CMS logoCMS event Hgg
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN

CMS-FSQ-16-006 ; CERN-EP-2020-005
Study of central exclusive $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 5.02 and 13 TeV
Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 718
Abstract: Central exclusive production of $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ pairs is measured with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at the LHC at center-of-mass energies of 5.02 and 13 TeV. The theoretical description of these nonperturbative processes, which have not yet been measured in detail at the LHC, poses a significant challenge to models. The two pions are measured and identified in the CMS silicon tracker based on specific energy loss, whereas the absence of other particles is ensured by calorimeter information. The total and differential cross sections of exclusive central $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ production are measured as functions of invariant mass, transverse momentum, and rapidity of the $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ system in the fiducial region defined as transverse momentum ${p_{\mathrm{T}}}(\pi) > $ 0.2 GeV and pseudorapidity $|{\eta(\pi)}| < $ 2.4. The production cross sections for the four resonant channels $\mathrm{f}_{0}(500)$, $\rho^{0}(770)$, $\mathrm{f}_{0}(980)$, and $\mathrm{f}_{2}(1270)$ are extracted using a simple model. These results represent the first measurement of this process at the LHC collision energies of 5.02 and 13 TeV.
Figures & Tables Summary References CMS Publications
Figures

png pdf
Figure 1:
Diagrams of the dominant mechanisms for $\pi^{+} \pi^{-} $ production via CEP in proton-proton collisions: (a) continuum; (b) resonant double pomeron exchange; and (c) vector meson photoproduction.

png pdf
Figure 2:
Left: The distribution of the logarithm of the mean energy loss and absolute value of the momentum of tracks from low-multiplicity ($N_\text {track} \leq $ 4) events collected at $\sqrt {s} = $ 13 TeV. The $\pi $-selection region is shown in the 0.3-10 GeV range. All tracks outside this momentum range are identified as pions. Right: The fit energy loss distributions in a given momentum bin with the sum of three Gaussian curves. Plots are similar for the 5.02 TeV data.

png pdf
Figure 2-a:
The distribution of the logarithm of the mean energy loss and absolute value of the momentum of tracks from low-multiplicity ($N_\text {track} \leq $ 4) events collected at $\sqrt {s} = $ 13 TeV. The $\pi $-selection region is shown in the 0.3-10 GeV range. All tracks outside this momentum range are identified as pions.

png pdf
Figure 2-b:
The fit energy loss distributions in a given momentum bin with the sum of three Gaussian curves.

png pdf
Figure 3:
The number of extra calorimeter towers over threshold in events containing an identified pion pair with opposite (left) and same (right) charge. The known contributions, denoted with the red hatched areas, are used to estimate the background in the zero bin of the opposite-sign distribution, which is denoted by the blue hatched area. The error bars correspond to statistical uncertainties, whereas the error rectangle on the background denotes the 14% systematic uncertainty in the background normalization. Plots are similar for 5.02 TeV data.

png pdf
Figure 3-a:
The number of extra calorimeter towers over threshold in events containing an identified pion pair with opposite charge. The error bars correspond to statistical uncertainties, whereas the error rectangle on the background denotes the 14% systematic uncertainty in the background normalization.

png pdf
Figure 3-b:
The number of extra calorimeter towers over threshold in events containing an identified pion pair with same charge. The error bars correspond to statistical uncertainties, whereas the error rectangle on the background denotes the 14% systematic uncertainty in the background normalization.

png pdf
Figure 4:
Background distributions as functions of kinematic variables estimated by data-driven methods. The proton dissociation background is not shown here, since it is included via scaling of the final cross section values. The error bars correspond to statistical uncertainties. The results for the 5.02 TeV data set are similar.

