}\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\mathrm{K^0_S}}$, and ${\Lambda\mathrm{K^0_S}\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\mathrm{K^0_S}}$ correlations, are also presented for the 0-80% centrality range. The Lednicky-Lyuboshits model fits to the correlation data indicate that the ${\Lambda\mathrm{K^0_S}\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\mathrm{K^0_S}}$ interaction is repulsive and ${\Lambda\mathrm{K^0_S}\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\mathrm{K^0_S}}$ interaction is attractive with no evidence for a bound H-dibaryon.
References
1 M. A. Lisa, S. Pratt, R. Soltz, and U. Wiedemann Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy ion collisions Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55 (2005) 357 nucl-ex/0505014
2 R. Lednicky and V. L. Lyuboshits Final State Interaction Effect on Pairing Correlations Between Particles with Small Relative Momenta Sov. J. NP 35 (1982) 770
3 Tracker Group of the CMS Collaboration The CMS phase-1 pixel detector upgrade JINST 16 (2021) P02027 2012.14304
4 CMS Collaboration Track impact parameter resolution for the full pseudo rapidity coverage in the 2017 dataset with the CMS phase-1 pixel detector CDS
5 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
6 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) 01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
7 CMS Collaboration Charged-particle nuclear modification factors in PbPb and pPb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 5.02 TeV JHEP 04 (2017) 039 CMS-HIN-15-015
1611.01664
8 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
9 CMS Collaboration Observation and studies of jet quenching in PbPb collisions at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy = 2.76 TeV PRC 84 (2011) CMS-HIN-10-004
1102.1957
10 C. Gale, S. Jeon, and B. Schenke Hydrodynamic modeling of heavy ion collisions Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1340011 1301.5893
11 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
12 CMS Collaboration Strange particle collectivity in pPb and PbPb CMS-PAS-HIN-19-004 CMS-PAS-HIN-19-004
13 CMS Collaboration Strange Particle Production in pp Collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 0.9 and 7 TeV JHEP 05 (2011) 064 CMS-QCD-10-007
1102.4282
14 CMS Collaboration Long-range two-particle correlations of strange hadrons with charged particles in pPb and PbPb collisions at LHC energies PLB 742 (2015) 200 CMS-HIN-14-002
1409.3392
15 Particle Data Group Collaboration Review of Particle Physics PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01
16 H. Voss, A. Hocker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt TMVA, the toolkit for multivariate data analysis with ROOT in XIth International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACAT), 2007 physics/0703039
17 G. I. Kopylov Like particle correlations as a tool to study the multiple production mechanism Physics Letters B 50 (1974) 472
18 A. Kisiel Non-identical Particle Correlation Analysis in the Presence of Non-femtoscopic Correlations Acta Phys. Polon. B 48 (2017) 717
19 CMS Collaboration Bose-Einstein correlations in pp, pPb, and PbPb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 0.9 - 7 TeV PRC 97 (2018) 064912 CMS-FSQ-14-002
1712.07198
20 ALICE Collaboration p-p, p-${\Lambda} $, and $ {\Lambda} $-$ {\Lambda} $ correlations studied via femtoscopy in pp reactions at $ \sqrt{s}=$ 7 TeV PRC 99 (2019) 024001 1805.12455
21 CMS Collaboration Measurement of two-particle Bose-Einstein momentum correlations and their Levy parameters at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}}= $ 5.02 TeV PbPb collisions CMS-PAS-HIN-21-011 CMS-PAS-HIN-21-011
22 STAR Collaboration Neutral kaon interferometry in Au-Au collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 200 GeV PRC 74 (2006) 054902 nucl-ex/0608012
23 A. D. Martin and E. N. Ozmutlu Analyses of KK production and scalar mesons NPB 158 (1979) 520
24 A. Antonelli Radiative $ \phi $ decays eConfC 020620 (2002) THAT06 hep-ex/0209069
25 N. N. Achasov and V. V. Gubin Analysis of the nature of the $ \phi \rightarrow \gamma \pi \eta $ and $ \phi \rightarrow \gamma \pi^{0} \pi^{0} $ decays Phys. Atom. Nucl. 65 (2002) 1528 hep-ph/0101024
26 N. N. Achasov and A. V. Kiselev New analysis of the KLOE data on the $ {\varphi \rightarrow} {\eta} {{\pi}}^{0} {\gamma} $ decay PRD 68 (2003) 014006 hep-ph/0212153
27 ALICE Collaboration $ \Lambda $K femtoscopy in Pb-Pb collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 2.76 TeV PRC 103 (2021) 055201 2005.11124
28 STAR Collaboration $ {\Lambda} {\Lambda} $ Correlation Function in Au+Au collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 200 GeV PRL 114 (2015) 022301 1408.4360
29 ALICE Collaboration Measurement of strange baryon-antibaryon interactions with femtoscopic correlations Physics Letters B 802 (2020) 135223 1903.06149
30 STAR Collaboration Proton-$ \Lambda $ correlations in central Au+Au collisions at $ {\sqrt {\smash [b]{s_{_{\mathrm {NN}}}}}} = $ 200 GeV PRC 74 (2006) 064906 nucl-ex/0511003
31 F. James and M. Roos Minuit: A System for Function Minimization and Analysis of the Parameter Errors and Correlations CPC 10 (1975) 343
32 K. Morita, T. Furumoto, and A. Ohnishi $ {\Lambda} {\Lambda} $ interaction from relativistic heavy ion collisions PRC 91 (2015) 024916 1408.6682
33 E. Hiyama et al. Four-body cluster structure of $ \mathrm{A} = $ 7-10 double-$ {\Lambda} $ hypernuclei PRC 66 (2002) 024007 nucl-th/0204059
34 I. N. Filikhin and A. Gal Faddeev-Yakubovsky calculations for light $ {\Lambda} {\Lambda} $ hypernuclei NP A 707 (2002) 491 nucl-th/0203036
35 H. Takahashi et al. Observation of a $ {{\Lambda} {\Lambda}}^{6} \text{He}$ Double Hypernucleus PRL 87 (2001) 212502
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN