CMS-PAS-TOP-16-016 | ||
Search for standard model production of four top quarks in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV | ||
CMS Collaboration | ||
August 2016 | ||
Abstract: A search for standard model four top quark production, combining the single lepton and dilepton channels, is presented. The analysis utilises the data recorded by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV in 2015, which corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 2.6 fb$^{-1}$. A boosted decision tree algorithm is used to select signal and suppress background events. Upper limits on four top quark production of $ 10.2 \times \sigma_{t\overline{t}t\overline{t}}^{SM}$ observed and $ 10.8^{+6.7}_{-3.8} \times \sigma_{t\overline{t}t\overline{t}}^{SM}$ expected are calculated at the 95% confidence level. | ||
Links:
CDS record (PDF) ;
inSPIRE record ;
CADI line (restricted) ;
These preliminary results are superseded in this paper, PLB 772 (2017) 336. The superseded preliminary plots can be found here. |
Figures | |
png pdf |
Figure 1:
The dominant diagram for ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ production in the SM at leading order. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-a:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet1}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (c) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-b:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet1}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (c) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 2-c:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet1}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (c) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} $+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 3-a:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet2}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a) and e+jets (b) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 3-b:
The ${\textrm {BDT}_{\textrm {trijet2}}}$ discriminant for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a) and e+jets (b) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 4-a:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 4-b:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 4-c:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 4-d:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 4-e:
The $N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a), e+jets (b), the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (c), $\mu $e (d) and ee (e) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 5-a:
The $S$ distributions for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (bottom) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 5-b:
The $S$ distributions for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (bottom) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 5-c:
The $S$ distributions for data and simulation in the dilepton channel for the $\mu \mu $ (a), $\mu $e (b) and ee (bottom) final states with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 6-a:
The $T$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a) and e+jets (b) final states are shown with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 6-b:
The $T$ distributions for data and simulation in the single lepton channel for the $\mu $+jets (a) and e+jets (b) final states are shown with the dominant systematic uncertainty shown in hatched bands and the ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+X sample representing the sum of ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$ , ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+Z, ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+W, and ${\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}}$+H production. |
png pdf |
Figure 7-a:
Dilepton BDT output discriminator summed across lepton species channels for 4-5 jets (upper left), 6-7 jets (upper right), and $\geq $8 jets (bottom). |
png pdf |
Figure 7-b:
Dilepton BDT output discriminator summed across lepton species channels for 4-5 jets (upper left), 6-7 jets (upper right), and $\geq $8 jets (bottom). |
png pdf |
Figure 7-c:
Dilepton BDT output discriminator summed across lepton species channels for 4-5 jets (upper left), 6-7 jets (upper right), and $\geq $8 jets (bottom). |
png pdf |
Figure 8-a:
BDT output distributions in the $\mu $+jets channel (a) and e+jets channel (b) for the $\geq 9 N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ and $3 N {_{\textrm {tags}}^{\textrm {M}}} $category. |
png pdf |
Figure 8-b:
BDT output distributions in the $\mu $+jets channel (a) and e+jets channel (b) for the $\geq 9 N {_{\textrm {j}}}$ and $3 N {_{\textrm {tags}}^{\textrm {M}}} $category. |
png pdf |
Figure 9-a:
BDT output distributions in the $\mu $ jets channel (a) and e+jets channel (b) for the $\geq 9 N {_{\textrm {j}}} $ and $\geq 4 N {_{\textrm {tags}}^{\textrm {M}}}$ category. |
png pdf |
Figure 9-b:
BDT output distributions in the $\mu $ jets channel (a) and e+jets channel (b) for the $\geq 9 N {_{\textrm {j}}} $ and $\geq 4 N {_{\textrm {tags}}^{\textrm {M}}}$ category. |
png pdf |
Figure 10:
Expected and observed upper limits on ${\sigma _{ {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} }^{SM}}$ for the single lepton, dilepton, and combined analysis in multiples of ${\sigma _{ {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} }^{SM}} $. |
Tables | |
png pdf |
Table 1:
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the standard model four top quark production as a multiple of ${\sigma _{ {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} {\mathrm {t}\overline {\mathrm {t}}} }^{SM}} $. The values quoted on the expected limits are the 1$\sigma $ uncertainties. |
Summary |
A search for events containing four top quarks has been performed using 2.6 fb$^{-1}$ of data recorded by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV. The analysis focuses on a combination of the single lepton channel in the $\mu$+jets and e+jets final states and dilepton channel in the $\mu \mu$, $\mu$e, and ee final states. The analysis is comprised of three stages. Firstly, a baseline selection is defined for each final state that is used to broadly select signal events while suppressing backgrounds. Secondly, an event classification scheme based on a BDT algorithm is defined, further enhancing sensitivity to four top quark production. The BDT algorithm exploits the differences in event activity, event topology, b content and t content to discriminate between signal and background. Thirdly, upper limits on four top quark production of $10.2 \times {\sigma_{{t}\overline{{t}}} {{t}\overline{{t}}} }^{SM} $ observed and $10.8^{+6.7}_{-3.8} \times \sigma^{SM}_{{{t}\overline{{t}}} {{t}\overline{{t}}} }$ expected are calculated at the 95% CL. |