png pdf
Figure 4-a:
Background distribution as a function of $m(\pi^{+}\pi^{-})$ estimated by data-driven methods. The proton dissociation background is not shown here, since it is included via scaling of the final cross section values. The error bars correspond to statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4-b:
Background distribution as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\pi^{+}\pi^{-})$ estimated by data-driven methods. The proton dissociation background is not shown here, since it is included via scaling of the final cross section values. The error bars correspond to statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 4-c:
Background distribution as a function of $y(\pi^{+}\pi^{-})$ estimated by data-driven methods. The proton dissociation background is not shown here, since it is included via scaling of the final cross section values. The error bars correspond to statistical uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5:
Differential cross sections as functions of mass (upper row), transverse momentum (middle row), and rapidity (bottom row), compared with generator-level simulations for the 5.02 (left) and 13 TeV (right) data sets. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes to systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-a:
Differential cross sections as functions of mass, compared with generator-level simulations for the 5.02 TeV data sets. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes to systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-b:
Differential cross sections as functions of mass, compared with generator-level simulations for the 13 TeV data sets. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes to systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-c:
Differential cross sections as functions of transverse momentum, compared with generator-level simulations for the 5.02 TeV data sets. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes to systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-d:
Differential cross sections as functions of transverse momentum, compared with generator-level simulations for the 13 TeV data sets. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes to systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-e:
Differential cross sections as functions of rapidity, compared with generator-level simulations for the 5.02 TeV data sets. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes to systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 5-f:
Differential cross sections as functions of rapidity, compared with generator-level simulations for the 13 TeV data sets. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes to systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6:
Fit to the measured cross section with the sum of four interfering relativistic Breit-Wigner functions convolved with a normal distribution (to account for the the experimental resolution of the detector) for the 5.02 (left) and 13 TeV (right) data sets. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes correspond to systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-a:
Fit to the measured cross section with the sum of four interfering relativistic Breit-Wigner functions convolved with a normal distribution (to account for the the experimental resolution of the detector) for the 5.02 TeV data set. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes correspond to systematic uncertainties.

png pdf
Figure 6-b:
Fit to the measured cross section with the sum of four interfering relativistic Breit-Wigner functions convolved with a normal distribution (to account for the the experimental resolution of the detector) for the 13 TeV data set. The error bars correspond to statistical, whereas the open boxes correspond to systematic uncertainties.
Tables

png pdf
Table 1:
The value of calorimeter thresholds for different calorimeter constituents, used in the selection of exclusive events.

png pdf
Table 2:
Correction factors.

png pdf
Table 3:
Checking the validity of Eq. (9) by comparing the true and predicted number of background events in inclusive MC samples.

png pdf
Table 4:
The semiexclusive/exclusive ratio $R$ calculated from different MC event generators. The average $R$ value is also shown together with its systematic uncertainty.

png pdf
Table 5:
The sources and average values of systematic uncertainties, used as the systematic uncertainty of the total cross section.

png pdf
Table 6:
Cross sections of the resonant processes in the $ {p_{\mathrm {T}}} (\pi) > $ 0.2 GeV, $ {| \eta (\pi) |} < $ 2.4 fiducial region, extracted from the simple model fit using the sum of the continuum distribution obtained from the DIME MC model and four dominant resonances. The STARLIGHT predictions for ${\mathrm{p}} {\mathrm{p}} \to {\mathrm{p}} '{\mathrm{p}} '\rho^{0} \to {\mathrm{p}} '{\mathrm{p}} ' \pi^{+} \pi^{-} $ processes are 2.3 and 3.0 $\mu$b for 5.02 and 13 TeV, respectively, which is compatible with the fit results.
Summary
The cross sections for central exclusive pion pair production have been measured in ${\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}}$ collisions at 5.02 and 13 TeV center-of-mass energies. Exclusive events are selected by vetoing additional energy deposits in the calorimeters and by requiring two oppositely charged pions identified via their mean energy loss in the tracker detectors. These events are used together with correction factors to obtain invariant mass, transverse momentum, and rapidity distributions of the $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ system. Four resonant peaks can be identified in the mass spectrum: $\mathrm{f}_{0}(500)$, $\rho^{0}(770)$, $\mathrm{f}_{0}(980)$, and $\mathrm{f}_{2}(1270)$, which are fitted with a simple model containing four interfering Breit-Wigner functions and a continuum contribution modeled by the DIME MC. There is an indication that the DIME MC model overestimates the high invariant mass region of the exclusive pion pair. The measured total exclusive $\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ production cross section is 19.6 $\pm$ 0.4 (stat) $\pm$ 3.5 (syst) $\pm$ 0.01 (lumi) and 19.0 $\pm$ 0.6 (stat) $\pm$ 3.4 (syst) $\pm$ 0.01 (lumi) $\mu$b for 5.02 and 13 TeV, respectively. The exclusive production cross sections for the resonances are obtained assuming the most important resonances in the invariant mass spectrum are described by Breit-Wigner resonances interfering with a continuum contribution. The high-mass parts of the spectra are overestimated, which can be attributed to the DIME MC mismodeling of the continuum shape and further resonances, which might influence spectrum shape via interference effects. The obtained cross sections of $\rho^{0}(770)$ production are consistent with the STARLIGHT model prediction.
References
1 P. Lebiedowicz and A. Szczurek Exclusive $ {{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}}} \to {{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}}\pi^+\pi^-} $ reaction: From the threshold to LHC Phy. Rev. D 81 (2010) 036003 0912.0190
2 P. Lebiedowicz, O. Nachtmann, and A. Szczurek Central exclusive diffractive production of $ \pi^+\pi^- $ continuum, scalar and tensor resonances in pp and $ {\mathrm{p}}\mathrm{\bar{p}} $ scattering within tensor pomeron approach PRD 93 (2016) 054015 1601.04537
3 P. Lebiedowicz, O. Nachtmann, and A. Szczurek $ \rho^0 $ and Drell-S$ oding $ contributions to central exclusive production of $ \pi^+\pi^- $ pairs in proton-proton collisions at high energies PRD 91 (2015) 074023 1412.3677
4 A. Bolz et al. Photoproduction of $ \pi^+\pi^- $ pairs in a model with tensor-pomeron and vector-odderon exchange JHEP 01 (2015) 151 1409.8483
5 R. A. Ryutin Central exclusive diffractive production of two-pion continuum at hadron colliders EPJC 79 (2019) 981 1910.06683
6 WA102 Collaboration A partial wave analysis of the centrally produced $ {\mathrm{K^{+}}\mathrm{K^{-}}} $ and $ {{\mathrm{K^0_S}}{\mathrm{K^0_S}}} $ systems in pp interactions at 450$ GeV/$c and new information on the spin of the f$ _{J} $(1710) PLB 453 (1999) 305 hep-ex/9903042
7 WA102 Collaboration A partial wave analysis of the centrally produced $ \pi^0\pi^0 $ system in $ {{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}}} $ interactions at 450$ GeV/$c PLB 453 (1999) 325 hep-ex/9903044
8 WA102 Collaboration A partial wave analysis of the centrally produced $ \pi^+\pi^- $ system in pp interactions at 450$ GeV/$c PLB 453 (1999) 316 hep-ex/9903043
9 ABCDHW Collaboration Production of the f$ _0 $ meson in the double pomeron exchange reaction $ {\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}}\to{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{p}}\pi^+\pi^- $ at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 62 ~GeV Z. Phys. C 31 (1986) 185
10 ABCDHW Collaboration The reaction pomeron-pomeron $ \to\pi^+\pi^- $ and an unusual production mechanism for the f$ _2 $(1270) Z. Phys. C 48 (1990) 569
11 ABCDHW Collaboration Evidence for f$ _2 $(1720) production in the reaction pomeron-pomeron $ \to\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^- $ Z. Phys. C 58 (1993) 251