References | ||||
1 | ATLAS, CDF, CMS, D0 Collaboration | First combination of Tevatron and LHC measurements of the top-quark mass | 1403.4427 | |
2 | G. Cacciapaglia et al. | Composite scalars at the LHC: the Higgs, the Sextet and the Octet | JHEP 11 (2015) 201 | 1507.02283 |
3 | C. Arina et al. | A comprehensive approach to dark matter studies: exploration of simplified top-philic models | 1605.09242 | |
4 | M. Toharia and J. D. Wells | Gluino decays with heavier scalar superpartners | JHEP 02 (2006) 015 | hep-ph/0503175 |
5 | S. Calvet, B. Fuks, P. Gris, and L. Valery | Searching for sgluons in multitop events at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV | JHEP 04 (2013) 043 | 1212.3360 |
6 | Q.-H. Cao, S.-L. Chen, and Y. Liu | Probing Higgs Width and Top Quark Yukawa Coupling from $ \textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}\textrm{H} $ and $ \textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}\textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}} $ Productions | 1602.01934 | |
7 | O. Ducu, L. Heurtier, and J. Maurer | LHC signatures of a Z' mediator between dark matter and the SU(3) sector | JHEP 03 (2016) 006 | 1509.05615 |
8 | G. Bevilacqua and M. Worek | Constraining BSM Physics at the LHC: Four top final states with NLO accuracy in perturbative QCD | JHEP 07 (2012) 111 | 1206.3064 |
9 | CMS Collaboration | Search for standard model production of four top quarks in the lepton + jets channel in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $= 8 TeV | JHEP 11 (2014) 154 | |
10 | ATLAS Collaboration | Search for supersymmetry at $ \sqrt{s} $=8 TeV in final states with jets and two same-sign leptons or three leptons with the ATLAS detector | JHEP 06 (2014) 035 | 1404.2500 |
11 | CMS Collaboration | Search for new physics in same-sign dilepton events in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV | CMS-SUS-15-008 1605.03171 |
|
12 | J. Alwall et al. | The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations | JHEP 07 (2014) 079 | 1405.0301 |
13 | CMS Collaboration | The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC | JINST 3 (2008) S08004 | CMS-00-001 |
14 | J. Alwall et al. | MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond | JHEP 06 (2011) 128 | 1106.0522 |
15 | P. Nason | A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms | JHEP 11 (2004) 040 | hep-ph/0409146 |
16 | S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari | Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method | JHEP 11 (2007) 070 | 0709.2092 |
17 | S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re | A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX | JHEP 06 (2010) 043 | 1002.2581 |
18 | S. Alioli, S.-O. Moch, and P. Uwer | Hadronic top-quark pair-production with one jet and parton showering | JHEP 1 (2012) 137 | |
19 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of $ \mathrm {t}\overline{\mathrm {t}} $ production with additional jet activity, including $ \mathrm {b} $ quark jets, in the dilepton decay channel using pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 8\,\text {TeV} $ | EPJC 76 (2016) 379 | CMS-TOP-12-041 1510.03072 |
20 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the differential cross section for $ \mathrm{t \bar t} $ production in the dilepton final state at $ \sqrt{s}=13 \mathrm{TeV} $ | CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011 | CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011 |
21 | E. Re | Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method | EPJC 71 (2011) 1547 | 1009.2450 |
22 | T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands | PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual | JHEP 05 (2006) 026 | |
23 | T. Sj\"ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands | A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1 | Computer Physics Communications 178 (2008) 852 | |
24 | NNPDF Collaboration | Unbiased global determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties at NNLO and at LO | Nucl. Phys. B 855 (2012) 153 | 1107.2652 |
25 | GEANT4 Collaboration | GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit | NIMA 506 (2003) 250 | |
26 | CMS Collaboration | Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and performance for jets, taus, and $ E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}} $ | CDS | |
27 | CMS Collaboration | Commissioning of the particle-flow event reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector | CDS | |
28 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} = 8 $~TeV | JINST 10 (2015) P06005 | CMS-EGM-13-001 1502.02701 |
29 | CMS Collaboration | Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at $ \sqrt{s}=7 $ TeV | JINST 7 (2012) P10002 | CMS-MUO-10-004 1206.4071 |
30 | M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez | The anti-$ k_t $ jet clustering algorithm | JHEP 04 (2008) 063 | 0802.1189 |
31 | M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez | FastJet User Manual | EPJC 72 (2012) 1896 | 1111.6097 |
32 | CMS Collaboration | Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS | JINST 6 (2011) P11002 | CMS-JME-10-011 1107.4277 |
33 | CMS Collaboration | Identification of b quark jets at the CMS Experiment in the LHC Run 2 | CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 | CMS-PAS-BTV-15-001 |
34 | L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone | Chapman and Hall/CRC | ||
35 | H. J. Friedman | Recent Advances in Predictive (Machine) Learning | Journal of Classification 23 (2006) 175 | |
36 | A. Hocker et al. | TMVA - Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis | PoS ACAT (2007) 040 | physics/0703039 |
37 | J. D. Bjorken and S. J. Brodsky | Statistical Model for electron-Positron Annihilation Into Hadrons | PRD 1 (1970) 1416 | |
38 | CMS Collaboration | CMS Luminosity Measurement for the 2015 Data Taking Period | CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 | CMS-PAS-LUM-15-001 |
39 | M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov | Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders Through $ O(\alpha^4_S) $ | PRL 110 (2013) 252004 | 1303.6254 |
40 | CMS Collaboration | Measurement of the cross section ratio $ \textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}\textrm{b}\bar{\textrm{b}}/\textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}\textrm{j}\textrm{j} $ using dilepton final states in pp collisions at 13 TeV | ||
41 | L. Moneta et al. | The RooStats Project | PoS ACAT2010 (2010) 057 | 1009.1003 |
42 | ATLAS, CMS, LHC Higgs Combination Group Collaboration | Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011 | CMS-NOTE-2011-005 | |
43 | R. Barlow and C. Beeston | Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples | Computer Physics Communications 77 (1993) 219 |
Compact Muon Solenoid LHC, CERN |