12 Axial-Field Spectrometer Collaboration A search for glueballs and a study of double pomeron exchange at the CERN Intersecting Storage Rings NPB 264 (1985) 154
13 CDF Collaboration Measurement of central exclusive $ \pi^+\pi^- $ production in $ {\mathrm{p}}\mathrm{\bar{p}} $ collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 0.9 and 1.96~TeV at CDF PRD 91 (2015) 091101 1502.01391
14 H1 Collaboration Elastic photoproduction of J/$ \psi $ and $ \Upsilon $ mesons at HERA PLB 483 (2000) 23 hep-ex/0003020
15 ZEUS Collaboration Exclusive photoproduction of $ \Upsilon $ mesons at HERA PLB 680 (2009) 4 0903.4205
16 J. R. Forshaw and D. A. Ross Quantum chromodynamics and the pomeron Cambridge University Press, 1997 , ISBN 9780511524387
17 S. Donnachie, G. Dosch, P. Landshoff, and O. Nachtmann Pomeron physics and QCD Cambridge University Press, 2002 , ISBN 9780511534935
18 W. Ochs The status of glueballs JPG 40 (2013) 043001 1301.5183
19 A. A. Godizov High-energy central exclusive production of the lightest vacuum resonance related to the soft pomeron PLB 787 (2018) 188 1810.01824
20 Particle Data Group, M. Tanabashi et al. Review of particle physics PRD 98 (2018) 030001
21 S. Okubo $ \phi $-meson and unitary symmetry model PL5 (1963) 165
22 G. Zweig An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. version 2 in Developments in the quark theory of hadrons. VOL. 1. 1964 - 1978, D. Lichtenberg and S. P. Rosen, eds., p. 221964
23 J. Iizuka Systematics and phenomenology of meson family Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 37 (1966) 21
24 CMS Collaboration Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker JINST 9 (2014) P10009 CMS-TRK-11-001
1405.6569
25 CMS Collaboration The CMS trigger system JINST 12 (2017) P01020 CMS-TRG-12-001
1609.02366
26 CMS Collaboration The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC JINST 3 (2008) S08004 CMS-00-001
27 CMS Collaboration Measurement of diffraction dissociation cross sections in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 TeV PRD 92 (2015) 012003 CMS-FSQ-12-005
1503.08689
28 T. Sjostrand et al. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 CPC 191 (2015) 159 1410.3012
29 CMS Collaboration Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements EPJC 76 (2016) 155 CMS-GEN-14-001
1512.00815
30 R. Ciesielski and K. Goulianos MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8 PoS ICHEP2012 (2013) 301 1205.1446
31 K. Werner, F.-M. Liu, and T. Pierog Parton ladder splitting and the rapidity dependence of transverse momentum spectra in deuteron-gold collisions at RHIC PRC 74 (2006) 044902 hep-ph/0506232
32 T. Pierog et al. EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider PRC 92 (2015) 034906 1306.0121
33 H. J. Drescher et al. Parton based Gribov-Regge theory PR 350 (2001) 93 hep-ph/0007198
34 S. R. Klein and J. Nystrand Photoproduction of quarkonium in proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus collisions PRL 92 (2004) 142003 hep-ph/0311164
35 L. A. Harland-Lang, V. A. Khoze, and M. G. Ryskin Modelling exclusive meson pair production at hadron colliders EPJC 74 (2014) 2848 1312.4553
36 GEANT4 Collaboration GEANT4--a simulation toolkit NIMA 506 (2003) 250
37 L. Quertenmont Particle identification with ionization energy loss in the CMS silicon strip tracker NPPS 215 (2011) 95
38 CMS Collaboration Study of the inclusive production of charged pions, kaons, and protons in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 0.9 , 2.76, and 7 TeV EPJC 72 (2012) 2164 CMS-FSQ-12-014
1207.4724
39 TOTEM Collaboration First measurement of elastic, inelastic and total cross-section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV by TOTEM and overview of cross-section data at LHC energies EPJC 79 (2019) 103 1712.06153
40 CMS Collaboration Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 13 TeV JHEP 07 (2018) 161 CMS-FSQ-15-005
1802.02613
41 CMS Collaboration Energy calibration and resolution of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = $ 7 ~TeV JINST 8 (2013) P09009 CMS-EGM-11-001
1306.2016
42 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity calibration for the pp reference run at $ \sqrt{s}= $ 5.02 TeV CMS-PAS-LUM-16-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-16-001
43 CMS Collaboration CMS luminosity measurement for the 2015 data-taking period CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001
44 J. D. Jackson Remarks on the phenomenological analysis of resonances Il Nuovo Cim. 34 (1964) 1644
45 R. Garcia-Martin, R. Kaminski, J. R. Pelaez, and J. Ruiz de Elvira Precise determination of the f$ _0(600) $ and f$ _0(980) $ pole parameters from a dispersive data analysis PRL 107 (2011) 072001 1107.1635
Compact Muon Solenoid
LHC, CERN